FYI: Robert David Steele Lawsuit Updates

The three documents recently submitted to the court:

4/11/2018 Document 38 Order that the Court grants 36 Motion to Amend.  To the extent necessary the Court Denies as Moot Negron’s 21 Motion to dismiss.

linked here:   rds 411 2018 doc 38

4/13/2018 Document 39 Amended Complaint against all defendants, filed by RDS
linked here:  rds 413 2018 doc 39

4/17/2018 Document 40 Proposed Summons re 39 Amended Complaint (Request for Issuance of Summons to Susan A. Lutzke) by Robert David Steele

linked here:  rds 417 2018 doc 40

 

 

Advertisements

The Amending of a Lawsuit to include Susan (Holmes) Lutzke, as Queen Tut

Queen Tut, who was named as one of three defendants in a defamation lawsuit filed by Robert David Steele, has presented the plaintiff with the very real problem of accurately identifying her legal name and location. It is now generally believed that Susan Lutzke aka Susan Holmes of Fort Collins, Colorado is the voice of the woman who Steele had attempted to obtain a default judgment against.  However, the fact that it was Carla A. Howell’s name on the lawsuit as Queen Tut, rather than Susan Lutzke’s, caused the Judge to rule against that motion.

On March 25, 2018, the Plaintiffs’ attorney Steven S. Biss filed a Motion For Leave to File Amended Complaint with the Federal Civil Court. This Motion addresses, first of all, the correction which was needed on the lawsuit title which is now proposed to be Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network v. Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron and Susan A. Lutzke a/k/a/ “Queen Tut”.

Secondly, this lawsuit is one in which the Plaintiffs are demanding a trial by jury, and the amount of “compensatory damages, statutory damages (three-fold the damages sustained), and punitive damages” has now been proposed to be increased from $15,350,000.00 to $18,350,000.00.

The complaint has been expanded to read “defamation per se, insulting words, business conspiracy, common-law conspiracy, tortious interference with contract and business expectancies, intentional affliction of emotional distress, personal trespass by computer and computer harassment, and unauthorized use of name and picture.” These last phrases, which I have emphasized, are the additions made to the original complaint. The proposed amended complaint has been expanded from 37 pages to about 99, to include supporting examples of words and actions taken by the defendants in the months following the filing of the original complaint on September 1, 2017.

The Introduction to the proposed Amended Complaint provides several new observations of interest noting the Defendants’ “egregious disrespect for the law is eclipsed only by their actual malice and desire to injure the Plaintiffs.”  The concluding sentence states, “This case presents a new age of defamation and a unique breed of lawless and malicious conduct.”  To read the proposed amendment, click on this link:  rds lawsuit 325 2018 motion to amend complaint

While it is well known that I do not favor Robert David Steele because his political and religious views greatly differ from my own, neither have I supported any of the defendant’s words and actions by which they have introduced questionable information into the public domain. My sympathies in this legal matter are strictly reserved for the Judge who must sort through the arguments and evidence presented by both sides, and determine if this case should proceed to a trial by jury.

My continuing interest in this legal dispute stems from my concern for several trends which I see in American society, including the lowering of the quality of public discourse on the various internet platforms, the constant stating of accusations against others without providing any supporting evidence, and the use of anonymous names which promote a sense of safety for those who spread lies. It should be of interest to the general public how the American judicial system views defamation claims, especially since most persons now, including juveniles, are routinely using social media platforms to express their opinions.

The pivotal event which caused me to first observe the plaintiff and the three defendants occurred on June 14, 2017 when the Port of Charleston, South Carolina was closed due to information that was given by George Webb on Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource The Truth show, involving a warning of a possible dirty bomb aboard the Maersk Memphis. Also around that time frame, several “conflicts” erupted concerning Defango, Dave (Sweigert) Acton, George (Sweigert) Webb, Jason Goodman and Trish Negron, along with a few others on other matters. And it was about this point in time that Queen Tut made her entrance onto the scene via The Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel.

Because of the Maersk Memphis dirty bomb incident arising from George Webb’s secret insider source, there were those who speculated that this whole situation was an Operation created for the purposes of restricting free speech on the internet. If this speculation has any merit, the question is, under whose authority was an Op set in motion? But the basic problem with this type of question is that the general public does not have the means to investigate, to discover hidden facts and relationships, to uncover money trails or any other type of information which is not open sourced. Thus the Robert David Steele lawsuit does present an interesting situation because it centers on internet defamation, and thus it falls into that general area of concern over what the boundaries of free speech really are.

I have read comments that assert that Robert David Steele is not a former CIA employee, as he claims.  Yet these persons never address the fact that there is a documented record on Steele, going back years on the internet,  that is entirely consistent with his published resume, including his public interactions with high ranking military officials, his government contracts, and his writings. Because of that public record, I find that Robert David Steele’s biography is credible.  I also have stated that he has provided much information on what he believes, and on his projects, so  that anyone can form a reasoned opinion about whether or not to financially support his endeavors.

And then there are the accusations and joking references that Jason Goodman and George Webb have connections to MOSSAD. All this creates an aura of CIA versus MOSSAD, or CIA impersonators versus MOSSAD impersonators. In all of this there is also the anti Zionist versus the pro Zionist thread running through this adversarial set-up. Thus there is little of the middle ground, which is the stance of the ordinary American citizen, represented in the panoramic view of the background of how this lawsuit came into existence in the first place.

What we do know is that on Jun 13, 2017, one day prior to the Port of Charleston, South Carolina incident, George Webb met with Robert David Steele at a restaurant and together they appeared on Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel,  where several thousand dollars was raised for Steele’s #UNRIG campaign. This joint effort was so successful that Robert David Steele was scheduled for an interview with Jason Goodman and Patricia Negron two days later. However, because of the involvement of George Webb and Jason Goodman in communicating the false information which led to the closing down of the Charleston port on June 14th, Robert David Steele cancelled that interview.

According to Steele, this withdrawing of his association from Crowdsource The Truth, was the beginning of the subsequent friction he had with Goodman and Negron.  His  lawsuit complaint asserts that Queen Tut, a woman believed to be known as Carla A. Howell, began acting together and in concert with Goodman and Negron on June 15, 2017.

However, the first documented video of Queen Tut’s involvement that is noted in Steele’s lawsuit  seems to be June 26, 2017. It is also noted that Jason Goodman officially withdrew his endorsement of Robert David Steele on July 1, 2017. Coincidentally, it was on July 1, 2017 that Susan (Holmes) Lutzke, who is now accused by Robert David Steele of being Queen Tut, lost her son Jeremy Holmes when he was shot by police in Fort Collins, Colorado. This confrontation with the police, came about after his mother had phoned 911 to report that her son, armed with a large knife, was attempting to make his way to his brother’s home to fulfil a death threat.

So almost from the start of the Queen Tut arrival on the stage of Crowdsource The Truth, this tragic undercurrent of sorrow and anger arising from the death of Susan Lutzke’s son is a factor in her conduct  which needs to be kept in remembrance, as we ponder these events in hindsight.

On March 17, 2018, Jason Goodman published on his Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel a 23 minute video called Libel, Lies and Lawsuits-Queen Tut Evidence Exposed. Although some of this video had sound problems, overall the information and commentary which Goodman presents is worth considering.

