The Brotherhood Buried Alive: Part I of A Book Review of The Most Dangerous Book In The World: 9/11 as Mass Ritual

I am usually busy throughout the day, so often my best reading times are just before sunrise, alone, with a cup of coffee.  So at that dark hour I have been looking over a book by S. K. Bain called The Most Dangerous Book in the World:  9/11 as Mass Ritual.

How did I end up at this end of the spectrum of 9/11? Well, as I moved away from the  Christian Alternative Media, I noted a Doug Hagmann interview of Rebekah Roth which was conducted in April 2017, and from there took a closer look at one of the endorsers of her book, Barbara Honegger, a former Reagan  White House insider.

In the Seattle Truthers’ 9/11 video featuring Honegger,  she lays down a foundational power point at the beginning, referencing the Project for the New American Century’s paper,  Rebuilding America’s Defenses:  Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century.   This rather dull, over generalized, piece of writing, has been presented as a key component in the 9/11 Truthers’ arsenal. It would seem that an argument was presented in 2000 that a new Pearl Harbor was necessary to provide the impetus for a sustained build up of our military.  And in the same manner that the Protocols of Zion  have been presented as “proof” of the Illuminati game plan, so this paper has been put forth as “proof” of the methodology and strategy behind the 9/11 events.

So here is our stopping off point on this journey and why we are going to examine The Most Dangerous Book in the World:  9/11 as Mass Ritual.   On the back cover we read this paragraph linking the author to the PNAC organization:   “S. K. Bain is the former art director of The Weekly Standard magazine, where he worked with William Kristol, Fred Barnes, David Brooks, Tucker Carlson and others for over five years.  During part of that time, the Project for the New American Century shared offices with the publication, and next door was the Philanthropy Roundtable, where Bain art directed for Philanthropy magazine.  The Roundtable at that point was under the leadership of John P. Walters, who went on to become President George W. Bush’s Drug Czar.”

There is a sort of Alice in Wonderland connection between an author who decides to write a book interpreting the occult symbolism of 9/11 as “Mass Ritual”, and the fact that office space was shared with the Project for the New American Century.  And given that the subject matter of 9/11 as a mass ritual  fits in with the underlying motif at Tracking the Leopard Meroz, which is subtitled The Wisdom, Madness and Folly of Satan’s Sacrifices….a book review seems in order.

The Most Dangerous Book in the World-9/11 as Mass Ritual was copyrighted in 2012 and published by Trine Day LLC out of Walterville, OR.  I had previously, in this blog, reviewed another one of their publications, Expendable Elite:  One Soldier’s Journey Into Covert Warfare by Lieutenant Colonel USASF (Ret.) Daniel Marvin. That true story involved the attempted CIA assassination of a Special Forces operation group in Vietnam that refused to take part in an illegal operation.

The Prologue of Bain’s book was written by Peter Levenda in July 2012, and is titled, Knock, Knock in reference to the act of requesting entrance into the meeting places of secret brotherhoods.  He begins, “It was inevitable that this book would be written.  There is, among conspiracy aficionados, a kind of brotherhood. (I use the gender-specific term “brotherhood” deliberately.)  It is a brotherhood buried alive.  What does that mean?”

Levenda says that his use of the term brotherhood is gender specific, meaning it excludes female participants.  So good-bye Rebekah Roth and Barbara Honegger!  We are entering into the male dominated world of conspiracy and occult enthusiasts.

His second paragraph begins, “Imagine a person buried alive”. My mind comes to a complete halt upon reading this,  as back in February 2002 I had a very strange personal experience involving such a scenario.  I was living in Denton, Texas at the time, and one day when I went to Walmart I was overcome with an overwhelming sense of fear in the parking lot.  This same sense of fear hit me on 3 occasions over a week, at that same locality.  I wondered why, as I could not see any rational reason for it.

Across the street from Walmart,  a new shopping center called Denton Crossing was undergoing site preparation.  As it turned out, after huge holes had been unearthed by a bull dozer, a man who was a soil engineer went down to get soil samples as required.  He was buried alive as tons of soil dropped on him, while he was at the bottom of a hole, apparently unnoticed by anyone.   It was a horrific scene to contemplate.  His wife had not known why he had not come home in the evening. As all possible reasons for his disappearance were examined, they began to be haunted by the impossible…and so they dug his lifeless body out of the ground.  What personally struck me was that my sense of horror across the street from this locality did not come after the event, but days before.  I was left wondering what exactly I  had perceived in my spirit.

Levenda,  after saying, “Imagine a person buried alive”, tells the reader,  “Imagine yourself…”. He discusses the ritual and symbolic “slain, burial, and raised again” initiatory programs around the world, but does not mention the case of the life and death of Jesus Christ, who was both man and God, and the only reason why occultists throughout the centuries have attempted through ritual to gain the power of His resurrection by God.

Peter Levenda says  this ritual is “a liminal event:  you are on the threshold of living and dying, and in that sacred spot you can see in both directions”.  Liminal means threshold and refers to that sensory, barely perceptible threshold which is crossed when going through a doorway.  I  presume that “seeing in both directions” is an oblique reference to the initiatory process which turns a double-minded man into a Double Headed Eagle.

At this point I must insert an observation I had made when scanning the first part of this book on 9/11 as a mass ritual.  The author displays 5 full page photos of tarot cards, and when I saw that two of these cards were the same, but from two different decks, my curiosity was piqued.  In order, these cards are:  Tower card 16 from the Rider-Waite deck, Tower card 16 from an unknown deck with the word Trumps across the bottom, Devil card 15, Death card 13, and The Star card 17. The total equals 77,  a number which the author devotes much space to interpreting.

So if the author, S. K. Bain is playing number games with his illustrations,  we ought to be observing where he is incorporating the Tarot into his work in a hidden manner.

And why not see what is not mentioned in the Prologue written by Lavenda using the knock, knock attempt to gain Gnosis by crossing a threshold of a doorway to a secret brotherhood. Oh, that act just happens to be represented by Tarot Card 2.  He also makes comments about the author  which declares Bains to be a 21st century Kabbalist, and of course that would represent Tarot card I, the Magician.

Peter Levenda quotes Robert Anton Wilson on his concept of consensus reality.  But here is an interesting side quote which Wilson had noted in his book, The Historical Illuminatus Chronicles, as being spoken by Sigismundo Celine, saying, “Is”, “is’, “is”–the idiocy of the word haunts me.  If it were abolished, human thought might begin to make sense.  I don’t know what anything “is”, I only know how it seems to me at this moment.

It reminds me of Bill Clinton’s manner of justification for his White House intern tryst…. when he protested, whatever Is is.   It is also of interest that Neuro-linguistic programming is called a Magic Operation by its originators and has as one of its key features, the attempt to eliminate from the human language all references to a state of being.  Out goes words like be, is, am, etc. which reference the existence of something real which was created by the Creator.

We see that this same attitude of rebellion, that of the creature against the Creator, is inherent in this “consensus reality” which Levanda claims is a manmade social contract, the “We obey the laws that are created by other people….”.  There is nothing suggested by Levenda that the foundation of many laws are from the Holy Bible and given for our benefit.  Even the Declaration of Independence acknowledges  natural rights that come from our Creator.   Levanda says that conspiracy theorists have one foot in the world of consensus reality” and the other foot in “the darker mechanisms of reality.  As usual, in this Alternative Truther Universe, reference is made to those who are asleep and those who are awake.

Noting  those persons who go beyond the 9/11 evidence to acknowledge the “transcendental sources of power”, Peter Levenda adds, “This involves studying their texts, their social structures, their stated goals, their secret conclaves, their antinomian beliefs and practices.  One comes face to face with the Occult.  A strange journey, indeed, from a presidential assassination to an interview with the Devil”.

His words are the prologue to a book and so twice, Levenda identifies  the author, S. K. Bain as the 21st century Kabbalist, “we have been waiting for, and this —The Most Dangerous Book in the World—may prove to be his Sepher Yetzir, his Zohar, his Liber 777.  What he is saying is that Bain, as the Magician, has created his own grand grimoire, and I suppose the readers of such are being led down the road of the initiated in the dark arts.

Finally, Peter Levenda concludes, “Whether or not you believe in a conspiracy surrounding 9/11 is not really important.  The nature of Bain’s argument is such you will find your mind expanded by the new possibilities, the arcane possibilities lurking behind political and historical events.  By choosing to see 9/11 as a ritual on a massive scale, we paradoxically may better be able to understand it, to accommodate its message on a psychological –even spiritual–level as we approach the end of 2012 and the birth of a new aeon.”

S. K. Bain thought he had a predictive gift based on his own occult knowledge and could read the future of 2012, the year of the so-called birth of a new aeon.   This fictional predictive work was  called, The Next 9/11?  2012:  Black Christmas, and forms the second half of his book.  In hindsight, he was wrong, but he gets out of being called a false prophet, by calling it fiction. Knowing human nature, we presume that if he had been right, surely he would have triumphed in the level of  his magical skills, and felt himself a prophet.

One last word on Prologue writer,  Peter Levenda, who was accused of being the man behind the pen name Simon who wrote The Gates of the Necronomicon The book is copyrighted under Levenda’s name, as shown above. But he says he is not the author Simon, only the front man.  This is strange business.  See this link for an explanation from Levenda.

Under the Acknowledgements page of the 9//11 as Mass Ritual book, S. K. Bain notes two books on which he bases much of his interpretations.  These are Prophet of Evil:  Aleister Crowley, 9/11 and the New World Order by William Ramsey, and Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare by Michael A. Hoffman II. Overall, Bain has not written a scholarly work,  and so I am dismayed that he lifts so much material from that brilliant researcher and scholar,  Michael Hoffman II.

S. K. Bain has a very bizarre comment in the Acknowledgements page which I quote here:  “Lastly, I would like to express my deepest regrets to Nermal, the “forever kitten,” who didn’t survive the writing process due to a massive failure of patience on the part of the author late one night.  PETA notice: animals were harmed during the production of this work”.  There is a Tarot Card for Sacrifice, only it does not involve cats, but shows a man hanging upside down, as in the photo Bain uses to illustrate the jumpers from the Twin Tower buildings.

In Part II, I will explore Section One, called The Production.

 

 

Mizz Bluebeam Goes To Washington

The purpose of the Third Beam – championed and executed by Barbara Honegger with the enthusiastic support of AE911 Truth core team members…was to break through the media blackout surrounding Building 7’s fall and its censorship by the official 9/11 Commission Report.  As Barbara Honegger pressed the buttons on the high-power spotlights and the Beam ignited the night sky at exactly 9:11 p.m….
ae911truth.org Oct. 8, 2010 article “Third Beam Shines Light On Government and Media Blackout of WTC 7”

In the May 9, 2017 post called Operation Coffee, Tea or Me?,  I wondered why Barbara Honegger, described as a former White House Policy Analyst & Dept. of Defense Sr. Military Affairs journalist 2000-2011,  offered her endorsement of the novel, Methodical Illusion, and the 9/11 theories of its author Rebekah Roth.  Honegger said that what Roth had accomplished  was “cutting the Gordian Knot of two of the most difficult and disturbing unanswered questions of 9/11.”

During the Hagmann Report  interview of Rebekah Roth in April of this year, two comments were made which may shed light on the factors connecting  Roth and Honegger.

