Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman Documents 123 & 124: Return of Lutzke Mail & Sweigert’s Supplement to Motion regarding Injunctive Relief

On June 6, 2019, Documents 123 and 124 were filed with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division in the Robert David Steele, et. al. vs. Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit.

Document 123 (2 pages) Return of Mail to Court from Susan Lutzke address on record

rds doc 123 june 6 2019 return of lutzke mail

Document 124 plus 9 exhibits  (30 pages)  Intervenor-Applicant’s FRCP Rule 15(d) Supplement to Motion for Leave to Seek Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 101)

rds doc 124 june 6 2019

Advertisements

Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman Document 120: Dave Sweigert Letter to Jason Goodman

On June 4, 2019, Document 120 was filed with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division in the Robert David Steele, et. al. vs. Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit.

Document 120 (6 pages)  Letter to Jason Goodman from D. George Sweigert concerning Queen Tut and Quinn Michaels  rds doc 120 june 4, 2019

Robert David Steele vs Jason Goodman Document 119: Sweigert on Gangstalking

On May 30, 3019, Document 119 was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division in the Robert David Steele, et. al. vs. Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit.

Document 119 (31 pages) Intervenor-Applicants FRCP Rule 15 (d) Supplement to Motion for Leave to Seek Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 101)    rds doc 119 may 30 2019

D. George Sweigert vs. Jason Goodman Amended RICO Complaint

On June 14, 2018, which was the one year anniversary of the Port of Charleston dirty bomb incident, D. George Sweigert filed a 24 page RICO lawsuit against Jason Goodman, as Defendant.

On June 29, 2018, the original complaint was amended, increasing it to 44 pages.  The Amended Complaint can be seen at this link:   sweigert amended rico 1

The following notes are suggested areas of interest to the reader.

The primary reasons why we should be interested in this RICO case are stated in the Introduction-Summary.

Under “Introduction”, a Summary has been added in this amended complaint, which  focuses on the actions of the U. S. Coast Guard’s  washing of “its hands of any meaningful investigation of a radiological bomb threat delivered to the Charleston Sector duty officer.” Consequently, the FBI was relied upon to investigate the source of the bomb threat, yet we find that this entire matter was “resolved” within 24 hours. One contributing factor noted was that the Midwestern conspiracy theorist allegedly hid behind his journalist privilege of not disclosing his source.

Dave Sweigert observes that one F.B.I. agent investigating this event was apparently from the West Virginia area of operations–exactly the location of the contract F.B.I. informant which had been the hidden source of George Webb Sweigert. He notes, “An overwhelming preponderance of evidence indicates that the F. B. I. took no action to mitigate the phenomenal conflict of interest in investigating this matter–as it involved one of their contract informants.  The practical effects of the F. B. I.’s apparent white-wash has been to allow the wrong-doers to continue their operations with a bold sense of immunity from government prosecution; engaging in a series of illegal racketeering activities.”

In the Background section of the Introduction, more than 4 pages are devoted to laying out the racketeering pattern, the Port of Charleston incident, and the U. S. C G. authority for investigating the events which transpired on June 14, 2018.

Jurisdiction

This RICO lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, thus nine reasons are stated to establish both who was impacted by the Port of Charleston dirty bomb threat hoax as well as what laws and regulations apply as a measuring stick of the actions of that eventful day. The plaintiff invokes the Private Attorney General (PAG) doctrine which allows him to “augment limited resources of the U. S. C. G.” and their “prosecutorial gaps”. This allows “a private citizen’s standing to sue for vindication of a public objective”.

Parties

The general description states, “This complaint alleges that the defendant, and his cooperative of wrongdoers, operate in alignment on social media for a common purpose.  By staging fake news, raising public alarm, spreading junk science, using deception to implement the Port hoax, etc. are rewarded with the expectation of remuneration, increases in their financial status and receipt of other such pecuniary advantages and benefits”.

There are 7 Parties described in detail:

The Plaintiff-Certified in Critical Infrastructure Protection

Wrong-doer Multimedia System Design, Inc.

