Jason Goodman In A Nutshell

On May 30, 2017 Jason Goodman uploaded a video at his Crowdsource The Truth YouTube account which he called Hillary & McCabe’s Goons are Closing In Proof of Life from George Webb .  The purpose of this video was to document a phone conversation between George Webb and Jason Goodman, as Webb was claiming he was being followed by some goons outside his hotel room. The description entered under this video says, With SEIU/FBI goons closing in, George calls with stunning revelations.  Johnny B can’t arrive quickly enough, I am being blocked from uploading to YouTube, trying everything at my end…Support this movement, become a sponsor of Crowdsource the Truth.

George Webb, unidentified SEIU/FBI goon, and Jason Goodman

At the 7:12 mark of this preposterous video, George Webb who is acting as if his life is in danger, is thinking of what should be engraved on his tomb stone.

George Webb: …so if I have an epitaph you know this is what I want it to say so…

Jason Goodman: right, George

George Webb: yeah, I, I, I haven’t been totally honest with you either; I think they picked you to ah document this so..

Jason GoodmanWhat the hell are you talking about?

Now there is a fact checking question if I ever heard one. Too bad that this basic principle of  journalism is not being taught to these Crowdsourced Truthers.

Fast forward to two weeks later, where we read a CNN Wire report dated June 16, 2017 entitled, How a Conspiracy Theory Closed Part of a Major US Seaport published at wtkr.com.  As we know, the persons instrumental in causing a false report to be made about a dirty bomb aboard the ship Maersk Memphis in Charleston, South Carolina, were none other than George Webb and Jason Goodman.  While putting out to their viewing audience that Webb had received information from a reliable covert source, the reporter notes that at one point “Jason Goodman, who runs “Crowdsource for the Truth,” called a number he said was the Coast Guard while still live streaming.  Goodman identified himself to the person on the other end of the line as a “reporter with an independent news agency,” and began telling them about the alleged threat before he was interrupted.  “Is this the ‘dirty bomb’?” the person asked-someone had already called in-perhaps someone watching the live stream.”

So just who is this Jason Goodman who was picked to document George Webb? Why is it that in Jason Goodman’s Crowdsourcing videos, he appears to be technically inept? For example, his first interview with George Webb took place on a city roof top with so much background noise and phone glitches that he had to provide a transcript of their conversation. Some of his viewers suggested better methods of videotaping, in an effort to bring him into the 21st century.

I looked up the domain address of the webpage Crowdsource the truth.org, and found that it had been created on October 20, 2016.  Jason Goodman is the registered administrator of this webpage and he gives his business address for his company which is 21stcentury3D, 252 7th Avenue, #6s, New York, New York 10001.  The phone number is 212-244-8585.

21stcentury3d.com’s webpage was created January 13, 2001. And as a picture is worth a thousand words, take a careful look at these screenshots of the man who produces blundering videos documenting George Webb.

In this first one we discover that Jason Goodman is the founder and CEO of 21st Century 3D, and that he is “one of the few stereographers in the world with over 25 years of hands-on experiences in shooting stereoscopic 3D.

In the executive biography done for Brick Top Productions, Jason Goodman is listed as a Director, and noted as someone on the cutting edge…There are videos on the internet showing Jason Goodman selling the features of his Beamsplitter equipment, and it appears he understands how it works.

Was that you Jason standing atop the Marriott at the World Trade Center experimenting with 3D images of airplanes? Just kidding, or maybe not…

In the Crowdsource the Truth Face Book profile shown below, one has to ask what on earth is a Truth Engine?  How is it that Jason Goodman who uses the Alternative Media YouTube and Facebook platforms is demanding truth from the mainstream media groups, yet does not demand truth and factual evidence from George Webb’s covert sources?  Does not the dirty bomb false report suggest that their sources are not vetted?

This last photo is proof that Jason Goodman knows how to take a selfie.

Edith Hathaway is an expert on Vedic Astrology and she analyzed Jason’s birth chart in a June 30, 2017 article called Accidental Journalist & Friends: The Rise of Citizen Journalists. Hathaway is very specific in her analysis of birth charts, giving the impression that she is willing to allow others in her field to verify her work.

With regard to the source of her information on Jason Goodman, she says, Jason Goodman gave me his birth details via email from a birth certificate.  In our email exchange, he said he was “inclined to accommodate this request…but based on the attacks we have been under” he thought it best “to consult an attorney before volunteering such information.”  His attorney then allowed only month/day/year and location to be conveyed.

He needed to consult an attorney first?  Does that have anything to do with the  information he gave to government officials regarding a dirty bomb on the ship Maersk Memphis on June 14, 2017? And here I thought that only George Webb was the one who needed a lawyer for that incident.

Edith Hathaway notes, “Jason Goodman’s natal Sun at 24:14 Pisces is closely opposite George Webb’s Sun at 25:46 Virgo.  This and many other planetary configurations testify to the seemingly instant bond of friendship between them and their decision to form a working partnership almost immediately after their first interview on April 28, 2017.”

Yes, “the seemingly instant bond of friendship” is something many persons have been wondering about, particularly because conversation does not flow smoothly between these two men. Many viewers complain of the constant rudeness of Jason Goodman in suddenly cutting off George Webb in the middle of a sentence. So why have I been viewing the videos of these two men?

In the past weeks, I have been reviewing the world of 9/11 Truthers, and recently I had picked up a copy of Barrie Zwicker’s Towers of Deception:  The Media Cover-up of 9/11 (New Society Publishers 2006). I began to read on page one, the Introduction, “It’s an out-of-the blue, in-your-face, screaming-horror surprise. A nuclear weapon blows up in the harbor at Charleston, South Carolina.  It’s another 9/11.  It’s Nuclear Jihad.  A repulsed and confused world shudders at the burning devastation.  A radioactive cloud drifts off over the Atlantic…Whatever the unthinkable outrage, it is, in fact, a covert Western operation…false flag operations can be staged…”.

Barrie Zwicker was picturing several possible scenarios for the next 9/11 false flag event on American soil. So when I read the Reuters’ report on June 15, 2017  headlined, FBI opens probe of false ‘dirty bomb’ threat at South Carolina port, I noted the identical features.   In this online article by Harriet McLeod  it stated, “The FBI on Thursday said it was investigating a false threat that a ‘dirty bomb’ was on a container ship at a terminal at the Port of Charleston in South Carolina.  The terminal was shut on Wednesday night and reopened early Thursday morning by the U. S. Coast Guard after law enforcement officials completed a scan of the container ship Maersk Memphis, the Coast Guard said.  The Federal Bureau of Investigation opened its investigation because it is a crime to make a false threat against a U. S.-flagged ship, said Donald Wood, a spokesman for the bureau in Columbia, South Carolina….Wood would not comment on reports in the local news media outlets that a phone caller reporting the threat had said that the information came from an online conspiracy theorist.

As described earlier in this post, the false information originated from George Webb’s sources and Jason Goodman played an active part in tempting his listeners to respond.

I have never followed George Webb, but I know where I first heard his name.   Fictional writer Rebekah Roth in her April 2017 interview with Doug Hagmann, revealed that she was writing a fourth book, which would not continue her 9/11 theme, but would investigate other topics, which she later discovered to parallel that of researcher George Webb.  Webb, a month later was interviewed on the May 25, 2017 Hagmann Report, and described as a phenomenal researcher.

In a YouTube video called Clear and Present Danger (calm before the storm? at about the 48 minute mark, Webb discusses his use of his Clear and Present Danger warning saying, “We were giving the warning for the next 9/11.”  I have heard that MOSSAD operates on a shoe string budget, unlike our CIA. If so,  I am beginning to feel a clear and present danger with regard to this team of operatives, as their handler moves his walnut shells around and around and around. Just why Jason Goodman is involved in this collaboration with George Webb, is something that needs closer scrutiny.  The incident at the port of Charleston, South Carolina is a very serious matter, and suspect.  Once again we are seeing Alternative News Media claiming to use covert sources for the information they report on, which later turns out to be false.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sherwood Kent Bain’s Theatre of the Absurd: Part III of The Most Dangerous Book in the World: 9/11 as Mass Ritual

I have read the entire book called The Most Dangerous Book in the World: 9/11 as Mass Ritual. I had planned to comment on Section Two:  The Producers, but it was a fluff piece: a  conglomeration of images of the Statue of Liberty, the dog star Sirius, dates which probably have occult significance but were not thoroughly examined by the author, and footnotes taken from the internet for which the author did not bother to read the original source.

An example of the latter is the reference to James Shelby Downard’s argument that “a Sirius cult exists today at the highest levels of US military intelligence…etc.” Now that is a juicy carrot which you would think a donkey would take a nip at.  But rather than reading the context of this comment in the essay, Sorcery, Sex, Assassination, and the Science of Symbolism, the author quotes from redicecreations.com.  And then our author has the nerve to tell his readers to Google this or that, because he apparently feels too lazy to research the source materials himself.  Somehow all of his yawning, makes me feel too tired to give his words any more  serious consideration.

When it comes to important historical dates affecting the United States, such as July 4, 1776,  Bain fails to even mention that our Independence Day fell on the 17th of Tammuz, linking it to the Jewish calendar. Now that is an interesting fact.   He also fails to convince the reader of the calendar links between the timing of the rising of Sirius and 9/11. And if one proceeds to read the last half of his book which was predictive fiction about 2012 which never came to pass, it is an embarrassing testament of his lack of knowledge of occult planning.

So let us look at four reader comments on Amazon.com which comment on some of these issues.   The first three pertain to the Most Dangerous Book…9/11 as Mass Ritual.    The last comment was made in connection to S. K. Bain’s pen name,  Sherwood Kent, and his most recent book Most Dangerous:  A True Story. 

The first comment is by A. C. Weisbecker of banditobooks.com. He provides a link to this video which he made called Walter Interview: 9/11, the Media, and Georgie O.  I found his comment on the book on 9/11 as Mass Ritual interesting in that he gave it a five star rating while at the same time sarcastically headlining it Valuable Work from a Shill. By this tricksterism, he is now the most read commenter on this particular book.The second comment is by James Caldwell, and he gave this book 2 stars.  He remarks on the predictive fiction which is the last half of the book, which failed to come to pass.

The third comment is by Benjamin R. Garrison, and he gives this book a 1 star, stating his reasons very succinctly.

The 4th and most curious comment is from Michael A. Hoffman, II author of Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, who is extensively quoted in The Most Dangerous Book in the World:9/11 as Mass Ritual. 

His comment, however, is found under S. K. Bain’s book where he uses the pen name Sherwood Kent to write Most Dangerous: A True Story. Hoffman gives him a 5 star rating. 

Since I have not read Most Dangerous:  A True Story, but I have read several reviews of James Shelby Downard’s peculiar tale called Carnivals of Life and Death, to which this book was compared, I am not sure that Hoffman’s statement that had “Downard had had a son, he would have been S. Kent Bain” should be considered a compliment.

Pay No Attention To That Little Gray Alien Behind The Curtain: Part II of a Book Review of The Most Dangerous Book In The World: 9/11 As Mass Ritual

Section One-“The Production has ten chapters, or shall we say,  ten emanations from the Sephirot of  S. K. Bain, covering 64 pages, which includes 12 full page images, 34 notes of acknowledged sources, numerous small filler images which are not sourced, sarcastic asides, irrelevancies, and a shallow analysis of occult numerology.   The author has scripted these chapters into Six Acts of a 9/11 theatrical production, stopping every so often to interpret the numerals of the airplane flights and other images of the 9/11 events, in accordance with the writings of  Aleister Crowley and Anton LaVey.  I have to wonder why this book is called The Most Dangerous Book In The World when it is nothing more than a compilation of loosely related occult “facts”.

