Who Shall Plead for Queen Tut?

Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?  Job 38:2

It was May 29, 2017, and in the twilight, in the evening, in the black and dark night (Pr. 7:9), the Watchers at SocialBlade.com observed a blip on the screen. Something is going on…a shipload of Subs has arrived in the YouTube Galaxy…it’s hovering over Jason Goodman’s New York apartment…!

It was May 29, 2017 and  the sudden arrival of 4,260 CrowdSource the TruthiCONS set off the Blip alert at the SocialBlade.com  console.

Then on June 4, 2017 alarm bells clanged as the Mother Ship which had been sighted overhead opened its doors and 207,210 zig zagging Rage Walkers descended…All humor aside, the statistical blip shown in the above screen shots is something to ponder.  At the end of April 2017, George Webb and Jason Goodman had joined together as a broadcast journalism team, and along with Patricia Negron, they began to look into the Seth Rich story. There were other stories swirling about this YouTube neighborhood at that time, so let’s narrow down our focus to the day prior to the June 14, 2017 shutting down of the Port of Charleston due to a false report from Deep Uranium to George Webb  and then to Jason Goodman, which became a public spectacle on YouTube.

So on June 13, 2017, Robert David Steele and George Webb met at a restaurant, and decided to do a spur of the moment live stream fundraiser on the Jason Goodman YouTube channel. According to Document 34 filed March 7, 2018 in the Robert David Steele lawsuit, one of those listeners of that fund-raiser just so happened to be Susan Lutzke (soon after, to become well-known as Queen Tut), who donated $25 to Steele’s nonprofit corporation,  Earth Intelligence Network.

Mr. Cati and the Shadow of Death

Also on June 13, 2017, Mr. Cati (pronounced cat-eye) was in a panic, thinking that he was a Targeted Individual by the Shadow of Death.  As a precautionary move, he  prepared a report called The CYA-To Whom It May Concern-Discussion, which was uploaded the next day on YouTube.

At the .23 mark, Mr. Cati says, “Have I got something for you. Now this report isn’t your typical Mr. Cati report, but it is a report that’s of importance to many of you who are currently confused about many of the things that are going on involving George Webb, Jason Goodman, Dave Acton, Montagraph, Lift the Veil, Defango, all with regard to the Seth Rich investigation and many, even Trish Negron- these people have all been involved in the previous days recently, leading up to today in events that have set certain actions in motion, and since those actions that have been placed into motion are dangerous, I’m going to do this report as a living testimony to leave a record of how these events transpired, because should I die in the immediate future, and I’m going to tell you why…”.

(2.44)  “I believe the Shadow of Death was supposed to visit me today and because it didn’t, I need to explain some things and leave a video record should something happen.”  At the 23.42 mark, after Mr. Cati has given all of the excruciating details of the previous days, and stated his disclaimers, he says that he believes that Jason Goodman’s angry tirade against Defango might have been inspired by the comment which Mr. Cati had posted on Montagraph’s video…

Ahhh, well, Mr. Cati is still around, and so is George Webb who Mr. Cati thought was going to be done in soon after.  Those were strange days, but as I looked around this particular YouTube neighborhood back then, it was not difficult to see the legal problems developing which have resulted in two federal civil lawsuits against Jason Goodman.

Against that backdrop, the focus of today’s article is the anonymous handle, Queen Tut, which was originally created by Jason Goodman to hide the identity of Susan Lutzke, whose research on Robert David Steele was highlighted on Crowdsource the Truth. As a result of those public reports and commentary, Queen Tut, Jason Goodman and Patricia Negron found themselves facing a defamation lawsuit.

Two months ago on September 9, 2018,  an entry of default was entered against Susan Lutzke because she declined to answer the civil complaint against her. Her rationale for this was stated in February 2018, when her Queen Tut handle explained, “…because you never take a stand against deception, what you have to do is move around deception.  You have to beat them at their own game.”

In an article I wrote on September 29, 2017, I analyzed a Trello board which Queen Tut  displayed to back up an assertion which she had made against Robert David Steele. If you want to see one of the methods by which she creates a credible looking dissimulation, you might want to read that article. I am not a fan of Robert David Steele’s political, philosophical and religious opinions, yet Queen Tut’s underhanded method of “proving” her unfounded claim, placed me in the position of having to publicly take a stand on behalf of Steele.

One must remember that shortly after Susan Lutzke donated money to Robert David Steele’s nonprofit corporation, she turned against Steele to publicly revile him, in concert with Jason Goodman.  So in essence, Lutzke was an inside operator in this whole peculiar drama.

