Night of the Betrayers: The Communion of the Blood Crowned with Dirt

“For he knew who should betray him; therefore  said he, Ye are not all clean.” John 13:11

“Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son Of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?”  Hebrew 10:29

I do not listen any longer to Hagmann and Hagmann on blog talk radio, unless it is brought to my attention that there is a particular show which is of interest to my blog Tracking the Leopard Meroz.  Recently I read a comment on the internet made by barbF which reads in part, “On May 1, 2015 (a high Satanic Holy Day) Quayle and David Lankford conducted a “Communion” Service where they incorporated Dirt into the service.  This is Elemental Magic and Strange Fire-Mixing the Holy with the Profane… Everyone who participated that night put their families under the three to four generation curse of witchcraft and they need to confess it as sin and renounce the curse breaking it in the name of Jesus.” As it appears that at least one alternative news website has censored this comment, I thought that I would add my witness, and review the May 1, 2015 Hagmann and Hagmann radio show also.

May Day May Day May Day!!!

May Day May Day May Day!!!

At the beginning of the May 1st broadcast, we hear Doug Hagmann declaring that this program would be solemn; “a call for consecration, repentance, communion and imprecatory prayer”.  In honor of  the feast of Beltane, and the May Day tradition of leaving flowers on the neighbor’s door steps, Hagmann reads a commercial for ProFlowers.

Later on in the program, we are informed that the Communion Service has been planned to be performed at the top of the hour, after the commercial break. Therefore I begin to comprehend why Lankford and Quayle fill up the first hour with longwinded, self serving speeches, overturning what in a traditional church service would be a Biblically succinct exhortation.  If I had been in a church which was holding a communion service intertwined with commercial announcements, I would have walked out.  But like Judas Iscariot who would not be separated from his “bag”,  the “determinate counsel and foreknowledge” of  the trinity of Hagmann, Quayle, and  Lankford had decreed that their “solemn holy convocation” should  be marred by the thirty pieces of silver held in their hot little hands.

And as I had determined beforehand to listen to this broadcast, I could not walk out; not yet, anyway.

I concentrated on writing down the scriptures which Lankford quoted and identified by verse number, for further study. But somewhere between the beginning of this broadcast, when I noted the phrase  character assassinations, and later on when Quayle spoke of the judgment of  Ananias and Sapphira, I  observed the undercurrent of these code phrases. These phrases had been used in Hagmann’s February 10, 2015 broadcast, and in Hagmann and Quayle’s written condemnation of both Marinka Peschmann and the author of the Revelationnow blog.

Lankford began his speech by discussing Repentance.  I identified 14 verses plus the 68 verses of Deuteronomy 28, but he also quickly quoted other scriptures, which he did not locate in the Bible, for our edification. Given the proud and haughty scorn which was displayed by Doug Hagmann and Steve Quayle in their Joint Response on February 10th, just 80 days before, how did Pastor Lankford overlook Luke 18:9-14 which pertains to the sins of his closest friends?

Luke 18:9-14 is a direct quote of Jesus Christ: “Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican.  The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican.  I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess.  And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.  I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other:  for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.”

Prior to taking communion, as a sacrament, rather than as an ordinance; Steve Quayle introduces his dirt ritual.   Quayle emphasizes two non essential things about the dirt which he personally was using, in his manmade ritual. First he noted that the container for his dirt was square.  Secondly, when he threw the dirt on his head, he pointed out that he did it with his Left Hand. I will leave it with the reader to understand what those two words symbolize in the occult realm. Steve Quayle says, “Look at your dirt.  That’s what you were before God breathed into Adam” to make him a living soul. He does not mention that the Bible distinguishes between dust and dirt, but that is an interesting word study in itself.  Also not mentioned is that God  created us in his image;  our souls have an everlasting existence, so that we are not extinguished at death.  We have sinned against God who created us in his image, and whether or not we believe in Jesus Christ as our Saviour, will determine whether we will reside in Heaven or Hell after our death. Note that all of creation came from the dust, not just mankind. And in the Bible, dirt is more like that of clay or mire, or the contents of the intestines.

