Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman Document 110: Dave Sweigert’s Reply to Jason Goodman’s Opposition to Intervenor-Applicant Motion

On May 8, 2019, Document 110 was filed with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division, in the Robert David Steele, et. al. vs. Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit.

Document 110  (43 pages)  Reply in Opposition to Defendant’s Opposition By Intervenor-Applicant    rds doc 110 5 8 2019

Advertisements

D. George Sweigert, Intervenor-Applicant, Files Documents 101-103 in the Robert David Steele lawsuit, Requesting Injunctive Relief

On April 29, 2019, Documents 101, 102, 102-2, and 103 were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond, in the Robert David Steele et. al. vs. Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit.

Document 101 (2 pages)  Notice of Motion Requesting Leave of Court to File Motion for Injunctive Relief by Intervenor-Applicant  rds doc 101 429 2019

Document 102 (19 pages) Motion Requesting Leave of Court to File Motion for Injunctive Relief by Intervenor-Applicant  rds doc 102 429 2019

Document 102-2 (2 pages)  Proposed Order  rds doc 102 2 429 2019

Document 103 (48 pages + 29 pages exhibits Doc 103-1)  Memorandum of Law to Support Intervenor-Applicant’s Motion for Injunctive Relief  rds doc 103 429 2019

The Tidal Wave Hits the Beachhead: Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman – Documents 93 & 94 & 95

On April 11, 2019,  Documents 93 (plus exhibits),  94, and 95 were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division, in the Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman defamation lawsuit.

Document 93 (54 pages) Amended Motion to Intervene by Intervenor-Applicant Sweigert    rds doc 93 April 11 2019

Document 93-1 (1 page) Exhibits Certification  rds 93 1 exhibits certification April 11 2019

Document 93-2 (2 pages) Exhibit 1-A  rds 93 2 exhibit 1 A April 11 2019

Document 93-3 (3 pages)  Exhibit 1-B  rds 93 3 exhibit 1 B April 11 2019

Document 93-4 (2 pages) Exhibit 1-C  rds 93 4 exhibit 1 C April 11 2019

Document 93-5 (2 pages) Exhibit 1-D  rds 93 5 exhibit 1 D April 11 2019

Document 93-6 (5 pages0 Exhibit 1-E  rds 93 6 exhibit 2 April 11 2019

Document 93-7  (3 pages)  Exhibit 3  rds 93 7 exhibit 3 April 11 2019

Document 93-8  (8 pages) Exhibit 4  rds 93 8 exhibit 4 April 11 2019

Document 93-9  (6 pages)  Exhibit 5  rds 93 9 exhibit 5

Document 93-10 (3 pages)  Exhibit 6-A  rds 93 10 exhibit 6A April 11 2019

Document 93-11 (5 pages) Exhibit 6-B  rds doc 93 11 exhibit 6B April 11 2019

Document 93-12 (8 pages)  Exhibit 6-C  rds 93 12 exhibit 6C April 11, 2019

Document 93-13 (5 pages) Exhibit 6-D  rds doc 93 13 exhibit 6D April 11 2019

Document 93-14  (11 pages)  Exhibit 7  rds 93 14 exhibit 7 april 11 2019

Document 93-15  (9 pages)  Exhibit 8  rds doc 93 15 exhibit 8

Document 94 (27 pages) Memorandum of Law to Support Intervenor Applicant’s Amended Motion to Intervene  rds doc 94 April 11 2019

Document 95 (23 pages)  Patricia A. Negron’s Answer & Affirmative Defenses to the Amended Complaint  rds doc 95 April 11 2019 Patricia Negron Answer

APRIL FOOL! Dave Sweigert Confounds Us All by filing his Amended Intervenor Motion Ahead of Schedule

On Sunday, March 31, 2019, the Honorable M. Hannah Lauck, United States District Judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division, filed Documents 85 and 86, giving an Opinion and an  Order in the Robert David Steele, et al. vs. Jason Goodman, et al. defamation lawsuit.

One of those items covered by the Order regarded David Sweigert’s Motion to Intervene, where a deadline was set for amending this motion by April 12, 2019.  Response by the defendants to this amendment was given as  April 23, 2019.

Interestingly, today on April Fool’s Day, Documents 87, 88 and 89 were revealed on Pacer showing a filing date of March 29, 2019, two days earlier than the Judge’s Order, but assigned document numbers sequentially after the March 31, 2019, Judge’s Order and Opinion of documents 85 and 86.

