Who Shall Plead for Queen Tut?

Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?  Job 38:2

It was May 29, 2017, and in the twilight, in the evening, in the black and dark night (Pr. 7:9), the Watchers at SocialBlade.com observed a blip on the screen. Something is going on…a shipload of Subs has arrived in the YouTube Galaxy…it’s hovering over Jason Goodman’s New York apartment…!

It was May 29, 2017 and  the sudden arrival of 4,260 CrowdSource the TruthiCONS set off the Blip alert at the SocialBlade.com  console.

Then on June 4, 2017 alarm bells clanged as the Mother Ship which had been sighted overhead opened its doors and 207,210 zig zagging Rage Walkers descended…All humor aside, the statistical blip shown in the above screen shots is something to ponder.  At the end of April 2017, George Webb and Jason Goodman had joined together as a broadcast journalism team, and along with Patricia Negron, they began to look into the Seth Rich story. There were other stories swirling about this YouTube neighborhood at that time, so let’s narrow down our focus to the day prior to the June 14, 2017 shutting down of the Port of Charleston due to a false report from Deep Uranium to George Webb  and then to Jason Goodman, which became a public spectacle on YouTube.

So on June 13, 2017, Robert David Steele and George Webb met at a restaurant, and decided to do a spur of the moment live stream fundraiser on the Jason Goodman YouTube channel. According to Document 34 filed March 7, 2018 in the Robert David Steele lawsuit, one of those listeners of that fund-raiser just so happened to be Susan Lutzke (soon after, to become well-known as Queen Tut), who donated $25 to Steele’s nonprofit corporation,  Earth Intelligence Network.

Mr. Cati and the Shadow of Death

Also on June 13, 2017, Mr. Cati (pronounced cat-eye) was in a panic, thinking that he was a Targeted Individual by the Shadow of Death.  As a precautionary move, he  prepared a report called The CYA-To Whom It May Concern-Discussion, which was uploaded the next day on YouTube.

At the .23 mark, Mr. Cati says, “Have I got something for you. Now this report isn’t your typical Mr. Cati report, but it is a report that’s of importance to many of you who are currently confused about many of the things that are going on involving George Webb, Jason Goodman, Dave Acton, Montagraph, Lift the Veil, Defango, all with regard to the Seth Rich investigation and many, even Trish Negron- these people have all been involved in the previous days recently, leading up to today in events that have set certain actions in motion, and since those actions that have been placed into motion are dangerous, I’m going to do this report as a living testimony to leave a record of how these events transpired, because should I die in the immediate future, and I’m going to tell you why…”.

(2.44)  “I believe the Shadow of Death was supposed to visit me today and because it didn’t, I need to explain some things and leave a video record should something happen.”  At the 23.42 mark, after Mr. Cati has given all of the excruciating details of the previous days, and stated his disclaimers, he says that he believes that Jason Goodman’s angry tirade against Defango might have been inspired by the comment which Mr. Cati had posted on Montagraph’s video…

Ahhh, well, Mr. Cati is still around, and so is George Webb who Mr. Cati thought was going to be done in soon after.  Those were strange days, but as I looked around this particular YouTube neighborhood back then, it was not difficult to see the legal problems developing which have resulted in two federal civil lawsuits against Jason Goodman.

Against that backdrop, the focus of today’s article is the anonymous handle, Queen Tut, which was originally created by Jason Goodman to hide the identity of Susan Lutzke, whose research on Robert David Steele was highlighted on Crowdsource the Truth. As a result of those public reports and commentary, Queen Tut, Jason Goodman and Patricia Negron found themselves facing a defamation lawsuit.

Two months ago on September 9, 2018,  an entry of default was entered against Susan Lutzke because she declined to answer the civil complaint against her. Her rationale for this was stated in February 2018, when her Queen Tut handle explained, “…because you never take a stand against deception, what you have to do is move around deception.  You have to beat them at their own game.”

In an article I wrote on September 29, 2017, I analyzed a Trello board which Queen Tut  displayed to back up an assertion which she had made against Robert David Steele. If you want to see one of the methods by which she creates a credible looking dissimulation, you might want to read that article. I am not a fan of Robert David Steele’s political, philosophical and religious opinions, yet Queen Tut’s underhanded method of “proving” her unfounded claim, placed me in the position of having to publicly take a stand on behalf of Steele.

One must remember that shortly after Susan Lutzke donated money to Robert David Steele’s nonprofit corporation, she turned against Steele to publicly revile him, in concert with Jason Goodman.  So in essence, Lutzke was an inside operator in this whole peculiar drama.

Recently, under the guise of a different anonymous handle, “Albert of Finland”,  Lutzke had the nerve to mock one of my readers, asking him if the name he commented under was his real name.  It is, and I know his credentials.  She also accusingly asked him, “How come you never talk about the rogue CIA Double Agent RDS…? This she asks, when she herself likes to play both sides of the fence. Susan Lutzke continually promotes unproven accusations while hiding behind various internet handles.  She most definitely is not the “persecuted, revealer of truth” which she claims to be.

On September 16, 2018, I wrote an article entitled, THE OATH Above All Oaths of Robert David Steele, Chief Counsel for the International Tribunal for Natural Justice.  12 comments have been left on that post, and in today’s article I am going to address just one of them, by De Vivas.  De Vivas replied to a comment by Queen Tut, and she stated, “I have communicated with Queen Tut a number of times”, and ends by saying “I salute you Queen Tut”. Since De Vivas is another anonymous handle emanating from the same IP address as Queen Tut, it would seem that Susan Lutzke enjoys talking to herself in her imaginary world.

Using one IP address, comments have been left on this blog under eight different anonymous names:  De Vivas, Albert of Finland, Bissel (Chief Counsel RDS), Harris, Ha Ji Won, Grace, Queen Tut and Avery.  I do not mind readers using anonymous names, so long as it is not used as a cover for libel, or to manipulate facts in order to promote a false narrative. On my Contact page, I state, I welcome any comments, even those which disagree with me, as long as you sincerely explain your position.”

Because Tracking the Leopard Meroz is my website, let this serve as notice that I will not allow my blog to  be taken over by disingenuous covert manipulators operating in the comment section. I encourage critical thinking based on facts and evidence. Speculations and conclusions, especially when made by anonymous handles, which have no factual basis, and are promoted for the sole purpose of denigrating  responsible persons who write under their real name, are not welcome here.

With that said, here is the De Vivas comment under discussion today:   In response to De Vivas’ desire that this blog write an expose on attorney Biss, I replied that I had already addressed him (regarding his disciplinary actions) in a September  2017 article on Robert David Steele, called Operation WHIPLASH.

The Queen Tut Summons issue can be divided into two timelines:  the initial Complaint filed on September 1, 2017 against Queen Tut/ Carla Howell, and the Amended Complaint filed  April 13, 2018 against Queen Tut/Susan Lutzke.  So let’s go through the applicable documents, one by one.

I. On September 1, 2017 Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network became plaintiffs in a federal defamation lawsuit against three defendants:  Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron, and Queen Tut, a person believed to be known as Carla A. Howell. Steven S. Biss (VSB #32972) of Charlottesville, Virginia is counsel for the plaintiffs.

II.  The original 37 page complaint was for $15,350,000 in damages. In the introduction, the complaint explained, “This is not a case about First Amendment or protected speech.  This is a case about the conscious and deliberate destruction of a man’s untarnished name and impeccable reputation by social media vigilantes and trolls.  The Defendants are the poster children of actual malice – stalking the Plaintiffs on the Internet, publishing and republishing videos and enticing their subscribers and confederates to make and publish false and defamatory statements, all calculated to injure the Plaintiff’s reputation and business.”

III.  On page 8 sec. 7, under Parties, the Defendant, “Queen Tut”, is described as a person believed to be Carla A. Howell of New Jersey who is a political activist. The Complaint references a Wikipedia page for Howell, but does not provide insight into why Steele thought she was Queen Tut.  We are left to speculate that perhaps Steele and Howell were in opposition to each other through their Libertarian Party association in the past. The description of Howell goes on to declare,   “At all times relevant to this action, Queen Tut acted in concert with and as an agent, alter ego or instrumentality of Goodman and Negron.” I note that the complaint states that “Goodman and Negron are sophisticated high net worth individuals who have sufficient assets and net worth to pay punitive damages in the maximum amount permitted under Virginia law”. No mention is given with regard to the net worth of Carla A. Howell.

IV.  The next reference in the court docket to Queen Tut is Document 5 filed September 8, 2017. In this entry, which is 7 days after the initial complaint was filed, the document represents a Proposed Summons to Queen Tut a/k/a Susan A. Lutzke of Fort Collins, CO.  On the same day, Document 6 reflects that 3 summons were issued as to the defendants, including Queen Tut a/k/a Susan A. Lutzke. Also on the same day Document 7 was filed for a proposed summons for Queen Tut a/k/a Carla Howell of Moorestown, NJ. This was followed by a Summons being issued in Document 10 on September 12, 2017 for Queen Tut a/k/a Carla Howell.

Thus within the first week of this lawsuit being filed in federal court, the Plaintiff has identified two different persons as the defendant Queen Tut. But only one of them has been officially declared as a party to the lawsuit, and that is Carla Howell. At that time, the lawsuit had not named Queen Tut a/k/a Susan A. Lutzke as a party to the lawsuit; thus it was improper to issue a summons against Lutzke.

Anyone who has listened to the Queen Tut interviews on Jason Goodman’s YouTube channel knows that there was only one very distinctive voice behind this anonymous persona. Thus, it would be highly improbable that there could be two different women posing as Queen Tut.

V. On November 2, 2017,  Document 18 is entered on the docket as “Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Queen Tut”. A letter dated November 1, 2017 is attached from Steven S. Biss’ office to the U. S. District Court Clerk stating, “Enclosed is the Summon and Proof of Service of the Summons and Complaint upon defendant, Queen Tut c/o Carla Howell, which I am returning “Unexecuted” because we have determined through additional research that the person calling herself “Queen Tut” is Susan A. Lutzke.

Note that this letter to the court is dated almost 8 weeks after the September 8, 2017 Document 5 was submitted which first named Queen Tut as Susan A. Lutzke. In this period of time, the Plaintiff and his Counsel did not add Lutzke as a party to this lawsuit, nor did they terminate Carla A. Howell as a defendant.

Next we see Document 19 dated November 6, 2017 “Summons Returned Executed” stating Queen Tut had been served on October 25, 2017 and answer was due November 15, 2017. An Affidavit of Service is attached claiming that documents were left at the door of an address claimed to be the abode of Susan A. Lutzke. At this point we must note that the Summons In A Civil Action to Lutzke contains a false statement, as it begins, “A lawsuit has been filed against you.” That statement is false as Lutzke was not a named defendant in this lawsuit at that point in time; it was Carla A. Howell who was the person identified on the lawsuit as Queen Tut.