So explain to me why someone would persecute Kent Bain?

After this book was published Bain made some claims which were rather dramatic as shown in these screenshots taken from Amazon.com.  The first comment was made by the author, S. K. (Kent) Bain, in response to a negative book review he had received.  The second screenshot regards the “true story” of his persecution complex.

Diversionary Tactics to Avoid Unmasking The Real High Priest of 9/11

To continue on with my review, Bain declared in Chapter Four The Pet Goat that on the morning of September 11, 2001,  President George W. Bush was acting as a High Priest.  While High Priests often are middle men and reconcilers, in the Old Testament they were also Judges and Guardians who militarily protected the Temple.  In contrast to that active role, George Bush sat there passively as any bloated Baphomet, neutered, as the Twin Towers were undergoing attack, giving  the clear message that the Commander-in-Chief and President of the United States had been rendered impotent to act in any capacity.

So the question is, what does the profile look like of the actual person who was the Great Magickal Operator of 9/11? Surely Aleister Crowley and Anton LaVey have not returned from the dead!  In this book we are pointed to  clues such as The Church of Satan, or the Skull and Bones Brotherhood.. but nothing stands out in this lineup which would narrow the field of our search.

Surely, we must look for a black magician who has undertaken numerous magickal operations that were dangerous risks; and having escaped the potential blow back, received more power and authority. That would rule the juvenile personality of George W. Bush out, for he held his place of power only due to his family heritage, where he served as the weak front man.

Bain’s simplistic approach to his thesis is unconvincing, because the events of September 11 were anything but simplistic.  When one begins to consider the complexity of knowledge, and the authoritative structure  that was  required to accomplish the military objectives of the 9/11 attack, it also stands to reason that any Satanic prayer rituals that were conducted to bring about the success of this operation would have been undertaken by very serious Kabbalistic high priests who understood the dangers involved.

One of the most popular misconceptions of numerology is that all numbers are to be reduced to their essence in order to analyze them.  The practice of adding the individual digits together until one number prevails  actually veils the true identity of higher numbers.  It is as if a policeman who has caught a thief red-handed, decides to put out an APB describing a subject at large who is a male. Genuine justice requires evidence and proof that can be tied to the actual persons who committed the crime.  One does not take a fact and generalize it to the point that it is of no use; rather one takes evidence and tries to reduce it down to the smallest details that proves who the perpetrator is.

Even in the world of simplistic reasoning,  S. K. Bain misses interesting facts.  He ties flight 93 to the number of Thelema in connection with Aleister Crowley, yet he overlooks the fact that 93 is also the number of the country Afghanistan, which is where 9/11 took us. Bain finds the name Crowley in connection with 9/11 stories, but the connection is  irrelevant to his thesis. His entire chapter on the Korean Airlines flight 85 that was diverted to the Whitehorse Airport in Canada is worthless, in that he is unable to prove that “85” has any relevance to 9/11 as Mass Ritual.

The Author Gives His Readers The Silent Treatment

I am duly annoyed with the laziness of this author who continually places the reader in the position of having to search the internet to identify the source material and images which fill this book.  For example, I wondered what the name of the Tarot Deck of cards is, that he reproduced to illustrate full pages of his book.

The mystery deck turns out to be those from  Aleister Crowley’s Thoth Tarot Deck,  illustrated by Frieda Harris.  There are notable differences in how some of these Thoth Tarot cards are named and illustrated,  when compared against a traditional tarot deck such as Raider-White.

Tarot illustrations are meant to be instructive and insightful, so why does our “21st Century Kabbalist” author not explain to his readers the implications of these alternate meanings? Since Bain has introduced both these tower cards into his book,  what does he think the differences in interpretation mean in connection with the Twin Towers?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another form of Silent Treatment to which the reader runs into is revealed by an example in  Chapter One of a photo called “Falling Man”,  which became a  source of controversy in 2001.  Our author says nothing about this at all, and uses an image without any words attached,  but the pose in this particular frame is identical to Tarot Card 12, which some decks refer to as “The Hanged Man”, representing  “Sacrifice”. 


 

 

 

 

Some of the most interesting words in this book are the quotations of writers other than S. K. Bain which set the theme at the beginning of most chapters.   Michael A. Hoffman II is used five times in Section One; while Stephen Knight, Manly P. Hall, and the Scarecrow from the Wizard of Oz are each quoted once.  The  banal quote from President George W.  Bush should have been avoided altogether.

Whirlwinds as Effectual Satanic Prayer

A good theme setting quotation which Bain used for Chapter 2, is that of Manly P. Hall’s declaration from his Lectures on Ancient Philosophy.  His statement says, Symbols are oracular forms- mysterious patterns creating vortices in the substances of the invisible world.  They are centers of a mighty force, figures pregnant with an awful power, which, when properly fashioned, loose fiery whirlwinds upon the earth.

Now this is an interesting starting point, especially if you are like me and do not see into the invisible realm of our world.  Occultists who walk by sight and “see as gods”, report that magical operations produce forces which appear as whirlwinds.  This capacity of sight goes back to the fall of Eve, and then Adam, in Genesis 3, when the Serpent in the Garden of Eden asked, “Ye hath God said….?….Ye shall not surely die:  for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.”

In the Introduction to Mouni Sadhu’s The Tarot, a statement similar to Manley P. Hall’s quotation above can be found.  Sadhu states that tourbillons or vortexes “are astral creations of force which are the bases of all astro-mental realizations.  Tradition ascribes the funnel like forms to them.  Knowledge of the laws ruling over the tourbillons and their construction, is one of the foremost principles of magic.  Although it CANNOT be given in open language to the public at large, it has been sufficiently described for initiates in this course, under the veil of Kabbalistic structures. The most guarded secrets of Hermetic magic are:  finding the point of support for the tourbillon on the physical plane, and the formula of transition from the astral to the physical world.”

This passage was something I had pondered long ago when comparing the prayer of  a Satanist which takes the form of ritual acts directed towards gaining power and authority from demonic entities, versus the prayer of a Christian who through faith, humbly asks the Lord Jesus Christ to grant a request. When Job was in despair and trying to understand the hidden reasons of God concerning his personal calamity, the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind.

S. K. Bain does not seem to understand all that much about occult thinking, much less what has been written in the Bible on the very same subject.  Because occult thinking covets the power and authority of God, and “covetousness is idolatry”, James 4:3, in speaking of answers to prayers, tersely reprimands, Ye ask and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts.

Bain fails to inquire as to whether 9/11 as a Mass Ritual could ever become an effectual Satanic prayer, and if so, WHY?  Aleister Crowley’s Thelema and Anton LaVey’s the Church of Satan are both based on sexual /left hand path magick; therefore, how do they overcome the reality that a holy God stands against them as their great Adversary?  We see in the Old Testament that the Angel of the LORD stood in the path with sword drawn because Balaam’s ways were perverse.

Back on July 17, 2011 when I wrote my first post on Meroz under my Starlit Gardens blog, I entitled it Eminent Domain based on the Mouni Sadhu statement shown in bold print above, where the sorcerer is seeking to find the point of support for the tourbillon on the physical plane My first sentence referenced the day in January 1985 when I ascended World Trade Tower One for a business lunch. I stood there that day 106 stories up, looking out the windows at the view, oblivious to the future day when those who stood where I stood, became sacrificial victims.   I was thankful to descend again to less elevated floors where it seemed that natural and heavenly laws were more respected.

And then in 2011 I came across a book in the Lampasas, Texas Library called City in the Sky:  the Rise and Fall of the World Trade Center, by James Glanz and Eric Lipton,  published in 2003. After September 11,  2001, I had wondered who was the “behind the scenes” Supreme Architect of the Twin Towers. I am not referencing here the named architects who designed these structures and oversaw their construction.  It would seem that their intent was to design a viable building that would endure over time. I am speaking here of an invisible entity who would have an interest in historical timelines and occult structures.   Had these towers been given the name Cherem, a Hebrew word for something appointed to utter destruction from their very conception?

This unknown, invisible Supreme Architect and Master of the Numbers,  I called Meroz, because of his lack of loyalty to God, for his overriding characteristic is that  he “came not to the help of the LORD, to the help of the LORD against the mighty”.

Now there came a point in real history when the Port Authority in New York City needed a place to build the foundation of their vision, but there was one problem.  The merchants of Radio Row owned the land, and they had no desire to sell and to move their businesses elsewhere, and so they resisted.

In fact, the Appellate Court sided with these merchants in a 3-2 decision, finding that the legislation authorizing the World Trade Center did not constitute a valid public purpose, and therefore was unconstitutional.  Therefore, the Port Authority employed a more clever lawyer, and countered in the Court of Appeals in Albany.  They argued that “the World Trade Center was a public purpose because it would ensure that the city remained a leader in international trade and would help create a new era of greatness for the Port of New York.”  The Court gave the Port Authority the victory in a 6-1 decision.

Eminent Domain.  Remember that phrase when you consider someone’s vision to build something on land  where the transfer of ownership has to be forced by legal power against the will of  small landholders.  Such acts have their inherent dangers when it comes to attempting to master whirlwinds, as noted in Jeremiah 23:19, Behold, a whirlwind of the LORD is gone forth in fury, even a grievous whirlwind:  it shall fall grievously upon the head of the wicked.   We may yet see justice done with regard to those who were sacrificed for the sake of illegitimate power.

September 11, 2001 was a day set apart from all other days. The degree of precision of three controlled demolitions, the physical manifestations of someone’s I Will,  were of such perfection that the world is still astonished years later when they regard the free fall of three skyscrapers which had been engineered to withstand catastrophic events.   There is something about the fall of these three towers that brings to remembrance Daniel 7:24, And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise, and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.

If there was a Magician, a Magickal Operator of these events, surely he attempted to tap into the power of the words of God. For example, how about Revelation 9:1 describing the key of the fifth angel who held the key of the bottomless pit? Getting back to S. K. Bain’s book, on page 74, a full page black and white print of an artists’ rendering shows an angel with a key.  The author does not name the artist, so once again I must resort to looking it up myself on the internet.  Oh here it is. The artist is Albrecht Durer and his work of art is called The Angel with the key to the Bottomless Pit.And then there is the obvious scripture,  Revelation 9:11, which brings to remembrance the ugly pit of destruction of the twin towers, where molten metal reportedly flowed for weeks like a scene from the Abyss.  And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.

In Section One-The Production, Bain continually links the Satanism of Aleister Crowley to the numerical symbology of the flights 11, 175, 77, 93, and 85.  “85?” you ask? Well as I previously commented that was the worst written chapter in Section One where he notes that Korean Airlines flight 85 was diverted to Whitehorse Airport in the Yukon. Bain fails to observe that the ICAO code for the airport totals 77, and oddly, Prokeraia.com says in their write up of this airport that their World Area Code is 911, when a 911 World Area Code does not even exist.

Chapter Nine on WTC 7 as the Trapezoidal Proof of the 47th Problem of Euclid

Chapter Nine is called Kansas? by author S. K. Bain.  I guess the ? is to suggest that he is clueless what to name this chapter.  Perhaps it was for no other reason than to be able to quote the scarecrow in the wizard of Oz, who upon receiving a diploma, “proving”  he had a brain, recites the Pythagorean theorem.  We must note that the author states that the scarecrow gives us a mangled version of the 47th Problem of Euclid.  Bain also offers us the same.

Bain has chosen to highlight  Act Six: World Trade Center 7 in the ninth chapter, and he first begins by describing the New York Emergency Operations Center which had been located on the 23rd floor. This operation had to be relocated once a genuine emergency arose, therefore nullifying the authority of this government agency.

