Douglas Hagmann and Judi McLeod of Canada Free Press: Still Sledding Downhill on Rosebud

Show the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that ye are gods: yea, do good, or do evil, that we may be dismayed, and behold it together.  Behold ye are of nothing, and your work of nought: an abomination is he that chooseth you.
Isaiah 41:23-24

A couple of days ago I was perusing the most recent shows done by the Hagmann Report, and noted that the July 13, 2016 broadcast, had been entitled DHS Insider Information Revisited On the Hagmann Report.  I listened to the first hour in which Doug brought up the name of Rosebud, the DHS Insider; a name which both he and Canada Free Press had heavily pushed to the forefront four years ago, during an election year. One scenario which had been promoted back then, was that Obama would institute martial law under a crisis,  thereby setting aside  American Presidential elections.

Rosebud, Yellow Journalism’s Insider Joke

Doug Hagmann in this most recent broadcast suggested that if the audience knew how the nickname Rosebud came about, we would all laugh.  Of course he does not give us this elementary back story, as we are not to be insiders to this little joke.  And so we fall back on our human capacity for word association, and most likely  we will be accused of having a wild imagination, should we dare to venture the wrong answer, but most especially, if we select the right interpretation of this image.rosebud (2)

So here we are in 2016, another election year with Obama serving his last term, awaiting the illusive choice of monied interests as to whether Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump will be the next  President of the United States of America.

So here is a real curiosity I discovered. On November 24, 2015 INFOWARS posted a 3.27 minute video of none other than Donald Trump in a piece called, Trump on Citizen Kane:  The Significance of Rosebud.   If you are down in the dumps about the upcoming election, view this video, and enter into the real twilight zone of the American ruling class, and experience relief that they do not sit as God on the  throne of mercy.

When I was in high school around 1967, my English class studied the making of classic movies, which included Citizen Kane, where the word Rosebud entered into the stream of consciousness of the American public. The main character is  based somewhat loosely on the Hearst newspaper empire, which was the father of yellow journalism and 24/7 news and entertainment reporting. The last word of the dying Kane in this movie was Rosebud, which was his childhood sled. This image represented the innocent happiness he once had known, which had been replaced by his ever increasing desire for fortune and power, a strong citadel which he constructed only to exclude that real happiness which can never be purchased for money. An interesting review of this movie can be found at the guardian.com in an April 25, 2015 piece by Peter Bradshaw titled, Citizen Kane and the meaning of Rosebud.

In a February 6, 2013 YouTube video we find a short mention of Rosebud, the DHS Insider given by Joel Skousen in an interview with Jeff Rense on December 26, 2012.    This is noted as “Joel gives his opinion of the DHS Insider “Rosebud” that feeds information to “alternative news” journalist Doug Hagmann”. Skousen’s opinion, by the way, is that Hagmann has presented the public with a fake insider. The comment section of this video displays the usual finger pointing accusations that Joel Skousen is the one who is a disinformation shill, whereas others in the Alternative Media are the real deal, and vice versa. This is Yellow Journalism at its best, shaping history and public opinion by dialectical reasoning.  Some of us still long for genuine leadership which relies on genuine evidence and those principles which are foundational to truth.

As Citizen Kane was based on the story of William Hearst, the father of Yellow Journalism, it is interesting to note that the keynote historical war which Hearst turned public opinion on, was also manipulated by another man, Joseph Pulitzer.  Together they became master builders of WAR, as children who construct with wooden blocks, – at that time, printer’s letter blocks.  Hearst and Pulitzer are both discussed in this spanamwar.com article on the Spanish American War Centennial’s page on the life of William Randolph Hearst.

Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis of WAR

Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis of WAR

The Complicity of Judi McLeod, Editor of Canada Free Press in promoting the DHS Insider

So here is what is interesting in the most recent promotion of Rosebud, the DHS Insider by Doug Hagmann.  In the July 13th, Hagmann Report video linked to above, Hagmann quotes from, and promotes the reading of an article dated July 13, 2016 written by Judi McLeod the editor of Canada Free Press called Obama will only impose martial law if it looks like Trump will win. Rosebud, Trump, Election Year, Martial Law?  One seldom considers the Canadian influence upon the American Alternative Media propagandists, but the partnership of Judi McLeod with Doug Hagmann in “discovering” and promoting the DHS Insider Rosebud, not to mention W The Intelligence Insider, should not be overlooked.

I recommend going to the Canada Free Press website, and entering Rosebud into their search box. This will bring up various past articles written primarily by Doug Hagmann publishing his DHS Insider’s opinions and warnings, most of which history proved were wrong. On December 28, 2013, the EU Times sought to reassure us that finally we were freed from Rosebud‘s hidden knowledge once and for all, when they reposted a Doug Hagmann article under the banner, DHS Insider gives final warning.

In addition to writing articles for Canada Free Press, as a Senior contributing writer, Douglas Hagmann used to make use of his old website which had the identical name, department of homeland security, as that of the DHS government agency.  But in fact, Hagmann had created his website before the creation of the government agency, in case you are wondering which came first, the chicken or the egg in this particular situation. Hagmann was also known under the North East Intelligence Network banner as well.    At KenWelch.com, there still remains an article written on September 11, 2006, called BUSTED: Doug Hagmann and Northeast Intelligence NetworkAnd of course forums which repost insider disinfo are always interesting if you want to document the trail of Doug Hagmann.  For example, in February 2013, ten months before the supposed finality of Rosebud’s revelations,  the forum Whenshtf.com published a thread called, DHS Insider Rosebud:  Back With Shocking New Revelations.

