Robert David Steele lawsuit: Documents 98 & 99 concerning Susan A. Lutzke aka Susan Holmes address of record

On April 19, 2019, Document 98 was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division in the Robert David Steele, et. al. vs Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit.  Document 99 was filed on April 22, 2019.

Document 98 (46 pages) envelope of documents mailed to Susan Lutzke showing moved and forwarded  rds doc 98 419 2019

Document 99 (5 pages) Notice of Harmless Error Pursuant to FRCP Rule 61 by Intervenor-Applicant D. George Sweigert  rds doc 99 422 2019

 

Advertisements

The Amending of a Lawsuit to include Susan (Holmes) Lutzke, as Queen Tut

Queen Tut, who was named as one of three defendants in a defamation lawsuit filed by Robert David Steele, has presented the plaintiff with the very real problem of accurately identifying her legal name and location. It is now generally believed that Susan Lutzke aka Susan Holmes of Fort Collins, Colorado is the voice of the woman who Steele had attempted to obtain a default judgment against.  However, the fact that it was Carla A. Howell’s name on the lawsuit as Queen Tut, rather than Susan Lutzke’s, caused the Judge to rule against that motion.

On March 25, 2018, the Plaintiffs’ attorney Steven S. Biss filed a Motion For Leave to File Amended Complaint with the Federal Civil Court. This Motion addresses, first of all, the correction which was needed on the lawsuit title which is now proposed to be Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network v. Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron and Susan A. Lutzke a/k/a/ “Queen Tut”.

Secondly, this lawsuit is one in which the Plaintiffs are demanding a trial by jury, and the amount of “compensatory damages, statutory damages (three-fold the damages sustained), and punitive damages” has now been proposed to be increased from $15,350,000.00 to $18,350,000.00.

The complaint has been expanded to read “defamation per se, insulting words, business conspiracy, common-law conspiracy, tortious interference with contract and business expectancies, intentional affliction of emotional distress, personal trespass by computer and computer harassment, and unauthorized use of name and picture.” These last phrases, which I have emphasized, are the additions made to the original complaint. The proposed amended complaint has been expanded from 37 pages to about 99, to include supporting examples of words and actions taken by the defendants in the months following the filing of the original complaint on September 1, 2017.

The Introduction to the proposed Amended Complaint provides several new observations of interest noting the Defendants’ “egregious disrespect for the law is eclipsed only by their actual malice and desire to injure the Plaintiffs.”  The concluding sentence states, “This case presents a new age of defamation and a unique breed of lawless and malicious conduct.”  To read the proposed amendment, click on this link:  rds lawsuit 325 2018 motion to amend complaint

While it is well known that I do not favor Robert David Steele because his political and religious views greatly differ from my own, neither have I supported any of the defendant’s words and actions by which they have introduced questionable information into the public domain. My sympathies in this legal matter are strictly reserved for the Judge who must sort through the arguments and evidence presented by both sides, and determine if this case should proceed to a trial by jury.

My continuing interest in this legal dispute stems from my concern for several trends which I see in American society, including the lowering of the quality of public discourse on the various internet platforms, the constant stating of accusations against others without providing any supporting evidence, and the use of anonymous names which promote a sense of safety for those who spread lies. It should be of interest to the general public how the American judicial system views defamation claims, especially since most persons now, including juveniles, are routinely using social media platforms to express their opinions.

The pivotal event which caused me to first observe the plaintiff and the three defendants occurred on June 14, 2017 when the Port of Charleston, South Carolina was closed due to information that was given by George Webb on Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource The Truth show, involving a warning of a possible dirty bomb aboard the Maersk Memphis. Also around that time frame, several “conflicts” erupted concerning Defango, Dave (Sweigert) Acton, George (Sweigert) Webb, Jason Goodman and Trish Negron, along with a few others on other matters. And it was about this point in time that Queen Tut made her entrance onto the scene via The Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel.

Because of the Maersk Memphis dirty bomb incident arising from George Webb’s secret insider source, there were those who speculated that this whole situation was an Operation created for the purposes of restricting free speech on the internet. If this speculation has any merit, the question is, under whose authority was an Op set in motion? But the basic problem with this type of question is that the general public does not have the means to investigate, to discover hidden facts and relationships, to uncover money trails or any other type of information which is not open sourced. Thus the Robert David Steele lawsuit does present an interesting situation because it centers on internet defamation, and thus it falls into that general area of concern over what the boundaries of free speech really are.