Jason Goodman is seen walking along a city street with people laughing in the background, and so I pick up his commentary at the 1.17 mark as he reflects on more recent events relating to the Robert David Steele lawsuit and Queen Tut’s actions.

Jason Goodman:  “…Robert David Steele, I call him a liar, because he lied and presented evidence that he’s lied, he’s spoken about his ridiculous lawsuit and he claims to have through discovery learned that I am paid by MOSSAD.  This is a lie.  Robert David Steele has not entered Discovery with his lawsuit, and I am not paid by MOSSAD and he has no evidence of that, therefore he’s lying and I’m calling him out on his lie and anyone who wants to defend that needs to present evidence to support his claim.”

Tracking Meroz comment:  In the screenshot below  is an excerpt of a November 21, 2017  ExoNews reposting of an article written by Robert David Steele dated November 7, 2017 called “How the Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics”. Notice that Steele speculates that legal discovery will reveal monthly payments to Goodman at around $3,000 month.  I do not know if there is another document that supports Goodman’s statement that RDS had claimed he already had begun the Discovery process in his lawsuit.

excerpt from Robert David Steele article, “How The Deep State Controls Social Media & Digitally Assassinates Critics”

Jason Goodman:  “This is a very simple process.  Evidence.  Jake Morphonios, would you think I am lying? You have no evidence to prove it, to show that I’m lying. Show that I’m wrong.  Let’s focus on this lawsuit, because there’s been a lot of activity coming from Queen Tut.  Susan Lutzke is what she told me her name was, but then she also sometimes goes by Susan Holmes on, enough there was this big development you know she spread first the lie that I had somehow wanted Trish to pay a lawyer or force Trish to pay a lawyer or plan to base my defense on Trish spending money on a lawyer.  This is not true.”

“I have answered Robert David Steele some stupid childish complaint Pro Se, meaning “defending myself”, your lawyer.  Now Trish could have done that.  I didn’t tell her to hire a lawyer.  I didn’t tell Trish my legal defense, we’re just not affiliated.  I have no responsibilities, no responsibility for her.  She’s an adult woman who can make her own decisions.  She could have answered the suit Pro Se, she could have ignored it like Susan has, and it was up to Trish to do whatever she wanted so this whole stupid narrative that Susan is trying to build that I’m somehow doing something to Trish or that Robert David Steele’s lawyer not doing anything after I answered Robert David Steele’s ridiculous complaint, you know she’s trying to make it look like something is going on.  So let’s look at what recently happened.”

“There’s this website called PACER which let’s you, it’s you know, public access to court electronic records.  You can read everything you want to read about the moronic lawsuit from Robert David Steele, including a letter recently sent by someone on behalf of Queen Tut….(shows the February 21, 2018 Mercia Francis letter including birth certificate in a previously taped session which was inserted into this March 17, 2018 commentary.)

Tracking Meroz commentary:  It would appear that Jason Goodman in his March 17th broadcast,  had not checked the PACER records in early March, and so like me, missed that the Judge had issued an Order regarding the Mercia Francis letters.  This Order can be viewed in the Tracking Meroz post dated March 22, 2018.

Jason Goodman: (7.20)…”Queen Tut told me the story that the police killed her son.  I think she said it was the Fort Collins police and she also told me that she went to a protest at Colorado State University, and you can see in the lower right hand corner here, I’ve placed an image that someone took at that protest which is Susan Lutzke holding a sign that says, “KILL ALL POLICE- THEY ARE KILLING US”….”.Jason Goodman provides a clip of the November 7, 2017 City of Fort Collins meeting (FCTV) and at the 8.21 mark citizen participation is allowed, and Susan (Lutzke) Holmes is given permission to speak. Tracking Meroz comment:  The date of this appearance is coincidentally the same date noted by ExoNews for the Robert David Steele article of November 7, 2017).

Susan Lutzke Holmes: (8.24 mark of Fort Collins video)  “My name is Susan Holmes.  I have a story, that supports the Native American Awareness Month.  My son, Jeremy Holmes was an enrolled member of the Native American Tribe.  He was 19 years old.  he was slaughtered, shot to death SIX TIMES by the CSU campus police officer and by Fort Collins police officer.  That is how Fort Collins treats Native American people.”

“My son, I’m here to clear my son’s name and I’m going to make a special request from this council to give the time to do it because he has been discredited and destroyed by the DA’s report.  The DA’s opinion.  The DA used words taken from me in a traumatic state when I found he was dead in a hospital to use in his DA’s opinion to justify the slaughter of my son.  So I’m asking that you give me the time to clear his name and to talk about his life and his death in Fort Collins because the community needs to know the truth about what is happening here.”

“I, when the DA’s opinion is the only narrative that is existing right now about what happened to my son and is completely filled with a number of false statements and I can prove that.  However, when I went to the Coloradoan to try to prove to have them to purchase half a page or a page to disabuse the false statements in the DA’s Opinion, they refused to let me buy that time to write that article so that I could inform the community about what’s REALLY happening in this community about what the police are doing to Native American teenagers who are in a mental health crisis.”

Photo of Jeremy Holmes at gunmemorial.org

“I have been living in HELL for four months since my son was shot to death.  His spine was shattered, his chest was pierced, his femoral artery was torn and the rest of the bullets just hit wherever.  He bled out on the street on Prospect.  He did not deserve to die that way.  He was an incredible human being.  He was brilliant, he graduated with honors from high school.  He was in the middle of designing a game, he was an IT kid, he was registered for college.  He was an incredible human being and he did not deserve to die like that.”.

Male voice of Fort Collins city council member: (11.30) “Ma’am, thank you.”

Susan (Lutzke) Holmes: “I’m NOT done!  I want the time to talk about my son’s life and his death…”. (The council decides to take a recess).

Here is a link to the July 18, 2017 Opinion of Clifford E. Riedel, District Attorney of the Eighth Judicial District of Colorado on the shooting death of Jeremy Holmes.  There are also several websites which show the police camera footage of their engagement with the knife wielding Jeremy Holmes, which resulted in his death.

Jason Goodman:  (12.23) “…in the DA’s report found that the police acted appropriately, but Queen Tut insists otherwise, and she also would instruct the college students at the University of Colorado to kill all police….”.

Jason Goodman: (13.03) “…the point is Susan Lutzke Holmes Tut has either submitted a fraudulent document to a United States Court, that letter written saying that she’s suffering from dementia and is 80 years old.  She’s either lying to the Court or she’s been lying to all of us the whole time and that woman standing there in Fort Collins, Colorado is not Susan Lutzke or Queen Tut.  I don’t know what to make of this, but I do know that Susan Lutzke Tut Queen Tut whatever this lady’s name is, Susan Holmes is a liar who has lied to you to try to convince you that I have committed crimes, that I am involved in pedophilia.   She has presented no evidence, OK, and here’s the thing.”

“This is a message I want to send to everyone.  If you don’t like it when I address these accusations, I understand.  But you don’t have to watch and it’s your right to not watch, but I need to keep doing this because you see this is the way these people operate.  They put out fake information. They put anonymous posts, places like 4chan.  Somebody shared with me a post from an anonymous person who says, oh a friend of mine connected with Jason on Tinder and she’s 15 and Jason said this and she said that and Jason was sexting a 15 year old.  This is untrue. (gives real life examples of posting fake documents).”