VI.  90 days after it was claimed that Susan A. Lutzke was served with a summons, Document 30 dated January 23, 2018 is a Request for Entry of Default as to “Queen Tut” a/k/a Susan A. Lutzke by Earth Intelligence Network and Robert David Steele.  In this 7 page document, several claims are made, including that Lutzke was duly served in accordance with Virginia Code. Further, the Plaintiffs complain that after the September 1, 2017 complaint that “defendant’s Lutzke and Goodman continued to publish false and defamatory statements”…and display a video where they discuss the Summons…and the service of process.

On page 4 of Document 30, the plaintiffs complain that “Goodman and Lutzke call Plaintiff’s Complaint “a fake lawsuit from a real idiot”. Then counsel proceeds to delineate a timeline of events to conclude that Lutzke has not answered or otherwise responded to Plaintiffs’ Complaint…therefore she is in default.  As we have noted, in agreement with our commenter De Vivas, Susan Lutzke’s name was not even on the lawsuit, and she was therefore not under a legal responsibility to respond.

VII.  Next we enter into the Twilight Zone of this lawsuit when a  letter was received as Document 31 on February 21, 2018 from Mercia Francis who claimed to be writing on behalf of her mother Queen Tut. This letter provides a birth certificate for a woman born in 1937 who does not live in Colorado, and stating that Queen Tut does not want to give her address because she is fearful that Robert David Steele as a former CIA man, might send someone to harm her.

Document 32 filed February 23, 2018 by Steven S. Biss is a letter addressed to the Judge, the Hon. M. Hannah Lauck, regarding the Mercia Francis letter. He addresses his uneventful research into the identity of Mercia Francis, and observes that Susan A. Lutzke does not suffer from dementia.  Biss documents that Lutzke as Queen Tut has set up a Twitter account.  Some of the images shown have Queen Tut referring to Robert David Steele as “the greatest plagiarizer and liar on the internet”, etc.

Document 33 filed March 1, 2018 represents a second letter from Mercia Francis on behalf of her mother, Queen Tut.  She has included 2 documents which she wants filed with the court which include a statement from the owner of the property where the summons had been served on Lutzke, plus Robert David Steele’s article called, How the Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics.  Document 34 is a letter filed on the court docket by the plaintiff and counsel in response to letters 31 and 33.

VIII. Thankfully, on March 9, 2018 in Document 35, United States District Judge M. Hannah Lauck issued an Order addressing the several issues which we have been observing in this lawsuit. Judge Lauck explains Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 (a) to the plaintiffs, noting that their complaint “does not identify Lutzke as a defendant.” She concludes therefore that, “Lutzke is not ‘a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought,’ and entry of default is not appropriate. Fed. R. Civ. p. 55(a).  Accordingly, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Motion for Entry of Default.”

The Order does not speculate as to why attorney Biss failed to change the identity of Queen Tut to Susan Lutzke on the lawsuit once he became convinced that Carla Howell was misidentified as a defendant. This negligence on the part of seasoned attorney Biss is disturbing, and I do not know if Carla Howell had contacted Biss or the Court about this misidentification.  Since Queen Tut, in a Jason Goodman broadcast, had once claimed that she had called Ms. Howell, it would appear that Howell had become aware of the accusations which had been made against her.  This error continued for almost eight months before it was corrected on the court docket!

In addition, the Hon. Judge Lauck notes that the Court has received two documents submitted anonymously, explaining that “the Court will not accept documents sent anonymously and in violation of the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure, which govern parties -and nonparties- in an action.” It was ordered that these documents remain on the record, but not accessible to the public.”  She noted in footnote 2 that the Court was concerned that docket numbers 31 and 33 contain internal inconsistencies suggesting that they were not filed in good faith.  The Court also restricted 32 and 34 as “Court Only”, as they represent the responses of attorney Biss to the anonymous claims.

The Judge probably “set aside” as Court Only documents, the Mercia Francis letters and the Plaintiff’s response, so that this case could proceed forward. At some point in the future, these documents may be inserted into the proceedings, if necessary. Although these documents cannot be presently downloaded on PACER, the Judge closed the barn door after the horse was let out.  Both this blog, and that of Steele’s had published or referred to those now hidden from public view documents.

IX.  On April 13, 2018 an Amended Complaint (rds 413 2018 doc 39)  was filed which added Susan A. Lutzke a/k/a Queen Tut as a defendant, and upped the damages another $3 million, on top of the original $15 plus million.   Carla Howell’s name was terminated as a party in this lawsuit on April 19, 2018.

Documents 40, 41 regard a new summons to Susan Lutzke at a new address in Fort Collins, CO. Affidavit of Service was shown in Document 61 on July 25, 2018. Document 64-1 filed on August 21, 2018 represents a letter send via email and regular mail to Susan Lutzke stating she had been served with process, and noting the videos which demonstrated that she had “actual knowledge of the pendency of the lawsuit”.  The rest of the letter discusses the continuing efforts of Queen Tut to “disparage and defame” the Plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs entered a motion for entry of default against defendant, Susan A. Lutzke a/k/a “Queen Tut”. This was granted in Document 66 on September 6, 2018.

X.  In conclusion, Susan A. Lutzke was, in the end, properly served with the Robert David Steele lawsuit.  She chose not to respond to the complaint in regard to her own words and actions, despite the fact that the Carla Howell error allowed her an extra eight months to respond to the complaint. Since the other two defendants were properly served in the beginning, they had less time than Queen Tut did, to answer the complaint against them.

In regard to Susan Lutzke’s self imposed martyrdom, one cannot complain about due process while at the same time actively evading the means which our nation’s laws provide for a defendant to respond with a written, reasoned, orderly argument regarding a plaintiff’s complaint.

I am not an attorney, so I am just guessing that one of the reasons for the time delay in the Judge addressing Negron’s motion to dismiss, might be that it has taken months for  Queen Tut aka Susan Lutzke to demonstrate that she was not going to plead her case in court. Although each defendant must answer for his/her words and actions individually, it must be noted that in this lawsuit triple damages were requested because the Plaintiff is treating them as a “unit” acting in concert with one another.  I am speculating that the Judge would want to have all 3 defendants submit their pleadings prior to her considering how this lawsuit should proceed.

Susan Lutzke is an extroverted person who is comfortable speaking in public, and she claims to be a researcher. The title of this article asks, Who shall plead for Queen Tut? Queen Tut was created by Lutzke and Jason Goodman to act as a kind of golem to avenge them of an adversary. The problem for Lutzke is that her fictional cover has been exposed, and she is legally accountable for the words spoken by her internet handle. She could have pleaded her case in court, presenting evidence and speaking the truth, as a pro se defendant.

However, the federal court system has procedures for evidence and sanctions for perjury.  Perhaps the creator of Queen Tut does not want a piercing light to shine on her words and actions.

UPDATE (listen with discernment, but interesting discussion):  Steve Outtrim interview of Queen Tut 11/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

THE OATH Above All Oaths of Robert David Steele, Chief Counsel for the International Tribunal for Natural Justice

Show the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that ye are gods:  yea, do good, or do evil, that we may be dismayed, and behold it together.  Isaiah 41:23

Chief Counsel Robert David Steele at the 4/2018 Westminster Seatings of ITNJ

Robert David Steele, in an April 2018 Westminster Seatings video for the ITNJ stated at the 2.20 mark, “I have been a spy, I am out from under cover.  I’m under a lifetime secrecy agreement…”. This statement about his obligations to the CIA was made as he sat as the Chief Counsel for the International Tribunal for Natural Justice. 

As a signatory to the ITNJ Constitution, Steele has approved Article 7 (2) that  By affirming an oath in accordance with the present Article, Judges and Officers acknowledge that said oath shall take precedence over any and all other oaths or commitments that the Judge or Officer in question may have made to any other court or government or professional body or private association.

This raises the question as to whether the ITNJ Oath of Office takes precedence over Robert David Steele’s CIA secrecy oath.

Also, we must consider whether this same oath takes precedence over U. S. perjury laws which are a foundational safeguard in court proceedings. As we know, Robert David Steele and his non-profit organization Earth Intelligence Network are the plaintiffs in a United States federal civil lawsuit.

Why would anyone take such a loyalty oath to ITNJ,  a legally problematic international tribunal which had its beginnings rooted in Sovereign Citizen legal theories?

The last time I was observing Robert David Steele, he had been entertaining great visions of reforming the United States of America on multiple levels. After the last Presidential election, Steele’s visions were ignored by Trump who refused to meet with him. In an interview with Joseph Ford Cotto in June of 2017, Steele had shared several of his great plans, and number 3 on his list involved the CIA and his desire to be the head honcho of their operations, as shown in this screenshot.After the election, the CIA waited nervously to see if President Trump would give Robert David Steele the time of day. One can imagine that CIA coffee breaks featured coins being tossed in the air to decide who would be the winners comprising the 50% who were fired, or  the losers who would have to implement Robert David Steele’s grandiose visions. No doubt, a collective sigh of relief was heard in the heavens when Trump rebuffed  Steele.

Here is what Robert David Steele had discussed with Benjamin Fulford in Japan, as noted in my A Man Called Sue article on March 21, 2018:It appears that Robert David Steele has been sidetracked from the Benjamin Fulford visionary intersection, and has been working on his alliance with former rock musician Sacha Stone, founder of the International Tribunal for Natural Justice.

Finger prints of the gods

The Claims of the Living blog has documented in a series of articles, the beginnings of the legal and operational foundations of ITNJ, prior to the American team, led by Rebecca Cope, being ousted by Sacha Stone. Cope is an advocate for the sovereign citizen theories promoted by a self-proclaimed “Judge” in Alaska, named Anna Von Reitz.  Visual signs which serve to identify the practitioners of Sovereign Citizen ideology can be seen in the photograph below of  blood-red fingerprints beside several signatory names to the ITNJ Constitution. The Robert David Steele defamation lawsuit in U. S. district court 

On September 1, 2017 Robert David Steele and his non-profit Earth Intelligence Network filed a $15,350,000 defamation lawsuit against Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron, and Queen Tut, a woman believed to be known as Carla A. Howell. This lawsuit was amended on April 13, 2018 in document 39.  One of the changes was that Queen Tut was declared to be Susan A. Lutzke, the damages were increased by 3 million dollars, more recent defamation evidence was introduced, and the following addition to the Plaintiff’s work history and accomplishments was introduced to counter a new accusation made by defendants:

What is misleading about the title of Chief Counsel, is that in the case of Robert David Steele, he is neither an attorney, nor a legal scholar. And when it came time for him to file a federal civil court lawsuit, he hired attorney Steven S. Biss who has been disciplined by the Virginia Bar to represent him, rather than trying to impress the federal judge with his fake title.

The same persons seen during the #UNRIG campaign are found connected to ITNJ

As we take a look at Steele’s Chief Counsel position at the International Tribunal for Natural Justice, three other names show up in the history of this organization that I am familiar with.  Robert David Steele would also be familiar with the writings of Anna Von Reitz, as her name was referenced in his own blog, and in addition, he has been interviewed by Victurus Libertas who promotes sovereign citizen ideology, including that of Anna Von Reitz. As shown here in an official International Tribunal for Natural Justice (ITNJ) photo we also see Cynthia McKinney who helped to promote Steele’s #UNRIG election reform efforts,  and also  Youtuber, David Seaman who played an important part in pushing the fake Pizzagate scandal.

