Sovereign Citizen Mike Parsons Demonstrates How Not To Make A Citizen Arrest

The previous Tracking the Leopard Meroz article ended with the YouTube channel Virgo Triad having an international arrest warrant issued against her for attempted murder for the crime of identifying as a “sovereign citizen”,  sovereign citizen John Harold Fulks, the self-appointed Governor of the United States of America. After the FBI decided to consider Fulk’s illegal arrest warrant as a call for a hit against the life of Virgo Triad, Fulks published a June 19, 2018 notice at reign of the heavens.com declaring that the Virgo Triad case had been transferred to their Human Rights Tribunal (HRT), thus  suspending the arrest warrant. By this new action, the penalty for each HRT violation is a $750,000 fine.

The original arrest warrant had included instructions  that “any and all are hereby authorized to detain, incarcerate, and in the case of violent resistance, use deadly force against proclaimed and verified owner and operator Virgo Triad”. Now that this warrant has been suspended, we can breathe a sigh of relief that it has been replaced by a more humanitarian extortionist demand.

Today’s post is going to explore what a sovereign-citizen-style Citizen’s Arrest looks like in real life. But first, whenever we observe persons involved in this ideology, it must be remembered that many are separate and distinct from each other, and operate under their own “legal” entities which grant them “governing” authority. The subject of today’s article, Michael Wayne Parsons, claims to be an ambassador and associate chief justice of the T’shilhqot’n nation, a dubious entity which is not legally recognized by the United States.

At mikeparsons.org, his About page describes him as follows: 

As we shall see, below the surface of an impressive sounding resume, Parsons’ sovereign citizen style situation ethics landed him in great trouble, where today he sits incarcerated in a Nebraska prison. There are a number of criminal court documents involving the arrest and conviction of Michael Wayne Parsons in the matter which we are going to review.  However, for expediency, I will be relying on Michael Parsons’ appeal of the ruling of Judge Joseph H. Walker, which can be read at this link:  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee at Jackson Case No. W2019-02073-CCA-R3-CD filed 12/15/2011.

According to the appeals document, Michael W. Parsons was “indicted on July 7, 2008, with two counts of aggravated kidnapping, two counts of aggravated assault committed knowingly, one count of burglary of a vehicle, and two counts of theft under $500.”  After a jury trial where Parsons represented himself with the assistance of elbow counsel, he was convicted of two counts of aggravated assault, one count of burglary of a vehicle, and two counts of theft under $500. On appeal, Parsons claimed 5 errors; however, after review, the court held “that the defendant is entitled to no relief” and the trial court’s judgments were affirmed.

Michael Parsons had been raising wolf-hybrids, but on September 24, 2007,  several had escaped through a fence, running over to the neighboring property where Barry Laxton was mowing the yard. Laxton got his .22 rifle and fired into the air to scare the wolf-hybrids away. This was successful, except that one lone animal charged him, and he shot it. During this time, Michael Parsons and his wife, Pat Parsons were out looking for their animals.  The wolf-hybrid which had been shot ran to the defendant and died. In the meantime, Barry Laxton had joined Nick King, who was working on another yard.

In the Appeals document which I have linked to above, on page 2, under Factual and Procedural Background, the core of our Citizen Arrest story is described as follows:

The Defendant accosted Laxton and King, pointed his handgun at them, and told them he was making a citizen’s arrest.  At this point, the Defendant was no longer on his own property.  The Defendant wore an audio-recording device that recorded the encounter. The recording was played for the jury and transcribed. The encounter lasted about four minutes.

At the beginning, the Defendant demands, “Where’s my other dogs?”  King responds, “put the gun down.”  The Defendant asks, “Where’s your gun at?  Drop your gun.”  King replies, “It’s a gun in-” and the Defendant states, “Drop your gun.  Turn around. Turn around.  On the ground. On the ground.”  King again says, “Put your gun down.”  The Defendant then says, “You’re under arrest.  On the ground. I’ll shoot you.” King says again, “Put your gun down.”  The Defendant says, “On the ground. You, too, on the ground now, or you will be shot.  Five, four, three.” 