What is important in this chapter is the interpretation which Bain gives to the WTC 7 structure.  He entitles a subsection, Salomon’s Temple, and immediately leads us astray.  He begins, “Completed in 1987 and constructed with a trapezoidal design, the 47-story World Trade Center 7, situated directly beside the Twin Towers, was known as the Salomon Brothers building.  Recalling from Chapter Three that the Twin Towers represented the Two Pillars of Freemasonry, Jachin and Boaz, it shouldn’t surprise you to learn (if you didn’t already know) that according to tradition these pillars were located on the porch of, you betcha, King Solomon’s Temple.”

First,  in accordance with the diagram provided by the author on page 69, it is clear that WTC 7 was not “situated directly beside the Twin Towers”.  Clearly, WTC 6 stood between WTC 7 and WTC 1, and behind and off to one side was WTC 2. The building was not referred to as the Salomon Building until later in 1988 when the firm cancelled their plans to build at another location, and decided to enter into a 20 year lease with Silverstein Properties who owned the building.  It is interesting that Silverstein was  leasing the land from the Port Authority, rather than owning it outright.  Extensive renovations were done by Salomon using their own money so that they could occupy nearly half of WTC 7, thus later on this building was referred to as the Salomon Building.  There is no indication that there was a direct intention when constructing this building to liken it to King Solomon’s Temple.

The placement of the  pillars Jachin (He will establish) on the right, and Boaz (Strength) on the left of the porch of King Solomon’s Temple is not reflected in this 2001 diagram of the layout of  World Trade Center Complex, which Bain also employed in his book.

WTC complex layout in 2001

S. K. Bain asserts on page 71, that “According to the Bible, the Lord gave King David very exact measurements and specifications for Solomon’s Temple, an idea that must have struck the fancy of those responsible for the design of WTC 7, because the building was a deceptively-simple yet powerful modern occult-Masonic construct.  Its trapezoidal shape and 47 stories were an architectural embodiment of the 47th Problem of Euclid, more widely known as the Pythagorean Theorem.”  He then tells us that one of the proofs of interest “was published by future-U. S. President and Mason James A. Garfield, and instead of using the customary square it utilized a trapezoid.”

S. K. Bain  displays ignorance of the 47th Problem of Euclid, and does not prove that the trapezoidal footprint of WTC 7 matches the specifications of the 3:4:5 relationship addressed by this math/esoteric problem.  He is unable to distinguish between the mathematical issues of the Pythagorean Theorem and that of the 47th Problem of Euclid, thus misapplying the veiled interpretation of the 3:4:5 ratio which alone represents the Male, Female, Offspring aspects of the Trinity.

For those interested in proofs, Garfield presented a proof that involved a trapezoid drawing of the general equation of the Pythagorean Theorem. I do not see where Garfield used his two base triangles to represent only the the sacred geometry of the 3:4:5 relationship, which the 47th Problem of Euclid exemplifies. And the third triangle necessary to his proof involves an isosceles triangle of equal length, therefore all his proof required was that he show that it had a 90 degree angle in accordance with the general Pythagorian theorem.

Now here is a photo of the roof line of the WTC 7 building showing an imperfect trapezoidal shape.  The approximate dimensions are 329 x 149.723 x 247 x 149.723 in feet. You will find that some sites describe a 144 feet depth measure from front to back, rather than the length of the slanted sides.  S. K. Bain does not even attempt to address whether this trapezoid fits the Garfield proof in the singular case where the 3:4:5 ratios of the 47th Problem of Euclid would be relevant.

Freemasons-freemasonry.com website has an article written by Bro. William Steve Burkle KT,32 degrees, called The 47th Problem of Euclid-The Veil Lifted.  It is extremely well written in that it is highly detailed, yet understandable by anyone with a high school diploma. The author shows the differences between the general mathematics of the Pythagorean Theorem and the specific case of the 3:4:5 relationship, which is the basis for the esoteric interpretation upon which the Male-Female -Offspring/ Trinity depends.  Also of interest is how Burkle shows that the basic theorem also reflects 3 magic squares which represent Saturn, Jupiter and Mars.  And of course on September 11, 2001, which was a Tuesday, the day represented by Mars, the War God,  the Pentagon housing the U. S. War Department also had a flying object strike the building.

Now here is an interesting thing I observe, which Bain ignores, in regard to the esoteric interpretation of the 47th Problem of Euclid as representing male-female-offspring. The tarot card which exemplifies this is Number 7, which is also the number of the WTC building we are discussing. Bain makes the association between this building and the male-female-offspring esoteric symbolism, yet he does not carry this over to the Tarot, which he had leaned on for prior illustrations.

Tarot Card 7 is called The Conqueror, or the Chariot of Hermes. Mouni Sadhu in his book The Tarot says, “Most of the authors who have expounded the Tarot have used a similar construction.  Husband (1) fecundates the wife (2) resulting in the birth of the child (3) which, being fed and nursed physically and astrally (4) attains sufficient authority (4) to manifest itself on the astral plane (5) in the name of the whole family; but there meets with the dilemma of good and evil (6), chooses the GOOD and gains the victory (7).  The corresponding astrological sign is “Gemini” or the “Twins”  The hieroglyph is an arrow in direct flight, and means that once released, the arrow by its regular movement, scores a direct hit on the target…The four columns on the chariot represent the Hermetic virtues, TO DARE, TO BE SILENT, TO KNOW and TO TRY.”

What is interesting is that WTC 7 housed an emergency command center, a center of authority representing a Conqueror.  The nearby Twin Towers represent the astrological sign of Gemini, or the Twins, and the arrow which is represented by the tarot card may have some link to the arrow of flight 93, which somehow ended up being confounded in its mission.  The Conqueror in fact moved to another location, and this building fell as did the Twin Towers.  Probably this was a sign that an old order of authority was being replaced by a new order.

My thoughts on this old to new order comes from what S. K. Bain implies in the second half of his book when he predicted that Christmas 2012 would bring in another 9/11 event to cause a New Aeon to begin. In that prediction he uses the Phoenix symbolism.  Both this idea of a new aeon and of a Phoenix arising from the ashes,  plays heavily in the life of a well known, but retired, Satanist known for his deep involvement in military Psy-Ops. We are speaking of course of Dr. Michael Aquino, founder of The Temple of Set, and connected to an Order of the Trapezoid.

After giving us the confusing imagery of the 47th problem of Euclid in the design of the trapezoidal shaped WTC 7, Bain notes, “In the 1960’s, Church of Satan founder Anton Lavey formed a group which later became the governing body of the church.  Its name?  The Order of the Trapezoid.”

Bain displays 3 images of trapezoids, but does not analyze the implications of any of this.  I am going to discuss the first image which I show here.Elsewhere S. K. Bain does note that the Twin Towers displayed the 3 forked design on the exterior of the building facade.  The Furca (the fork) is the scientific name of the Twenty-First Arcanum, which Mouni Sadhu says on page 453 of The Tarot, “merely explains the strange shape of its letter Shin”.  This tarot card is known as The Fool.

In the above image of the Church of Satan trapezoid, we see the Furca (FOOL) entering through what looks like a doorway into an inverted incomplete pentagram where 3 sixes are written, suggesting the number of the beast 666. Anton LaVey and his Church of Satan based much of their teachings on that of Aleister Crowley.

AIWASS, aka The Fool: the man behind the curtain

Aleister Crowley channeled an entity called Aiwass, who he likened to the FOOL of the Tarot. Aiwass apparently had the appearance of a gray alien, as shown here.

I had mentioned that perhaps the fall of WTC 7 represented the changeover of authority in some manner, and sure enough The Church of Satan long before 2001, had a church split, with the result that a new Order of the Trapezoid was initiated by Michael A. Aquino, the founder of the Temple of Set.  Set and Typhon are other names for Aiwass, the channeled entity of Crowley.  He also linked the number 93 with his  Thelema (meaning Will) philosophy, and of course flight 93 ended up in the ground on 9/11, creating an awkward condition for bringing WTC 7 down in the same manner as the Twin Towers.

Regarding our prior observation that S. K. Bain at the time of the publishing of his book on 9/11 included his predictions of a New Aeon at the end of 2012, using Phoenix as his main motif, we know the Phoenix bird  represents resurrection/transformation from the ashes of a fire.  But Michael A. Aquino just happened to be part of the Phoenix Program in Vietnam, an assassination Psyop, discussed at this link. And Aquino also channeled an entity which explained that while the Anton LaVey Church of Satan represented an old era,  the new aeon was being handed over to Aquino’s Temple of Set. Michael Aquino channeled a book of Coming Forth By Night, linked here, in which this transfer of power was acknowledged.

Regarding Flight 11, the number eleven is connected by The Many Faces of the Zodiac.com in this link.  This screen shot shows the connection with Aiwass and Aquino.The following three links are background material on Michael Aquino:

A. Constantine black list.blogspot.com Michael Aquino Revisited

Controversial.com Michael A. Aquino-Temple of Set, by George Knowles 

The Many Faces of the Zodiac:  Michael Aquino Styles His Eyebrows like Aleister Crowley

Dr. Michael Aquino is retired from the military, having had numerous problems of accusations involving child abuse.  I do not know that he has any connection at all to the magickal workings of 9/11, but if you examine his history and influence, you will begin to grasp the difference between the practical power and authority which he had gained during his lifetime versus that of a George Bush, Jr. who is tied with the Skull and Bones Brotherhood through family relationships.

What is the profile of the head person, the Magickal Operator of 9/11? It is someone who one-on-one wrestled with dark powers, and prevailed.  It is not a man who is a mere figure piece of a secret society.

We are discussing S. K. Bain’s book on 9/11 as Mass Ritual, and noting that he considers himself daring if he “unmasks” occult generalities. Arguing on behalf of dead men, Aleister Crowley and Anton LaVey/ Church of Satan as having direct connections to 9/11, Bain then drops the whole matter like a hot potato when he brings up the Order of the Trapezoid, and its living successor.  What Bain points to which is useful, is that the magickal operations behind the 9/11 events appear to have roots in the darkest left hand paths of the occult.

My next stop will cover Comments from others who have read the works of S. K. Bain.  But I want to leave you with this thought:  Bain overlooked a connection, when he examined the number 175. You see, he does not see the mathematical characteristics of  numbers.   The 175th prime number is 1039.  Strong’s Concordance Hebrew word #1039 is the house of the leopard. How a 21st century Kabbalist overlooked that one, I have no clue.

The Brotherhood Buried Alive: Part I of A Book Review of The Most Dangerous Book In The World: 9/11 as Mass Ritual

I am usually busy throughout the day, so often my best reading times are just before sunrise, alone, with a cup of coffee.  So at that dark hour I have been looking over a book by S. K. Bain called The Most Dangerous Book in the World:  9/11 as Mass Ritual.

How did I end up at this end of the spectrum of 9/11? Well, as I moved away from the  Christian Alternative Media, I noted a Doug Hagmann interview of Rebekah Roth which was conducted in April 2017, and from there took a closer look at one of the endorsers of her book, Barbara Honegger, a former Reagan  White House insider.

In the Seattle Truthers’ 9/11 video featuring Honegger,  she lays down a foundational power point at the beginning, referencing the Project for the New American Century’s paper,  Rebuilding America’s Defenses:  Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century.   This rather dull, over generalized, piece of writing, has been presented as a key component in the 9/11 Truthers’ arsenal. It would seem that an argument was presented in 2000 that a new Pearl Harbor was necessary to provide the impetus for a sustained build up of our military.  And in the same manner that the Protocols of Zion  have been presented as “proof” of the Illuminati game plan, so this paper has been put forth as “proof” of the methodology and strategy behind the 9/11 events.

