Gavin Seim Extemporizes on His Perils and Rudy Davis Offers Up A Sevenfold Curse of Destruction As A Gesture of Love towards Their Enemies

If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold.  Genesis 4:24

“I appeal to heaven.” said Gavin Seim as he was being stretched out on a cross of self- crucifixion.  On January 15, 2015 he was sentenced to spend 14 days with an ankle bracelet and $700 in fines.

In a November 28, 2017 Spokesman-Review article by Shawn Vestal, headlined,  “Self-described ‘constitutionalist’ Gavin Seim flees to Mexico to avoid court”, we read, “In the online-world of conspiratorial patriot poseurs, Ephrata’s Gavin Seim has repeatedly cast himself as a hero, a valiant knight in battle with the tyrannical “psychopaths” of the justice system of Grant County and America itself. Now he’s fled to Mexico, dodging a charge of obstruction of justice that arose from his repeated, petty harassment of cops on the job in Ephrata.  Seim sees his flight to Mexico in the most heroic of terms, of course.  While urging people to donate to his cause”.

Gavin Seim, who comes from a close-knit family with similar arrest records, had urged persons to send him donations a couple of years back when he had rallied around the heroes of the Bundy Oregon Standoff. Subsequently,  Paul Fielding filed  this online petition  which declared, “Gavin Seim, self-styled ‘patriot’ and supporter of freedom and liberty, has been accepting donations he claims he is using for education and direct support for jailed defendants in Oregon and Nevada.  Yet, he is spending thousands of dollars on a luxury RV, ham radio equipment and a drone, none of which are directly supportive of his claimed mission.  As donors and supporters, we want Gavin to divulge how much money he has received, and where it has gone.” 149 supporters had signed this petition, short of the 200 needed, but one left a comment explaining that they desired “transparency for the patriot movement”.

So today we are going to examine a video recently produced by Gavin Seims which provides the transparency which his fellow patriots have long desired, as he explains his reasons for taking a road trip with his wife and children to Mexico in their day of imminent peril. As a professional photographer, an herbalist, and a co-writer of fictional works with his brother Nathan, Gavin’s latest video is a masterpiece of schlocky scripting and video cinematography balanced out with America The Beautiful background music and other mood enhancing sounds. In a December 27, 2012 Twitter account of the Brothers Seim @writerscouch  we read “Writing is a lot like taking a photograph.  If you don’t have a subject, a story & focus you’ve probably already failed.” Sensing that we are about to enter that failure zone, let us see what the subject, story,  and focus is, in the video under examination.

Robert Baty routinely follows the stories of those who are apologists for Kent Hovind and his tax fraud and legal woes.  On his website, kehvrlb.com, under the headline, Rudy Davis Threatens Prosecutors!, can be found a link to a video which was published on the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) Hatewatch You tube channel on November 29, 2017 under the title, Gavin Seim Skips Court Date, Heads to Mexico.

Robert Baty was interested in the last 2 minutes of this 9 minute video which features a recorded phone message which Rudy Davis made to the prosecutors in the latest court case involving Gavin Seim.  In addition, I have transcribed the first part of this video which is Gavin’s testimony.  One has to wonder if he had fled with his family in that fancy RV with the radio equipment and drone which his prior supporters had complained were purchased with their donations.

Gavin Seims Video Testimony Justifying His Refusal to Respect His Court Date

The video begins with Gavin Seim  sitting in a vehicle, explaining, “My family is at risk.  They are threatened, they’re in peril, because of the treasonous officers of this nation of Blue Isis of Grant County, Washington.  The treasonous judges, the treasonous prosecutors who have no concept of law, nor do they care about law, they only care about winning. And so I didn’t go to court today.  Huhhh…number one, because I am in real danger from these insane mentally ill psychopaths who use people with guns held to our head and then say, We are the Law, but it’s more than that guys, we have to stop recognizing these people, we have to stop acting like they’re saying we have to stop pretending that people need to argue for their rights.”

 “Your rights are inherent, they belong to you and any judge or official that seeks to violate them should themselves be charged; in fact, prosecutors Mark Fedorak and Garth Dano and the judge and the officers, they have committed multiple felonies not simply under the Constitution but under Federal statutes as 18 USC 241 and 242.  They have conspired maliciously to hurt those that they want to silence.  They have conspired to lie, to perjure, and to make, to commit crimes from what we’re seeing in these reports…”  (scene changes from car to a backyard type of scene).

“It’s not freedom, it’s not justice, it’s not OK and it’s time to say, No More.”   (shows photo of man cutting fruit in Mexico while music is playing in the background.  Photo changes to children drinking from a coconut, to a scene with tropical birds in a cage, to a photo of a jar of salsa extra piquante, to a photo with a brotherly handshake, then a photo of a Mexican woman making tortillas…).

A friendly handshake with a Mexican border guard makes him feel welcome. Gavin Seim cannot understand that Mexico is interested in him as a tourist who might spend some money, rather than the person he envisions himself to be;  a self-proclaimed  Man of Honor who is justifiably  fleeing his day of reckoning in a Washington state county courtroom.

“Somewhere warm, somewhere nice, somewhere away from Officer Pat Camp… arrests me for filming him and calling him a crook.  He then steals my phone, which has the only evidence of the fact that I committed no crime whatsoever.  I’m taken to jail and my family has to pay $2,000 to get me out then I’m taken before a Grant County judge and despite their being zero evidence of a crime and her zero ability to articulate probable cause, allows the charges to continue…” (black screen, then a kitchen and heading south on a road trip to Mexico).

Gavin Seim thinks that Americans are being prevented from leaving!! Isn’t it the other way around that America has a problem with illegal immigrants who are entering this nation, so as to better their economic situation?  Gavin Seim makes an absurd declaration, while at the same time observing a fact which refutes his prejudices.   Perhaps “it was unmanned” as someone did not want to hinder Seim from leaving America the Beautiful.

“…are heading south when we Men of Honor do not simply let other people be abused.  Men of honor also don’t sit idly by (America the Beautiful music in background) while their families are taken away, their lives taken away, for No Just Cause.  Men of Honor do not need to pretend that the orders of tyrant fascist mentally ill psychopaths need to be followed.  I’m really annoyed about going on a long road trip without all my medicinals.   I mean this is like the best, the best collection of medicinals probably on this side of the state.” 

 

Lamenting that on his flight from Washington State to Mexico to avoid a court date, that he has not room for all of his medicinal herbs

“Hey you guys, are you ready to go on a little trip?” (the cutest little children are seen jumping in glee, “Yeah!!!”)

“…We’re down here taking a winter road trip away from the cold of the north and Washington and the cold of blue terror and, and abusers that think that to speak the truth is something you should be locked in a cage for as soon as I crossed over even though we’ve still had to file papers and go through stuff nothing, you guys, don’t, I don’t think Americans realize we don’t even let people from Mexico just come and visit, we charge them exorbitant amounts of money, there’s drawings, there’s  lawyers.”