Laxton says something indiscernible, and the conversation continues in the same vein with the Defendant insisting that the men are under arrest and King repeatedly telling the Defendant to put his gun down.  At one point, the Defendant says, “If you grab that gun, I’m going to shoot.”  The defendant also tells the men to get away from the truck, to “[t]urn around, to [f]ace down,” and to “[l]ay down.”  King calls 911 and tells the dispatcher that he needs assistance because he is “being held at gunpoint”.  The Defendant orders King to [t]ell  them Mark Parsons has a citizen’s arrest on these two.”…

The Defendant again asserts that they are under arrest.

Some years later, Michael Parsons had his parole revoked under warrant No. 14-CR-314 where he was heard in the General Sessions Court of Tennessee for the 25th Judicial Circuit at Covington on February 11, 2016.  He had been charged with being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm.

KRVN.com published an article on May 1, 2017, Indictments Unsealed Against Arapahoe Man & Tennessee Man Charging Felon in possession of a firearm and misprision of felony. It mentions that Michael Wayne Parsons, age 55 of Arlington, Tennessee, is charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm.  Specifically, it alleges Parsons, after conviction of the felony offense of aggravated assault on November 23, 2009, in the Circuit Court of Tipton County, Tennessee was located in Nebraska on January 11, 2017, while in possession of a Rock River 5.56 LAR-15 assault rifle and 637 rounds of ammunition.  The charge carries a possible penalty of up to 10 years’ imprisonment, a $250,000 fine or both.”

While possession of a firearm by a felon is serious, the above article features another incident involving Mike Parsons and his friend, Sue Holland, and others who had concocted a plot to break Parsons out of prison and arrest and kidnap the sheriff of Furnas County and the presiding judge in Tipton County, Tennessee. This is summarized by the U. S. Attorney’s Office in the May 1, 2017 KRVN article, as seen below:

Indictments Unsealed KRVN 5/1/2017 article by U. S. Attorney’s Office

The Appeals document linked in the beginning of this article is 48 pages long, and if one is not familiar with the sovereign citizen mindset when it comes to legal proceedings, the summary of Michael Parsons’ dealings with the court in this particular case is insightful as a predictor of later events.

Rudy and Erin Davis of the Lonestar1776 YouTube channel, which is a feature of their prison ministry, have taken up the cause of Mike Parsons.  Rudy Davis has been referenced before in this blog, in connection to Kent Hovind’s tax protester problems for which he was previously incarcerated for nine years, as well as other jailed sovereign citizens and their causes.  I use the word causes rather than cases, for the Lonestar 1776 channel is known for promoting a highly slanted view of the facts.Before anyone experiences a wave of sympathy sweeping over them for Mike Parsons’ plight, on page 47 of the Appeals document linked to earlier in this post, we are reminded of several factors:  “the Defendant’s refusal to recognize that his actions were wrong”, “his persistent and unrelenting attempts to blame others for his conduct”, “Defendant took it upon himself to accost Laxton and King – a completely innocent bystander-with a loaded gun, point the weapon at them, and threaten to shoot them.”, “the circumstances of the offense were ‘particularly troublesome’ where defendant held a gun six inches from victim’s head”, and “prior troubles with his neighbors due to previous escapes of his wolf-hybrids, as well as his willingness to file questionable legal proceedings against persons he deems to have wronged him in some way”….

On June 27, 2018, Lonestar 1776 published an audio called Mike Parsons (unsentenced) Call from Nebraska Prison. Erin Davis received a phone call from the Douglas County jail, giving the usual prison warning, this call is from a corrections facility and is subject to monitoring, recording, and a location of your phone will be obtained.

Ironically, Mike Parsons’ first words are “I don’t consent to recording of my call”. This, coming from a guy who had recorded his citizen’s arrest, which when the audio was presented to a jury, they found that it had preserved convincing evidence of Parsons’ guilt in that incident.  Erin ignores Mike’s I do not consent statement, and proceeds to not only record his phone call, but publish it on YouTube!

The first words from Erin mention one of Parsons’ latest bug-a-boos; the Youtube channel called Frater I*I, which recently began to post audios from Mike Parson’s trial testimony, along with other sovereign citizen expose style documentation.

