ALL RIGHTS RESERVED vs. ET CETERA: Incarcerated Sovereign Citizen Mike Parsons seeks an injunction to prevent future medical tests and injections

Posted on September 19, 2020 by Jacquelyn Weaver

Frater I*I recently sent me a copy of Mike Parsons’ latest pro se lawsuit filed September 8, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Western Division at Memphis. [Parsons doc 1 908 2020]

Michael Wayne Parsons

It is a lonely day for Michael Wayne Parsons when the only ones who take the time to read his dried up civil lawsuits are Frater I*I and Tracking the Leopard Meroz.

Rudy Davis’ prison ministry used to feature the jailhouse phone calls of Mike Parsons on his LoneStar 1776 YouTube channel, as a self-proclaimed “innocent”, (yet “guilty as hell”), American political prisoner.

Those were the good ol’ days, when Rudy Davis would rant against Robert Baty’s Facebook group, Kent Hovind’s Worst Nightmare!, calling us devils and hyenas from hell.

In recent months, the Bureau of Prisons has cut off Rudy Davis from communicating with certain inmates. However, he still continues to publish jailhouse phone calls from Mike Parsons’ wife, Pat, who was “sentenced to sixty months in federal prison for aiding and abetting solicitation to commit kidnapping”, as explained in this December 12, 2017, United States Attorney’s Office, Western District of Tennessee press release.

Mike Parsons has titled his latest complaint as, “By Special Appearance Only & By Right, Ambassador Mike Parsons-A Live Man Tsilhqot’in Nation, Country of Chilcotin All Rights Reserved vs. United States of America, Corporation, U. S. Department of Justice, Corporation, U. S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Corporation, Federal Correctional Institute in Memphis, Et Cetera, Et. al.”

Despite previous court rulings that overturned Parsons’ claim that he had diplomatic immunity on the basis of his fake ambassador credentials, he still demands to be referred to as Ambassador Mike Parsons-A Live Man, Tsilqot’in Nation, Country of Chilcotin.

Jurisdiction: The Absurd interpretation of Sovereign Citizen legal reasoning

According to an August 1, 2019, Montana Law Review article, A Legal Response to the Sovereign Citizen Movement, by Caesar Kalinowski IV, Sovereign Citizens maintain a distinction between the identification of what they call a “legally fictitious person” and that of a “natural person”.

On page 158, under Jurisdiction, the author says, “In short, Sovereign Citizens believe that the ‘U. S. citizen, is a legal fiction that has been created by the federal government, via the social security application, and is a corporate employee of the United States by virtue of being a U. S. citizen.’ This artificial person alone ‘is subject to the jurisdiction of the federal government and of the state government and subject to the corporate income tax.’ Accordingly, only by consenting to a Fourteenth Amendment-based federal citizenship is an individual governed by the United States Government. Additionally, if an individual ‘renounces’ his or her federal citizenship and divests the ‘legally fictitious person’ through a series of complex steps, then the government has no power over the ‘Natural Person’. ”

Michael Wayne Parsons has stated under oath that he is not a citizen of the United States of America. But proof that the government has power over his natural person is the simple fact that Parsons now lives in a federal penitentiary.

Michael Wayne Parsons insults his mother by claiming he is not the fictional person shown on his birth certificate

Parsons claims to be an ambassador for an (unrecognized) nation that he has never resided in. It appears the only time he ever desired to move to the Chilcotin nation was when he was fleeing the law in the United States.

According to his birth certificate, Michael Wayne Parsons was born in Memphis, Tennessee, on May 5, 1961, as noted on page 15 of Document 11-9 (2/11/2020) In the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee at Jackson re: State of Tennessee vs. Michael Wayne Parsons. As an aside, Document 11-9 is an interesting read for anyone who wants to see how the Court overturns sovereign citizen legal arguments.

The September 8, 2020, Injunction lawsuit, in Document 3, shows that the Court has shortened the title of Parson’s Injunction lawsuit to MIKE PARSONS a/k/a MICHAEL WAYNE PARSONS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL. Document 3 directs the plaintiff “to comply with 28 U. S. C. §1915(A)(1)-(2) or pay the $400 civil filing fee”. In addition, the Court reminds the plaintiff of the stark reality of his identity and location by addressing him as “Mike Parsons, a/k/a/Michael Wayne Parsons, Bureau of Prisons register number 30237-047, who is incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Memphis, Tennessee“. [Parsons doc 3 910 2020]

Why Parsons wants an immediate restraining order that circumvents notification to defendants and/or holding a hearing

Parsons explains the goal of his lawsuit, saying, “this emergency petition for a temporary restraining order and injunction baring the defendants, who’s[sic] employee includes Mr. Boykin from threatening or attempting to commit any act of injecting me with any vaccine or chemical or any other contraindicated form of test to prevent further injury to me is necessary. Failure to provide this relief for an immediate restraining order will result in irreparable injury and time simply does not permit notification to defendants and or holding a hearing. (Fed R. civil p.65).”

He adds, “Efforts seeking an administrative remedy have been delayed now for over a year and a review of write-up and responses to my grievances reveals application of policy that does not exist in an attempt to cover up the assault on me…”.

I have confidence that United States District Judge Mark S. Norris will properly address all of the issues which Michael Parsons lays out in his lawsuit.

The Backstory on why Michael Wayne Parsons is a Felon

Tracking the Leopard Meroz has at least 6 articles referencing Mike Parsons; four of those contain relevant legal documentation and commentary on sovereign citizen legal theories:

Sovereign Citizen Mike Parsons Demonstrates How Not to Make a Citizen Arrest (6/30/2018)

In Defiance of Jesus Christ, Rudy Davis’ LoneStar 1776 Prison Ministry Promotes the Whitewashing of Sovereign Citizen Michael Parsons’ Crimes and Contentious Behavior (7/9/2018)

Michael Parsons’ Dream Trial of Escaping the Law Through Diplomatic Immunity turns into a Defensive Nightmare for His Court Appointed Attorney (4/17/2019)

Michael Parsons’ Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (2/18/2020)

Going back 14 years, we see the beginning of Mike Parsons’ troubled interactions with government authorities. Parsons had been a candidate for the office of Tipton County Executive in the August 3, 2006, general election; but having lost, he filed a lawsuit on August 14, 2006, to contest the election results. This complaint was ultimately dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, among other things. The Appeals Court affirmed the trial court decision, which Joseph H. Walker, as Chancellor in Tipton County, Tennessee had presided over.

For Parsons’ version of events, see his website, MikeParsons.org.

Years later, we see Judge Walker’s name reappear in the news, when Mike Parsons’ wife was arrested for conspiring with Suzanne Holland, a self-appointed Chief Justice of the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in Nation in Canada, for a kidnapping plot of that Tipton County judge, as well as a Nebraska sheriff.

About a year after the election dispute, an incident occurred on September 24, 2007, which set a bizarre series of events in motion. It began when some of Mike Parsons’ wolf-hybrids escaped, and Barry Laxton, who was mowing the neighboring property, responded by shooting one of the wolf-hybrids. This incident unfortunately escalated; consequently, a jury later convicted Parsons of two counts of aggravated assault, one count of burglary of a vehicle, and two counts of theft under $500. According to the Appeals court opinion for the State of Tennessee v. Michael W. Parsons, “the effective sentence was seven years on the felony convictions.”

On February 11, 2014, wreg.com published an article by Ashley Crockett, explaining that Mike Parsons had been arrested for being a felon in possession of a firearm, after his property was searched due to a complaint by PETA for possible animal abuse. However, Parsons’ 70 wolf-hybrids, roosters, horses, rabbits, cats, turkeys, and chickens were found to be healthy, fed, and with adequate shelter. The downside for Mike Parsons was that investigators discovered a “Remington 700 .308 rifle with scope, a loaded Smith and Wesson 357 revolver, magazines for an AR-15, over 850 rounds of ammunition for various calibers of weapons including .22, .308 and 357 and a bayonet for an AR-15.” He claimed they belonged to his wife. (What housewife doesn’t keep a spare AR-15 bayonet in the kitchen knife drawer?)

In January of 2017, we read in a U. S. Court of Appeals Opinion on United States of America vs. Michael Wayne Parsons, that “Parsons absconded while on pretrial release awaiting trial on Tennessee charges of being a felon in possession of a firearm. A warrant was issued in Tennessee for his failure to appear. On January 11, 2017, Parsons piloted a small plane to the Arapahoe Airport located in Furnas County, Nebraska. It appears that Parsons was en route to the Tsilhqot’in Nation in Canada. On March 22, 2017, officers from the Federal Bureau of Investigation searched the plane pursuant to a warrant and discovered an AR-15 style rifle, three fully loaded 30 round magazines and additional ammunition.”

In December of 2018, Michael Wayne Parsons, age 57, was sentenced to 84 months in prison, for being a felon in possession of a firearm, to be followed by three years of supervised release.

So now, both Michael Wayne Parsons and his wife, Pat, sit incarcerated in federal prison cells, when once they enjoyed freedom on a lovely Tennessee farm with numerous animals. Both are professionals and able to provide for a comfortable life. All that was destroyed by the hubris of Parsons, who thought that by a strange form of legal magic, the U. S. government cannot claim jurisdiction over him.

Discipline Hearing Officer Report- U. S. Department of Justice-Federal Bureau of Prisons

Michael Parsons filed Document 1-2 ( pages 5-7) in his Injunction lawsuit, displaying a three page Discipline Hearing Officer Report for an incident on August 20, 2019, involving Parsons’ refusal to provide a DNA sample, and refusing an Order. The Hearing was held on January 16, 2020, via video conference. [With regard to “refusing an order from staff”, “The DHO determined Section 11 of the incident report does not support Code 307, Refusing An Order, and has both expunged and removed it from the Summary of Charges”.]

Under Section VI. Sanction or Action Taken, six actions were taken in response to the refusal of Parsons to provide a DNA sample.

It is logical that there can be no exceptions to the DNA sample rule in a prison environment, because to do so would create discontent among other prisoners that might endanger the staff and other inmates.[Bureau of Prisons DNA procedures]

FraterI*I has uploaded several Parsons’ court audios; in one, the Judge orders Parsons to submit to a DNA sample procedure

For those who have not heard Michael Parsons’ spoken testimony in a court room, I recommend listening to the court audios uploaded on the FraterI*I Youtube channel.

By way of illustration, here is a short audio (19.35 minutes) of a Parsons’ court hearing on December 18, 2017, and, uploaded April 8, 2018, on the Frater I*I YouTube channel titled, Michael W. Parsons, SovCit of the Pop-A-Squat nation in court, pt 1.

A short excerpt of the audio court hearing on December 17, 2018

The Judge begins this Hearing, saying, “We’re on the record. We’re on the record in case number 4:17 CR 3038, United States of America vs. Michael Wayne Parsons. Counsel, please enter your appearance.”

Counsel: Good afternoon Your Honor, Jan Sharp, Assistant United States Attorney, appearing on behalf of the United States.

And John Vanderslice, on behalf of Mr. Parsons.

Court: Are you Michael Wayne Parsons?

Michael Wayne Parsons: Are we on the record?

Court: Yes we are.

Parsons: Good morning, Your Honor. Good afternoon. Let the record show that I was just brought in here by force, against my will, and officer directly behind me assaulted me, threw me to the ground, drugged me in here. I’ve got broken ribs, broken arm, multiple injuries from previous assaults, and I just sustained another one by this gentleman behind me. I want that to be on the record, first of all. Also the, the fictitious person in the birth certificate have been surrendered to the court.

Court: Please stay seated. You must stay seated.

Parsons: Birth certificate there. Let the record show that by special appearance Ambassador Parsons of the Chilcotin nation, country of the Chilcotin, the beneficiary, I’m here and I reserve all of my rights without prejudice UCC 1-308 the Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations and the Montevideo convention having already surrendered the fictitious person and birth certificate into the well of this Court. This court lacks jurisdiction and I have no business with this court. Am I free to go?

Court: No.

Parsons: I will instruct you as the Trustee to dispose of the charge, pay off any debts, and compensate me for the damages.

Court: Are you Michael Wayne Parsons?

Parsons: I am NOT the fictitious person that you seek. You’re seeking, according to this affidavit, a corporate entity, Michael Wayne Parsons. I am NOT that person. I’m not the fiduciary, surety, or trustee for that corporate entity or trust.

Court: Alright.

Parsons: I’m a live man. This Court is not an Article 3 court. As an ambassador of another country according to the Constitution, Article 3 section 2, all matters pertaining to ambassadors, the original jurisdiction and sole jurisdiction is with the article 3 section 2 Supreme Court. This is not that. This court lacks jurisdiction.

Court: All right. Are you saying you are not Michael Wayne Parsons?

Parsons: I am not the person in the indictment. That is a fictitious person.

Court: What is your name? what is your name?

Parsons: I am Ambassador Parsons of the Chilcotin nation, country of the Chilcotin. I am not the person, the fictitious person that is in this indictment. That is not me..

Court: All right, now ambassador Parsons what is your first name?

Parsons: I’m referred to as Ambassador Parsons for the record.

Court: All right.

Parsons: I do not consent to this forum. I do not, I do not understand this forum. This gentleman just approached me in moments earlier and I tried to ask questions. He could not answer any of the questions.

Court: All right. What I’m going to do is first of all, we’ll have to have an identity hearing. And interestingly, my understanding is that you have refused to be processed by the marshals which would include your DNA, and your fingerprints. You are hereby ordered to submit to processing by the marshals. They will go ahead and do that even if it’s necessary to do it involuntarily.

Parsons: I would like to be heard on that matter. I don’t consent to that under the United States Supreme Court ruling under title 42 2000 BB, the Religious Freedoms Restoration Act, it is against my religious objections. I do not do TB shots or I do not do any unknown foreign substances into my body and they’re trying to force a TB test upon me as a violation of United States Code and Supreme Court rulings that say that if I’m not symptomatic, they can’t force me against my will. I’ve never done TB tests. I don’t consent to those now. It is against my rights as a human being given to me by my Creator not to give up my DNA which is in violation of the fifth amendment also, and it’s in violation of the Universal Supreme Court Act of the Chilcotin nation. I am not subject to the jurisdiction of this Court. This Court does not have jurisdiction over me.