The first involved a Synchronistic Moment involving a gas station receipt totaling  $9.11, which Rebekah Roth and her husband declared to be a sign from God that she should include in her novel, a certain detail she had discovered that proved the passengers on the planes had been executed by gassing.   The second statement of Roth which caused The Huh? Factor to spring to life, was when she declared, I died when I was fifteen.  Now I know why I came back.  Because I see puzzles and put them together…”

The bona fides of Honegger, at first glance, are in sharp contrast to the Honegger look-alike Rebekah Roth’s, who had a 32 year career as an airline stewardess, according to her most recent declarations. As I wondered about this sharp disparity,  I took a quick look at a video which featured Barbara Honegger speaking in Seattle on the 9/11 Pentagon attack.  The first few minutes of her presentation was professionally done, with power point projections, and a well organized and articulate delivery, so I was puzzled as to why Honegger thought so highly of the slippery methodology of fiction writer, Rebekah Roth.

As it turns out, Barbara Honegger received her undergraduate degree from Stanford in Creative Writing, and then later got her Masters in Parapsychology from John F. Kennedy University.  So Honegger and Roth share a commonality after all:  creative writing,  and an extreme view on that odd aspect of human life known as synchronicity.  An autobiographical note can be found at The Other Side of Midnight.com, shown below, which expands on these themes:

Autobiographical note on Barbara Honegger at The Other Side of Midnight.com

Barbara Honegger came from a family that provided her with worthy examples of accomplishments.  Both parents went to Stanford. Her father, William Beverly Honegger, went to Naval Officer Training School in Evanston, IL, and he was “part of the Northern Pacific fleet at Iwo Jima and an officer on a destroyer escort that sailed into Tokyo Bay for the surrender of Japan.” Barbara also went to Stanford, was associated later with the Hoover Institution, and became a military affairs journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School, which has been described as the premier science, technology and national security affairs graduate research university of the Department of Defense.

During the time when Ms. Honegger worked at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, doing research for Dr. Martin Anderson, he became the Chief Domestic Policy Advisor for President Reagan. Dr. Anderson brought Barbara with him to Washington D.C.;  therefore situating her responsibilities and influence within the inner sanctum of the White House.

Barbara Honegger’s theories of 9/11 have been discussed in detail by various persons and published online.  What I want to focus on at this moment is a 2 minute segment of a 3 hour video highlighting the speech given by Barbara Honegger at a 9/11 Truth Conference, (published May 13, 2013) in a video entitled, 9/11 Pentagon Attack-Behind the Smoke Curtain.

At the 22.50 mark of this video, Barbara Honegger says, “To succeed, the real inside job 9/11 Psy-Op required a critical mass of innocent deaths.  Believe it or not, after the World Trade Center attack in 1993 that killed, I believe ,5 people and injured about 1,000, Federal Agents were heard to say by reporter Steven Emerson, that “there had not been enough deaths this time”.  After the 1993 World Trade Center attacks, also most people don’t know this, but the World Trade Center Towers roof doors were locked, ordered locked, by official New York City policy.  So that on 9/11,  it happened because of that, that the innocent victims above the impact zone were trapped, terrorized, and killed.  They had no way to escape except to jump.  The New York Times published, I believe, that 105 victims had gotten right up to the door, where in 1993 they did, were able to go up onto the roof; but they were blocked.  Also, after the impacts and before the towers fell, dozens of military and civilian helicopters self-dispatched.  Wonderful people from the military started flying toward the NY city intending to rescue survivors from the towers to risk their lives in their helicopters.  There were ordered to go to a nearby military base so that they could not respond.”(24.20)

It is obvious to most inquirers into the events of  9/11, that the attacks were planned and carried out by those who had the motive, means and opportunity to carry out  a very  sophisticated assault. But it matters not whether you believe that these attacks were carried out by Muslim hijackers, the United States Government,  or Israeli Special Ops, those involved have blood dripping from their hands which cries out to God for justice.

When it comes to blood guilt,   Barbara Honegger makes an interesting assertion:  she claims that a Psy-Op requires a Critical Mass of Innocent Deaths.  The phrase critical mass is taken from  nuclear physics, and refers to the “smallest amount of fissile material needed for a sustained nuclear chain reaction”.  So what Honneger is suggesting is that there is a minimum number of innocent deaths that must occur, for the desired psychological chain reaction of a Psy-Op to sustain itself.

Quoting Steven Emerson on the critical mass of innocent deaths, Honegger argues that the matter of whether the WTC roof top doors were locked or not, was a significant factor in the differences of the number of persons killed on 9/11 as compared to the 1993 attack.  However, in  1993 while there were some persons rescued from the WTC roof level; the bombs had gone off in the basement, which allowed most everyone to escape.  It was thought later that those who had fled to the roof, had in reality the option of walking down to safety via the stairwells.

The general consensus of many 9/11 commentators, was that the locked roof top doors on 9/11 was a moot point, as within a very short time the smoke conditions atop the roofs made helicopter rescues an impossibility.It is curious that Honegger would target the policy of keeping the WTC  roof doors locked as proof that there was a deliberate attempt to ensure that a maximum number of innocent deaths would occur on 9/11. The smoke of the fires burning at the impact level effectively nullified all attempts to escape alive.

What the tragic and horrific end of those who were trapped on the highest floors symbolizes is Tarot Card 16, which displays a burning tower with no escape for those at the top, except to jump to their deaths.

The concept of blood sacrifice and that of blood guilt, is a fundamental concept in the Bible.  Likewise, we know that Satan is interested in blood sacrifices, as a means of empowering his own form of government.

I am going to switch your focus for a moment from the critical mass of  the 9/11 deaths to another form of blood sacrifice which Barbara Honegger had been highly interested in during the Reagan years. As a  policy advisor to President Reagan on women’s rights, Honegger wrote a white paper with the purpose of  getting all legal restraints lifted from that form of blood sacrifice called abortion.

On  December 2, 2015, Guns And Butter host  Bonnie Faulkner interviewed Barbara Honegger for a show called, We the Men vs. We the People: Reframing the Abortion Issue to Prevent Violent Escalation of The Culture War. (This link also provides a transcript of this very excellent interview, if you want to read the entire context of the sections which I am going to comment on.)

In the Introduction of this Guns and Butter interview by Bonnie Faulkner, Barbara Honegger is quoted as saying:Reading the above quotation, we must remember that abortion is an act that is performed on a woman to remove a fetus from her body’s uterus. The woman undergoing this procedure, had in most cases consented to intercourse with a man.  The uterus at no time has the power to consent or decline sexual relations between the woman and the man. Abortion represents a blood sacrifice of an innocent fetus, which if it were allowed to develop, will become a fully developed human being. In many such situations, the blood guilt falls on more than one person; often the man, family members or friends have exerted pressure on the woman,  resulting in this tragic outcome of abortion.

Barbara Honegger introduces in her White Paper  on abortion, an argument based on  a dissimilar court case.  This particular case involved a plaintiff who needed a life saving bone marrow transplant who tried to legally force his cousin, who was a compatible donor, into undergoing extraction of his  bone marrow without the donor’s consent.  Interestingly, the main argument which the plaintiff made came from Roe v. Wade!

Barbara Honegger says that the third trimester portion of this famous abortion case, “is the only  part of Roe v. Wade that gives an exception to the otherwise almost absolute right under Roe v. Wade of a pregnant woman to end her pregnancy.  In the third trimester of Roe v. Wade she’s not allowed to under all circumstances-only to save her own health.”

Barbara Honegger tells Guns and Butter host, Bonnie Faulkner, the following:

In the above quote, Honegger refers to her white paper argument as a paradigm shift.  Now this is interesting, because as a policy advisor to the White House, she was in a position of influence which potentially could cause a major shift in the a priori definition of abortion; that it is a medical procedure done on a woman in order to terminate the life of a fetus. It is difficult for me to see that the facts of the organ transplant donation lawsuit represent the same boundaries of consent which are found in the normal abortion case.  If we consider the most common case of abortion, which involves a woman who has granted a man access to her body in an consensual sex act, she, as well as the man, were voluntarily risking  conception.

Barbara Honegger’s attempt to cause a paradigm shift in how we think of abortion, would appear to be a means of redefining terms so as to eliminate blood guilt.

Compare what Barbara Honegger did in attributing 9/11 blood guilt to those who were responsible for preventing access to the roof tops of two 110 story skyscrapers, with her attempt to eliminate the blood guilt in abortion.

At the heart of the matter of the problem of fire escapes in tall buildings is that the architects have limited by design, options which might conceivably have been built into the outside of the structure to allow persons to escape fires which had cut off the inner stairwells. Rescuing persons from the top of a 110 story building is difficult enough, without having to contend with the rising smoke from a major fire. The fact that present day fire evacuation plans for high rises does not meet the ideal goal, does not necessarily mean that those who are involved in policy making had evil intentions.

As a reminder of Honegger’s presentation on this matter, see the screenshot below referring to the success of the 9/11 Psy-Op as requiring a Critical Mass Of Innocent Deaths.In contrast to her harsh judgment on the motives of persons in the WTC fire escape plans, Barbara Honegger showed no such similar strictness in her white paper  on abortion.  In fact, her motive was to  create an air tight legal argument for justifying the act of taking the life of an innocent fetus. She seems rather pleased by her clever sophistry which results in a paradigm shift in thinking.  Is not the effecting of a paradigm shift the exact same thing as what we call a Psy-Op?You see, deep in the human heart, we know that we have to give an account one day of our deeds, whether we believe in God or not.  That is the fundamental reason why you will find that the orchestrated blood sacrifices of innocents which undergird Psy-Ops, also involves a clever web of sophistry, lies, and faulty arguments to justify their own blood guilt.

At first we were told that the Twin Towers were hit by commercial jets, then by missiles, then by holograms. Something is being reframed.  Barbara Honegger, through her family connections, gets a degree from Stanford University in creative writing, then a Masters in Parapsychology, becomes a research assistant which allows the ultra feminist Mizz Bluebeam to go to Washington D.C. to create an argument which would eliminate the guilt of the blood sacrifice of innocent newly conceived humans in the womb of their “Mother”.

What is at the end of the World Trade Center’s Trinity of Blue beams? As I understand it, it was Barbara Honegger who was responsible for getting the third beam authorized.  Might it have something to do with that other project known as Blue Beam?One wonders what Critical Mass of innocent deaths will have to be reached, for that event to occur, and whether the mounting count of abortions done in America since the 1960’s are reaching the sustained nuclear reaction stage of a Psy-Op which is more horrific than 9/11.

 

 

 

 

 

As Rebekah Roth Continues To Insult Our Intelligence, Is The Pentagon Gaming Her For Their Personal Amusement?

“I am considered by many to be a foremost expert on the events of September 11, 2001.”  Rebekah Roth, author of 3 novels:  Methodical Illusion, Methodical Deception, and Methodical Conclusion.