At the 1.10 mark of the June 27, 2018 audio, Mike Parsons says, “Well, I got some information from across the water and it was a reference to a YouTube video that’s he’s got on there that’s got a photo of me; it looks like it was taken at the CCA in Kansas-Leavenworth and so obviously if this guy’s got contacts like that he must be tied in with US Marshall Service.  He’s either with the US Marshall’s or with the US Attorney.  That’s the only sources that would have that-you don’t get people’s intake photos from you know for their ID’s unless you’re tied in with those companies and the only people on the outside, it would be with the US Marshall and US Attorney, that’s it.”

“So this guy is a government troll; he’s on the payroll no matter what anybody thinks or says and something about, he’s got  website about Kent Hovind’s Worst Nightmare or something, so this is apparently if it’s that guy that’s name you referenced unless that’s just another screen name.  You know these guys are masters of lies and deception; their whole, whole opera..operation is nothing but a lie.  It’s lies built upon lies, they’re masters of the art of deception and lies.”

“That’s what Satan is, the master of deception but anyway, uh yeah this is not just some flake and sitting in a basement down there twiddling his thumbs doing internet searches, this guy’s on the payroll and it’s all about destroying someone’s character because when you can’t defeat them legally, legitimately, you have to destroy their character and hope that people out there pick up on this stuff and all he’s doing is parodies what he’s been told by other people.”

“The guy is totally ignorant of everything.  I mean the reference that he makes totally ignorant and he claims that he’s got copies of the audios of the phone recording so well the only way he could have gotten that is from the US Attorney, US Marshall or the Sheriff’s Department and I guarantee you the Sheriff’s Department is not putting that stuff out there because they could be sued.  I guarantee it’s the US Marshall, the US Attorney.”

“The US Attorney is, I believe basically trying to you know of course US Marshall works for the US Attorney, so they’re conspira..conspiring to basically destroy my character or try to, of course people that don’t that read this stuff, it sounds good and unless you do a little bit of homework and you realize, Oh another country does have the right to have their own court, they do have the right to issue warrants for the arrest when thy get an indictment and they do have the right to contact fugitive recovery agencies to that, that country’s law enforcement to arrest those people irrespective of what they believe.  Judges are not immune…”(4.10)

Tracking the Leopard Meroz commentParsons is complaining that the YouTube channel Frater I*I has used a photo of him that is not publicly available, and therefore he concludes that the owner of this channel is receiving a paycheck from the government as a troll associated with the US Marshall/US Attorney departments. However, I found the same photo in an article dated May 1, 2017 posted by krvn.com, with a US Attorney’s Office byline,  and the photo of Mike Parsons was a courtesy of the Furnas County Sheriff’s Office. 

krvn.com May 1, 2017 article “Indictments Unsealed Against Arapahoe Man & Tennessee Man Charging Felon in possession of a firearm and misprision of felony” by U. S. Attorney’s Office

What bothers me about the Rudy and Erin Davis prison ministry is that they do not attempt to provide a prisoner, such as Mike Parsons, who has limited access to the outside world, with accurate information. Parsons is going on about his photo, and surmising falsely about who has access to it, and this is feeding into his paranoia.  The YouTube channel Frater I*I is well within his rights to publish this photo which is in the public domain, and also to provide audio clips which can be obtained through PACER on court cases.

Parsons has accused Robert Baty, the founder of the Facebook group Kent Hovind’s Worst Nightmare, of being Frater I*I.  I have read some of the comments by Frater who claims he was in the US Marines some 20 years ago, which Robert Baty never was.  Baty is a retired IRS Appeals Officer, and his internet comments from years back can be read in multiple locations. Baty’s speech patterns are very distinguishable and do not match the style of Frater I*I.

Mike Parsons refers to arrest warrants  “from another country”.  By this he means to justify his false credentials granted by the fabled T’shilhqot’n nation, of which he claims he is an ambassador (diplomatic immunity) and associate chief justice who can legally issue arrest warrants. What justification is there for plotting to kidnap a law enforcement officer and a judge?   Rudy and Erin Davis, who as Christians are held to a high standard, are complicit in his imaginings because it appears they make no attempt to correct Parsons’ misconceptions and false reasoning in regard to others.  When Parsons speaks of others as the masters of deception and ignores his own lies and false reasoning, he not only does not have a case, he does not have a cause.