Steve Quayle, as he tends to do, gives us another rant against those who criticize him.  And as always, he dismisses them by declaring that they have not performed the charitable, evangelistic works that he has done.  Therefore he warns these critics that they should not take communion with him.  I guess he means that since he is a part of the body of Christ, and either they are not, or they are personally sinning against him, that they are unworthy to take Communion. He reminds us of his prior threats that the days of Ananias and Sapphira are coming back into the church.  Then Steve Quayle throws his dirt into the air so that it falls on top of him.  He recommends adding to his example,  a request to God, to  “Do with me as you will”.

Somehow Quayle reminds me of Judas Iscariot. When we review all of the  scriptural passages on Judas, we discover that he partook in the Last Supper of Jesus Christ.  Jesus warned his twelve disciples in John 13:10b-11, “and ye are clean, but not all.  For he knew who should betray him; therefore said he, Ye are not all clean”. In verse 18 Jesus says, “I speak not of you all:  I know whom I have chosen: but that the scripture may be fulfilled, He that eateth bread with me hath lifted up his heel against me.” Verse 25,  notes that John, “He then lying on Jesus’ breast saith unto him, Lord, who is it?” Jesus gives him a sign to show that it was Judas Iscariot.

Therefore when we see  Steve Quayle  throwing dirt upon himself to make himself unclean, he is identifying with Judas Iscariot, the betrayer of Jesus Christ.  The Diadem of Meroz (the communion of the blood) is Dirt.  Matthew 26:25 reveals, “Then Judas, which betrayed him, answered and said, Master, is it I?  He said unto him, Thou hast said.”

Steve Quayle says that he intended to keep the remainder of his dirt for 40 days as a remembrance that he was “nothing”. Since his forty days of temptation have passed, has anyone observed that he has repented of the exceeding sinfulness of sin in his heart? Of course not, as the man of Meroz revealed, he considers himself to be the communion of the blood.

Matthew 27:3-6 shows us the repentance of Judas, which is not unto salvation, saying, “Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood.  And they said, What is that to us?  see thou to that.  And he cast down the silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.” As barbF has warned for the past two months, those who partook of the dirt communion service should repent of their error. The depths of Satan are far deeper than most of us can understand.




The Balancings of Uzzah

Through desire a man, having separated himself, seeketh and intermeddleth with all wisdom.  Proverbs 18:1

And when they came to Nachon’s threshing floor, Uzzah put forth his hand to the ark of God, and took hold of it; for the oxen shook it.  And the anger of the LORD was kindled against Uzzah; and God smote him there for his error; and there he died by the ark of God.  2 Samuel 6:6-7

On May 2, 2014 the Hagmann and Hagmann blogtalk radio show featured a three hour monologue by W, the Intelligence Insider. At the introduction of this broadcast, it was recommended that the listeners review the article written on March 21, 2013 by Doug Hagmann entitled, Life As An Investigator Is Like A Box of Chocolates. Because of the length of the show, and the nuances of the monologue and of the article, this post presumes that the reader is familiar with the content of both messages.

Doug Hagmann introduces W, the Intelligence Insider, as “the real James Bond”, in the recesses and shadows, and mentions the Watergate parking garage, and the taking down of the Soviet Union. W is described as having “integrity and character” and as a “real man’s man”.  We are offered no proof of this, nor a list of other credentials, so we hold our breath at the mystery of such a highly esteemed guest.

So W is like James Bond?

So W is like James Bond?

I then pause the broadcast to read Doug Hagmann’s article, which turns out to be a first person recollection of a narrative given by an anonymous investigator friend who once worked in the realm of physics, presumably at Area 51. This friend of Hagmann is actually W, The Intelligence Insider. He recollects his younger days when he found himself involved in a mysterious set of events.  As a result, he discovers that the very wealthy on this planet believe that they have triple strand DNA, rather than the double strand of the less influential humans on earth.   Generations of these royal families intermarry among themselves to keep their alien blood “pure”.

