On February 28 and March 1, 2022, Documents 379-380 & 381 were filed respectively with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the D. George Sweigert vs. Jason Goodman lawsuit.
Document 379 (2 pages) ORDER
Sweigert v Goodman Doc 379 228 2022
Document 380 (1 page) Notice of Motion: Motion for Voluntary Dismissal
Sweigert v Goodman Doc 380 228 2022
Document 381 (2 pages) Memo Endorsement Order
On February 27 & 28, and March 1, 2022, Documents 32 & 33-34 and 35-37 were filed respectively with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the Jason Goodman vs. Adam Sharp, Terrance O’Reilly, Margaret Esquenet, National Academy of Televison Arts & Sciences, Academy of Television Arts & Sciences lawsuit.
Document 32 (30 pages) Notice of Motion Seeking Leave to File an Amended Complaint
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 32 227 2022
Document 33 (2 pages) Summons in a Civil Action
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 33 228 2022
Document 34 (1 page) Certificate of Service
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 34 228 2022
Document 35 (2 pages) Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of B. Brett Heavner
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 35 301 2022
Document 36 (1 page) Certificate of Service
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 36 301 2022
Document 37 Memo Endorsement of Motion for Amended Complaint
On February 27, 2022, Document 378 was filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the D. George Sweigert vs. Jason Goodman lawsuit.
Document 378 (31 pages) Notice of Motion: Plaintiff’s Federal R. Civ. Proc. Rule 12(C) Motion for Judgment on The Pleadings
On February 22, 23, and 24, 2022, Documents 372, 373-374, & 375 were filed respectively with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the D. George Sweigert vs. Jason Goodman lawsuit.
Document 372 (4 pages) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Aaron
Sweigert v Goodman Doc 372 222 2022
Document 373 (28 pages) Defendant’s Notice of Motion to Strike
Sweigert v Goodman Doc 373 223 2022
Document 374 (1 page) Plaintiff’s Letter to Magistrate Judge Aaron Requesting Extension of Time to Comply with Order 372
Sweigert v Goodman Doc 374 223 2022
Document 375 (4 pages) OPINION & ORDER
On February 22, 2022, Document 25 was filed with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, in the George Webb Sweigert vs. Jason Goodman lawsuit.
Document 25 (14 pages) Motion for Proposed Intervention Per Rule 24(b) by Movant D. George Sweigert
On February 22, 2022, Documents 20-22 were filed with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Detroit, in the George Webb Sweigert vs. Jason Goodman lawsuit.
Document 20 (2 pages) Notice to Appear By Video Conference
George Webb Sweigert v Goodman Doc 20 222 2022
Document 21 (36 pages) D. George Sweigert, non party Complaint in Intervention
George Webb Sweigert v Goodman Doc 21 222 2022
Document 22 (24 pages) Defendant’s Objection to Order to Show Cause & Motion to Dismiss
On February 22, 2022, Documents 156-7 were filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences vs. Multimedia System Design (dba Jason Goodman of Crowdsource the Truth) lawsuit.
Document 156 (7 pages) ORDER including sanction against Goodman
NATAS v Multimedia System Design Doc 156 222 2022
Document 157 Memo Endorsement Order
Last night, February 20, 2022, Jesse and Pavana Davis produced a livestream on their Just Me YouTube channel titled, Long Weekend, Crazy Snow and Crazy Stalkers. Around the 1:39 mark, Gabe Hoffman called in to discuss some news articles he had discovered in internet archives going back to 1996 and prior, which discussed Denise Matteau. Matteau recently had her Truth Convoy YouTube channel removed for her anti-Semitic invectives against Gabe Hoffman in particular. However, Matteau has for years repeatedly made unfounded allegations against numerous persons, and she continues her defamation campaign on her craft channel.
On September 29, 2019, I wrote the article, Denise Matteau: The History of the Roots of Bitterness in Her Life Explained In Her Own Words.
The following archived news articles supplement this 2019 article:
The Berkshire Eagle, May 16, 1995
Berkshire Eagle article, date not shown but possibly around 1987
This article states in part, “The Berkshire Hills Regional School District Committee unanimously granted a petition by Denise S. Matteau to remove her daughter from the 6th grade at Bryant School after Matteau criticized the district for its policies regarding field trips.”