Court: The Court does have jurisdiction over you. You are hereby ordered and the marshals are hereby ordered to process you, which would include the DNA and would include the fingerprinting and any other matters and photographing, I assume.

Parsons: I do not consent to this.

Court: It doesn’t make any difference.

Parsons: I do not consent to this offer. I do not accept your offer.

Court: It is not an offer. It’s an Order.

Parsons: An Order is an offer….

Document 3 for Parsons’ latest lawsuit is stated as an ORDER to pay the civil filing fee or fill out an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Judge, in footnote 2, noted that “Even a voluntary dismissal by Plaintiff will not eliminate the obligation to pay the filing fee.”

THE OATH Above All Oaths of Robert David Steele, Chief Counsel for the International Tribunal for Natural Justice

Posted on September 16, 2018 by Jacquelyn Weaver

Show the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that ye are gods: yea, do good, or do evil, that we may be dismayed, and behold it together. Isaiah 41:23

Chief Counsel Robert David Steele at the 4/2018 Westminster Seatings of ITNJ

Robert David Steele, in an April 2018 Westminster Seatings video for the ITNJ stated at the 2.20 mark, “I have been a spy, I am out from under cover. I’m under a lifetime secrecy agreement…”. This statement about his obligations to the CIA was made as he sat as the Chief Counsel for the International Tribunal for Natural Justice.

As a signatory to the ITNJ Constitution, Steele has approved Article 7 (2) that By affirming an oath in accordance with the present Article, Judges and Officers acknowledge that said oath shall take precedence over any and all other oaths or commitments that the Judge or Officer in question may have made to any other court or government or professional body or private association.

This raises the question as to whether the ITNJ Oath of Office takes precedence over Robert David Steele’s CIA secrecy oath.

Also, we must consider whether this same oath takes precedence over U. S. perjury laws which are a foundational safeguard in court proceedings. As we know, Robert David Steele and his non-profit organization Earth Intelligence Network are the plaintiffs in a United States federal civil lawsuit.

Why would anyone take such a loyalty oath to ITNJ, a legally problematic international tribunal which had its beginnings rooted in Sovereign Citizen legal theories?

The last time I was observing Robert David Steele, he had been entertaining great visions of reforming the United States of America on multiple levels. After the last Presidential election, Steele’s visions were ignored by Trump who refused to meet with him. In an interview with Joseph Ford Cotto in June of 2017, Steele had shared several of his great plans, and number 3 on his list involved the CIA and his desire to be the head honcho of their operations, as shown in this screenshot.After the election, the CIA waited nervously to see if President Trump would give Robert David Steele the time of day. One can imagine that CIA coffee breaks featured coins being tossed in the air to decide who would be the winners comprising the 50% who were fired, or the losers who would have to implement Robert David Steele’s grandiose visions. No doubt, a collective sigh of relief was heard in the heavens when Trump rebuffed Steele.

Here is what Robert David Steele had discussed with Benjamin Fulford in Japan, as noted in my A Man Called Sue article on March 21, 2018:It appears that Robert David Steele has been sidetracked from the Benjamin Fulford visionary intersection, and has been working on his alliance with former rock musician Sacha Stone, founder of the International Tribunal for Natural Justice.

Finger prints of the gods

The Claims of the Living blog has documented in a series of articles, the beginnings of the legal and operational foundations of ITNJ, prior to the American team, led by Rebecca Cope, being ousted by Sacha Stone. Cope is an advocate for the sovereign citizen theories promoted by a self-proclaimed “Judge” in Alaska, named Anna Von Reitz. Visual signs which serve to identify the practitioners of Sovereign Citizen ideology can be seen in the photograph below of blood-red fingerprints beside several signatory names to the ITNJ Constitution. The Robert David Steele defamation lawsuit in U. S. district court

On September 1, 2017 Robert David Steele and his non-profit Earth Intelligence Network filed a $15,350,000 defamation lawsuit against Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron, and Queen Tut, a woman believed to be known as Carla A. Howell. This lawsuit was amended on April 13, 2018 in document 39. One of the changes was that Queen Tut was declared to be Susan A. Lutzke, the damages were increased by 3 million dollars, more recent defamation evidence was introduced, and the following addition to the Plaintiff’s work history and accomplishments was introduced to counter a new accusation made by defendants:

What is misleading about the title of Chief Counsel, is that in the case of Robert David Steele, he is neither an attorney, nor a legal scholar. And when it came time for him to file a federal civil court lawsuit, he hired attorney Steven S. Biss who has been disciplined by the Virginia Bar to represent him, rather than trying to impress the federal judge with his fake title.

The same persons seen during the #UNRIG campaign are found connected to ITNJ

As we take a look at Steele’s Chief Counsel position at the International Tribunal for Natural Justice, three other names show up in the history of this organization that I am familiar with. Robert David Steele would also be familiar with the writings of Anna Von Reitz, as her name was referenced in his own blog, and in addition, he has been interviewed by Victurus Libertas who promotes sovereign citizen ideology, including that of Anna Von Reitz. As shown here in an official International Tribunal for Natural Justice (ITNJ) photo we also see Cynthia McKinney who helped to promote Steele’s #UNRIG election reform efforts, and also Youtuber, David Seaman who played an important part in pushing the fake Pizzagate scandal.

Note the prominence of Cynthia McKinney of #UNRIG election reform days when she became noted for going cross-country with Steele in a tax exempt plastic wrapped RV. George Webb declined Steele’s invitation to be chief recorder of that event, and so now David Seaman is the exalted investigative reporter at ITNJ, known for being on the forefront of the fake Pizzagate story which involved undocumented accusations of pedophilia.

One of the arguments which Rebecca Cope had set forth was that she did not want an ITNJ requirement that judges must have legal qualifications from existing recognized institutions. It was her desire to allow “special individuals”, such as the self-educated and self-proclaimed “Judge” Anna Von Reitz, to be appointed as one of ITNJ’s judges. Note that presently ITNJ had no problem granting non-attorney Robert David Steele the title of Chief Counsel, allowing him to have an appearance of expertise and authority while adorned in a black robe during their formal meetings.

The ITNJ Constitution has loop holes to accommodate the indiscretions of its Chief Justice

Presiding ITNJ Chief Justice Sir John Walsh of Brannaugh has engaged in numerous eyebrow raising activities, including creating Greenwich University which failed to meet Australian academic standards and for which he appointed a convicted fraudster as chancellor. A UK website, Hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com, in their April 11, 2018 article written by El Coyote, titled ITNJ ‘Chief Justice’ stripped of ability to practice law, extensively documents John Walsh’s Australian barrister history which caused him to be a focal point in a Senate inquiry.

Perhaps this is the reason why the ITNJ Constitution removed the words “I swear” from their Oath of Office, preferring the more nebulous wording of “I affirm”. The following comment given in an Australian Senate committee meeting regarding the perjury of Sir John Walsh may have influenced that choice of wording. Despite all this backdrop of ITNJ shenanigans, when it came to Robert David Steele’s federal civil court Amended Complaint, he complained that, “Defendant’s exhibit nothing but scorn for the Plaintiffs and the legal system. They call this action a ‘fake lawsuit’.”

Presumably, the Plaintiff thinks he is respectful of the United States federal court system by which he seeks a legal resolution of his complaint, despite his own questionable association with antigovernment sovereign citizen legal theorists.

Practitioners of sovereign citizen legal theories often include incarcerated felons and vexatious litigants who have caught the attention of the judicial system with their paper terrorism as well as the watchful eye of FBI investigators, so perhaps Steele should not press this assertion too far.

ITNJ Symbolism as representing occult concepts and Roman Catholic images

Let’s look at the symbols employed for the ITNJ, and their meaning.

The Pinecone symbol is used by occultists to represent the pineal gland, or the THIRD EYE which was opened in Adam and Eve when they believed and obeyed the subtilty of the serpent in the garden of Eden. Genesis 3:5 quotes the serpent as saying, “For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” Elsewhere in the Bible these “gods” are also known as judges.

From a distance, the six-sided logo for the ITNJ has an intertwined snake look. Many have observed the ostentatious gold throne chair for Chief Justice Sir John Walsh.

The Humanitad Free Press and the U. S. nonprofit Committee to Support the ITNJ (EIN 81-0804071 with principal officer Santiago Azpilueta of 17423 Spirit Lane SE, Yelm, WA) jointly publish an online magazine called The Sovereign Voice. The ITNJ.org website provides this answer to a common question:Here is another symbol of ITNJ:

Where else do we find these two birds combined with a giant pine cone? Here is a photo of the Fontana della Pigna, which is described in Wikipedia as “a former Roman fountain which now decorates a vast niche in the wall of the Vatican facing the Cortile della Pigna, located in Vatican City, in Rome, Italy.”

Paradoxical quandaries

Returning to our discussion of ITNJ Chief Counsel Robert David Steele, and his participation in the Westminster Seatings of April 16-18, 2018, a short video on the ITNJ YouTube channel can be viewed where Steele makes the following introductory remarks:

(1.20)…we have people in the United States of America that breed children in order to sell them and when they are sold, they come without birth certificates which means it’s easier to kill them and have no one ask where they are…

(1.36)…importing children by the plane load again children with no documentation…

(4.28) …the need to restore the sovereignty of We the People…

It seems the 2018 Westminster Seatings was seeking to make use of its American nonprofit status to provide a show as a court of inquiry, rather than displaying the workings of a formal judicial court, as intended in the beginning. Rebecca Cope and the American team of volunteers were working to set up a court system similar to existing legal courts, such as the grand jury model, but with added features to protect We the people from corrupt judges who are nonremovable from office. These efforts were thwarted by founder Sacha Stone, who preferred giving his ITNJ Chief Justice a life term, despite Sir John Walsh’s checkered history in Australia.

So this loosely organized “inquiry” put on their show last April, and Robert David Steele asserted that child trafficking in the United States is hidden using the method of not applying for birth certificates or other types of documentation. This statement is a peculiar one, given Steele’s alliance with sovereign citizens, for it is primarily the sovereign citizen movement in the United States that is defying the legal requirement for birth certificates for newborns.

In the past year I have been reading various legal documents posted in two of Robert Baty’s Facebook groups; Kent Hovind’s Worst Nightmare and Understanding The Baby Holm Case. The primary reason for my interest in these two groups is that the members provide many insights into real life anti-government individuals and groups, including tax protestors, sovereign citizens and anti-child protective services advocates.

It is these same anti-government ideologues that constantly accuse the government of child trafficking and kidnapping. Such accusations often are distorted information campaigns waged on social media platforms. On the lower end of the spectrum many of these false accusations come from felons, drug addicts, persons with poor parenting skills, etc. who are looking for a scapegoat for their own personal behavior. On the higher spectrum, we find a number of well-educated persons ranging from engineers, lawyers, former CIA agents, etc. who are promoting internet campaigns of unfounded accusations against legitimate authorities. All of this distracts from the serious issue of the criminal conduct of those in positions of power and authority.

Robert David Steele has asserted in his Amended Complaint that “he is a vocal advocate for the exposure and criminal prosecution of pedophiles and everyone who aids and abets such horrific crimes”. Yet during his 2017 #UNRIG campaign he made numerous undocumented, hearsay accusations against members of Congress. This raises the question about his own motives and methods of dealing with what should be the criminal prosecution of pedophiles, rather than the forgiveness of their transgressions without regard to the justice needed for victims of pedophilia.

On June 2, 2017 Joseph Ford Cotto did a series of interviews with Robert David Steele for the San Francisco Review of Books.com. His last one, Interview: X Spy Robert David Steele explains why Cynthia McKinney should be Donald Trump’s vice president, included the following words of Steele:Note that Robert David Steele’s motto with regard to Truth and Reconciliation is everyone gets the truth, no one goes to jail. This is a philosophical theme that is played out in the ITNJ public proceedings, when Chief Counsel Steele emphasized that “this is a court of inquiry, it’s not an adversarial court, it’s a non-profit educational event”. In other words, ITNJ is impotent as a judicial body, despite the first paragraph in the ITNJ Preamble of their Constitution, which declares Let this message go forth from this time and place to all the peoples of the world that to right the wrongs done to them and in vindication of their rights and the enforcement of just causes and to hold accountable those responsible for breaches of human rights it is proclaimed that the International Tribunal for Natural Justice is hereby established pursuant to this Constitution.

During the above San Francisco Review of Books interview, Robert David Steele claimed that “At least six top Republican Senators are world-class pedophiles who have probably participated in child ritual murder..”. Did Steele ever report his knowledge of these crimes to law enforcement officials in order to bring these so-called world-class pedophiles to justice?

The disregarding of the rules for evidence, which protect the accused from hearsay and false facts

Article 17 of the ITNJ Constitution is on Evidence and Admissibility, which gives the general rule allowing all evidence as admissible. There is a broad, and ill defined qualification to allow for dismissing frivolous complaints. However, because ITNJ is operating presently as a one-sided inquiry, rather than as a judicial court that weighs the reliability of evidence, this means that Hearsay evidence is admissible, without being subject to cross-examination by the person(s) being accused. Robert David Steele’s own statements about pedophilia involving members of the U. S. Congress appear to represent undocumented accusations and represent hearsay.