Recently, under the guise of a different anonymous handle, “Albert of Finland”,  Lutzke had the nerve to mock one of my readers, asking him if the name he commented under was his real name.  It is, and I know his credentials.  She also accusingly asked him, “How come you never talk about the rogue CIA Double Agent RDS…? This she asks, when she herself likes to play both sides of the fence. Susan Lutzke continually promotes unproven accusations while hiding behind various internet handles.  She most definitely is not the “persecuted, revealer of truth” which she claims to be.

On September 16, 2018, I wrote an article entitled, THE OATH Above All Oaths of Robert David Steele, Chief Counsel for the International Tribunal for Natural Justice.  12 comments have been left on that post, and in today’s article I am going to address just one of them, by De Vivas.  De Vivas replied to a comment by Queen Tut, and she stated, “I have communicated with Queen Tut a number of times”, and ends by saying “I salute you Queen Tut”. Since De Vivas is another anonymous handle emanating from the same IP address as Queen Tut, it would seem that Susan Lutzke enjoys talking to herself in her imaginary world.

Using one IP address, comments have been left on this blog under eight different anonymous names:  De Vivas, Albert of Finland, Bissel (Chief Counsel RDS), Harris, Ha Ji Won, Grace, Queen Tut and Avery.  I do not mind readers using anonymous names, so long as it is not used as a cover for libel, or to manipulate facts in order to promote a false narrative. On my Contact page, I state, I welcome any comments, even those which disagree with me, as long as you sincerely explain your position.”

Because Tracking the Leopard Meroz is my website, let this serve as notice that I will not allow my blog to  be taken over by disingenuous covert manipulators operating in the comment section. I encourage critical thinking based on facts and evidence. Speculations and conclusions, especially when made by anonymous handles, which have no factual basis, and are promoted for the sole purpose of denigrating  responsible persons who write under their real name, are not welcome here.

With that said, here is the De Vivas comment under discussion today:   In response to De Vivas’ desire that this blog write an expose on attorney Biss, I replied that I had already addressed him (regarding his disciplinary actions) in a September  2017 article on Robert David Steele, called Operation WHIPLASH.

The Queen Tut Summons issue can be divided into two timelines:  the initial Complaint filed on September 1, 2017 against Queen Tut/ Carla Howell, and the Amended Complaint filed  April 13, 2018 against Queen Tut/Susan Lutzke.  So let’s go through the applicable documents, one by one.

I. On September 1, 2017 Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network became plaintiffs in a federal defamation lawsuit against three defendants:  Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron, and Queen Tut, a person believed to be known as Carla A. Howell. Steven S. Biss (VSB #32972) of Charlottesville, Virginia is counsel for the plaintiffs.

II.  The original 37 page complaint was for $15,350,000 in damages. In the introduction, the complaint explained, “This is not a case about First Amendment or protected speech.  This is a case about the conscious and deliberate destruction of a man’s untarnished name and impeccable reputation by social media vigilantes and trolls.  The Defendants are the poster children of actual malice – stalking the Plaintiffs on the Internet, publishing and republishing videos and enticing their subscribers and confederates to make and publish false and defamatory statements, all calculated to injure the Plaintiff’s reputation and business.”

III.  On page 8 sec. 7, under Parties, the Defendant, “Queen Tut”, is described as a person believed to be Carla A. Howell of New Jersey who is a political activist. The Complaint references a Wikipedia page for Howell, but does not provide insight into why Steele thought she was Queen Tut.  We are left to speculate that perhaps Steele and Howell were in opposition to each other through their Libertarian Party association in the past. The description of Howell goes on to declare,   “At all times relevant to this action, Queen Tut acted in concert with and as an agent, alter ego or instrumentality of Goodman and Negron.” I note that the complaint states that “Goodman and Negron are sophisticated high net worth individuals who have sufficient assets and net worth to pay punitive damages in the maximum amount permitted under Virginia law”. No mention is given with regard to the net worth of Carla A. Howell.

IV.  The next reference in the court docket to Queen Tut is Document 5 filed September 8, 2017. In this entry, which is 7 days after the initial complaint was filed, the document represents a Proposed Summons to Queen Tut a/k/a Susan A. Lutzke of Fort Collins, CO.  On the same day, Document 6 reflects that 3 summons were issued as to the defendants, including Queen Tut a/k/a Susan A. Lutzke. Also on the same day Document 7 was filed for a proposed summons for Queen Tut a/k/a Carla Howell of Moorestown, NJ. This was followed by a Summons being issued in Document 10 on September 12, 2017 for Queen Tut a/k/a Carla Howell.