“Now don’t get me wrong, -this place isn’t perfect and I know that’s gonna come out as we visit down here, but uh, the demeanor even, even just coming across the border it was like they treated you like you, they were glad to have you, right? Not like a psychopathic border checkpoint agent who if you twitch wrong is gonna shoot you, OK?  Our border patrol, our, our police, these people are, are insane psychopaths.  You guys and we won’t win on their turf and that’s why I needed to get our retreat and here is the thing, we’re (scene change) not here to hide out.  We’re here to change the narrative.”

Gavin Seim refuses to envision anyone who represents American governmental authority as a reasonable human being,  just trying to do a difficult job.

“We’re here to speak up for the rights of our people and for the rights of all people everywhere and we cannot effectively do that from inside the walls of a for-profit political prison.  I for one refuse to lie down and live as a slave and I will not comply with fascism. (words on screen saying, to be continued).”

 

Rudy Davis Threatens the Prosecutors of  patriot lawbreakers with the Sevenfold Vengeance of God

From this point in this video, at about the 6.50 mark, is heard a recorded message from Rudy Davis to the prosecutors of the court case against Gavin Seim in Grant county,  Washington state. Seim has listed the office phone number of these county prosecutors, encouraging his followers to call on his behalf. Rudy Davis, who was a staunch defender of Kent Hovind during his tax trials, and has stood behind numerous others who are deemed to be “political prisoners”, now takes up the cause of Gavin Seim.

Rudy Davis standing with Dave (Coach) Daubenmire outside the courtroom in Pensacola, FL. They had gathered there in 2015 in support of Kent Hovind,  who was on trial.

As I understand it, Rudy Davis has been ordained as a Christian minister in order to facilitate his ministry to  “political prisoners”.  When it came to the Kent Hovind case, Rudy Davis also found support from the Christian Alternative News Media; in particular Dave Daubenmire, Steve Quayle, Douglas Hagmann, Sheila Zilinksky, Alex Jones and others. Thus we find that those with the highest public profiles in the Alternative press have glossed over the criminal and civil lawbreaking of the patriot movement, whether they be Constitutionalists or Sovereign Citizens, and given them an image makeover as political and Christian martyrs, who nobly defend American freedoms and liberty from government tyranny.

The Transcription of the phone call of Rudy Davis, found at Robert Baty’s website

“My name is Rudy Davis.  I live in Forney, Texas. This call is also being recorded by me for the exposure of evildoers and government.  I was hoping to leave a message.  I believe his name is prosecutor Mark who has unethically and illegally targeted Gavin Seim, a patriot who is putting out a message of liberty and freedom based on biblical foundation.”

“I certainly do not approve of what you’re doing and I pray that God Almighty brings his wrath upon you for what you’re doing.  You and people like you have targeted Schaeffer Cox.  You’ve targeted Jeffrey Weinhaus.  You’ve targeted Bryce Matthew Cuellar.  You’ve targeted Ed and Elaine Brown.  You’ve targeted Russell Landers.  And the list goes on including Schyler Barbeau and the Bundys.”

“And so I want you to know that people are watching what you’re doing, and if I were you, I would be ashamed of your actions and running yet another patriotic family out of this country, so that they feel they have to be safer in Mexico than the United States of America.  I consider you an incredible evildoer working for the minions of Satan, and the New World Order, and I pray death and destruction upon you and everything you’re trying to do as far as coming against patriots in this country. You don’t have to worry about individuals picking up arms.  You have to worry about the wrath of God Almighty who intervenes in the affairs of men through our prayers.”

“And so what you’re doing to Gavin Seim is absolutely horrific and it will be exposed, and I pray that you are held accountable and you get sent to prison just like so many patriots are sitting in prison today; that you receive sevenfold what you’re doing to innocent patriots throughout this country.”

“You are part of the problem. You are not part of the solution.  You are not Batman saving Gotham City from, you know, townsfolk who need to be protected from the likes of Gavim Seim.  Gavin Seim is not a threat to anybody.  Gavin Seim promotes a message of liberty and freedom, and you sir are no ethical representation for any sort of authority whatsoever. You are a scumbag reprobate on a fast train to hell.” (Rudy Davis-Broadcast November 29, 2017).

Tracking the Leopard Meroz Commentary on the Prayer of Rudy Davis

Gavin Seim has all the appearance of being an affectionate husband and father, as well as being part of a close-knit family with his own father and siblings who share the same political activist patriotism, involving publicity oriented  confrontations with law enforcement. Based on the internet videos of these “confrontations”,  Seim’s most recent complaint that he has been forced to flee to Mexico because his family is at risk, threatened,  and in peril, is theatrical nonsense.

When I took a look at some of the facts of the criminal cases of the other prisoners which Rudy Davis champions, and pondered their mugshots,  Gavin Seim appears to be one of the least dangerous.  However, even an annoying mosquito can carry a fatal disease, and initially it seems, government authorities have responded to his buzzing around the court room, by reminding him that they hold the fly swatter.  Upon fleeing his most recent court date under the cover that the real problem is that government authorities are treasonous, mentally ill psychopaths, we discover that the more manly Rudy Davis has arrived at the front lines with a drawn sword, upholding the virtues of cowardice which Gavin Seim so amply displays.

The greater question in this Tracking the Leopard Meroz post, has to do with the Biblical foundation for the imprecatory prayer of Rudy Davis.  Not only did he curse the prosecutors involved in the Gavin Seim case, but he mentioned various prosecutors from different jurisdictions, who had brought about the criminal convictions of other patriots, who are unrelated to the present issue at hand.

Interestingly, in trying to stand up for Gavin Seim, Davis reveals that he knows nothing of the details of this case.  For example, he says, “I believe his name is prosecutor Mark”. This flippant lack of respect shows that Davis has no real concern for this matter.  The last name of Mark is “Fodorak”, by the way.   I am not even sure that Rudy Davis even knows much about Gavin Seim, because his description of him as “a patriot who is putting out a message of liberty and freedom based on biblical foundation” is not an accurate representation of the facts. Biblical foundation?  How so?

No one has run Gavin Seim out of this country.  Gavin Seim appears to be afraid of his own shadow, now that the adrenaline thrill of challenging the police and the judge has worn off. The very fact that he would involve his own wife in his flight from the consequences of his actions shows a disturbing lack of spiritual headship.  It appears that they have three very young children, who in their innocence are enjoying their Mexican vacation, unknowing that their own father, who they look up to,  is afraid to face his court date as an adult man.

The prayer of Rudy Davis, while not said in the name of Jesus Christ in this phone message, calls upon God to render destruction on adversaries which both he and Seim have treated with disrespect and slanderous accusations. The form of Davis’ imprecatory prayer includes God displaying his wrath against certain persons to bring about their death and destruction, and to receive a “sevenfold” return blow for their actions against so-called “innocent” patriots.