I have read comments that assert that Robert David Steele is not a former CIA employee, as he claims.  Yet these persons never address the fact that there is a documented record on Steele, going back years on the internet,  that is entirely consistent with his published resume, including his public interactions with high ranking military officials, his government contracts, and his writings. Because of that public record, I find that Robert David Steele’s biography is credible.  I also have stated that he has provided much information on what he believes, and on his projects, so  that anyone can form a reasoned opinion about whether or not to financially support his endeavors.

And then there are the accusations and joking references that Jason Goodman and George Webb have connections to MOSSAD. All this creates an aura of CIA versus MOSSAD, or CIA impersonators versus MOSSAD impersonators. In all of this there is also the anti Zionist versus the pro Zionist thread running through this adversarial set-up. Thus there is little of the middle ground, which is the stance of the ordinary American citizen, represented in the panoramic view of the background of how this lawsuit came into existence in the first place.

What we do know is that on Jun 13, 2017, one day prior to the Port of Charleston, South Carolina incident, George Webb met with Robert David Steele at a restaurant and together they appeared on Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel,  where several thousand dollars was raised for Steele’s #UNRIG campaign. This joint effort was so successful that Robert David Steele was scheduled for an interview with Jason Goodman and Patricia Negron two days later. However, because of the involvement of George Webb and Jason Goodman in communicating the false information which led to the closing down of the Charleston port on June 14th, Robert David Steele cancelled that interview.

According to Steele, this withdrawing of his association from Crowdsource The Truth, was the beginning of the subsequent friction he had with Goodman and Negron.  His  lawsuit complaint asserts that Queen Tut, a woman believed to be known as Carla A. Howell, began acting together and in concert with Goodman and Negron on June 15, 2017.

However, the first documented video of Queen Tut’s involvement that is noted in Steele’s lawsuit  seems to be June 26, 2017. It is also noted that Jason Goodman officially withdrew his endorsement of Robert David Steele on July 1, 2017. Coincidentally, it was on July 1, 2017 that Susan (Holmes) Lutzke, who is now accused by Robert David Steele of being Queen Tut, lost her son Jeremy Holmes when he was shot by police in Fort Collins, Colorado. This confrontation with the police, came about after his mother had phoned 911 to report that her son, armed with a large knife, was attempting to make his way to his brother’s home to fulfil a death threat.

So almost from the start of the Queen Tut arrival on the stage of Crowdsource The Truth, this tragic undercurrent of sorrow and anger arising from the death of Susan Lutzke’s son is a factor in her conduct  which needs to be kept in remembrance, as we ponder these events in hindsight.

On March 17, 2018, Jason Goodman published on his Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel a 23 minute video called Libel, Lies and Lawsuits-Queen Tut Evidence Exposed. Although some of this video had sound problems, overall the information and commentary which Goodman presents is worth considering.

Jason Goodman is seen walking along a city street with people laughing in the background, and so I pick up his commentary at the 1.17 mark as he reflects on more recent events relating to the Robert David Steele lawsuit and Queen Tut’s actions.

Jason Goodman:  “…Robert David Steele, I call him a liar, because he lied and presented evidence that he’s lied, he’s spoken about his ridiculous lawsuit and he claims to have through discovery learned that I am paid by MOSSAD.  This is a lie.  Robert David Steele has not entered Discovery with his lawsuit, and I am not paid by MOSSAD and he has no evidence of that, therefore he’s lying and I’m calling him out on his lie and anyone who wants to defend that needs to present evidence to support his claim.”

Tracking Meroz comment:  In the screenshot below  is an excerpt of a November 21, 2017  ExoNews reposting of an article written by Robert David Steele dated November 7, 2017 called “How the Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics”. Notice that Steele speculates that legal discovery will reveal monthly payments to Goodman at around $3,000 month.  I do not know if there is another document that supports Goodman’s statement that RDS had claimed he already had begun the Discovery process in his lawsuit.

excerpt from Robert David Steele article, “How The Deep State Controls Social Media & Digitally Assassinates Critics”

Jason Goodman:  “This is a very simple process.  Evidence.  Jake Morphonios, would you think I am lying? You have no evidence to prove it, to show that I’m lying. Show that I’m wrong.  Let’s focus on this lawsuit, because there’s been a lot of activity coming from Queen Tut.  Susan Lutzke is what she told me her name was, but then she also sometimes goes by Susan Holmes on, enough there was this big development you know she spread first the lie that I had somehow wanted Trish to pay a lawyer or force Trish to pay a lawyer or plan to base my defense on Trish spending money on a lawyer.  This is not true.”