So here is our stopping off point on this journey and why we are going to examine The Most Dangerous Book in the World:  9/11 as Mass Ritual.   On the back cover we read this paragraph linking the author to the PNAC organization:   “S. K. Bain is the former art director of The Weekly Standard magazine, where he worked with William Kristol, Fred Barnes, David Brooks, Tucker Carlson and others for over five years.  During part of that time, the Project for the New American Century shared offices with the publication, and next door was the Philanthropy Roundtable, where Bain art directed for Philanthropy magazine.  The Roundtable at that point was under the leadership of John P. Walters, who went on to become President George W. Bush’s Drug Czar.”

There is a sort of Alice in Wonderland connection between an author who decides to write a book interpreting the occult symbolism of 9/11 as “Mass Ritual”, and the fact that office space was shared with the Project for the New American Century.  And given that the subject matter of 9/11 as a mass ritual  fits in with the underlying motif at Tracking the Leopard Meroz, which is subtitled The Wisdom, Madness and Folly of Satan’s Sacrifices….a book review seems in order.

The Most Dangerous Book in the World-9/11 as Mass Ritual was copyrighted in 2012 and published by Trine Day LLC out of Walterville, OR.  I had previously, in this blog, reviewed another one of their publications, Expendable Elite:  One Soldier’s Journey Into Covert Warfare by Lieutenant Colonel USASF (Ret.) Daniel Marvin. That true story involved the attempted CIA assassination of a Special Forces operation group in Vietnam that refused to take part in an illegal operation.

The Prologue of Bain’s book was written by Peter Levenda in July 2012, and is titled, Knock, Knock in reference to the act of requesting entrance into the meeting places of secret brotherhoods.  He begins, “It was inevitable that this book would be written.  There is, among conspiracy aficionados, a kind of brotherhood. (I use the gender-specific term “brotherhood” deliberately.)  It is a brotherhood buried alive.  What does that mean?”

Levenda says that his use of the term brotherhood is gender specific, meaning it excludes female participants.  So good-bye Rebekah Roth and Barbara Honegger!  We are entering into the male dominated world of conspiracy and occult enthusiasts.

His second paragraph begins, “Imagine a person buried alive”. My mind comes to a complete halt upon reading this,  as back in February 2002 I had a very strange personal experience involving such a scenario.  I was living in Denton, Texas at the time, and one day when I went to Walmart I was overcome with an overwhelming sense of fear in the parking lot.  This same sense of fear hit me on 3 occasions over a week, at that same locality.  I wondered why, as I could not see any rational reason for it.

Across the street from Walmart,  a new shopping center called Denton Crossing was undergoing site preparation.  As it turned out, after huge holes had been unearthed by a bull dozer, a man who was a soil engineer went down to get soil samples as required.  He was buried alive as tons of soil dropped on him, while he was at the bottom of a hole, apparently unnoticed by anyone.   It was a horrific scene to contemplate.  His wife had not known why he had not come home in the evening. As all possible reasons for his disappearance were examined, they began to be haunted by the impossible…and so they dug his lifeless body out of the ground.  What personally struck me was that my sense of horror across the street from this locality did not come after the event, but days before.  I was left wondering what exactly I  had perceived in my spirit.

Levenda,  after saying, “Imagine a person buried alive”, tells the reader,  “Imagine yourself…”. He discusses the ritual and symbolic “slain, burial, and raised again” initiatory programs around the world, but does not mention the case of the life and death of Jesus Christ, who was both man and God, and the only reason why occultists throughout the centuries have attempted through ritual to gain the power of His resurrection by God.

Peter Levenda says  this ritual is “a liminal event:  you are on the threshold of living and dying, and in that sacred spot you can see in both directions”.  Liminal means threshold and refers to that sensory, barely perceptible threshold which is crossed when going through a doorway.  I  presume that “seeing in both directions” is an oblique reference to the initiatory process which turns a double-minded man into a Double Headed Eagle.

At this point I must insert an observation I had made when scanning the first part of this book on 9/11 as a mass ritual.  The author displays 5 full page photos of tarot cards, and when I saw that two of these cards were the same, but from two different decks, my curiosity was piqued.  In order, these cards are:  Tower card 16 from the Rider-Waite deck, Tower card 16 from an unknown deck with the word Trumps across the bottom, Devil card 15, Death card 13, and The Star card 17. The total equals 77,  a number which the author devotes much space to interpreting.

So if the author, S. K. Bain is playing number games with his illustrations,  we ought to be observing where he is incorporating the Tarot into his work in a hidden manner.

And why not see what is not mentioned in the Prologue written by Lavenda using the knock, knock attempt to gain Gnosis by crossing a threshold of a doorway to a secret brotherhood. Oh, that act just happens to be represented by Tarot Card 2.  He also makes comments about the author  which declares Bains to be a 21st century Kabbalist, and of course that would represent Tarot card I, the Magician.

Peter Levenda quotes Robert Anton Wilson on his concept of consensus reality.  But here is an interesting side quote which Wilson had noted in his book, The Historical Illuminatus Chronicles, as being spoken by Sigismundo Celine, saying, “Is”, “is’, “is”–the idiocy of the word haunts me.  If it were abolished, human thought might begin to make sense.  I don’t know what anything “is”, I only know how it seems to me at this moment.

It reminds me of Bill Clinton’s manner of justification for his White House intern tryst…. when he protested, whatever Is is.   It is also of interest that Neuro-linguistic programming is called a Magic Operation by its originators and has as one of its key features, the attempt to eliminate from the human language all references to a state of being.  Out goes words like be, is, am, etc. which reference the existence of something real which was created by the Creator.

We see that this same attitude of rebellion, that of the creature against the Creator, is inherent in this “consensus reality” which Levanda claims is a manmade social contract, the “We obey the laws that are created by other people….”.  There is nothing suggested by Levenda that the foundation of many laws are from the Holy Bible and given for our benefit.  Even the Declaration of Independence acknowledges  natural rights that come from our Creator.   Levanda says that conspiracy theorists have one foot in the world of consensus reality” and the other foot in “the darker mechanisms of reality.  As usual, in this Alternative Truther Universe, reference is made to those who are asleep and those who are awake.

Noting  those persons who go beyond the 9/11 evidence to acknowledge the “transcendental sources of power”, Peter Levenda adds, “This involves studying their texts, their social structures, their stated goals, their secret conclaves, their antinomian beliefs and practices.  One comes face to face with the Occult.  A strange journey, indeed, from a presidential assassination to an interview with the Devil”.

His words are the prologue to a book and so twice, Levenda identifies  the author, S. K. Bain as the 21st century Kabbalist, “we have been waiting for, and this —The Most Dangerous Book in the World—may prove to be his Sepher Yetzir, his Zohar, his Liber 777.  What he is saying is that Bain, as the Magician, has created his own grand grimoire, and I suppose the readers of such are being led down the road of the initiated in the dark arts.

Finally, Peter Levenda concludes, “Whether or not you believe in a conspiracy surrounding 9/11 is not really important.  The nature of Bain’s argument is such you will find your mind expanded by the new possibilities, the arcane possibilities lurking behind political and historical events.  By choosing to see 9/11 as a ritual on a massive scale, we paradoxically may better be able to understand it, to accommodate its message on a psychological –even spiritual–level as we approach the end of 2012 and the birth of a new aeon.”

S. K. Bain thought he had a predictive gift based on his own occult knowledge and could read the future of 2012, the year of the so-called birth of a new aeon.   This fictional predictive work was  called, The Next 9/11?  2012:  Black Christmas, and forms the second half of his book.  In hindsight, he was wrong, but he gets out of being called a false prophet, by calling it fiction. Knowing human nature, we presume that if he had been right, surely he would have triumphed in the level of  his magical skills, and felt himself a prophet.

One last word on Prologue writer,  Peter Levenda, who was accused of being the man behind the pen name Simon who wrote The Gates of the Necronomicon The book is copyrighted under Levenda’s name, as shown above. But he says he is not the author Simon, only the front man.  This is strange business.  See this link for an explanation from Levenda.

Under the Acknowledgements page of the 9//11 as Mass Ritual book, S. K. Bain notes two books on which he bases much of his interpretations.  These are Prophet of Evil:  Aleister Crowley, 9/11 and the New World Order by William Ramsey, and Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare by Michael A. Hoffman II. Overall, Bain has not written a scholarly work,  and so I am dismayed that he lifts so much material from that brilliant researcher and scholar,  Michael Hoffman II.

S. K. Bain has a very bizarre comment in the Acknowledgements page which I quote here:  “Lastly, I would like to express my deepest regrets to Nermal, the “forever kitten,” who didn’t survive the writing process due to a massive failure of patience on the part of the author late one night.  PETA notice: animals were harmed during the production of this work”.  There is a Tarot Card for Sacrifice, only it does not involve cats, but shows a man hanging upside down, as in the photo Bain uses to illustrate the jumpers from the Twin Tower buildings.

In Part II, I will explore Section One, called The Production.

 

 

Mizz Bluebeam Goes To Washington

The purpose of the Third Beam – championed and executed by Barbara Honegger with the enthusiastic support of AE911 Truth core team members…was to break through the media blackout surrounding Building 7’s fall and its censorship by the official 9/11 Commission Report.  As Barbara Honegger pressed the buttons on the high-power spotlights and the Beam ignited the night sky at exactly 9:11 p.m….
ae911truth.org Oct. 8, 2010 article “Third Beam Shines Light On Government and Media Blackout of WTC 7”

In the May 9, 2017 post called Operation Coffee, Tea or Me?,  I wondered why Barbara Honegger, described as a former White House Policy Analyst & Dept. of Defense Sr. Military Affairs journalist 2000-2011,  offered her endorsement of the novel, Methodical Illusion, and the 9/11 theories of its author Rebekah Roth.  Honegger said that what Roth had accomplished  was “cutting the Gordian Knot of two of the most difficult and disturbing unanswered questions of 9/11.”

During the Hagmann Report  interview of Rebekah Roth in April of this year, two comments were made which may shed light on the factors connecting  Roth and Honegger.

The first involved a Synchronistic Moment involving a gas station receipt totaling  $9.11, which Rebekah Roth and her husband declared to be a sign from God that she should include in her novel, a certain detail she had discovered that proved the passengers on the planes had been executed by gassing.   The second statement of Roth which caused The Huh? Factor to spring to life, was when she declared, I died when I was fifteen.  Now I know why I came back.  Because I see puzzles and put them together…”

The bona fides of Honegger, at first glance, are in sharp contrast to the Honegger look-alike Rebekah Roth’s, who had a 32 year career as an airline stewardess, according to her most recent declarations. As I wondered about this sharp disparity,  I took a quick look at a video which featured Barbara Honegger speaking in Seattle on the 9/11 Pentagon attack.  The first few minutes of her presentation was professionally done, with power point projections, and a well organized and articulate delivery, so I was puzzled as to why Honegger thought so highly of the slippery methodology of fiction writer, Rebekah Roth.

As it turns out, Barbara Honegger received her undergraduate degree from Stanford in Creative Writing, and then later got her Masters in Parapsychology from John F. Kennedy University.  So Honegger and Roth share a commonality after all:  creative writing,  and an extreme view on that odd aspect of human life known as synchronicity.  An autobiographical note can be found at The Other Side of Midnight.com, shown below, which expands on these themes:

Autobiographical note on Barbara Honegger at The Other Side of Midnight.com

Barbara Honegger came from a family that provided her with worthy examples of accomplishments.  Both parents went to Stanford. Her father, William Beverly Honegger, went to Naval Officer Training School in Evanston, IL, and he was “part of the Northern Pacific fleet at Iwo Jima and an officer on a destroyer escort that sailed into Tokyo Bay for the surrender of Japan.” Barbara also went to Stanford, was associated later with the Hoover Institution, and became a military affairs journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School, which has been described as the premier science, technology and national security affairs graduate research university of the Department of Defense.