Imprecatory prayers, as documented in the Psalms, have long bothered many persons  because of their extremity. This form of prayer, however,  is a legitimate form of righteous judgment in certain very difficult circumstances.  As a result of the misuse of this form of prayer, Jesus Christ  emphatically stated in Matthew 5:44But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.

One of the principles of the Bible, in both the Old and the New Testaments has to do with the fact that God is no respecter of persons; therefore when judging others, the person doing the  judging needs to be impartial, and to take an honest looks at the facts of the case. Deuteronomy 19:16-19 says, If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong; then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the LORD, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days; and the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother; then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put away the evil from among you.

There is great danger from on high to an accuser who disregards the true facts of a case and misapplies the law, because of their respect of persons.  Even in the world of black magicians, the return blow upon the speaker of an unjust prayer is something which they fear.  So it is troubling to hear of a Christian ordained minister lightly handling these deep and serious matters, because of a disregard for the whole counsel of God.

Rudy Davis uses the phrase the wrath of God in his imprecatory prayer, while at the same time ignoring the statement of Romans 1:18-19For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shown it unto them. Holding the truth in unrighteousness, means that a person actually knows what the truth really is, yet because of his unrighteous motives, perverts the very essence of justice and judgment, which is truth itself.

When the patriot movement claims that their beliefs have a Biblical foundation, Isaiah 28:16-17 echoes back,  Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.  Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.

The foundation stone for judgment and righteousness is Jesus Christ himself, and from hence all justice and judgment is measured.   Rudy Davis never even acknowledged the name above all names in his threatening phone call.  Love your enemies?  Perhaps Rudy Davis considers that a  sevenfold curse of death and destruction are a more dramatic publicity stunt, than the quiet acknowledging of the facts in these patriot cases.

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Peter J. Reilly, CPA comments on the Tracking The Leopard Meroz Blog “Hovindology” articles

When I was researching Kent Hovind and his tax troubles, I found that the analysis of the facts of this case had been thoroughly covered by three persons:  Peter J. Reilly, CPA of forbes.com, Robert Baty of kehvrlb.com and Dee Holmes of Hovindology.com.

Lately I have been reviewing their reporting plus the many varied comments made on Baty’s Facebook groups on the ongoing story which centers around Kent Hovind’s former tax issues, personal problems, the religious arguments surrounding the creation/ evolution debates, and his connection to the sovereign citizen legal and tax issues which I find interesting in connection with the Christian Alternative News Media’s anti-government bias.

I feel very honored that Peter J. Reilly,CPA, who has been a contributing writer on taxes to Forbes for over 6 years, has made favorable mention of my Kent Hovind related articles on his personal website, where he features various interesting tax related stories. You can read his November 29, 2017 write-up on my articles and background on Your Tax Matters Partner in an article called Hovindology Update. 

 

 

Blistering Blurbs From A Basement Broadcaster: The Day When Douglas “Courtroom Ready” Hagmann Was Visited By A Real Reporter

Alright now this is, this I have to tell you folks, this is an interview I have been waiting for, for a long time.  And just as an aside, the Rolling Stone magazine can kiss my butt,  alright?  I just had to throw that out there.  Those people who know what I’m talking about,  you know what I’m talking about.  I ain’t gonna give them any credit or any…just leave it at that.  A couple of Rolling Stone interview people in here and they turn out a trash piece, but what do you expect?  Douglas Hagmann commenting at the 32.53 mark on the November 22, 2017 Hagmann Report entitled, The Day the Music Died, JFK 54 Years Ago:  St. John Hunt & Pastor Lankford.  

If you were listening to that Doug Hagmann statement, would your curiosity be piqued?  Would you ask, what Rolling Stone interview?  Why does he think it is a trash article? It took place where? When? To answer those questions which Doug Hagmann has refused to address as a gentleman scholar, let’s begin with an audio clip made in April 2017 when those two intrepid reporters came knocking on the door.

Female Reporter: Hi!  Are you Mrs. Hagmann? 
Renee Hagmann:  Yeah, Renee Hagmann. (dogs loudly barking, woof woof, yap, yap yap…)  She won’t bite.
Female Reporter: So we went to his basement studio which is unbelievably decked out; there’s an anchor chair and everything and we asked for the court room ready documents and he said they were at the copiers and that he hadn’t kept a copy.  I mean on the 2nd he made a big declaration..
Doug Hagmann: yeah..
Female Reporter:..to the world
Doug Hagmann: Yes, I did. And that is based on the, I made that based in large part on information I got, received from my sources.
Female Reporter: OK, and you trust them so much you don’t have to go back and like check it with anybody.  You really believe that.
Doug Hagmann: I think that’s a little bit uhh, no, It’s I think that there was enough supporting evidence or supporting documentation on the evidence which was documentation to substantiate the veracity of his assertions…now..
Female Reporter:  What documentation?  We don’t have any!
Doug Hagmann:  OK, if you look at, OK, well that’s true, now, we don’t have any direct…You’re going to hit me, aren’t you?

AND HIT HIM, SHE DID!  Amanda Robb has since published a 13 page, well written and well researched article reflecting investigative journalism at its best,  in the Rolling Stone magazine.

I transcribed the above conversation between reporter Amanda Robb and Douglas J. Hagmann of the Hagmann Report from a 1.13 minute Revealnews.org/podcast. More than 6 months after that interview, on  November 16, 2017, Rollingstone.com published  Amanda Robb’s article entitled, Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal.  This extensive investigative piece is subtitled, Inside the web of conspiracy theorists, Russian operatives, Trump campaigners and Twitter bits who manufactured the ‘news’ that Hillary Clinton ran a pizza-restaurant child-sex ring. Amanda Robb also gives credit to the reporting of  Aaron Sankin, Laura Starecheski, Michael Corey, Jaime Longoria and Jasper Craven as she notes that “this story was reported in partnership with The Investigative Fund and Reveal from the Center for Investigative Reporting.

The Rollingstone article extensively details the explosive take off of the Pizzagate Scandal through the internet by right-wing oriented disinformation sources. I printed off a copy of this article so I could underline points of interest, and what is notable is the number of persons who were interviewed and quoted who have been tracking the effects of both automated and human-hands-on methods of transmitting propaganda throughout social media.  Also Amanda Robb traces the human element of the Pizzagate story, and how that assisted the spread of false and defamatory stories.

Of most interest to the readers of Tracking The Leopard Meroz is the interview of Doug Hagmann.  Rolling Stone writer Amanda Robb explains that “In April, Hagmann agreed to meet with me for a look at his ‘courtroom-ready’ documents on Pizzagate. His split-level home in Erie, Pennsylvania, is on a quiet leafy street.  In the front yard, there’s a small waterfall, a rock garden and a large sign warning that the place is under surveillance.  He greeted me in the foyer wearing a suit and tie, his hair slicked back with Brylcreem, and led the way downstairs to his basement broadcast center.”