W  then provides Doug Hagmann with a quippy “law of the investigator”: Belief is the driver of action”.  We have heard this  very quip stated many times by Doug Hagmann on his radio shows.  We are then advised to “Follow the Blood Trail”. Supposedly both the double and the triple stranded DNA has the informational encoding to make ‘good or ‘evil’.  In bold lettering the article declares, “Yes, the DNA, and the serpentine creature entangled in it potentially bore the information/knowledge/blueprint to create good or evil!”

We are given a quote from Pellegrini, Powell and Sir Isacc Asimov who penned the”Three Laws of Alien Behavior”: first, their survival will be more important than our survival; second wimps don’t become top dogs; and third, they will assume that the first two laws apply to us.

With all of this sage advice from W, Hagmann in bold letters declares, “It doesn’t really matter what I believe!”  It only matters what ‘THEY’ believe,…” referring to this group of “superior alien/humans!”

After all this ungodly doctrine becomes a part of my conscious mind,  I venture back to the broadcast to hear the rest of W‘s monologue.  I take notes.  Doug Hagmann says that he has numerous notebooks filled with notes that he has taken from listening to the Intelligence Insider’s intermeddlings with wisdom.  Oops. I inserted my own opinion.  I am sure that Hagmann meant W’s sage counsel.

We are never  given a title, nor a summary of the thesis of W, at the beginning of his monologue. But we are informed that it has something to do with  physics and the history of the mind of the people who run the planet. W acknowledges that the Hagmann show is aimed at Christians. So to stop us from thinking like Christians, he begins by saying that when certain trigger words are heard, the listener tends to tune out the speaker.  And what trigger word is he referring to?  It is Richard Hoagland.  Then he drums into our little minds that dictum: It’s not what you believe:  It’s what they believe who run the planet.

So W is going to show us the “driver behind the New World Order.”  Well, maybe Mr. W, you are the driver of the NWO limousine. I have examined many a mindset which is different from my own Christian worldview, and never has the Bible instructed me to cut the plumb line of Scripture, so that I cannot accurately measure the variance from truth which underlies the assertions of others.

Since W does not refer to Richard Hoagland at this point in his monologue, we continue to hear a short history of the Pharaoh’s and their after death rituals which were designed to allow their royalty to continue into the next life as gods.  He makes reference to the silent hiding of the bones of giants which had been obtained by the Smithsonian, asking “for what purpose” have they been kept hidden?  From here we hear the question, “What is consciousness?” and “Where is consciousness?” W discusses near death experiences, some in the body, and some out of the body. As an example, he mentions the use of a remote controlled airplane, with the Controller giving information and direction to a physical object.

Then W moves onto observations which were noted from cloning experiments, pertaining to cloned dogs that had “remembered” the learned commands of the original dog, and not just the instincts encoded in their DNA.  From here he ventures into the use of three tools of Science  which produce measurable data for study:  these are electricity, magnetism, and light. He suggests that these three are facets of the same material, separated out in our observations in the same manner as a prism separates light into colors. W says that the smallest length we can measure is two widths of an electron, and asks, Is that the smallest thing that exists?  His point is that there are boundaries to our observations, but that does not mean that the existence of “something else” is not out there, such as Dark Matter, which would be the majority of the universe.  He asks whether or not this dark matter has an effect on us, and how one might measure it.