Thus within the first week of this lawsuit being filed in federal court, the Plaintiff has identified two different persons as the defendant Queen Tut. But only one of them has been officially declared as a party to the lawsuit, and that is Carla Howell. At that time, the lawsuit had not named Queen Tut a/k/a Susan A. Lutzke as a party to the lawsuit; thus it was improper to issue a summons against Lutzke.

Anyone who has listened to the Queen Tut interviews on Jason Goodman’s YouTube channel knows that there was only one very distinctive voice behind this anonymous persona. Thus, it would be highly improbable that there could be two different women posing as Queen Tut.

V. On November 2, 2017,  Document 18 is entered on the docket as “Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Queen Tut”. A letter dated November 1, 2017 is attached from Steven S. Biss’ office to the U. S. District Court Clerk stating, “Enclosed is the Summon and Proof of Service of the Summons and Complaint upon defendant, Queen Tut c/o Carla Howell, which I am returning “Unexecuted” because we have determined through additional research that the person calling herself “Queen Tut” is Susan A. Lutzke.

Note that this letter to the court is dated almost 8 weeks after the September 8, 2017 Document 5 was submitted which first named Queen Tut as Susan A. Lutzke. In this period of time, the Plaintiff and his Counsel did not add Lutzke as a party to this lawsuit, nor did they terminate Carla A. Howell as a defendant.

Next we see Document 19 dated November 6, 2017 “Summons Returned Executed” stating Queen Tut had been served on October 25, 2017 and answer was due November 15, 2017. An Affidavit of Service is attached claiming that documents were left at the door of an address claimed to be the abode of Susan A. Lutzke. At this point we must note that the Summons In A Civil Action to Lutzke contains a false statement, as it begins, “A lawsuit has been filed against you.” That statement is false as Lutzke was not a named defendant in this lawsuit at that point in time; it was Carla A. Howell who was the person identified on the lawsuit as Queen Tut.

VI.  90 days after it was claimed that Susan A. Lutzke was served with a summons, Document 30 dated January 23, 2018 is a Request for Entry of Default as to “Queen Tut” a/k/a Susan A. Lutzke by Earth Intelligence Network and Robert David Steele.  In this 7 page document, several claims are made, including that Lutzke was duly served in accordance with Virginia Code. Further, the Plaintiffs complain that after the September 1, 2017 complaint that “defendant’s Lutzke and Goodman continued to publish false and defamatory statements”…and display a video where they discuss the Summons…and the service of process.

On page 4 of Document 30, the plaintiffs complain that “Goodman and Lutzke call Plaintiff’s Complaint “a fake lawsuit from a real idiot”. Then counsel proceeds to delineate a timeline of events to conclude that Lutzke has not answered or otherwise responded to Plaintiffs’ Complaint…therefore she is in default.  As we have noted, in agreement with our commenter De Vivas, Susan Lutzke’s name was not even on the lawsuit, and she was therefore not under a legal responsibility to respond.

VII.  Next we enter into the Twilight Zone of this lawsuit when a  letter was received as Document 31 on February 21, 2018 from Mercia Francis who claimed to be writing on behalf of her mother Queen Tut. This letter provides a birth certificate for a woman born in 1937 who does not live in Colorado, and stating that Queen Tut does not want to give her address because she is fearful that Robert David Steele as a former CIA man, might send someone to harm her.

Document 32 filed February 23, 2018 by Steven S. Biss is a letter addressed to the Judge, the Hon. M. Hannah Lauck, regarding the Mercia Francis letter. He addresses his uneventful research into the identity of Mercia Francis, and observes that Susan A. Lutzke does not suffer from dementia.  Biss documents that Lutzke as Queen Tut has set up a Twitter account.  Some of the images shown have Queen Tut referring to Robert David Steele as “the greatest plagiarizer and liar on the internet”, etc.

Document 33 filed March 1, 2018 represents a second letter from Mercia Francis on behalf of her mother, Queen Tut.  She has included 2 documents which she wants filed with the court which include a statement from the owner of the property where the summons had been served on Lutzke, plus Robert David Steele’s article called, How the Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics.  Document 34 is a letter filed on the court docket by the plaintiff and counsel in response to letters 31 and 33.