The very next day, on June 28, 2018, Lonestar 1776 published another phone call from inmate Mike Parsons.  This time it is Rudy Davis who answers the phone and at the 1.20 mark, he says to Parsons, “the other thing is I don’t know what to call him, I don’t even, I hate bringing it even up, this traitor, yeah, OK, I hate bringing up his name, but he’s asking if he can take the last two calls where you discuss him and you, I, I, have one call where it says “Mike Parsons tells Frater off”.  He wants to put that on his channel and I said that’s a decision that you will have to make; that’s not a decision I will make.”

Mike Parsons: (1.42)  “No, I don’t authorize a sociopath to do anything with any of my images or voice.  I’m warning him to immediately remove his channel that has a photograph of me that was inadvertently taken by somebody at a detention facility.  I did not consent to that, I do not consent to him posting it publicly and I demand that you remove it immediately from the internet, delete it from his files and forget he ever heard my name.”

Rudy Davis then informs Parsons that he has screenshotted frater I*I‘ YouTube channel for the record.

For the record, who is probably the largest provider of audio recordings of Mike Parsons on the internet, besides the ones which are found in the public court records?  How about Lonestar 1776, which publishes recordings of Mike Parsons, despite the fact that he does not consent to having his voice recorded. Mr. Parsons, let your speculative talents run wild on that one.

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

The Framework in which Truth is Examined

When you find a man playing “tough”, it is because he knows he has an advantage. All you have to do is shift the scenery to an environment where he doesn’t have the advantage then, nine times out of ten, his TOUGHNESS disappears.” (page 61 from Custer’s Last Stand by Dr. Peter S. Ruckman)

Back in June 2017 I began to look at the major “players” which were gathered around the Port of Charleston dirty bomb incident. I wrote a number of  posts on some of those persons based on the observations I had made at that point in time.  Back then, I could see a RICO lawsuit coming. In fact, I still have an unfinished post from August of 2017 which I never got around to publishing called RICOcheting and RACKETeering, using the cartoon below to illustrate the end game of all those adversarial standoffs which were happening back then.

Prior to Robert David Steele filing his defamation lawsuit,  I had been observing Dave (Acton) Sweigert, and learning about preservation of evidence and spoliation. He had been warning several individuals of possible copyright or trademark violations, wire fraud, obstruction of justice or criminal investigations, intimidation or coercion of government, monetization of YouTube accounts, harassment, and  crowdstalking, which are all aspects of filing a successful RICO lawsuit.  All of these words, or derivatives of these concepts, are found in the definition of racketeering activity in the U.S. Code sections which outline the provisions of the RICO Act.

Although Dave Sweigert refers to himself as a non-attorney layman, he has a hands on experience with legal matters,  stemming from being the Pro Se Plaintiff in several Qui Tam lawsuits many years ago. Thus Sweigert is in a category all his own, in this strange saga.  One year later, we find that Jason Goodman is facing two Federal Civil Court lawsuits; one structured on defamation and conspiracy laws, and the other based on the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. The framework in which truth is examined is shifting from YouTube striking competitions to an arena where federal civil court procedures, statutes, regulations and case law are argued before a Judge.  Even when a jury trial is requested, it is a long winding road through a legal  forest before discovery and trial by a jury of peers becomes a reality.

From his YouTube platform,  Jason Goodman vacillates between being a tough guy who is comfortable breaching the boundaries of good taste and decorum when accusing his adversaries, and a woe is me, I’ve been framed cry baby. So while we all wait for the summons to be served,  I came across these oblique, but provoking words from Jason Goodman just two days ago. (But first, it is necessary for me to post a screenshot of the applicable CSTT show, in order to ward off a team of monkeys who are headed my way.)

In case you have misplaced your binoculars, the message below “500 Internal Server Error” reads, “Sorry, something went wrong. A team of highly trained monkeys has been dispatched to deal with this situation. If you see them, send them this information as text (screenshots frighten them).”  As you can see, I chose “B”, the screenshot option.

Getting back to the Jason Goodman quotation I was referring to, we hear,  “I may not necessarily know exactly what may or may not have happened to Quinn Michaels, but the second we started discussing it, it was met with derision, it was basically described as you know crazy talk and Star Trek Technology by someone who we have evidence was actually tracking Quinn Michaels and knew of his location when the injury occurred.” (Jason Goodman, 1.02.59 mark of the June 19, 2018 Crowdsource the Truth You Tube video, “The Hidden Triggers of Mass Mind Control with Special Guests Ole Dammegard and Cody Snodgres”.) 