Document 87 (2 pages) Notice of Amended Motion, Amended Motion to Intervene, Memorandum of Law and Argument

rds doc 87 march 29 2019

Document 88  (26 pages)  Amended Motion to Intervene by Intervenor-Applicant Sweigert

rds doc 88 amended motion intervene march 29 2019

Document 88-1 (1 page) Exhibits

rds doc 88 1 exhibits march 29 2019

Document 88-2 (6 pages)  Exhibit 1

rds doc 88 2 exhibit 1 march 29 2019

Document 88-3  (11 pages) Exhibit 2

rds doc 88 3 exhibit 2 march 29 2019

Document 88-4  (3 pages)  Exhibit 3

rds doc 88 4 exhibit 3 March 29, 2019

Document 88-5  (5 pages)  Exhibit 4

rds doc 88 5 exhibit 4 march 29 2019

Document 88-6 (9 pages ) Exhibit 5

rds doc 88 6 exhibit 5 march 29 2019

Document 89  (13 pages)  Memorandum of Law to Support Intervenor Applicant’s Amended Motion to Intervene

rds doc 89 memo of law intervenor march 29 2019

D. George Sweigert Gives Notice of Intent to File Amended Motion to Intervene

On March 18, 2019, Document 81 was filed in the Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman lawsuit representing a letter written by  D. George Sweigert to Jason Goodman and the Clerk of the Court, Richmond, Virginia.  This 5 page letter is a Notice of Intent to file Amended Motion to Intervene and can be read at this link:  rds doc 81

Of interest in this letter are the 14 points stated which afford Goodman to take the opportunity to correct deficiencies in Document 78.

Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman: Document 78 Defendant’s Opposition to the Motion to Intervene

On March 8, 2019, Document 78 and exhibits were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division in Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman.

Document 78 (17 pages) Defendant’s Opposition to the Motion to Intervene

rds doc 78

Document 78-1 (19 pages) Exhibit A:  Transcript of Multi-Party video chat between D. George Sweigert, Tyroan Simpson, Manuel Chavez III, Nathan Stolpman, Cheri and Hoaxwars published on You Tube  rds 78 exhibit 1

Document 78-2 (55 pages)  Exhibit B: transcript  rds 78 exhibit 2

Document 78-3 (3 pages)  Exhibit C: Threatening Voicemail from Tyroan Simpson  rds 78 exhibit 3

Document 78-4 (2 pages)  Exhibit D: Sweigert contacted Barden’s attorney with intent to harass  rds 78 exhibit 4

Document 78-5 (2 pages) Exhibit E: State Bar of Arizona letter to Jason Goodman    rds 78 exhibit 5

Document 78-6  (2 pages)  Exhibit F: letter dated 2/22/2019 from Sweigert to Captain Tama USCG  rds 78 exhibit 6

Document 78-7 (1 page)  Exhibit G: envelopes  rds 78 exhibit 7

Document 78-8 (1 page) Exhibit H:   envelope  rds 78 exhibit 8

Document 78-9 (103 pages)  Exhibit I: Manuel Chavez and George Sweigert live stream YouTube 11/25/17  rds 78 exhibit 9

Document 78-10 (1 page)  Exhibit J: images  rds 78 exhibit 10

Document 78-11 (1 page) Exhibit K: Brain Trust message  rds 78 exhibit 11

Document 78-12  (1 page)  Exhibit L: Chavez Instructions for Money Laundering Via Steemit  rds 78 exhibit 12

Document 78-13  (2 pages) Exhibit M:  letter dated 12/21/18 Notice of Intent to Sue, addressed to Jason Goodman and George Webb Sweigert  rds 78 exhibit 13

Document 78-14 (10 pages)  Exhibit N:  990EZ 2017 Earth Intelligence Network        rds 78 exhibit 14

Document 78-15 (7 pages) Exhibit O: Personal Meeting, Text and Email Communications between Plaintiff Steele, Intervenor Applicant’s Brother Webb One Day Prior to Alleged “Dirty Bomb Hoax” rds 78 exhibit 15

FYI: Robert David Steele lawsuit update on Patricia Negron

November 8, 2017 Defendant Patricia A. Negron’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss The Complaint    (click on pdf link below)

earth intelligence networks negron motion to dismiss

Also of interest is that a certificate of service shows that Queen Tut’s legal name is Susan A. Lutzke of Fort Collins, Colorado