VIII. Thankfully, on March 9, 2018 in Document 35, United States District Judge M. Hannah Lauck issued an Order addressing the several issues which we have been observing in this lawsuit. Judge Lauck explains Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 (a) to the plaintiffs, noting that their complaint “does not identify Lutzke as a defendant.” She concludes therefore that, “Lutzke is not ‘a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought,’ and entry of default is not appropriate. Fed. R. Civ. p. 55(a).  Accordingly, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Motion for Entry of Default.”

The Order does not speculate as to why attorney Biss failed to change the identity of Queen Tut to Susan Lutzke on the lawsuit once he became convinced that Carla Howell was misidentified as a defendant. This negligence on the part of seasoned attorney Biss is disturbing, and I do not know if Carla Howell had contacted Biss or the Court about this misidentification.  Since Queen Tut, in a Jason Goodman broadcast, had once claimed that she had called Ms. Howell, it would appear that Howell had become aware of the accusations which had been made against her.  This error continued for almost eight months before it was corrected on the court docket!

In addition, the Hon. Judge Lauck notes that the Court has received two documents submitted anonymously, explaining that “the Court will not accept documents sent anonymously and in violation of the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure, which govern parties -and nonparties- in an action.” It was ordered that these documents remain on the record, but not accessible to the public.”  She noted in footnote 2 that the Court was concerned that docket numbers 31 and 33 contain internal inconsistencies suggesting that they were not filed in good faith.  The Court also restricted 32 and 34 as “Court Only”, as they represent the responses of attorney Biss to the anonymous claims.

The Judge probably “set aside” as Court Only documents, the Mercia Francis letters and the Plaintiff’s response, so that this case could proceed forward. At some point in the future, these documents may be inserted into the proceedings, if necessary. Although these documents cannot be presently downloaded on PACER, the Judge closed the barn door after the horse was let out.  Both this blog, and that of Steele’s had published or referred to those now hidden from public view documents.

IX.  On April 13, 2018 an Amended Complaint (rds 413 2018 doc 39)  was filed which added Susan A. Lutzke a/k/a Queen Tut as a defendant, and upped the damages another $3 million, on top of the original $15 plus million.   Carla Howell’s name was terminated as a party in this lawsuit on April 19, 2018.

Documents 40, 41 regard a new summons to Susan Lutzke at a new address in Fort Collins, CO. Affidavit of Service was shown in Document 61 on July 25, 2018. Document 64-1 filed on August 21, 2018 represents a letter send via email and regular mail to Susan Lutzke stating she had been served with process, and noting the videos which demonstrated that she had “actual knowledge of the pendency of the lawsuit”.  The rest of the letter discusses the continuing efforts of Queen Tut to “disparage and defame” the Plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs entered a motion for entry of default against defendant, Susan A. Lutzke a/k/a “Queen Tut”. This was granted in Document 66 on September 6, 2018.

X.  In conclusion, Susan A. Lutzke was, in the end, properly served with the Robert David Steele lawsuit.  She chose not to respond to the complaint in regard to her own words and actions, despite the fact that the Carla Howell error allowed her an extra eight months to respond to the complaint. Since the other two defendants were properly served in the beginning, they had less time than Queen Tut did, to answer the complaint against them.

In regard to Susan Lutzke’s self imposed martyrdom, one cannot complain about due process while at the same time actively evading the means which our nation’s laws provide for a defendant to respond with a written, reasoned, orderly argument regarding a plaintiff’s complaint.

I am not an attorney, so I am just guessing that one of the reasons for the time delay in the Judge addressing Negron’s motion to dismiss, might be that it has taken months for  Queen Tut aka Susan Lutzke to demonstrate that she was not going to plead her case in court. Although each defendant must answer for his/her words and actions individually, it must be noted that in this lawsuit triple damages were requested because the Plaintiff is treating them as a “unit” acting in concert with one another.  I am speculating that the Judge would want to have all 3 defendants submit their pleadings prior to her considering how this lawsuit should proceed.

Susan Lutzke is an extroverted person who is comfortable speaking in public, and she claims to be a researcher. The title of this article asks, Who shall plead for Queen Tut? Queen Tut was created by Lutzke and Jason Goodman to act as a kind of golem to avenge them of an adversary. The problem for Lutzke is that her fictional cover has been exposed, and she is legally accountable for the words spoken by her internet handle. She could have pleaded her case in court, presenting evidence and speaking the truth, as a pro se defendant.

However, the federal court system has procedures for evidence and sanctions for perjury.  Perhaps the creator of Queen Tut does not want a piercing light to shine on her words and actions.