Jason Goodman: (15.39)…  “Each of these people are complicit in what is now an organized operation where they are working together to defame me, to slander me, and to harass me and they’re doing this not because I’m guilty of any of the horrendous things that they’ve accused me of.  It’s because I’m having guests on Crowdsource The Truth who are bringing forth evidence that do things like help in the firing of Andrew McCabe….”

Jason Goodman: (18.10)  “I really hope someone in law enforcement in Fort Collins, Colorado or in Virginia where that false document was submitted to the Court, is there a lawyer out there who can tell me what kind of crime is it to submit a false document to the Court because there was a time that I spoke to Susan Lutzke Holmes Tut on the phone almost every day!  And that woman’s not 80, I think she’s like 50 something or 60 and the woman that we saw in those videos looks like she’s about 60…”.

Tracking Meroz commentary: 

Jason Goodman has presented an interesting commentary with regard to some of the words of Queen Tut and Robert David Steele, which he claims are unfounded statements, not backed by evidence. Also he has provided some of the back story on Susan Lutzke which helps us to better understand how she has presented herself in the public arena.

It must be recalled that it was Jason Goodman who first introduced Susan Lutzke to his audience under a false name that he invented, as a cover to hide her true identity as his journalistic source.  Subsequent to that, he was aware of the circumstances surrounding her son’s death, and this fact had been alluded to on one of their videos. Perhaps she continued on with her research on Robert David Steele as a way to refocus her thoughts away from her personal tragedy.  

If you view the police camera footage which justifies the actions which the officers were forced to take, one has to agree with the conclusions made by the District Attorney who evaluated all the facts of this situation.  It is apparent from later public comments and actions of Susan (Holmes) Lutzke,  that she did not possess the grace to acknowledge the truth of the untenable situation in which her son had placed the officers in.  Instead, she chose to falsely accuse others for the type of death which Jeremy Holmes brought upon himself. 

I have a soft spot in my heart for Susan Lutzke’s loss of her 19 year old son.  But the hard truth about life and its burdens, is that it is never excusable to falsely accuse,  or to wrongly shift the burden of blame onto others, when the facts and evidence suggest otherwise.  Because this is a Christian commentary, I do not consider this story to be just a matter of “winning” a war of words in a lawsuit, but rather the importance of making right judgments in the interest of real justice.  Our own words go deep into the very heart of what we are in the sight of God.  One day all of us will have to give an account to God for our words and deeds, and that event ought to be soberly considered by every person, as we freely communicate on the internet.

 

 

Queen Tut’s Daughter Mercia Francis Submits Another Letter to the Court in Robert David Steele Defamation Case

A letter from Mercia Francis dated February 25, 2018 and received by the Clerk of U. S. District Court in Richmond, VA on February 28, 2018 was filed on the court record on March 1, 2018. This 14 page document (#33) consists of a 2 page letter from Mercia Francis, a letter from FOCO Properties concerning the tenancy of Susan Lutzke in a Fort Collins, CO condominium, and the November 7, 2017 Robert David Steele article called, How The Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics.

This Robert David Steele article had been addressed in a November 12, 2017 commentary here at Tracking the Leopard Meroz called Robert David Steele and His List of Crowdstalkers and Co-Conspirators:  Is Your Name On This List?

Read Document 33 at this link:robert david steele 3 1 2018 letter qt.

The Strategic Maneuvers of Queen Tut Around the Robert David Steele Defamation Lawsuit

“…because you never take a stand against deception, what you have to do is move around deception.  You have to beat them at their own game”.  Queen Tut
[Queen Tut Interview II-Hoax Wars Live, published February 23, 2018 on You Tube, 34.14 mark]

Hoax Wars: Is the legal war between Robert David Steele and Queen Tut for real, or is it just a hoax mocking the American judicial system’s method of arriving at truth through facts and evidence?

On September 1, 2017 Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network filed a civil lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division, against Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron and Queen Tut, A Woman Believed to be Known as Carla A. Howell.  The Plaintiff is seeking compensatory, statutory (three-fold the damages sustained), and punitive damages in an amount not less than $15,350,000.  In addition, the plaintiff desires “prejudgment interest on the principal sum awarded by the Jury from June 15, 2017 to the date of Judgment at the rate of six percent per year, attorney’s fees, and costs arising out of Defendants’ defamation per se, insulting words, business conspiracy, common-law conspiracy, and tortious interference with contract and business expectancies”.

Jason Goodman is representing himself (Pro Se), Patricia Negron is represented by professional legal counsel…and then there is the third defendant who is taking another strategy altogether.

Contrary to popular opinion, Queen Tut is not so ancient, after all. Her birth certificate filed with the federal court shows she is a young 80 years old, although suffering a bit of dementia, diagnosed after she forgot there is a $15 million dollar lawsuit against her.

The third defendant, Queen Tut, is known on the internet primarily through her anonymous interviews, and by her signature Trello Boards which feature the main points of her topics.

In the February 23d Hoax Wars interview, Queen Tut at the 32.11 mark says, “I’m getting to my reveal here, okay?  Because  I was fully aware of how RDS operates, because I worked in anti-corruption for many years and I’m aware of the kind of strategies that the bad guys use, okay, to manipulate and silence people.  I was involved in that very heavily for a long period of time and so when this court case was filed, I knew I was not gonna respond to it because first of all they had to serve me okay, which I have never been served um, and I knew that uh, they were just gonna try and flush Queen Tut out because they already had their hands on Jason, they already had their hands on Trish, but the whole thing is they just want to flush everybody out and you know, create chaos.”

Going back to when this defamation lawsuit was first filed, we find that on page 8 of the complaint that the statement was made that “Defendant, ‘Queen Tut’, is a person believed to be Carla A. Howell.  Howell is a citizen of New Jersey.  She is a political activist.  There is a biography of her on the internet…At all times relevant to this action, Queen Tut acted in concert with and as an agent, alter ego or instrumentality of Goodman and Negron”.

Later, without apology to Howell for falsely naming her as a defendant, the Plaintiffs filed court documents against another person who they thought might be Queen Tut, a Susan A. Lutzke who they claimed had been legally served with a court summons. Months later, when no response to this summons was made, the Plaintiffs asked the court to declare a default judgment against Lutzke.

The submission to the court of Queen Tut’s birth certificate

On February 22, 2018 a two page document comprised of a letter and a birth certificate was filed with the court stating that Queen Tut was given the name at birth of Helen Suzanne Ingraham.  The birth certificate displays a date of birth of December 4, 1937, making this new person behind the Queen Tut voice, to be 80 years old.  The accompanying letter from the daughter, Mercia Francis, claims that her mother has been diagnosed with dementia and is not providing an address or contact because of fears that Robert David Steele might send someone to harm her.

The next day, on February 23, 2018,  the attorney for the plaintiff filed an 8 page letter to the Judge indicating that they had no knowledge of Mercia Francis, the writer of the letter, and were unable to find any online information about this person.  Attorney  Steven S. Biss stated, “Defendant, Queen Tut a/k/a/ Susan A. Lutzke, does not suffer from dementia.” The rest of this letter was devoted to displaying Twitter messages from Queen Tut’s account in order to support their assertion that Susan Lutzke had “ramped up her attacks on Robert David Steele”.