Alex Jones, King of the Snowy Mountain of Yellow Journalism

But why not give Alex Jones’ INFOWARS forum the last word?  After all, he did post that interesting video on Trump discussing Rosebud. And on June 20, 2013, the topic in his forum was Hagmann’s DHS Insider:  MARTIAL LAW IN TWO WEEKS (Updated). Do any of you remember when that happened? 

Rosebud and his promoters have reappeared once again this month, in regard to Trump, the upcoming election, race wars, and martial law.  It is always prudent to be prepared for any critical event, but after having the pantry stocked full and the guns loaded, why not sit back in your wicker rocking chair on the front porch, and just enjoy the warm summer evening.

Prophetic failures are a dime a dozen in the Alternative Media, so do not be surprised in this twilight zone if you see Doug Hagmann and Judi McLeod sledding downhill on Rosebud, whizzing through yet another story line, kicking up snow and blurring the lines between sanity and insanity once again. But take notice that the backdrop behind all these predictions  is the standing challenge of Isaiah 41:23-24, quoted in the heading of this post; a challenge made by the LORD God to those gods of predictive programming.

 

 

The Two Sided Oath of Revealing and Concealing Secrets

Then I turned, and lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and behold a flying roll.  And he said unto me, What seest thou? And I answered, I see a flying roll; the length thereof is twenty cubits, and the breadth thereof ten cubits.  Then said he unto me, This is the curse that goeth forth over the face of the whole earth:  for every one that stealeth shall be cut off as on this side according to it; and every one that sweareth shall be cut off as on that side according to it.  I will bring it forth, saith the LORD of hosts, and it shall enter into the house of the thief, and into the house of him that sweareth falsely by my name:  and it shall remain in the midst of his house, and shall consume it with the timber thereof and the stones thereof. Zechariah 5:1-4zechariah 5 flying scroll

When one enters into the employ of the U. S. government, various oaths are required, depending on the nature of the position held.  Underlying such employment are also laws designed to protect the integrity of the lawful records and documentation of  communications of government operations.  For example, the following screenshot is taken from the United States Code, Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, on Public Officers and Employees, Section 1924, on Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material. This code was used as a basis for investigating General Petraeus for mishandling classified documents.hillary clinton emails law (2)

(In the paragraphs below, I have added bold print to highlight certain points noted in the articles written by others, which I find interesting.)

On February 24, 2016, The Washington Post published an article by Michelle Lee He Lee, called Why the Clinton email scandal and Petraeus leak are not really alike, giving various facts which display the differences between the two cases.  This well written article remarks in its introduction, “Petraeus, a respected four-star general who many believed would run for President one day, resigned as CIA Director in 2012 amid a criminal investigation.  He faced potential felony charges and imprisonment, after the FBI discovered he had provided classified information to Broadwell, and lied to the FBI about it, enraging agents”.

Paula Broadwell was at that time, Petraeus’ mistress and biographer. An update to this article gives this added twist to the story, saying, “Broadwell had bad-mouthed socialite Jill Kelly in anonymous e-mails to military officials, which prompted the FBI’s investigation.”

Michelle Lee continues, “In his plea agreement, Petraeus admitted to mishandling classified information that was contained in personal notebooks. Petraeus told Broadwell that his notebooks contained “highly classified” information, yet gave them to her. The information didn’t appear in the biography. Petraeus lied to the FBI during the investigation..”.  In the end, The Justice Department accepted a plea agreement, and Michelle Lee notes that the statement of facts accompanying this agreement, had stated that “Petraeus’s actions, including lying to the FBI,  ‘were in all respects knowing and deliberate, and were not committed by mistake, accident or another innocent reason’.”

With regard to the Clinton emails, the Washington Post article notes that there was “a dispute over whether some of the information sent through Clinton’s private email server was classified when it was designed to handle unclassified communications….A federal judge in a public records case against the State Department over Clinton emails has ruled that State Department officials and top Clinton aides should be deposed about whether they knowingly thwarted federal open records laws through Clinton’s private email arrangement.  The emails were not  marked “classified” at the time they were sent.  But officials found “top secret” information in her emails because of a process called “retroactive classification”.  That means if there is a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for information sent on an unclassified system, the State Department can retroactively deem it classified instead of making it public.”

Finally, author Michelle Lee observes, “Clinton signed a Classified Information NonDisclosure Agreement, in which she pledged to safeguard classified information whether marked or unmarked classified.  But interestingly, Clinton also had authority under an executive order to classify or declassify information at the “top secret” level. (Petraeus had the same classification authority as CIA director.)”

Subsequent to the above observations made by the Washington Post, on July 6, 2016 ABC News published an internet article called Clinton Emails:  DOJ Will Not File Charges Against Former Secretary of State, written by Pierre Thomas and Margaret Chadbourn, saying, “The Justice Department will not file any charges against Hillary Clinton or anyone ‘within the scope of the investigation’ into her use of personal email while Secretary of State.  On Tuesday, FBI Director James Comey called Clinton ‘extremely careless” in her use of private email to conduct State Department business, but recommended to not file charges against Clinton.”