Continuing, Robb says, “In October 2016, Hagmann claimed, he ‘communicated’ with a friend who knows someone affiliated with the NYPD.  The friend of the friend had been on the ‘task force’ that secured Weiner’s computer and had copied documents onto a thumb drive ‘proving’ Clinton and her associates were involved in pedophilia. ‘Now, I can’t get him to give me the thumb drive,’ he said. “Or even admit to the fact that he had it.’  When I asked how he knew the files existed, he said, ‘I trust my source’.”

“When I asked if he had verified anything, Hagmann shuffled some papers, lifting one sheet by a corner, like a poker player.  With apparent reluctance, he turned over a color copy of an image showing a clean, uninjured boy wearing a green T-shirt in a dog cage.”  Amanda Robb asks Hagmann what this has to do with Hillary Clinton.  “…the following month, at Awaken to the Shakin’, a Bible conference in Gurnee, Illinois, Hagmann presented his evidence to an audience of about 40 middle-aged churchgoers.  His courtroom-ready exhibits included the Wikipedia entry for ‘fake news’, the New Oxford Dictionary definition of ‘post truth,’ a quote by John Wayne, a photo of people sitting on a couch wearing horse masks, a photo of scars on the fingers of John Podesta.  And the kicker- a photo of a decapitated body that Hagmann said was a victim of serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer and another of a sculpture by Louise Bourgeois in Tony Podesta’s home, ironically titled ‘The Arch of Hysteria.’  The two images, he said, are shockingly similar.”

So what impact did Douglas Hagmann have with his “courtroom ready” fake news story across the internet?  Amanda Robb states, “It was Hagmann who-four days after Carmen Katz first posted the story and six days before Election Day- brought Pizzagate from social media to fake news’ largest stage.  On the November 2nd broadcast of Infowars, arguably the most influential conspiracy-theory outlet in the country, with 7.7 million unique visitors to its website a month, Alex Jones asked Hagmann to tell his audience what sources had revealed about the emails recovered on Weiner’s computer. “(T)he most disgusting aspect of this is the sexual angle,” Hagmann said.  “I don’t want to be graphic or gross here….Based on my source, Hillary did in fact participate on some of the junkets on the Lolita Express.”

Amanda Robb adds, “The story took off.  Google Trends measures interest in topics among the 1.17 billion users of its search engine on a 0-100 scale.  On October 29th, the day Katz posted the story on Facebook, searches for “Hillary” and “pedophile” ranked zero.  Ninety-six hours later, when Hagmann “broke” the story on InfoWars, they scored 100.”

The higher the numbers of viewers, the greater the monetary rewards; the higher the amount of filthy lucre, the greater the guilt of the one who profited from bearing false witness

I find it interesting that the information by Rolling Stone that Alex Jones receives about 7.7 million unique visitors to its website a month. Recently, I was listening to the Doug Hagmann Radio Show which airs in the morning, and at the 25.32 mark of the November 14, 2017 broadcast, Criminality of the Communist Progressives & Censorship of the Truth Seekers”, Hagmann states, “We’ve got a pretty formidable footprint in the Alternative Media…our program reaches I don’t know-downloads last year on just one platform alone, 70 some million downloads uh 100 some countries.  I don’t know, we’re heard all over the world.” It is difficult to compare Hagmann’s numbers with those of Alex Jones as it does not appear that he is discussing unique viewers, but rather the number of views. However, 70 million a year downloads is 5.8 million a month, and that is an impressive statistic.

Hagmann reverses his opinion of secret sources

I have long questioned the veracity of Doug Hagmann’s sources, and especially those who have hidden their true identity behind a pseudonym, so I was interested in the self serving commentary of Hagmann just one day before the Rolling Stone article was published. Recall that Amanda Robb had asked to see his courtroom ready documentation on Pizzagate which he had received from sources which he does not name, and he also failed to prove that his documentation even exists, by claiming that it was at the copier’s. Here is what Hagmann had to say about another form of hidden sources; those who hide their identity behind a pseudonym.

On the November 15, 2017 Doug Hagmann Show called News, Clues and Hints, at the 28.22 mark the topic of the recent internet sensation called Q is remarked upon.  “…my whole gut instinct about this, is that we are being gamed.  Now does that make the information that is being, um, posted by Q any less real or whatever,– or I just guess briefly what I’m talking about that is, there is an anonymous character, anonymous individual, or anonymous entity who is referenced just simply by the letter Q who has posted a series numerous times, a series of questions of statements, really one-liners if you will, about uh what’s really currently taking place.  And it’s almost like this mental jigsaw puzzle with these supposed clues about what’s really going on.  And the lot, I mean we’re talking a lot, and I mean tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of people involved in attempting to decipher what Q meant.”

Hagmann continues, “Well my whole idea is very simple, with respect to this:  If you have information specific to a certain topic or a crime or activity just come out and say it and identify yourself as you say it. Um, if you noticed in our flagship program, we have not, and we will not any longer allow anyone on our program who does not identify themselves or let me clarify this, we have to know their full identity to us and the only way someone is getting on our program using a pseudonym or not being named with their full name so everyone can know who they are-the only way they’re….the only way we’ll bring someone like that on is if there is a legitimate, and by legitimate, I’m talking about an individual who is going to be testifying before Congress, or testifying in a jury trial or trial situations that has information relevant to current events.  So in other words, we will grant anonymity only if it’s truly legitimate and will be spelled out before they appear on our program and that’s just standard operating procedure now.”

“So I have kind of a problem with the way the information by this anonymous individual is being thrown out there” Douglas Hagmann explains, “because if you really look at all of the information, and again, if you don’t know what I’m talking about, don’t worry about it.  But if you look at all of the statements, questions, partial statements, the one liners, it’s almost it, it could be the byproduct or the direct product of someone’s own analysis of open sourced data, so I’m not, I’m not super-impressed, uh I’m not even impressed.  I’m somewhat underwhelmed, I suppose, but I’m watching it none the less…”.

Well, Douglas Hagmann, I have a problem with the exception you allow in your new pseudonym policy.  Remember your interview with Rebekah Roth, who claimed to have real documentation which she would not reveal, yet wanted to sell her fictional books so that we might all guess what that evidence might be?  She claimed that someone of high import wanted her to testify before Congress. So under your new policy, would she be exempt from your pseudonym policy? Why have any exceptions at all?

One last quote from the Rolling Stone story, Anatomy of A Fake News Scandal, ” As Harvard’s Benkler puts it, ‘The right-wing-media ecosystem had become so hyperpartisan, so self-referential and so superinsular it often simply ignored information that’s disconfirming.’ ” Ignored information that’s disconfirming.  That sums up Doug Hagmann’s approach to truth telling, especially when it comes to the part he has played in spreading false information on the internet.

 

 

FYI: Robert David Steele lawsuit: Filed 11/20/2017 Plaintiff’s Memorandum In Opposition to Negron’s Motion To Dismiss

rds lawsuit 1120 2017

Click on the above link to read Plaintiff’s Memorandum In Opposition To Defendant, Patricia A. Negron’s Rule 12(b) (6) Motion to Dismiss.