During the time when Ms. Honegger worked at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, doing research for Dr. Martin Anderson, he became the Chief Domestic Policy Advisor for President Reagan. Dr. Anderson brought Barbara with him to Washington D.C.;  therefore situating her responsibilities and influence within the inner sanctum of the White House.

Barbara Honegger’s theories of 9/11 have been discussed in detail by various persons and published online.  What I want to focus on at this moment is a 2 minute segment of a 3 hour video highlighting the speech given by Barbara Honegger at a 9/11 Truth Conference, (published May 13, 2013) in a video entitled, 9/11 Pentagon Attack-Behind the Smoke Curtain.

At the 22.50 mark of this video, Barbara Honegger says, “To succeed, the real inside job 9/11 Psy-Op required a critical mass of innocent deaths.  Believe it or not, after the World Trade Center attack in 1993 that killed, I believe ,5 people and injured about 1,000, Federal Agents were heard to say by reporter Steven Emerson, that “there had not been enough deaths this time”.  After the 1993 World Trade Center attacks, also most people don’t know this, but the World Trade Center Towers roof doors were locked, ordered locked, by official New York City policy.  So that on 9/11,  it happened because of that, that the innocent victims above the impact zone were trapped, terrorized, and killed.  They had no way to escape except to jump.  The New York Times published, I believe, that 105 victims had gotten right up to the door, where in 1993 they did, were able to go up onto the roof; but they were blocked.  Also, after the impacts and before the towers fell, dozens of military and civilian helicopters self-dispatched.  Wonderful people from the military started flying toward the NY city intending to rescue survivors from the towers to risk their lives in their helicopters.  There were ordered to go to a nearby military base so that they could not respond.”(24.20)

It is obvious to most inquirers into the events of  9/11, that the attacks were planned and carried out by those who had the motive, means and opportunity to carry out  a very  sophisticated assault. But it matters not whether you believe that these attacks were carried out by Muslim hijackers, the United States Government,  or Israeli Special Ops, those involved have blood dripping from their hands which cries out to God for justice.

When it comes to blood guilt,   Barbara Honegger makes an interesting assertion:  she claims that a Psy-Op requires a Critical Mass of Innocent Deaths.  The phrase critical mass is taken from  nuclear physics, and refers to the “smallest amount of fissile material needed for a sustained nuclear chain reaction”.  So what Honneger is suggesting is that there is a minimum number of innocent deaths that must occur, for the desired psychological chain reaction of a Psy-Op to sustain itself.

Quoting Steven Emerson on the critical mass of innocent deaths, Honegger argues that the matter of whether the WTC roof top doors were locked or not, was a significant factor in the differences of the number of persons killed on 9/11 as compared to the 1993 attack.  However, in  1993 while there were some persons rescued from the WTC roof level; the bombs had gone off in the basement, which allowed most everyone to escape.  It was thought later that those who had fled to the roof, had in reality the option of walking down to safety via the stairwells.

The general consensus of many 9/11 commentators, was that the locked roof top doors on 9/11 was a moot point, as within a very short time the smoke conditions atop the roofs made helicopter rescues an impossibility.It is curious that Honegger would target the policy of keeping the WTC  roof doors locked as proof that there was a deliberate attempt to ensure that a maximum number of innocent deaths would occur on 9/11. The smoke of the fires burning at the impact level effectively nullified all attempts to escape alive.

What the tragic and horrific end of those who were trapped on the highest floors symbolizes is Tarot Card 16, which displays a burning tower with no escape for those at the top, except to jump to their deaths.

The concept of blood sacrifice and that of blood guilt, is a fundamental concept in the Bible.  Likewise, we know that Satan is interested in blood sacrifices, as a means of empowering his own form of government.

I am going to switch your focus for a moment from the critical mass of  the 9/11 deaths to another form of blood sacrifice which Barbara Honegger had been highly interested in during the Reagan years. As a  policy advisor to President Reagan on women’s rights, Honegger wrote a white paper with the purpose of  getting all legal restraints lifted from that form of blood sacrifice called abortion.

On  December 2, 2015, Guns And Butter host  Bonnie Faulkner interviewed Barbara Honegger for a show called, We the Men vs. We the People: Reframing the Abortion Issue to Prevent Violent Escalation of The Culture War. (This link also provides a transcript of this very excellent interview, if you want to read the entire context of the sections which I am going to comment on.)

In the Introduction of this Guns and Butter interview by Bonnie Faulkner, Barbara Honegger is quoted as saying:Reading the above quotation, we must remember that abortion is an act that is performed on a woman to remove a fetus from her body’s uterus. The woman undergoing this procedure, had in most cases consented to intercourse with a man.  The uterus at no time has the power to consent or decline sexual relations between the woman and the man. Abortion represents a blood sacrifice of an innocent fetus, which if it were allowed to develop, will become a fully developed human being. In many such situations, the blood guilt falls on more than one person; often the man, family members or friends have exerted pressure on the woman,  resulting in this tragic outcome of abortion.

Barbara Honegger introduces in her White Paper  on abortion, an argument based on  a dissimilar court case.  This particular case involved a plaintiff who needed a life saving bone marrow transplant who tried to legally force his cousin, who was a compatible donor, into undergoing extraction of his  bone marrow without the donor’s consent.  Interestingly, the main argument which the plaintiff made came from Roe v. Wade!

Barbara Honegger says that the third trimester portion of this famous abortion case, “is the only  part of Roe v. Wade that gives an exception to the otherwise almost absolute right under Roe v. Wade of a pregnant woman to end her pregnancy.  In the third trimester of Roe v. Wade she’s not allowed to under all circumstances-only to save her own health.”

Barbara Honegger tells Guns and Butter host, Bonnie Faulkner, the following:

In the above quote, Honegger refers to her white paper argument as a paradigm shift.  Now this is interesting, because as a policy advisor to the White House, she was in a position of influence which potentially could cause a major shift in the a priori definition of abortion; that it is a medical procedure done on a woman in order to terminate the life of a fetus. It is difficult for me to see that the facts of the organ transplant donation lawsuit represent the same boundaries of consent which are found in the normal abortion case.  If we consider the most common case of abortion, which involves a woman who has granted a man access to her body in an consensual sex act, she, as well as the man, were voluntarily risking  conception.

Barbara Honegger’s attempt to cause a paradigm shift in how we think of abortion, would appear to be a means of redefining terms so as to eliminate blood guilt.

Compare what Barbara Honegger did in attributing 9/11 blood guilt to those who were responsible for preventing access to the roof tops of two 110 story skyscrapers, with her attempt to eliminate the blood guilt in abortion.

At the heart of the matter of the problem of fire escapes in tall buildings is that the architects have limited by design, options which might conceivably have been built into the outside of the structure to allow persons to escape fires which had cut off the inner stairwells. Rescuing persons from the top of a 110 story building is difficult enough, without having to contend with the rising smoke from a major fire. The fact that present day fire evacuation plans for high rises does not meet the ideal goal, does not necessarily mean that those who are involved in policy making had evil intentions.

As a reminder of Honegger’s presentation on this matter, see the screenshot below referring to the success of the 9/11 Psy-Op as requiring a Critical Mass Of Innocent Deaths.In contrast to her harsh judgment on the motives of persons in the WTC fire escape plans, Barbara Honegger showed no such similar strictness in her white paper  on abortion.  In fact, her motive was to  create an air tight legal argument for justifying the act of taking the life of an innocent fetus. She seems rather pleased by her clever sophistry which results in a paradigm shift in thinking.  Is not the effecting of a paradigm shift the exact same thing as what we call a Psy-Op?You see, deep in the human heart, we know that we have to give an account one day of our deeds, whether we believe in God or not.  That is the fundamental reason why you will find that the orchestrated blood sacrifices of innocents which undergird Psy-Ops, also involves a clever web of sophistry, lies, and faulty arguments to justify their own blood guilt.

At first we were told that the Twin Towers were hit by commercial jets, then by missiles, then by holograms. Something is being reframed.  Barbara Honegger, through her family connections, gets a degree from Stanford University in creative writing, then a Masters in Parapsychology, becomes a research assistant which allows the ultra feminist Mizz Bluebeam to go to Washington D.C. to create an argument which would eliminate the guilt of the blood sacrifice of innocent newly conceived humans in the womb of their “Mother”.

What is at the end of the World Trade Center’s Trinity of Blue beams? As I understand it, it was Barbara Honegger who was responsible for getting the third beam authorized.  Might it have something to do with that other project known as Blue Beam?One wonders what Critical Mass of innocent deaths will have to be reached, for that event to occur, and whether the mounting count of abortions done in America since the 1960’s are reaching the sustained nuclear reaction stage of a Psy-Op which is more horrific than 9/11.

 

 

 

 

 

As Rebekah Roth Continues To Insult Our Intelligence, Is The Pentagon Gaming Her For Their Personal Amusement?

“I am considered by many to be a foremost expert on the events of September 11, 2001.”  Rebekah Roth, author of 3 novels:  Methodical Illusion, Methodical Deception, and Methodical Conclusion.

Methodical Illusion was published on November 3, 2014, and was inititally heavily promoted by various Alternative Media radio hosts.  By the end of  2015, some of these same radio hosts had decided to investigate the credentials of the woman using the pen name  Rebekah Roth. Finally, a document by the author was brought forth as shown in this screenshot. Here is the link to this thread on lunaticoutpost.com.The link given to the supporting video now says that this video is unavailable. However, the fact that the image of this purser’s certificate from Northwest Airlines dated April 7, 2001, has been preserved on other websites creates a question. Rebekah Roth AKA Koreann Ashlie Nourani says on her About/Author Page “…This book is the result of extensive research. It is based on real life events.  It is written as a novel to protect me and my family from the repercussions that inevitably occur when you get too close to the truth.”  Ironically, just below this, the author has inserted this quote from Pearl Bailey, You never find yourself until you face the truth.

So, if Rebekah Roth claims that she was hiding her true identity behind a pen name and a fictional form of writing because she had gotten too close to the truth, but she later discloses one of her legal names to prove that she had been an airline stewardess with Northwest Airlines, would not this act nullify any complaints she makes against those who had revealed her real identity?

In January of 2016, sgtreport.com posted an article, asking Who is Rebekah Roth? Andrew brings up some thoughts on her background in the comment section of this post.  See screenshot below:  

The article which Andrew links to at jamesperloff.com is a well considered opinion piece written January 1, 2016 and entitled, Some in Truth Movement are asking questions about Rebekah Roth.

The April, 2017 Hagmann Report Interview of Rebekah Roth

With this past controversy shadowing Rebekah Roth, we are going to take a look at what this author says about herself, her novels and her 9/11 theories during an interview on The Hagmann Report several weeks ago on April 4, 2017.  The link to this show on the Hagmann YouTube site can be found here: False Flags, False Faith:  Rebekah Roth & Pastor Lankford. The interview begins around the 36.25 mark and finishes at the second hour. Douglas Hagmann first asks Rebekah Roth to introduce herself.

Rebekah Roth (37.02)…I refer to myself as like an accidental author.  I set out actually to write a novel, a fun, fluffy, summer novel for women to read about being a flight attendant, because I had a really great life as a flight attendant and I really enjoyed it and I met lots of really interesting people.  So I thought, well, this will be a kind of a fun read and I got actually you’ll see this in Methodical Illusion because I really wanted the reader to know what a flight attendant did and what it was like and because before I started flying I had no idea.  They could have handed me a sleeping bag with a logo on it and said take the last row and I’ll wake you up an hour before (UI)… I had no idea what I was getting into.