The threat to the uniqueness of America’s laws and jurisprudence by slipshod International Tribunals and foreign laws attempting to override common legal wisdom

Here are a few statements to ponder excerpted from a Fordham International Law Journal, Volume 29, Issue 3, Article 4, 2005 called Sovereignty and the American Courts at the Cocktail Party of International Law: The Dangers of Domestic Judicial Invocations of Foreign and International Law, by Donald J. Kochran. (linked here: fordham international law 2005

page 507: With increasing frequency and heightened debate, U. S. courts have been citing foreign and “international” law as authority for domestic decisions. This trend is inappropriate, undemocratic, and dangerous.

page 508 footnote 9: Professor Berkowitz explains: Critics raise a number of serious objections. First, officials of international institutions (to say nothing of NGOs) charged with promulgating international law lack democratic accountability…Second, as most international institutions –possessing neither police force nor military–lack the capacity to enforce their rulings and resolutions, their legal pronouncements are impotent and make a mockery of the rule of law…

page 513: When the British colonies in North America chose to cast off their chains by revolution, they chose to create a sovereign Nation-State that was beyond the shackles and controls of outside influences.

page 515: Importation of these over-laws in recent judicial decisions is entirely inappropriate for a country that has a constitution and a commitment to govern itself.

page 522: After describing multiple court rulings that would need to be overturned if the Court were to consistently rely on foreign sources of authority, Justice Scalia continued: The court should either profess its willingness to reconsider all these matters in light of the views of foreigners, or else it should cease putting forth foreigners’ views as part of the reasoned basis of its decisions. To invoke alien law when it agrees with one’s own thinking, and ignore it otherwise, is not reasoned decision-making, but sophistry.

page 526: As Judge Robert Bork has opined, the Framers may be turning over in their graves: “The most ominous aspect of Roper…is the Court majority’s reliance upon foreign decisions and unratified treaties…If the meaning of a document over 200 years old can be affected by the current state of world opinion, James Madison and his colleagues labored in vain.” It is a Constitution the courts should be expounding, not other people’s laws.

There is a battle presently being fought in our U. S. courts of law against sovereign citizen legal theories, which attempt to subvert time honored procedures for determining the facts and legal arguments in judicial proceedings. It is high arrogance for such individuals to establish international tribunals which tend to subvert justice in order to publicize extremely serious hearsay accusations against persons who are not provided the legal safeguards to ensure that justice and truth prevail in their case.

In Defiance of Jesus Christ, Rudy Davis’ Lonestar 1776 Prison Ministry Promotes the Whitewashing of Sovereign Citizen Mike Parsons’ Crimes and Contentious Behavior

Posted on July 9, 2018 by Jacquelyn Weaver

How hast thou counselled him that hath no wisdom? And how hast thou plentifully declared the thing as it is? To whom hast thou uttered words? And whose spirit came from thee? Job 26:3-4

On July 6, 2018 I received an email from Rudy Davis in regard to a video which he had published at his Lonestar 1776 YouTube channel titled, Mike Parsons asks Jacquelyn Weaver to Apologize, Retract, Correct Her Article. The article which they want to eliminate is my June 30, 2018 post called Sovereign Citizen Mike Parsons Demonstrates How Not To Make A Citizen Arrest.

I listened to Rudy Davis’ and Mike Parsons’ video; it is nothing more than 38 minutes of the ramblings of two men who are clueless as to where my Tracking the Leopard Meroz blog fits on their Sovereign Citizen Conspiracy World map.

The globe for the Hollow Mind.

On my Contact page I state, I welcome any comments, even those which disagree with me, as long as you sincerely explain your position.

I have never censored anyone’s opinions, if general rules of civility are observed. So boys, if you want me to apologize, retract or correct anything, try writing it out in plain English as a comment on the article you find fault with. Then perhaps I will be able to understand what your complaint is. Yesterday, I was told that another video was published on Lonestar 1776 which featured a recorded prison phone call from Mike Parsons speaking once again against Frater I*I and my person.

I will address one minor point which was mentioned in the first Lonestar 1776 video, since it leads into today’s article. Rudy Davis is of the opinion that as a King James Bible believer, I should have directly contacted Mike Parsons, a felon, before I wrote my article. Pardon me if I failed to perceive Parsons as a Christian saint after reading about his behavior that got him into jail, in the first place.

While the Bible has a procedure for dealing with differences between Christians that are of a personal nature, my article on Parsons was not personal but rather a means of educating and cautioning my readers against sovereign citizen ideologies, which are fraudulent at their foundation. Mike Parsons represents a real life example of a sovereign citizen taking it upon himself to affect a citizen’s arrest. The broader topic at hand involved the issuance of “international” citizen arrest warrants by sovereign citizen ideologues, as a means of retribution against their perceived enemies.

Mike Parsons has been taken under the wing of Rudy Davis’ prison ministry, which paints sovereign citizen criminals as innocent, persecuted Christian Patriots. The façade of this prison ministry is that of a King James Bible, Independent Fundamental Baptist form of religious speech. The late Dr. Peter S. Ruckman, a notable IFB preacher, was known for his prison ministry work, which included preaching the Bible in various prisons, by which he exhorted the doctrine of the genuine fruits of repentance.

In contrast, the Rudy Davis ministry, publishes on YouTube, phone calls from prisoners that encourage a continuation of self-serving falsehoods in regard to the facts of their cases. This failure on the part of Davis to not counsel repentance and remorse for the behavior that got these felons incarcerated is aggravated by the fact that Davis encourages his prisoners to malign those who accurately speak to the facts and evidence of their cases.

The Witness of American Jurisprudence

As I was reading State of Tennessee v. Michael W. Parsons, Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court of Tipton County No 6030 [No. W2010-02073-CCA-R3-CD-filed December 15, 2011], one sentence on page 18 stood out: “The Defendant also testified during cross-examination by the State that he is a ‘sovereign citizen’.”

As we see in this screenshot in another legal document (Memorandum and Order), Mike Parsons refers to himself as follows:As was stated on page 8 in 4:17-cr-03038-JMG-CRZ Findings, Recommendations and Orders filed 2/7/18, “Defendant (Michael Wayne Parsons) has not been afforded diplomatic status by the State Department of the United States, and he is not entitled to diplomatic immunity. And while he asserts he is not a United States citizen, Defendant is nonetheless subject to the laws of the United States for criminal conduct performed within this country. Defendant’s motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and on the basis of diplomatic immunity should be denied”.

So here we have the situation where Mike Parsons, who has denied that he is a United States citizen, is railing against two American citizens, Frater I*I and me, because we respect the laws of our nation, the law enforcement community, and the judges who have made reasoned decisions based on the facts and evidence and laws which pertained to his various criminal actions.

On page 26, of the first case noted above, it was stated, “Our close and painstaking review of the record before us demonstrates that, under the particular facts of this case, the Defendant was making an impermissible attempt to simultaneously represent himself and to have the counsel of his choice assist him in that endeavor. Additionally, the Defendant repeatedly engaged in systematic, calculated, delaying tactics and also engaged in attacks upon his lawyers and the trial judge in a concerted effort to obtain counsel of his own choosing, to which he is not entitled. We have concluded that the Defendant’s antics placed the trial court and the Defendant’s appointed attorneys in a no-win situation. Our careful, detailed review of the record demonstrates that the Defendant had no intention of following and/or accepting long-standing legal precedent. Instead, from the outset of these criminal proceedings, the Defendant engaged in an intentional pattern of obstinate, dilatory, bullying behavior in an effort to threaten, coerce, and egregiously manipulated the entire judicial system. We will not now hear the Defendant complain”.

On page 31, we read, “The Defendant also presented inconsistent narratives to the trial court. After writing a letter ‘firing’ Ms. Mills, the Defendant claimed to the trial court that it was she who initiated her withdrawal. After telling the trial court in very clear terms that he wanted to proceed pro se with advisory counsel, he subsequently told the court that he had not waived his right to counsel and demanded that counsel be appointed to represent him. As our Supreme Court has observed, ‘[d]isingenuous invocations of the right of self-representation that are designed to manipulate the judicial process constitute an improper tactic by a defendant and are not entitled to succeed.’ Hester, 324 S. W. .3d at 33. And, on the day of trial, the Defendant demanded another continuance.”

Finally, on page 32, “As did the defendant in Willis, the Defendant in this case used the tactic of refusing to communicate and/or cooperate with his lawyers; filing lawsuits against his lawyers; filing complaints with the Board of Professional Responsibility against his lawyers; and refusing to cooperate with a court-ordered evaluation. Additionally, the Defendant filed with law enforcement a complaint of assault against one of his lawyers; sued the trial judge; sued the district attorney; and sued the victims. This course of conduct was an egregious manipulation of the judicial system, and of the constitutional rights afforded to criminal defendants, in order to delay, disrupt, and prevent the orderly administration of justice…”.

In yet another legal document, Mike Parsons was described as “employing a convoluted discussion of English tense and grammar” in arguing for the dismissal of a “pending indictment”.

The Witness of the Bible

The Book of Romans, chapter 2, displays the seven great principles of God’s judgment, summarized as Truth, Accumulated guilt, Works, Without Respect of Persons, Performance-Not Knowledge, Secrets of the Heart, and Reality-Not Profession. In verse 8, a form of rebellious mindset, which is under the judgment of God, is described as, But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath.

It is self evident from reading various criminal case documents pertaining to Mike Parsons, that Rudy Davis’ assessment of this unrepentant and unremorseful felon as being a King James Holy Bible believing Christian is an attempt to whitewash the testimony of the public record which documents the facts, the evidence, and the legal reasoning, wherein Mike Parsons became incarcerated for his criminal actions. Rudy Davis is a partaker in the sins of Mike Parsons by virtue of his continual support of his falsehoods, which are allowed to be publicly broadcast on the internet, including threats of a lawsuit against Frater I*I for merely bringing forth archived court records.

One of the reasons why I am interested in the sovereign citizen groups which tout themselves as King James Bible believers, is that I never ran across such thinking in the IFB churches I was associated with. While I was a member of a moderate IFB church, I was also very well acquainted with the Pharisee church in the same city; but even in that case, the pastor preached that government was to be respected, and taxes were to be paid in accordance with IRS rules.

Sovereign Citizen ideology is not supported by the Scriptures, unless one takes it upon himself to privately interpret the Bible, removing verses from their context.

The book of Jude speaks of men who privily enter the church who despise dominion and speak evil of dignities. Sovereign Citizen ideology creates cults where the narcissistic individual, who disregards the rights of all others, can reign as king, judge, jury and executioner. We all can agree that all human institutions have corrupt persons who must be countered by standardized procedures, but in the world of the sovereign citizen, the concept of the corruption of governing agents is used like the ink of the squid, to provide a cover for their own personal wrongdoing.

The Book of Judges and Gideon’s Army

Rudy and Erin Davis of Forney, Texas who are known for their Lonestar1776 You Tube channel and year of jubilee.com,webpage claim that they are assisting American Political Prisoners. The common denominator of all of these so called American political prisoners is their Sovereign Citizen ideology, which ranges between hardcore believers and those on the fringe, whose criminal cases were negatively affected by sovereign citizen “legal” counsel.

year of jubilee.com Gideon’s Army

Rudy Davis has chosen Gideon’s Army as the motif for his year of jubilee website. The story of Gideon is found in the Old Testament book of Judges, chapters six and seven. During that time period in the history of Israel, the repeat theme is that when Israel “did evil in the sight of the LORD”, they were delivered as a nation into the hand of various oppressors until such time as God chose a Judge to be their deliverer.

In chapter 6, verse 12 we read a statement of the angel of the LORD, saying, The LORD is with thee, thou mighty men of valour. This has been a favorite saying of various Christian Patriot groups promoted through the Christian Alternative Media. We are entering into a realm where an “elite army of men” believe they are chosen to deliver an entire nation from oppression.

There are many important aspects to Gideon’s story, but Rudy Davis first chooses a partial sentence found in Judges 7:3 Whosoever is fearful and afraid, let him return…In choosing an army for Gideon, the LORD poses several tests which must be met; thus the troop numbers are diminished until 300 men are chosen to overcome the Midianites. Another theme of Rudy Davis is expressed in his Make Noise and Shine Light, which is taken from Judges 7:20. Once after making noise,in his videos on Obama, Rudy Davis was paid a personal visit from the Secret Service, who wanted to inquire as to whether he posed a real threat to the President.

Setting the Captives Free From God’s Point of View

The next image on the year of jubilee website makes use of several Scriptures, without identifying them for easy reference. I am assuming the title, Set the Captives Free is a play off of Luke 18, which was read by Jesus Christ in a Nazareth synagogue as he read Esaias, The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the broken hearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, to preach the acceptable year of the Lord.

The instruction is given, “Check out our list of brothers and sister in bonds below. Educate yourself about the cases. Most of them have been sentenced to “death by prison”. Find out why. Ask questions.” I have no idea how many persons have actually looked into the cases of the prisoners which are referenced on Rudy Davis’ website. I only know of one man who did just that, and because he has been posting his findings on YouTube, he is highly disliked by Rudy Davis. Of course, I am talking about Frater I*I, Keeper of the Orb and Gazer into the SovCit Abyss.

The Witness of Frater I*I Who Educated Himself on The Cases and Asked Questions

Frater I*I’s YouTube account has garnered over 25,000 views since March 6, 2018; but I suppose it was after he started emailing Rudy Davis about those cases, and asking questions, that the alarm bells started sounding off over at the Lonestar1776 prison ministry. Frater I*I has 155 subscribers as compared to Davis’ channel which has gathered over 17,000 over a nine year period. The problem with those statistics is that very few Rudy Davis subscribers even watch his videos; whereas Frater I*I views are growing in number.

Frater I*I’s Email to Rudy Davis

One of the Frater I*I emails which received a public response from Rudy Davis and Mike Parsons on a Lonestar 1776 video, was published recently by Robert Baty at his Facebook group Kent’s Hovind’s Worst Nightmare!.

The Lonestar 1776 and Mike Parson Response to Frater I*I

On July 3, 2018 Lonestar 1776 published their response, Mike Parsons (unsentenced) Defends Himself Against A Pack of Devilish Hyenas. At the 1.24 mark, Rudy Davis says, “…also this guy that I don’t even want to mention his name because I can’t stand to even mention his name but he sent me an email and he attached some sort of PDF file (linked here) and here’s what he said, he said, ‘His motions are denied in full though this is just a recommendation to the trial judge from the magistrate judge. It is rare they do not adopt them. This is bad for Parsons; he’s looking at 8 to 10 years if he is convicted due to his prison record and calling the jury in this matter. The best advice you can give him is to plead guilty if you truly consider him your friend’ and then he signs it via his traitorous signature, which I cannot stand so anyway just wanted you to be aware of that’.”