Methodical Illusion was published on November 3, 2014, and was inititally heavily promoted by various Alternative Media radio hosts.  By the end of  2015, some of these same radio hosts had decided to investigate the credentials of the woman using the pen name  Rebekah Roth. Finally, a document by the author was brought forth as shown in this screenshot. Here is the link to this thread on lunaticoutpost.com.The link given to the supporting video now says that this video is unavailable. However, the fact that the image of this purser’s certificate from Northwest Airlines dated April 7, 2001, has been preserved on other websites creates a question. Rebekah Roth AKA Koreann Ashlie Nourani says on her About/Author Page “…This book is the result of extensive research. It is based on real life events.  It is written as a novel to protect me and my family from the repercussions that inevitably occur when you get too close to the truth.”  Ironically, just below this, the author has inserted this quote from Pearl Bailey, You never find yourself until you face the truth.

So, if Rebekah Roth claims that she was hiding her true identity behind a pen name and a fictional form of writing because she had gotten too close to the truth, but she later discloses one of her legal names to prove that she had been an airline stewardess with Northwest Airlines, would not this act nullify any complaints she makes against those who had revealed her real identity?

In January of 2016, sgtreport.com posted an article, asking Who is Rebekah Roth? Andrew brings up some thoughts on her background in the comment section of this post.  See screenshot below:  

The article which Andrew links to at jamesperloff.com is a well considered opinion piece written January 1, 2016 and entitled, Some in Truth Movement are asking questions about Rebekah Roth.

The April, 2017 Hagmann Report Interview of Rebekah Roth

With this past controversy shadowing Rebekah Roth, we are going to take a look at what this author says about herself, her novels and her 9/11 theories during an interview on The Hagmann Report several weeks ago on April 4, 2017.  The link to this show on the Hagmann YouTube site can be found here: False Flags, False Faith:  Rebekah Roth & Pastor Lankford. The interview begins around the 36.25 mark and finishes at the second hour. Douglas Hagmann first asks Rebekah Roth to introduce herself.

Rebekah Roth (37.02)…I refer to myself as like an accidental author.  I set out actually to write a novel, a fun, fluffy, summer novel for women to read about being a flight attendant, because I had a really great life as a flight attendant and I really enjoyed it and I met lots of really interesting people.  So I thought, well, this will be a kind of a fun read and I got actually you’ll see this in Methodical Illusion because I really wanted the reader to know what a flight attendant did and what it was like and because before I started flying I had no idea.  They could have handed me a sleeping bag with a logo on it and said take the last row and I’ll wake you up an hour before (UI)… I had no idea what I was getting into.

So after about 32 years of flying and I retired in 2004- I stopped flying.  So I have been flying for a long time. And ah, I thought around 2008 to 9, somewhere in there, I’ll just write this fun novel.  About 3 chapters into it I wanted to introduce this character Grace who is kind of all about gold and jewelry to a Middle Eastern man who was going to shower her with gifts.  And I Google-searched the 9/11 hijackers and found that ten of them were still alive.  And it just shocked me.  I was like “What?”.

I was like I believe the story,  as impossible as it is for an aluminum airplane to go through a sky scraper like I saw that morning on TV, and then the Shanksville and Pentagon-no airplane parts, and there is always a large tail section and landing gear and the titanium engine parts- there’s always parts that are there. And none of that was there; especially in Shanksville.  And it was just like a ditch with nothing and I remember hearing the coroner say, “Well, there was no blood, there was no bodies, there was no sign of a plane crash there”.

But yet I kept working, because, I mean, what are you going to say?  I mean I couldn’t go out and tell people that didn’t happen, – because I watched it on TV-  it did happen, right?  So I was so shocked,  I  literally just dropped my fun novel, and I started researching every thing I could.  Now granted, this was like 7 or 8 years after, and so the Zacarias Moussaoui trial had happened.

Ah, and what I found was what really intrigued me was the FBI’s transcripts from that morning, from about noon, and there are typed up transcripts from recordings they took from people that were involved, like the reservations agent that took the phone call from Betty Ong at American Airlines, and stuff and this.  And then as I was gathering all of these FBI documents I noticed that they’d left some statements out.  And when Betty Ong said, “We’re the first.”,  they later on took that out and I said, “How could she know they were the first of four airplanes because that was flight 11, it was the first one to be supposedly hijacked.

And then Betty Ong said this, she said, ah, he, as in one of the hijackers, and we were told there were several, “He sprayed pepper spray or mace and for Business class and we can’t breathe up in Business class”.  And my brain just went to all these Honolulu flights, flights where babies poo-pooed or people got sick and vomited or rum from Duty Free was dropped and broke and that smell in a pressurized cabin goes through the whole airplane.  I don’t care if it’s the 727 or a 747, it’s all circulated air.

And with pepper spray or mace, something that’s really hard to deal with, I went, oh my goodness, that means they’re not pressurized.  Because you wouldn’t be able to breathe any where in that airplane if you were pressurized.    And that’s really when I, I got that sinking feeling, and I thought, oh no, this is something really strange.  They aren’t in the air because another thing happened, was their phone calls were 27 minutes from the 2 flight attendants who called out on that flight which is impossible for a cell phone and an air phone…so I just..

Doug Hagmann:  Wait a second, why for an air phone?  I can understand the cell phone…(41.27) (they discuss the history of the installation and workings of these phones)

(46.54) (continuing the discussion about flight attendant Betty Ong on flight 11)

Rebekah Roth: (46.54) …she also said, “We’re the first”. And I thought, well, somebody had to tell her that because she wouldn’t have known about the hijackings that came later on and uh then she said something else that really triggered me because I spent a lot of time in large aircraft hangers.  Because that is where flight attendant offices often are- on the Mezzanine level, which is up above.  So they all have from the large hanger space, they have stairs.  Usually they’re in at least two, sometimes three corners of the large hanger and so she said, “he stood upstairs”. There are no stairs in a 767.  Only in a 747.

And I thought, what an odd thing for her to say, and when I realized that they weren’t pressurized, and she said, “He stood upstairs”.  I knew they were in a large hanger, and so I immediately and this was within 20 minutes of Boston Logan Airport, and I flew out of Boston, so I immediately went on Google Earth and I drew a line to see how far an airplane could go and I have a pretty good idea because I flew for 32 years and I looked out the window. (47.56)

Tracking the Leopard Meroz comments:  Official documentation found on the internet proves that Rebekah Roth choose the corrupted transcription of the tape recording of Betty Ong, over a true transcription which matched the audio word for word.  And even though she was reproved for this in a 22 minute January 24, 2016 YouTube Video put out by Conspiracy Theorista, called RothFraud Truthday Part I-NO ONE STOOD UPSTAIRS, Rebekah Roth continues to promote her story which is based on false information.

Rebekah Roth: (50.56)  And I’m here to tell you this.  I really wanted to be wrong.  I wanted to be wrong more than anybody else. I, I, I really when I found out that the cell phones for all four calls worked with the flight time to get to that Air Force Base that had been evacuated, was completely empty except for those four planes coming in.  I wanted to be so wrong when every one of those flights that came out of Dulles, Washington D.C., Newark, New Jersey, the New York area and then Boston and when the phone calls started with exactly when they had landed and probably had taxied into one of those large C-5 transport hangers.  And literally my stomach flipped when that happened.  I thought, oh my God, don’t let this be true.  I tried for months to debunk myself. I like, don’t let this be true!  Because that told me that everything we had been told and shown on 9/11 was an illusion. And that’s how I got the title.

Doug Hagmann:  Hence the title.  Right.

Rebekah Roth:  The word methodical..

Doug Hagmann:  But I’m sorry I didn’t mean..you you had referenced an air hanger, and so you’re you’re ah you’re postulating- your theory is that the aircraft-I don’t want to put words in your mouth.  Uh, what you said there about the airfield-airstrip-air uh hanger-the ultimate destination of the aircraft, the four aircraft on 9/11 is kind of where I’m pushing towards..

Rebekah Roth:  What they needed..

Doug Hagmann:  Go ahead.

Rebekah Roth: What they needed because the aircraft are jumbos, so the 767 are double aisle aircraft.  It’s similar to the size of a DC-10.

Doug Hagmann:  Right.

Rebekah Roth: They need about a 10,000 foot runway to land full of fuel.  And so what I started to do was to look within a 20 minute circle of Boston, because that was the first two flights out of Boston, for a runway.  That’s how I found the Air Force Base….(53.04)

Tracking the Leopard Meroz comments: The author  speculates, but does not detail precisely how her thesis translates into a factually based, mathematical style timeline which matches reality.

Pentagon Top Military Intelligence Contacts Rebekah Roth

Rebekah Roth:  (1.02.46) And the reason I’m going to tell you why I say that with total authority is that after Methodical Conclusion I’ve been contacted by people that were working inside the Pentagon in top level military intelligence on 9/11.  And that is the word they used.  Missile.

Doug Hagmann:  Interesting.

Rebekah Roth: ..I’ve been told that it is uh the series which is being read all through Washington D.C.  Donald Trump has all of them, um, I don’t know that he’s read them yet but uh I know he has all 3 books uhhh- the Pentagon people are reading them and it’s going like wild fire through the Pentagon and I’ve been told by 3 different sources that I, should I, should be ready to go to a Congressional Hearing- and I’m ready.  I’m on it.

Doug Hagmann: (1.03.37) Really!

Rebekah Roth: (1.03.42)  So, yeah it’s very interesting because they contacted me, he contacted me- he’s now retired- and said I want you to have my story.  And I,  he even sent me Google maps-screenshots of where exactly he was standing outside the Pentagon near the guard railing that you see in a lot of photographs between the lawn, the guard railing, the lawn and then the building.  When the explosion hit- he was standing outside and I am here to tell you that if a Boeing 757 were 100 feet over your head you would know it.(1.04.17)

…(1.07.11)  Rebekah Roth relates that the retired Pentagon employee  wanted to have his story told with someone he could trust as he was there.

Tracking the Leopard Meroz comments: You have one guess as to who sent the fictional series of Rebekah Roth to the President of the United States. In the fantasy world of the author’s mind,  the main character Vera is the fictional match of Rebekah Roth AKA Koreann Ashlie Nourani. Vera’s husband, Jeff represents Michael Harris AKA Ramjet, the author’s husband.  In her plot, her beloved husband has been murdered, leaving the President of the United States to romantically pursue Vera.

Screenshot of Methodical Deception paragraph on  Vera’s husband’s death as shown on Amazon.com.

Amazon.com

Screenshot of Methodical Deception paragraphs on Presidential interest in Vera:

Amazon.com

Is it any wonder that these books are a hot number at the Pentagon?  I would be very leery of any man who said he was from the Pentagon whose proof of his claims was a Google Earth shot, who said he wanted to tell his exclusive story to Rebekah Roth, a woman’s romance novelist, because he trusted her.

Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.  Sir Walter Scott (Marmion, 1808)

Hawking Her Books and Hidden Research Results

Doug Hagmann: (1.08.14) ( holds up his autographed book Methodical Conclusion and gives a sales spiel-“fantastic book”, tells his listeners where to order a copy and recommends to “get it autographed”, which is an extra cost option.  At (1.12.25) Doug Hagmann mentions that Rebekah Roth is coming out with a fourth book.

Rebekah Roth: (1.09) Methodical was the code word I would use as a flight attendant to let the captain know there was a protocol for hijacking, that there’s a hijacker on board…(1.10.24)…and every hijack protocol that was not followed by any of the flight attendants, and there was like 26 or 28 flight attendants involved on those four jets. (1.10:26)

(Later on, Rebekah Roth claims that many airline attendants believe her, since she knew what the code word was.)