Note the prominence of Cynthia McKinney of #UNRIG election reform days when she became noted for going cross-country with Steele in a tax exempt plastic wrapped RV.  George Webb declined Steele’s invitation to be chief recorder of that event, and so now David Seaman is the exalted investigative reporter at ITNJ,  known for being on the forefront of the fake Pizzagate story which involved undocumented accusations of pedophilia.

One of the arguments which Rebecca Cope had set forth was that she did not want an  ITNJ requirement that judges must have legal qualifications from existing recognized institutions.  It was her desire to allow “special individuals”, such as the self-educated and self-proclaimed “Judge”  Anna Von Reitz, to be appointed as one of ITNJ’s judges. Note that presently ITNJ had no problem granting non-attorney Robert David Steele the title of Chief Counsel, allowing him to have an appearance of expertise and authority while adorned in a black robe during their formal meetings.

The ITNJ Constitution has loop holes to accommodate the indiscretions of its Chief Justice

Presiding ITNJ Chief Justice Sir John Walsh of Brannaugh has engaged in numerous eyebrow raising activities, including creating Greenwich University which failed to meet Australian academic standards and for which he appointed a convicted fraudster as chancellor.  A UK website,  Hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com, in their April 11, 2018 article written by El Coyote, titled  ITNJ ‘Chief Justice’ stripped of ability to practice law, extensively documents John Walsh’s Australian barrister history which caused him to be a focal point in a Senate inquiry.

Perhaps this is the reason why the ITNJ Constitution removed the words “I swear” from their Oath of Office, preferring the more nebulous wording of “I affirm”. The following comment given in an Australian Senate committee meeting regarding the perjury of Sir John Walsh may have influenced that choice of wording. Despite all this backdrop of ITNJ shenanigans, when it came to Robert David Steele’s federal civil court Amended Complaint, he complained that, “Defendant’s exhibit nothing but scorn for the Plaintiffs and the legal system.  They call this action a ‘fake lawsuit’.” 

Presumably, the Plaintiff thinks he is respectful of the United States federal court system by which he seeks a legal resolution of his complaint, despite his own questionable association with antigovernment sovereign citizen legal theorists. 

Practitioners of sovereign citizen legal theories often include incarcerated felons and vexatious litigants who have caught the attention of the judicial system with their paper terrorism as well as the watchful eye of  FBI investigators, so perhaps Steele should not press this assertion too far.

ITNJ Symbolism as representing occult concepts and Roman Catholic images

Let’s look at the symbols employed for the ITNJ, and their meaning.

The Pinecone symbol is used by occultists to represent the pineal gland, or the THIRD EYE which was opened in Adam and Eve when they believed and obeyed the subtilty of the serpent in the garden of Eden. Genesis 3:5 quotes the serpent as saying, “For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” Elsewhere in the Bible these “gods” are also known as judges.

From a distance, the six-sided logo for the ITNJ has an intertwined snake look. Many have observed the ostentatious gold throne chair for  Chief Justice Sir John Walsh.

The Humanitad Free Press and the U. S. nonprofit Committee to Support the ITNJ (EIN 81-0804071 with principal officer Santiago Azpilueta of 17423 Spirit Lane SE, Yelm, WA) jointly publish an online magazine called The Sovereign Voice.  The ITNJ.org website provides this answer to a common question:Here is another symbol of ITNJ:

Where else do we find these two birds combined with a giant pine cone?  Here is a photo of the Fontana della Pigna, which is described in Wikipedia as “a former Roman fountain which now decorates a vast niche in the wall of the Vatican facing the Cortile della Pigna, located in Vatican City, in Rome, Italy.”

Paradoxical quandaries

Returning to our discussion of ITNJ Chief Counsel Robert David Steele, and his participation in the Westminster Seatings of April 16-18, 2018, a short video on the ITNJ YouTube channel can be viewed where Steele makes the following introductory remarks:

(1.20)…we have people in the United States of America that breed children in order to sell them and when they are sold, they come without birth certificates which means it’s easier to kill them and have no one ask where they are…

(1.36)…importing children by the plane load again children with no documentation…

(4.28) …the need to restore the sovereignty of We the People…

It seems the 2018 Westminster Seatings was seeking to make use of its American nonprofit status to provide a show as a court of inquiry, rather than displaying the workings of a formal judicial court, as intended in the beginning.  Rebecca Cope and the American team of volunteers were working to set up a court system similar to existing legal courts, such as the grand jury model, but with added features to protect  We the people from corrupt judges who are nonremovable from office.  These efforts were thwarted by founder Sacha Stone, who preferred giving his ITNJ Chief Justice a life term, despite Sir John Walsh’s checkered history in Australia.

So this loosely organized “inquiry” put on their show last April, and Robert David Steele asserted that child trafficking in the United States is hidden using the method of not applying for birth certificates or other types of documentation. This statement is a peculiar one,  given  Steele’s alliance with sovereign citizens, for it is primarily the sovereign citizen movement in the United States that is defying the legal requirement for birth certificates for newborns.

In the past year I have been reading various legal documents posted in two of  Robert Baty’s Facebook groups;  Kent Hovind’s Worst Nightmare and Understanding The Baby Holm Case. The primary reason for my interest in these two groups is that the members provide many insights into real life anti-government individuals and groups, including tax protestors, sovereign citizens and anti-child protective services advocates.

It is these same anti-government ideologues that constantly accuse the government of child trafficking and kidnapping.  Such accusations often are distorted information campaigns waged on social media platforms.  On the lower end of the spectrum many of these false accusations come from felons, drug addicts, persons with poor parenting skills, etc.  who are looking for a scapegoat for their own personal behavior.  On the higher spectrum, we find a number of well-educated persons ranging from engineers, lawyers, former CIA agents, etc. who are promoting internet campaigns of unfounded accusations against legitimate authorities. All of this distracts from the serious issue of the criminal conduct of those in positions of power and authority.

Robert David Steele has asserted in his Amended Complaint that “he is a vocal advocate for the exposure and criminal prosecution of pedophiles and everyone who aids and abets such horrific crimes”.  Yet during his 2017 #UNRIG campaign he made numerous undocumented, hearsay accusations against members of Congress.  This raises the question about his own motives and methods of dealing with what should be the criminal prosecution of pedophiles, rather than the forgiveness of their transgressions without regard to the justice needed for victims of pedophilia.

On June 2, 2017 Joseph Ford Cotto did a series of interviews with Robert David Steele for the San Francisco Review of Books.com.  His last one, Interview: X Spy Robert David Steele explains why Cynthia McKinney should be Donald Trump’s vice president, included the following words of Steele:Note that Robert David Steele’s motto with regard to Truth and Reconciliation is everyone gets the truth, no one goes to jail. This is a philosophical theme that is played out in the ITNJ public proceedings, when Chief Counsel Steele emphasized that “this is a court of inquiry, it’s not an adversarial court, it’s a non-profit educational event”. In other words, ITNJ is impotent as a judicial body, despite the first paragraph in the ITNJ Preamble of their Constitution, which declares Let this message go forth from this time and place to all the peoples of the world that to right the wrongs done to them and in vindication of their rights and the enforcement of just causes and to hold accountable those responsible for breaches of human rights it is proclaimed that the International Tribunal for Natural Justice is hereby established pursuant to this Constitution.

During the above San Francisco Review of Books interview, Robert David Steele  claimed that “At least six top Republican Senators are world-class pedophiles who have probably participated in child ritual murder..”.  Did Steele ever report his knowledge of these crimes  to law enforcement officials in order to bring these so-called world-class pedophiles to justice? 

The disregarding of the rules for evidence, which protect the accused from hearsay and false facts

Article 17 of the ITNJ Constitution is on Evidence and Admissibility, which gives the general rule allowing all evidence as admissible. There is a broad, and ill defined qualification to allow for dismissing frivolous complaints. However, because ITNJ is operating presently as a one-sided inquiry, rather than as a judicial court that weighs the reliability of evidence, this means that Hearsay evidence is admissible, without being subject to cross-examination by the person(s) being accused.  Robert David Steele’s own statements about pedophilia involving members of the U. S. Congress appear to represent undocumented accusations and represent hearsay.

The threat to the uniqueness of America’s laws and jurisprudence by slipshod International Tribunals and foreign laws attempting to override common legal wisdom

Here are a few statements to ponder excerpted from a Fordham International Law Journal, Volume 29, Issue 3, Article 4, 2005 called Sovereignty and the American Courts at the Cocktail Party of International Law:  The Dangers of Domestic Judicial Invocations of Foreign and International Law,  by Donald J. Kochran.   (linked here:  fordham international law 2005

page 507:  With increasing frequency and heightened debate, U. S. courts have been citing foreign and “international” law as authority for domestic decisions.  This trend is inappropriate, undemocratic, and dangerous.

page 508 footnote 9:  Professor Berkowitz explains:  Critics raise a number of serious objections.  First, officials of international institutions (to say nothing of NGOs) charged with promulgating international law lack democratic accountability…Second, as most international institutions –possessing neither police force nor military–lack the capacity to enforce their rulings and resolutions, their legal pronouncements are impotent and make a mockery of the rule of law…

page 513:  When the British colonies in North America chose to cast off their chains by revolution, they chose to create a sovereign Nation-State that was beyond the shackles and controls of outside influences.

page 515:  Importation of these over-laws in recent judicial decisions is entirely inappropriate for a country that has a constitution and a commitment to govern itself.

page 522:  After describing multiple court rulings that would need to be overturned if the Court were to consistently rely on foreign sources of authority, Justice Scalia continued:  The court should either profess its willingness to reconsider all these matters in light of the views of foreigners, or else it should cease putting forth foreigners’ views as part of the reasoned basis of its decisions.  To invoke alien law when it agrees with one’s own thinking, and ignore it otherwise, is not reasoned decision-making, but sophistry.

page 526:  As Judge Robert Bork has opined, the Framers may be turning over in their graves:  “The most ominous aspect of Roper…is the Court majority’s reliance upon foreign decisions and unratified treaties…If the meaning of a document over 200 years old can be affected by the current state of world opinion, James Madison and his colleagues labored in vain.”  It is a Constitution the courts should be expounding, not other people’s laws.

There is a battle presently being fought in our U. S. courts of law against sovereign citizen legal theories, which attempt to subvert time honored procedures for determining the facts and legal arguments in judicial proceedings.  It is high arrogance for such individuals to establish international tribunals which tend to subvert justice in order to publicize extremely serious hearsay accusations against persons who are not provided the legal safeguards to ensure that justice and truth prevail in their case. 

 

 

 

 

The Framework in which Truth is Examined

When you find a man playing “tough”, it is because he knows he has an advantage. All you have to do is shift the scenery to an environment where he doesn’t have the advantage then, nine times out of ten, his TOUGHNESS disappears.” (page 61 from Custer’s Last Stand by Dr. Peter S. Ruckman)

Back in June 2017 I began to look at the major “players” which were gathered around the Port of Charleston dirty bomb incident. I wrote a number of  posts on some of those persons based on the observations I had made at that point in time.  Back then, I could see a RICO lawsuit coming. In fact, I still have an unfinished post from August of 2017 which I never got around to publishing called RICOcheting and RACKETeering, using the cartoon below to illustrate the end game of all those adversarial standoffs which were happening back then.