Mike Parsons: “Well, I don’t know what this traitor guy means by calling a jury, that, that’s an idiotic statement, nobody calls a jury, you know and the fact is, is that he keeps pushing for people to plead guilty which means that he’s obviously working for the prosecution because if he really cared about the public he would want to make sure somebody went to prison for a long, long time that is as guilty as he seems to think that I am. The fact is, he nothing but an evil lowlife vermin from the pit of hell liars.”

Rudy Davis: “Amen to that!”

Mike Parsons: “Maybe that isn’t a..”

Rudy Davis: “Amen.”

Mike Parsons: “… this, this guy is pond scum in the worst degree, now he claims that he can get a transcript of this hearing of the failure to appear. What he needs to get if he’s got the guts to do it, I would tell you to get an audio and post it both on the internet, the transcript and the audio and compare it because what you’ll find is that they have butchered the transcript and it does not comport to what the audio is, and that when I ask every one of the state’s witnesses, Do you have an order for me to appear in court, No, the answer is ‘No’, so how could you be convicted of failure to appear when the law clearly says you had to have an order to appear in court, a lawful order, that you fail to comply with. There was no order; that’s the whole point.”

“He dances around this like some slick attorney. He’s a professional liar and, you know if he claims to be studying to be an A & P mechanic–he’ll never make it because there’s no lying in that trade. I’ve got many of friends that are A & P mechanics and they are not liars-they are all about the truth and accuracy and he is nothing of the kind. He’s not truthful nor accurate.”

Rudy Davis: “You know, Mike, if I could just interject real quick. There’s a very popular documentary that just came out on the case of Darlie Routier. She was accused of stabbing both of her babies in Rowlett, Texas. What you’re saying about doctoring the transcripts, that was exactly the case in her case. It’s not surprising at all that you’re saying they doctored the transcripts, that they do that all the time.”

Mike Parsons: “Well, here’s the thing. This guy is, is stalking me, while I’m locked up and, and basically unable to deal with this fraud. He hides behind a screen name. He threatens me, he basically threatens me my wife, he insults me and my wife, and as well as chief justice Holland.[he is referring to Sue Holland, a so-called chief justice of the same fabled tribe he associates with. She is also in prison.] He insults the entire Chilcotin nation and the sovereignty of that nation.”

“He is, he’s relying on people’s ignorance of what the truth is and their laziness to not look at this stuff up, but if anybody, if what you sent me, a copy of that transcript, if he posted it, if anybody listening will review what he says, and then go to those pages and look for it, you’ll find it’s not there, plus you’ll find notations that Mrs. Parsons put in the margin of that transcript denying everything that he’s saying just because some cop who got fired for planting evidence, Michael Green, wasn’t there to testify so they had, the parole hearing read his report, that’s hearsay, he ought to know that, he ought to know better than that, that he’s a liar, so he’s not going to acknowledge it, that’s the problem with the guy.”

“Now if he will not expose his real name at least expose the name of your attorney, so that when I contact him, give me some kind of a way to let me, let him know who you are, so that when I can file my lawsuit against you, then we’ll be able to do battle like real men since you’re too much of a coward to step out of your closet. Now I never said you’re a pedophile, I said what you’re doing is supporting pedophiles because I’m helping natives get their children back from the foster care system which ranks with pedophiles and obviously you support those people so you must be a supporter of pedophiles, because if you’re opposing me, you’re supporting the other side, which is the pedophiles.”

“Now someone made a comment that you might be homosexual because you’re hiding in a closet. I don’t know that, you know I don’t care about that, I just care that you are committing libel and slander. Now it’s one thing for you to say in here that it, it’s not illegal for someone to insult you. No, insults or not, but posting false information there is willfully done with the intent of harming someone and painting a jury, that’s a crime. And sir, you’re criminal, you’re a fraud and a coward, you are no Marine, you have no integrity, you’re a scumbag.”

“Now he says that ‘he fully knew the kidnapping plot’, well, there was no plot, first of all, and second of all, I’m locked up for over a month while the indictments and the court orders for my release and the arrest warrants for those two people were issued just because you have a job as a judge and a sheriff for a corporation does not immune you from prosecution by a court. The fact is that under color of law, crimes committed by these people can get them put in prison and an international warrant issued and served upon a law enforcement, in this country is what they did which is lawful, you ought to know that, if you do your homework, but the thing is you know it’s lawful, you’re just a liar, you’re going to spread false information to people who won’t read the information.”

“Now you put in here little excerpts, I don’t believe a word of it that you’ve got in here, you claim these people that work with my wife made these statements. I don’t believe a word of it that you’ve got in here, you claim these people that work with my wife made these statements. I don’t know this to be true, but I guarantee you I’m going to ask that Pat would provide some kind of a response to these statements to see if those were in fact true or not, I don’t know if she even saw those. If she did, they’re not true. I’ve never verbally abused anybody in my life, but maybe I’ll make an exception to your case.”

“Alright, but otherwise there is no mental distress, there is no manipulation. She’s upset about the abuse by Tipton County government who’s been hounding me for the last 14 years because I dared to sue to expose a rigged election. Do your homework once again. You’ll find out that I’ve never been in jail or anything until all of a sudden when I sue to challenge the election, then we’re attacked and uh even when the grand jury when I was falsely accused for punching a guy in the nose, yeah, when, when somebody attacks me, yeah, I’ll fight back, whether it’s in court or wherever you attack my family, you got a fight. If you want to fight, bring it on.”

“Step out of the closet you hide yourself in, behind a screen name, chump. I’m locked up in a jail, I don’t have access to a computer. The fact is, is that you’re a coward, I guarantee you that if you step out and give me your lawyer’s name, I will contact him and I’ll make sure that I file it properly. The lawsuit will be in your proper name sent to your proper address or to your attorney, either way. That’s fine. Makes me no difference, but what you’ve done is a crime, sir. You’re a coward and a criminal, you’re supporting other criminals. Now the rest of the letter is pathetic and again anyone out there that’s reading just nonsense, it’s false information. He puts in here operative word, she seems to have told her co-workers, well there’s no seeming to it, she didn’t tell them anything except about the abuse by Tipton County.”

“So we’ll get a copy of this and she will have the ability to respond. Otherwise, in the number six, he says ‘he fully had access to the house in question’. That’s not true. I didn’t even have a key to the thing when I travel, Mrs. Parsons has the only key. The house is in her control, that way she can have her guns there unlocked in the safe so can easily access in case some lowlife like you comes up, tries to mess with her and she can blast you back in the pit of hell from which you came from, you low life coward, but regardless of that, the fact is, is that she has a right to bear arms so as the rest of my family, so stay away from them. And he seems to think that they’re going to talk about find a –there’s nothing in there about finding a rifle anywhere. That’s not in there.”

“Oh, and please call the FAA, you moron, to tell them that this is a transport plane that’s owned by another country being moved out of this country. It is, it not a fact that you are supposed to cover the N number because it’s no longer registered in the United States. There is no registration required when you’re not a U. S. citizen and it’s going to another country, moron.”

Rudy Davis: “They’re a pack of devilish hyenas, you nailed it on the head and uh I pray that justice comes to them…there is a group in a pack of devilish hyenas that seems to take great pleasure. They hide behind anonymous screen names in the destruction of Mike and Pat’s life and uh they seem to be obsessed with you know, every little detail and finding fault in every little word and you know raising accusations and it’s upsetting Mike a great deal. Me personally, I don’t have time to get into the details of the situation here. I have too many other prisoners that need my attention, and so Mike can fight his own battles. I do pray that Mike gets his freedom soon and I have no doubt that Mike will sweep the floor with the whole pack of devilish hyenas that have come against him.”

Praying For Justice, When You Are The One In The Wrong

Will Mike Parsons “sweep the floor”? I would like to remind Rudy Davis of Isaiah 28:16-17, Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold I lay in Zion for a foundation, a stone, a tried stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste: Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.

When one prays for Justice, it is not something to ask for in pride… for when it comes forth from the holy throne of mercy, you may wish you had pondered your prayer request with a humble heart.

Sovereign Citizen Mike Parsons Demonstrates How Not To Make A Citizen Arrest

Posted on June 30, 2018 by Jacquelyn Weaver

The previous Tracking the Leopard Meroz article ended with the YouTube channel Virgo Triad having an international arrest warrant issued against her for attempted murder for the crime of identifying as a “sovereign citizen”, sovereign citizen John Harold Fulks, the self-appointed Governor of the United States of America. After the FBI decided to consider Fulk’s illegal arrest warrant as a call for a hit against the life of Virgo Triad, Fulks published a June 19, 2018 notice at reign of the heavens.com declaring that the Virgo Triad case had been transferred to their Human Rights Tribunal (HRT), thus suspending the arrest warrant. By this new action, the penalty for each HRT violation is a $750,000 fine.

The original arrest warrant had included instructions that “any and all are hereby authorized to detain, incarcerate, and in the case of violent resistance, use deadly force against proclaimed and verified owner and operator Virgo Triad”. Now that this warrant has been suspended, we can breathe a sigh of relief that it has been replaced by a more humanitarian extortionist demand.

Today’s post is going to explore what a sovereign-citizen-style Citizen’s Arrest looks like in real life. But first, whenever we observe persons involved in this ideology, it must be remembered that many are separate and distinct from each other, and operate under their own “legal” entities which grant them “governing” authority. The subject of today’s article, Michael Wayne Parsons, claims to be an ambassador and associate chief justice of the T’shilhqot’n nation, a dubious entity which is not legally recognized by the United States.

At mikeparsons.org, his About page describes him as follows:

As we shall see, below the surface of an impressive sounding resume, Parsons’ sovereign citizen style situation ethics landed him in great trouble, where today he sits incarcerated in a Nebraska prison. There are a number of criminal court documents involving the arrest and conviction of Michael Wayne Parsons in the matter which we are going to review. However, for expediency, I will be relying on Michael Parsons’ appeal of the ruling of Judge Joseph H. Walker, which can be read at this link: Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee at Jackson Case No. W2019-02073-CCA-R3-CD filed 12/15/2011.

According to the appeals document, Michael W. Parsons was “indicted on July 7, 2008, with two counts of aggravated kidnapping, two counts of aggravated assault committed knowingly, one count of burglary of a vehicle, and two counts of theft under $500.” After a jury trial where Parsons represented himself with the assistance of elbow counsel, he was convicted of two counts of aggravated assault, one count of burglary of a vehicle, and two counts of theft under $500. On appeal, Parsons claimed 5 errors; however, after review, the court held “that the defendant is entitled to no relief” and the trial court’s judgments were affirmed.

Michael Parsons had been raising wolf-hybrids, but on September 24, 2007, several had escaped through a fence, running over to the neighboring property where Barry Laxton was mowing the yard. Laxton got his .22 rifle and fired into the air to scare the wolf-hybrids away. This was successful, except that one lone animal charged him, and he shot it. During this time, Michael Parsons and his wife, Pat Parsons were out looking for their animals. The wolf-hybrid which had been shot ran to the defendant and died. In the meantime, Barry Laxton had joined Nick King, who was working on another yard.

In the Appeals document which I have linked to above, on page 2, under Factual and Procedural Background, the core of our Citizen Arrest story is described as follows:

The Defendant accosted Laxton and King, pointed his handgun at them, and told them he was making a citizen’s arrest. At this point, the Defendant was no longer on his own property. The Defendant wore an audio-recording device that recorded the encounter. The recording was played for the jury and transcribed. The encounter lasted about four minutes.

At the beginning, the Defendant demands, “Where’s my other dogs?” King responds, “put the gun down.” The Defendant asks, “Where’s your gun at? Drop your gun.” King replies, “It’s a gun in-” and the Defendant states, “Drop your gun. Turn around. Turn around. On the ground. On the ground.” King again says, “Put your gun down.” The Defendant then says, “You’re under arrest. On the ground. I’ll shoot you.” King says again, “Put your gun down.” The Defendant says, “On the ground. You, too, on the ground now, or you will be shot. Five, four, three.”

Laxton says something indiscernible, and the conversation continues in the same vein with the Defendant insisting that the men are under arrest and King repeatedly telling the Defendant to put his gun down. At one point, the Defendant says, “If you grab that gun, I’m going to shoot.” The defendant also tells the men to get away from the truck, to “[t]urn around, to [f]ace down,” and to “[l]ay down.” King calls 911 and tells the dispatcher that he needs assistance because he is “being held at gunpoint”. The Defendant orders King to [t]ell them Mark Parsons has a citizen’s arrest on these two.”…

The Defendant again asserts that they are under arrest.

Some years later, Michael Parsons had his parole revoked under warrant No. 14-CR-314 where he was heard in the General Sessions Court of Tennessee for the 25th Judicial Circuit at Covington on February 11, 2016. He had been charged with being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm.

KRVN.com published an article on May 1, 2017, Indictments Unsealed Against Arapahoe Man & Tennessee Man Charging Felon in possession of a firearm and misprision of felony. It mentions that Michael Wayne Parsons, age 55 of Arlington, Tennessee, is charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm. Specifically, it alleges Parsons, after conviction of the felony offense of aggravated assault on November 23, 2009, in the Circuit Court of Tipton County, Tennessee was located in Nebraska on January 11, 2017, while in possession of a Rock River 5.56 LAR-15 assault rifle and 637 rounds of ammunition. The charge carries a possible penalty of up to 10 years’ imprisonment, a $250,000 fine or both.”

While possession of a firearm by a felon is serious, the above article features another incident involving Mike Parsons and his friend, Sue Holland, and others who had concocted a plot to break Parsons out of prison and arrest and kidnap the sheriff of Furnas County and the presiding judge in Tipton County, Tennessee. This is summarized by the U. S. Attorney’s Office in the May 1, 2017 KRVN article, as seen below:

Indictments Unsealed KRVN 5/1/2017 article by U. S. Attorney’s Office

The Appeals document linked in the beginning of this article is 48 pages long, and if one is not familiar with the sovereign citizen mindset when it comes to legal proceedings, the summary of Michael Parsons’ dealings with the court in this particular case is insightful as a predictor of later events.