So here we have a rather curious system of authorizations involving the classification of information. Government employees may be required to sign a Classified Information Non Disclosure Agreement. But there are certain overriding authorities given, which may be granted by Executive Orders, which allow a government official to declassify top secret information to a lesser classification; or conversely, retroactively reclassify unclassified information to a higher designation in order to prevent making public information which had been requested by a FOIA request.

As Zechariah 5:1-4 observes, a flying roll is envisioned,  as a curse going over the face of the whole earth. For purposes of analogy, let us envision this scroll as being a two-sided written document which is flying through our beloved cyberspace. The LORD of hosts, declares that this curse shall enter into the house of the thief and into the house of him that sweareth falsely by my name.  Oaths of government are usually made in the name of God,  for reasons described in Hebrews 6:16, For men verily swear by the greater: and an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife. And while many do not believe in the LORD, or Jehovah as such, we must remember that this particular name in the form of the Tetragrammaton, is the foundation for the Sephiroth and the Tarot.  This would represent swearing falsely by my name, as revealed in the Old Testament. (This concept is briefly explained in my Introduction “In The Name of God” to my blog, Mouni Sadhu Unmasked which is a book review of Mouni Sadhu’s tarot book)

In our analogy, we find the house of him that sweareth falsely, whereby the definition of perjury is made of none effect.  This is done via a system which can (one) reclassify documents, not merely for the sake of correcting classification errors, but also to release top secret information to those who do not hold that level of permission, and (two) retroactively reclassify documents to prevent the public from reading what had been unclassified information prior to a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) request being filed.

As an aside on the subject of oaths, the Hebrew word “shaba” or seven is translated as “to adjure or take an oath”Therefore “to seven oneself” would be to make a declaration seven times, which emphasizes the importance of the oath. This matter of confirming a vow by an oath is seen in Hebrews 6:17-18a, Wherein God, willing more abundantly to shew unto the heirs of promise the immutability of his counsel, confirmed it by an oath:  that by two immutable things in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation…

God has ordained Government for purposes of the lawful use of power over a nation.  Psalm 50, which was written by Asaph, speaks of Zion as the perfection of beauty, but ends with a warning in verse 16, saying But unto the wicked God saith, What hast thou to do to declare my statutes, or that thou shouldest take my covenant in thy mouth?  Seeing thou hatest instruction, and castest my words behind me.  When thou sawest a thief, then thou consentedst with him, and hast been partaker with adulterers.  Thou givest thy mouth to evil, and thy tongue frameth deceit.

So here we also have the house of the thief, wherein specified government documents which are top secret are stolen and illegally given to someone without the proper clearance; and vice versa, documents which are permitted to be read by the public are stolen by reclassifying them as secret.  This presents an interesting scenario when considering the case of Hillary Clinton who set up a private email server which involved transferring government documents outside of secure authorized government mechanisms. The other scenario of interest involved the methods used to steal government documents which were later revealed  by WikiLeaks.

I have been casually going over some of the WikiLeak documents of Hillary Clinton’s emails, and finding some interesting curiosities. WikiLeaks, whose slogan is, We open governments, has been written up by Wikipedia, in case you need a quick review of their history.  Also recently they created an archive of Hillary Clinton’s Emails. On the opening page of this archive, WikiLeaks says, “On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hilary Clinton’s private email server while she was Secretary of State.  The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014.  7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton.  The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request.  The final PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016.”

So I  entered the word WikiLeaks into the search box of the WikiLeaks archive of Hillary Clinton’s emailsWithin some of these emails, whether revealing or concealing secrets, is that curse going throughout all the earth of the two sides of a flying roll; one side representing the house of the thief, and the other side, the house of the false swearer.   Proverbs 29:24 declares, Whoso is partner with a thief hateth his own soul:  he heareth cursing, and bewrayeth it not.  The Hebrew word for cursing in this verse holds a peculiar irony, for the Strong’s Concordance word #423 is spelled alah. Now there is something to ponder.

I am linking two emails involving WikiLeaks.  The first is the Hillary Clinton email denoted #1054 which discusses The Right Response to WikiLeaks, dated November 30, 2010, stating,  “Many of the State Department documents released so far by WikiLeaks are embarrassing to their authors or subjects, but otherwise harmless.  Some might even be helpful:  ….. Still, there is little doubt that the release of the cables will damage the State Department and its diplomacy.  Sensitive reactions with countries such as Yemen, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia might be impaired; foreign leaders everywhere may consider carefully, at least for awhile, before speaking frankly to U. S. diplomats.”

“Some in Washington are calling on the Obama administration to respond to the leak with drastic measures, such as a cyberattack on the WikiLeaks Internet site or the prosecution of its Australian-born leader, Julian Assange.  That would be an overreaction.  There is apparently no top-secret material in the WikiLeaks documents;  the U. S. cyberwar capacity should not be deployed for less-than-critical interests.  Mr. Assangels(sp) arrest and prosecution would turn a man now widely perceived as a self-promoting sex crimes suspect into an international martyr.”

“There is a much more immediate and sensible task for Congress and the administration – starting with the Defense Department.  That is to thoroughly plumb how a 22-year-old Army private at a remote Iraqi base could have gotten access to 250,000 State Department cables, as well as tens of thousands more military reports from Iraq and Afghanistan, and how he could have downloaded them onto CDs without being detected.  The chief suspect in the deliveries to WikiLeaks, Bradley Manning, was a disconsolate man who had been reprimanded for assaulting an officer and believed he might be discharged for his misconduct.  Why was he allowed to retain access to classified information?  How could he have stolen such a large amount of material without triggering any alarms?