Crowdsource the Truth- Racketeering Enterprise

Defendant Jason Goodman – Coordinator of CSTT RICO Cartel

Wrong-doer George Webb Sweigert – “Investigative Journalist”

Wrong-doer Deep Uranium – “Confidential Source” of Hoax

Wrong-Doer Quinn Michaels -Team Tyler Hacker Network

General Allegations:

The last sentences conclude, “Unfortunately for law enforcement (and for the public), the complex maze of wrong-doers involved would have been perplexing to unravel.  It is highly unlikely that any significant legal consequences would have been visited upon the defendants and wrong-doers without this present lawsuit.”  Also, the plaintiff Sweigert emphasizes that “this is not a private dispute and there are no other equitable remedies available under law, except those remedies articulated herein.”

Specific Allegations:  Ten Counts (in the original complaint 5 were listed)

Count One:  MDSI Operates as a Racketeering Enterprise

Count Two: MDSI/CSTT Closure of the Wando Welch Terminal at the Port of Charleston

Count Three: Fraudulent “Hudson Intelligence Group”

Count Four:  Conspiracy to Defraud The United States

Count Five:  Murder For Hire Activities on the Darknet

Count Six:  Hoax Assassination Plots

Count Seven:  Malicious State Actors Deny Civil Rights

Count Eight:  Trafficking in Personally Identifiable Information

Count Nine:  Tampering With A Witness

Count Ten:  Abuse of Court Processes by a Federally Protected Witness

Tracking the Leopard Meroz hopes that this amended complaint will be read with interest and with care.  The overall importance of the issues addressed by this lawsuit, as well as the finer details, are highly interesting and of great import in connection to our contemporary Alternative News Media style of journalism.

 

 

FLAG DAY

June 14th is Flag Day in the United States of America, and commemorates the June 14, 1777 resolution of the Second Continental Congress’s adoption of our nation’s flag.Last year on June 14, 2017 Crowdsource The Truth memorialized Flag Day by shutting down the Port of Charleston with the false report of a dirty bomb.  This year on Flag Day,  Jason Goodman’s CSTT operation was honored by the filing of a RICO lawsuit against them by plaintiff  D. George Sweigert in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. This complaint can also be read as Document 60 in the Robert David Steele defamation lawsuit.

Those documents are linked here:  sweigert south carolina rico 1 and sweigert south carolina rico 2

So what was Jason Goodman doing on this year’s Flag Day? He was interviewing, along with Quinn Michaels, a man named Ted Visner about Corruption Within Child Protective Services.

Does anybody know who Ted Visner is?  Looking over the comments under this video, one CSTT Vetting Agent knew, but did not elaborate further.  The rest of the Vetters were asleep on their watch; some even thought it was a great interview.  At the beginning of this video, Jason Goodman offers his disclaimer, as duly noted in the following screenshot.

Disclaimer of Jason Goodman with regard to Ted Visner: “You and I have only just become acquainted today”. I suppose that lays the foundation for not asking reasonable questions of his guest.

In keeping with the Flag Day theme, we should first note that on Visner’s website, visner4sheriff.wordpress.com, he had posted the following patriotic notice 3 years ago, on August 10, 2015.So in addition to Visner’s readiness to take over in the event of  the imminent collapse of the current structure of government, his past desire to run for Sheriff, and his recent legal problems involving marijuana,  we must ask why Jason Goodman’s first question to him is, “Ted, you’ve got a harrowing tale to tell us about the Child Protective Services, is that correct?” This particular topic has been brought up to help us to sympathize with Quinn Michaels’ own woeful tales of his CPS encounters.  And there Quinn is seen sitting in the same room as Jason Goodman as they are now constant companions, and will continue to be so far into the future,  as they are both highlighted in Dave Sweigert’s RICO lawsuit.