At this point in the interview, flight termination systems and remote control of airplanes is discussed.

Rebekah Roth: (1.14.00) When that system took over a few things happened.  One, the airplane fell off of the radar.  The Air Traffic control could no longer see a blip and the pilot and the flight attendants lost communication with each other.  Now we’re their eyes and ears so if there is a hijacker in the cabin they would only know if we told them.

But one of the things that Betty Ong said was we can’t communicate with the pilots-they aren’t answering their phone and I realized right then and there that they’ve been taken over remotely, more than likely the pilots were uh thinking that the plane was crashing because it started a landing without their commands. They were descend.. uh ascending out of Boston still, they were about probably 15-16,000 feet, climbing up to 32,000 was  I think was their original initial cruising altitude and I think they were going to go up to 35.  But I have their flight plans now so after my first book came out and I got a terabyte Freedom of Information Act data and then people started coming forward and helping me read it and that’s kind of how the third book came out ah with a lot of help from some real big American heroes and I would love to be able to name them all for you, but to keep them safe, I can’t you know. (1.15.18)

Tracking the Leopard Meroz comments:  Previously, at the 1.01.32 mark, Rebekah Roth discussed that for a period of time all 757’s and 767’s came off the assembly line with a remote control access.  She says that Boeing was trying to sell a flight termination system, and the pilots she knew at that time expressed concern over this possibility.  Also at the time of 9/11 the Comptroller of the Pentagon, who was being examined for missing funds, was also the owner of a company that sold flight termination devices. For background on these comments, read the January 31, 2015 Veterans Today article Airline Whistleblower Solves 9/11 written by Kevin Barrett.

Also, earlier at the 47.57 mark, Rebekah Roth says, “Don’t forget now that we don’t get out of our jump seats until the aircraft levels off.  So things aren’t happening 5 minutes after a departure.  No hijackers are going to stand, no pilots are coming out of the cockpit, no flight attendants are going to be out of their jump seat until that airplane reaches somewhat of a cruising altitude….48.53 so I realized that everything that happened on flight 11 started happening at 18 minutes after takeoff.”

HistoryCommons.org has compiled documentation from various sources and on this page displays the Complete 911 Timeline of American Flight 11. The scheduled departure time for Flight 11 was 7:45 and its takeoff time is recorded as 7:59, 14 minutes later. Sometime between 8:13 and 8:21 the flight transponder was turned off.  But it was concluded that the plane was hijacked at 8:14, probably over Gardner, MA which is 45 minutes NW of Boston.  At 8:18 am flight attendant Betty Ong calls the Reservation Office to report her observations. While this call is reported to last 25 minutes, it is only recorded for 4 minutes, as the recording device has a default time limit.

Note that the theory of Rebekeh Roth relies on a corrupted transcript of the four minute recording of Betty Ong as foundational to her thesis that Betty Ong at 8.18 am, 19 minutes after takeoff of flight 11, was actually sitting in a hanger at the Westover Air Force Base, reading a script.

Kevin Barrett in an article dated January 13,2015 for Veterans Today, where he supports Rebekah Roth as being the Airlines Whistleblower (who) Solves 9/11, stated “According to the author’s hypothesis, the FTS-captured-and-silenced planes landed at a nearby Air Force base with gigantic hangars, which Roth identifies and a colleague who was there confirms happened, less than 20 minutes after takeoff.  Once on the ground, selected flight attendants and passengers were guided (or forced) to place cell phone calls, during which they read scripts prepared by the perpetuators.” 

My question is whether or not it can be reasonably assumed that a commercial jet can take off from the Boston Logan Airport,  land on the runway at the Westover Air Reserve Base in Chicopee, MA, taxi to a hanger, get the passengers off of the airplane, and then set down a flight attendant, give her instructions on reading her script….and have all of these actions transpire within an 18-19 minute timeframe? I am incredulous, and since Rebekah Roth seems to think it is my job, and not her job, to test and prove her hypothesis…I grit my teeth…arghhh! Try persuading your high school teacher that you have decided to delegate to her the responsibility for proving your assumptions which undergird your research. And Rebekah Roth claims she studied the hard sciences in college.

So in this peculiar state of hanging by the noose of total ignorance from the gallows of the illusive mind of that foremost 9/11 expert, Rebekah Roth, I decide to cut the rope.  First I shall imitate the author’s method of handling perplexities by studying Google Maps. I type in the directions box, the starting and ending points of Boston’s Logan Airport and the Westover Air Reserve Base, and I click on the airplane icon.  It says there are no flights between those two points!  Ah, ha!  Is this indisputable  proof that Rebekah Roth is a liar?

Well, OK, humor aside,  let’s continue on with my initial inquiry.  Suppose there was a Remote chance that there was a direct flight between those two airports on 9/11.  Let’s see, by car the distance between the two airports is 92 miles. But an airplane would have to ascend, and then descend, thus increasing the number of miles of flight by whatever triangle or trapezoid shape the airplane described in the air. And Rebekah Roth surmises that the aircraft reached the 15-16,000 foot level. I am not a pilot, so I have no real life experience of determining what the air speed of ascent and descent would be in the case of a jet covering a ground distance of 92 miles. So I look at the information given on Flight 11 to see if there is anything there I can use to make a rough, but reasonable estimate.

According to the HistoryCommons.org timeline, at about 8:14, or 15 minutes into the flight, it was believed that Flight 11 was over Gardner, MA which the record estimated was about 45 miles NW of Boston.  Google Maps shows a driving distance of 59 miles between Logan and Gardner, and so I will give Rebekah Roth the benefit of the doubt and employ the greater distance.

Using the ratio comparison of 59 miles/92 miles, we arrive at the equivalent ratio of 15 minutes/23 minutes.  So a very rough guess could be argued that  it would take this flight approximately 23 minutes to cover a ground distance of 92 miles.  This exceeds our 18/19 window by about  5 minutes. Note that we had not even factored in descent speed, the time it would take to taxi to a hanger, and the time necessary to get the airline attendant prepared to read her script.

What such a rudimentary examination suggests is that Rebekah Roth’s thesis that Flight 11 had landed at Westover, is unsupportable on the most basic,  practical level.  When we note also that she had been dishonest in misrepresenting the transcription evidence of Betty Ong’s phone conversation, I consider Rebekah Roth’s “revelations” to be grossly misleading.

Rebekah Roth is offended when people ask her, Are you for real?

Rebekah Roth:  (1.15.18)  And you know people say well, you know, you’re not real, or that’s not real, how do you know?  I do know because I sat with them and the best way that you can really experience what we experienced is in the last five chapters of Methodical Conclusion.  And when I think about it, the hair on my back of my neck stands up and my stomach will flip and I still, I still react because the conversation that you get from Tom the air traffic controller and the others when they realize what they are seeing and it can only be the bodies from the plane that were up in Westover being brought into Andrew and it is on radar and when I and an air traffic controller sat on Skype with this- we each had the file going through this.  What we experienced as best as I can give you was that moment in that book and to this moment I can still have my stomach flip and hear him say, “Oh my God”,  and he was a military air traffic controller..

Doug Hagmann:  Yep.

Rebekah Roth:   And he knows what he was looking at and he knew where they came from, and so did I.  And we literally were speechless.  And that when I got to that information and I was writing the book I really, I really totaled.  Should I put that detail in? Because this answers everybody’s question, what did they do with the people?  The bodies.  And here’s another thing that happened and has happened since then.  I was contacted- do we have enough time to tell you this?

Doug Hagmann:  Sure.

Rebekah Roth:  I was contacted by the adult child, kind of like the one sitting next to you, young, in his thirties now, whose father was a flight attendant on board who had taken him out on a drive about a week before 9/11.  He’d been flying for less than a year I believe, 9 to 10 months, something like that,  not enough time to hold a transcontinental flight on a schedule, so which made me kind of look at all the crew members with a hmmm, how were they there, why were they there?

Well, now here’s how I found out. He said to his son, I’ve been offered a job with the CIA.  The only thing is if I take that job I will never ever be able to see you or your brother again.  Now I bet you know CIA guys because I know some intelligence people and they have families and they have children and they don’t unless they’re faking their death, they don’t ever have to never see their kids again.  Now this was in the week before 9/11, the weekend before his mother, who was on the verge of divorce with the father was flown back to Boston where he was based and signed life insurance papers.  Now this by the way was a black belt in several martial arts, he’d been a police officer for some 20 years and I said well, let me just ask you this:  if your Dad was a flight attendant and there were 2 five-foot-six hijackers onboard with a box cutter, what would he have done?  Because he didn’t do anything.  He’s not really even mentioned in the story.

Doug Hagmann:  Right.

Rebekah Roth: And only the two passengers that telephoned out and so ah, you’re wondering,  if two passengers phoned out, why didn’t the crew on this one?  Cuz the first one was only 2 crew members, but 80 passengers didn’t phone out. So then, ah, I got the answer from him later then when a Delta flight attendant finished reading Methodical Conclusion.  She contacted me and we talked on the phone and ah that book really -lots of people woke up.  Oh, wait, especially us airline people, because she  told me I am here to tell you, I was, I think she had 27 years seniority and at the time, she was I think in her late forties, flying for Delta and a CIA recruiter was on their flight and offered them jobs, told them that they loved airline employees because they have a great cover job.  And we had great days off so we could take off and our neighbors wouldn’t think anything of it being gone on vacation or traveling around because we could go anywhere for 10 or 20 dollars.  And so she actually even went to a recruiting meeting and she said “You are right”.

And now I am questioning how many of the pilots and other crew members were indeed also working for the CIA, so I’m here to tell you square in my chair that 9/11 was a Central Intelligence Agency and Mossad Operation with the help of GCHQ or MI6, because the pilots of that big huge Russian cargo were British.  So that Intelligence agents that contacted me, he did that because the pilots were British.  I would only know that if I had actually spoken to the Air Traffic Controller that guided them through restricted airspace to land and offload their gold again at a CIA Base and you know that if you read the book.(1.20:39)

(1.21.50) I am here to tell you that there were not 19 Arab hijackers.  There were crew members and quote-unquote handlers like the guy on Flight 11 that was in 9B who was a Sayeret Mat’kal which is like the Jack Powers of the Israeli Mossad. Special Operations, trained assassins, trained anti-hijacking specialist and how in the world could he get killed by a plastic box cutter by the two guys both behind him according to the official story-they were five foot six and 128 pounds.(1.22.19)

Tracking the Leopard Meroz commentsIs Rebekah Roth for real?  Based on anecdotal conversations, and so called expert witnesses which we are not allowed to cross-examine, she concludes that the CIA actively recruited pilots and airline attendants solely on the basis that they had a great cover job. There are multitude numbers of great cover jobs, where CIA agents would never even have to show up for work, that would fool those meddling neighbors.  And what is her proof that she gives for asserting that three nations, maybe four, were involved in orchestrating the events on 9/11?