“I have answered Robert David Steele some stupid childish complaint Pro Se, meaning “defending myself”, your lawyer.  Now Trish could have done that.  I didn’t tell her to hire a lawyer.  I didn’t tell Trish my legal defense, we’re just not affiliated.  I have no responsibilities, no responsibility for her.  She’s an adult woman who can make her own decisions.  She could have answered the suit Pro Se, she could have ignored it like Susan has, and it was up to Trish to do whatever she wanted so this whole stupid narrative that Susan is trying to build that I’m somehow doing something to Trish or that Robert David Steele’s lawyer not doing anything after I answered Robert David Steele’s ridiculous complaint, you know she’s trying to make it look like something is going on.  So let’s look at what recently happened.”

“There’s this website called PACER which let’s you, it’s you know, public access to court electronic records.  You can read everything you want to read about the moronic lawsuit from Robert David Steele, including a letter recently sent by someone on behalf of Queen Tut….(shows the February 21, 2018 Mercia Francis letter including birth certificate in a previously taped session which was inserted into this March 17, 2018 commentary.)

Tracking Meroz commentary:  It would appear that Jason Goodman in his March 17th broadcast,  had not checked the PACER records in early March, and so like me, missed that the Judge had issued an Order regarding the Mercia Francis letters.  This Order can be viewed in the Tracking Meroz post dated March 22, 2018.

Jason Goodman: (7.20)…”Queen Tut told me the story that the police killed her son.  I think she said it was the Fort Collins police and she also told me that she went to a protest at Colorado State University, and you can see in the lower right hand corner here, I’ve placed an image that someone took at that protest which is Susan Lutzke holding a sign that says, “KILL ALL POLICE- THEY ARE KILLING US”….”.Jason Goodman provides a clip of the November 7, 2017 City of Fort Collins meeting (FCTV) and at the 8.21 mark citizen participation is allowed, and Susan (Lutzke) Holmes is given permission to speak. Tracking Meroz comment:  The date of this appearance is coincidentally the same date noted by ExoNews for the Robert David Steele article of November 7, 2017).

Susan Lutzke Holmes: (8.24 mark of Fort Collins video)  “My name is Susan Holmes.  I have a story, that supports the Native American Awareness Month.  My son, Jeremy Holmes was an enrolled member of the Native American Tribe.  He was 19 years old.  he was slaughtered, shot to death SIX TIMES by the CSU campus police officer and by Fort Collins police officer.  That is how Fort Collins treats Native American people.”

“My son, I’m here to clear my son’s name and I’m going to make a special request from this council to give the time to do it because he has been discredited and destroyed by the DA’s report.  The DA’s opinion.  The DA used words taken from me in a traumatic state when I found he was dead in a hospital to use in his DA’s opinion to justify the slaughter of my son.  So I’m asking that you give me the time to clear his name and to talk about his life and his death in Fort Collins because the community needs to know the truth about what is happening here.”

“I, when the DA’s opinion is the only narrative that is existing right now about what happened to my son and is completely filled with a number of false statements and I can prove that.  However, when I went to the Coloradoan to try to prove to have them to purchase half a page or a page to disabuse the false statements in the DA’s Opinion, they refused to let me buy that time to write that article so that I could inform the community about what’s REALLY happening in this community about what the police are doing to Native American teenagers who are in a mental health crisis.”

Photo of Jeremy Holmes at gunmemorial.org

“I have been living in HELL for four months since my son was shot to death.  His spine was shattered, his chest was pierced, his femoral artery was torn and the rest of the bullets just hit wherever.  He bled out on the street on Prospect.  He did not deserve to die that way.  He was an incredible human being.  He was brilliant, he graduated with honors from high school.  He was in the middle of designing a game, he was an IT kid, he was registered for college.  He was an incredible human being and he did not deserve to die like that.”.