In response to the questions posed above in Hillary Clinton Email # 1054, may I suggest that an insider with a private email server could be positioned to be a middle man in such revealing and concealing of secrets?  I am not saying that Hillary Clinton was the middle person, but certainly she displays a method by which this scenario might play out.

In another email, shown here, https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/7226, dated November 28, 2010, Bloomberg is quoted:  “The Pentagon said yesterday it will take action to prevent future reoccurrences, such as monitoring user behavior in a way similar to steps taken by credit-card companies to detect fraud.  The military will also conduct security oversight inspections at forward bases and remove the ability of classified computers to download information onto removable disks.”

Quoting Politico in this email, we read, “The Pentagon on Sunday announced new approaches for how it would safeguard information in the wake of the leak of documents from Wiki-Leaks, amid allegations that the Obama administration went too far in improving information-sharing across the government.

Further down in this email, we read, “Associated Press:  The online website WikiLeaks on Sunday blamed the temporary outage of its site on a denial-of-service attack by unknown hackers trying to prevent its release of hundreds of thousands of classified U. S. State Department documents…James Lewis, a cyber security expert and a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said it’s unlikely the U. S. or some other government would use denial-of-service attacks against WikiLeaks.”

Perhaps some of you might want to search out some of Hillary Clinton’s emails out of curiosity. Who knows what has been revealed and concealed in these flying scrolls through cyberspace.

Proverbs 5:6 declares one of several warnings against the Strange Woman,  Lest thou should ponder the path of life, her ways are moveable, that thou canst not know them.

 

 

 

Maxed Out

And there was also a strife among themselves, which of them should be accounted the greatest.  Luke 22:24

It is getting so hot and sultry here in southern Mississippi, that I thought I would have a change of pace and go on an intergalactic trip to discover who should be accounted the greatest in the Alternative Media Universe.  If you care to tag along, I discovered that the easiest way to start such a trip is to go over to Stan Deyo’s Millennium Ark website and peruse through the archives of his radio interviews, which reflect a wide variety of alternative radio hosts.

So I asked,  Mirror, mirror, on the Alternative Wall, who do you reckon is the greatest of all?  Within a fraction of a second,  a voice smoother than butter, sounding oddly like Max Casey, answered back, THE INTERGALACTIC KNOW IT ALL & HOST OF THE BLACK MARKET LIBERTY SHOW. 

Ohhhkay, I think we have located our Leviathan of the Alternative Universe, the man who as Job 41:25,33-34 describes, When he raiseth up himself, the mighty are afraid:  by reason of breakings they purify themselves…Upon earth there is not his like, who is made without fear.  He beholdeth all high things:  he is a king over all children of pride.

max casey about (2)I have added bold print to highlight some of the following words of Max Casey, which I will be discussing in this post. He says, “I am the Intergalactic Know-It-all.  I stand 6’5” and weigh in at twice the average man.  I’m a former competitive fighter and a member of Mensa, which means I can beat you in a battle of wits or a battle of skill, and that gives me the balls to say it how I see it, without fear of hurting anyone’s feelings.  I believe men should behave like men and women should behave like women plain and simple.  As Aristotle put it, A is A, it can neither be A and B at the same time.  I’m an Objectivist, I believe that nature, if to be commanded, must be obeyed, and that “Man-every man-is an end in himself, not a means to the ends of others; he must work for rational self-interest, with the achievement of his own happiness as the highest moral purpose of his life” as Ayn Rand put it….free from the bondage of altruism, and the lie that one who is successful in life, owes a debt to the unsuccessful.  Damn the Man, and fight the power!

MAX CASEY CLAIMS “I CAN BEAT YOU IN A BATTLE OF WITS OR A BATTLE OF SKILL”.

Max Casey claimed on May 7, 2015 that “I am the pedophile mohammed“.  Here is the screenshot of that assertion:

Facebook of Max Casey, one of his profiles as the pedophile Mohammed

Facebook of Max Casey AKA Maximum Casey profiling himself as the pedophile Mohammed

Mensa apparently has its limitations in identifying the geniuses of this world. Does Max Casey have any clue what the implications of this statement are? Well perhaps Aristotle, whom Casey quotes in regard to the differentiation between men and women, can shed some light.  Let’s see, A is A is insightful when applied to the sentence  Max Casey is The Pedophile Mohammed. I know that this one declaration of truth has certainly caused me to muse about the day when the Great I AM of that statement receives a knock on the door from ISIS, inquiring after his identity.    But I suspect  we will hear Maximum pleading with the Islamic terrorists on his door step, begging their understanding of the peculiar situation he is in, saying, “Guys, I was just kidding, really….both you and I know that A is not really A, uhhh er, I was just trying to be A and B at the same time! Don’t you fellows know a joke when you hear one?”

But as Job 9:20 so rudely points out, “If I justify myself, mine own mouth shall condemn me:  if I say, I am perfect, it shall prove me perverse.”

Now who wants to be the first one to notify the true followers of Mohammed that Max Casey, being a former competitive fighter and a member of Mensa, is actually the pedophile Mohammed boasting “I can beat you in a battle of wits or a battle of skill”? Where are those Terrorist Watchlisters when you need one?