UPDATE (listen with discernment, but interesting discussion):  Steve Outtrim interview of Queen Tut 11/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

The Amending of a Lawsuit to include Susan (Holmes) Lutzke, as Queen Tut

Queen Tut, who was named as one of three defendants in a defamation lawsuit filed by Robert David Steele, has presented the plaintiff with the very real problem of accurately identifying her legal name and location. It is now generally believed that Susan Lutzke aka Susan Holmes of Fort Collins, Colorado is the voice of the woman who Steele had attempted to obtain a default judgment against.  However, the fact that it was Carla A. Howell’s name on the lawsuit as Queen Tut, rather than Susan Lutzke’s, caused the Judge to rule against that motion.

On March 25, 2018, the Plaintiffs’ attorney Steven S. Biss filed a Motion For Leave to File Amended Complaint with the Federal Civil Court. This Motion addresses, first of all, the correction which was needed on the lawsuit title which is now proposed to be Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network v. Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron and Susan A. Lutzke a/k/a/ “Queen Tut”.

Secondly, this lawsuit is one in which the Plaintiffs are demanding a trial by jury, and the amount of “compensatory damages, statutory damages (three-fold the damages sustained), and punitive damages” has now been proposed to be increased from $15,350,000.00 to $18,350,000.00.

The complaint has been expanded to read “defamation per se, insulting words, business conspiracy, common-law conspiracy, tortious interference with contract and business expectancies, intentional affliction of emotional distress, personal trespass by computer and computer harassment, and unauthorized use of name and picture.” These last phrases, which I have emphasized, are the additions made to the original complaint. The proposed amended complaint has been expanded from 37 pages to about 99, to include supporting examples of words and actions taken by the defendants in the months following the filing of the original complaint on September 1, 2017.

The Introduction to the proposed Amended Complaint provides several new observations of interest noting the Defendants’ “egregious disrespect for the law is eclipsed only by their actual malice and desire to injure the Plaintiffs.”  The concluding sentence states, “This case presents a new age of defamation and a unique breed of lawless and malicious conduct.”  To read the proposed amendment, click on this link:  rds lawsuit 325 2018 motion to amend complaint

While it is well known that I do not favor Robert David Steele because his political and religious views greatly differ from my own, neither have I supported any of the defendant’s words and actions by which they have introduced questionable information into the public domain. My sympathies in this legal matter are strictly reserved for the Judge who must sort through the arguments and evidence presented by both sides, and determine if this case should proceed to a trial by jury.

My continuing interest in this legal dispute stems from my concern for several trends which I see in American society, including the lowering of the quality of public discourse on the various internet platforms, the constant stating of accusations against others without providing any supporting evidence, and the use of anonymous names which promote a sense of safety for those who spread lies. It should be of interest to the general public how the American judicial system views defamation claims, especially since most persons now, including juveniles, are routinely using social media platforms to express their opinions.

The pivotal event which caused me to first observe the plaintiff and the three defendants occurred on June 14, 2017 when the Port of Charleston, South Carolina was closed due to information that was given by George Webb on Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource The Truth show, involving a warning of a possible dirty bomb aboard the Maersk Memphis. Also around that time frame, several “conflicts” erupted concerning Defango, Dave (Sweigert) Acton, George (Sweigert) Webb, Jason Goodman and Trish Negron, along with a few others on other matters. And it was about this point in time that Queen Tut made her entrance onto the scene via The Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel.

Because of the Maersk Memphis dirty bomb incident arising from George Webb’s secret insider source, there were those who speculated that this whole situation was an Operation created for the purposes of restricting free speech on the internet. If this speculation has any merit, the question is, under whose authority was an Op set in motion? But the basic problem with this type of question is that the general public does not have the means to investigate, to discover hidden facts and relationships, to uncover money trails or any other type of information which is not open sourced. Thus the Robert David Steele lawsuit does present an interesting situation because it centers on internet defamation, and thus it falls into that general area of concern over what the boundaries of free speech really are.

I have read comments that assert that Robert David Steele is not a former CIA employee, as he claims.  Yet these persons never address the fact that there is a documented record on Steele, going back years on the internet,  that is entirely consistent with his published resume, including his public interactions with high ranking military officials, his government contracts, and his writings. Because of that public record, I find that Robert David Steele’s biography is credible.  I also have stated that he has provided much information on what he believes, and on his projects, so  that anyone can form a reasoned opinion about whether or not to financially support his endeavors.