“Matteau will be required by law to teach her daughter, Sojourner, at home, according to district superintendent Edward L. Sakal. Sakal said the committee approved a “basic 6th grade course load” that Matteau had developed using guidelines provided by the state Department of Education. Several school committee members in fact complimented Matteau for her proposed curriculum.”
“Matteau told the board she was not in favor of a “disorganized approach to education,” and cited a proposed overnight field trip to Glousester for whale watching as an example. She said the trip’s proposed cost of $121 was “extravagant” and included stops at several expensive restaurants for meals. She said she found discrepancies in prices of certain segments of the trip when she called the bus company for confirmation of the trip.”
“Matteau said she told the teacher sponsoring the trip that $121 was too expensive for her and said she was assured that the school would be able to pay for the trip if Sojourner wanted to go.”
“This arrangement was also unacceptable, Matteau said, because it does not teach children that ‘they have to work for things. Nothing in life is free, and we shouldn’t teach our children that’.”
“She said her daughter was “sold” the trip by the teacher, who did not consult Matteau. Matteau deemed the teacher’s failure to consult her ‘dangerous and manipulative’.”
“Ironically, the whale-watching trip was cancelled, Sakal said, because the teacher who was chaperoning the trip, and had volunteered the time, was criticized by Matteau and another parent.”
“Sakal said he did not agree with Matteau’s decision to educate her daughter at home, ‘because many times, in these situations, the child comes back to school. Then the question becomes one of how to find out what level of education she’s at because we haven’t been able to monitor her. But this is a constitutional right [Matteau] has’.”
Another article on election results for Great Barrington on May 12, 1987, Denise Matteau is mentioned as being a losing candidate for Housing Authority.
The Berkshire Eagle, August 19, 1989
The Berkshire Eagle, September 17, 1996
An easier to read version of most of the “Woman Convicted” article is posted below the following two news clippings.
“Woman Convicted For Conduct at Rally”
“Pittsfield – A 43-year-old North Street woman who disrupted last year’s Take Back the Night rally was sentenced yesterday to 100 hours of community service after a jury convicted her of disorderly conduct for pushing a police officer during the rally’s final moments.”
“Denise S. Matteau’s attorney, Gregory Hession, told the District Court jury of six that Matteau’s only crime was expressing an opinion that differed from that of the rally organizers.”
‘Testimony showed that on September 7, 1995, Matteau confronted marchers on North Street and yelled that they were being brainwashed by the Women’s Services Center.”
“Matteau was arrested after she pushed Sgt. Terrence Donnelly as she tried to make her way to the ‘open microphone’ portion of the rally as it neared its conclusion in front of the Superior Court building on Wendell Avenue.”
“Jackie Wong of Hancock was one the event’s organizers and a designated ‘peacekeeper’ at the event. She testified that she had asked Donnelly to arrest Matteau about an hour earlier when Matteau confronted the marchers and loudly likened their march to Nazism.”
” ‘She was kind of scary in her intensity’, Wong testified. ‘She was very out of control, in your face, screaming…’. Wong said that Matteau didn’t appear to pose a physical threat, but added she was concerned for the emotional well-being of the marchers, many of whom had suffered some form of violent abuse.”
“Wong and other peacekeepers persuaded the marchers not to ‘engage’ or encourage Matteau. As Officer Thomas Barber, whose attention was drawn to the confrontation, approached, Matteau entered the throng of marchers, chanting alternative slogans.”
“Where most of the participants were chanting, ‘Rape is hate, women will not tolerate,’ Matteau said she chanted, ‘Women’s Services Center has its own agenda’.”
At one point, Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Tyne said, Matteau approached the mother and sister of Kristal Hopkins, a high school student murdered in November 1994 by Adam Rosier, proclaiming that they had been brainwashed.”
“Donnelly told Wong that he couldn’t arrest Matteau because she had a right to express her views.”
“On the stand, Matteau, an artist, testified that she heard the marchers chanting as they proceeded up North Street. She said she returned to her Union Street apartment and attempted to continue working, but the rhythmic chants and wails of the marchers completely distracted her. Matteau said she returned to stand on the North Street sidewalk and began to converse with them.”