So after about 32 years of flying and I retired in 2004- I stopped flying.  So I have been flying for a long time. And ah, I thought around 2008 to 9, somewhere in there, I’ll just write this fun novel.  About 3 chapters into it I wanted to introduce this character Grace who is kind of all about gold and jewelry to a Middle Eastern man who was going to shower her with gifts.  And I Google-searched the 9/11 hijackers and found that ten of them were still alive.  And it just shocked me.  I was like “What?”.

I was like I believe the story,  as impossible as it is for an aluminum airplane to go through a sky scraper like I saw that morning on TV, and then the Shanksville and Pentagon-no airplane parts, and there is always a large tail section and landing gear and the titanium engine parts- there’s always parts that are there. And none of that was there; especially in Shanksville.  And it was just like a ditch with nothing and I remember hearing the coroner say, “Well, there was no blood, there was no bodies, there was no sign of a plane crash there”.

But yet I kept working, because, I mean, what are you going to say?  I mean I couldn’t go out and tell people that didn’t happen, – because I watched it on TV-  it did happen, right?  So I was so shocked,  I  literally just dropped my fun novel, and I started researching every thing I could.  Now granted, this was like 7 or 8 years after, and so the Zacarias Moussaoui trial had happened.

Ah, and what I found was what really intrigued me was the FBI’s transcripts from that morning, from about noon, and there are typed up transcripts from recordings they took from people that were involved, like the reservations agent that took the phone call from Betty Ong at American Airlines, and stuff and this.  And then as I was gathering all of these FBI documents I noticed that they’d left some statements out.  And when Betty Ong said, “We’re the first.”,  they later on took that out and I said, “How could she know they were the first of four airplanes because that was flight 11, it was the first one to be supposedly hijacked.

And then Betty Ong said this, she said, ah, he, as in one of the hijackers, and we were told there were several, “He sprayed pepper spray or mace and for Business class and we can’t breathe up in Business class”.  And my brain just went to all these Honolulu flights, flights where babies poo-pooed or people got sick and vomited or rum from Duty Free was dropped and broke and that smell in a pressurized cabin goes through the whole airplane.  I don’t care if it’s the 727 or a 747, it’s all circulated air.

And with pepper spray or mace, something that’s really hard to deal with, I went, oh my goodness, that means they’re not pressurized.  Because you wouldn’t be able to breathe any where in that airplane if you were pressurized.    And that’s really when I, I got that sinking feeling, and I thought, oh no, this is something really strange.  They aren’t in the air because another thing happened, was their phone calls were 27 minutes from the 2 flight attendants who called out on that flight which is impossible for a cell phone and an air phone…so I just..

Doug Hagmann:  Wait a second, why for an air phone?  I can understand the cell phone…(41.27) (they discuss the history of the installation and workings of these phones)

(46.54) (continuing the discussion about flight attendant Betty Ong on flight 11)

Rebekah Roth: (46.54) …she also said, “We’re the first”. And I thought, well, somebody had to tell her that because she wouldn’t have known about the hijackings that came later on and uh then she said something else that really triggered me because I spent a lot of time in large aircraft hangers.  Because that is where flight attendant offices often are- on the Mezzanine level, which is up above.  So they all have from the large hanger space, they have stairs.  Usually they’re in at least two, sometimes three corners of the large hanger and so she said, “he stood upstairs”. There are no stairs in a 767.  Only in a 747.

And I thought, what an odd thing for her to say, and when I realized that they weren’t pressurized, and she said, “He stood upstairs”.  I knew they were in a large hanger, and so I immediately and this was within 20 minutes of Boston Logan Airport, and I flew out of Boston, so I immediately went on Google Earth and I drew a line to see how far an airplane could go and I have a pretty good idea because I flew for 32 years and I looked out the window. (47.56)

Tracking the Leopard Meroz comments:  Official documentation found on the internet proves that Rebekah Roth choose the corrupted transcription of the tape recording of Betty Ong, over a true transcription which matched the audio word for word.  And even though she was reproved for this in a 22 minute January 24, 2016 YouTube Video put out by Conspiracy Theorista, called RothFraud Truthday Part I-NO ONE STOOD UPSTAIRS, Rebekah Roth continues to promote her story which is based on false information.

Rebekah Roth: (50.56)  And I’m here to tell you this.  I really wanted to be wrong.  I wanted to be wrong more than anybody else. I, I, I really when I found out that the cell phones for all four calls worked with the flight time to get to that Air Force Base that had been evacuated, was completely empty except for those four planes coming in.  I wanted to be so wrong when every one of those flights that came out of Dulles, Washington D.C., Newark, New Jersey, the New York area and then Boston and when the phone calls started with exactly when they had landed and probably had taxied into one of those large C-5 transport hangers.  And literally my stomach flipped when that happened.  I thought, oh my God, don’t let this be true.  I tried for months to debunk myself. I like, don’t let this be true!  Because that told me that everything we had been told and shown on 9/11 was an illusion. And that’s how I got the title.

Doug Hagmann:  Hence the title.  Right.

Rebekah Roth:  The word methodical..

Doug Hagmann:  But I’m sorry I didn’t mean..you you had referenced an air hanger, and so you’re you’re ah you’re postulating- your theory is that the aircraft-I don’t want to put words in your mouth.  Uh, what you said there about the airfield-airstrip-air uh hanger-the ultimate destination of the aircraft, the four aircraft on 9/11 is kind of where I’m pushing towards..

Rebekah Roth:  What they needed..

Doug Hagmann:  Go ahead.

Rebekah Roth: What they needed because the aircraft are jumbos, so the 767 are double aisle aircraft.  It’s similar to the size of a DC-10.

Doug Hagmann:  Right.

Rebekah Roth: They need about a 10,000 foot runway to land full of fuel.  And so what I started to do was to look within a 20 minute circle of Boston, because that was the first two flights out of Boston, for a runway.  That’s how I found the Air Force Base….(53.04)

Tracking the Leopard Meroz comments: The author  speculates, but does not detail precisely how her thesis translates into a factually based, mathematical style timeline which matches reality.

Pentagon Top Military Intelligence Contacts Rebekah Roth

Rebekah Roth:  (1.02.46) And the reason I’m going to tell you why I say that with total authority is that after Methodical Conclusion I’ve been contacted by people that were working inside the Pentagon in top level military intelligence on 9/11.  And that is the word they used.  Missile.

Doug Hagmann:  Interesting.

Rebekah Roth: ..I’ve been told that it is uh the series which is being read all through Washington D.C.  Donald Trump has all of them, um, I don’t know that he’s read them yet but uh I know he has all 3 books uhhh- the Pentagon people are reading them and it’s going like wild fire through the Pentagon and I’ve been told by 3 different sources that I, should I, should be ready to go to a Congressional Hearing- and I’m ready.  I’m on it.

Doug Hagmann: (1.03.37) Really!

Rebekah Roth: (1.03.42)  So, yeah it’s very interesting because they contacted me, he contacted me- he’s now retired- and said I want you to have my story.  And I,  he even sent me Google maps-screenshots of where exactly he was standing outside the Pentagon near the guard railing that you see in a lot of photographs between the lawn, the guard railing, the lawn and then the building.  When the explosion hit- he was standing outside and I am here to tell you that if a Boeing 757 were 100 feet over your head you would know it.(1.04.17)

…(1.07.11)  Rebekah Roth relates that the retired Pentagon employee  wanted to have his story told with someone he could trust as he was there.

Tracking the Leopard Meroz comments: You have one guess as to who sent the fictional series of Rebekah Roth to the President of the United States. In the fantasy world of the author’s mind,  the main character Vera is the fictional match of Rebekah Roth AKA Koreann Ashlie Nourani. Vera’s husband, Jeff represents Michael Harris AKA Ramjet, the author’s husband.  In her plot, her beloved husband has been murdered, leaving the President of the United States to romantically pursue Vera.

Screenshot of Methodical Deception paragraph on  Vera’s husband’s death as shown on Amazon.com.

Amazon.com

Screenshot of Methodical Deception paragraphs on Presidential interest in Vera:

Amazon.com

Is it any wonder that these books are a hot number at the Pentagon?  I would be very leery of any man who said he was from the Pentagon whose proof of his claims was a Google Earth shot, who said he wanted to tell his exclusive story to Rebekah Roth, a woman’s romance novelist, because he trusted her.

Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.  Sir Walter Scott (Marmion, 1808)

Hawking Her Books and Hidden Research Results

Doug Hagmann: (1.08.14) ( holds up his autographed book Methodical Conclusion and gives a sales spiel-“fantastic book”, tells his listeners where to order a copy and recommends to “get it autographed”, which is an extra cost option.  At (1.12.25) Doug Hagmann mentions that Rebekah Roth is coming out with a fourth book.

Rebekah Roth: (1.09) Methodical was the code word I would use as a flight attendant to let the captain know there was a protocol for hijacking, that there’s a hijacker on board…(1.10.24)…and every hijack protocol that was not followed by any of the flight attendants, and there was like 26 or 28 flight attendants involved on those four jets. (1.10:26)

(Later on, Rebekah Roth claims that many airline attendants believe her, since she knew what the code word was.)

At this point in the interview, flight termination systems and remote control of airplanes is discussed.

Rebekah Roth: (1.14.00) When that system took over a few things happened.  One, the airplane fell off of the radar.  The Air Traffic control could no longer see a blip and the pilot and the flight attendants lost communication with each other.  Now we’re their eyes and ears so if there is a hijacker in the cabin they would only know if we told them.

But one of the things that Betty Ong said was we can’t communicate with the pilots-they aren’t answering their phone and I realized right then and there that they’ve been taken over remotely, more than likely the pilots were uh thinking that the plane was crashing because it started a landing without their commands. They were descend.. uh ascending out of Boston still, they were about probably 15-16,000 feet, climbing up to 32,000 was  I think was their original initial cruising altitude and I think they were going to go up to 35.  But I have their flight plans now so after my first book came out and I got a terabyte Freedom of Information Act data and then people started coming forward and helping me read it and that’s kind of how the third book came out ah with a lot of help from some real big American heroes and I would love to be able to name them all for you, but to keep them safe, I can’t you know. (1.15.18)

Tracking the Leopard Meroz comments:  Previously, at the 1.01.32 mark, Rebekah Roth discussed that for a period of time all 757’s and 767’s came off the assembly line with a remote control access.  She says that Boeing was trying to sell a flight termination system, and the pilots she knew at that time expressed concern over this possibility.  Also at the time of 9/11 the Comptroller of the Pentagon, who was being examined for missing funds, was also the owner of a company that sold flight termination devices. For background on these comments, read the January 31, 2015 Veterans Today article Airline Whistleblower Solves 9/11 written by Kevin Barrett.

Also, earlier at the 47.57 mark, Rebekah Roth says, “Don’t forget now that we don’t get out of our jump seats until the aircraft levels off.  So things aren’t happening 5 minutes after a departure.  No hijackers are going to stand, no pilots are coming out of the cockpit, no flight attendants are going to be out of their jump seat until that airplane reaches somewhat of a cruising altitude….48.53 so I realized that everything that happened on flight 11 started happening at 18 minutes after takeoff.”

HistoryCommons.org has compiled documentation from various sources and on this page displays the Complete 911 Timeline of American Flight 11. The scheduled departure time for Flight 11 was 7:45 and its takeoff time is recorded as 7:59, 14 minutes later. Sometime between 8:13 and 8:21 the flight transponder was turned off.  But it was concluded that the plane was hijacked at 8:14, probably over Gardner, MA which is 45 minutes NW of Boston.  At 8:18 am flight attendant Betty Ong calls the Reservation Office to report her observations. While this call is reported to last 25 minutes, it is only recorded for 4 minutes, as the recording device has a default time limit.