Some years ago I was a bank Trust Department Auditor and Officer.  When we audited a department, usually we took over the closest conference room.  However, if the department under audit had an empty desk, I would choose that work area over the conference room, as I liked to overhear the office gossip.  My co-workers used to give me a bad time, telling me that office gossip was hearsay, and what we needed was documented proof.  Exactly. I agreed totally with that; however, I had found that often office gossip and complaints gave vital clues as to what documentation ought to be reviewed in order to see if a procedural correction was needed.  

So I have no problem with anyone in the 9/11 Truth Movement discussing hearsay, as long as they are not inventing fake witnesses.  However, I do have a problem with such persons as Rebekah Roth who claims to have real expert witnesses looking at real evidence, yet this real evidence is withheld, and we are directed to read her fictional account so that we can experience her emotional reactions when this supposed evidence was reviewed by these supposed experts. 

The events on 9/11 represented a crime scene, and the withholding of real evidence and the testimony of real witnesses is tantamount to perverting the course of justice. 

Why should we respect the anecdotal assertions of  Rebekah Roth  who, for example, claims  that some Pentagon guy thinks she should testify before a Congressional Hearing, which may never come to pass in reality?   Whatever documentation she has which backs up her theories should be put out in public view.  It is outrageous when the public is told, “buy my book” and we are expected to distinguish between fiction and reality, based on what?  Hearsay which may represent the stories of a  fictitious witness?

TROLL ATTACKS?   Or as Rebekah Roth quotes in her Methodical Illusion book: “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize”. Voltaire

Doug Hagmann:  (1.33.33)  You’re getting a lot of push back, aren’t you?

Rebekah Roth:  Yes, I was extremely attacked by some trolls, some of which I later on found out, ah, are involved in Scientology. (laughing) (UI) he actually got some kind of web page but I had no idea, I never spent time on the internet really so I didn’t know trolls exist, I didn’t know what that was all about.  And oh you know what’s happened is so many people that were with DARPA in military intelligence, in air traffic control, pilots, flight attendants, pursers, so many of them came forward and helped me get the research done that  couldn’t have done without them. Ah, forward to Methodical Conclusion that there are so many of them that the trolls really mean nothing.  These are people that are jealous maybe because my radio audiences are huge uh and you know my book success was huge.  My first book went to #9 out of 8 and a half million on Amazon…..

(1.36.15)  Social Media is DARPA and CIA…(1.36.55) I thought the NSA was going to get me.  I thought they were going to kill me.

Tracking The Leopard Meroz comments:  Below is a link to Rebekah Roth’s page on who she considers to be the trolls who have attacked her. I do not locate anywhere where she has addressed the genuine concerns of those who have legitimately inquired into her background.  Some of her comments on this page seem hypocritical, since she panders to speculative theories on 9/11, and does so for a personal profit.  RebekahRoth.com/trolls

Rebekah Roth believes the passengers were gassed to death, and she puts this detail in her book after receiving a sign from God at a gas station.

Joe Hagmann: (1.37.44) …..We have over 3 emails asking “What happened to the people?”

Rebekah Roth: (1.37:51)  It’s in actually the last five chapters.  What I was telling you before when I was working with an air traffic controller, we actually found a, a FOIA Freedom of Information Act data that I found on a the internet actually.  It wasn’t one I had in all of my terabytes stuff.  And um we were reading through it together and it’s one of those last five-last three chapters and that’s the part I wasn’t sure I wanted to put in-well here’s the thing.  I was travelling with my husband and I had this and I was ready to end the book.  Do I want to put this detail in because this is what happened to the passengers.  After what happened to them at Westover, how they were uh most likely gassed and now that’s kind of the conclusion most everybody has come to- they used some sort of gas and the pepper spray or mace was a much stronger than that but they had the bodies, and what did they do with the bodies?  That, as well as the getaway plane- I’m giving away a lot of it.

Doug Hagmann:  Yeah.  You don’t have to go too far into that because it’s- the way you put it together it’s–WOW! (1.39:06)

Rebekah Roth:  And also this book is different….( 1.39:23)There’s all kinds of different stuff in there but when I said to my husband I don’t know if I want to put this detail that you’re asking me about in this book,  I’m afraid this is so mind blowing because I was really- I mean I found out about maybe ten days before-it was a detail I just didn’t know if I should put it in and so he was putting gas in the car and he never grabs his receipt but because we were traveling he grabbed the receipt and I kid you not.  The total and he just wanted to put a squirt in because we were going to go to a Costco or someplace and get gas in the morning before we left our location.  Nine dollars and eleven cents and he literally said to me, “that Guy up there wants you to put it in the book!”, so I said that would be it.  God has it.  Because since I started Methodical Illusion the uh it’s hard to explain this, the spiritual aspect of my life and that’s why people ask me, aren’t you afraid?  Well, I had all those proxy servers set up so people think I’m in Langley, Virginia, or they think I’m somewhere else.  I’m always four states away from where ever I’m pinging from.  But I thought it was for the NSA, so all the conspiracy nuts put all these conspiracies together about me, but really, I’m just a grandmother of eight, mother of five……(1.40:48)

The Reason for it all……

Rebekah Roth:  (1.43.53)  I died when I was fifteen.  Now I know why I came back.  Because I see puzzles and put them together….

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operation COFFEE, TEA, OR ME?

After taking a two month reprieve from the world of Christian Alternative Media,  I have decided to explore the world of 9/11 Truth-tellers. It has been many years since I have gone through the internet articles on this subject,  but as I recall,  everyone, no matter what theories they present,  considers themselves to be part of a “Truth” movement.

The September 11, 2001 attack on American economic and military iconic structures represented layer upon layer of criminal acts involving treason, murder, property destruction, guile and the mockery of justice and judgment.  The complexity of events on that day reflect a sort of mad genius as it affected the three levels of our world: the physical, the spiritual realm, and that of the human soul, itself. In the world of the occult sorcerer, this type of mastery is rewarded with a Triple Golden Crown representing the rulership of those three levels.  In truth, however, what was planned and executed was nothing to boast of, but represented the evil machinations of a coordinated group deserving of justice and a severe judgment.

I am going to start my 9/11 journey at the McGhee Tyson Airport, which is a public and military airport in Blount County, Tennessee. Why here?   Well, the first topic I want to consider involves Rebekah Roth and her radio co-host and husband, RamJet. And when I went to the internet to try to decipher what the letters in their self-publishing company, KTYS Media stood for, the only thing which popped up was the ICAO(International Civil Aviation Organization) airport code KTYS for the McGhee Tyson Airport. It is one of those odd coincidences, in that I have done several posts connected to this locality. But let us head on out from here to Las Vegas, Nevada where KTYS Media presumably had its start.

Michael Allen Harris AKA RamJet, radio co-host with Rebekah Roth

 

Rebekah Roth is the pen name of a woman who claims to have 30 years experience as an airline stewardess and international purser. She refuses to provide any proof, and says she worries about those nefarious three digit government agencies discovering her true identity.  As usual, they already know who she is and where she lives, and it is the rest of us who are left to search the net for clues.

Both husband and wife are fiction writers who have based their books on their personal experiences.  They self publish under the company,  KTYS Media.  I could not locate this business name in the Nevada Secretary of State business entity online records, even though this company claims it was located in Las Vegas. No one seems to know what KTYS stands for.

So since  we are about to take a flight of fancy involving the unprovable bona fides of Rebekah Roth’s airlines career, and her husband has a Facebook page called RamJet, which uses the aircraft photo above, let us see what KTYS Media is all about.

KTYS Media has designed their logo to highlight their name in a black, feminine script with a red heart motif supported by the letter Y. These letters are on a white background with a red border, overlaying a black background. Underneath, KTYSMedia claims to publish “Books that Invoke a Change of Heart or a Change of Mind“. The only book this website links to is  Methodical Illusion, written by Rebekah Roth with a publication date of November 3, 2014.

However, the website for KTYSMedia.com was created on January 22, 2010, almost 5 years earlier. On June 18, 2010 this Boutique Publishing House published a book called Windsweeping by Michael A. Harris.

The description of this novel at Amazon.com says, Windsweeping is driving a high performance vehicle with no particular destination in mind and absolutely no time constraint beckoning a return.  It is accomplished with a rather eclectic selection of music playing in the background as the experience evolves into the arena in which ideas are born, decisions are made and life is allowed to be filtered through an ambiance of solitude.  Following the death of his mentor, David Jarvis goes Windsweeping in an effort to put his life back into perspective.  Only this Windsweeping excursion isn’t like anything he has ever experienced.  Ultimately, he understands that men do not inherently know how to love and he welcomes an invitation to be taught all the dimensions of love by a woman whose gifts transcend time and space. Learning how to love others alters every aspect of David’s life and eventually leads him to recognize the woman of his dreams.  Windsweeping is a love story every woman will embrace, but it is written from a man’s perspective allowing all men everywhere to finally comprehend what the women in their lives have been trying to instill in them long before they were even born.

Michael Allen Harris AKA RAMJET,  the radio co-host of Rebekeh Roth, author of Methodical Illusion

In a video promoting his book, Michael Harris tries to display a casual sophistication which is appealing to women desperate to have a real conversation with a man. He does not appear to fit his image of himself as a macho RamJet;  however, he does manage to get 11 five star ratings from his eleven groupies on his Amazon.com book page.

In an article dated December 24, 2015, TruthRadioFrequency.com posted an expose by someone named Luckee 1 entitled, THIS IS TRUTH FREQUENCY! SCAMMERS WILL BE EXPOSED. The scammers are none other than Rebekah Roth and Michael A. Harris. This article reproduces a partial copy of an About Michael A. Harris page from freado.com/read/7572/windsweeping, which now cannot be found at the original site.

What was stated at freado.com about the author of Windsweeping is this: Michael grew up in the San Francisco bay area in the late sixties and early seventies.  He worked for a miniature golf course company through high school and during the summers in college.  That job allowed him to travel throughout California and Arizona and instilled in him a love for driving alone on long lonely stretches of road.  He holds a bachelors degree in Political Science and received an MBA from Arizona State.  Most of his career centered in the creation and development of software companies in the state of Washington.  He speaks fluent Finnish and would welcome any conversation in that unique language.  He is married to KoreAnn and has five grown children and a cat named CeeCee. His passion is to write and windsweep the rest of his life.

It appears that this is a second marriage for Michael Harris and for his present wife, KoreAnn, who had been previously married to an Iranian man. At some point the Harrises entered into a venture selling essential oils and had a website PhiXYourHealth.com which they created on March 14, 2013. They produced some videos to sell their products, displaying the photo shown above of Michael A. Harris and someone named Monika Gainor, who has the same voice as Rebekah Roth.

This same photo also is displayed elsewhere as representing KoreAnn Ashlie, who held a real estate broker license #79620 in Washington State which was first issued on Nov. 12, 2004 and expired Dec. 25, 2009.

After Rebekah Roth began promoting her 9/11 based novel Methodical Illusion via numerous Alternative Media radio hosts, some began to question her multiple identities and credentials. One of the best of these investigations was done by Kurt Richard Haskell who published this expose on his Facebook page.

In addition to exploring the question of whether Rebekeh Roth ever was an airline stewardess as she claims, Haskell takes the reader through his various findings on her many aliases. Kurt  Haskell makes an interesting observation about Michael Harris, the husband of Rebekah Roth AKA Monika Gainor AKA KoreAnn Ashlie/Harris AKA Sara, etc. etc. Windsweeping, as well as the Methodical Illusion series, are fiction based on the author’s real experiences, and we are left to our own devices trying to discern fiction from fact.