Of interest is that Robert David Steele argues that he is not a public figure.  Also note the use of the word co-conspirator.  It is argued that Negron is responsible for Goodman and Queen Tut’s defamation, as well as her own words.

 

ROBERT DAVID STEELE & His List of Crowdstalkers and Co-conspirators: Is Your Name On This List?

For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged:  and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.  Matthew 7:2

On September 1, 2017 a $15,500,000 lawsuit for defamation was filed in the U. S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia-(Richmond), by attorney Steven Scott Biss, on behalf of plaintiffs Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network against three defendants,  Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron and Queen Tut a woman believed to be known as Carla A. Howell. 

Yesterday I used my PACER account to look at the court docket of this lawsuit and noticed that a summons had been served on Susan A. Lutzke of Fort Collins, Colorado, who is now known to Crowdsource The Truth viewers as Jason Goodman’s repeat guest, Queen Tut. Because of this identity change of one of the defendants, I then wanted to know if Robert David Steele had effectively cleared the public record of his false accusations that Carla A. Howell, who is connected to the Libertarian Party, had defamed and injured his reputation under the internet handle, Queen Tut.  I see that Howell’s name still appears on the lawsuit.  Will Ms. Howell now sue Mr. Steele using the exact charges that he accused her with?

One has to wonder if Steele had long considered Carla A. Howell to be his personal adversary since he had been so hasty to accuse her of slandering him under a pseudonym. This is a reasonable question given that he has stated that he is  composing an enemies list of those who disagree with him, which he desires to add to his lawsuit.

When I entered Susan A. Lutzke’s name into a search engine, not much came up, except two internet posts of note. The first is a screenshot of a Twitter message which declares that Queen Tut is Susan A. Lutzke, and gives one of her addresses of record.

The second reference to her name is found in this article written by Robert David Steele on November 8, 2017 called #GoogleGestapo -Censorship and Crowdstalking Made Easy:  How The Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics. This article only states, “…and ‘Queen Tut’ now known to be Susan Lutzky(sp).”  I reviewed this lengthy article which Medium.com says takes 37 minutes to read, and have a few comments to make on the content. I have put Robert David Steele’s words in black and my comments in maroon.

**********************************************************************************

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” (John 8:32)

It is a common writer’s device to showcase a quotation at the beginning of an article which embodies an underlying principle of the topic.  In today’s post I have begun with a quote from Matthew 7:2, For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

Robert David Steele begins his article with a quote from the Bible also; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. This is a quote used by many persons, even atheists.  But this is but the second half of a sentence spoken, and when you quote the entire words, the meaning is altered from a general “truth” to God’s truth as spoken.  The entire sentence should read (John 8:31-32) Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then ye be disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

You see, by only quoting half a sentence, Steele has altered the meaning of the word truth, as it is defined by the actual speaker of that sentence. Now why would he do that? I suppose that he wants you to think that he is interested in truth, even while he is in the act of lying about how the word truth is used in its actual context.

Steele likes to  complain that he is misunderstood because his critics have not read his Amazon.com book reviews which he claims contains great knowledge. Recently, I had spent several days reading a broad sample of his book reviews, as my intent is to be as impartial as possible.   One of those book reviews I read by Steele was on Christ’s Ventriloquists:  The Event that Created Christianity by Eric Zuesse.  Steele titles his review, Christianity is Fraud Subordinated to Empire, New Testament Written By Enemies of Jesus & Judaism. He walks in agreement with the unbelieving Jewish author, Zuesse, that throughout history,  God was powerless to preserve his own words in writing.

This is a speculative account based on personal experience and broad reading.  In no way is it a substitute for a proper legal discovery process-but it could be useful in guiding such a process.

This is the first sentence of the actual essay, after the lead quotation from the Bible on Truth.  Steele hedges his words by saying his thoughts are opinion, i.e. speculative, and we see that he has a goal in mind in revealing his words.  That goal has to do with a lawsuit where he is Plaintiff extraordinaire. He thinks it would be a good thing if Roger Stone, representing an Alt-Right white male would team up with an Alt-Left black female who goes by the handle Charlie Peach, and which he implies, by innuendo, might be Cynthia McKinney…to do what? He wants them to jointly sue Twitter.

If Roger Stone and “Charlie Peach” were to sue Twitter together, in combination with my own lawsuit against three apparatchiks and their many co-conspirators, and the new potentially formidable case by Prager University against Google, You Tube, and DOES 1-25, I believe these three cases and perhaps others might converge in a most constructive manner assuredly in the public interest.  The above juxtaposition is important-the Deep State is seeking to censor and in some cases digitally assassinate both those on the right and those on the left who challenge official narratives.  This is discrimination based on political affiliation or belief.

In previous articles I have noted his lust to sue just about anyone who does not properly admire his achievements.  One of those high points of his life is his claim to having once headed up a CIA false flag operation in South America.  By boasting of this, Robert David Steele is saying in essence that he is without a conscious whatsoever about committing criminals acts in which someone else is framed. Right now, he has retired from his CIA and government military contractor hey-days, and he wants to be a tax exempt change agent for the Presidential election process.  It appears his favorite method of change is the Federal Civil Lawsuit so that he can FORCE the legal discovery process to reveal hidden facts which he can use for his preplanned purposes. 

Below is a partial listing of specific trolls for whom I have in hand copies of defamatory statements suitable for submission to a Court, for YouTube only.  I have another list and copies of defamatory statements for Facebook.  Every single one of these individuals is discoverable in true name via legal discovery, and can be held to account as a crowdstalker and co-conspirator.(I have made 2 screenshots representing the You Tubers, below):

Is your name or internet handle on this list of 247 persons which Robert David Steele is accusing of being a crowdstalker and co-conspirator?  If so, he wants to add you to his list of defendants who he is accusing of defamation in a Federal lawsuit.  I will only note one name as it is well known…that of Omegashock, #161 on the list.  John Little has a blog named Omegashock and he is pro-Israel, so I assume that is his “crime”.    However, whenever I have read his blog and how he discusses the issues with his readers, he is always a gentleman. 

I recognize a few other handles by virtue of having read their comments on some videos which I have viewed. Once I observed, Robert David Steal, #183 commenting on Crowdsource The Truth, during live streaming.  Robert David Steal is hilarious, but one time when I was laughing at his comments, he went over the line, and Jason Goodman, #91 on the above list and one of the defendants in Steele’s lawsuit,  shut him down.  So how could anyone accuse those two of being co-conspirators?