Rudy and Erin Davis of the Lonestar1776 YouTube channel, which is a feature of their prison ministry, have taken up the cause of Mike Parsons. Rudy Davis has been referenced before in this blog, in connection to Kent Hovind’s tax protester problems for which he was previously incarcerated for nine years, as well as other jailed sovereign citizens and their causes. I use the word causes rather than cases, for the Lonestar 1776 channel is known for promoting a highly slanted view of the facts.Before anyone experiences a wave of sympathy sweeping over them for Mike Parsons’ plight, on page 47 of the Appeals document linked to earlier in this post, we are reminded of several factors: “the Defendant’s refusal to recognize that his actions were wrong”, “his persistent and unrelenting attempts to blame others for his conduct”, “Defendant took it upon himself to accost Laxton and King – a completely innocent bystander-with a loaded gun, point the weapon at them, and threaten to shoot them.”, “the circumstances of the offense were ‘particularly troublesome’ where defendant held a gun six inches from victim’s head”, and “prior troubles with his neighbors due to previous escapes of his wolf-hybrids, as well as his willingness to file questionable legal proceedings against persons he deems to have wronged him in some way”….

On June 27, 2018, Lonestar 1776 published an audio called Mike Parsons (unsentenced) Call from Nebraska Prison. Erin Davis received a phone call from the Douglas County jail, giving the usual prison warning, this call is from a corrections facility and is subject to monitoring, recording, and a location of your phone will be obtained.

Ironically, Mike Parsons’ first words are “I don’t consent to recording of my call”. This, coming from a guy who had recorded his citizen’s arrest, which when the audio was presented to a jury, they found that it had preserved convincing evidence of Parsons’ guilt in that incident. Erin ignores Mike’s I do not consent statement, and proceeds to not only record his phone call, but publish it on YouTube!

The first words from Erin mention one of Parsons’ latest bug-a-boos; the Youtube channel called Frater I*I, which recently began to post audios from Mike Parson’s trial testimony, along with other sovereign citizen expose style documentation.

At the 1.10 mark of the June 27, 2018 audio, Mike Parsons says, “Well, I got some information from across the water and it was a reference to a YouTube video that’s he’s got on there that’s got a photo of me; it looks like it was taken at the CCA in Kansas-Leavenworth and so obviously if this guy’s got contacts like that he must be tied in with US Marshall Service. He’s either with the US Marshall’s or with the US Attorney. That’s the only sources that would have that-you don’t get people’s intake photos from you know for their ID’s unless you’re tied in with those companies and the only people on the outside, it would be with the US Marshall and US Attorney, that’s it.”

“So this guy is a government troll; he’s on the payroll no matter what anybody thinks or says and something about, he’s got website about Kent Hovind’s Worst Nightmare or something, so this is apparently if it’s that guy that’s name you referenced unless that’s just another screen name. You know these guys are masters of lies and deception; their whole, whole opera..operation is nothing but a lie. It’s lies built upon lies, they’re masters of the art of deception and lies.”

“That’s what Satan is, the master of deception but anyway, uh yeah this is not just some flake and sitting in a basement down there twiddling his thumbs doing internet searches, this guy’s on the payroll and it’s all about destroying someone’s character because when you can’t defeat them legally, legitimately, you have to destroy their character and hope that people out there pick up on this stuff and all he’s doing is parodies what he’s been told by other people.”

“The guy is totally ignorant of everything. I mean the reference that he makes totally ignorant and he claims that he’s got copies of the audios of the phone recording so well the only way he could have gotten that is from the US Attorney, US Marshall or the Sheriff’s Department and I guarantee you the Sheriff’s Department is not putting that stuff out there because they could be sued. I guarantee it’s the US Marshall, the US Attorney.”

“The US Attorney is, I believe basically trying to you know of course US Marshall works for the US Attorney, so they’re conspira..conspiring to basically destroy my character or try to, of course people that don’t that read this stuff, it sounds good and unless you do a little bit of homework and you realize, Oh another country does have the right to have their own court, they do have the right to issue warrants for the arrest when thy get an indictment and they do have the right to contact fugitive recovery agencies to that, that country’s law enforcement to arrest those people irrespective of what they believe. Judges are not immune…”(4.10)

Tracking the Leopard Meroz comment: Parsons is complaining that the YouTube channel Frater I*I has used a photo of him that is not publicly available, and therefore he concludes that the owner of this channel is receiving a paycheck from the government as a troll associated with the US Marshall/US Attorney departments. However, I found the same photo in an article dated May 1, 2017 posted by krvn.com, with a US Attorney’s Office byline, and the photo of Mike Parsons was a courtesy of the Furnas County Sheriff’s Office.

krvn.com May 1, 2017 article “Indictments Unsealed Against Arapahoe Man & Tennessee Man Charging Felon in possession of a firearm and misprision of felony” by U. S. Attorney’s Office

What bothers me about the Rudy and Erin Davis prison ministry is that they do not attempt to provide a prisoner, such as Mike Parsons, who has limited access to the outside world, with accurate information. Parsons is going on about his photo, and surmising falsely about who has access to it, and this is feeding into his paranoia. The YouTube channel Frater I*I is well within his rights to publish this photo which is in the public domain, and also to provide audio clips which can be obtained through PACER on court cases.

Parsons has accused Robert Baty, the founder of the Facebook group Kent Hovind’s Worst Nightmare, of being Frater I*I. I have read some of the comments by Frater who claims he was in the US Marines some 20 years ago, which Robert Baty never was. Baty is a retired IRS Appeals Officer, and his internet comments from years back can be read in multiple locations. Baty’s speech patterns are very distinguishable and do not match the style of Frater I*I.

Mike Parsons refers to arrest warrants “from another country”. By this he means to justify his false credentials granted by the fabled T’shilhqot’n nation, of which he claims he is an ambassador (diplomatic immunity) and associate chief justice who can legally issue arrest warrants. What justification is there for plotting to kidnap a law enforcement officer and a judge? Rudy and Erin Davis, who as Christians are held to a high standard, are complicit in his imaginings because it appears they make no attempt to correct Parsons’ misconceptions and false reasoning in regard to others. When Parsons speaks of others as the masters of deception and ignores his own lies and false reasoning, he not only does not have a case, he does not have a cause.

The very next day, on June 28, 2018, Lonestar 1776 published another phone call from inmate Mike Parsons. This time it is Rudy Davis who answers the phone and at the 1.20 mark, he says to Parsons, “the other thing is I don’t know what to call him, I don’t even, I hate bringing it even up, this traitor, yeah, OK, I hate bringing up his name, but he’s asking if he can take the last two calls where you discuss him and you, I, I, have one call where it says “Mike Parsons tells Frater off”. He wants to put that on his channel and I said that’s a decision that you will have to make; that’s not a decision I will make.”

Mike Parsons: (1.42) “No, I don’t authorize a sociopath to do anything with any of my images or voice. I’m warning him to immediately remove his channel that has a photograph of me that was inadvertently taken by somebody at a detention facility. I did not consent to that, I do not consent to him posting it publicly and I demand that you remove it immediately from the internet, delete it from his files and forget he ever heard my name.”

Rudy Davis then informs Parsons that he has screenshotted frater I*I‘ YouTube channel for the record.

For the record, who is probably the largest provider of audio recordings of Mike Parsons on the internet, besides the ones which are found in the public court records? How about Lonestar 1776, which publishes recordings of Mike Parsons, despite the fact that he does not consent to having his voice recorded. Mr. Parsons, let your speculative talents run wild on that one.

The Context, The Whole Context, and Nothing but the Context? So, Douglas Hagmann, What is the CONtext of Your Promoting Victurus Libertas, as they Unveil the Freedom Revolution?

Posted on January 19, 2018 by Jacquelyn Weaver

On the December 12, 2017 Hagmann Report, Dave Daubenmire commented to Doug Hagmann, “…you know for people to take stuff out of context-you guys get a lot of that stuff as well. Those who aren’t watching my show every day and don’t understand what, what came before this morning’s program are not, not going to understand what it is that we’re talking about.”

Dave Daubenmire, Steve Quayle, Doug and Joe Hagmann, Sheila Zilinsky, V the Guerrilla Economist and others all portrayed Kent Hovind, aka Dr. Dino of Dinosaur Adventure Land, as a man persecuted for his religious beliefs. This Massive Skeleton in The Closet of the Christian Alternative Media is going to haunt them as they promote their anti-government rhetoric, no matter how much they try to bend reality to hide their unloosing of the Sovereign Citizen Movement.

CONTEXT refers to those parts of writing or speech coming before or after a statement, which contribute to the full meaning intended by the author or speaker. An argument which narrows the words of a speaker or writer to the extent that the true intention and meaning has been altered, becomes falsehood.

Thus, as I was reading the motions for dismissal filed December 15, 2017 in an ongoing lawsuit, it was interesting to observe that one defendant’s attorney was arguing that the plaintiff had failed to provide the entire context of certain statements which had been made by the defendants. On the same day, a transcript of the entire radio broadcast in question was provided to the Court by the other co-defendant, in order to give the complete context of the quotations.

Since this is an ongoing lawsuit, I am not going to identify the details, but suffice it to say, that in my “unlearned ordinary citizen” opinion, that when the attorneys for the defendants decided to put into the legal record, the full context of the contested words, they opened a closet door which allowed an embarrassing skeleton to fall out. For the very first item in the broadcast under scrutiny, regarded the 2015 legal problems of Kent Hovind. At that time, Hovind had already served 8 plus years in jail for tax fraud, but in this broadcast, he was being held up as an innocent man who had been persecuted by the IRS and the judicial system because of his religious beliefs.

The Skeleton In The Closet of Christian Alternative Media, Kent Hovind aka Dr. Dino, suffers from amnesia whenever anyone mentions his sovereign citizen beliefs.

Some of Hovind’s legal and tax problems had stemmed from his reliance on the counsel of various persons involved in the Sovereign Citizen Movement who are anti-government and who consider themselves above the law.

It is curious that an attorney who is attempting to show that his client’s controversial words against a plaintiff were within the legal boundaries of protected free speech, would place on the Court record, documentation which proves that the CONTEXT of the contested words included a defendant’s public misrepresentation of the facts of a lawsuit involving Kent Hovind, who was both a civil and criminal law-breaker.

The context of one’s words and actions is indeed an interesting topic to examine, especially where the subject has developed a severe case of amnesia with regard to their own personal history. (See this short video for a reproval of Kent Hovind’s statement that he does not know what a sovereign citizen is).

As I scan the panorama of the recurring themes of the Christian Alternative Media over the years, the antigovernment rhetoric which is routinely pushed onto Christian audiences, is beginning to standout as the silhouette of the false legal theories of the Sovereign Citizen Movement. This will become apparent as we take a cursory look at the website and broadcasts of Victurus Libertas, which one of my readers asked me to review. I had noticed this site when I had written about Robert David Steele and his #UNRIG campaign. But when I went in for a closer look, I was surprised by what I found that ties VL into the Sovereign Citizen worldview.

One has to wonder why 5 months ago the Hagmann Report, which claims 70 million downloads a year, decided to promote one of Robert David Steele’s favored internet broadcast co-hosts, Jim and Angie Blake of Victurus Libertas to greater prominence. VL now has 65,000 YouTube subscribers, which is 63% of the 103,000 subscribers which the long standing and the very popular Hagmann Report attracts. One of the things which the Hagmanns, Robert David Steele, and Victurus Libertas share in common, is that in the recent past they all had heavily pushed the fake Pedogate stories into the public view.

On the surface, Victurus Libertas presents the image of believing in God, as their motto is based on Romans 8:31. Yet, as we shall later observe, their governing principle is in fact based on that opposing principle of God called Mammon.

Note that the Scriptures say, IF. In the case of Angie and Jim Blake, that “If” is a very large IF.

THE FREEDOM PROJECT

At the Victurus Libertas.com website, owners Jim and Angie Blake claim that they are in the process of unveiling the Freedom Project, declaring “This is a MIND BLOWING project that will cost you absolutely NOTHING except exiting the Matrix. In fact, you will be guaranteed sustainability and security against those who impose against us now.”

On this undated page titled, The Freedom Revolution, the Blakes claim that, “Last week, out of nowhere, we were contacted by an individual who has the means, the plans, the ideology AND the resources to help us all achieve what we so desperately want and need to do in order to free ourselves from the chains of the federal, state and local governments who have illegally enslaved us…Every Tuesday a new portion of insight will be released leading up the final unveiling of the project in it’s entirety-which is expected to be completed in early 2018. The revolution is HERE. How you deal with it is up to you. You can do nothing and hope for the best, or you can control your own destiny and be a PART of the FREEDOM REVOLUTION!”

WHAT, NO VERIFIABLE CREDENTIALS?

Angie Miesner Blake, wife of James Anthony Blake, refers to her Twitter account as Mrs. jab, and she says, “I am a truth seeker”.

Jim and Angie Blake reveal little of themselves, except that on their Facebook pages it appears that they live in Fort Worth, Texas, were married in 2009,and have 6 children between them from prior relationships. Without any supporting evidence, they claim to be activists, truthers, investigative reporters, and even critical thinkers. Angie admits to having once been employed with Parkway Tavern, and Jim reveals on his Facebook page that he made an unpleasant discovery in the men’s room at some unknown job location. That’s quite a resume!

James Anthony Blake, host of Victurus Libertas, leaves us guessing as to his employment history. So a rough guess is that he is in his late forties and embarrassed to tell others what type of work he has done for the past 20 years

In September of 2017, the Hagmann Report featured a special interview of Jim and Angie Blake to discuss their Youtube broadcast channel, Victurus Libertas. This promotion from The Hagmann Report, as well as the repeated guest interviews of former CIA agent, Robert David Steele and former Congress woman, Cynthia McKinney, helped to advance their visibility and credibility. But without a proper resume of Jim and Angie Blake’s employment history, we will have to rely once again on the vetting skills of the premier father/son private investigator team, Doug and Joe Hagmann, whose famous words of assurance, Trust me, folks!, caused their listeners to gloss over various fake “Insider” sources.