Why are there no statements to the court from Carla Howell or Susan Lutzke?

What is so bizarre about this issue of who is behind the Queen Tut anonymous handle, is that neither Carla Howell nor Susan A. Lutzke has written the court to deny that they are this Queen Tut who is being sued for defamation against Robert David Steele and his nonprofit corporation, Earth Intelligence Network. The natural response of most persons to discovering that they were wrongly named as a defendant in a lawsuit would be to quickly and vehemently explain to the court that they had nothing to do with the plaintiff and demand that such persons cease and desist from continuing to make false accusations.

This new assertion to the court that Queen Tut is an 80 year old woman with dementia who is unwilling to provide an address or means of contact does little to clear up the mystery of her identity.  One has to consider that the childhood surname has since been changed to reflect at least one marriage, because the attorney for the plaintiffs were unable to discover an internet footprint of the names provided.

On February 23, 2018 a YouTube channel called Hoax Wars granted a second interview with Queen Tut.  The first interview involved her discussion of the amount of money that Patricia Negron had to pay for her legal representation, as well as remarks  about Jason Goodman and his legal strategy. In both interviews, Queen Tut is as lively as ever, with no signs of dementia or paranoia.

Before asking the Judge to declare a default judgment against Queen Tut, was she properly served with a summons as required by Federal court procedures?

In this most recent interview is the document shown below,  which Queen Tut displays in her usual Trello Board format. She has titled this board, (Double?) Agent Robert David Steele:  Active Measures Against the Internet Truth Movement…One of the pieces of evidence which Queen Tut presents to back up her arguments,  is a letter stating that Susan Lutzke had not lived in the condo apartments where Robert David Steele had claimed to have served her a court summons, since 2015.

When one reviews the Affidavit of Service which was provided by Roland Process Svc. and Investigations, LLC, it was noted that on October 11, 2017 that service was attempted, and “I spoke with a male subject stated his name was Steve. He said he has lived there for 2 years and has gotten several pieces of mail for Susan.”  On the fourth attempt, the documents were left at the door.

Should not the process server checked with the condo management regarding the tenancy of Susan Lutzke?

Given the statement by Steve Bytnar who claims that Susan A. Lutzke had not resided at the address in question since March of 2015, it would appear to the impartial observer that legal service had not been completed on Ms. Lutzke.  If that is the case, the document 30 filed in this lawsuit, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant, “Queen Tut” a/k/a/ Susan A. Lutzke seems premature because it bases its conclusion on what appears to be misinformation that proper service had been completed. This is a matter for the Judge to review and make a determination on.

Is Robert David Steele a double agent of the Russians, and employing their Active Measures strategy?

Queen Tut’s Trello Board uses the term Active Measures which refers to the set of techniques which Soviet security and intelligence departments use to influence the politics of other nations. These methods are the same as that of the CIA, Mafia style groups and others, so it is significant that Queen Tut is emphasizing a Russian link, and she ties a former KGB General’s short recommendation of one of Robert David Steele’s books to support her thesis that Robert David Steele might be a double or even a triple agent.

The Russian link is the latest fad accusation, just as the pedophilia accusation had been widely promoted last year by the social media attention getters. I am not going to go into detail with how Queen Tut lays out her argument that Robert David Steele’s actions match those of Active Measures; but if you are interested, examine her illustrated argument in her Trello Board and listen to her second Hoax Wars video.  My complaint with regard to her presentation of the Active Measures methodology of Robert David Steele is that she has not proven, with hard evidence, the assertions she makes. In fact there can be many reasons unassociated with a Soviet link, that would explain why and how Steele behaves as he does.

At the 38.51 mark, Queen Tut comments, “…basically what I was doing was giving him enough rope to hang themselves, okay?  And they did.  They did hang themselves and here’s the evidence and everyone would be able to see that when they look at the Trello Board, okay.  Now here’s the other thing that I’m going to reveal tonight that’s breaking news.  So everybody, I wanted to share this piece of it because this is significant because it shows how Active Measures are applied against people, and how attorneys with practices will lie, especially when they’re the arm of the Intel Agencies or the Intel Operations who are applying Active Measures against American citizens, for wanting to know the truth, okay?”

She explains, “So perfect example here of what they do to individuals and then we find out here of what they do to individuals and then we find out they, they lie, they don’t care about the law.  This attorney does not care about the law, okay?  Robert David Steele doesn’t care about Americans.  He doesn’t care about them.  He’s working two sides, maybe three, for who knows what kind of compensation, so here’s the big reveal.  This is, I’m gonna leave this hanging a little bit, here’s the reveal.  I am NOT Carla Howell.  Queen Tut is not Carla Howell…(40.35)…then they claimed it was Susan Lutzke, then they claimed that they served Susan Lutzke and she doesn’t even live there, okay?  And now I’m gonna let everybody know I’m not Susan Lutzke…(41.06)   in fact I have sent my birth certificate to the court about 4 or 5 days ago and it is now published on the court, in the court documents who I am, okay?”

Did Queen Tut’s “Big Reveal” clear away the fog surrounding her true identity?

The confusion of Queen Tut’s true identity has not been cleared up, despite the above proclamation.  The letter sent to the court was written by a Mercia Francis, who claims, “I am writing on behalf of my mother, known as Queen Tut…My mother has recently been diagnosed with dementia and I am now overseeing her social media and other affairs.” So why does Queen Tut say she sent the documents to the court?  Is she both Helen Suzanne Ingraham, and Mercia Francis?  Are the statements in these documents true?

At around the 36 minute mark of the Hoax Wars interview, Queen Tut is discussing the false basis on which the court summons of Susan Lutzke had been made, and she comments, “…when you file false affidavits in federal courts that’s serious…”. If there is any part of the documents filed by Queen Tut that are not true, that is also serious.

Assuming the birth certificate is actually that of Queen Tut, will it be shown later that she does not have a medically diagnosed case of dementia, and that this statement is on the artful side when the letter writer declares, “I am concerned about providing an address or contact number because my mother is fearful that Robert David Steele might send someone to harm her.  This fear could be associated with her diagnosis or his CIA background may inform that type of threat. I’m hoping this letter can be filed before any action is taken against the wrong people.”

The civil case legal process is always a slow one, as each side is allowed a time period to respond to the documentation which is filed with the court. So it may be some time before the questions which are presently being raised are answered with facts and evidence. But one item of interest should be noted.  Those who are aware that they are named in a civil case, and deliberately seek to avoid being served in accordance with standard procedures, can be legally brought into the court by other measures.

Since Queen Tut is the anonymous internet handle of a woman who has not been totally forthcoming in providing details of her whereabouts, or her personal history, it is worth mentioning that there was a defamation case filed on February 3, 2009 by Mark and Rhonda Lesher against anonymous message board posters on Topix.com. The judge in that case ordered that the IP addresses be provided in order to identify the persons responsible for posting defamatory comments against the Leshers.  In that particular case, the accusations were very serious ones which caused substantial financial harm,  and were based on false accusations which had been the basis of a criminal complaint. The Leshers were granted a thirteen million dollar judgment in the civil case, which can be read about in the articles linked here and here.