In my direct personal experience, these troll armies are very capable at persistent pervasive crowd-stalking.  Every YouTube channel I have appeared on has been attacked (not just current, but past), to the point that most of my hosts have been forced to disable all comments, depriving the honest viewers of the interaction that I take pains to provide when not being crowd-stalked..  Many hosts have not invited me to return, perhaps influenced by the demonetization (“shadow banning”) of any interview with me rather than the substance of my work that led to my being recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize in January 2017….[Under the subtitle, Media “Hit Jobs” On Demand]…During a two-hour interview with Alex Jones…in answer to a caller who in retrospect may have been setting me up, did I address children sent into space on “20 year and out missions” to leverage growth while in transit; and an existing colony on Mars, established fifteen years ago, with 10,000 people there now.  The Daily Beast conflated these three completely separate factual concepts to discredit me.

The troll army accusation follows the list of persons which Steele wants to bring into his lawsuit as co-conspirators with the defendants Goodman, Negron and Queen Tut.    Then he launches into other problems he has had with his reputation, including his  belief that there is a colony of persons on Mars which have been living there for the past fifteen years. Robert David Steele thinks that his nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize should override any other perceptions that the public may have that he is a kook, one whose credibility hinges on his strange Hall Of Fame status on Amazon.com as a book reviewer.

As someone who has managed a false flag operation for the CIA, and who is a top published author on the topics of deep state, false flag operations, pedophilia, and fake news (and rarely but sometimes about the holocaust and Zionist subversion), I speculate that my non-profit educational website is triggering just about every flagword on the Deep State/Zionist watchlist–a watchlist that is “Top Secret” and not subject to any form of Congressional or judicial oversight….All Paths Lead to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)…

Robert David Steele never takes personal responsibility for his own reckless words and actions, or how they are seldom backed up by facts and evidence which are relevant to the assertions he publishes. 

Now in this article Robert David Steele says that his opinions are speculative.  I find it interesting that the document recently filed in his lawsuit, entitled, Defendant Patricia A. Negron’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion To Dismiss the Complaint, has this statement, “A complaint must be dismissed if it does not allege “enough facts to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.” Bell Atl. v. Twombly, 550 U. S. 544,570 (2007).  The plaintiff’s “[f]actual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.”

Under Argument, we find this, “To state a claim for defamation, the Plaintiffs must show (1) publication, (2) an actionable statement, and (3) the requisite intent…Words that are “merely offensive or unpleasant statement” are not defamatory. Id. To be defamatory, the words must make the plaintiff appear “odious, infamous, or ridiculous.”

And therein lies the problem:  it is Robert David Steele’s own words that make him appear odious, infamous, and ridiculous.  Robert David Steele ought to be suing himself.

 

John Little of Omegashock has answered RDS in his November 17, 2017 post.  To read it scroll past his main article until you reach the link to the Meroz article.

 

 

 

FYI: Robert David Steele lawsuit update on Patricia Negron

November 8, 2017 Defendant Patricia A. Negron’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss The Complaint    (click on pdf link below)

earth intelligence networks negron motion to dismiss

Also of interest is that a certificate of service shows that Queen Tut’s legal name is Susan A. Lutzke of Fort Collins, Colorado

After Carefully Considering the List of “My Mommy Told Me I Could Be Anything I Want To Be” Career Options ….. Glen Stoll Chose To Become A Sovereign Citizen Mastermind of Illegal Tax Schemes

Glenn Stoll, tax advisor to Kent Hovind and other “ministries” bent on ruling the earth as Sovereign Citizens. Only those who are true prophets could have foreseen that many of his clients would be jailed for tax fraud.

In the previous post, I brought up the example of how Jesus Christ got to the heart of the motive of those who question legitimate authority, merely by posing one question that had two possible answers.  His challengers tried to hide their true intentions  by the evasive answer, We cannot tell. In this post, we are going to come down from the Kingdom of God higher court level to that earthly magistrate which has been granted the last word on this ball of dirt which we live.  No, I am not talking about Death, or even Your Wife, but the Tax Judge.

Just as Jesus Christ, by a simple test, reveals the heart of the rebel against God, we discover that the highest tax court has also devised a test of willfulness to separate out the criminal tax violators from the rest of us, who are surrounded by a fog of confusion every April 15th.

Those who thoughtfully consider how to fairly apply tax laws are silenced by the reporting bias of the Christian Alternative Media 

In 1992 Dwight W. Stone II, published in the Maryland Law Review, Volume 51, Issue 1, Article 8 a lengthy discussion titled,  Cheek v. United States:  Finally, a Precise Definition of the Willfulness Requirement in Federal Tax Crimes.  The author, in his Introduction, says, “By reversing the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which had upheld the trial court’s use of the objective reasonableness standard, the Court finally laid to rest a persistently troublesome problem of statutory construction: how to interpret the word “willfully” in the context of the tax crimes statutes.

Stone later remarks, “In United States v. Bishop, the Court attempted to define willfulness more precisely when it held that the ‘bad purpose’ or ‘evil motive’ of Murdock referred to ‘a voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty’,” adding that Congress’s intent in including the willfulness requirement was to “construct penalties that separate the purposeful tax violator from the well-meaning, but easily confused, mass of taxpayers.”

What that meant is that the Court was interested in separating out those who violate tax codes, by motive.  Thus when on February 15, 2005 Glen Stoll was issued a “complaint for permanent injunction and other equitable relief” in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle,  his motives were being tested, and this makes for interesting reading.

Speaking of motives, one of the questions which arose in my mind when reading the above legal complaint,  has to do with that unified group of radio hosts in the Alternative Media who came out as Champions for Kent Hovind.  By virtue of their public excusing of the criminal acts involved, it would seem that they became spiritual partakers in the sins of not only Kent Hovind, but of his tax advisor, Glen Stoll, as well.  

So just how far down does the Christian Alternative Media’s roots sink into the soil of the Sovereign Citizen Movement? I suppose the answer has to do with how low did Glenn Stoll go, when he created  fraudulent law and tax scheme businesses to profit off of that vast consumer base of Christian Imposters who think gain is godliness.

The Trap is set for the Christian who gives his passive consent to a clichéd view of the world, making them Partakers of Other Men’s Sins

Glen Stoll who never passed the lawyer’s bar exam in any state, thought at one point that by setting up the Arlington Law School that he could grant YOU a law degree for “passing” his courses.  He successfully got Kent Hovind to pass another sort of Bars exam which got him a 10 year prison sentence for tax fraud.

“Ahhh, so what?” you say, as you declare your allegiance to your favorite Christian Alternative Media star, “how does this affect me?” The answer is “a lot” if their constant use of rhetorical devices over the years has remolded you from being a salt of the earth, hard-working, family loving, tax paying Christian into a cliché driven, non-critical thinking adversary of legitimate governmental authority. Consider  one example of the rhetoric of Dave Hodges of the Commonsense Show, who wrote on January 22, 2013, Are You A Sovereign Citizen? 