It needs to be noted that Victurus Libertas (VL) also has relied on unnamed Insiders as their sources. One of them claimed to be from the DHS, which caused me to wonder if Doug Hagmann’s Rosebud or DHS Insider, was being recycled. And then there is FBI ANON…. Hagmann has claimed to have once worked undercover as a FBI operative, so I guess we should ask him to vet that person’s credentials.

MEMBERSHIP FEES: THE DOOR TO INSIDER ENGAGEMENT (something Ex-Con Tax Defier, former IRS Agent, Sherry Peel Jackson knows all about)

On the VL website which Angie heads as the Editor-in-chief, a page on Membership Levels provides a door to their world of secret insider sources. The Basic Membership is $2 per month to support their efforts to “bring the truth forward for all to see while exposing corruption”. This level gives the member “access to ALL worldwide news stories, be included in the weekly newsletter to stay updated on the website, as well as the VL Channel and you will have first access to EXCLUSIVE interviews from our CREDIBLE INSIDE SOURCES before anyone else.”

The Gold Membership is $5 per month which gives the Basic package plus “In addition, you will have access to 1-HIGHLY EXCLUSIVE interview per month, in which YOU will ask questions of a POLITICAL EXPERT, such as Robert David Steele, Field McConnell or possibly even Ron Paul. We will have these HIGHLY EXCLUSIVE interviews set up each month….Your name will be used when we present the questions. It will be just like you are interacting directly (with) the expert!”

The website, Galactic Connection.com featured a May 15, 2017 Victurus Libertas Channel Update called Under Attack But We Will Not Quit-Targeted Individuals. As shown below, Readers and Viewers of VL can ask FBI ANON their own questions.

Galactic Connection.com also advertises, Unplug from the Matrix! Remove your controlling implants!

In the above screenshot, the Blakes ask for prayers, saying, “I never knew what the term targeted individuals meant until now. I have empathy for all those that have been targeted by the deep state for telling the truth and exposing evil. Pray for all those that have the courage to take on the swamp creatures.” In the post dated May 16, 2017, which accompanies the video, Angie says, “We are fortunate and grateful to work with some really great insiders who want the truth to come out about the inner workings of our governments. FBI Anon, most known for showing up on 4Chan from time to time with his AMA, has agreed to allow our audience to ask questions…”.

That is, those may ask who have paid for the $5/month Gold Membership. When I was writing about Robert David Steele several months ago, I noticed that he limited his communications with the public by stipulating that he would only answer emails where the writer was also a supporter; i.e., gave him money for his #UNRIG campaign. Some of the donations he received for Earth Intelligence Network he used to fund the various YouTube broadcasters which interviewed him.

So why would Field McConnell of Abel Danger, or “even Ron Paul” want to buy into this exclusive interview situation which might be viewed by only a handful of persons? Well, Field McConnell has interviewed Sovereign Citizen “Judge” Anna Von Reitz, which is a common denominator with the Victurus Libertas website. And we do not know if Ron Paul is even aware that his name has been dropped for commercial purposes by the Blakes.

Many Tax Defiers and Sovereign Citizen Believers Prefer the MLM model of defrauding their customers

There is an interesting link between Sovereign Citizens and the use of MLM companies; one example which had been noted by this blog was that of Ernest Land, the Director of Creation Science Evangelism Ministries, connected with tax fraud Kent Hovind.

The exclusive interview method of enticing members as used by VL, has the overtones of a common MLM strategy, where if the participant gets to a certain level, the customer gains access to an online resource center where certain vendors are allowed an exclusive arrangement. Whether selling MLM Zurvita energy drinks, or VL Mugs, hoodies and shirts, or Sherry Peel Jackson’s Healthy Place products, Victurus Libertas raison d’être is for commercial profit. Truth is subordinate to commercial profit at Victurus Libertas; it is just another commodity to be bought and sold, like an over priced coffee mug.

The New Freedom Revolutionaries drink their coffee from a 16-ounce blood red mug for $14.99

Healthy Place’s Sherry Peel Jackson was once involved in the MLM Pinnacle Quest International (PQI), which got into legal problems with the Department of Justice. PQI was discussed in an October 12, 2010 article by Steve Rhode, called, Promoters of Debt Elimination and Tax Relief Scheme Get Hard Jail Time. Rhode explains, “PQI was an umbrella organization for numerous vendors of tax and credit card debt elimination scams. Some of the PQI vendors, such as Southern Oregon Resources Center for Education (SORCE), sold bogus theories and strategies for tax evasion. For fees starting at $10,000 SORCE assisted its customers in the creation of a series of sham business entities in the United States and Panama. Other tax-related PQI vendors denied legitimacy of the income tax system on various theories and provided customers with a “reliance defense” that consisted of a paper trail of frivolous correspondence which a client could allegedly use as evidence of good faith if the client were prosecuted”.

Steve Rhode also notes that one of the speakers on the PQI’s Q1 audio course included “Sherry Peel-Jackson, a tax defier“. He goes on to say, “These individuals make false and fraudulent statements about the internal revenue laws..”.

In the screenshot below, Jim and Angie Blake of Victurus Libertas extol ex-con Sherry Peel Jackson as one of their heroes; therefore they have partnered with her to sell her Healthy Place products.

Sherry Peel Jackson is now out of prison, but nine years ago on September 11, 2008, the Department of Justice had issued a news release headlined, Four Year Prison Sentence Affirmed for Georgia Tax Defier: Former IRS Employee Convicted of Tax Crimes. This notice begins, “The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a four-year prison sentence for tax defier crimes committed by Sherry Peel Jackson, a former Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employee and tax preparer, the Justice Department announced today.”

The DOJ press release explained, “…beginning in 2000, Jackson willfully and intentionally did not file her own individual tax returns. At that time, she also operated a tax preparation business and continued to prepare, submit and file individual tax returns for her customers. For the next three years, Jackson intentionally did not file her tax returns, despite an income of more than $400,000 in that time period…In May 2008, a federal court in Florida found Jackson to have been advancing frivolous tax arguments at a Pinnacle Quest International (PQI) sales conference and in PQI promotional materials. The court barred PQI and its principals from publicizing tax fraud schemes.”

Victurus Libertas features 3 interviews with Sherry Peal Jackson; the one on August 28, 2017 proclaims, Former IRS Agent Sherry Peel Jackson Reveals Her New Master Plan For Being Debt-Free and Healthy, and the April 23, 2017 interview was titled, Exclusive-Former IRS Agent, Sherry Peel Jackson Exposes Income Tax/Federal Reserve Connection.

Given the past history with the fraudulent MLM PQI, and the tax defier conviction and imprisonment of Jackson, I cannot understand how Victurus Libertas can view her counsel as worthy of consideration. But perhaps it has to do with their admission that they endorse the legal theories put forth by Anna Von Reitz, who is well known in Sovereign Citizen circles.

An Interview with self-proclaimed Superior Court Judge Anna Von Reitz aka Anna Maria Riezinger

On December 6, 2017 Victurus Libertas posted their full interview of Judge Anna Von Reitz on YouTube. Then on December 16, 2017, Jim Blake claimed that they were being “targeted and attacked after (their) interview with Judge Anna Von Reitz”. In the comment section, the Blakes added this information: “FAQ – What kind of targeting? – A. Petty Vandalism, Electromagnetic, 3 dead batteries at the same time, Financial (not disclosing at this time), Prank phone calls by Private #’s, door knocking, window tapping…Also feel like a spiritual battle going on”.

One person commented that they were praying in the name of Jesus for them, and “I bind those targeting you!”, while another offered some white witchcraft advice, saying, “Stay full of love and compassion for each other and the ones around ya, the scalar energy weapons and phyic(sp) attacks are more or less beat the same way, Practice the good energy Magic I have used the defense spells successfully…basically a boosted prayer”. Jim Blake also quoted a scripture in the book of Revelation about the inability of anyone to close a door which God opens, and also their Victurus Libertas motif, If God is for us, who can be against us?

The Full Interview began with an advertisement for their 16 ounce mug and shirts, and at the 1.15 mark, Angie says, “Hey guys, I’m so excited tonight, our guest is a state Superior Court Judge…”.

The very first statement of the interview is a lie, and Angie Blake, if she were honest would have stated that their guest, Anna Von Reitz, has falsely claimed to be a State Superior Court Judge of Alaska. But I suppose their guest would not have granted an interview at all, unless the co-hosts had pledged to lie on her behalf. According to Snopes.com on December 10, 2015 The Mind Unleashed published an article that had discussed the actions of “Judge” Anna Von Reitz’s attempt to get U. S. Marshalls and the FBI to arrest Congress and the President. In the screenshot below, we see this “Judge” title discussed.

quote taken from The Mind Unleashed 12/10/2015 article, “Judge Calls For US Marshalls & FBI to arrest Congress & the President”

At this juncture of the Victurus Libertas interview, there is a distinct fork in the road. If you want to honor and exalt a LIAR who claims she is an Alaskan Superior Court Judge, listen to the rest of the interview. If you prefer to stay within the bounds of reality, click the interview off. I am not surprised that after publicly endorsing a woman who is delusional, that the Blakes are hearing tapping on the windows, etc. which they call targeting.

Victurus Libertas has entered the twilight zone known as the Sovereign Citizen Movement. Except don’t ever call Judge Anna a sovereign citizen, she prefers state national. Her website is Anna Von Reitz.com, and I have been reading some of her articles and noting the links to other sites, which I will comment on at a future date, as I continue to review the antigovernment biases of the Christian Alternative News Media.

Here is what Jim Blake summed up in his Targeted and Attacked video: “Well, folks, it’s become painfully obvious that for the last 2 weeks we have been targeted by some very bad people and some people that did not like the message that was disseminated a couple of weeks ago by Judge Anna Von Reitz in an interview that we did, an hour and fifty minutes that we did with her a couple of weeks ago and if you haven’t seen it, you need to, because it is a well of information, it’s incredible. Basically, basically she outlines how we as Americans have all been bamboozled by the Federal government, by England, by some very rich people, and powerful people, and people that are very greedy, that want to enslave all of us. And the Federal government deems us all as corporate entities, instead of God’s creation with inalienable rights and we have all been bamboozled into thinking that we live in the land of the free, but how free are we really when 60 or 70 percent of our money goes into taxes.”

“We’re told every morning what time to get up, what time to have lunch, what time to go home, how much sleep we need, so we can continue doing this day after day after day, to put into the system to make others rich and powerful. Well, Judge Anna Von Reitz does a very eloquent job of telling everyone what, what happened, how it’s still happening and how we can take our lives back all of us. These people are not very happy with that message because when the numbers, when the people, find out what has been going on for so long, they’re not going to be very happy. Well, we’ve been targeted pretty severely and so I’m just getting our message out saying once again, please pray for us. We’re probably going to go dark for the rest of the year- we will not be deterred, we will not quit….”

Besides indicating that he does not like to have to be told to be at work by a certain time, as I suppose he prefers to sleep in, I was curious by Jim Blake’s resentful claim of being taxed at the 60-70 percent level, since the Federal Income tax brackets peak out at about 39 percent. Even at that level, income is taxed in progressive steps, other types of taxes are deductible, etc., so it appears that Jim Blake is unable to give a credible analysis of the most basic realities affecting the middle and upper middle classes of the United States.

So how reliable are the opinions of the Blakes and the guests which they interview at Victurus Libertas? If you are looking for an honest and truthful discussion of the “evidence” upon which Angie and Jim Blake, Judge Anna Von Reitz, Robert David Steele, the Hagmanns or Sherry Peel Jackson rest their arguments on, you would be better off to do your own independent research.

Ironically, Anna Von Reitz accused the government, in the Victurus Libertas interview at the 5.14 mark, that “they’re doing a bunch of legalistic chicanery and semantic deceits in order to bring forward these false claims…”. This was stated by a woman who illegally claims to be an Alaskan Superior Court Judge, and who employs a bunch of legalistic chicanery and semantic deceits in order to support her false claims! And I did not take her words out of context.

CONtext! The whole CONtext! And nothing but the CONtext! Say, that would make a nice logo on a very large coffee mug or hoodie.

END NOTE: This article on Victurus Libertas was written in response to the following comment by Danny posted under the Tracking the Leopard Meroz January 7, 2018 article on Dave Daubenmire and Doug Hagmann.

After Carefully Considering the List of “My Mommy Told Me I Could Be Anything I Want To Be” Career Options ….. Glen Stoll Chose To Become A Sovereign Citizen Mastermind of Illegal Tax Schemes

Posted on November 10, 2017 by Jacquelyn Weaver

Glenn Stoll, tax advisor to Kent Hovind and other “ministries” bent on ruling the earth as Sovereign Citizens. Only those who are true prophets could have foreseen that many of his clients would be jailed for tax fraud.

In the previous post, I brought up the example of how Jesus Christ got to the heart of the motive of those who question legitimate authority, merely by posing one question that had two possible answers. His challengers tried to hide their true intentions by the evasive answer, We cannot tell. In this post, we are going to come down from the Kingdom of God higher court level to that earthly magistrate which has been granted the last word on this ball of dirt which we live. No, I am not talking about Death, or even Your Wife, but the Tax Judge.

Just as Jesus Christ, by a simple test, reveals the heart of the rebel against God, we discover that the highest tax court has also devised a test of willfulness to separate out the criminal tax violators from the rest of us, who are surrounded by a fog of confusion every April 15th.

Those who thoughtfully consider how to fairly apply tax laws are silenced by the reporting bias of the Christian Alternative Media

In 1992 Dwight W. Stone II, published in the Maryland Law Review, Volume 51, Issue 1, Article 8 a lengthy discussion titled, Cheek v. United States: Finally, a Precise Definition of the Willfulness Requirement in Federal Tax Crimes. The author, in his Introduction, says, “By reversing the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which had upheld the trial court’s use of the objective reasonableness standard, the Court finally laid to rest a persistently troublesome problem of statutory construction: how to interpret the word “willfully” in the context of the tax crimes statutes.”