Prior to Robert David Steele filing his defamation lawsuit,  I had been observing Dave (Acton) Sweigert, and learning about preservation of evidence and spoliation. He had been warning several individuals of possible copyright or trademark violations, wire fraud, obstruction of justice or criminal investigations, intimidation or coercion of government, monetization of YouTube accounts, harassment, and  crowdstalking, which are all aspects of filing a successful RICO lawsuit.  All of these words, or derivatives of these concepts, are found in the definition of racketeering activity in the U.S. Code sections which outline the provisions of the RICO Act.

Although Dave Sweigert refers to himself as a non-attorney layman, he has a hands on experience with legal matters,  stemming from being the Pro Se Plaintiff in several Qui Tam lawsuits many years ago. Thus Sweigert is in a category all his own, in this strange saga.  One year later, we find that Jason Goodman is facing two Federal Civil Court lawsuits; one structured on defamation and conspiracy laws, and the other based on the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. The framework in which truth is examined is shifting from YouTube striking competitions to an arena where federal civil court procedures, statutes, regulations and case law are argued before a Judge.  Even when a jury trial is requested, it is a long winding road through a legal  forest before discovery and trial by a jury of peers becomes a reality.

From his YouTube platform,  Jason Goodman vacillates between being a tough guy who is comfortable breaching the boundaries of good taste and decorum when accusing his adversaries, and a woe is me, I’ve been framed cry baby. So while we all wait for the summons to be served,  I came across these oblique, but provoking words from Jason Goodman just two days ago. (But first, it is necessary for me to post a screenshot of the applicable CSTT show, in order to ward off a team of monkeys who are headed my way.)

In case you have misplaced your binoculars, the message below “500 Internal Server Error” reads, “Sorry, something went wrong. A team of highly trained monkeys has been dispatched to deal with this situation. If you see them, send them this information as text (screenshots frighten them).”  As you can see, I chose “B”, the screenshot option.

Getting back to the Jason Goodman quotation I was referring to, we hear,  “I may not necessarily know exactly what may or may not have happened to Quinn Michaels, but the second we started discussing it, it was met with derision, it was basically described as you know crazy talk and Star Trek Technology by someone who we have evidence was actually tracking Quinn Michaels and knew of his location when the injury occurred.” (Jason Goodman, 1.02.59 mark of the June 19, 2018 Crowdsource the Truth You Tube video, “The Hidden Triggers of Mass Mind Control with Special Guests Ole Dammegard and Cody Snodgres”.) 

Evidence.  It seems we are always waiting for the evidence…..and if any is presented, has it been tainted?

To provide context for Jason Goodman’s comment, we must go back to April 6, 2018 when Lift The Veil published a YouTube video called, Jason Goodman Calls Lift the Veil. One point of interest in this rambling monologue is found at the 13.14 mark, when Jason Goodman references what he terms, a decentralized distributed defamation attack.  He follows this with a broad discussion of various persons which he names, who he has had problems with in the prior year, and then at the 26.35 mark he again declares, “a new type of crime is taking place; a distributed decentralized defamation attack“.

At the 26.52 mark, Jason Goodman states,  “I called the FBI and I submitted a complaint that took about 45 minutes and in less than 24 hours I got a return phone call and I spent over three hours on the phone and have shared extensive evidence with the FBI and I find it very interesting how agitated Mr. Dave Acton has become.  I think everyone knows I have good contacts at the FBI. I’ve had retired FBI agent Robyn Gritz on my program many times.  I’ve had Thomas Paine of True Pundit, whose real identity I know very well and will not share with anyone, but I have verified that this person is a person who has a great deal of credibility and a tremendous amount of very well vetted law enforcement, active law enforcement sources and these people have assisted me and guided me as to what to do with the information.”

“And they’ve even shared things with me that I’m not prepared to share with you on this program, but tell me that everything Dave Acton is saying is false.  Dave Acton is also at best delusional, at worst psychotic, but he’s you know almost everything that guy says is a crazy manipulation and he seems to be becoming unhinged, primarily because his operation is failing and if he’s the magnificent genius who’s involved in Homeland Security and all these depositions that he talks about, why is he so ineffective for the past nine months that’s stopping little old me, a retired cinematographer who has designed a couple of 3D cameras…” (28.24) Then Jason Goodman continued to discuss his problems with various individuals.

When Jason Goodman said that he has “evidence” of someone tracking Quinn Michaels, this matter was duly noted on May 29, 2018, in Document 55 (Third Declaration of D. George Sweigert) which had been filed in Robert David Steele’s federal civil court defamation lawsuit.  Exhibit 2 of this declaration shows a screenshot of Crowdsource the Truth 2‘s April 21, 2018 broadcast where Jason Goodman says at the 1:12:22 mark, “Right.  And Dave (the undersigned) implores me to present the evidence that we have that indicated that he (the undersigned) knew your (Quinn) location in Vaughn, New Mexico right before his (Quinn) lung collapsed spontaneously.”

So Dave Sweigert had implored Jason Goodman to present his evidence!  I assume that nothing tangible was ever presented in the public domain, as Goodman is still dangling that invisible carrot on the end of a stick.

In response to the above quotation of Jason Goodman, D. George Sweigert declared,  “I hereby DENY all allegations and accusations made by Mr. Goodman that I had ANY knowledge-whatsoever-that CSTT 2.0’s researcher (Quinn Michaels) was in New Mexico-much less the city of Vaughn- when Quinn Michaels suffered a collapsed lung. This entire stream of logic is denied in all its forms by the undersigned.”

Jason Goodman’s racket ball game has now entered the Big Leagues:  Pro Se Plaintiff versus Pro Se Defendant in the Federal Civil Court 

At some point in the future, Jason Goodman will have to reply to the Federal Civil court RICO complaint filed by Sweigert. The court has sanctions for making false and unproved statements, and so this new environment will test the veracity of everyone who will be included in this case.

One of the acts of Jason Goodman, which I had not known about till recently, was described on  page 23 of the RICO complaint as, “…the plaintiff has had to endure Goodman telephoning every ambulance Emergency Medical Service system in Mt. Shasta, CA to report that Goodman has contacted the F. B. I. concerning the plaintiff”. Considering that we have seen no proof of these allegations which had been made to the FBI, I find Goodman’s behavior to be over-the-top, in his attempt to discredit Sweigert’s reputation before his professional peers.

What we are viewing in all of this Youtubing “war of the worlds” is the systematic dissolving of the boundaries of social discourse which allow all Americans to freely speak their own viewpoints, as long as defamatory statements,  as defined by law, are not made.  Whether one describes the speech activities on YouTube as personal or as investigative journalism, there is no place for making serious unfounded allegations when no genuine supporting evidence is presented.

I am hopeful that the filing of a RICO lawsuit which embodies a complaint and inquiry into the strange circumstances of the Port of Charleston dirty bomb incident, will benefit the public’s interest in protecting our fragile economic infrastructure. It took a non-attorney layman, Dave Sweigert, to bring this incident into the structured, reasoning, boundaries of the judicial system, and I commend him for doing so. 

So why wasn’t Robert David Steele’s lawsuit structured as a RICO complaint?  After all, the beginning of his troubles with Jason Goodman and CSTT started because of the Port of Charleston incident, and his defamation lawsuit displays many of the same  elements which are found in a RICO case.  For example, take a look at this screenshot of a remark made by Robert David Steele to Benjamin Fulford which I quoted in my March 21, 2018 article, And in this corner:  A Man Called SUE Contending Against Leviathan, Behemoth and God Almighty!

RICO lawsuits allow triple damages and are against conspirator/racketeer types

In addition, Steele has suggested that others with similar legal complaints might “band” together as a sort of unified force, similar to the class action concept,  against the Deep State. Robert David Steele is quoted in this screenshot  below, taken from my November 12, 2017 article, Robert David Steele & His List of Crowdstalkers & Co-Conspirators:  Is Your Name On This List?

One of the major elements of Dave Sweigert’s RICO lawsuit is the Port of Charleston dirty bomb incident.  In addition to naming Jason Goodman as defendant, others are included as wrongdoers, including George Webb Sweigert,  Okey Marshall Richards and Joe Napoli. In a personal defamation lawsuit, the plaintiff has no standing to represent the interests of others, such as the Coast Guard or the Port of Charleston.  However, in a RICO lawsuit, which is a form of class action complaint, those entities can be included as victims of the wrongdoing of the named racketeers.

I am no attorney, but it seems to me that the primary reason Steele would structure his lawsuit as a personal defamation, asking for triple damages due to the conspiracy of his defendants, rather than as a RICO lawsuit, is because he was instrumental in trying to cover over George Webb’s complicity in the dirty bomb false report incident. The following two screenshots are taken from my September 21, 2017 article Operation WHIPLASH.  (RDS’s words are in black, mine are in blue.)I  had three motivations in coming down hard on Dave Sweigert’s Port of Charleston report which he sold on Amazon.com. The first had to do with its unfinished presentation, which defeated the stated purpose of being a report which could be sent to interested Congressional members.  The second reason was that the report was  weighted more heavily against Jason Goodman than George Webb who was the primary connection to the source of false information which came from a former FBI agent provocateur.  I did not want Sweigert’s arguments to be nullified in the same manner as Robert David Steele had done in the above screenshots.  And thirdly, when presenting a legal argument, it is better to show the plain facts succinctly, without embellishment.

After reading through Dave Sweigert’s RICO complaint which was filed in federal court on June 14, 2018, I find it to be a crisply worded legal document that touches on all of the important aspects of his case, without becoming too lengthy.  Because he has attached his exhibits at the end, the overall look is professional.  This is in contrast to the Robert David Steele amended complaint which includes numerous screenshots of ridiculous images which have been embedded within the complaint itself.  One is left with the impression that attorney Biss took a PDF of  Robert David Steele’s research and poured it into a template of a defamation lawsuit, without editing it.  We shall see how things progress in both lawsuits over the coming months.

Thumbs up to Dave Sweigert for representing the public’s interest in protecting our social media and economic infrastructures from individuals who are lowering the bar of journalism and jeopardizing our societal protections.

The framework in which truth is examined is essential to the cause of justice and social stability, and I am glad Sweigert has shifted some of these issues, which were being trampled under foot in the social media, to the federal court system. While his lawsuit is a RICO civil case, we may yet see in the future that the U.S. Attorney General, as representing the government’s interests in the Port of Charleston incident, will be induced to file a criminal RICO lawsuit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Amending of a Lawsuit to include Susan (Holmes) Lutzke, as Queen Tut

Queen Tut, who was named as one of three defendants in a defamation lawsuit filed by Robert David Steele, has presented the plaintiff with the very real problem of accurately identifying her legal name and location. It is now generally believed that Susan Lutzke aka Susan Holmes of Fort Collins, Colorado is the voice of the woman who Steele had attempted to obtain a default judgment against.  However, the fact that it was Carla A. Howell’s name on the lawsuit as Queen Tut, rather than Susan Lutzke’s, caused the Judge to rule against that motion.