Haskell comments,  “Michael A. Harris talks about how he developed a software program to determine if people are lying by compiling all data related to them.  This sounds like something the CIA/NSA would do and by his own words the book is based on real events”.

Rebekah Roth makes reference in her first novel to her husband’s book Windsweeping and to the essential oils products they sold.   I cannot understand why she claims she is safeguarding the identity of her family by using a pen name, when she herself reveals verifiable links to her family.

There does not seem to be any proof that Rebekah Roth spent 30 years as an airline stewardess and international purser, although several persons have requested such information from her.   So if her bona fides are a figment of an active imagination, and she has a history of using multiple identities, perhaps all such data should be analyzed by her husband’s software program to determine if she fits the profile of a Liar.

In addition to writing 3 novels, Methodical Illusion (November 3, 2014), Methodical Deception (August 28, 2015), and Methodical Conclusion (July 12, 2016), Rebekah Roth offers subscriptions, the highest membership costing $75/year,  so that one can gain the “privilege” of going behind the scenes to her Behind The Galley Curtain where insider information, including daily morning news commentaries by her and RamJet can be heard.  These marketing geniuses have not only offered their 9/11 theories for a price, but they have priced the Kindle copy of her book at $9.11, which is certainly an indicator of the lighthearted approach they take to that infamous day of injustice.

Rebekah Roth was subject to several exposes by Alternative Media radio hosts and stations at the end of 2015, but here we are almost a year and a half later, and certain radio hosts still have her on their shows, without addressing the peculiarities of her personal story.

Who endorsed her first book in the beginning, lending credibility to the Rebekah Roth façade?  Why Douglas J. Hagmann and John B. Wells, of course. These two men are also known for coming to the aid of Mike Kerr AKA Mike Whitestone, who also had a reputational problem.  And then there was that promotion by these two radio hosts of that fraud known to most as V-the Guerrilla Economist.  The written endorsements, can be found at  readroth.com.As seen below in the second endorsement, an anonymous pilot gives is afraid to give his name.  What kind of endorsement is that? But the most interesting endorsement is the first one.This first endorsement is from Barbara Honegger, former White House Policy Analyst and Dept. of Defense Sr. Military Affairs Journalist 2000-2011.  Barbara Honegger has quite a long and distinguished career in the public eye. Here is a photo of Barbara Honegger as she gave a speech in recent years on 9/11 in Seattle.

Barbara Honneger speaking in Seattle on the events of 9/11

Rebekeh Roth on the April 7, 2017 Hagmann Report

When I compared the above two photos, I felt prompted to ask, has Rebekah Roth colored and styled her hair, chosen a similar red lipstick and a similar eye glass frame so that she looks like Barbara Honegger?  What happened to the blond Monika Gainor/ KoreAnn Ashlie look?  This woman is a Mistress of Disguises.  Perhaps she wants you to subconsciously place her on the same level of expertise as Barbara Honegger.  Rebekeh Roth hides her 9/11 theories in a fictional format, to exempt herself from footnotes and other research paper requirements, and refuses to provide evidence of her bona fides; yet she claims that she is a 9/11 expert.

On this flight of fancy, it appears we cannot get a decent cup of coffee or tea, only the “me” of a fictional stewardess story. Go read the “Look Inside” pages of Methodical Illusion at Amazon.com.  What you will find at the very beginning of this novel is a racy portrayal of the life of airline stewardesses and pilots.

In the next post I am going to review the  April 4, 2017 Hagmann Report video interview of Rebekah Roth, and listen to what she says.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The War Between Narcissists

In the recent child custody trial featuring Alex Jones and his ex-wife, a psychiatrist noted that Alex Jones fits the model known as a Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

During the coverage of that trial,  an April 19, 2017 Op-Ed piece was published at latimes.com entitled, Is Alex Jones an extreme conspiracy theorist or a giant troll?  Here’s why the answer matters.  The author, Ken White is a criminal defense attorney and 1st Amendment litigator at Brown, White & Osborn LLP in Los Angeles.

Ken White asks, “Is there a difference between the persona we offer to the world and the person we truly are? That question is as old as philosophy, poetry or adolescence.  But here’s a modern American twist:  What’s the legal difference between the personas we offer to the world and our true selves? This week, infamous conspiracy theorist Alex Jones has been exploring that subject in a Texas courtroom as he resists his ex-wife’s attempt to secure full custody of their children.” Click on the link in the prior paragraph to follow the author’s discussion of the question he has raised.

Matthew 12:34-37 says, O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things?  for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.  A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things:  and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.  But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.  For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.

The Christian Alternative Media has several radio hosts who assert that they are Truth-Tellers, and should their voices be silenced, truth will also be silenced. Does it matter what the character and heart of such men are,  who give their voices over to the airwaves of the Prince of the Power of the Air?

The Bible indicates that the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness (Romans 1:18).  There is a tipping point, a point of no return for many who mishandle the truth of salvation;  when such are turned over to Strong Delusion, by God himself (2 Thess. 2).

Presently, several Alternative Media radio hosts are claiming that Mainstream Media, politics, bloggers and others are trying to shut them down. Is there any real basis in fact for this complaint?  Or does the real problem lie within these men who have mishandled the facts and Truth itself, for narcissistic personal gain? Have they ever regarded the sound counsel of others as worthy of their attention?  Or does their I Phone have only one phone number on their speed dial, as the following cartoon so cleverly illustrates?

On April 30, 2017, Douglas J. Hagmann published an article called The War Against Truth and Truth-Tellers on his website HomelandSecurityUS.com.

Hagmann wrote, “On Friday, April 21, 2017, a female Michigan blogger and former Fox News contributor appeared on the Pat Campbell Show on KFAQ in Tulsa, Oklahoma.  In the wake of Bill Reilley’s departure from Fox, she made accusations suggestive of sexual harassment against Sean Hannity that reportedly happened over a decade ago.”

Because he also noted that she had made prior accusations of plagiarism, but refuses to state her name, we are forced to look beyond Hagmann’s article to discover that the person in question is none other than Debbie Schlussel  who had written an article on August 18, 2006, almost eleven years ago, entitled, UH-OH! Northwest “Intelligence” Network Steps In It:  Fake “Terrorism Expert” Douglas Hagmann Admits Plagiarism, Fabricated Info.

With regard to the Hannity story, according to heavy.com, “In an interview with LawNewz, Schlussel tried to clarify her story. She said Hannity never sexually harassed her, but she still thought the incident she described on April 21 was “weird”. “I would never accuse him of that.  Sexual harassment has a special meaning under the law, and I would never accuse him of that”, Schlussel told LawNewz….Sclussel also told the site that Hannity’s legal threats were “laughable”, adding that his claim that she’s a “serial harasser” is “defamatory”.  “Everything I said was true, and truth is an absolute bar to defamation.  He on the other hand has a murky record on truth,” Schlussel told LawNewz.

Heavy.com in the same article, also posted this copy of Hannity’s legal threats:Doug Hagmann uses this incident, which is of little concern to 99.99999% of Americans, to voice his own personal grievances.  He states, “Last Monday, Mr. Hannity opened his show with a strong rebuttal, denying her claims about this issue and others raised in the past, stating that he would respond with appropriate (and in my opinion, well-deserved) legal action.  He also stated, nearly verbatim, many of the same things I have been reporting on my radio show for the last year- that there are individuals who have been tasked with transcribing nearly every word spoken by the politically conservative hosts in the media (and many larger voices in the “alternative media”.)

He adds, “One might legitimately ask why someone would engage in such a mundane and tedious task.  There are multiple reasons for this, yet all lead to the same objective:  Silence and forever shut down conservative voices exposing the criminality and evil of the Progressive, Communist Left.”

“The process is to de-contextualize our statements and republish the content in such a manner that would simply but effectively impeach our credibility. Such is consistent with the Progressive’s use of the phrase “Fake News,” which has already become a tiresome moving target of meanings.”

He goes on to declare “Another purpose strikes at the heart of shutting down independent researchers whose only goal is to report the unvarnished truth:  to use such de-contextualized material as a weapon to dissuade potential sponsors and to “scare off” existing sponsors, thereby silencing the conservative voices by cutting off our revenue.”

I ask,  Doug Hagmann, please give us one detailed example for our readers where the transcription of your words were de-contextualized.

So while Douglas Hagmann is whimpering that he has drawn fire from “various bloggers, authors, detractors, disruptors, serial stalkers and litigants”, the very next day on May 1, 2017, Alex Jones published a short video extolling the virtues of being relentlessly attacked. These opposite positions are in fact two sides of the same coin.

I found it amusing that Alex Jones personally demonstrated to all viewers of his video, including the lawyers representing Chobani Yogurt, why their defamation damages are probably more extensive than even they imagined.

The title of this curious speech by Alex Jones was entitled Infowars Traffic Explodes Under MSM Attack, and can be located on the Alex Jones Channel at this link.

Here is a partial transcript of his argument:

There are people that believe Mainstream Media and believe the hype and there are people that don’t. (The screen shows INFOWARS.COM YOU ARE THE RESISTANCE!)

This morning I was talking with one of my friends and he said to me, he said, “Alex, man you’re-Infowars is going to be shut down soon!  Wow, your traffic’s down 85% and you don’t have any audience-everyone’s turning against you.”

And I asked him, I said, “Where’d you get that information?”

  He said, “Uh, I saw it on Infowars.com being spammed in the comments.” 

And I looked at my friend who I’ve known for more than a decade and I said, “Well, you know that’s part of a PR campaign of disinformation, right?” 

He looked at me and said, “Is it really?  I mean they attack you every day on every major news channel almost every night on the Late Night Shows, from Jimmy Kimmel to Stephen Colbert…you’re on CNN or MSNBC every night saying you’re Fake News, saying you’re a liar, saying you’re an actor, saying you’re a fraud, … how could you survive that?”

And I looked at him, I said, “We’re bigger than we’ve ever been.  We have more traffic, more people, more affiliates, more listeners and more revenue than Infowars has ever had in 22 years.”

And my friend looked at me like I was a liar and said, “We’ll see”.

And if you could understand that statement, you could understand everything in this world today.  There are people that believe Mainstream Media and believe the hype and there are people that don’t.  But if Mainstream Media can get enough people to believe something and get enough people to buy into it then it becomes self fulfilling prophecy.

I just got a call from a New York Times writer, a very prominent writer last night who wanted to talk with me, and I’ve known him for about 16-17 years, so I called him back, and they said later, “I don’t agree with your politics but it’s clear that about the yogurt lawsuit and the Democrats trying to get Pizzagate place to sue you, they’re in D.C. and the media saying you’re Fake News and the one sided coverage on your custody battle for your children, and all the major news channels attacking you that they’re trying to shut you down.”

And I said, “Do you think that I need to be shut down?” 

And they said, “No, if you stop bashing the Muslims who are nice peaceful people, you don’t need to be shut down.” 

“Oh, is that a message?”  And the person went silent.