The “giving of enough rope to hang themselves” strategy

A final quote from the Queen Tut in the Hoax Wars interview at about the 42 minute mark is of interest: “…but by writing, which is what I did intentionally, I gave them enough rope to hang themselves.  And that’s a strategic way to deal with bad guys and I’m just sharing this with you guys not, to like you know, for any kind of ego scene.  I just want people to understand that when you’re dealing with evil guys or deal with criminal guys you have to be strategic, okay?  You, you can, you can react all you want and go whoa, I want to stand for truth; that’s one thing, but when you’re dealing with these guys, you have to be very, very strategic and you got to let them screw up and in this situation, they have, very, very profoundly.”

Genuine adversaries or hoaxers?

Perhaps Robert David Steele also has the same identical strategy as Queen Tut, which is to give your adversary enough rope to hang themselves.  It could be that we are witnessing the possibility that there might be two hangings in the making, if each is successful in their goals.  Who knows?  Is this a strategic duel where two adversaries end up doing each other in, a sort of ying/yang karmic cause and effect?  Both Robert David Steele and Queen Tut seem to think that they are unique in representing what has been termed the Internet Truth Movement. But there are so many accusations, so little evidence….truth is being trampled underfoot in the dust…where does that leave those who are willing to stand alone to speak the truth? I must presume that it is those persons who God has chosen to stand against deception, not those anonymous entities without the personal courage and wit to do so.

 

 

 

Robert David Steele’s Attorney Responds to Document 31: Queen Tut Letter and “Birth Certificate”

Steven S. Biss wrote Judge Lauck on February 23, 2018 a letter discussing the submission of a so-called birth certificate of Queen Tut.  See rds lawsuit 224 2018

Queen Tut’s Birth Certificate Filed as Document 31 on Robert David Steele lawsuit

Today I received the following comment on this blog:I have looked at the Robert David Steele lawsuit and find this document filed with the court as of February 21, 2018. queen tut 2 22 2018

This ought to keep Robert David Steele and his attorney puzzled for awhile.

A Question for Thus Saith Queen Tut: Are We to Conclude that the Jews Wandered In The Wilderness Forty Years To Escape The Egyptian Process Servers?

Process Server? What Process Server! I see no evidence that I have been served. Case Dismissed.

A few days before Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network filed a defamation lawsuit in Federal Court, Queen Tut displayed her research skills on a Trello Board which was linked to the Crowdsource The Truth August 26, 2017 video entitled, Unrig Cynthia McKinney.

Now, I had been given the impression that Queen Tut loved checking the facts.  After all, she and Jason Goodman had shown the crowd how to look up campaign donations and 990 forms for tax exempt businesses.

So, the first time Jason Goodman saw the summons was when she introduced him to the blog Tracking the Leopard Meroz?

So I took the time to view several videos which featured Queen Tut as a guest.  I don’t know if Queen Tut is a double agent, a poor interpreter of English language hieroglyphics,  or just Talmudically impaired, but the Trello board which Jason Goodman assured us was proof of fraud involving statements made by Robert David Steele, is false, and will be used against them in Federal Court.

Let’s see what I discovered about the Trello Board evidence, before we read the testimony of how Queen Tut showed Jason Goodman the court summons for the very first time, by reading Tracking the Leopard Meroz.

Section I:  THE TRELLO BOARD prepared by Queen Tut on a 2001 NATO HANDBOOK

Below the Trello board link, was also given a link to the NATO Handbook

The link to the Unrig Cynthia McKinney video is here. The Trello.com board link is here.

The title of the trello board is Robert David Steele’s claim that he authored the NATO OPEN SOURCE INTELLIGENCE HANDBOOK is refuted by General Kernan. 

The page of the NATO OPEN SOURCE INTELLIGENCE HANDBOOK, November 2001, which is of interest to us is the Preface page shown below in this screenshot.

Nato Open Source Intelligence Handbook, 2001, Preface Page

Here is a screenshot of the Trello Board which Queen Tut has publicized, and which the CSTT YouTube channel states is proof of “RDS’s Fraud”. What I want my readers to observe is Queen Tut’s screen shot of the bottom half of the Preface to the NATO handbook, in the fourth column.  Now what do you think my first question is going to be, when seeing that only a portion of the Preface is displayed? I have taken a screenshot of the view of the Preface page as shown by Queen Tut.The first question is, why did Queen Tut not show the entire Preface page? So I went to the original online documents to read the entire Preface, noting what information she had left off the TrelloBoard. What she left off was proof that Robert David Steele was telling the truth when he claimed that he had written a large portion of the NATO Open Source Intelligence Handbook of November 2001.

Let me explain: note that in the Preface, at the upper right of the page, the acknowledgment written by General Kernan that states,  “This publication has benefited greatly from the continued collaboration between my staff and the staff of Open Source Solutions, Inc.”

Open Source Solutions, Inc. was a corporation owned by Robert David Steele.

At robertdavidsteele.com, Steele displays his work history, and under Public Service it is stated that he was the CEO of Open Source Solutions, Inc. 1993-2010, “responsible for creating the Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) discipline world-wide…”. I found this corporation listed by the Secretary of the State of Virginia under their registry.  It is currently tagged as purged, meaning that the corporation had been inactive for more than 5 years and cannot be reinstated under that name.

Here is a link to insidegov.com which references Open Source Solutions, Inc. as a government contractor with its principal product  as Intelligence Studies. Also, here is another link which shows Robert David Steele as the President of this corporation.

So why would Queen Tut declare that General Kernan claimed that Robert David Steele had no part in the authorship of the NATO Handbook? Let’s examine the emails which were purportedly exchanged between Queen Tut and General W. F. Kernan on August 17 and August 21, 2017.

Trello Board email 1

Trello Board email 2

The first thing to bear in mind is that these emails were done using a false name, and not the legal name of the woman calling herself Queen Tut.  She claims that  she first spoke with General W. F. Kernan, telling him that Robert David Steele is a man who had made a number of false claims, and later she uses the term fraud. When General Kernan wrote back,  he stated that “Robert David Steele (had) never worked for us at NATO or JFCOM when we published this handbook.”

I do not see where Robert David Steele claimed that he had worked for NATO or JFCOM in regard to the NATO handbook. And why would he? In 2001, he was President of a Virginia state corporation called Open Source Solutions, Inc. which acted as an independent government contractor, producing Intelligence Studies. This close working relationship is acknowledged by General Kernan in the Preface of the handbook.

It is now 2017, 16 years after the publication of this book, and it appears that Queen Tut mislead General Kernan into focusing on Steele’s non existent employment record with NATO and JFCOM.  This assertion is based on the Trello Board which deliberately displays only the information which supported the false “proof” which Queen Tut desired to present.   Queen Tut misdirects the readers of her trello board to view the General’s statement on NATO and JFCOM employment records, while covering up the  actual truth that in 2001 General Kernan had acknowledged a working relationship with Open Source Solutions, Inc. which Steele owned at the time.

I have completed a partial transcription of the following video in which Queen Tut and Jason Goodman explain, through the use of Talmudic logic, why the lawsuit against them should be dismissed.  Part of the absurdity of their argument hinges on what Etano means, which is on the summons which Goodman says never was legally presented to him.  Etano means and another.  Etal means and others. The Plaintiffs are two legal entities, Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network; thus one can state “Robert David Steele, Etano”.  The defendants are three persons, Jason Goodman, Patricia Negron and Queen Tut; thus one can state, “Jason Goodman, Etal”.