Evidence.  It seems we are always waiting for the evidence…..and if any is presented, has it been tainted?

To provide context for Jason Goodman’s comment, we must go back to April 6, 2018 when Lift The Veil published a YouTube video called, Jason Goodman Calls Lift the Veil. One point of interest in this rambling monologue is found at the 13.14 mark, when Jason Goodman references what he terms, a decentralized distributed defamation attack.  He follows this with a broad discussion of various persons which he names, who he has had problems with in the prior year, and then at the 26.35 mark he again declares, “a new type of crime is taking place; a distributed decentralized defamation attack“.

At the 26.52 mark, Jason Goodman states,  “I called the FBI and I submitted a complaint that took about 45 minutes and in less than 24 hours I got a return phone call and I spent over three hours on the phone and have shared extensive evidence with the FBI and I find it very interesting how agitated Mr. Dave Acton has become.  I think everyone knows I have good contacts at the FBI. I’ve had retired FBI agent Robyn Gritz on my program many times.  I’ve had Thomas Paine of True Pundit, whose real identity I know very well and will not share with anyone, but I have verified that this person is a person who has a great deal of credibility and a tremendous amount of very well vetted law enforcement, active law enforcement sources and these people have assisted me and guided me as to what to do with the information.”

“And they’ve even shared things with me that I’m not prepared to share with you on this program, but tell me that everything Dave Acton is saying is false.  Dave Acton is also at best delusional, at worst psychotic, but he’s you know almost everything that guy says is a crazy manipulation and he seems to be becoming unhinged, primarily because his operation is failing and if he’s the magnificent genius who’s involved in Homeland Security and all these depositions that he talks about, why is he so ineffective for the past nine months that’s stopping little old me, a retired cinematographer who has designed a couple of 3D cameras…” (28.24) Then Jason Goodman continued to discuss his problems with various individuals.

When Jason Goodman said that he has “evidence” of someone tracking Quinn Michaels, this matter was duly noted on May 29, 2018, in Document 55 (Third Declaration of D. George Sweigert) which had been filed in Robert David Steele’s federal civil court defamation lawsuit.  Exhibit 2 of this declaration shows a screenshot of Crowdsource the Truth 2‘s April 21, 2018 broadcast where Jason Goodman says at the 1:12:22 mark, “Right.  And Dave (the undersigned) implores me to present the evidence that we have that indicated that he (the undersigned) knew your (Quinn) location in Vaughn, New Mexico right before his (Quinn) lung collapsed spontaneously.”

So Dave Sweigert had implored Jason Goodman to present his evidence!  I assume that nothing tangible was ever presented in the public domain, as Goodman is still dangling that invisible carrot on the end of a stick.

In response to the above quotation of Jason Goodman, D. George Sweigert declared,  “I hereby DENY all allegations and accusations made by Mr. Goodman that I had ANY knowledge-whatsoever-that CSTT 2.0’s researcher (Quinn Michaels) was in New Mexico-much less the city of Vaughn- when Quinn Michaels suffered a collapsed lung. This entire stream of logic is denied in all its forms by the undersigned.”

Jason Goodman’s racket ball game has now entered the Big Leagues:  Pro Se Plaintiff versus Pro Se Defendant in the Federal Civil Court 

At some point in the future, Jason Goodman will have to reply to the Federal Civil court RICO complaint filed by Sweigert. The court has sanctions for making false and unproved statements, and so this new environment will test the veracity of everyone who will be included in this case.

One of the acts of Jason Goodman, which I had not known about till recently, was described on  page 23 of the RICO complaint as, “…the plaintiff has had to endure Goodman telephoning every ambulance Emergency Medical Service system in Mt. Shasta, CA to report that Goodman has contacted the F. B. I. concerning the plaintiff”. Considering that we have seen no proof of these allegations which had been made to the FBI, I find Goodman’s behavior to be over-the-top, in his attempt to discredit Sweigert’s reputation before his professional peers.

What we are viewing in all of this Youtubing “war of the worlds” is the systematic dissolving of the boundaries of social discourse which allow all Americans to freely speak their own viewpoints, as long as defamatory statements,  as defined by law, are not made.  Whether one describes the speech activities on YouTube as personal or as investigative journalism, there is no place for making serious unfounded allegations when no genuine supporting evidence is presented.