The very first sentence of Dave Hodges’ article is his thesis statement: Government never stop(sp) trying to find ways to cast legitimate dissenters in a negative light. From there,  Hodges equates “Government” with the globalists, and he proceeds to go from  general examples to the specific case of a woman named Stacy Lynne, who Hodges claims had her son taken from her in retaliation for her anti-Agenda 21 efforts, in connection with the “ICLEI invasion of Fort Collins, Colorado”.  I am not going to discuss the features of this case, except to observe that Hodges uses this example as applying to a person who was labeled as being a Sovereign Citizen.  Dave Hodges said he was confused by that designation until he read a police magazine and realized that the new domestic terrorist is the sovereign citizen. 

In this article Hodges creates a stark contrast between the evil intentioned corporate-controlled media who had “brought attention to a secretive and dangerous subculture which believes American laws don’t apply to them” and that of the alternative, and truthful media representing the “legitimate dissenters”, which would include the author and his circle of radio host friends.   Throughout this article Dave Hodges uses emotionally charged clichés to label broad groups of individuals, and pits them against each other. The effect is to lead his readers down the path of the non-thinker who never can grasp the complex reality of how things are actually done by those who are charged with enforcing the laws of our land.

Dave Hodges concludes, “One would be wise to avoid being labeled with the new domestic terrorist term, sovereign citizen.  Carried out to its extreme, as in the case of Stacy Lynne, a sovereign citizen is not something that something that one wants to be labeled as the term is bootstrapping all legitimate concerns about the government and virtually criminalizing dissent and protest.”

I agree that it is not wise to be part of the Sovereign Citizen Movement.  However, if you go back over Dave Hodges first sentence and look at the progression of his arguments which ignore the factual basis of the sovereign citizen movement’s criminal actions which government authorities have been faced with, and you understand that Dave Hodges views legitimate and lawful government agents as nothing more than globalists, his final statement is deceptive.  Dave Hodges represents that double minded logical reasoning that one can hide your true motives, if only you are known by the right labels.  Thus one who shows by his actions that he is a sovereign citizen in principle, is advised to not allow anyone to label them as such.

Rather than “freeing America one enslaved mind at a time”, Dave Hodges serves as a change agent for replacing legitimate and lawful governmental authority with a State of Confusion. If you call yourself a Christian, and you spout a bunch of religious lingo,  yet your de facto views are those of a sovereign citizen who willfully misuses legal language, you are at heart an anarchist.

Going back to the Dwight Stone article I quoted in the beginning, those tax court judges who debated the test which would prove specific intent defined the required evil motive as being the “voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty.” And here is where someone like Glen Stoll condemns himself for he claimed to be an expert in the law and then later said he was not an expert, yet his actions betrayed him when he set up the  Arlington Law School.  Stoll revealed his knowledge of tax law by creating illegal tax exemption schemes which circumvented the law.  He also has created problems for himself in misusing the name of Jesus Christ as the authority by which his schemes were based, and by pushing the false pretense that anyone can claim to have a tax exempt Christian ministry.

Hear No Evil gets a Driver’s License from the Embassy of Heaven and was rumored to be hiding out in a school bus on Glen Stoll property in Alabama

Speaking of the State of Confusion, I discovered a driver’s license for our friend, Hear No Evil,  which appears to have originated from that sovereign citizen group called the Embassy of Heaven.  Glen Stoll is affiliated with this group and had in the past had his clients make use of the EOH’s  issuance of false legal documents, to supplement his  corporation sole and ministerial trust agreements.

Sovereign Citizens create their own driver’s licenses

According to the Embassy of Heaven, who claims to represent God’s Government on Earth, in the Spring of 1993, the Secret Service conducted a “secret investigation of the Embassy of Heaven Church.  Two men, posing as potential members, visited the Church, purchased some of our materials, and chatted with Paul Revere, the pastor.”

Paul Revere, did your mother really name you that?  Of course not!  Apparently he did not like the birth name which his parents gave him which was Craig Douglas Fleshman. But as a so-called Christian pastor who is to proclaim the truth, he thought it best to do so using a false name.  How this computer systems analyst living in Oregon got into issuing false driver’s licenses and the like, I have no idea.

Paul Revere Rides Once Again with The Sovereign Citizens Making Their Last Stand

It is interesting that more corporation soles had been issued in Washington and Nevada than in any of the other states. Pastor Paul Revere’s Washington state business associate Glen Stoll, and his former friends John and Candice Sinclair, who were defendants in a similar tax fraud lawsuit, are the most likely causes of that statistical anomaly.  As for Nevada, the Bundy’s and their friends who also enjoy pondering sovereign citizen legal concepts, had moved their standoff from their home base to reappear in early 2016 in the forests of Oregon. One of those involved in that fiasco was Pete Santilli, an Alternative News Radio host who in 2015 heeded the call to defend that tax fraud Kent Hovind, forcing me to add him to my growing list of the Champions of Kent Hovind.

In the 1993 letter sent to the U. S. Secret Service from Pastor Paul Revere, he had declared,  “We are authorized by Jesus Christ to maintain a system of records for the Kingdom of Heaven.  We issue driving and vehicle documents as evidence of our authorization to use the Kingdom of Heaven Highways. We do not grant the state or federal governments permission to arrest our citizens, issue citations, seize vehicles or confiscate documents.  If any state or federal agency has a complaint against one of our citizens, they need to file a complaint with our office and we will investigate, and if necessary, set a hearing.”

This 7 acres was zoned for agricultural purposes, so when Glen Stoll’s group set down a shipping container, a school bus with several persons living in it, and started building several small structures without first getting a building permit…the county authorities started asking questions.

Uh huh….well, I believe I have tracked  Hear No Evil through his fake driver’s license to Bay Minette,  Alabama where it seems he was found sleeping in a shipping container or school bus on 7 acres which Glen Stoll had acquired.  In an article by Craig Myers dated January 20, 2010, Judge ties controversial Baldwin County Landowners to Tax Evasion Scheme, it appears that the locals were somewhat startled to find that the person who failed to get a building permit for several small structures was none other than The Family Defense League of Edmonds, WA, the precursor of Glen Stoll’s Remedies At Law

When contacted, Glen Stoll reassured the caller that the federal lawsuit wasn’t legitimate, and he hadn’t broken any laws. “There is not even the slightest hint of truth to any such accusation.  I’ve never been convicted or formally accused of any such thing,” Stoll said in a telephone interview.  There was never a hearing, a notice of hearing, no due process…An attorney stuck a piece of paper in front of a judge and got him to sign it.  We do traditional church ministry–evangelism, worship, helping the poor and needy.”

Craig Myers, the author of this article explains this gap theory of Glen Stoll’s recollection of events by stating, “In June 2005, U. S. District Judge Ricardo S. Martinex issued a default judgment and permanent injunction, ordering Stoll to stop ‘any conduct that interferes with the administration and enforcement of the internal revenue laws’.”  Glenn Stoll  has finely honed the art of willful ignorance, that art of sophistry which Sovereign Citizens have mastered to the extent that even the best of Jewish Talmudic lawyers would be confounded. 