Stone later remarks, “In United States v. Bishop, the Court attempted to define willfulness more precisely when it held that the ‘bad purpose’ or ‘evil motive’ of Murdock referred to ‘a voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty’,” adding that Congress’s intent in including the willfulness requirement was to “construct penalties that separate the purposeful tax violator from the well-meaning, but easily confused, mass of taxpayers.”

What that meant is that the Court was interested in separating out those who violate tax codes, by motive. Thus when on February 15, 2005 Glen Stoll was issued a “complaint for permanent injunction and other equitable relief” in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle, his motives were being tested, and this makes for interesting reading.

Speaking of motives, one of the questions which arose in my mind when reading the above legal complaint, has to do with that unified group of radio hosts in the Alternative Media who came out as Champions for Kent Hovind. By virtue of their public excusing of the criminal acts involved, it would seem that they became spiritual partakers in the sins of not only Kent Hovind, but of his tax advisor, Glen Stoll, as well.

So just how far down does the Christian Alternative Media’s roots sink into the soil of the Sovereign Citizen Movement? I suppose the answer has to do with how low did Glenn Stoll go, when he created fraudulent law and tax scheme businesses to profit off of that vast consumer base of Christian Imposters who think gain is godliness.

The Trap is set for the Christian who gives his passive consent to a clichéd view of the world, making them Partakers of Other Men’s Sins

Glen Stoll who never passed the lawyer’s bar exam in any state, thought at one point that by setting up the Arlington Law School that he could grant YOU a law degree for “passing” his courses. He successfully got Kent Hovind to pass another sort of Bars exam which got him a 10 year prison sentence for tax fraud.

“Ahhh, so what?” you say, as you declare your allegiance to your favorite Christian Alternative Media star, “how does this affect me?” The answer is “a lot” if their constant use of rhetorical devices over the years has remolded you from being a salt of the earth, hard-working, family loving, tax paying Christian into a cliché driven, non-critical thinking adversary of legitimate governmental authority. Consider one example of the rhetoric of Dave Hodges of the Commonsense Show, who wrote on January 22, 2013, Are You A Sovereign Citizen?

The very first sentence of Dave Hodges’ article is his thesis statement: Government never stop(sp) trying to find ways to cast legitimate dissenters in a negative light. From there, Hodges equates “Government” with the globalists, and he proceeds to go from general examples to the specific case of a woman named Stacy Lynne, who Hodges claims had her son taken from her in retaliation for her anti-Agenda 21 efforts, in connection with the “ICLEI invasion of Fort Collins, Colorado”. I am not going to discuss the features of this case, except to observe that Hodges uses this example as applying to a person who was labeled as being a Sovereign Citizen. Dave Hodges said he was confused by that designation until he read a police magazine and realized that the new domestic terrorist is the sovereign citizen.

In this article Hodges creates a stark contrast between the evil intentioned corporate-controlled media who had “brought attention to a secretive and dangerous subculture which believes American laws don’t apply to them” and that of the alternative, and truthful media representing the “legitimate dissenters”, which would include the author and his circle of radio host friends. Throughout this article Dave Hodges uses emotionally charged clichés to label broad groups of individuals, and pits them against each other. The effect is to lead his readers down the path of the non-thinker who never can grasp the complex reality of how things are actually done by those who are charged with enforcing the laws of our land.

Dave Hodges concludes, “One would be wise to avoid being labeled with the new domestic terrorist term, sovereign citizen. Carried out to its extreme, as in the case of Stacy Lynne, a sovereign citizen is not something that something that one wants to be labeled as the term is bootstrapping all legitimate concerns about the government and virtually criminalizing dissent and protest.”

I agree that it is not wise to be part of the Sovereign Citizen Movement. However, if you go back over Dave Hodges first sentence and look at the progression of his arguments which ignore the factual basis of the sovereign citizen movement’s criminal actions which government authorities have been faced with, and you understand that Dave Hodges views legitimate and lawful government agents as nothing more than globalists, his final statement is deceptive. Dave Hodges represents that double minded logical reasoning that one can hide your true motives, if only you are known by the right labels. Thus one who shows by his actions that he is a sovereign citizen in principle, is advised to not allow anyone to label them as such.

Rather than “freeing America one enslaved mind at a time”, Dave Hodges serves as a change agent for replacing legitimate and lawful governmental authority with a State of Confusion. If you call yourself a Christian, and you spout a bunch of religious lingo, yet your de facto views are those of a sovereign citizen who willfully misuses legal language, you are at heart an anarchist.

Going back to the Dwight Stone article I quoted in the beginning, those tax court judges who debated the test which would prove specific intent defined the required evil motive as being the “voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty.” And here is where someone like Glen Stoll condemns himself for he claimed to be an expert in the law and then later said he was not an expert, yet his actions betrayed him when he set up the Arlington Law School. Stoll revealed his knowledge of tax law by creating illegal tax exemption schemes which circumvented the law. He also has created problems for himself in misusing the name of Jesus Christ as the authority by which his schemes were based, and by pushing the false pretense that anyone can claim to have a tax exempt Christian ministry.

Hear No Evil gets a Driver’s License from the Embassy of Heaven and was rumored to be hiding out in a school bus on Glen Stoll property in Alabama

Speaking of the State of Confusion, I discovered a driver’s license for our friend, Hear No Evil, which appears to have originated from that sovereign citizen group called the Embassy of Heaven. Glen Stoll is affiliated with this group and had in the past had his clients make use of the EOH’s issuance of false legal documents, to supplement his corporation sole and ministerial trust agreements.

Sovereign Citizens create their own driver’s licenses

According to the Embassy of Heaven, who claims to represent God’s Government on Earth, in the Spring of 1993, the Secret Service conducted a “secret investigation of the Embassy of Heaven Church. Two men, posing as potential members, visited the Church, purchased some of our materials, and chatted with Paul Revere, the pastor.”

Paul Revere, did your mother really name you that? Of course not! Apparently he did not like the birth name which his parents gave him which was Craig Douglas Fleshman. But as a so-called Christian pastor who is to proclaim the truth, he thought it best to do so using a false name. How this computer systems analyst living in Oregon got into issuing false driver’s licenses and the like, I have no idea.

Paul Revere Rides Once Again with The Sovereign Citizens Making Their Last Stand

It is interesting that more corporation soles had been issued in Washington and Nevada than in any of the other states. Pastor Paul Revere’s Washington state business associate Glen Stoll, and his former friends John and Candice Sinclair, who were defendants in a similar tax fraud lawsuit, are the most likely causes of that statistical anomaly. As for Nevada, the Bundy’s and their friends who also enjoy pondering sovereign citizen legal concepts, had moved their standoff from their home base to reappear in early 2016 in the forests of Oregon. One of those involved in that fiasco was Pete Santilli, an Alternative News Radio host who in 2015 heeded the call to defend that tax fraud Kent Hovind, forcing me to add him to my growing list of the Champions of Kent Hovind.

In the 1993 letter sent to the U. S. Secret Service from Pastor Paul Revere, he had declared, “We are authorized by Jesus Christ to maintain a system of records for the Kingdom of Heaven. We issue driving and vehicle documents as evidence of our authorization to use the Kingdom of Heaven Highways. We do not grant the state or federal governments permission to arrest our citizens, issue citations, seize vehicles or confiscate documents. If any state or federal agency has a complaint against one of our citizens, they need to file a complaint with our office and we will investigate, and if necessary, set a hearing.”

This 7 acres was zoned for agricultural purposes, so when Glen Stoll’s group set down a shipping container, a school bus with several persons living in it, and started building several small structures without first getting a building permit…the county authorities started asking questions.

Uh huh….well, I believe I have tracked Hear No Evil through his fake driver’s license to Bay Minette, Alabama where it seems he was found sleeping in a shipping container or school bus on 7 acres which Glen Stoll had acquired. In an article by Craig Myers dated January 20, 2010, Judge ties controversial Baldwin County Landowners to Tax Evasion Scheme, it appears that the locals were somewhat startled to find that the person who failed to get a building permit for several small structures was none other than The Family Defense League of Edmonds, WA, the precursor of Glen Stoll’s Remedies At Law.

When contacted, Glen Stoll reassured the caller that the federal lawsuit wasn’t legitimate, and he hadn’t broken any laws. “There is not even the slightest hint of truth to any such accusation. I’ve never been convicted or formally accused of any such thing,” Stoll said in a telephone interview. There was never a hearing, a notice of hearing, no due process…An attorney stuck a piece of paper in front of a judge and got him to sign it. We do traditional church ministry–evangelism, worship, helping the poor and needy.”

Craig Myers, the author of this article explains this gap theory of Glen Stoll’s recollection of events by stating, “In June 2005, U. S. District Judge Ricardo S. Martinex issued a default judgment and permanent injunction, ordering Stoll to stop ‘any conduct that interferes with the administration and enforcement of the internal revenue laws’.” Glenn Stoll has finely honed the art of willful ignorance, that art of sophistry which Sovereign Citizens have mastered to the extent that even the best of Jewish Talmudic lawyers would be confounded.

Glenn Stoll is accused of being frozen in fear and hiding out, in order to avoid having to answer his clients who end up in jail.

On July 12, 2011, Paul John: Hansen published Glen Stoll Abandons Trust Responsibility, Kent Hovind, a June 29, 2011 open letter from Kent Hovend to Glen Stoll of Remedies At Law. As you may have observed, in the middle of Paul John Hansen’s name is a colon. This strange use of punctuation signifies, like a gang hand gesture, that certain concepts of the Sovereign Citizen Movement are in play. Like some sort of amulet of protection, Hansen also used the double parenthesis in this request, [[Send me your dealings (story) with Glen Stoll and I’ll expose his breach of contracts here.]]

In this open letter, Kent Hovind begins, “Dear Glen, It is with great sadness that I must write this letter. I have tried to call you and your secretary scores (hundreds?) of times but neither of you will answer the phone. Others who are concerned about our ministry have also tried to contact you and their letters, calls, emails and pleas go unanswered by you.”

“I cannot comprehend what you are thinking nor why you would behave this way. In 2002 our ministry was part of Faith Baptist fellowship under Pastor Richard Mooneyhan. He was retiring and the Church elected to dissolve. As founder of Creation Science Evangelism I was concerned with out ministry being “orphaned” and asked God to provide a “man of understanding” (Ezra 5-8) to show us how to be properly structured to please the Lord, be true to His Word and at the same time please the various government entities. The Bible commands us to, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.” Rom. 12:18.”

Kent Hovind explaining to Glen Stoll that the IRS has existed since Genesis 1:2 as “the darkness upon the face of the deep” which had become his prison experience

“Within a few days I met you and a few of your associates while I was preaching in the Northwest-Oregon I believe. We talked for several hours and I felt you had the perfect combination of knowledge of the law, knowledge of the church/state issues and a love for the Lord, I felt my prayer had been answered. Shortly thereafter you talked with Pastor Mooneyhan, created ministry trusts and the transfer was made. Since I have a very limited understanding of these issues I was free to continue my calling of traveling and preaching on creation and left the legal issues to you as trustee….Then, when the IRS attacked our ministry in 2006 and I was taken to prison something changed. When the Assistant US Attorney J. D. Roy Atchison seized the church ministry bank account and operating fund of over $x0,000 you did nothing! It was like you were frozen with fear.”

Kent Hovind then mentions that his CSE ministry had paid Glen Stoll a great deal of money over the years for his work on setting up trusts and for his advice. He wanted Stoll to resign as trustee of the ministry trusts and to have Stoll’s advisory board appoint Paul Hansen as trustee. Towards the end of this letter, Hovind starts to get tough, saying, “If you do not resign, send Paul the paperwork needed, and step out of the picture I will be forced to take several more steps which will be most unpleasant. I remain your friend, and Christian brother, and pray you will do right. Kent Hovind”.

How much does one pay for a tax evasion scheme which will cost you penalties and prison time later?

So, uhhh, like how much money did these poorly constructed legal traps of Glen Stoll cost? According to the late Karl Bremmer of the Minnesota based website, RippleInStillwater.com, the “ministry” of You Can Run, But You Cannot Hide was promised they could buy what Stoll said were ” ‘established, exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable and assignable ministerial trusts’ that would allow them to operate as a ‘free church’ that would be invulnerable to state regulation and control. For a fee of $6,500, they were told, Stoll would create three trusts that would give them ‘absolute tax-exempt status,’ eliminate all federal tax return filing requirements, allow donations to the organization to be tax-deductible, and allow the organizations to retain control and enjoyment of all assets of the ministries. They would also be assigned a trustee to deal with all federal, state and legal systems.”

It is interesting that Glen Stoll’s clients and also the Federal Courts keep bringing up this matter of the ministerial trusts and corporations sole which he had sold in an expensive package. Because in an October 15, 2005 Affidavit, the Affiant Glen Stoll acknowledges with his own signature that his 5 page document is ‘true, correct and certain, materially complete, relevant and not misleading”, and he states in point #3, “We at Remedies at Law do not ‘assist customers in creating ministerial trusts’ and we never have. All we do along those lines is to provide an establishment service for Church organization. We do not advise anyone to stop paying their taxes, or to stop filing tax returns as required, and we never have.”

If that was the case, what did these clients pay $6500 for? If it wasn’t for those ministerial trusts/ corporation sole documents, was it for a windowless shipping container in which they could hide out from the IRS?

Additionally according to Stoll’s Affidavit, under points #29 and #30, “As an ecclesiastical and commercial non-union lawyer, I have the experience and ability to provide assistance of Counsel in the areas of civil and religious liberties, maintaining professional integrity, and preserving personal privacy and protection. Although I have spent considerable time studying law during my professional legal career, beginning with family law in 1988, I do not practice or advise in any area of secular statutory law. Consequently, it would not be correct to assume that I am an expert in tax laws.”