I am hopeful that the filing of a RICO lawsuit which embodies a complaint and inquiry into the strange circumstances of the Port of Charleston dirty bomb incident, will benefit the public’s interest in protecting our fragile economic infrastructure. It took a non-attorney layman, Dave Sweigert, to bring this incident into the structured, reasoning, boundaries of the judicial system, and I commend him for doing so. 

So why wasn’t Robert David Steele’s lawsuit structured as a RICO complaint?  After all, the beginning of his troubles with Jason Goodman and CSTT started because of the Port of Charleston incident, and his defamation lawsuit displays many of the same  elements which are found in a RICO case.  For example, take a look at this screenshot of a remark made by Robert David Steele to Benjamin Fulford which I quoted in my March 21, 2018 article, And in this corner:  A Man Called SUE Contending Against Leviathan, Behemoth and God Almighty!

RICO lawsuits allow triple damages and are against conspirator/racketeer types

In addition, Steele has suggested that others with similar legal complaints might “band” together as a sort of unified force, similar to the class action concept,  against the Deep State. Robert David Steele is quoted in this screenshot  below, taken from my November 12, 2017 article, Robert David Steele & His List of Crowdstalkers & Co-Conspirators:  Is Your Name On This List?

One of the major elements of Dave Sweigert’s RICO lawsuit is the Port of Charleston dirty bomb incident.  In addition to naming Jason Goodman as defendant, others are included as wrongdoers, including George Webb Sweigert,  Okey Marshall Richards and Joe Napoli. In a personal defamation lawsuit, the plaintiff has no standing to represent the interests of others, such as the Coast Guard or the Port of Charleston.  However, in a RICO lawsuit, which is a form of class action complaint, those entities can be included as victims of the wrongdoing of the named racketeers.

I am no attorney, but it seems to me that the primary reason Steele would structure his lawsuit as a personal defamation, asking for triple damages due to the conspiracy of his defendants, rather than as a RICO lawsuit, is because he was instrumental in trying to cover over George Webb’s complicity in the dirty bomb false report incident. The following two screenshots are taken from my September 21, 2017 article Operation WHIPLASH.  (RDS’s words are in black, mine are in blue.)I  had three motivations in coming down hard on Dave Sweigert’s Port of Charleston report which he sold on Amazon.com. The first had to do with its unfinished presentation, which defeated the stated purpose of being a report which could be sent to interested Congressional members.  The second reason was that the report was  weighted more heavily against Jason Goodman than George Webb who was the primary connection to the source of false information which came from a former FBI agent provocateur.  I did not want Sweigert’s arguments to be nullified in the same manner as Robert David Steele had done in the above screenshots.  And thirdly, when presenting a legal argument, it is better to show the plain facts succinctly, without embellishment.

After reading through Dave Sweigert’s RICO complaint which was filed in federal court on June 14, 2018, I find it to be a crisply worded legal document that touches on all of the important aspects of his case, without becoming too lengthy.  Because he has attached his exhibits at the end, the overall look is professional.  This is in contrast to the Robert David Steele amended complaint which includes numerous screenshots of ridiculous images which have been embedded within the complaint itself.  One is left with the impression that attorney Biss took a PDF of  Robert David Steele’s research and poured it into a template of a defamation lawsuit, without editing it.  We shall see how things progress in both lawsuits over the coming months.

Thumbs up to Dave Sweigert for representing the public’s interest in protecting our social media and economic infrastructures from individuals who are lowering the bar of journalism and jeopardizing our societal protections.

The framework in which truth is examined is essential to the cause of justice and social stability, and I am glad Sweigert has shifted some of these issues, which were being trampled under foot in the social media, to the federal court system. While his lawsuit is a RICO civil case, we may yet see in the future that the U.S. Attorney General, as representing the government’s interests in the Port of Charleston incident, will be induced to file a criminal RICO lawsuit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FLAG DAY

June 14th is Flag Day in the United States of America, and commemorates the June 14, 1777 resolution of the Second Continental Congress’s adoption of our nation’s flag.Last year on June 14, 2017 Crowdsource The Truth memorialized Flag Day by shutting down the Port of Charleston with the false report of a dirty bomb.  This year on Flag Day,  Jason Goodman’s CSTT operation was honored by the filing of a RICO lawsuit against them by plaintiff  D. George Sweigert in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. This complaint can also be read as Document 60 in the Robert David Steele defamation lawsuit.