Max Casey, is the man of Psalm 55:21:  The words of his mouth were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart:  his words were softer than oil, yet were they drawn swords. If you read the articles on his webpage, there is definitely an oily feel to his words, as he exalts the pinnacle of self centeredness, where men who are real men behave as pedophilic false prophets, who in their noblest moments enjoy destroying the precious bonds of love, natural affection, and generosity.

MAX CASEY IS “FREE FROM THE BONDAGE OF ALTRUISM, AND THE LIE THAT ONE WHO IS SUCCESSFUL IN LIFE, OWES A DEBT TO THE UNSUCCESSFUL”.

There is a partial Biblical truth hidden in this, in that the person who works does not owe anything to the one who refuses to work.  Underlying this scriptural admonition is the assumption that both persons had the ability to work;  rather than that one party was in dire need of charity due to external hardships, which prevented the person from working for his own bread.

Max Casey completely obscures the principle of the God given right to the fruit of one’s efforts, as well as those principles of a God defined charity which rationally determines what kind of assistance should be given to those in genuine need. It is the philosophy of the Devil to regard only self interest, and never the interests of others.  He quotes this statement as if the blessings of heaven, rather than hell sit upon these words:   “Man – every man- is an end in himself, not a means to the ends of others; he must live for his own sake, neither sacrificing  himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself; he must work for his rational self-interest, with the achievement of his own happiness as the highest moral purpose of his life, as Ayn Rand put it.”

The dictionary definition of altruism is the “unselfish regard for or devotion to the welfare of others”.  So Max Casey is challenging God himself when he disdains the serving of others as being a form of bondage, rather than as a trait of the greatest among men. It is a significant trait of Jesus Christ and the basis for his sacrifice as the Lamb of God which takes away the sins of men.  Luke 22:25-27 records the viewpoint of Jesus in this matter:  And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that experience authority upon them are called benefactors.  But ye shall not be so; but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve.  For whether is greater, he that sitteth at meat, or he that serveth?  Is not he that sitteth at meat?  but I am among you as he that serveth.

Casey draws an artificial line, without defining his values in detail, between persons he deems successful as opposed to those who are unsuccessful.  In common parlance,  Money and outward achievement are the means of measuring the success of men. However, the Bible again turns the tables on these labels in Psalm 52:7, saying, Lo, this is the man that made not God his strength:  but trusted in the abundance of his riches, and strengthened himself in his wickedness.

Black Market Liberty.com was created April 28, 2009 and registered by Jason Deitering of the organization, Drunken Moose LLC. But it is Max Casey who in the subtitle of his website says that he is the “host of the Black Market Liberty Show”.  So as a token of his profane point of view, I am offering the following screenshot of words posted on this site.  As a rule, I do not publish vile speech on my own blog; however, in this case, I make an exception in order to display the outward evidence which confirms what stories I have heard behind the scenes. So with many apologies, here is the screenshot:

Profane and vulgar speech exhibtion

Profane and vulgar speech exhibit

Persons who do not believe that the God of the Scriptures created them, proudly consider themselves exempt from the words of God.  However, no man is exempt from Truth, whether it be found in the laws of nature or the laws of a holy God.  The LORD warned Israel what would happen after they were delivered and brought into the promised land, and started to think that their prosperity was by their own hand.

Deuteronomy 8:12-18 declares: Lest when thou hast eaten and art full, and hast built goodly houses, and dwelt therein; and when thy herds and thy flocks multiply, and thy silver and thy gold is multiplied, and all that thou hast is multiplied; then thine heart be lifted up and thou forget the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage;  who led thee through that great and terrible wilderness, wherein were fiery serpents, and scorpions, and drought, where there was no water; who brought thee forth water out of the rock of flint; who fed thee in the wilderness with manna, which thy fathers knew not, that he might humble thee, to do thee good at thy latter end;  And thou say in thine heart, My power and the might of mine hand hath gotten me this wealth.  But thou shalt remember the LORD thy God: for it is he that giveth thee power to get wealth, that he may establish his covenant which he sware unto thy fathers, as it is this day.

The above words were spoken to a nation established by the LORD; is a nation that proclaims to uphold the freedom of religion, allowing the worship of strange gods, exempt from the obligation to worship the true Creator, the Holy God who is preeminent, above all dominions and principalities and who sent his only begotten Son for our salvation?

Romans 1:18-23a,24a,25 says that For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shown it unto them.  For the invisible things from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.  Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man…wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness…who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

Instead of mocking God by boasting on Facebook that you are the pedophile Mohammed, perhaps Max Casey, you should acknowledge that it was God who gave you your intelligence and abilities and opportunities which have allowed you to prosper. You are deluded if you think that an old hacker like yourself has superior  battle skills. Who was it that Jesus was referring to when he concluded, So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God? Have you no fear of God saying to you, Thou fool; this night thy soul shall be required of thee? (Luke 12:20-21)

Hebrews 12:14-17 advises, Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord: looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled;  lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.  For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.

Obadiah 1:3-4 which is addressed to Edom in connection with Esau, says,The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high; that saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground?  Though thou exalt thyself as the eagle, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith the LORD.

MAX CASEY’S BATTLE CRY IS “DAMN THE MAN, AND FIGHT THE POWER!”