In light of how Queen Tut handled the facts on her trello board, think carefully through her argumentation in the following transcription:

Section II.  Unraveling The Deep State- Conspiracy to Suppress Free Speech, Jason Goodman Crowdsource the Truth YouTube channel, dated 9/23/2017

The subtitle of this video is Someone doesn’t want you to hear the real news.

I seldom listen to videos which are being live streamed, but as it happened, I went to Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource the Truth YouTube channel  a couple of minutes prior to broadcast time; thus I was able to view the ongoing conversation in the chat room, including the sound wisdom of a viewer called John Connor. Connor is so logical that Jason Goodman gets paranoid that he is an agent of Robert David Steele.  Fortunately for Goodman, he has Queen Tut to reassure him that he is untouchable by the reason and logic of mere commoners, and that she can get him out of the mess which they are both in.

At the start of the September 23rd video, Unraveling The Deep State-Conspiracy to Suppress Free Speech, Jason Goodman says, “Welcome to  this very special late night edition of Crowdsource The Truth”, and he introduces “one of our very favorite guests, the always fantastic, full of great information…the beloved Queen Tut.  Welcome your highness…”.

In this first section of the show, Jason Goodman reviews what they had been discussing about the Deep State, mentioning Jeff Bezos, The Washington Post, the CSTT reporting with Laurel on the Cox Cable internet connection at 4809 Sprayer Street, etc.  This leads into a comment about the ability of the CIA to control the flow of information, and also a  discussion of Robert David Steele, who is a former CIA agent. At the 7.23 mark we go from the general theme of the Deep State suppression of information, to the particular events of the lawsuit involving Jason Goodman, Patricia Negron and Queen Tut of Crowdsource The Truth.

Queen Tut: (7.23) …. about the suppression of information because Crowdsource the Truth and the people involved with it are actually being actively suppressed right now and we’ve discovered that there is a very active conspiracy going on to shut us down.  In fact, we have some evidence we wanted to present to everybody.  Everybody is aware who has been regular, have been regulars here, but for people haven’t, Robert David Steele has filed a lawsuit naming Jason Goodman, Trish Negron, and myself, Queen Tut in that lawsuit for about what is, $15 million, Jason?

Jason Goodman:  Fifteen million, Queen.

Queen Tut:  And what’s interesting about that is there’s a lot of details and we’ll be going into that, but what,  why we’re bringing that up right now,  and people might be saying, “Oh, we’ve heard so much about RDS”, well there’s a reason for that because RDS is a doorway into this larger picture.  He is somebody who was supposedly CIA, he says it himself, and he’s been actively trying to shut us down for a long,  long time.

He started with Jason a number of months ago and then he’s moved on to anyone else who’s dared to address any of the UNRIG fraud which I did address and anything else that is, has kind of wheeled into that situation.  He’s come out actively to try and discredit us in any way he can, because he doesn’t want us to reveal what is happening and his MO, how he’s been operating for a number of years.  Now, something we’ve come into, some information in, ..I’m going to kind of toss this over to Jason right now so he can kind of provide like some explosive information that we can clearly say provides evidence for an active conspiracy against us..

Jason Goodman:  So before we to that to that explosive new evidence, Queen Tut, I want to talk a little bit about the conspiracy Robert David Steele has been building, and it’s been building for some time.  Many people will be aware of the individual, individual we’re about to see and he’s been active for some time (displays Defango speaking in a video).

[Also at the 11.33 mark is shown the Jewish spoof video which Defango had put on his channel, but had later removed. Jason Goodman refers to it as engaging “in racial and religious hate speech”.  At the 11:53 mark, Goodman shows the Pundit story on the Crowdsource The Truth investigation based on Laurel’s research. At the 13.29 mark the profane phone call from Frank Bacon is played, which issued a threat against Jason Goodman.  Frank Bacon mentions Defango and 50 others, who are going to do some kind of damage against Jason Goodman.]

(17.09) Jason Goodman:  …now Queen Tut has made reference to this explosive piece of evidence we’ve heard Frank Bacon there, Ty Roan, talk about how he certainly intends to do some kind of damage to me and he’s tied himself to Manuel Chavez.  We know that Manuel Chavez has interviewed Robert David Steele on his program and what I have here is a piece of evidence that he’s just recently come to light. (see screen shot of image shown at 17.38 mark)

Jason Goodman:.. you know in regard to the lawsuit that Robert David Steele has filed in a Federal Court, hasn’t served it, but he’s filed it, and we know that because it has appeared on his own website.  He’s been advertising it all over the internet.

This is an email that Robert David Steele has sent to George Webb, and he’s saying, “George for information.  A massive lawsuit is about to be filed against Jason Goodman by a lawyer who specializes in defamation cases”.  I think he, I think he left out ginning up defamation cases,  but Robert David Steele goes on to say that “Manny is the one who will be in front”.  Manny of course is Manuel Chavez III, Defango, everybody’s favorite schmuck from YouTube.

And “Manny’s the one who’ll be in front, my case will simply be in support.  Jason is buried so deep by his own words that we expect Google to shut him down completely — close his channel and delete all of his videos.  Since the videos appear in all states, this will be a multi-state filing done pro”, and then the email is cut off, so there’s more being said there, of course not quite sure what else Mr. Steele has in mind but Queen Tut, what do you make of this?

(19.06) Queen Tut:  Uhh yes, this is I feel was critical when Jason and I were talking about this today and when this email came to light we started to realize that there is these in,.. interconnecting relationships.  We already knew that Robert David Steele had one with Chavez, Manny, or what Defango whatever people call him.  The thing is that because and we knew it,  we noticed that would seem kind of bizarre that he went on to Defango show immediately after being on your show and after coming after you, uh that was a few months ago, for no reason out of the blue, you’re an erratic blow-up that he seems to be demonstrating consistently throughout, of his internet history in videos, but the next day shows up on Defango’s site.

And then we see Defango for months, going after Crowdsource The Truth, making fun of it, does that you know all the things like for example, like the video that Jason showed tonight, but as we’re talking about this and, and then actually reviewing some of these emails that have just been presented to us, um we saw this email and we were like wow, what this tells me is that this has been a long term plan…

Jason Goodman: (20.20) Yeah

Queen Tut:…on a group with a group of people who are obviously working together, there’s no doubt about it, Manny’s gonna be the front guy..

Jason Goodman:  Yep.

Queen Tut:  .. and that’s exactly what Manny’s done, is done, like very you know videos that have defamed or been like non-stop about attacking Crowdsource the Truth and everyone they can.   Manny will be the front end, then RDS is coming up the back with the lawsuit to silence us, and then we’ve got Frank Bacon who’s coming in working,  stating that he and Defango are gonna do some, some, he states that Defango are going to make it a lot more difficult for you to do just about anything.

Jason Goodman:  Yeah.

Queen Tut:  A threat!