Those documents are linked here:  sweigert south carolina rico 1 and sweigert south carolina rico 2

So what was Jason Goodman doing on this year’s Flag Day? He was interviewing, along with Quinn Michaels, a man named Ted Visner about Corruption Within Child Protective Services.

Does anybody know who Ted Visner is?  Looking over the comments under this video, one CSTT Vetting Agent knew, but did not elaborate further.  The rest of the Vetters were asleep on their watch; some even thought it was a great interview.  At the beginning of this video, Jason Goodman offers his disclaimer, as duly noted in the following screenshot.

Disclaimer of Jason Goodman with regard to Ted Visner: “You and I have only just become acquainted today”. I suppose that lays the foundation for not asking reasonable questions of his guest.

In keeping with the Flag Day theme, we should first note that on Visner’s website, visner4sheriff.wordpress.com, he had posted the following patriotic notice 3 years ago, on August 10, 2015.So in addition to Visner’s readiness to take over in the event of  the imminent collapse of the current structure of government, his past desire to run for Sheriff, and his recent legal problems involving marijuana,  we must ask why Jason Goodman’s first question to him is, “Ted, you’ve got a harrowing tale to tell us about the Child Protective Services, is that correct?” This particular topic has been brought up to help us to sympathize with Quinn Michaels’ own woeful tales of his CPS encounters.  And there Quinn is seen sitting in the same room as Jason Goodman as they are now constant companions, and will continue to be so far into the future,  as they are both highlighted in Dave Sweigert’s RICO lawsuit.

Visner’s sad story is about his girlfriend’s three children that had been removed by the state of Michigan “because she had a dirty house and there were dirty dishes”.  This is not really HIS story, unless he was the one who left the house messy when CPS happened to show up. Visner considers himself a noble and worthy advocate for persons who have been unjustly treated by Child Protective Services.  He knows all about children in untenable situations, for around that time he owed $30,000 in back child support for his own children in Washington State.

Ted Visner complains about the following Officer Safety Caution which features him.Here is a video which Ted Visner put out on his YouTube channel on July 11, 2015 which got him almost 427,000 views.  He has titled it, First Shots of the Revolution About To Be Fired in Isabella County Michigan. The description under this video says,  After being denied due process (defenses to eviction) I am making a stand and fulfilling my oath to defend this country against all enemies, foreign and domestic as an American Patriot.  Apparently, Ted Visner is a real flag waver.At the 1.08 mark, Ted Visner says, “This is the start, folks.  I would imagine that they’d show up with a SWAT team, a bunch of armed men and it’ll go down like the Bundy Ranch, only with no opposition.  And I will be executed by the same Sheriff’s Department that stole a different house in 2010.  These guys have taken plausible deniability to an entirely new level.”

So what is the story behind the house evictions? An article by the morningsun.com dated September 17, 2015, says, “Visner, 48, was arrested early Thursday morning at Maxfield’s restaurant in Edmore on a warrant charging him with squatting and trespassing at a home at 7287 W. Fremont Road in Rolland Township.  That home was formerly owned by Kathy Smith, whom Visner refers to as his wife, but is listed in court documents as his longtime girlfriend. Smith had not been living in the home but Visner remained after Judge Eric Janes signed an eviction order in Junge giving possession to the legal owner, Bank of America. Bank of America purchased the unfinished home at auction because Smith defaulted on mortgage payments.”

“Police using bomb squads and tracking dogs searched the home and surrounding property as a precaution because Visner vowed armed resistance to being removed, and Sheriff Leo Mioduszewski said he didn’t want to take any chances. Mioduszewski said police arrested Visner in the parking lot of Maxfield’s restaurant in Edmore, where he was apparently going to attend a meeting of his self-formed People’s Unified Militia of Michigan…Mioduszewski said process servers typically handle evictions but police chose to evict Visner because of his previous threats.”