I had to ask a friend what does “Damn the Man, and fight the power!” mean?  He answered, “What he means is he is an anarchist.  Damn the Man is the police and government, and Fight the Power is the power they hold over us”.  This is truly a peculiar battle cry from someone who has earned his living by being employed by the government, and while supposedly extols freedom and liberty, at the same time mocks our very freedoms and liberty by proclaiming ” I am pedophile Mohammed.”

Black Market Liberty shows this image as their banner:

Burning of the American Flag, symbol of freedom and liberty

Burning of the American Flag, symbol of freedom and liberty

Government is a very deep subject in the Scriptures and because it involves the holding of power at a national level, it has become a subject easily corrupted by those who covet the seats of final authority.  Romans 13:1-4 is commonly misused for wrong purposes,  but I am going to quote it anyways:  Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers, for there is no power but of God; the powers that be are ordained of God.  Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God:  and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.  For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil.  Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power?  do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same.  For he is the minister of God to thee for good.  But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain:  for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.

Another commonly quoted Scripture verse to keep people in their place under a corrupt leader is, Exodus 22:28, Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people.  When one broaches the subject of Government, one has entered into very deep waters, and the shallow platitudes of the Alternative Media fail to plumb the depths. Certainly, a man like Max Casey who ought to have great insight into government, fails in this regard.

In conclusion I want to address some differences between Allah and Jesus Christ.  As Max Casey has proclaimed “I am pedophile Mohammed” and A is A, after all, and Mohammed is the prophet of Allah; remember that it was Mohammed who said, “If you believe Allah had a son, you are an infidel and should be killed”. (Sura 2:116, 72:3,9:29-20, 5:17, 37:152, 23:89, 10:68-70). (quoted from Dr. Ruckman’s book noted below)

So why does anyone as well known in the Christian Alternative Media as is Stan Deyo, consent to being interviewed by the profane host of Black Market Liberty?

I am going to quote some things about Mohammed and Allah, from Dr. Peter S. Ruckman’s 116 page book entitled, Will The Real “Allah” “the god” Stand Up? which is a compilation of articles originally printed in the Bible Believers’ Bulletin. Dr. Ruckman was once an Army man, and came from a line of career Army men. After he became saved by faith in Jesus Christ, he entered into the ministry of evangelism, teaching, and pastoral preaching.  Having a genius IQ as a result of extensive reading and studying a wide range of books and subjects, I do not think that Max Casey could  have stood for one minute before the combat and intellectual skills of the late Dr. Ruckman, who passed away this April.

On pages 25-26, Ruckman says, “This brings us back to the major theme of our work:  total confusion.  How come the Moslems; “the God” can’t tell you his name?  You say, “His name is ‘the God’.” (The word Allah means ‘the God.’)  Excellent, now what’s his name? “Well, he’s the merciful, the magnificent, the wonderful….”.    No, I didn’t ask you for attributes or titles; I want his name.  What is his NAME?”

“Watch it carefully, stupid; let’s go back to the third grade again.  Jesus Christ is called “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6), “the door” (John 10:9), “the good shepherd” (John 10:11), “the bread of life” (John 6:35), “the light of the world” (John 8:12), the “Alpha and Omega” (Rev. 1:8), and “the beginning and the ending” (Rev.1:8),  but those are not names;  those are titles.  His name was JESUS…..Well let’s take the Moslem’s god. “What’s your name?”  “The god.” (That’s what “Allah” means- “the God.”)  “You are ‘the god’?”  “Yeah, No other one.”  “Good, what’s your name?”  Not a squeak; not a sound.”

“Paul said to a bunch of Greek dumb-bunny philosophers: “You worship an unknown god.”  When he declared “THE UNKNOWN GOD” (Acts 17:23); they didn’t know his name.  Do you know what he declared? Well, Paul didn’t open his mouth about any God called “Allah”….”.

On page 34, Ruckman comments, “In the New Testament, when Jehovah (“I AM“), the eternal God, shows up on earth as a man, he says, “Now my name will be ‘Jehovah saves.’  I’m here as a human being to save you.  So my name is ‘Jesus.’ ”  But when Mohammed’s Allah showed up -oops! He never showed up!  Well, when he spoke -oops! He never spoke.  Gabriel gave the whole Koran to Mohammed; Allah didn’t give him a word of it. Well, sir, when Allah (even though he didn’t speak and couldn’t “show up”) finally revealed his “name,” he claimed that his name was “the God”, which is no one’s “name” unless it’s “the god of this world” (2 Cor. 4:4).”

The god of this world (2 Cor. 4:4) is not an Arabian god.  “The god of this world (2 Cor. 4:4) is the god of all seven continents, and he has a name…Satan“.

On pages 62-63 of Ruckman’s discourse, we read, “Want to see a stealing killer in action? Mohammed said that booty was made lawful for him but not for those before him.  That is, no prophet could steal people’s wives and their children, after killing them and taking their land, until he showed up.  My, what a righteous standard for judgment!  Finally, he gave himself the right of intercession for sinners on the day of resurrection. As we said before, who but a blanket-blank idiot would go to a demoniac thief for intercession in the “day of resurrection”?” …A fellow so stuck on himself that he went around saying, “if you obey me you obey God” (Sura 4:80).”

Romans 1:28-32 concludes, And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, without understanding, covenant breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:  Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

So, is it a small matter for a man to boast, “I am pedophile Mohammed”?; and to declare that “the achievement of his happiness (is) the highest moral purpose of his life?” Max Casey boasts “I’m a former competitive fighter and a member of Mensa, which means I can beat you in a battle of wits or a battle of skill”.