Jason Goodman:  I mean oh yeah open threats.  I mean they claim to be digging up some dirt on me but so far everything that they’ve dug up is stuff that they’re concocted, purely manufactured nonsense,  and you know we should point out that accusing people of crimes like pedophilia, rape, sexual abuse, the various things they’ve tried to link me with this non-existent association with other individuals who I do not even know who have been accused of those crimes I mean that’s,  that’s  really not something that you should be doing if they were crying , yeah..

Queen Tut:  Well Jason this the thing we want everyone to understand and, and a lot of people already understand, that because that, these are the kind  of people who come and listen to the truth that we put out.  But this is a tactic…

Jason Goodman:  Yes.

Queen Tut:  .. it’s the same tactic used at the macro level that we’re talking about with Bezos, DARPA, CIA, Washington Post.  It’s the same tactic that RDS is using to shut down Crowdsource The Truth and by the way I absolutely believe and this is my opinion and I’ve taken a position on this time and time again,  that RDS is a disinfo agent..

Jason Goodman:  Yeah.

Queen Tut:  ..once CIA, never not CIA.

Jason Goodman:  Yep.

Queen Tut:   You know and he’s been actively doing everything he can to co-opt the truther movement on the internet and come after our, our group right away because guess what we were the ones who revealed his  basic fraud that he’s been perpetuating  from a number of years using this electoral reform act.

Jason Goodman:   mm-hmm and you know the other thing that’s amazing Queen Tut, he names Queen Tut in the suit, uh he  believes that it’s Carla,  whoever he thinks it is.

Queen Tut:   Carla Howell,  I believe.

Jason Goodman:   Carla Howell, right, but it’s important to also note that Robert David Steele has done a number of things that you know, you are a journalistic source, you initially contacted me, because you’ve been watching the program and you had evidence of fraud.

Queen Tut:  Correct.

Jason Goodman:  And our laws that protect sources.  Robert David Steele cannot force me to reveal who Queen Tut is, it’s like Deep Throat in Watergate you know there’s freedom of the press, comes with certain protections for the individuals that are essentially whistleblowers and Robert David Steele is trying to reveal who Queen Tut is, to prevent her from providing this evidence of fraud.  People should be asking themselves why is he doing that?  What is his purpose in doing that?  Is it because he’s an honest guy who wants to reveal the truth?

Or is it because he is a deceptive fraudster allegedly who wants to trick people into thinking he’s running a 501(c)(3) that’s going to create election reform when in fact all he’s doing is trying to raise money to buy RV’s so he can crash them and buy soft drinks and give gifts.  His  budget of course reveals numerous gifts to YouTube personalities.  He doesn’t reveal who those personalities are, could they be Manuel Chavez, could they be some of the other YouTube personalities we have seen promoting Robert David Steele?  Could be.   I don’t know.  what else did we want to talk about there?

Queen Tut:    Well here’s the thing that we wanted to let people know is that he has filed this suit.  And he’s,  he’s  using this suit,  this is the one thing that we really wanted to talk about and address so people could understand the tactics and see it in action, with us, you know.  We’re going to reveal this you know and reveal the tactics that they use at every level, but what he does is he’s improperly using legal institutions.

Jason Goodman: Right.  He hasn’t, he hasn’t served me, the lawsuit as you are intended to do with  a civil case.  He’s just posted it publicly on the internet in an effort to defame me to embarrass me.  Ahh again he’s trying to reveal our journalistic source right here..

Queen Tut: .. in the lawsuit.  The lawsuit is filled with a number, like numerous, fallacies.

Jason Goodman:  Yes.

Queen Tut:  It is designed to discredit and defame and embarrass and ultimately harass you know us, so that we will shut up.  He wants us to shut up about his fraud.

Jason Goodman:  That’s right.  And he seems to believe that somehow his business endeavors ahh are worth $15 million and that somehow some sort of you know his alleged obstruction of his business endeavors have done you know fifteen million dollars worth of damage but you know his business is a 501(c)(3), it’s a nonprofit organization and of course we’ve been doing so much work with Charles Ortel, uh I’m just becoming you know I wouldn’t say knowledgeable,  but I’m beginning to have some knowledge in what these 501(c)(3)’s are all about and what they’re supposed to do.

So he in the lawsuit for some reason he redacted his EIN number.  Now, this is publicly available information oh yeah, I meant to check if this was his house or this is a parking lot where the RV stays, but this is the Earth Intelligence Network,  Robert David Steele’s highly unintelligent business organization.  And for some reason he thinks his lawsuit is worth $15 million, but the total revenue in 2015 was just $25,553 so even if he wants  triplicate damages that seems more like a $75,000 lawsuit than a $15 million lawsuit.

He did have total revenues of 64,000 in 2014, but you know we’re not going to get into these 990-EZ filings right now.  I’m curious to know where 2010-2013 are, there’s probably a good explanation as to why they’re not listed here on Pro Publica,  and I’m sure if people start digging into these filings looking for any potential abnormalities or any errors and filing I don’t know if they’ll be any.  I haven’t looked at it but that that could be something that people might want to occupy their attention with could be something worth looking at.

I don’t know if Robert David Steele is dotting his i’s and crossing his t’s or if he’s too busy writing up fake lawsuits filled with fraudulent claims.  Oh but do we not have picture there on periscope and I hope everybody on periscope is healthy with the stream anyway, back to our friend Mr. Steele that’s the Earth Intelligence Network there.  Sorry Queen I got a little distracted.

Now the other things that we’re seeing online that Mr. Steele has been polite enough to publish on his website rather than properly serving me with a process server is, uh his summons in a civil action and he’s doxed me,  everybody knows I’m thoroughly doxed, he puts that on the on, on the internet which is fine.  I’ve made that mistake with Laurel and I take my lumps.

This is Steven S. Biss, Mr. Steele’s lawyer.  Many people have been looking up Steven Biss and have seen his track record there, uh what was going on with Steven Biss.  Queen, you were looking into a bit of his fine works weren’t you?

Queen Tut:  uhh, yes, I was I, um I, I’ll talk a little bit about that and then I want to adjust a little bit more about RDS’s MO here, but Steven Biss actually I wound up having a conversation with Steven Biss.  Remember we took, we talked about that.

Jason Goodman:  Yeah, I do remember that.

Queen Tut:  Yeah and when I called him up and let him know I was, I just wanted to talk to him told him this Queen Tut you know and he acknowledged who I was

Jason Goodman:  Your highness did he address you appropriately? (overlapping talk and laughter)

Queen Tut: No.  It’s too bad, because you know I think it would have been fun if he’d done that;  however, I do have a little story I’ll tell everybody about in a second about the clerk’s office at the Virginia off uhh, district court office.  But however, he I asked him a number of times, at least 3 times in the conversation when we started talking if he was the person who filed this lawsuit, his name is on it.  But I asked him 3 times and refused to answer that,  he completely avoided asked,  answering my question and I thought that was really interesting that he wouldn’t even acknowledge that he was the person who filed that that sued even though his name is on it.

And then I began to wonder why an attorney not acknowledge that when you called him up to talk and I just it was just a thought.  Like does he not really want to, was he associated with it, was he not really the one who filed it even though his name is on it, and then I began to wonder why would an attorney not acknowledge that when you called him up to talk and I just it was just a thought like does he not really want to, was be associated with it?  Was he not really the one who filed it even though his names on it?

I don’t know but maybe just maybe he doesn’t want to be associated with the fraudulent claims because being associated with fraudulent claims is not good for an attorney.