On March 25, 2018, the Plaintiffs’ attorney Steven S. Biss filed a Motion For Leave to File Amended Complaint with the Federal Civil Court. This Motion addresses, first of all, the correction which was needed on the lawsuit title which is now proposed to be Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network v. Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron and Susan A. Lutzke a/k/a/ “Queen Tut”.

Secondly, this lawsuit is one in which the Plaintiffs are demanding a trial by jury, and the amount of “compensatory damages, statutory damages (three-fold the damages sustained), and punitive damages” has now been proposed to be increased from $15,350,000.00 to $18,350,000.00.

The complaint has been expanded to read “defamation per se, insulting words, business conspiracy, common-law conspiracy, tortious interference with contract and business expectancies, intentional affliction of emotional distress, personal trespass by computer and computer harassment, and unauthorized use of name and picture.” These last phrases, which I have emphasized, are the additions made to the original complaint. The proposed amended complaint has been expanded from 37 pages to about 99, to include supporting examples of words and actions taken by the defendants in the months following the filing of the original complaint on September 1, 2017.

The Introduction to the proposed Amended Complaint provides several new observations of interest noting the Defendants’ “egregious disrespect for the law is eclipsed only by their actual malice and desire to injure the Plaintiffs.”  The concluding sentence states, “This case presents a new age of defamation and a unique breed of lawless and malicious conduct.”  To read the proposed amendment, click on this link:  rds lawsuit 325 2018 motion to amend complaint

While it is well known that I do not favor Robert David Steele because his political and religious views greatly differ from my own, neither have I supported any of the defendant’s words and actions by which they have introduced questionable information into the public domain. My sympathies in this legal matter are strictly reserved for the Judge who must sort through the arguments and evidence presented by both sides, and determine if this case should proceed to a trial by jury.

My continuing interest in this legal dispute stems from my concern for several trends which I see in American society, including the lowering of the quality of public discourse on the various internet platforms, the constant stating of accusations against others without providing any supporting evidence, and the use of anonymous names which promote a sense of safety for those who spread lies. It should be of interest to the general public how the American judicial system views defamation claims, especially since most persons now, including juveniles, are routinely using social media platforms to express their opinions.

The pivotal event which caused me to first observe the plaintiff and the three defendants occurred on June 14, 2017 when the Port of Charleston, South Carolina was closed due to information that was given by George Webb on Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource The Truth show, involving a warning of a possible dirty bomb aboard the Maersk Memphis. Also around that time frame, several “conflicts” erupted concerning Defango, Dave (Sweigert) Acton, George (Sweigert) Webb, Jason Goodman and Trish Negron, along with a few others on other matters. And it was about this point in time that Queen Tut made her entrance onto the scene via The Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel.

Because of the Maersk Memphis dirty bomb incident arising from George Webb’s secret insider source, there were those who speculated that this whole situation was an Operation created for the purposes of restricting free speech on the internet. If this speculation has any merit, the question is, under whose authority was an Op set in motion? But the basic problem with this type of question is that the general public does not have the means to investigate, to discover hidden facts and relationships, to uncover money trails or any other type of information which is not open sourced. Thus the Robert David Steele lawsuit does present an interesting situation because it centers on internet defamation, and thus it falls into that general area of concern over what the boundaries of free speech really are.

I have read comments that assert that Robert David Steele is not a former CIA employee, as he claims.  Yet these persons never address the fact that there is a documented record on Steele, going back years on the internet,  that is entirely consistent with his published resume, including his public interactions with high ranking military officials, his government contracts, and his writings. Because of that public record, I find that Robert David Steele’s biography is credible.  I also have stated that he has provided much information on what he believes, and on his projects, so  that anyone can form a reasoned opinion about whether or not to financially support his endeavors.

And then there are the accusations and joking references that Jason Goodman and George Webb have connections to MOSSAD. All this creates an aura of CIA versus MOSSAD, or CIA impersonators versus MOSSAD impersonators. In all of this there is also the anti Zionist versus the pro Zionist thread running through this adversarial set-up. Thus there is little of the middle ground, which is the stance of the ordinary American citizen, represented in the panoramic view of the background of how this lawsuit came into existence in the first place.

What we do know is that on Jun 13, 2017, one day prior to the Port of Charleston, South Carolina incident, George Webb met with Robert David Steele at a restaurant and together they appeared on Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel,  where several thousand dollars was raised for Steele’s #UNRIG campaign. This joint effort was so successful that Robert David Steele was scheduled for an interview with Jason Goodman and Patricia Negron two days later. However, because of the involvement of George Webb and Jason Goodman in communicating the false information which led to the closing down of the Charleston port on June 14th, Robert David Steele cancelled that interview.

According to Steele, this withdrawing of his association from Crowdsource The Truth, was the beginning of the subsequent friction he had with Goodman and Negron.  His  lawsuit complaint asserts that Queen Tut, a woman believed to be known as Carla A. Howell, began acting together and in concert with Goodman and Negron on June 15, 2017.

However, the first documented video of Queen Tut’s involvement that is noted in Steele’s lawsuit  seems to be June 26, 2017. It is also noted that Jason Goodman officially withdrew his endorsement of Robert David Steele on July 1, 2017. Coincidentally, it was on July 1, 2017 that Susan (Holmes) Lutzke, who is now accused by Robert David Steele of being Queen Tut, lost her son Jeremy Holmes when he was shot by police in Fort Collins, Colorado. This confrontation with the police, came about after his mother had phoned 911 to report that her son, armed with a large knife, was attempting to make his way to his brother’s home to fulfil a death threat.

So almost from the start of the Queen Tut arrival on the stage of Crowdsource The Truth, this tragic undercurrent of sorrow and anger arising from the death of Susan Lutzke’s son is a factor in her conduct  which needs to be kept in remembrance, as we ponder these events in hindsight.

On March 17, 2018, Jason Goodman published on his Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel a 23 minute video called Libel, Lies and Lawsuits-Queen Tut Evidence Exposed. Although some of this video had sound problems, overall the information and commentary which Goodman presents is worth considering.

Jason Goodman is seen walking along a city street with people laughing in the background, and so I pick up his commentary at the 1.17 mark as he reflects on more recent events relating to the Robert David Steele lawsuit and Queen Tut’s actions.

Jason Goodman:  “…Robert David Steele, I call him a liar, because he lied and presented evidence that he’s lied, he’s spoken about his ridiculous lawsuit and he claims to have through discovery learned that I am paid by MOSSAD.  This is a lie.  Robert David Steele has not entered Discovery with his lawsuit, and I am not paid by MOSSAD and he has no evidence of that, therefore he’s lying and I’m calling him out on his lie and anyone who wants to defend that needs to present evidence to support his claim.”

Tracking Meroz comment:  In the screenshot below  is an excerpt of a November 21, 2017  ExoNews reposting of an article written by Robert David Steele dated November 7, 2017 called “How the Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics”. Notice that Steele speculates that legal discovery will reveal monthly payments to Goodman at around $3,000 month.  I do not know if there is another document that supports Goodman’s statement that RDS had claimed he already had begun the Discovery process in his lawsuit.

excerpt from Robert David Steele article, “How The Deep State Controls Social Media & Digitally Assassinates Critics”

Jason Goodman:  “This is a very simple process.  Evidence.  Jake Morphonios, would you think I am lying? You have no evidence to prove it, to show that I’m lying. Show that I’m wrong.  Let’s focus on this lawsuit, because there’s been a lot of activity coming from Queen Tut.  Susan Lutzke is what she told me her name was, but then she also sometimes goes by Susan Holmes on, enough there was this big development you know she spread first the lie that I had somehow wanted Trish to pay a lawyer or force Trish to pay a lawyer or plan to base my defense on Trish spending money on a lawyer.  This is not true.”

“I have answered Robert David Steele some stupid childish complaint Pro Se, meaning “defending myself”, your lawyer.  Now Trish could have done that.  I didn’t tell her to hire a lawyer.  I didn’t tell Trish my legal defense, we’re just not affiliated.  I have no responsibilities, no responsibility for her.  She’s an adult woman who can make her own decisions.  She could have answered the suit Pro Se, she could have ignored it like Susan has, and it was up to Trish to do whatever she wanted so this whole stupid narrative that Susan is trying to build that I’m somehow doing something to Trish or that Robert David Steele’s lawyer not doing anything after I answered Robert David Steele’s ridiculous complaint, you know she’s trying to make it look like something is going on.  So let’s look at what recently happened.”

“There’s this website called PACER which let’s you, it’s you know, public access to court electronic records.  You can read everything you want to read about the moronic lawsuit from Robert David Steele, including a letter recently sent by someone on behalf of Queen Tut….(shows the February 21, 2018 Mercia Francis letter including birth certificate in a previously taped session which was inserted into this March 17, 2018 commentary.)

Tracking Meroz commentary:  It would appear that Jason Goodman in his March 17th broadcast,  had not checked the PACER records in early March, and so like me, missed that the Judge had issued an Order regarding the Mercia Francis letters.  This Order can be viewed in the Tracking Meroz post dated March 22, 2018.

Jason Goodman: (7.20)…”Queen Tut told me the story that the police killed her son.  I think she said it was the Fort Collins police and she also told me that she went to a protest at Colorado State University, and you can see in the lower right hand corner here, I’ve placed an image that someone took at that protest which is Susan Lutzke holding a sign that says, “KILL ALL POLICE- THEY ARE KILLING US”….”.Jason Goodman provides a clip of the November 7, 2017 City of Fort Collins meeting (FCTV) and at the 8.21 mark citizen participation is allowed, and Susan (Lutzke) Holmes is given permission to speak. Tracking Meroz comment:  The date of this appearance is coincidentally the same date noted by ExoNews for the Robert David Steele article of November 7, 2017).

Susan Lutzke Holmes: (8.24 mark of Fort Collins video)  “My name is Susan Holmes.  I have a story, that supports the Native American Awareness Month.  My son, Jeremy Holmes was an enrolled member of the Native American Tribe.  He was 19 years old.  he was slaughtered, shot to death SIX TIMES by the CSU campus police officer and by Fort Collins police officer.  That is how Fort Collins treats Native American people.”

“My son, I’m here to clear my son’s name and I’m going to make a special request from this council to give the time to do it because he has been discredited and destroyed by the DA’s report.  The DA’s opinion.  The DA used words taken from me in a traumatic state when I found he was dead in a hospital to use in his DA’s opinion to justify the slaughter of my son.  So I’m asking that you give me the time to clear his name and to talk about his life and his death in Fort Collins because the community needs to know the truth about what is happening here.”

“I, when the DA’s opinion is the only narrative that is existing right now about what happened to my son and is completely filled with a number of false statements and I can prove that.  However, when I went to the Coloradoan to try to prove to have them to purchase half a page or a page to disabuse the false statements in the DA’s Opinion, they refused to let me buy that time to write that article so that I could inform the community about what’s REALLY happening in this community about what the police are doing to Native American teenagers who are in a mental health crisis.”