Visner’s sad story is about his girlfriend’s three children that had been removed by the state of Michigan “because she had a dirty house and there were dirty dishes”.  This is not really HIS story, unless he was the one who left the house messy when CPS happened to show up. Visner considers himself a noble and worthy advocate for persons who have been unjustly treated by Child Protective Services.  He knows all about children in untenable situations, for around that time he owed $30,000 in back child support for his own children in Washington State.

Ted Visner complains about the following Officer Safety Caution which features him.Here is a video which Ted Visner put out on his YouTube channel on July 11, 2015 which got him almost 427,000 views.  He has titled it, First Shots of the Revolution About To Be Fired in Isabella County Michigan. The description under this video says,  After being denied due process (defenses to eviction) I am making a stand and fulfilling my oath to defend this country against all enemies, foreign and domestic as an American Patriot.  Apparently, Ted Visner is a real flag waver.At the 1.08 mark, Ted Visner says, “This is the start, folks.  I would imagine that they’d show up with a SWAT team, a bunch of armed men and it’ll go down like the Bundy Ranch, only with no opposition.  And I will be executed by the same Sheriff’s Department that stole a different house in 2010.  These guys have taken plausible deniability to an entirely new level.”

So what is the story behind the house evictions? An article by the morningsun.com dated September 17, 2015, says, “Visner, 48, was arrested early Thursday morning at Maxfield’s restaurant in Edmore on a warrant charging him with squatting and trespassing at a home at 7287 W. Fremont Road in Rolland Township.  That home was formerly owned by Kathy Smith, whom Visner refers to as his wife, but is listed in court documents as his longtime girlfriend. Smith had not been living in the home but Visner remained after Judge Eric Janes signed an eviction order in Junge giving possession to the legal owner, Bank of America. Bank of America purchased the unfinished home at auction because Smith defaulted on mortgage payments.”

“Police using bomb squads and tracking dogs searched the home and surrounding property as a precaution because Visner vowed armed resistance to being removed, and Sheriff Leo Mioduszewski said he didn’t want to take any chances. Mioduszewski said police arrested Visner in the parking lot of Maxfield’s restaurant in Edmore, where he was apparently going to attend a meeting of his self-formed People’s Unified Militia of Michigan…Mioduszewski said process servers typically handle evictions but police chose to evict Visner because of his previous threats.”

MFI-Miami.com wrote an article in January of 2016, called Wannabe Domestic Terrorist, Convicted Squatter and Deadbeat Dad Ted Visner Goes Full Blown Sovereign Citizen Crazy on Federal Bankruptcy Judge.  This article describes some of Visner’s background, but what I found interesting was his attempt to play lawyer based on the sovereign citizen movement point of view. One of the sentences in his legal papers which is interesting says, “This court is being ORDERED to show cause as to why it unlawfully converted the Debtors Objection Hearing on October 6, 2010 to a Creditor’s Motion Hearing and calling the prophylactic filed on September 20, 2010 by Shelly Sweet and Bruce Havens titled “Notice of Intent to Self/Take Possession” a Motion when it was clearly NOT A MOTION.”  MFI-Miami comments, “Prophylactic?  It appears the only disease Sweet and Havens was trying to prevent was Visner’s apparent mental illness.”

It must be remembered that Visner never had any legal standing with regard to the foreclosure.  His name was not on the documents; which meant that he was a squatter on the property. In other words, he lied about having his rights denied. Given the threats he had openly made, why would anyone think he is fit to be around children?

Here is how other militias came to regard his “plight”. All of this information was online from a couple of years back, and could have been easily discovered by the Crowdsource the Truth community.

It seems that vile men are being exalted as just men in the Alternative News Media these days. And because they are being hailed as heroes fighting against corruption, that means that the reputations of law enforcement, Child Protective Service employees, and Judges are being routinely slandered in order to distort the facts and evidence of what really took place.  Will Jason Goodman set the record straight? Is he asking Ted Visner’s “legal” advice on how one files a prophylactic in a RICO lawsuit? Will Flag Day ever return to normal again?