Glenn Stoll is accused of being frozen in fear and hiding out, in order to avoid  having to answer his clients who end up in jail.

On July 12, 2011,  Paul John:  Hansen published   Glen Stoll Abandons Trust Responsibility, Kent Hovinda June 29, 2011 open letter from Kent Hovend to Glen Stoll of Remedies At Law. As you may have observed, in the middle of Paul John Hansen’s name is a colon.  This strange use of punctuation signifies, like a gang hand gesture,  that certain concepts of the Sovereign Citizen Movement are in play. Like some sort of amulet of protection,  Hansen also used the double parenthesis in this request, [[Send me your dealings (story) with Glen Stoll and I’ll  expose his breach of contracts here.]]

In this open letter, Kent Hovind begins, “Dear Glen, It is with great sadness that I must write this letter.  I have tried to call you and your secretary scores (hundreds?) of times but neither of you will answer the phone.  Others who are concerned about our ministry have also tried to contact you and their letters, calls, emails and pleas go unanswered by you.”

“I cannot comprehend what you are thinking nor why you would behave this way.  In 2002 our ministry was part of Faith Baptist fellowship under Pastor Richard Mooneyhan.  He was retiring and the Church elected to dissolve.  As founder of Creation Science Evangelism I was concerned with out ministry being “orphaned” and asked God to provide a “man of understanding” (Ezra 5-8) to show us how to be properly structured to please the Lord, be true to His Word and at the same time please the various government entities.  The Bible commands us to, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.”  Rom. 12:18.”

Kent Hovind explaining to Glen Stoll that the IRS has existed since Genesis 1:2 as “the darkness upon the face of the deep” which had become his prison experience

“Within a few days I met you and a few of your associates while I was preaching in the Northwest-Oregon I believe.  We talked for several hours and I felt you had the perfect combination of knowledge of the law, knowledge of the church/state issues and a love for the Lord, I felt my prayer had been answered.  Shortly thereafter you talked with Pastor Mooneyhan, created ministry trusts and the transfer was made.  Since I have a very limited understanding of these issues I was free to continue my calling of traveling and preaching on creation and left the legal issues to you as trustee….Then, when the IRS attacked our ministry in 2006 and I was taken to prison something changed.  When the Assistant US Attorney J. D. Roy Atchison seized the church ministry bank account and operating fund of over $x0,000 you did nothing!  It was like you were frozen with fear.

Kent Hovind then mentions that his CSE ministry had paid Glen Stoll a great deal of money over the years for his work on setting up trusts and for his advice.  He wanted Stoll to resign as trustee of the ministry trusts and to have Stoll’s advisory board appoint Paul Hansen as trustee. Towards the end of this letter, Hovind starts to get tough, saying, “If you do not resign, send Paul the paperwork needed, and step out of the picture I will be forced to take several more steps which will be most unpleasant.  I remain your friend, and Christian brother, and pray you will do right.  Kent Hovind”.

How much does one pay for a tax evasion scheme which will cost you penalties and prison time later?

So, uhhh, like how much money did these poorly constructed legal traps of Glen Stoll cost?  According to the late Karl Bremmer of the Minnesota based website, RippleInStillwater.com, the “ministry” of You Can Run, But You Cannot Hide was promised they could buy what Stoll said were ” ‘established, exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable and assignable ministerial trusts’ that would allow them to operate as a ‘free church’ that would be invulnerable to state regulation and control.  For a fee of $6,500, they were told, Stoll would create three trusts that would give them ‘absolute tax-exempt status,’ eliminate all federal tax return filing requirements, allow donations to the organization to be tax-deductible, and allow the organizations to retain control and enjoyment of all assets of the ministries.  They would also be assigned a trustee to deal with all federal, state and legal systems.”

It is interesting that Glen Stoll’s clients and also the Federal Courts keep bringing up this matter of the ministerial trusts and corporations sole which he had sold in an expensive package.  Because in an October 15, 2005 Affidavit,  the Affiant Glen Stoll acknowledges with his own signature that his 5 page document is ‘true, correct and certain, materially complete, relevant and not misleading”, and he states in point #3, “We at Remedies at Law do not ‘assist customers in creating ministerial trusts’ and we never have.  All we do along those lines is to provide an establishment service for Church organization.  We do not advise anyone to stop paying their taxes, or to stop filing tax returns as required, and we never have.”

If that was the case, what did these clients pay $6500 for? If it wasn’t for those ministerial trusts/ corporation sole documents, was it for a windowless shipping container in which they could hide out from the IRS?

Additionally according to Stoll’s Affidavit,  under points #29 and #30, “As an ecclesiastical and commercial non-union lawyer, I have the experience and ability to provide assistance of Counsel in the areas of civil and religious liberties, maintaining professional integrity, and preserving personal privacy and protection.  Although I have spent considerable time studying law during my professional legal career, beginning with family law in 1988, I do not practice or advise in any area of secular statutory law.  Consequently, it would not be correct to assume that I am an expert in tax laws.”

Glenn Stoll did not pass the bar exam in any state of the United States of America, and he was never licensed to practice law; thus his Arlington Law School  was about as bogus in their promise that one could “obtain a law degree for the professional application and practice of law” as the Patriot Baptist University was when they gave Kent Hovind a certificate granting him a PHD so he could parade around as Dr. Dino. One cannot keep up with the ever changing  lies of these martyrs of the Sovereign Citizens movement who pose as Christians.

The Greater Frauds, which called themselves Greater Ministries International, just happen to have ties to the Embassy of Heaven affiliated with Glen Stoll

Another group which also had ties to the Embassy of Heaven (affiliated with Glen Stoll), was Greater Ministries International, out of Tampa, Florida which ran a Ponzi scheme which bilked 18,000 persons out of a half a billion dollars (only $500 million, if you view life as a cup only half full). GMI was prosecuted by the Justice Department.  One of the best background reports on GMI is published by the  ADL, or the Anti- Defamation League website. While there are several groups such as the ADL and Rightwing Watch that I differ with when it comes to  political and religious ideology, some of their research and investigative journalism is top-notch and cannot be ignored.

When a Bible believing Christian has to rely on atheists and other watch groups for the truthful reporting of the facts of so called Christian fraudulent schemes, something is definitely amiss in the world of the Truthtellers of the Christian Alternative News Media. The Champions for Kent Hovind do not have clean hands; for example, Dave Daubenmire, Steve Quayle, Douglas Hagmann, Joe Hagmann, V-The Guerrilla Economist, Chuck Baldwin, Pete Santilli, Alex Jones, Sheila Zilinksky, and who knows else that I will soon stumble across.

For more information on Glen Stoll, see Robert Baty’s website kehvrlb.com to read  Glen Stoll- Hovind, Hansen & Land Legal Scholar, NOT!  Also Baty has preserved a transcript of Pete Santelli’s phone call to Judge Rodgers on behalf of Kent Hovind.