Photo of Jeremy Holmes at gunmemorial.org

“I have been living in HELL for four months since my son was shot to death.  His spine was shattered, his chest was pierced, his femoral artery was torn and the rest of the bullets just hit wherever.  He bled out on the street on Prospect.  He did not deserve to die that way.  He was an incredible human being.  He was brilliant, he graduated with honors from high school.  He was in the middle of designing a game, he was an IT kid, he was registered for college.  He was an incredible human being and he did not deserve to die like that.”.

Male voice of Fort Collins city council member: (11.30) “Ma’am, thank you.”

Susan (Lutzke) Holmes: “I’m NOT done!  I want the time to talk about my son’s life and his death…”. (The council decides to take a recess).

Here is a link to the July 18, 2017 Opinion of Clifford E. Riedel, District Attorney of the Eighth Judicial District of Colorado on the shooting death of Jeremy Holmes.  There are also several websites which show the police camera footage of their engagement with the knife wielding Jeremy Holmes, which resulted in his death.

Jason Goodman:  (12.23) “…in the DA’s report found that the police acted appropriately, but Queen Tut insists otherwise, and she also would instruct the college students at the University of Colorado to kill all police….”.

Jason Goodman: (13.03) “…the point is Susan Lutzke Holmes Tut has either submitted a fraudulent document to a United States Court, that letter written saying that she’s suffering from dementia and is 80 years old.  She’s either lying to the Court or she’s been lying to all of us the whole time and that woman standing there in Fort Collins, Colorado is not Susan Lutzke or Queen Tut.  I don’t know what to make of this, but I do know that Susan Lutzke Tut Queen Tut whatever this lady’s name is, Susan Holmes is a liar who has lied to you to try to convince you that I have committed crimes, that I am involved in pedophilia.   She has presented no evidence, OK, and here’s the thing.”

“This is a message I want to send to everyone.  If you don’t like it when I address these accusations, I understand.  But you don’t have to watch and it’s your right to not watch, but I need to keep doing this because you see this is the way these people operate.  They put out fake information. They put anonymous posts, places like 4chan.  Somebody shared with me a post from an anonymous person who says, oh a friend of mine connected with Jason on Tinder and she’s 15 and Jason said this and she said that and Jason was sexting a 15 year old.  This is untrue. (gives real life examples of posting fake documents).”

Jason Goodman: (15.39)…  “Each of these people are complicit in what is now an organized operation where they are working together to defame me, to slander me, and to harass me and they’re doing this not because I’m guilty of any of the horrendous things that they’ve accused me of.  It’s because I’m having guests on Crowdsource The Truth who are bringing forth evidence that do things like help in the firing of Andrew McCabe….”

Jason Goodman: (18.10)  “I really hope someone in law enforcement in Fort Collins, Colorado or in Virginia where that false document was submitted to the Court, is there a lawyer out there who can tell me what kind of crime is it to submit a false document to the Court because there was a time that I spoke to Susan Lutzke Holmes Tut on the phone almost every day!  And that woman’s not 80, I think she’s like 50 something or 60 and the woman that we saw in those videos looks like she’s about 60…”.

Tracking Meroz commentary: 

Jason Goodman has presented an interesting commentary with regard to some of the words of Queen Tut and Robert David Steele, which he claims are unfounded statements, not backed by evidence. Also he has provided some of the back story on Susan Lutzke which helps us to better understand how she has presented herself in the public arena.

It must be recalled that it was Jason Goodman who first introduced Susan Lutzke to his audience under a false name that he invented, as a cover to hide her true identity as his journalistic source.  Subsequent to that, he was aware of the circumstances surrounding her son’s death, and this fact had been alluded to on one of their videos. Perhaps she continued on with her research on Robert David Steele as a way to refocus her thoughts away from her personal tragedy.  

If you view the police camera footage which justifies the actions which the officers were forced to take, one has to agree with the conclusions made by the District Attorney who evaluated all the facts of this situation.  It is apparent from later public comments and actions of Susan (Holmes) Lutzke,  that she did not possess the grace to acknowledge the truth of the untenable situation in which her son had placed the officers in.  Instead, she chose to falsely accuse others for the type of death which Jeremy Holmes brought upon himself. 

I have a soft spot in my heart for Susan Lutzke’s loss of her 19 year old son.  But the hard truth about life and its burdens, is that it is never excusable to falsely accuse,  or to wrongly shift the burden of blame onto others, when the facts and evidence suggest otherwise.  Because this is a Christian commentary, I do not consider this story to be just a matter of “winning” a war of words in a lawsuit, but rather the importance of making right judgments in the interest of real justice.  Our own words go deep into the very heart of what we are in the sight of God.  One day all of us will have to give an account to God for our words and deeds, and that event ought to be soberly considered by every person, as we freely communicate on the internet.

 

 

The Context, The Whole Context, and Nothing but the Context? So, Douglas Hagmann, What is the CONtext of Your Promoting Victurus Libertas, as they Unveil the Freedom Revolution?

On the December 12, 2017 Hagmann Report,  Dave Daubenmire commented to Doug Hagmann, “…you know for people to take stuff out of context-you guys get a lot of that stuff as well. Those who aren’t watching my show every day and don’t understand what, what came before this morning’s program are not, not going to understand what it is that we’re talking about.”

Dave Daubenmire, Steve Quayle, Doug and Joe Hagmann, Sheila Zilinsky, V the Guerrilla Economist and others all portrayed Kent Hovind, aka Dr. Dino of Dinosaur Adventure Land, as a man persecuted for his religious beliefs.   This Massive Skeleton in The Closet of the Christian Alternative Media is going to haunt them as they promote their anti-government rhetoric,  no matter how much they try to bend reality to hide their unloosing of the Sovereign Citizen Movement.

CONTEXT refers to those parts of writing or speech coming before or after a statement, which contribute to the full meaning intended by the author or speaker. An argument which narrows the words of a speaker or writer to the extent that the true intention and meaning has been altered, becomes falsehood.

Thus, as I was reading the motions for dismissal filed December 15, 2017 in an ongoing  lawsuit, it was interesting to observe that one defendant’s attorney was arguing  that the plaintiff had failed to  provide the entire context of certain statements which had been made by the defendants.  On the same day, a transcript of the entire radio broadcast in question was provided to the Court by the other co-defendant, in order to give the complete context of the quotations.

Since this is an ongoing lawsuit, I am not going to identify the details, but suffice it to say, that in my “unlearned ordinary citizen” opinion, that when the attorneys for the defendants decided to put into the legal record, the full context of the contested words, they opened a closet door which allowed an embarrassing skeleton to fall out.  For the very first item in the broadcast under scrutiny, regarded the 2015 legal problems of Kent Hovind.  At that time, Hovind had already served 8 plus years in jail for tax fraud, but in this broadcast, he was being held up as an innocent man who had been persecuted by the IRS and the judicial system because of his religious beliefs.

The Skeleton In The Closet of Christian Alternative Media, Kent Hovind aka Dr. Dino, suffers from amnesia whenever anyone mentions his sovereign citizen beliefs.

Some of Hovind’s legal and tax problems had stemmed from his reliance on the counsel of various persons involved in the Sovereign Citizen Movement who are anti-government and  who consider themselves above the law.

It is curious that an attorney who is attempting to show that his client’s controversial words against a plaintiff were within the legal boundaries of protected free speech, would place on the Court record, documentation which proves that the CONTEXT of the contested words included a defendant’s public misrepresentation of the facts of a lawsuit involving Kent Hovind, who was both a civil and criminal law-breaker.

The context of one’s words and actions is indeed an interesting topic to examine, especially where the subject has developed a severe case of amnesia with regard to their own personal history.   (See this short video for a reproval of Kent Hovind’s statement that he does not know what a sovereign citizen is).

As I scan the panorama of the recurring themes of the Christian Alternative Media over the years, the antigovernment rhetoric which is routinely pushed onto Christian audiences, is beginning to standout as the silhouette of the false legal theories of the Sovereign Citizen Movement.  This will become apparent as we take a cursory look at the website and broadcasts of Victurus Libertas, which one of my readers asked me to review. I had noticed this site when I had written about Robert David Steele and his #UNRIG campaign. But when I went in for a closer look, I was surprised by what I found that ties VL into the Sovereign Citizen worldview.

One has to wonder why 5 months ago the Hagmann Report, which claims 70 million downloads a year, decided to promote one of Robert David Steele’s favored internet broadcast co-hosts, Jim and Angie Blake of Victurus Libertas to greater prominence. VL now has 65,000 YouTube subscribers, which is 63% of the 103,000 subscribers which the long standing and the very popular Hagmann Report attracts.   One of the things which the Hagmanns, Robert David Steele, and Victurus Libertas share in common, is that in the recent past they all had heavily pushed the fake Pedogate stories into the public view.

On the surface, Victurus Libertas presents the image of believing in God, as their motto is based on Romans 8:31. Yet, as we shall later observe, their governing principle is in fact based on that opposing principle of God called Mammon.

Note that the Scriptures say, IF. In the case of Angie and Jim Blake, that “If” is a very large IF.

THE FREEDOM PROJECT

At the Victurus Libertas.com website,  owners Jim and Angie Blake claim that they are in the process of unveiling the Freedom Project, declaring “This is a MIND BLOWING project that will cost you absolutely NOTHING except exiting the Matrix.  In fact, you will be guaranteed sustainability and security against those who impose against us now.”

On this undated page titled, The Freedom Revolution, the Blakes claim that, “Last week, out of nowhere, we were contacted by an individual who has the means, the plans, the ideology AND the resources to help us all achieve what we so desperately want and need to do in order to free ourselves from the chains of the federal, state and local governments who have illegally enslaved us…Every Tuesday a new portion of insight will be released leading up the final unveiling of the project in it’s entirety-which is expected to be completed in early 2018.  The revolution is HERE.  How you deal with it is up to you.  You can do nothing and hope for the best, or you can control your own destiny and be a PART of the FREEDOM REVOLUTION!”

WHAT, NO VERIFIABLE CREDENTIALS?

Angie Miesner Blake, wife of James Anthony Blake,  refers to her Twitter account as Mrs. jab, and she says, “I am a truth seeker”.

Jim and Angie Blake reveal little of themselves, except that on their Facebook pages it appears that they live in Fort Worth, Texas, were married in 2009,and have 6 children between them from prior relationships. Without any supporting evidence, they claim to be activists, truthers, investigative reporters, and even critical thinkers.  Angie admits to having once been employed with Parkway Tavern, and Jim reveals on his Facebook page that he made an unpleasant discovery in the men’s room at some unknown job location. That’s quite a resume!

James Anthony Blake, host of Victurus Libertas, leaves us guessing as to his employment history. So a rough guess is that he is in his late forties and embarrassed to tell others what type of work he has done for the past 20 years

In September of 2017, the Hagmann Report featured a special interview of Jim and Angie Blake to discuss their Youtube broadcast channel, Victurus Libertas. This promotion from The Hagmann Report, as well as the repeated guest interviews of former CIA agent, Robert David Steele and former Congress woman, Cynthia McKinney, helped to advance their visibility and credibility.  But without a proper resume of Jim and Angie Blake’s employment history, we will have to rely once again on the vetting skills of the premier father/son private investigator team, Doug and Joe Hagmann, whose famous words of assurance, Trust me, folks!, caused their listeners to gloss over various fake  “Insider” sources.