So here’s what’s happening. 99% of people are followers.  Most people act like they’re leaders.  But a leader does what’s right, regardless of what happens to them individually, for the greater good of the species.  Now don’t get confused by that and think that means we’re collectivists-just give ourselves over to some slave master that directs us around for the greater good-we’re not a bee hive or an ant hill,- an ant colony.

But what I’m going through is no longer a microcosm, but it is on a smaller scale what’s happening to President Trump.  And it’s a Beta Test.  I’ve been picked for the Test.  The Test Pilot of the Globalists.  I don’t work for them-don’t like them, but they’ve chosen me as the Test Pilot.   I’m like the chimp that they’ve fired up into space to see what happens to me to test the News Wars. 

The Pentagon, the CIA, the Broadcast Board of Governors of the FCC having Congressional Meetings are saying “We’re gearing up to take out Alex Jones and other Fake News and we say we can do that because they work for the Russians.  So I’ve now been dehumanized, and I’m a foreign spy, see, with no evidence, no jury, never get to face my accuser, never get to respond to the news, don’t get to go before the Congress at a hearing.

They were calling real Reds in front of the House of Un-American Activities Committee.  Some were innocent, some weren’t but at least they got to face their accuser.  Not in the 1984 scenario of 2017.  So I’m a Russian spy they say.  I’m a racist.  I’m a homophobe.  You name it…I hate women.  You don’t see any proof of that- but they don’t care that’s what they say! 

And that’s the accepted Kosher politically correct thing to do whether it’s in a civil trial for your children, or whether it’s on the news-as you sit there and can’t talk and the Mainstream Media, the Rachel Maddows, the Colberts, the lawyers, whoever it is, they point at you and they say, “That’s a person that doesn’t think women should be able to be a judge, that’s a person that’s racist, that’s a person that’s in the KKK, that’s a person that’s a cult leader and brainwashes children.  That’s a person that’s BAD.  And they all point at you.  And they feel strong in the big collective of the corporate system of going along with that narrative-it’s very inviting, it’s very sexy, it’s very alluring to imagine you’re powerful through the power structure.  To imagine you’re powerful because here’s what’s happening. The followers are scared….(6.22)

(8.04) Alex Jones has everyone going after him, second only to Trump.

(8.19) I’m so glad they are attacking me everywhere, I’m so glad they are lying about me everywhere.  I’m so glad they’re moving heaven and earth to politically assassinate my character- because that means that I’ve dealt them with grievous blows, that means I’ve really counted in this life…(8.36) I wasn’t a third measure, or a tenth of a measure of a man.  I measured up to my ancestors.  I did what it took.  I didn’t back down. Victory or Death, like Colonel Travis at the Alamo.  And I’ll say that now, Victory or Death!! I’m the opposite of scared now. I am totally invigorated, empowered…..

This audio is almost 16 minutes, and later on Alex Jones sketches on a napkin the approximate graph given by Google Analytics which shows that at one time he had 40 million listeners, which rose to 80 million during the election, and has presently plateaued at 60 million.  (It is interesting to note that these figures would appear to differ from what I have been told are shown by another well known analytical company which credits Alex Jones with an audience of several million more persons.  I am unable to verify any of these figures, as this information is known to paid subscribers, and has not been displayed as proof.)

So here we have two major Alternative Radio Hosts with similar enemies; yet one is declaring that they are being taken out, and the other declares that they are prospering more than ever.

Do such men hold the corner on Truth?  Just because someone banters around facts and agreed upon assumptions, does not mean that they deserve to be exalted as super heroes of the Truth standing against the criminal corruptions of our American corporate and governmental institutions.

When it comes to the reporting of the news, there is such a thing as genuine, sound investigative reporting that researches facts and events to present a report that is of genuine benefit to our society at large. We need to reinstate those old fashioned standards of journalism which exemplified the best of Free Speech in this nation.

In the War between Narcissists, Truth is trampled under foot, and the candles of wisdom and understanding are blown out, leaving us all sitting in darkness, awaiting the next 911 style event with trepidation.

 

 

 

InfoMadness

The beginning of the words of his mouth is foolishness: and the end of his talk is mischievous madness.  Ecclesiastes 10:13

It has been two months since I have written anything on the Alternative Media, as I have left off tracking the leopard Meroz, and continued on down the ordinary path of my own life. In this short time slot, I cleaned out my garden beds of winter debris,  planted some flowers and azaleas, threw out piles of notes taken on Alternative Media radio hosts, and made the long  journey, by myself, to Scotland to visit my daughter, son-in-law and three grandchildren.

With this last adventure, I encountered many strangers from several nations, on 6 different airplanes, through 3 different airports, two Scottish trains, an Edinburgh city bus, and by car on one lane mountain roads with blind curves and steep cliffs. Scotland is noted for its ultra polite citizens, but I also observed that America’s general populace also retains much civility and humor as it goes about its daily business. After arriving back home, I picked strawberries from my garden and looked over my peach tree which now has lovely ripening fruit.

Then I opened my email account, and read a message sent to me on the subject of the defamation lawsuit just filed against Alex Jones by Hamdi Ulukaya, owner of the Chobani Yogurt Company.  I read the initial filing of this lawsuit, and then viewed these videotaped responses of the scowling Alex Jones to this action, linked here.

One cannot help but compare the inner disposition of Alex Jones, whom I term the InfoMadman, with the humble demeanors of the numerous strangers I had interacted with on my travels. But after all,  Alex Jones is the King of the Awakened Ones of the Alternative Media, whose  enlightened insights into government corruption, has granted him a self-defined sense of superiority, which has been reinforced over the years by a multi million dollar income. The rest of us by comparison are meant to bow down to the Awakened Ones’ merchandising of INFO, whatever that is.

Instead of addressing the simple facts of the defamation lawsuit, InfoMadman expands the story to imply, without proof, that George Soros is behind this latest attack to shut him down.  Appealing to every known interest, including the Christian versus Muslim arguments, he asks for support, both in listener loyalty and funds.  In one video Alex Jones, declares, I will stand, I will win, or I will die. One of the printed messages on the video screen is JOIN THE RESISTANCE, and he uses the language connected with the Messiah, by declaring his legal battle represents The Crucifixion of the Truth. If you view these videos which I have linked to in the paragraph above the photo, note the facial expressions, and hand gestures of Alex Jones,  which are a message in themselves, apart from his verbiage.

So what is this all about?  Well, on April 24, 2017, a defamation lawsuit was filed in the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for the County of Twin Falls, by the attorneys for the Plaintiff,  consisting of two law firms:  Deborah K. Kristensen of Givens, Pursley, LLP of Boise, Idaho and Mark J. MacDougall of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer and Feld, LLP, of Washington D.C.

The Plaintiff is Chobani, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned by Hamdi Ulukaya, which produces yogurt using a thousand employees in their plant in Twin Falls, Idaho.  The principal office of Chobani is located in Norwich, New York. The jurisdiction of this lawsuit is Twin Falls, Idaho due to the location of the Chobani production plant and the claim that the defendants “have transacted business within the State of Idaho and have committed tortious acts within the State of Idaho that have caused harm to the Plaintiff’s business”.

One of the most interesting aspects of this lawsuit is that the Plaintiff has requested a Jury Trial. Now should matters ever proceed to that level, and it could, if Alex Jones lives up to his I will win, or I will die proclamation, who sits on that jury will be crucial in this emotionally charged legal matter.

The attorneys for the Plaintiff in paragraph 8, under the subtitle, General Allegations provides the court with a spurious statement of their own in order to introduce the defendant Alex Jones.  They state, Defendant Alex Jones is no stranger to spurious statements.  He has claimed that the U.S. government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks and the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut.  The Southern Poverty Law Center described Mr. Jones as “almost certainly the most prolific conspiracy theorist in contemporary America,” Mr. Jones has now taken aim at Chobani and the Twin Falls community.

There are very large numbers of United States citizens who believe that the 9/11 attacks were planned by government insiders, thus they are in agreement with the Defendant.   So the attorneys for the Plaintiff have already planted a fist in a tar baby, which they will have difficulty extracting themselves from.  And they used a Southern Poverty Law Center quote which could have been easily  made by a more neutral observer? One has to wonder whether attorneys as a rule live in ivory towers which are so high, that they cannot grasp the opinions of ordinary American citizens who might be called upon for jury duty.

This lawsuit then goes on to detail the source of the defamatory statements first published on April 11, 2017 on InfoWars.com and “The Alex Jones Channel” of You tube featuring reporters David Knight and Lee Ann McAdoo.

Alex Jones in his videotaped response discussing this lawsuit, says that the attorneys had contacted him prior to the filing, in an attempt to get him to retract his reporting. He claims that he did alter one headline which he changed on his own sites; however, since there are other YouTube accounts which had picked up the first video, they did not show the corrections made. Jones then claims that the tactic of the attorneys was to continue to complain, using these other sites as evidence that he had not retracted the headline.

Obviously Jones could have provided proof of his demand letters to these other sites to either remove the video or to show the corrections. If Alex Jones is unaware as to how that is done, perhaps he should get some advice from his friend, Douglas J. Hagmann, who apparently is quite effective in monitoring his own copyrighted works. For example, see this link posted by John “the Birdman” Bryant.

As Alex Jones concentrates on refocusing his listeners from the simple details of this  legal action to his expanded assertion that it is actually George Soros who is behind the lawsuit against him, all relevant commentary recedes into the background. Reference is made to the general incidents of Muslims throughout the world, including Sweden, who the geographically ignorant might assume is right next door to Twin Falls, Idaho.  The InfoMadman claims that his InfoWars news group was not the original source of the stories in question, but that they had only reposted what others had already written.

As Alex Jones draws an ever widening spiral around the very distinct and narrow legal complaint which is cited in the lawsuit, we are left wondering, how will this matter end?  Since Alex Jones claims that behind this yogurt company’s lawsuit stands George Soros who is masterminding his takedown, are we to then wonder if there is another super rich powerhouse standing behind Alex Jones, for which Alex Jones is only the front piece in this Infowar?

There may be some truth to the speculation that if the axe is being applied to InfoMadman’s Tree, then perhaps the rest of the forest is also in danger of  being cut down to size.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Crowning Decree from The Double Heights of the Watchers: We Are Doubling Down On The Vengeance of The Tongue of Fire Against Our Hidden Enemies

And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell.  James 3:6

The underlying thesis of Tracking the Leopard Meroz is that the Numberers of the Names of God, and of , His unsearchable judgments, are under the bitter curse spoken of  in Judges 5:23, which says Curse ye Meroz, said the angel of the LORD, curse ye bitterly the inhabitants thereof, because they came not to the help of the LORD, to the help of the LORD against the mighty.  Over the past 17 years or so, I have talked with various levels of this elusive priesthood, in an effort to get them to repent. I believe the mission of Tracking the Leopard Meroz is finished, as I have recently talked with the last person that I needed to address. So what comes next?

Two years ago, yesterday, I began writing on some of the major players in the Christian Alternative Media, relying on their own publically sourced audios, videos, webpages, chat rooms, and forums on the internet. In future posts,  I will be summarizing the past two years of articles on the Alternative Media.  I do not  plan on writing new posts on this subject unless a significant change occurs in this arena.  The continuing redundancy of the subject matter of these radio hosts and their guests makes it unnecessary at this time to comment further.