Glenn Stoll did not pass the bar exam in any state of the United States of America, and he was never licensed to practice law; thus his Arlington Law School was about as bogus in their promise that one could “obtain a law degree for the professional application and practice of law” as the Patriot Baptist University was when they gave Kent Hovind a certificate granting him a PHD so he could parade around as Dr. Dino. One cannot keep up with the ever changing lies of these martyrs of the Sovereign Citizens movement who pose as Christians.

The Greater Frauds, which called themselves Greater Ministries International, just happen to have ties to the Embassy of Heaven affiliated with Glen Stoll

Another group which also had ties to the Embassy of Heaven (affiliated with Glen Stoll), was Greater Ministries International, out of Tampa, Florida which ran a Ponzi scheme which bilked 18,000 persons out of a half a billion dollars (only $500 million, if you view life as a cup only half full). GMI was prosecuted by the Justice Department. One of the best background reports on GMI is published by the ADL, or the Anti- Defamation League website. While there are several groups such as the ADL and Rightwing Watch that I differ with when it comes to political and religious ideology, some of their research and investigative journalism is top-notch and cannot be ignored.

When a Bible believing Christian has to rely on atheists and other watch groups for the truthful reporting of the facts of so called Christian fraudulent schemes, something is definitely amiss in the world of the Truthtellers of the Christian Alternative News Media. The Champions for Kent Hovind do not have clean hands; for example, Dave Daubenmire, Steve Quayle, Douglas Hagmann, Joe Hagmann, V-The Guerrilla Economist, Chuck Baldwin, Pete Santilli, Alex Jones, Sheila Zilinksky, and who knows else that I will soon stumble across.

For more information on Glen Stoll, see Robert Baty’s website kehvrlb.com to read Glen Stoll- Hovind, Hansen & Land Legal Scholar, NOT! Also Baty has preserved a transcript of Pete Santelli’s phone call to Judge Rodgers on behalf of Kent Hovind.

Robert Baty, Retired IRS Appeals Officer and Christian Seeks to Break The Code of Silence Protecting Kent Hovind’s False Legal Narratives

Posted on November 4, 2017 by Jacquelyn Weaver

The Code of Silence of Hear No Evil, See No Evil, and Speak No Evil. Feigning Ignorance, Kent Hovind and his supporters just can’t seem to figure out why the laws of this nation apply to them.

In discussing today’s subject, the first thing that I need to explain are those three primates to the left, representing The Code of Silence employed by liars to protect their sacred falsehoods from the light of truth. Also called the sin of willful ignorance, a Biblical illustration found in Mark 11:27-33 gets to the heart of this Oath. This oath has not evolved much from its creation, for these verses relate that the chief priests, scribes and the elders challenged Jesus by asking, “By what authority doest thou these things? And who gave thee this authority to do these things?”

In reply, Jesus said, “I will ask of you one question, and answer me, and I will tell you by what authority I do these things. The baptism of John, was it from heaven, or of men? Answer me.” So these men reasoned among themselves, and understood that either answer would place them in a position that they did not want to be in. Therefore they answered, “We cannot tell.” Perhaps they foresaw the day when Robert Baty would challenge a debate with the most effective apologist for Biblical creation in the world, Kent Hovind.

This we cannot tell answer is what is referred to as willful ignorance, and it has dire consequences in the soul of the person who engages in it. Heart motives are revealed in how we answer a question, and like the chief priests, elders and scribes, Kent Hovind and his supporters refuse to fully explain their position, which fits neither the facts or the law. The we cannot tell oath which undergirds The Code of Silence is the primary means of justification utilized by agnostics. Christians are to give an answer for the who, what, why, when, where and how of what they believe, and this answer should be spoken in clearly understood words. Agnostics, the “not knowers“, walk in deep darkness because at the heart of the matter is that they refuse to acknowledge real authority, as they consider real facts and evidence as some form of evil.

The feigned ignorance of Kent Hovind and his supporters is inexcusable because the foundation of his legal woes has been plainly laid out in court documents and commentaries over the years. While Christians are not to obey evil dictates, it should never be overlooked that the authority of government is God ordained, and therefore to be shown proper respect.

A Christian response to Kent Hovind

Let me give a couple of examples to bring these assertions to life. The first regards a Christian who sincerely considered the evidence of the Kent Hovind trial, and the implications of it. On January 21, 2007 rbell, a forum member of baptistboard.com quoted Kent Hovind’s plea for leniency to the court just prior to his sentencing, saying, “If it’s just money the IRS wants, there are thousands of people out there who will help pay the money they want so I can go back out there and preach”.

Rbell commented that he found Kent Hovind’s words disturbing…”let other folks–my supporters–pay my taxes“, and so he lays down 12 reasons why Hovind is a liar and disobedient to the Scriptures, as shown in this screenshot.

Honor Among the Tax Sophists: Rick Wiles and Kent Hovind bond together as two sides of the same counterfeit coin

My second example concerns the feigned ignorance shown eight years later on July 28, 2015, when Rick Wiles of TruNews said in a video interview of Kent Hovind, “Most of the Trunews audience knows the name Dr. Kent Hovind. He’s the most famous and respected advocate of creation science in our nation. He’s the founder of the Creation Science Evangelist Ministry at the Dinosaur Adventure Land in Florida. He traveled extensively for many years throughout the USA conducting creation science seminars and along the way he simply irritated too many people who despise God in the Bible and the corrupt regime that controls the federal government went after him in 2006. The IRS obtained federal convictions of him and Mrs. Hovind on three bogus charges, including structuring, meaning he withdrew cash from the bank in small increments which added up to ten thousand dollars. Did you know they can put you away for doing that? Well they did with Dr. Hovind and his wife. They also convicted him of tax evasion because his ministry’s associates were classified as ministers of the gospel, not employees who had payroll taxes withheld. You know the Soviet union silenced dissidents by committing them to mental institutions…”. (14.38-15.46).

Despite volumes of evidence which refute what Rick Wiles has stated above, he chooses to bear false witness against the IRS and the court system, stating that Kent Hovind’s tax problems arose because of his accusers’ hatred of the God of the Bible. When it comes to Kent Hovind and to Rick Wiles, they both adhere to the Code of Silence as they refuse to truthfully discuss each other’s tax propensities.

So what would be Rick Wiles’ motive in covering over the tax fraud of Kent Hovind? Well, one of Kent Hovind’s arguments was that the United States of America has no jurisdiction over him, and he based his reasoning on the arguments put forth by someone associated with the Sovereign Citizen Movement. Interestingly, this movement promotes a tax avoidance scheme that for years Rick Wiles has used involving the structuring of his ministry as a Corporation Sole.

I have written a couple of articles on Rick Wiles and his Office of Bishop of the Church of Trunews, and his Successor, a Corporation Sole, as well as his Office of the Senior Pastor and President of the Flowing Streams Church, and his Successors, a Corporation Sole. In 2016, a reader who I will not identify, who is personally acquainted with Rick Wiles, wrote “He calls himself a Bishop, but ordained/consecrated by whom? Flowing Streams Church has never conducted weekly services. Lately, his sidekick calls him Pastor Rick, but senior pastor of what? The Montana address they used on Last Chance Gulch is the Iron Face Hotel, and it is a hotel room. They rent efficiencies by the month.”

Unless Rick Wiles has recently altered the legal structuring of his ministry, the last I heard was that this self proclaimed Senior Pastor of the Flowing Streams Church, which has no services and no members, had received in 2015 donations totaling $5 million. All of this fake church set-up is contrary to tax law, so is it any wonder that Rick Wiles covers over the criminal convictions of Kent Hovind?

Pay No Attention to that tax fraud behind the curtain, the Radical Righteous Remnant of the Hagmann & Hagmann family Is Told to Walk on Water

Another example of The Monkey Code of Silence is found in this TheNewsUnit post with an audio clip from the Hagmann & Hagmann radio show of April 17, 2015. Note that last sentence, The result is a very profitable and lucrative ministry. And whoever put that sideways smiley face next to V-The Guerrilla Economist’s name had better go into hiding after that last article I did exposing that fraud V.

During this 2.40 minute audio clip from the Hagmann & Hagmann Report (50.45-52.49 mark) of April 17, 2015, we hear Gregg Jackson surmising, “…what if, Joe and Doug, if we look at the Kent Hovind situation, a guy who’s rotting in prison right now being persecuted unfairly, unjustly, essentially and we all know it’s not for tax evasion or any of those things. It’s because they want to shut up the most effective apologist for biblical creation in the world. That’s the real reason that they don’t want Kent Hovind out there, I believe.”

“So what if, I’m just using this as an example, what if the whole Hagmann and Hagmann family, not just those on Hagmann Connect, but what about if all of your listeners, and I know that your audience dwarfs MSNBC all combined that it’s bigger than most talk radio shows out there on most of the major networks, what if we came together as the Radical Righteous Remnant of the body of believers of the Hagmann & Hagmann family, what if you had, as Coach Dave was saying, even a small percentage of the Hagmann and Hagmann listeners calling in on behalf of Kent Hovind to the Judge or to whoever is hearing his case or to the local news media as those living locally in the area to go down to the courthouse where if I understand it correctly from Coach it was only about a handful of churches that came, our members of churches, but what if we and my point in this, we can have that type of impact but it’s up to us ultimately.”

“This is why what Coach Dave was saying is so important. It’s time to get in the game, which means we need to be uncomfortable and what do I mean by that that I mean we need to do the types of things that are uncomfortable for us. Do you think it was uncomfortable for Peter to take a step out of that boat when Jesus was, was walking on water? Peter got out of the boat, was walking, do you think that was uncomfortable? I mean it defies credulity, it defies the small human pea brains that we have that apart from faith and being obedient, it means walking on water, who can walk on water, I mean obviously it defies nature. I’m not going to be able to do that and yet Peter was able to do that and why was he able to do that because it was focused on the Lord Jesus Christ.”

OK, here we have Gregg Jackson calling on the millions of Hagmann listeners to take action, and he does not provide any details. Apparently he does not know the Judge’s name, or even who is presiding over the Kent Hovind case, or exactly what city it is in, or what the case is even about. But he wants everyone to phone this unnamed Judge and unnamed local newspaper, about what? “Hello Judge or What-ever-you-are, I’m in the game now, and we all know that your ruling has nothing to do with taxes, and millions of us have commandeered an armada of fishing boats just like at Dunkirk, and we are all going to walk across the Gulf of Mexico just like Peter did, by faith….(click)”.

Why Robert Baty IS Kent Hovind’s Worst Nightmare

When I first considered Kent Hovind in 2015, my primary sources of information were Peter J. Reilly who is a contributor on tax issues on forbes.com, and Dee Holmes who has a blog at Hovindology.com. I have always considered Kent Hovind’s worst nightmare to be himself and his supporters. But recently, as I began to consider the philosophy of the Sovereign Citizen Movement and how that tied in with various persons in the Christian Alternative News Media, I ran into the writings and interviews of Robert Baty who calls himself Kent Hovind’s Worst Nightmare.

Baty has a bit of a provocative sense of humor which he uses to gall the shameless Hovind into a debate with him. He recently posted a photo of himself standing in front of the gate of the Dinosaur Adventure Land property in Alabama. And Baty’s website kehvrlb.com posts this notice, THE CHALLENGE TO KENT HOVIND. There are now a total of 66 propositions for consideration.. Come out, Kent Hovind. Or, send me your Champion. We have things to discuss.. Sincerely, Robert Baty

What Kent Hovind fears the most is that Baty is very well spoken, a good writer displaying both humor and intelligence, who displays sound logic. Oh yeah, and he is a retired IRS Appeals Officer who is also a Christian, who easily rips the veil off of Hovind’s false legal narrative.

While Kent Hovind avoids the debate challenge of Robert Baty, those who argue with him soon retreat to the safety of the hen house.

Personally I would like to see Kent Hovind’s Champions come out one by one to debate Baty, starting with the Master of the Corporation Sole Rick Wiles, and then Get In The Game Dave (Coach) Daubenmire, The Godfather Douglas Hagmann, Goldslinger Steve Quayle, and I Can Walk on Water Gregg Jackson. Or if they are terrified that one day they might look out the window and see Robert Baty standing on the street outside of their sovereign domain, perhaps they could arrange to come out as a group representing the Radical Righteous Remnant of the Hagmann Family.

I know nothing of Robert Baty’s personal life, but I suspect his adversaries know a lot. I did notice that on October 10, 2017, Kent Hovind raised up on his video lead page, the banner Touch Not Mine Anointed as a warning to someone. Perhaps he has actually read the 66 debate propositions posted on Robert Baty’s website, titled Kent Hovind v. Robert Baty- The Great Debates! And now Hovind has been rendered speechless.

These 66 propositions are worded in the traditional debate style that requires the two debaters to begin their arguments by affirming or denying the opening statement. If that is too complicated of a process for Hovind, Baty has other sections on his website which relate to the core issues or persons connected with the Hovinds and their supporters.

One of the most dangerous aspects of Robert Baty, which is probably the number one reason why Kent Hovind will not debate, is the fact that Baty had steadfastly followed the details of the Hovind tax trials over the years and noticed things which the casual observer would not. For example, the August 13, 2013, Peter J. Reilley’s article, Doctor Dino- Kent Hovind May Lose in Court but will never give up, displays this comment from Robert Baty:I am going to take up the challenge of that last sentence, so the next post will be on, hmmm, there is so much to choose from, how about the tax advice of Glenn Stoll who can get you a longer jail sentence than you thought possible.

	zscore11 on D. George Sweigert vs. Jason G…
	SA on “Steve Quayle is Pumping…
	zscore11 on Jason Goodman vs. Adam Sharp,…
	zscore11 on ACH DU LIEBER Thomas Schoenber…
	Marie on Mike Whitestone and his GoFund…
	One of His on Mike Whitestone and his GoFund…
	Marie on Mike Whitestone and his GoFund…

Tracking The Leopard Meroz

a christian commentary on the curse of Judges 5:23, because they came not to the help of the LORD, against the mighty

Tag Archives: sovereign citizen movement