It needs to be noted that Victurus Libertas (VL) also has relied on unnamed Insiders as their sources.  One of them claimed to be from the DHS, which caused me to wonder if Doug Hagmann’s Rosebud or DHS Insider, was being recycled. And then there is  FBI ANON…. Hagmann has claimed to have once worked undercover as a FBI operative, so I guess we should ask him to vet that person’s credentials.

MEMBERSHIP FEES:  THE DOOR TO INSIDER ENGAGEMENT (something Ex-Con Tax Defier, former IRS Agent,  Sherry Peel Jackson knows all about)

On the VL website which Angie heads as the Editor-in-chief, a page on Membership Levels provides a door to their  world of secret insider sources. The Basic Membership is $2 per month to support their efforts to “bring the truth forward for all to see while exposing corruption”.  This level gives the member “access to ALL worldwide news stories, be included in the weekly newsletter to stay updated on the website, as well as the VL Channel and you will have first access to EXCLUSIVE interviews from our CREDIBLE INSIDE SOURCES before anyone else.”

The Gold Membership is $5 per month which gives the Basic package plus “In addition, you will have access to 1-HIGHLY EXCLUSIVE interview per month, in which YOU will ask questions of a POLITICAL EXPERT, such as Robert David Steele, Field McConnell or possibly even Ron Paul.  We will have these HIGHLY EXCLUSIVE interviews set up each month….Your name will be used when we present the questions.  It will be just like you are interacting directly (with) the expert!”

The website, Galactic Connection.com featured a May 15, 2017 Victurus Libertas Channel Update called Under Attack But We Will Not Quit-Targeted Individuals.  As shown below, Readers and Viewers of VL can ask FBI ANON their own questions.

Galactic Connection.com also advertises, Unplug from the Matrix! Remove your controlling implants!

In the above screenshot, the Blakes ask for prayers, saying, “I never knew what the term targeted individuals meant until now.  I have empathy for all those that have been targeted by the deep state for telling the truth and exposing evil.  Pray for all those that have the courage to take on the swamp creatures.”  In the post dated May 16, 2017, which accompanies the video, Angie says, “We are fortunate and grateful to work with some really great insiders who want the truth to come out about the inner workings of our governments.  FBI Anon, most known for showing up on 4Chan from time to time with his AMA, has agreed to allow our audience to ask questions…”.

That is, those may ask who have paid for the $5/month Gold Membership.  When I was writing about Robert David Steele several months ago, I noticed that he limited his communications with the public by stipulating that he would only answer emails where the writer was also a supporter; i.e., gave him money for his #UNRIG campaign.  Some of the donations he received for Earth Intelligence Network he used to fund the various YouTube broadcasters which interviewed him.

So why would Field McConnell of Abel Danger, or “even Ron Paul” want to buy into this exclusive interview situation which might be viewed by only a handful of persons? Well, Field McConnell has interviewed Sovereign Citizen “Judge” Anna Von Reitz, which is a common denominator with the Victurus Libertas website. And we do not know if Ron Paul is even aware that his name has been dropped for commercial purposes by the Blakes.

Many Tax Defiers and Sovereign Citizen Believers Prefer the MLM model of defrauding their customers

There is an interesting link between Sovereign Citizens and the use of  MLM companies; one example which had been noted by this blog was that of Ernest Land, the Director of Creation Science Evangelism Ministries, connected with tax fraud Kent Hovind.

The exclusive interview method of enticing members as used by VL,  has the overtones of a common MLM strategy, where if the participant gets to a certain level, the customer gains access to an online resource center where certain vendors are allowed an exclusive arrangement.  Whether selling MLM Zurvita energy drinks, or VL Mugs, hoodies and shirts, or Sherry Peel Jackson’s Healthy Place products,  Victurus Libertas raison d’être is for commercial profit.  Truth is subordinate to commercial profit at Victurus Libertas; it is just another commodity to be bought and sold, like an over priced coffee mug.

The New Freedom Revolutionaries drink their coffee from a 16-ounce blood red mug for $14.99

Healthy Place’s Sherry Peel Jackson was once involved in the MLM Pinnacle Quest International (PQI), which got into legal problems with the Department of Justice. PQI was discussed in an October 12, 2010 article by Steve Rhode, called, Promoters of Debt Elimination and Tax Relief Scheme Get Hard Jail Time. Rhode explains, “PQI was an umbrella organization for numerous vendors of tax and credit card debt elimination scams. Some of the PQI vendors, such as Southern Oregon Resources Center for Education (SORCE), sold bogus theories and strategies for tax evasion. For fees starting at $10,000 SORCE assisted its customers in the creation of a series of sham business entities in the United States and Panama.  Other tax-related PQI vendors denied legitimacy of the income tax system on various theories and provided customers with a “reliance defense” that consisted of a paper trail of frivolous correspondence which a client could allegedly use as evidence of good faith if the client were prosecuted”.

Steve Rhode also notes that one of the speakers on the PQI’s Q1 audio course included “Sherry Peel-Jackson, a tax defier“. He goes on to say, “These individuals make false and fraudulent statements about the internal revenue laws..”.

In the screenshot below, Jim and Angie Blake of Victurus Libertas extol ex-con Sherry Peel Jackson as one of their heroes; therefore they have partnered with her to sell her Healthy Place products.

Sherry Peel Jackson is now out of prison, but nine years ago on September 11, 2008, the Department of Justice had issued a news release headlined, Four Year Prison Sentence Affirmed for Georgia Tax Defier:  Former IRS Employee Convicted of Tax Crimes. This notice begins, “The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a four-year prison sentence for tax defier crimes committed by Sherry Peel Jackson, a former Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employee and tax preparer, the Justice Department announced today.”

The DOJ press release explained, “…beginning in 2000, Jackson willfully and intentionally did not file her own individual tax returns.  At that time, she also operated a tax preparation business and continued to prepare, submit and file individual tax returns for her customers.  For the next three years, Jackson intentionally did not file her tax returns, despite an income of more than $400,000 in that time period…In May 2008, a federal court in Florida found Jackson to have been advancing frivolous tax arguments at a Pinnacle Quest International (PQI) sales conference and in PQI promotional materials.  The court barred PQI and its principals from publicizing tax fraud schemes.”

Victurus Libertas features 3 interviews with Sherry Peal Jackson; the one on August 28, 2017 proclaims, Former IRS Agent Sherry Peel Jackson Reveals Her New Master Plan For Being Debt-Free and Healthy, and the April 23, 2017 interview was titled, Exclusive-Former IRS Agent, Sherry Peel Jackson Exposes Income Tax/Federal Reserve Connection.

Given the past history with the fraudulent MLM PQI, and the tax defier conviction and imprisonment of Jackson, I cannot understand how Victurus Libertas can view her counsel as worthy of consideration. But perhaps it has to do with their admission that they endorse the legal theories put forth by Anna Von Reitz, who is well known in Sovereign Citizen circles.

An Interview with self-proclaimed Superior Court Judge Anna Von Reitz aka Anna Maria Riezinger

On December 6, 2017 Victurus Libertas posted their full interview of Judge Anna Von Reitz on YouTube. Then on December 16, 2017, Jim Blake claimed that they were being “targeted and attacked after (their) interview with Judge Anna Von Reitz”. In the comment section, the Blakes added this information:  “FAQ – What kind of targeting? – A. Petty Vandalism, Electromagnetic, 3 dead batteries at the same time, Financial (not disclosing at this time), Prank phone calls by Private #’s, door knocking, window tapping…Also feel like a spiritual battle going on”.

One person commented that they were praying in the name of Jesus for them, and “I bind those targeting you!”, while another offered some white witchcraft advice, saying, “Stay full of love and compassion for each other and the ones around ya, the scalar energy weapons and phyic(sp) attacks are more or less beat the same way, Practice the good energy Magic I have used the defense spells successfully…basically a boosted prayer”. Jim Blake also quoted a scripture in the book of Revelation about the inability of anyone to close a door which God opens, and also their Victurus Libertas motif, If God is for us, who can be against us?

The Full Interview began with an advertisement for their 16 ounce mug and shirts, and at the 1.15 mark, Angie says, “Hey guys, I’m so excited tonight, our guest is a state Superior Court Judge…”.

The very first statement of the interview is a lie, and Angie Blake, if she were honest would have stated that their guest, Anna Von Reitz, has falsely claimed to be a State Superior Court Judge of Alaska.  But I suppose their guest would not have granted an interview at all, unless the co-hosts had pledged to lie on her behalf.  According to  Snopes.com on December 10, 2015 The Mind Unleashed published an article that had discussed the actions of “Judge” Anna Von Reitz’s attempt to get U. S. Marshalls and the FBI to arrest Congress and the President. In the screenshot below, we see this “Judge” title discussed.

quote taken from The Mind Unleashed 12/10/2015 article, “Judge Calls For US Marshalls & FBI to arrest Congress & the President”

At this juncture of the Victurus Libertas interview, there is a distinct fork in the road. If you want to honor and exalt a LIAR who claims she is an Alaskan Superior Court Judge, listen to the rest of the interview.  If you prefer to stay within the bounds of reality, click the interview off. I am not surprised that after publicly endorsing a woman who is delusional, that the Blakes are hearing tapping on the windows, etc. which they call targeting.

Victurus Libertas has entered the twilight zone known as the Sovereign Citizen Movement.  Except don’t ever call Judge Anna a sovereign citizen, she prefers state national. Her website is Anna Von Reitz.com, and  I have been reading some of her articles and noting the links to other sites, which I will comment on at a future date, as I continue to review the antigovernment biases of the Christian Alternative News Media.

Here is what Jim Blake summed up in his Targeted and Attacked video:  “Well, folks, it’s become painfully obvious that for the last 2 weeks we have been targeted by some very bad people and some people that did not like the message that was disseminated a couple of weeks ago by Judge Anna Von Reitz in an interview that we did, an hour and fifty minutes that we did with her a couple of weeks ago and if you haven’t seen it, you need to, because it is a well of information, it’s incredible.  Basically, basically she outlines how we as Americans have all been bamboozled by the Federal government, by England, by some very rich people, and powerful people, and people that are very greedy, that want to enslave all of us.  And the Federal government deems us all as corporate entities, instead of God’s creation with inalienable rights and we have all been bamboozled into thinking that we live in the land of the free, but how free are we really when 60 or 70 percent of our money goes into taxes.”

“We’re told every morning what time to get up, what time to have lunch, what time to go home, how much sleep we need, so we can continue doing this day after day after day, to put into the system to make others rich and powerful.  Well, Judge Anna Von Reitz does a very eloquent job of telling everyone what, what happened, how it’s still happening and how we can take our lives back all of us.  These people are not very happy with that message because when the numbers, when the people, find out what has been going on for so long, they’re not going to be very happy.  Well, we’ve been targeted pretty severely and so I’m just getting our message out saying once again, please pray for us. We’re probably going to go dark for the rest of the year- we will not be deterred, we will not quit….”