Now as a listener, I have disobeyed W‘s dictum that my beliefs do not matter when considering the driving beliefs of the superior intelligence of aliens.  So in my state of resistance, I make a mental note that at no time does W refer to Scripture in his discussion.  If Scripture speaks of these aliens, and it does, and the Scriptures cannot be broken, and the God in heaven who is the Creator of us all is our Final Authority, then why not refer to, say, Hebrews 11:3, “Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.” And further in verse 5 it says that “By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.” This verse is an interesting one in relation to our soul and consciousness and the matter of death of the body.   Normally we die when our soul (our consciousness which has its own form) which is connected to our body through a silver cord (Ecclesiastes 12:6) is loosed.  Are these scriptures, which are truth whether revealed or self-evident, not germain to the discussion of Consciousness?

God says he shall judge our deeds, and that be whether we be in the body, or out of body through our own will power. Gentiles as well as Jews, according to Romans 2:15-16 ” show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another”; and this will be proven “In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.”

The Illuminati are human, because they have the double stranded DNA as the foundation of their physical being; and if something has been added, not through any fault of their own, they still are in a position to be saved; for it does matter what the individual believes regardless of what the powerful royal blue bloods profess. Romans 2:15 teaches that our conscience is not just consciousness, but similar to a scale of balances, weighing everything against a Standard.  When you destroy the words of God as Absolute Standard, you sear the conscience, and destroy its ability to rightly judge.

W continues on to argue that Consciousness resides in something more real, denser and more powerful than the human body.  That place where Consciousness would be recorded would be Dark Matter according to his hypothesis; our body is but an avatar.  At this point he reintroduces that Trigger Word, Richard Hoagland, who he says is not a Christian, but a Scientist. W says that Hoaglund provides evidence, data points, and presents repeatable experiments. And he tells us about Hoaglund’s experiments with an Accutron Watch, which has been taken to certain solar events to establish the presence of a disruption in the torsion field.

At this point, it would be wise for the reader to read a couple of scientifically based arguments against Hoaglund’s “evidence”.  As one witty person noted, Hoaglund shoots an arrow at a barn, and then paints a target around the arrow.  See Exposing Psuedo Astronomy’s “Properly Designing An Experiment to Measure Richard Hoagland’s Torsion Field, If It Were Real”.  See also Richard Hoagland’s FAIL.  These are only two articles, written long before W’s monologue, which take to task the unscientific methods of Richard Hoaglund. One of the things which he fails to do in his experiments is to provide base measurements, by which to compare his results.  This does not seem to bother W, which is no surprise, for both W and Doug Hagmann encourage us to get rid of the base measurements of Absolute Truth, before we hear or read what they have to say about the agenda of  those “superior” aliens.  When I looked around the internet for articles in connection with Richard Hoaglund, I also found two complaints of plagiarism against him from real scientists.

Apparently, there is no evidence that anyone anywhere has repeated Richard Hoaglund’s experiments, and isn’t he supposed to be the real deal Scientist according to W? W keeps hinting that he himself writes physics papers, so when I looked for his papers, any paper, on the internet, I wound up on some forum site called BlackNet, where W, as Wayne Willott of Seattle makes comments, like “have to go, something is burning in the lab” and mentioning the technical phrases he uses on his broadcast. Is this just another stage name, or what?  Where are his credentials, any credentials, besides that of a Baloney manufacturer? If he were a real physics scientist in a real lab, why does he have to rely on Trigger Words (i.e. Richard Hoagland, etc.) to “prove” his “thesis”.  And by the way, what was your thesis Mr. W? I am having a hard time grasping your purposes. Years ago I studied engineering physics taught by a professor who had worked on the Manhattan Project. And somehow with my little mind I understood him.  I  also understand the Bible references to giants, etc.

At the end of your monologue, there is a slight reference to the salvation of the Christian, and the thought that devils which shortly will have a final judgment are looking for a way of escape among the blessed of humanity. But what were the thoughts and  intents of your heart(Hebrews 4:12-13) in providing three hours of fraudulent ungodly reasoning to a Christian audience? Perhaps the dangers inherent in Revelation 13:15-18 regarding the image of the beast and his mark are looming too close to you personally, for it is obvious that you are a highly compromised person, or you would not be hiding behind a façade.  Belief is the Driver of Action.secret agent