“She said her purpose was to try to get some of the marchers to question the ‘conditioning they were allowing themselves to undergo by the Women’s Services Center. Going beyond the scope of a question posed by Tyne, Matteau said that the march was a training ground for violence, not a protest against violence directed at women. ‘They were being formed into a tool to perform violence, not a protest against violence directed at women’, she said. Judge Peter C. Rutherford ordered jurors to disregard the remark.”
“Matteau denied that she had yelled into people’s faces or argued with members of the Hopkins family. She said that Donnelly attempted to prevent her from approaching the microphone, but she stepped around him; remarking to nearby demonstrators, ‘Well, I guess we’re going to learn about freedom of speech’. She denied that she pushed Donnelly.”
“In his closing argument, Hession told the jury that Matteau attended the rally to express her political opinion. ‘She felt there was another side to the issue and she needed to speak up in the midst of people who believed differently than she did. You can call it disorderly. I call it courage’.”
“But Tyne urged jurors to look beyond Hession’s First Amendment defense. ‘This case isn’t about her speaking. It’s about her conduct,’ she said. As proof, she pointed to the fact that Matteau wasn’t arrested during the confrontation with the marchers on North Street.”
” ‘She said the whole point of her arrest was to curtail her speech that night – and you know her speech was not curtailed,’ Tyne said. ‘Sgt. Donnelly told the peacekeepers he couldn’t do anything about it. She was allowed to continue to express her opinion’. It wasn’t until Matteau pushed Donnelly in front of the courthouse that she was led away and handcuffed.”
“The jury returned a guilty verdict after less than half an hour of deliberations.”
“Rutherford who said this was Matteau’s fifth conviction for disorderly conduct, warned her that she risked incarceration if she continued to behave in a disorderly fashion. ‘In the grand scheme of things, this is not the worst crime,’ he said. ‘But if you keep coming back in, you could go to jail for six months’. At first, Rutherford imposed the maximum find of $200, with a $50 surfine and $35 in court costs. Hession said this would be an imposition on Matteau, who has a limited income.” [bolding added.]
“Rutherford then ordered her to perform 100 hours of community service within 60 days…”.
Denise Matteau responds in a February 20, 2022 video, Tamara Wolf Is a Liar
In this 13:53 minute video, Denise Matteau addresses some comments made by Tamara Wolf, and then launches into her critique of Gabe Hoffman and Jews.
(4:05) “…that’s what Jesse and Pavana Davis are doing, is trying to attack all artists. Gabe Hoffman, the filthy Jew lawyer; yes, I am anti-Semitic. Gabe Hoffman is a perfect example of why everyone should be. He had his Jewish lawyer send me a letter, email letter, demanding that I publicly humiliate myself in a video. That’s the kind and that guy supposedly is an anti-pedophile activist. When they make movies about these pedophiles supposedly exposing them they’re just creating more child porn.”
“Gabe Hoffman has been nothing but a shyster and he’s right in there with these people and I showed you in my video entitled Proof that the Chinese gamers are running this cult or that this is a this gamer cult has Chinese connections. Look at Gabe Hoffman, and every American has a right to be anti-Semitic when we look at what the Jewish community in New York, Philadelphia, and Los Angeles has done to our people.”
“Every time I went to a city council or a town council meeting, the person who was standing up demanding that our right to have our own holidays at Christmas time be stopped was not a Muslim, was not even an atheist; it was always a Jew. The ones who instituted racial identity politics started out with two well-known Jews in Berkshire county: Alan Chartock and Roselle Chartock. Chartock was a radio personality on Albany’s, the Albany public radio station NPR. He lived in Great Barrington. He set up a program with his wife, Roselle Chartock, who to go into the schools, and they played a game where in order to teach kids about racism, they designated everybody with blue eyes as a race to be hated and they argued that well this was just an artificial division so the children could understand those of us who had children with blue eyes understood exactly what was going on. ”
“The man that Clovis Harmon is so proud to call her friend, the man who had the password to my daughter’s own Facebook page and was making posthumous changes to it, trying to turn it into a fundraising was Jewish. He and his wife had lent my daughter four hundred dollars, and had her terrified just before she died. They were Jewish; they tried to use the Amherst Jewish community center to host a fundraiser using my daughter’s name. Yes, I’m anti-Semitic.”