And then there are the accusations and joking references that Jason Goodman and George Webb have connections to MOSSAD. All this creates an aura of CIA versus MOSSAD, or CIA impersonators versus MOSSAD impersonators. In all of this there is also the anti Zionist versus the pro Zionist thread running through this adversarial set-up. Thus there is little of the middle ground, which is the stance of the ordinary American citizen, represented in the panoramic view of the background of how this lawsuit came into existence in the first place.

What we do know is that on Jun 13, 2017, one day prior to the Port of Charleston, South Carolina incident, George Webb met with Robert David Steele at a restaurant and together they appeared on Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel,  where several thousand dollars was raised for Steele’s #UNRIG campaign. This joint effort was so successful that Robert David Steele was scheduled for an interview with Jason Goodman and Patricia Negron two days later. However, because of the involvement of George Webb and Jason Goodman in communicating the false information which led to the closing down of the Charleston port on June 14th, Robert David Steele cancelled that interview.

According to Steele, this withdrawing of his association from Crowdsource The Truth, was the beginning of the subsequent friction he had with Goodman and Negron.  His  lawsuit complaint asserts that Queen Tut, a woman believed to be known as Carla A. Howell, began acting together and in concert with Goodman and Negron on June 15, 2017.

However, the first documented video of Queen Tut’s involvement that is noted in Steele’s lawsuit  seems to be June 26, 2017. It is also noted that Jason Goodman officially withdrew his endorsement of Robert David Steele on July 1, 2017. Coincidentally, it was on July 1, 2017 that Susan (Holmes) Lutzke, who is now accused by Robert David Steele of being Queen Tut, lost her son Jeremy Holmes when he was shot by police in Fort Collins, Colorado. This confrontation with the police, came about after his mother had phoned 911 to report that her son, armed with a large knife, was attempting to make his way to his brother’s home to fulfil a death threat.

So almost from the start of the Queen Tut arrival on the stage of Crowdsource The Truth, this tragic undercurrent of sorrow and anger arising from the death of Susan Lutzke’s son is a factor in her conduct  which needs to be kept in remembrance, as we ponder these events in hindsight.

On March 17, 2018, Jason Goodman published on his Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel a 23 minute video called Libel, Lies and Lawsuits-Queen Tut Evidence Exposed. Although some of this video had sound problems, overall the information and commentary which Goodman presents is worth considering.

Jason Goodman is seen walking along a city street with people laughing in the background, and so I pick up his commentary at the 1.17 mark as he reflects on more recent events relating to the Robert David Steele lawsuit and Queen Tut’s actions.

Jason Goodman:  “…Robert David Steele, I call him a liar, because he lied and presented evidence that he’s lied, he’s spoken about his ridiculous lawsuit and he claims to have through discovery learned that I am paid by MOSSAD.  This is a lie.  Robert David Steele has not entered Discovery with his lawsuit, and I am not paid by MOSSAD and he has no evidence of that, therefore he’s lying and I’m calling him out on his lie and anyone who wants to defend that needs to present evidence to support his claim.”

Tracking Meroz comment:  In the screenshot below  is an excerpt of a November 21, 2017  ExoNews reposting of an article written by Robert David Steele dated November 7, 2017 called “How the Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics”. Notice that Steele speculates that legal discovery will reveal monthly payments to Goodman at around $3,000 month.  I do not know if there is another document that supports Goodman’s statement that RDS had claimed he already had begun the Discovery process in his lawsuit.

excerpt from Robert David Steele article, “How The Deep State Controls Social Media & Digitally Assassinates Critics”

Jason Goodman:  “This is a very simple process.  Evidence.  Jake Morphonios, would you think I am lying? You have no evidence to prove it, to show that I’m lying. Show that I’m wrong.  Let’s focus on this lawsuit, because there’s been a lot of activity coming from Queen Tut.  Susan Lutzke is what she told me her name was, but then she also sometimes goes by Susan Holmes on, enough there was this big development you know she spread first the lie that I had somehow wanted Trish to pay a lawyer or force Trish to pay a lawyer or plan to base my defense on Trish spending money on a lawyer.  This is not true.”

“I have answered Robert David Steele some stupid childish complaint Pro Se, meaning “defending myself”, your lawyer.  Now Trish could have done that.  I didn’t tell her to hire a lawyer.  I didn’t tell Trish my legal defense, we’re just not affiliated.  I have no responsibilities, no responsibility for her.  She’s an adult woman who can make her own decisions.  She could have answered the suit Pro Se, she could have ignored it like Susan has, and it was up to Trish to do whatever she wanted so this whole stupid narrative that Susan is trying to build that I’m somehow doing something to Trish or that Robert David Steele’s lawyer not doing anything after I answered Robert David Steele’s ridiculous complaint, you know she’s trying to make it look like something is going on.  So let’s look at what recently happened.”