Proverbs 27:1 warns, Boast not thyself of tomorrow; for thou knowest not what a day may bring forth.

Update:   July 7,2016   I removed the Linked In image which I had originally posted, and intend to replace it with another photo, along with the factual background on the real person behind this nom de plume.

Vector Analysis of “A Certain Man Drew a Bow at a Venture”

TEKEL:  Thou art weighed in the balances and art found wanting. Daniel 5:27
And the battle increased that day:  and the king was stayed up in his chariot against the Syrians, and died at even:  and the blood ran out of the wound into the midst of the chariot.  I Kings 22:35

When I was a teenager and first introduced to the mathematics of physics, I was astonished that mathematics could represent and calculate the flight of an arrow.  Indeed, vector analysis uses the image of the arrow to represent magnitude and direction.  Many of the arrows in the Old Testament have their source in the LORD, as deliverance, as chastisement, as a return blow on wicked archers, who employ bitter words.  When I was studying Mouni Sadhu’s teachings on the Tarot, it was notable that each card had an aspect that was represented by a different form of an arrow, all based on a false theory of the Tetragrammaton.

And so today I am going to ponder an interesting phenomenon spoken of in I Kings 22:34 which is contained in the phrase I have highlighted with bold lettering:  And a certain man drew a bow at a venture, and smote the king of Israel between the joints of the harness:  wherefore he said unto the driver of his chariot, Turn thine hand, and carry me out of the host; for I am wounded.  One of the common synonyms for venture is “to expose to hazard, fate, or destiny”, and so the archer in this verse of scripture drew his bow, without aiming for a particular target, and let go of the arrow.  How it went from his quiver to his bow and released to sail through the air, to fulfil the prophesy of Ahab’s fall at Ramoth-gilead,  makes for an interesting vector analysis, so to speak.

Back in 2001, I observed how an arrow forged from words had hit its target, creating a deep spiritual wound which took some five months to recover from.  Later, when I started studying the gematria of the Scriptures, I  remembered the words which were the bow which sent that particular arrow in a direct hit.  The words which had been used as a weapon were  Wounded in Battle, and the scripture quoted had been I Kings 22:35. The interesting thing I noted about the Hebrew gematria of this verse is that it equals 3003, which is also equivalent to the Hebrew gematria of Daniel 5:27.  Both scriptures are quoted at the top of this post.

The word venture in its archaic sense means “trusting to chance”.  Balaam, who I consider to be the model of the leopard Meroz, displayed a loose regard for quoting the words given him by God, while at the same time proclaiming his faithful application of the words of God.  As a prophet with a lying spirit, Balaam became as a “certain man who drew a bow at a venture”, speaking some of the most important prophecies in the Old Testament of Israel.  And so we read one of his lies spoken in Numbers 24: 12-13, which came back to haunt him:  And Balaam said unto Balak, Spake I not also to thy messengers which thou sentest unto me, saying, If Balak would give me his house full of silver and gold, I cannot go beyond the commandment of the LORD, to do either good or bad of mine own mind; but what the LORD saith, that will I speak?

In all of this we need to recall the warning of James 3:8-10, But the tongue can no man tame, it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.  Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God.  Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing.  My brethren, these things ought not so to be. How important are our words and the source of the fountain from which those words spring?

The answer is that words are very important, for we read in Luke 20:19 after Jesus spoke of the stone which the builders had rejected,  the chief priests and the scribes the same hour sought to lay hands on him; and they feared the people: for they perceived that he had spoken this parable against them.  And they watched him, and sent forth spies, which should feign themselves just men, that they might take hold of his words, that so they might deliver him unto the power and authority of the governor.

There are various methods of overturning the words of God, while appearing to have noble motives. The laying in the Balances of Judgment, false weights constructed by the deceitful use of gematria, which substitute one scripture verse with another, is a critical method of warfare through the use of guile.  The source of such a technique is Satan himself, and it is the servants of Satan in the hidden realm of this world which release such arrows as noted in Psalm 64:3-4, Who whet their tongue like a sword, and bend their bows to shoot their arrows, even bitter words:  that they may shoot in secret at the perfect:  suddenly do they shoot at him, and fear not.

The story we are considering today however involves similar principles and begins with a visit of Jehoshaphat, the king of Judah,  to Ahab, the king of Israel. I Kings 22:4 tells us that Ahab asked Jehoshaphat if he will help him take Ramoth in Gilead out of the hand of the king of Syria.  Jehoshaphat agrees and asks Ahab to inquire at the word of the LORD, but Ahab instead gathers 400 false prophets who all agreed that it was the will of the LORD to go up to battle. Jehoshaphat, whose name combines Jehovah with Judged, asks, Is there not here a prophet of the LORD besides, that we might inquire of him?  There was one true prophet nearby, Micaiah; but he is in prison because Ahab hates him for prophesying evil against the king.

When Micaiah is brought forth and states the same prophesy as the false prophets, Ahab becomes irritated by the sarcasm of Micaiah. After that the true prophet speaks the truth forthrightly.  It is interesting that King Ahab does know that his false prophets have spoken falsely; yet he cannot seem to bring himself to hear the truth spoken, so when Micaiah speaks the true word from the LORD, and it does not agree with Ahab’s desires, he is further irritated.