I Corinthians 3:13 says that Every man’s work shall be made manifest:  for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man’s work of what sort it is. This scripture is the basis on which much of the cursing of the tongue of fire of that leopard Meroz is done against anyone who dares to question their work. Yet one has to wonder why these Balaams consider that their doings are exempt from the judgments of God. Perhaps deep in their heart, they do in fact fear it, and that is why the overwhelming message of the Alternative Media is that their listeners should  build underground bunkers to escape the coming fiery destruction of America by atomic bombs.

Christian Alternative Media is aptly described by Psalm 73:9, They set their mouth against the heavens, and their tongue walketh through the earth. This psalm was written thousands of years before the advent of internet radio; yet it seems to imply that voices were heard traveling over long distances, even in primitive times.

The starting point of my writing on the Christian Alternative Media  began when I heard a broadcast, and read an accompanying article,  on February 10, 2015, which publically exhibited the cursing of two named persons by two Watchmen. This act caught my attention and so I decided to observe the works of these self proclaimed anointed Watchmen of God.  Recently, on February 1, 2017, another curse was delivered by one of those same Watchmen, against unnamed persons on his Enemies List.

This radio host, who I will not name, because I have grown weary of his constant whimpering that he is the victim of all victims of this blog, has a close friend who shares his  persecution complex.  This other man, who is quick to return the curse of his fiery tongue against anyone who questions him, has lately fretted that a Cabal has been formed against him.  Being  a  notable conspiracy theorist, he has fallen into his own trap of failing to grasp reality.  The lawsuit he is presently fighting has only one Plaintiff, yet in the strong delusions which grip his thinking,  he imagines that he is fighting against a THEY, a  Cabal so elusive that even the supposed members of it have no clue of its existence.

I listened to the first half hour of the February 1st video where the public warning was delivered.   I am terming this peculiar rant, The Day before Goundhog Day, as my first impression was that a groundhog in Pennsylvania had come out of his underground  bunker a day early, saw his SHADOW, freaked out, and decided to fight back with the vengeance of a tongue of fire, giving  Notice to those on his Enemies List, that he would never back down, but would double down.  In making this declaration, the risk for this groundhog, is that he will either reap a gambler’s fortune, or incur a huge loss.

Now this radio host mentions at least twice, that he believes and is committed to the true God of the Holy Bible.  This is because he desires to throw the Book at his enemies. Probably the most puzzling aspect of this radio host’s  Enemies List is that someone like me,  who has little influence in this world,  would even be on it.   This radio host is reputed to have a listening audience of some 60 million (give or take a few million).  Now why would such a world renowned radio host waste a moment of his time to get incensed at a little blog like Tracking the Leopard Meroz, that on a great day gets 100 visitors?

Let’s do the math: 60,000,000 less 100 equals 59,999,900. Are you impressed by my far reaching fame yet?   Now if this radio host would insist that his devoted followers never visit this blog, I might find that my daily visitors might be reduced to say, 20 a day.

Now who is the one who is actually trying to shut down legitimate free speech?  Somehow the absurdity of all this reminds me of a story that Michael A. Hoffmann II, told in one of his essays on  page 73 of his book Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare (Independent History & Research copyright 2001).  Hoffman recounts a story of Saint Augustine, who “told of a pirate who was confronted by that mighty conqueror, Alexander the Great. How dare you molest the sea?  Alexander angrily asked the pirate. How dare you molest the whole world? the pirate replied. Because I do it with only a little ship, I am called a thief.  You doing it with a great navy are called an emperor.”

Now this analogy  better fits Lutheran Pastor Chris Rosebrough of Pirate Christian Radio, than me. If you have not listened to  Rosebrough, he has taken on the daunting task of analyzing the heresies of the false prophets and prophetesses of the Charismatic mega churches.  In my case all these two world renowned self-proclaimed anointed men of God would have to do is to write a  few comments on my blog in which they counter the evidence and the facts presented here which support my arguments. They have had two years to do so.  However, instead of addressing the issues, they resort to the ad hominem argument,  and now it appears that they are devising a strategy on how to destroy the persons which comprise their ever expanding  Enemies List.

On the  February 1, 2017 show, this radio host  put together a Collage Profile of his  unnamed enemies, slandering their characters, impugning motives, all the while trying to make his description discreet enough to confuse any big city lawyer. Then he declared,  You know I make this statement to put those enemies on notice.  I’m putting you on notice!  That we will not back down, but we will double down!  This last sentence he repeated 7 times in his message.  He also claimed, We didn’t draw first blood.  But we’re certainly going to respond in kind, and by orders of magnitude greater than any imagined;  later adding, If we must defend against you while exposing–we will do so with a vigor that will leave you in the outermost branch of your family tree trembling for generations.

Ok, so what he has pronounced to his enemies and also before the true God of the Holy Bible, exhibits all of the components of a curse based on Deuteronomy 29. In addition, this radio host used a Blackjack poker phrase called  Doubling Down, where the gambler doubles his bet, when he is confident of winning with the next card. However, this also increases the amount which the gambler could potentially lose.    The radio host boasts that he will be victorious, but I ask, are spiritual curses done in the name of God like a deck of cards which can be dealt out? 

This radio host has entered into a realm where he exhibits no  fear of God. Regarding the demeanor which he displayed in giving his Notice, Proverbs 21:24  observes, Proud and haughty scorner is his name who dealeth in proud wrath.  If one observes the hypocrisy with which this radio host deals with others,  the very real probability  is that the Return Blow of his curse will come back on his own  family tree, by orders of magnitude greater than any imagined.

So what is he betting on, that this will not occur? Psalm 12:4 describes the attitude of this radio host, with a rhetorical question:  Who have said, With our tongue will we prevail; our lips are our own: who is lord over us? This radio host believes he holds the trump card, in that he claims that he knows the skeletons buried in everyone else’s closet. Yet from what I have heard,  many know what is in his closet that is kept out of sight.  To stop the mouths of those who know him all too well, I am of the opinion that he has subtly woven into the profile of his Enemies List personal aspects of those  mercenaries, who have done the down and dirty work of this particular authority structure. Should that be the case, if the return blow of his curse should come back in his direction, his shield is that he has also carefully numbered his minions to receive the curse.

An example of this methodology can be found in 2 Samuel 11:14-17, where Uriah was set up to be destroyed by the return blow of the sin of David.  This angered the LORD, and because the sin of David was done in secret, the judgment of God was done in the open, in order to clear the LORD’s name which was blasphemed as a result.

But getting back to the idea of Deuteronomy 29 being used in curses by those Numberers of the Name of God, depending on the magnitude of the curse, magicians may use one verse or several out of this chapter, or perhaps a timed sequence of blasts,  like those demolition experts use to bring down a building.

Deuteronomy 29:20-23 says, The LORD will not spare him, but then the anger of the LORD and his jealousy shall smoke against that man, and all the curses that are written in this book shall lie upon him, and the LORD shall blot out his name from under heaven.  And the LORD shall separate him unto evil out of all the tribes of Israel, according to all the curses of the covenant that are written in this book of the law:  So that the generation to come of your children that shall rise up after you, and the stranger that shall come from a far land, shall say, when they see the plagues of that land, and the sicknesses which the LORD hath laid upon it; and that whole land thereof is brimstone, and salt, and  burning……..etc. 

Compare some of these elements with the radio host’s threats to destroy his enemies which he did not name, as if their names were blotted out from under heaven, and his promise to bring to light their skeletons in the closet, thus cursing their family members for generations. 

Now what would happen if the True God of the Holy Bible decides to show up to see what the shadowy numerical equivalent of his Name is threatening to do?  Balaam, in attempting to curse Israel, kept finding that his mouth was in fact made to bless that nation. Perhaps since this radio host boasts that he speaks Truth Unfiltered,  God may possibly take him at his word,  forcing him to speak the shocking truth of his own deeds, and those of his closest friends and family and fake insiders.

The problem for this particular radio host, and most likely for the Mossad and the CIA, as well,  is the heart of the question  Balaam posed in  Numbers 23:8, How shall I curse whom God hath not cursed? or how shall I defy, whom the LORD hath not defied? The occult answer is found in  the method of numbering the Names of God, whether it be the Tetragrammaton as found in Exodus 6:3, Psalm 83:18, Isaiah 2:2, and Isaiah 26:4; or that of Jesus Christ.   However, this approach to the Scriptures has numerous flaws, because it is a departure from the truth of God’s words and motives.

The iniquity of the numberer of the Name has a shadow referred to as Sudden Death, representing what happened in the garden of Eden when Eve was tempted by the serpent, and ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.  When Adam, as the father of mankind,  also ate of this forbidden fruit, death entered. This radio host who was the spokesman for not only himself, but also those who are in covenant with him, has thrown the Holy Bible at his enemies, and doubled down on the vengeance of the tongue of fire.  Shall not God search this out?  For he knoweth the secrets of the heart. (Psalm 44:21).

In this strange world of numerical equivalency, the vengeance of the tongue of fire is also the leopard king of fornication. One has to wonder in the case of the radio host, what did he see when viewing his shadow that frightened him so much?  Whatever that shadow represents,  instead of repenting and submitting to the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, what we are witnessing is an ever increasing stubbornness. I cannot see how this will end well for those who are complicit in the cursing of those persons who attempted to  expose the deceptions of the Christian Alternative Media which are weakening the body of Christ.

Job in his suffering, questioned the unsearchable judgments of God which were at the core of the fiery trial he was in. Yet he realized his own vileness at the point where the LORD answered  him personally.   Out of the whirlwind, the LORD confronted Job, saying, Gird up thy loins now like a man:  I will demand of thee, and declare thou unto me.  Wilt thou also disannul my judgment?  wilt thou condemn me, that thou mayest be righteous? (Job 40:7-8)

In verses 11-14 the LORD throws down this challenge:   Cast abroad the rage of thy wrath: and behold every one that is proud, and abase him.  Look on every one that is proud, and bring him low: and tread down the wicked in their place.  Hide them in the dust together:  and bind their faces in secret.  Then I will also confess unto thee that thine own right hand can save thee.

Is this radio host a better man than Job? What about all those persons who assisted him in the wording of this curse and with the praying of it?  These persons may discover that the days ahead might not go as well as what they expected. Will the Lord exempt them from the consequences and implications of these threats which were made in the name of the true God of the Holy Bible? As Romans 11:33 declares, O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God!  how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!  The Master of the Numbers is about to be assayed, perhaps in the same manner which he did to those who tried to warn him that the angel of the LORD was standing there with drawn sword to block his perverse ways.

Ezekiel 14:3-4 warns, Son of man, these men have set up their idols in their heart, and put the stumbling block of their iniquity before their face: should I be inquired of at all by them?  therefore speak unto them, and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Every man of the house of Israel that setteth up his idols in his heart, and putteth the stumblingblock of his iniquity before his face, and cometh to the prophet; I the LORD will answer him that cometh according to the multitude of his idols;”.

In conclusion, Isaiah 48:11 has the LORD declaring, For mine own sake, even mine own sake, will I do it:  for how should my name be polluted? and I will not  give my glory to another.  This is repeated in Isaiah 42:8, I am the LORD: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images.

God, who is the discerner and knower of the hearts of men, shall rightly judge the depths of this matter.