“There’s this website called PACER which let’s you, it’s you know, public access to court electronic records.  You can read everything you want to read about the moronic lawsuit from Robert David Steele, including a letter recently sent by someone on behalf of Queen Tut….(shows the February 21, 2018 Mercia Francis letter including birth certificate in a previously taped session which was inserted into this March 17, 2018 commentary.)

Tracking Meroz commentary:  It would appear that Jason Goodman in his March 17th broadcast,  had not checked the PACER records in early March, and so like me, missed that the Judge had issued an Order regarding the Mercia Francis letters.  This Order can be viewed in the Tracking Meroz post dated March 22, 2018.

Jason Goodman: (7.20)…”Queen Tut told me the story that the police killed her son.  I think she said it was the Fort Collins police and she also told me that she went to a protest at Colorado State University, and you can see in the lower right hand corner here, I’ve placed an image that someone took at that protest which is Susan Lutzke holding a sign that says, “KILL ALL POLICE- THEY ARE KILLING US”….”.Jason Goodman provides a clip of the November 7, 2017 City of Fort Collins meeting (FCTV) and at the 8.21 mark citizen participation is allowed, and Susan (Lutzke) Holmes is given permission to speak. Tracking Meroz comment:  The date of this appearance is coincidentally the same date noted by ExoNews for the Robert David Steele article of November 7, 2017).

Susan Lutzke Holmes: (8.24 mark of Fort Collins video)  “My name is Susan Holmes.  I have a story, that supports the Native American Awareness Month.  My son, Jeremy Holmes was an enrolled member of the Native American Tribe.  He was 19 years old.  he was slaughtered, shot to death SIX TIMES by the CSU campus police officer and by Fort Collins police officer.  That is how Fort Collins treats Native American people.”

“My son, I’m here to clear my son’s name and I’m going to make a special request from this council to give the time to do it because he has been discredited and destroyed by the DA’s report.  The DA’s opinion.  The DA used words taken from me in a traumatic state when I found he was dead in a hospital to use in his DA’s opinion to justify the slaughter of my son.  So I’m asking that you give me the time to clear his name and to talk about his life and his death in Fort Collins because the community needs to know the truth about what is happening here.”

“I, when the DA’s opinion is the only narrative that is existing right now about what happened to my son and is completely filled with a number of false statements and I can prove that.  However, when I went to the Coloradoan to try to prove to have them to purchase half a page or a page to disabuse the false statements in the DA’s Opinion, they refused to let me buy that time to write that article so that I could inform the community about what’s REALLY happening in this community about what the police are doing to Native American teenagers who are in a mental health crisis.”

Photo of Jeremy Holmes at gunmemorial.org

“I have been living in HELL for four months since my son was shot to death.  His spine was shattered, his chest was pierced, his femoral artery was torn and the rest of the bullets just hit wherever.  He bled out on the street on Prospect.  He did not deserve to die that way.  He was an incredible human being.  He was brilliant, he graduated with honors from high school.  He was in the middle of designing a game, he was an IT kid, he was registered for college.  He was an incredible human being and he did not deserve to die like that.”.

Male voice of Fort Collins city council member: (11.30) “Ma’am, thank you.”

Susan (Lutzke) Holmes: “I’m NOT done!  I want the time to talk about my son’s life and his death…”. (The council decides to take a recess).

Here is a link to the July 18, 2017 Opinion of Clifford E. Riedel, District Attorney of the Eighth Judicial District of Colorado on the shooting death of Jeremy Holmes.  There are also several websites which show the police camera footage of their engagement with the knife wielding Jeremy Holmes, which resulted in his death.

Jason Goodman:  (12.23) “…in the DA’s report found that the police acted appropriately, but Queen Tut insists otherwise, and she also would instruct the college students at the University of Colorado to kill all police….”.

Jason Goodman: (13.03) “…the point is Susan Lutzke Holmes Tut has either submitted a fraudulent document to a United States Court, that letter written saying that she’s suffering from dementia and is 80 years old.  She’s either lying to the Court or she’s been lying to all of us the whole time and that woman standing there in Fort Collins, Colorado is not Susan Lutzke or Queen Tut.  I don’t know what to make of this, but I do know that Susan Lutzke Tut Queen Tut whatever this lady’s name is, Susan Holmes is a liar who has lied to you to try to convince you that I have committed crimes, that I am involved in pedophilia.   She has presented no evidence, OK, and here’s the thing.”