Then Micaiah says (verse 19-23), Hear thou therefore the word of the LORD: I saw the LORD sitting on his throne, and all the host of heaven standing by him on his right hand and on his left.  And the LORD said, Who shall persuade Ahab, that he may go up and fall at Ramoth-gilead?  And one said on this manner, and another said on that manner.  And there came forth a spirit, and stood before the LORD, and said, I will persuade him.  And the LORD said unto him, Wherewith?  And he said, I will go forth, and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets.  And he said, Thou shalt persuade him, and prevail also: go forth, and do so. Now therefore, behold, the LORD hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these thy prophets, and the LORD hath spoken evil concerning thee.

So here we have an interesting scenario of a lying spirit doing the will of God. And as Daniel 5:27 represented something weighed in the balances as part of a prophesy of the imminent fall of Babylon, we also see a weighing in the balances in I Kings 22,  which resulted in the imminent fall of  King Ahab.

We are going to step back from this scene for a moment and consider the philosophy of  Kyudo: the Way of the Arrow as related by Jeri Massi, a Christian woman who also is a martial arts master.  Her words are excerpted from her book, Letters to Lynn Redgrave:  Martial Enlightenment for Modern Women (and Men), published in 2014.  We have just been considering how the LORD can commission lying spirits to bring about His will, in the case of a historical battle and the death of an evil king. So why not also take a short look at the battle philosophies developed by godless men, for there may be a golden nugget of truth in what they propose.

Jerri Massi, beginning on page 119, is giving advice based on The Fire Book -Hi no Maki, written by Musashi.  She begins, “In Zen, the outward elements of weapon (any weapon), strategy, setting, and the self are blended.  We Westerners wall out objective reality from our selves, making the thinker one entity and the object that he observes entirely separate.  To the Japanese philosophers, the walls between self and the perceived object are a lot thinner, and there are many joining places.”

She continues, “To explain the ‘meaning of life and death’ in terms of fight theory, I need to explain Japanese archery (kyudo) to you,  In kyudo, the bow is nearly as tall as a Japanese man, and the first several months of learning this art are spent learning to string the bow.  Then the next year is spent learning to draw the bow correctly, using breath and harmony of motion rather than raw strength.  Finally the student learns to shoot the arrow.”

“But to consciously release the arrow is forbidden.  The arrow must release itself or the shot goes astray.  And so, for the next year, the student archer learns *not* to release the arrow as he holds the drawn bow.  He waits until self and arrow and breath are united, and then the arrow freely flies.…Aiming is never taught in the conventional sense. When the student has learned to consistently unite breath and self to arrow and bow, he begins shooting down the length of the long archery hall.  There is no siting down the arm or arrow, no squinting, no tilting the head over.”

“Yet the masters unfailingly hit the black area of the target again and again… Eugen Herrigel, the first Westerner to become a Master of kyudo…would later demonstrate this same feat of skill in his native Germany.  The archer, he explained, actually aims at himself.  He is not shooting a separate entity called a target. Rather, the target (like the bow and the arrow) is an extension of himself on which he focuses his mind….What unites the archer to the target?  Obviously the arrow does.  He is the bow, and he is the arrow, and he is the target”.

After pondering this Oriental perspective, we return back to see how King Ahab became the bow, the arrow and the target, resulting in his death. We recall that Ahab had called in 400 false prophets, but Jehoshaphat desired the word of a true prophet, and Micaiah was brought forth to speak the word of God to Ahab.  Ezekiel 14:1 tells of certain elders who made enquiry of the prophet Ezekiel but the LORD answered in verse 4, Therefore speak unto them, and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Every man of the house of Israel that setteth up his idols in his heart, and putteth the stumblingblock of his iniquity before his face, and cometh to the prophet; I the LORD will answer him that cometh according to the multitude of his idols;  that I may take the house of Israel in their own heart, because the are all estranged from me through their idols.

The LORD commissioned a lying spirit to persuade Ahab to go up and fall at Ramoth-gilead.  To circumvent this, Ahab went into battle in disguise; whereas he instructed Jehoshaphat to wear his robes, making him identifiable as the only king at the scene of the battle.  The king of Syria had commanded his 32 captains to ignore the small and the great and to target the king of Israel, exclusively.  Thus Jehoshaphat almost lost his life, when the Syrians pursued him, thinking that he was in fact Ahab.  When he cried out, his life was spared.  It was after that, that a certain man drew a bow at a venture, smiting the king of Israel between the joints of the harness, wounding him so that his blood flowed out in the midst of his chariot.

Thus was fulfilled the spiritual principle laid out in Ezekiel 14, and signified in verse 8 which says, And I will set my face against that man, and will make him a sign and a proverb, and I will cut him off from the midst of my people: and ye shall know that I am the LORD.

Thus in our Vector Analysis of “a certain man drew a bow at a venture”, the great balances of the judgments of the Order of the Leopard have been examined, according to the principles laid out in the Scriptures.

The fatal flaw of Ahab, king of Israel was that he knew his 400 prophets prophesied falsely in order to tell him what he wanted to hear. And he knew that the true prophet Micaiah, in speaking evil against him, spoke the word of the LORD truly.

TEKEL:  thou art weighed in the balances and art found wanting was forged into an arrow with the magnitude and direction of an executioner of death, and the king thus wounded, died at evening.