“My daughter was not Jewish. Nobody in our family was Jewish. Crooked Mafia infested niece, because she got knocked up by a Jew, and when they started their racist BS, calling her Shiksa and let her know that she would face a lifetime of abuse from the Jewish community, if she tried to raise that child on her own, she caved in and not only converted, not only agreed, to castrate her son at eight days old, because that’s what circumcision is.”
“It’s not just the removal of a little piece of skin because what they do when they subject that baby boy to genital mutilation at eight days old, is they subject that baby boy to intense genital pain, when he’s pre-verbal; he has no words, a baby eight days old cannot think in words about anything, so any any intense surprising pain that they get at that time is a muscle memory for the rest of their life. And the first time that Jewish boy reaches puberty, and the first time he has pleasure, what for a healthy boy would be a pleasurable sensation, the first awakening of his sexual nature and all that happens is muscle pain of in muscle memory of intense pain, and that’s why the Jews lead the gay movement. That’s why they hate women.”
“That’s why the Gloria Steinems and Betty Friedans set up the feminist movement as a woman-hating misogynistic movement. That’s why they hate motherhood. I don’t apologize for being anti-Semitic because I’m a civilized person from a civilized culture. We don’t commit genital mutilation against our babies. We don’t tell other people they don’t have a right to their songs and their festivals.”
“Nobody in this country ever stopped the Jews from celebrating their holidays and I remember being at a city meeting where it was pointed out to them when they were even objecting, when we had changed all the singing at Christmas time to be just instrumentals, then they said no music at all was to be allowed. No music at all. And when I questioned that at a city council meeting, I pointed out that some of the songs that they were banning weren’t even religious songs; they were seasonal winter songs.”
“Only Jews were doing that to us, and I said we don’t stop your Hanukkah, we don’t stop your Yom Kippur, we don’t stop your Purim, why do you have to stop us, when you look at the political mess that this country’s in. Look at Bensonhurst, look at the Jewish communities, they fund Steve Hassan, they fund Rick Ross. Steve Hassan and Rick Ross have contracts. Rick Ross brags about his contracts with the Chinese government for hunting down Chinese people who become American citizens. They come over here to escape intense persecution, because they want the right to practice Tai Chi, and other religions and our so-called anti-cult movement hunts them down. (13:00)….
(13:39)…Justice is coming. It’s taking a long time but full justice is coming. Denise Matteau over and out.
It is never just to attribute the wrong actions of certain individuals to a person or group that did not participate in that conduct. As an example, Denise Matteau recently looked up the criminal records of Jesse Davis in Indiana and attributed conduct to the Jesse Davis of the “Just Me” Youtube which he did not commit. The records she viewed as a result of her “research” included the actions of an entirely separate individual named Jesse Davis.
Defamation is an attempt to extinguish the real life of a person; to load that person down with words and conduct that they have not said or done. It is malicious and meant to ruin the assessment of how others value that person’s true character.
After death, every one shall give an account of their words and deeds to God. I am sorry that Denise Matteau is an embittered soul, but the freedom of speech which she has pushed to the limits on this earth, will not be considered just trifling examples of “disorderly conduct” in the heavenly realm. “Whosoever loveth and maketh a lie” are spoken of in Revelation 22:15 as part of a group that includes sorcerers, whoremongers, murderers and idolaters.
On February 16 & 18, 2022, Documents 19-20 & 21-26 were filed respectively with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the Jason Goodman vs. Adam Sharp, Terrance OReilly, Margaret Esquenet, National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, and Academy of Television Arts & Sciences lawsuit.