Note that the theory of Rebekeh Roth relies on a corrupted transcript of the four minute recording of Betty Ong as foundational to her thesis that Betty Ong at 8.18 am, 19 minutes after takeoff of flight 11, was actually sitting in a hanger at the Westover Air Force Base, reading a script.

Kevin Barrett in an article dated January 13,2015 for Veterans Today, where he supports Rebekah Roth as being the Airlines Whistleblower (who) Solves 9/11, stated “According to the author’s hypothesis, the FTS-captured-and-silenced planes landed at a nearby Air Force base with gigantic hangars, which Roth identifies and a colleague who was there confirms happened, less than 20 minutes after takeoff.  Once on the ground, selected flight attendants and passengers were guided (or forced) to place cell phone calls, during which they read scripts prepared by the perpetuators.” 

My question is whether or not it can be reasonably assumed that a commercial jet can take off from the Boston Logan Airport,  land on the runway at the Westover Air Reserve Base in Chicopee, MA, taxi to a hanger, get the passengers off of the airplane, and then set down a flight attendant, give her instructions on reading her script….and have all of these actions transpire within an 18-19 minute timeframe? I am incredulous, and since Rebekah Roth seems to think it is my job, and not her job, to test and prove her hypothesis…I grit my teeth…arghhh! Try persuading your high school teacher that you have decided to delegate to her the responsibility for proving your assumptions which undergird your research. And Rebekah Roth claims she studied the hard sciences in college.

So in this peculiar state of hanging by the noose of total ignorance from the gallows of the illusive mind of that foremost 9/11 expert, Rebekah Roth, I decide to cut the rope.  First I shall imitate the author’s method of handling perplexities by studying Google Maps. I type in the directions box, the starting and ending points of Boston’s Logan Airport and the Westover Air Reserve Base, and I click on the airplane icon.  It says there are no flights between those two points!  Ah, ha!  Is this indisputable  proof that Rebekah Roth is a liar?

Well, OK, humor aside,  let’s continue on with my initial inquiry.  Suppose there was a Remote chance that there was a direct flight between those two airports on 9/11.  Let’s see, by car the distance between the two airports is 92 miles. But an airplane would have to ascend, and then descend, thus increasing the number of miles of flight by whatever triangle or trapezoid shape the airplane described in the air. And Rebekah Roth surmises that the aircraft reached the 15-16,000 foot level. I am not a pilot, so I have no real life experience of determining what the air speed of ascent and descent would be in the case of a jet covering a ground distance of 92 miles. So I look at the information given on Flight 11 to see if there is anything there I can use to make a rough, but reasonable estimate.

According to the HistoryCommons.org timeline, at about 8:14, or 15 minutes into the flight, it was believed that Flight 11 was over Gardner, MA which the record estimated was about 45 miles NW of Boston.  Google Maps shows a driving distance of 59 miles between Logan and Gardner, and so I will give Rebekah Roth the benefit of the doubt and employ the greater distance.

Using the ratio comparison of 59 miles/92 miles, we arrive at the equivalent ratio of 15 minutes/23 minutes.  So a very rough guess could be argued that  it would take this flight approximately 23 minutes to cover a ground distance of 92 miles.  This exceeds our 18/19 window by about  5 minutes. Note that we had not even factored in descent speed, the time it would take to taxi to a hanger, and the time necessary to get the airline attendant prepared to read her script.

What such a rudimentary examination suggests is that Rebekah Roth’s thesis that Flight 11 had landed at Westover, is unsupportable on the most basic,  practical level.  When we note also that she had been dishonest in misrepresenting the transcription evidence of Betty Ong’s phone conversation, I consider Rebekah Roth’s “revelations” to be grossly misleading.

Rebekah Roth is offended when people ask her, Are you for real?

Rebekah Roth:  (1.15.18)  And you know people say well, you know, you’re not real, or that’s not real, how do you know?  I do know because I sat with them and the best way that you can really experience what we experienced is in the last five chapters of Methodical Conclusion.  And when I think about it, the hair on my back of my neck stands up and my stomach will flip and I still, I still react because the conversation that you get from Tom the air traffic controller and the others when they realize what they are seeing and it can only be the bodies from the plane that were up in Westover being brought into Andrew and it is on radar and when I and an air traffic controller sat on Skype with this- we each had the file going through this.  What we experienced as best as I can give you was that moment in that book and to this moment I can still have my stomach flip and hear him say, “Oh my God”,  and he was a military air traffic controller..

Doug Hagmann:  Yep.

Rebekah Roth:   And he knows what he was looking at and he knew where they came from, and so did I.  And we literally were speechless.  And that when I got to that information and I was writing the book I really, I really totaled.  Should I put that detail in? Because this answers everybody’s question, what did they do with the people?  The bodies.  And here’s another thing that happened and has happened since then.  I was contacted- do we have enough time to tell you this?

Doug Hagmann:  Sure.

Rebekah Roth:  I was contacted by the adult child, kind of like the one sitting next to you, young, in his thirties now, whose father was a flight attendant on board who had taken him out on a drive about a week before 9/11.  He’d been flying for less than a year I believe, 9 to 10 months, something like that,  not enough time to hold a transcontinental flight on a schedule, so which made me kind of look at all the crew members with a hmmm, how were they there, why were they there?

Well, now here’s how I found out. He said to his son, I’ve been offered a job with the CIA.  The only thing is if I take that job I will never ever be able to see you or your brother again.  Now I bet you know CIA guys because I know some intelligence people and they have families and they have children and they don’t unless they’re faking their death, they don’t ever have to never see their kids again.  Now this was in the week before 9/11, the weekend before his mother, who was on the verge of divorce with the father was flown back to Boston where he was based and signed life insurance papers.  Now this by the way was a black belt in several martial arts, he’d been a police officer for some 20 years and I said well, let me just ask you this:  if your Dad was a flight attendant and there were 2 five-foot-six hijackers onboard with a box cutter, what would he have done?  Because he didn’t do anything.  He’s not really even mentioned in the story.

Doug Hagmann:  Right.

Rebekah Roth: And only the two passengers that telephoned out and so ah, you’re wondering,  if two passengers phoned out, why didn’t the crew on this one?  Cuz the first one was only 2 crew members, but 80 passengers didn’t phone out. So then, ah, I got the answer from him later then when a Delta flight attendant finished reading Methodical Conclusion.  She contacted me and we talked on the phone and ah that book really -lots of people woke up.  Oh, wait, especially us airline people, because she  told me I am here to tell you, I was, I think she had 27 years seniority and at the time, she was I think in her late forties, flying for Delta and a CIA recruiter was on their flight and offered them jobs, told them that they loved airline employees because they have a great cover job.  And we had great days off so we could take off and our neighbors wouldn’t think anything of it being gone on vacation or traveling around because we could go anywhere for 10 or 20 dollars.  And so she actually even went to a recruiting meeting and she said “You are right”.

And now I am questioning how many of the pilots and other crew members were indeed also working for the CIA, so I’m here to tell you square in my chair that 9/11 was a Central Intelligence Agency and Mossad Operation with the help of GCHQ or MI6, because the pilots of that big huge Russian cargo were British.  So that Intelligence agents that contacted me, he did that because the pilots were British.  I would only know that if I had actually spoken to the Air Traffic Controller that guided them through restricted airspace to land and offload their gold again at a CIA Base and you know that if you read the book.(1.20:39)

(1.21.50) I am here to tell you that there were not 19 Arab hijackers.  There were crew members and quote-unquote handlers like the guy on Flight 11 that was in 9B who was a Sayeret Mat’kal which is like the Jack Powers of the Israeli Mossad. Special Operations, trained assassins, trained anti-hijacking specialist and how in the world could he get killed by a plastic box cutter by the two guys both behind him according to the official story-they were five foot six and 128 pounds.(1.22.19)

Tracking the Leopard Meroz commentsIs Rebekah Roth for real?  Based on anecdotal conversations, and so called expert witnesses which we are not allowed to cross-examine, she concludes that the CIA actively recruited pilots and airline attendants solely on the basis that they had a great cover job. There are multitude numbers of great cover jobs, where CIA agents would never even have to show up for work, that would fool those meddling neighbors.  And what is her proof that she gives for asserting that three nations, maybe four, were involved in orchestrating the events on 9/11?

Some years ago I was a bank Trust Department Auditor and Officer.  When we audited a department, usually we took over the closest conference room.  However, if the department under audit had an empty desk, I would choose that work area over the conference room, as I liked to overhear the office gossip.  My co-workers used to give me a bad time, telling me that office gossip was hearsay, and what we needed was documented proof.  Exactly. I agreed totally with that; however, I had found that often office gossip and complaints gave vital clues as to what documentation ought to be reviewed in order to see if a procedural correction was needed.  

So I have no problem with anyone in the 9/11 Truth Movement discussing hearsay, as long as they are not inventing fake witnesses.  However, I do have a problem with such persons as Rebekah Roth who claims to have real expert witnesses looking at real evidence, yet this real evidence is withheld, and we are directed to read her fictional account so that we can experience her emotional reactions when this supposed evidence was reviewed by these supposed experts. 

The events on 9/11 represented a crime scene, and the withholding of real evidence and the testimony of real witnesses is tantamount to perverting the course of justice. 

Why should we respect the anecdotal assertions of  Rebekah Roth  who, for example, claims  that some Pentagon guy thinks she should testify before a Congressional Hearing, which may never come to pass in reality?   Whatever documentation she has which backs up her theories should be put out in public view.  It is outrageous when the public is told, “buy my book” and we are expected to distinguish between fiction and reality, based on what?  Hearsay which may represent the stories of a  fictitious witness?

TROLL ATTACKS?   Or as Rebekah Roth quotes in her Methodical Illusion book: “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize”. Voltaire

Doug Hagmann:  (1.33.33)  You’re getting a lot of push back, aren’t you?

Rebekah Roth:  Yes, I was extremely attacked by some trolls, some of which I later on found out, ah, are involved in Scientology. (laughing) (UI) he actually got some kind of web page but I had no idea, I never spent time on the internet really so I didn’t know trolls exist, I didn’t know what that was all about.  And oh you know what’s happened is so many people that were with DARPA in military intelligence, in air traffic control, pilots, flight attendants, pursers, so many of them came forward and helped me get the research done that  couldn’t have done without them. Ah, forward to Methodical Conclusion that there are so many of them that the trolls really mean nothing.  These are people that are jealous maybe because my radio audiences are huge uh and you know my book success was huge.  My first book went to #9 out of 8 and a half million on Amazon…..

(1.36.15)  Social Media is DARPA and CIA…(1.36.55) I thought the NSA was going to get me.  I thought they were going to kill me.

Tracking The Leopard Meroz comments:  Below is a link to Rebekah Roth’s page on who she considers to be the trolls who have attacked her. I do not locate anywhere where she has addressed the genuine concerns of those who have legitimately inquired into her background.  Some of her comments on this page seem hypocritical, since she panders to speculative theories on 9/11, and does so for a personal profit.  RebekahRoth.com/trolls

Rebekah Roth believes the passengers were gassed to death, and she puts this detail in her book after receiving a sign from God at a gas station.

Joe Hagmann: (1.37.44) …..We have over 3 emails asking “What happened to the people?”