Besides indicating that he does not like to have to be told to be at work by a certain time, as I suppose he prefers to sleep in, I was curious by Jim Blake’s resentful claim  of being taxed at the 60-70 percent level, since the Federal Income tax brackets peak out at about 39 percent. Even at that level, income is taxed in progressive steps, other types of  taxes are deductible, etc., so it appears that Jim Blake is unable to give a credible analysis of the most basic realities affecting the middle and upper middle classes of the United States.

So how reliable are the opinions of the Blakes and the guests which they interview at Victurus Libertas?  If you are looking for an honest and truthful discussion of the “evidence” upon which Angie and Jim Blake, Judge Anna Von Reitz, Robert David Steele, the Hagmanns or Sherry Peel Jackson rest their arguments on, you would be better off to do your own independent research.

Ironically, Anna Von Reitz accused the government, in the Victurus Libertas interview at the 5.14 mark, that  “they’re doing a bunch of legalistic chicanery and semantic deceits in order to bring forward these false claims…”. This was stated by a woman who illegally claims to be an Alaskan Superior Court Judge, and who employs a bunch of legalistic chicanery and semantic deceits in order to support her false claims!  And I did not take her words out of context.

CONtext!  The whole CONtext!  And nothing but the CONtext! Say, that would make a nice logo on a very large coffee mug or hoodie.

END NOTE:  This article on Victurus Libertas was written in response to the following comment by Danny posted under the Tracking the Leopard Meroz January 7, 2018 article on Dave Daubenmire and Doug Hagmann.

 

 

ROBERT DAVID STEELE & His List of Crowdstalkers and Co-conspirators: Is Your Name On This List?

For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged:  and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.  Matthew 7:2

On September 1, 2017 a $15,500,000 lawsuit for defamation was filed in the U. S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia-(Richmond), by attorney Steven Scott Biss, on behalf of plaintiffs Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network against three defendants,  Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron and Queen Tut a woman believed to be known as Carla A. Howell. 

Yesterday I used my PACER account to look at the court docket of this lawsuit and noticed that a summons had been served on Susan A. Lutzke of Fort Collins, Colorado, who is now known to Crowdsource The Truth viewers as Jason Goodman’s repeat guest, Queen Tut. Because of this identity change of one of the defendants, I then wanted to know if Robert David Steele had effectively cleared the public record of his false accusations that Carla A. Howell, who is connected to the Libertarian Party, had defamed and injured his reputation under the internet handle, Queen Tut.  I see that Howell’s name still appears on the lawsuit.  Will Ms. Howell now sue Mr. Steele using the exact charges that he accused her with?

One has to wonder if Steele had long considered Carla A. Howell to be his personal adversary since he had been so hasty to accuse her of slandering him under a pseudonym. This is a reasonable question given that he has stated that he is  composing an enemies list of those who disagree with him, which he desires to add to his lawsuit.

When I entered Susan A. Lutzke’s name into a search engine, not much came up, except two internet posts of note. The first is a screenshot of a Twitter message which declares that Queen Tut is Susan A. Lutzke, and gives one of her addresses of record.

The second reference to her name is found in this article written by Robert David Steele on November 8, 2017 called #GoogleGestapo -Censorship and Crowdstalking Made Easy:  How The Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics. This article only states, “…and ‘Queen Tut’ now known to be Susan Lutzky(sp).”  I reviewed this lengthy article which Medium.com says takes 37 minutes to read, and have a few comments to make on the content. I have put Robert David Steele’s words in black and my comments in maroon.

**********************************************************************************

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” (John 8:32)

It is a common writer’s device to showcase a quotation at the beginning of an article which embodies an underlying principle of the topic.  In today’s post I have begun with a quote from Matthew 7:2, For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

Robert David Steele begins his article with a quote from the Bible also; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. This is a quote used by many persons, even atheists.  But this is but the second half of a sentence spoken, and when you quote the entire words, the meaning is altered from a general “truth” to God’s truth as spoken.  The entire sentence should read (John 8:31-32) Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then ye be disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

You see, by only quoting half a sentence, Steele has altered the meaning of the word truth, as it is defined by the actual speaker of that sentence. Now why would he do that? I suppose that he wants you to think that he is interested in truth, even while he is in the act of lying about how the word truth is used in its actual context.

Steele likes to  complain that he is misunderstood because his critics have not read his Amazon.com book reviews which he claims contains great knowledge. Recently, I had spent several days reading a broad sample of his book reviews, as my intent is to be as impartial as possible.   One of those book reviews I read by Steele was on Christ’s Ventriloquists:  The Event that Created Christianity by Eric Zuesse.  Steele titles his review, Christianity is Fraud Subordinated to Empire, New Testament Written By Enemies of Jesus & Judaism. He walks in agreement with the unbelieving Jewish author, Zuesse, that throughout history,  God was powerless to preserve his own words in writing.

This is a speculative account based on personal experience and broad reading.  In no way is it a substitute for a proper legal discovery process-but it could be useful in guiding such a process.

This is the first sentence of the actual essay, after the lead quotation from the Bible on Truth.  Steele hedges his words by saying his thoughts are opinion, i.e. speculative, and we see that he has a goal in mind in revealing his words.  That goal has to do with a lawsuit where he is Plaintiff extraordinaire. He thinks it would be a good thing if Roger Stone, representing an Alt-Right white male would team up with an Alt-Left black female who goes by the handle Charlie Peach, and which he implies, by innuendo, might be Cynthia McKinney…to do what? He wants them to jointly sue Twitter.

If Roger Stone and “Charlie Peach” were to sue Twitter together, in combination with my own lawsuit against three apparatchiks and their many co-conspirators, and the new potentially formidable case by Prager University against Google, You Tube, and DOES 1-25, I believe these three cases and perhaps others might converge in a most constructive manner assuredly in the public interest.  The above juxtaposition is important-the Deep State is seeking to censor and in some cases digitally assassinate both those on the right and those on the left who challenge official narratives.  This is discrimination based on political affiliation or belief.

In previous articles I have noted his lust to sue just about anyone who does not properly admire his achievements.  One of those high points of his life is his claim to having once headed up a CIA false flag operation in South America.  By boasting of this, Robert David Steele is saying in essence that he is without a conscious whatsoever about committing criminals acts in which someone else is framed. Right now, he has retired from his CIA and government military contractor hey-days, and he wants to be a tax exempt change agent for the Presidential election process.  It appears his favorite method of change is the Federal Civil Lawsuit so that he can FORCE the legal discovery process to reveal hidden facts which he can use for his preplanned purposes. 

Below is a partial listing of specific trolls for whom I have in hand copies of defamatory statements suitable for submission to a Court, for YouTube only.  I have another list and copies of defamatory statements for Facebook.  Every single one of these individuals is discoverable in true name via legal discovery, and can be held to account as a crowdstalker and co-conspirator.(I have made 2 screenshots representing the You Tubers, below):

Is your name or internet handle on this list of 247 persons which Robert David Steele is accusing of being a crowdstalker and co-conspirator?  If so, he wants to add you to his list of defendants who he is accusing of defamation in a Federal lawsuit.  I will only note one name as it is well known…that of Omegashock, #161 on the list.  John Little has a blog named Omegashock and he is pro-Israel, so I assume that is his “crime”.    However, whenever I have read his blog and how he discusses the issues with his readers, he is always a gentleman. 

I recognize a few other handles by virtue of having read their comments on some videos which I have viewed. Once I observed, Robert David Steal, #183 commenting on Crowdsource The Truth, during live streaming.  Robert David Steal is hilarious, but one time when I was laughing at his comments, he went over the line, and Jason Goodman, #91 on the above list and one of the defendants in Steele’s lawsuit,  shut him down.  So how could anyone accuse those two of being co-conspirators?

In my direct personal experience, these troll armies are very capable at persistent pervasive crowd-stalking.  Every YouTube channel I have appeared on has been attacked (not just current, but past), to the point that most of my hosts have been forced to disable all comments, depriving the honest viewers of the interaction that I take pains to provide when not being crowd-stalked..  Many hosts have not invited me to return, perhaps influenced by the demonetization (“shadow banning”) of any interview with me rather than the substance of my work that led to my being recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize in January 2017….[Under the subtitle, Media “Hit Jobs” On Demand]…During a two-hour interview with Alex Jones…in answer to a caller who in retrospect may have been setting me up, did I address children sent into space on “20 year and out missions” to leverage growth while in transit; and an existing colony on Mars, established fifteen years ago, with 10,000 people there now.  The Daily Beast conflated these three completely separate factual concepts to discredit me.

The troll army accusation follows the list of persons which Steele wants to bring into his lawsuit as co-conspirators with the defendants Goodman, Negron and Queen Tut.    Then he launches into other problems he has had with his reputation, including his  belief that there is a colony of persons on Mars which have been living there for the past fifteen years. Robert David Steele thinks that his nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize should override any other perceptions that the public may have that he is a kook, one whose credibility hinges on his strange Hall Of Fame status on Amazon.com as a book reviewer.

As someone who has managed a false flag operation for the CIA, and who is a top published author on the topics of deep state, false flag operations, pedophilia, and fake news (and rarely but sometimes about the holocaust and Zionist subversion), I speculate that my non-profit educational website is triggering just about every flagword on the Deep State/Zionist watchlist–a watchlist that is “Top Secret” and not subject to any form of Congressional or judicial oversight….All Paths Lead to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)…

Robert David Steele never takes personal responsibility for his own reckless words and actions, or how they are seldom backed up by facts and evidence which are relevant to the assertions he publishes. 

Now in this article Robert David Steele says that his opinions are speculative.  I find it interesting that the document recently filed in his lawsuit, entitled, Defendant Patricia A. Negron’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion To Dismiss the Complaint, has this statement, “A complaint must be dismissed if it does not allege “enough facts to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.” Bell Atl. v. Twombly, 550 U. S. 544,570 (2007).  The plaintiff’s “[f]actual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.”

Under Argument, we find this, “To state a claim for defamation, the Plaintiffs must show (1) publication, (2) an actionable statement, and (3) the requisite intent…Words that are “merely offensive or unpleasant statement” are not defamatory. Id. To be defamatory, the words must make the plaintiff appear “odious, infamous, or ridiculous.”

And therein lies the problem:  it is Robert David Steele’s own words that make him appear odious, infamous, and ridiculous.  Robert David Steele ought to be suing himself.

 

John Little of Omegashock has answered RDS in his November 17, 2017 post.  To read it scroll past his main article until you reach the link to the Meroz article.

 

 

 

FYI: Robert David Steele lawsuit update on Patricia Negron

November 8, 2017 Defendant Patricia A. Negron’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss The Complaint    (click on pdf link below)

earth intelligence networks negron motion to dismiss

Also of interest is that a certificate of service shows that Queen Tut’s legal name is Susan A. Lutzke of Fort Collins, Colorado