Jason Goodman:  Could it get him disbarred Queen?

Queen Tut:  It could.

Jason Goodman:  If it’s proven to be in fact that that’s the case?

Queen Tut:  Exactly.

Jason Goodman:  We’d hate to see a potentially allegedly corrupt lawyer get disbarred wouldn’t we?

Queen Tut: (laughs)

Jason Goodman:  You’ve reminded me of something of…

Queen Tut:  He’s already had sanctions leveled against him where he lost his license for maybe about a year.

Jason Goodman:  Ah, that’s sad.   I wonder maybe he could drive for Uber if he loses his license we could get him I could get him a phone call with Chris Gowen I believe and Gowen could look up an Uber job for him.  You know Queen there’s something else I wanted to share with you (shows Financial Int. Disclosure Statement filed in lawsuit) (31.25)…(Jason Goodman notes that the statement discusses not having any stock holding, debt securities conflicts of interests)…(31.34) (Jason Good man explains that he got a Pacer account to review the documents posted on the Federal Court website.)

Jason Goodman:  (32.39)…now, Queen, one interesting thing that I found you actually had pointed this out to me is that there was some other document that um, which was that,  that named…

Queen Tut: OK, are you talking about the affidavit?  Well,  I directed you towards a website that had published this affidavit and I had you look at that because that was the first time I’d seen it,  that’s the first time you’d seen it.

Jason Goodman:  Right.

Queen Tut:  Because you’ve never been served so this affidavit is, do you have that up on the window right now?

(Jason Goodman displays on CSTT,  the affidavit posted September 22, 2017 on this blog, Tracking the Leopard Meroz, representing a screenshot from the Federal Court Docket of this lawsuit.  Note that Steele had hired the process server on Sept 8, and the summons affidavit of the process server is dated Sept. 18, 2017)

Jason Goodman:  I do and (33.14)(an enlarged image shows the affidavit posted on the Tracking the Leopard Meroz website) and the thing that’s so funny is that it lists the plaintiffs as Robert David Steele comma Etano.  Now when we went and searched for Etano because we, we didn’t know who they were.  What have we done to upset Etano?  I don’t know anything about anybody named Etano, so we looked that up and we found this company.  This is Etano, (shows image) they seem to be a nice group of people here doing some heavy machine manufacturing over in Taipai, Taiwan.

And I don’t know, I haven’t looked into whether or not these guys have issued public shares, maybe this is a publicly traded company, but it would seem that that would render the lawsuit invalid if he’s you know got parties named on “the service that hasn’t been served” that aren’t named as plaintiffs in the suit.   I mean I’m no lawyer but what does this seem like to you Queen?

Jason Goodman puzzling over Queen Tut’s analysis of the summons service

Queen Tut:  Well when I saw that Etano you know and we talked discussed it and we did talk to somebody with some legal background here about this.  It’s one of the main things that popped out about this, this supposed service that was supposed to have taken place was that Etano is not a party to the suit that was filed okay?  So the fact that Robert David Steele comma Etano which indicates a business, another business, that is not literally named in the suit is put on this summons, okay?  And that absolutely disqualifies the summons from having any kind of legal weight or standing because there is no Etano on the suit.

Jason Goodman:(35.09)  You know Queen Tut it’s interesting to just know when you when you talk I get a nice opportunity to look at the comments and it’s good metadata to see how these just vehemently negative comments about how stupid our show is, and how I deserve to be sued, and all this kind of stuff are coming from these new viewers who we’ve never seen before, and you know the people that are real people rather than BOTS or idiots hired by Defango or Robert David Steele they’re, they’re coming into the comments and telling Doughboy or whoever it is to grow up and shut up etc.  I’ve just blocked Doughboy because it’s obviously not a real viewer there but that’s interesting to see.   Queen, I’d like to share it, was there anything else we wanted to talk about our friends in Taipai there.

Queen Tut: Here’s what, here’s what I’d like to talk about it, so this is a very, very important thing for people to understand.  Robert David Steele is improperly using legal institutions to as in retaliation and as  a means of suppression, to shut our channel down, to shut our ability to speak the truth and what he did with this document here is he actually put an affidavit to the court, filled an affidavit of the court stating that they have served you Jason..

Jason Goodman:  Right.

Queen Tut: …which is completely false.

Jason Goodman:  Totally false.

Queen Tut:   Not only false but right here we have the evidence in front of everybody else that this affidavit,  this summons has somebody on the summons that has nothing to do with the suit so it’s completely invalid.

Jason Goodman:  Right.

Jason Goodman Smiling, thinking that Queen Tut has proved legal misconduct in the handling of the lawsuit

Queen Tut:  So he has taken an invalid summons and written affidavit to the court, filed it to the court;  now I consider this some form of legal misconduct.

Jason Goodman:  And I consider it a form of stupidity, but that’s to be expected of course but that’s fine.

Queen Tut:  Well but  once again this is all tying into like this orchestrated collusion going on between at least 3 people we can identify who…

Jason Goodman:  …now wait a minute, John Connor who is the savior of mankind in the Terminator says that “the Latin abbreviation Et ano means and another.  It is the more precise term than et al.”  But right below it on my name it’s got “etal”, why doesn’t it have Etano on all of them?  We’ve asked legal professionals and they don’t seem to share that opinion.

Queen Tut: That’s correct. but I think John…

Jason Goodman:  John Conner is a lawyer or some who is trying to help Robert David Steele.  “I thought it was Latin legal term for “and another”.  John Connor says again.  Well is that true?  Why is that the only place that shows up?

Queen Tut:  Well we’ve been told that when the comma comes after the name then the businesses come.  You know and Etano is a business and you know there’s no Etano there’s nothing like that, it’s,  it’s  a name. And uh it done inappropriately, and by the way legal, legal documents have to be done correctly.

Jason Goodman:  Yeah,  why wouldn’t you say Etano next to my name if that were correct John Connor?  Why is it just Etano on that one ?…(38.29)….(38.38) ( shows affidavit as displayed at Tracking The Leopard Meroz)…

Queen Tut:  (39.03)…hmmm and Jason, Jason did you ever receive a document did you ever, you ever,  did you ever receive service at all?

Jason Goodman:  I did not receive service…(39.10) No process server had me sign a thing and handed me a I’ve been served before I’ve said on the channel before I’ve been divorced there was a process server who came he’s a couple times came to my office, sat there waited to see me, hand it to me, and I had to sign that I had been served.  I have not been served with this lawsuit…(39.34).

I, Jacquelyn Weaver of Tracking the Leopard Meroz, being a duly qualified Process Server, do testify that Jason Goodman and Queen Tut were served with the infamous Robert David Steele/Earth Intelligence Network lawsuit as hereby acknowledged in their September 23, 2017 video.  Jason, you should have listened to John Connor instead of accepting a  copy of the summons displayed on my blog from Queen Tut. Now, how about studying the Federal Civil Court procedures for real!

I have ended the transcription at the 39 minute mark, but click this link of the video  if you would like to hear the complete broadcast, or see if they have any more bright ideas while they await the Judge to grant the Plaintiffs a default judgment against said defendants.

As Robert David Steele might say, Stupid, Idiots, Morons Etano and Etal!