Rebekah Roth: (1.37:51)  It’s in actually the last five chapters.  What I was telling you before when I was working with an air traffic controller, we actually found a, a FOIA Freedom of Information Act data that I found on a the internet actually.  It wasn’t one I had in all of my terabytes stuff.  And um we were reading through it together and it’s one of those last five-last three chapters and that’s the part I wasn’t sure I wanted to put in-well here’s the thing.  I was travelling with my husband and I had this and I was ready to end the book.  Do I want to put this detail in because this is what happened to the passengers.  After what happened to them at Westover, how they were uh most likely gassed and now that’s kind of the conclusion most everybody has come to- they used some sort of gas and the pepper spray or mace was a much stronger than that but they had the bodies, and what did they do with the bodies?  That, as well as the getaway plane- I’m giving away a lot of it.

Doug Hagmann:  Yeah.  You don’t have to go too far into that because it’s- the way you put it together it’s–WOW! (1.39:06)

Rebekah Roth:  And also this book is different….( 1.39:23)There’s all kinds of different stuff in there but when I said to my husband I don’t know if I want to put this detail that you’re asking me about in this book,  I’m afraid this is so mind blowing because I was really- I mean I found out about maybe ten days before-it was a detail I just didn’t know if I should put it in and so he was putting gas in the car and he never grabs his receipt but because we were traveling he grabbed the receipt and I kid you not.  The total and he just wanted to put a squirt in because we were going to go to a Costco or someplace and get gas in the morning before we left our location.  Nine dollars and eleven cents and he literally said to me, “that Guy up there wants you to put it in the book!”, so I said that would be it.  God has it.  Because since I started Methodical Illusion the uh it’s hard to explain this, the spiritual aspect of my life and that’s why people ask me, aren’t you afraid?  Well, I had all those proxy servers set up so people think I’m in Langley, Virginia, or they think I’m somewhere else.  I’m always four states away from where ever I’m pinging from.  But I thought it was for the NSA, so all the conspiracy nuts put all these conspiracies together about me, but really, I’m just a grandmother of eight, mother of five……(1.40:48)

The Reason for it all……

Rebekah Roth:  (1.43.53)  I died when I was fifteen.  Now I know why I came back.  Because I see puzzles and put them together….

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operation COFFEE, TEA, OR ME?

After taking a two month reprieve from the world of Christian Alternative Media,  I have decided to explore the world of 9/11 Truth-tellers. It has been many years since I have gone through the internet articles on this subject,  but as I recall,  everyone, no matter what theories they present,  considers themselves to be part of a “Truth” movement.

The September 11, 2001 attack on American economic and military iconic structures represented layer upon layer of criminal acts involving treason, murder, property destruction, guile and the mockery of justice and judgment.  The complexity of events on that day reflect a sort of mad genius as it affected the three levels of our world: the physical, the spiritual realm, and that of the human soul, itself. In the world of the occult sorcerer, this type of mastery is rewarded with a Triple Golden Crown representing the rulership of those three levels.  In truth, however, what was planned and executed was nothing to boast of, but represented the evil machinations of a coordinated group deserving of justice and a severe judgment.

I am going to start my 9/11 journey at the McGhee Tyson Airport, which is a public and military airport in Blount County, Tennessee. Why here?   Well, the first topic I want to consider involves Rebekah Roth and her radio co-host and husband, RamJet. And when I went to the internet to try to decipher what the letters in their self-publishing company, KTYS Media stood for, the only thing which popped up was the ICAO(International Civil Aviation Organization) airport code KTYS for the McGhee Tyson Airport. It is one of those odd coincidences, in that I have done several posts connected to this locality. But let us head on out from here to Las Vegas, Nevada where KTYS Media presumably had its start.

Michael Allen Harris AKA RamJet, radio co-host with Rebekah Roth

 

Rebekah Roth is the pen name of a woman who claims to have 30 years experience as an airline stewardess and international purser. She refuses to provide any proof, and says she worries about those nefarious three digit government agencies discovering her true identity.  As usual, they already know who she is and where she lives, and it is the rest of us who are left to search the net for clues.

Both husband and wife are fiction writers who have based their books on their personal experiences.  They self publish under the company,  KTYS Media.  I could not locate this business name in the Nevada Secretary of State business entity online records, even though this company claims it was located in Las Vegas. No one seems to know what KTYS stands for.

So since  we are about to take a flight of fancy involving the unprovable bona fides of Rebekah Roth’s airlines career, and her husband has a Facebook page called RamJet, which uses the aircraft photo above, let us see what KTYS Media is all about.

KTYS Media has designed their logo to highlight their name in a black, feminine script with a red heart motif supported by the letter Y. These letters are on a white background with a red border, overlaying a black background. Underneath, KTYSMedia claims to publish “Books that Invoke a Change of Heart or a Change of Mind“. The only book this website links to is  Methodical Illusion, written by Rebekah Roth with a publication date of November 3, 2014.

However, the website for KTYSMedia.com was created on January 22, 2010, almost 5 years earlier. On June 18, 2010 this Boutique Publishing House published a book called Windsweeping by Michael A. Harris.

The description of this novel at Amazon.com says, Windsweeping is driving a high performance vehicle with no particular destination in mind and absolutely no time constraint beckoning a return.  It is accomplished with a rather eclectic selection of music playing in the background as the experience evolves into the arena in which ideas are born, decisions are made and life is allowed to be filtered through an ambiance of solitude.  Following the death of his mentor, David Jarvis goes Windsweeping in an effort to put his life back into perspective.  Only this Windsweeping excursion isn’t like anything he has ever experienced.  Ultimately, he understands that men do not inherently know how to love and he welcomes an invitation to be taught all the dimensions of love by a woman whose gifts transcend time and space. Learning how to love others alters every aspect of David’s life and eventually leads him to recognize the woman of his dreams.  Windsweeping is a love story every woman will embrace, but it is written from a man’s perspective allowing all men everywhere to finally comprehend what the women in their lives have been trying to instill in them long before they were even born.

Michael Allen Harris AKA RAMJET,  the radio co-host of Rebekeh Roth, author of Methodical Illusion

In a video promoting his book, Michael Harris tries to display a casual sophistication which is appealing to women desperate to have a real conversation with a man. He does not appear to fit his image of himself as a macho RamJet;  however, he does manage to get 11 five star ratings from his eleven groupies on his Amazon.com book page.

In an article dated December 24, 2015, TruthRadioFrequency.com posted an expose by someone named Luckee 1 entitled, THIS IS TRUTH FREQUENCY! SCAMMERS WILL BE EXPOSED. The scammers are none other than Rebekah Roth and Michael A. Harris. This article reproduces a partial copy of an About Michael A. Harris page from freado.com/read/7572/windsweeping, which now cannot be found at the original site.

What was stated at freado.com about the author of Windsweeping is this: Michael grew up in the San Francisco bay area in the late sixties and early seventies.  He worked for a miniature golf course company through high school and during the summers in college.  That job allowed him to travel throughout California and Arizona and instilled in him a love for driving alone on long lonely stretches of road.  He holds a bachelors degree in Political Science and received an MBA from Arizona State.  Most of his career centered in the creation and development of software companies in the state of Washington.  He speaks fluent Finnish and would welcome any conversation in that unique language.  He is married to KoreAnn and has five grown children and a cat named CeeCee. His passion is to write and windsweep the rest of his life.

It appears that this is a second marriage for Michael Harris and for his present wife, KoreAnn, who had been previously married to an Iranian man. At some point the Harrises entered into a venture selling essential oils and had a website PhiXYourHealth.com which they created on March 14, 2013. They produced some videos to sell their products, displaying the photo shown above of Michael A. Harris and someone named Monika Gainor, who has the same voice as Rebekah Roth.

This same photo also is displayed elsewhere as representing KoreAnn Ashlie, who held a real estate broker license #79620 in Washington State which was first issued on Nov. 12, 2004 and expired Dec. 25, 2009.

After Rebekah Roth began promoting her 9/11 based novel Methodical Illusion via numerous Alternative Media radio hosts, some began to question her multiple identities and credentials. One of the best of these investigations was done by Kurt Richard Haskell who published this expose on his Facebook page.

In addition to exploring the question of whether Rebekeh Roth ever was an airline stewardess as she claims, Haskell takes the reader through his various findings on her many aliases. Kurt  Haskell makes an interesting observation about Michael Harris, the husband of Rebekah Roth AKA Monika Gainor AKA KoreAnn Ashlie/Harris AKA Sara, etc. etc. Windsweeping, as well as the Methodical Illusion series, are fiction based on the author’s real experiences, and we are left to our own devices trying to discern fiction from fact.

Haskell comments,  “Michael A. Harris talks about how he developed a software program to determine if people are lying by compiling all data related to them.  This sounds like something the CIA/NSA would do and by his own words the book is based on real events”.

Rebekah Roth makes reference in her first novel to her husband’s book Windsweeping and to the essential oils products they sold.   I cannot understand why she claims she is safeguarding the identity of her family by using a pen name, when she herself reveals verifiable links to her family.

There does not seem to be any proof that Rebekah Roth spent 30 years as an airline stewardess and international purser, although several persons have requested such information from her.   So if her bona fides are a figment of an active imagination, and she has a history of using multiple identities, perhaps all such data should be analyzed by her husband’s software program to determine if she fits the profile of a Liar.

In addition to writing 3 novels, Methodical Illusion (November 3, 2014), Methodical Deception (August 28, 2015), and Methodical Conclusion (July 12, 2016), Rebekah Roth offers subscriptions, the highest membership costing $75/year,  so that one can gain the “privilege” of going behind the scenes to her Behind The Galley Curtain where insider information, including daily morning news commentaries by her and RamJet can be heard.  These marketing geniuses have not only offered their 9/11 theories for a price, but they have priced the Kindle copy of her book at $9.11, which is certainly an indicator of the lighthearted approach they take to that infamous day of injustice.

Rebekah Roth was subject to several exposes by Alternative Media radio hosts and stations at the end of 2015, but here we are almost a year and a half later, and certain radio hosts still have her on their shows, without addressing the peculiarities of her personal story.

Who endorsed her first book in the beginning, lending credibility to the Rebekah Roth façade?  Why Douglas J. Hagmann and John B. Wells, of course. These two men are also known for coming to the aid of Mike Kerr AKA Mike Whitestone, who also had a reputational problem.  And then there was that promotion by these two radio hosts of that fraud known to most as V-the Guerrilla Economist.  The written endorsements, can be found at  readroth.com.As seen below in the second endorsement, an anonymous pilot gives is afraid to give his name.  What kind of endorsement is that? But the most interesting endorsement is the first one.This first endorsement is from Barbara Honegger, former White House Policy Analyst and Dept. of Defense Sr. Military Affairs Journalist 2000-2011.  Barbara Honegger has quite a long and distinguished career in the public eye. Here is a photo of Barbara Honegger as she gave a speech in recent years on 9/11 in Seattle.

Barbara Honneger speaking in Seattle on the events of 9/11

Rebekeh Roth on the April 7, 2017 Hagmann Report

When I compared the above two photos, I felt prompted to ask, has Rebekah Roth colored and styled her hair, chosen a similar red lipstick and a similar eye glass frame so that she looks like Barbara Honegger?  What happened to the blond Monika Gainor/ KoreAnn Ashlie look?  This woman is a Mistress of Disguises.  Perhaps she wants you to subconsciously place her on the same level of expertise as Barbara Honegger.  Rebekeh Roth hides her 9/11 theories in a fictional format, to exempt herself from footnotes and other research paper requirements, and refuses to provide evidence of her bona fides; yet she claims that she is a 9/11 expert.

On this flight of fancy, it appears we cannot get a decent cup of coffee or tea, only the “me” of a fictional stewardess story. Go read the “Look Inside” pages of Methodical Illusion at Amazon.com.  What you will find at the very beginning of this novel is a racy portrayal of the life of airline stewardesses and pilots.

In the next post I am going to review the  April 4, 2017 Hagmann Report video interview of Rebekah Roth, and listen to what she says.