MFI-Miami.com wrote an article in January of 2016, called Wannabe Domestic Terrorist, Convicted Squatter and Deadbeat Dad Ted Visner Goes Full Blown Sovereign Citizen Crazy on Federal Bankruptcy Judge.  This article describes some of Visner’s background, but what I found interesting was his attempt to play lawyer based on the sovereign citizen movement point of view. One of the sentences in his legal papers which is interesting says, “This court is being ORDERED to show cause as to why it unlawfully converted the Debtors Objection Hearing on October 6, 2010 to a Creditor’s Motion Hearing and calling the prophylactic filed on September 20, 2010 by Shelly Sweet and Bruce Havens titled “Notice of Intent to Self/Take Possession” a Motion when it was clearly NOT A MOTION.”  MFI-Miami comments, “Prophylactic?  It appears the only disease Sweet and Havens was trying to prevent was Visner’s apparent mental illness.”

It must be remembered that Visner never had any legal standing with regard to the foreclosure.  His name was not on the documents; which meant that he was a squatter on the property. In other words, he lied about having his rights denied. Given the threats he had openly made, why would anyone think he is fit to be around children?

Here is how other militias came to regard his “plight”. All of this information was online from a couple of years back, and could have been easily discovered by the Crowdsource the Truth community.

It seems that vile men are being exalted as just men in the Alternative News Media these days. And because they are being hailed as heroes fighting against corruption, that means that the reputations of law enforcement, Child Protective Service employees, and Judges are being routinely slandered in order to distort the facts and evidence of what really took place.  Will Jason Goodman set the record straight? Is he asking Ted Visner’s “legal” advice on how one files a prophylactic in a RICO lawsuit? Will Flag Day ever return to normal again?

 

 

 

 

 

NO MORE INFORMANTS Man of the Year GEORGE WEBB: The Man Who Could Have Shut Down an Informant but instead Shut Down the Port of Charleston

A BLOBBER is an American term from the early 1925 era,  for an INFORMER.   (Henry Leverage, “Dictionary of the Underworld”)

image found on billwarnerpi.com

Due to a false report from George Webb’s blobber  with the code name Deep Uranium, the Port of Charleston was shut down for eight hours on June 14, 2017 while the Coast Guard and other government agencies checked out what turned out to be  false information that a dirty bomb might have been onboard the Maersk Memphis.

Four days later, Radio Patriots.net reposted a December 2015 article by George Webb on the No More Informants site as shown in part below:“I NEVER BELIEVE MUCH IN CONSPIRACY THEORIES.  I REQUIRE TOO MUCH PROOF.”  Thus saith George Webb (Sweigert), the man who gets much of his information from sources like Deep Uranium, Deep Trade, his French connection,…..and other blobbering experts.

Here is another writing sample from George Webb which was published about 20 months prior to his reliance on his Deep Uranium hidden source, now believed to be the former FBI informant, Okey Marshall Richards,  who sold out his militia as an agent provocateur in the late 1990’s.What George Webb does not tell his readers, is the exact source where he obtained his numbers.  Because of that, I question his statistics.  As I recall from prior reading on my part, it was not 100,000 paid informants as Webb states, but rather 10,000; at least as stated in interviews with former CIA agent Kevin Shipp, the author of a 2012 book, From the Company of Shadows. Even years later, Shipp was making the rounds of the internet about the secret code he had in his book.  It was in one interview with Shipp that the Hagmann Report had quoted the 10,000 paid informants statistics.  This was mentioned in my October 21, 2016 article, Disinformation, Black Ops, Two-Faced Bloggers and The Art of the Illogical Argument.

But Webb’s other statement that the FBI had 50,000 paid informants in 2008 should have been sourced, as well as the 100,000 informant statement.  Recently I had been reading that the FBI has 15,000 paid informants. Why is it left up to the reader (or viewer)  of George Webb to have to second guess the source of his statements? I do not know where he is getting his statistics, so I am left to wonder if he misquoted others who had discussed the same topic on the internet.

In light of the Port of Charleston dirty bomb incident, how should we regard Webb’s declaration, “I never believe much in conspiracy theories.  I require too much proof.”? In this case, I am going to take his word, and assume that he knew exactly who Deep Uranium was, when he got entangled in the June 14, 2017 dirty bomb incident at the Port of Charleston.  One hundred percent complicity, because this is a man who says he requires too much proof.

I hereby nominate George Webb for the No More Informants’ Man of the Year Award.