“This is a message I want to send to everyone.  If you don’t like it when I address these accusations, I understand.  But you don’t have to watch and it’s your right to not watch, but I need to keep doing this because you see this is the way these people operate.  They put out fake information. They put anonymous posts, places like 4chan.  Somebody shared with me a post from an anonymous person who says, oh a friend of mine connected with Jason on Tinder and she’s 15 and Jason said this and she said that and Jason was sexting a 15 year old.  This is untrue. (gives real life examples of posting fake documents).”

Jason Goodman: (15.39)…  “Each of these people are complicit in what is now an organized operation where they are working together to defame me, to slander me, and to harass me and they’re doing this not because I’m guilty of any of the horrendous things that they’ve accused me of.  It’s because I’m having guests on Crowdsource The Truth who are bringing forth evidence that do things like help in the firing of Andrew McCabe….”

Jason Goodman: (18.10)  “I really hope someone in law enforcement in Fort Collins, Colorado or in Virginia where that false document was submitted to the Court, is there a lawyer out there who can tell me what kind of crime is it to submit a false document to the Court because there was a time that I spoke to Susan Lutzke Holmes Tut on the phone almost every day!  And that woman’s not 80, I think she’s like 50 something or 60 and the woman that we saw in those videos looks like she’s about 60…”.

Tracking Meroz commentary: 

Jason Goodman has presented an interesting commentary with regard to some of the words of Queen Tut and Robert David Steele, which he claims are unfounded statements, not backed by evidence. Also he has provided some of the back story on Susan Lutzke which helps us to better understand how she has presented herself in the public arena.

It must be recalled that it was Jason Goodman who first introduced Susan Lutzke to his audience under a false name that he invented, as a cover to hide her true identity as his journalistic source.  Subsequent to that, he was aware of the circumstances surrounding her son’s death, and this fact had been alluded to on one of their videos. Perhaps she continued on with her research on Robert David Steele as a way to refocus her thoughts away from her personal tragedy.  

If you view the police camera footage which justifies the actions which the officers were forced to take, one has to agree with the conclusions made by the District Attorney who evaluated all the facts of this situation.  It is apparent from later public comments and actions of Susan (Holmes) Lutzke,  that she did not possess the grace to acknowledge the truth of the untenable situation in which her son had placed the officers in.  Instead, she chose to falsely accuse others for the type of death which Jeremy Holmes brought upon himself. 

I have a soft spot in my heart for Susan Lutzke’s loss of her 19 year old son.  But the hard truth about life and its burdens, is that it is never excusable to falsely accuse,  or to wrongly shift the burden of blame onto others, when the facts and evidence suggest otherwise.  Because this is a Christian commentary, I do not consider this story to be just a matter of “winning” a war of words in a lawsuit, but rather the importance of making right judgments in the interest of real justice.  Our own words go deep into the very heart of what we are in the sight of God.  One day all of us will have to give an account to God for our words and deeds, and that event ought to be soberly considered by every person, as we freely communicate on the internet.

 

 

Jason Goodman Writes The Attorney of Robert David Steele and has filed the Federal Court with a Motion For Sanctions

On September 30, 2017, Jason Goodman published a video on his Crowdsource The Truth channel called,  #fakelawsuit:  The Impotent Psychological Warfare of The Robber David Who Steals, (1.08.47 minutes in length). In this video Goodman has a discussion with Queen Tut, and he displays documents relating to the lawsuit involving him as a defendant, linked here:   Letter to Biss Rule 11.pdf. 

I am not going to comment on these documents other than to say that I am glad that Jason Goodman has organized his thoughts on this matter in writing and is confronting the plaintiff and his attorney in a formal, professional manner.

The first document is a formal letter to Steven S. Biss, the attorney for Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network, explaining why he believes he is warranted in filing a Rule 11 Sanctions motion with the court.  The second document represents the actual Motion For Sanctions which is being filed in this case. It is now up to the Plaintiff and his attorney, and the Judge residing over this civil case to respond.

Those of us who find this case interesting, look forward to knowing whether this lawsuit has merit and will proceed, or whether it will be judged to be a frivolous lawsuit.  Either way, it will be an education for those layman interested in the legal boundaries of public speech. As for me, I intend to read these two documents closely, and noting what questions are raised.  From there I will be doing further reading for understanding; especially online articles written by lawyers who are able to discuss the legal theories behind these issues.  May truth and order prevail.