Male voice of Fort Collins city council member: (11.30) “Ma’am, thank you.”

Susan (Lutzke) Holmes: “I’m NOT done!  I want the time to talk about my son’s life and his death…”. (The council decides to take a recess).

Here is a link to the July 18, 2017 Opinion of Clifford E. Riedel, District Attorney of the Eighth Judicial District of Colorado on the shooting death of Jeremy Holmes.  There are also several websites which show the police camera footage of their engagement with the knife wielding Jeremy Holmes, which resulted in his death.

Jason Goodman:  (12.23) “…in the DA’s report found that the police acted appropriately, but Queen Tut insists otherwise, and she also would instruct the college students at the University of Colorado to kill all police….”.

Jason Goodman: (13.03) “…the point is Susan Lutzke Holmes Tut has either submitted a fraudulent document to a United States Court, that letter written saying that she’s suffering from dementia and is 80 years old.  She’s either lying to the Court or she’s been lying to all of us the whole time and that woman standing there in Fort Collins, Colorado is not Susan Lutzke or Queen Tut.  I don’t know what to make of this, but I do know that Susan Lutzke Tut Queen Tut whatever this lady’s name is, Susan Holmes is a liar who has lied to you to try to convince you that I have committed crimes, that I am involved in pedophilia.   She has presented no evidence, OK, and here’s the thing.”

“This is a message I want to send to everyone.  If you don’t like it when I address these accusations, I understand.  But you don’t have to watch and it’s your right to not watch, but I need to keep doing this because you see this is the way these people operate.  They put out fake information. They put anonymous posts, places like 4chan.  Somebody shared with me a post from an anonymous person who says, oh a friend of mine connected with Jason on Tinder and she’s 15 and Jason said this and she said that and Jason was sexting a 15 year old.  This is untrue. (gives real life examples of posting fake documents).”

Jason Goodman: (15.39)…  “Each of these people are complicit in what is now an organized operation where they are working together to defame me, to slander me, and to harass me and they’re doing this not because I’m guilty of any of the horrendous things that they’ve accused me of.  It’s because I’m having guests on Crowdsource The Truth who are bringing forth evidence that do things like help in the firing of Andrew McCabe….”

Jason Goodman: (18.10)  “I really hope someone in law enforcement in Fort Collins, Colorado or in Virginia where that false document was submitted to the Court, is there a lawyer out there who can tell me what kind of crime is it to submit a false document to the Court because there was a time that I spoke to Susan Lutzke Holmes Tut on the phone almost every day!  And that woman’s not 80, I think she’s like 50 something or 60 and the woman that we saw in those videos looks like she’s about 60…”.

Tracking Meroz commentary: 

Jason Goodman has presented an interesting commentary with regard to some of the words of Queen Tut and Robert David Steele, which he claims are unfounded statements, not backed by evidence. Also he has provided some of the back story on Susan Lutzke which helps us to better understand how she has presented herself in the public arena.

It must be recalled that it was Jason Goodman who first introduced Susan Lutzke to his audience under a false name that he invented, as a cover to hide her true identity as his journalistic source.  Subsequent to that, he was aware of the circumstances surrounding her son’s death, and this fact had been alluded to on one of their videos. Perhaps she continued on with her research on Robert David Steele as a way to refocus her thoughts away from her personal tragedy.  

If you view the police camera footage which justifies the actions which the officers were forced to take, one has to agree with the conclusions made by the District Attorney who evaluated all the facts of this situation.  It is apparent from later public comments and actions of Susan (Holmes) Lutzke,  that she did not possess the grace to acknowledge the truth of the untenable situation in which her son had placed the officers in.  Instead, she chose to falsely accuse others for the type of death which Jeremy Holmes brought upon himself. 

I have a soft spot in my heart for Susan Lutzke’s loss of her 19 year old son.  But the hard truth about life and its burdens, is that it is never excusable to falsely accuse,  or to wrongly shift the burden of blame onto others, when the facts and evidence suggest otherwise.  Because this is a Christian commentary, I do not consider this story to be just a matter of “winning” a war of words in a lawsuit, but rather the importance of making right judgments in the interest of real justice.  Our own words go deep into the very heart of what we are in the sight of God.  One day all of us will have to give an account to God for our words and deeds, and that event ought to be soberly considered by every person, as we freely communicate on the internet.