Document 19 (2 pages) Notice of Appearance
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 19 216 2022
Document 20 (2 pages) Notice of Appearance
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 20 216 2022
Document 21 (1 page) Appearance of Counsel
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 21 218 2022
Document 22 (1 page) Corporate Disclosure Statement
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 22 218 2022
Document 23 (2 pages) Notice of Motion to Dismiss
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 23 218 2022
Document 24 (2 pages) Declaration of Mary Kate Brennan in Support of Defendant’s Joint Motion to Dismiss
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 24 218 2022
Document 24-1 (3 pages) Exhibit A
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 24-1 218 2022
Document 24-2 (2 pages) Exhibit B
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 24-2 218 2022
Document 25 (22 pages) Defendant’s Memorandum of Law in Support of their Joint Motion to Dismiss
Goodman vs Sharp Doc 25 218 2022
Document 26 (4 pages) Notice Pursuant to Local Rule 12.1 – Notice to Pro Se Litigant Who Opposes a Rule 12 Motion Supported by Matters Outside the Pleadings
Last July 2021, Jason Goodman dropped his Amicus Curiae brief into the George Webb Sweigert vs. CNN lawsuit, and since then he has included these allegations in other cases. [see Part I and Part II of the Tracking the Leopard Meroz articles].
Three weeks ago, Jason Goodman ventured out onto the snowy streets of New York, anticipating an avalanche of trouble for both George Webb Sweigert and his brother, D. (David) George Sweigert, who he has alleged participated in some sort of court fraud with an employee of the Eastern Michigan federal court, as shown in this January 29, 2022, Crowdsource the Truth livestream titled, Ghost Town NYC-Bomb Cyclone Edition Blizzard ’22.
I have excerpted the following comments from this video beginning at the 51:52 mark:
Two weeks after Jason Goodman’s video, the precarious Amicus Curiae Snowball began to shift dangerously away from the intended targets, and began to roll down the hill towards Jason Goodman.
On February 11, 2022, United States District Court Judge Gershwin A. Drain filed Document 12 in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, lawsuit George W. Sweigert v. Jason Goodman which challenged the Amicus Curiae which had been filed in the CNN lawsuit. Document 12 is an Order Enjoining Defendant (Jason Goodman) from contacting court personnel and family, and requiring Defendant to Show Cause why he should not be sanctioned.
On page 2 of this 5 page Order, the Judge states, “It has recently come to the Court’s attention that Defendant Goodman, as early as June of 2021, has contacted Court personnel complaining about the manner in which pro se documents are filed on the Court’s electronic case management docketing system. Defendant Goodman has engaged in a pattern of harassing and abusive phone calls to Court personnel. Defendant Goodman has also contacted a federal law enforcement agent to lodge unfounded fraud claims against this Court’s personnel. In the past month, Defendant Goodman has escalated his harassing behavior. He obtained the personal cellular and home phone numbers of Court staff and their family members and contacted them outside of Court business hours. During his phone calls, Defendant Goodman yells in a tirade raising myriad accusations against these Court personnel.” [bolding added.]
On page 1, the Order made the understandable error of confusing the separate Jason Goodman litigation matters involving either George Webb Sweigert or D. (David) George Sweigert, who are brothers.
D. George Sweigert filed Document 15 in the George Webb Sweigert vs. Jason Goodman lawsuit on February 14, 2022 as a Request for Intervention by Movant D. George Sweigert Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 24(b) for the Limited Purpose of Correction the Order of February 11, 2022, (ECF 12) Enjoining Jason Goodman from Contacting Court Staff. [see George Webb Sweigert v Goodman Doc 15 214 2022].
Dave Sweigert clarifies the lawsuit involving him as being separate from those his brother is involved in, and in his 20 page document brings to the Court’s attention the Twitter tweets of Jason Goodman d/b/a/ Crowdsource the Truth, as well as videos, used to raise funds to support Goodman’s participation in various lawsuits.
Additionally, on February 16, 2022, in the George Webb Sweigert vs. Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) lawsuit, the plaintiff submitted a Motion to Strike Malicious and Vexation Amicus Brief Designed to Undermine Authority of This Honorable Court. [George Webb Sweigert v CNN Doc 49 216 2022].
The Show Cause Hearing in the George Webb Sweigert vs. Jason Goodman lawsuit is scheduled for March 4, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. by Zoom teleconferencing, as ordered in Document 12. Also, Jason Goodman has been ordered to Show Cause, in writing, no later than February 25, 2022, why he should not be sanctioned for his harassing conduct toward Court personnel.
Tracking The Leopard Meroz 