Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman Document 108: Proposed Judicial Notice of recent Jason Goodman and Queen Tut recorded phone conversation

Document 108 was filed May 3, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division in the Robert David Steele, et. al. vs Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit.

Document 108  (16 pages)  Proposed Request for Judicial Notice By Intervenor-Applicant with Certificate of Service   rds doc 108 5 3 2019

Advertisements

Who Shall Plead for Queen Tut?

Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?  Job 38:2

It was May 29, 2017, and in the twilight, in the evening, in the black and dark night (Pr. 7:9), the Watchers at SocialBlade.com observed a blip on the screen. Something is going on…a shipload of Subs has arrived in the YouTube Galaxy…it’s hovering over Jason Goodman’s New York apartment…!

It was May 29, 2017 and  the sudden arrival of 4,260 CrowdSource the TruthiCONS set off the Blip alert at the SocialBlade.com  console.

Then on June 4, 2017 alarm bells clanged as the Mother Ship which had been sighted overhead opened its doors and 207,210 zig zagging Rage Walkers descended…All humor aside, the statistical blip shown in the above screen shots is something to ponder.  At the end of April 2017, George Webb and Jason Goodman had joined together as a broadcast journalism team, and along with Patricia Negron, they began to look into the Seth Rich story. There were other stories swirling about this YouTube neighborhood at that time, so let’s narrow down our focus to the day prior to the June 14, 2017 shutting down of the Port of Charleston due to a false report from Deep Uranium to George Webb  and then to Jason Goodman, which became a public spectacle on YouTube.

So on June 13, 2017, Robert David Steele and George Webb met at a restaurant, and decided to do a spur of the moment live stream fundraiser on the Jason Goodman YouTube channel. According to Document 34 filed March 7, 2018 in the Robert David Steele lawsuit, one of those listeners of that fund-raiser just so happened to be Susan Lutzke (soon after, to become well-known as Queen Tut), who donated $25 to Steele’s nonprofit corporation,  Earth Intelligence Network.

Mr. Cati and the Shadow of Death

Also on June 13, 2017, Mr. Cati (pronounced cat-eye) was in a panic, thinking that he was a Targeted Individual by the Shadow of Death.  As a precautionary move, he  prepared a report called The CYA-To Whom It May Concern-Discussion, which was uploaded the next day on YouTube.

At the .23 mark, Mr. Cati says, “Have I got something for you. Now this report isn’t your typical Mr. Cati report, but it is a report that’s of importance to many of you who are currently confused about many of the things that are going on involving George Webb, Jason Goodman, Dave Acton, Montagraph, Lift the Veil, Defango, all with regard to the Seth Rich investigation and many, even Trish Negron- these people have all been involved in the previous days recently, leading up to today in events that have set certain actions in motion, and since those actions that have been placed into motion are dangerous, I’m going to do this report as a living testimony to leave a record of how these events transpired, because should I die in the immediate future, and I’m going to tell you why…”.

(2.44)  “I believe the Shadow of Death was supposed to visit me today and because it didn’t, I need to explain some things and leave a video record should something happen.”  At the 23.42 mark, after Mr. Cati has given all of the excruciating details of the previous days, and stated his disclaimers, he says that he believes that Jason Goodman’s angry tirade against Defango might have been inspired by the comment which Mr. Cati had posted on Montagraph’s video…

Ahhh, well, Mr. Cati is still around, and so is George Webb who Mr. Cati thought was going to be done in soon after.  Those were strange days, but as I looked around this particular YouTube neighborhood back then, it was not difficult to see the legal problems developing which have resulted in two federal civil lawsuits against Jason Goodman.

Against that backdrop, the focus of today’s article is the anonymous handle, Queen Tut, which was originally created by Jason Goodman to hide the identity of Susan Lutzke, whose research on Robert David Steele was highlighted on Crowdsource the Truth. As a result of those public reports and commentary, Queen Tut, Jason Goodman and Patricia Negron found themselves facing a defamation lawsuit.

Two months ago on September 9, 2018,  an entry of default was entered against Susan Lutzke because she declined to answer the civil complaint against her. Her rationale for this was stated in February 2018, when her Queen Tut handle explained, “…because you never take a stand against deception, what you have to do is move around deception.  You have to beat them at their own game.”

In an article I wrote on September 29, 2017, I analyzed a Trello board which Queen Tut  displayed to back up an assertion which she had made against Robert David Steele. If you want to see one of the methods by which she creates a credible looking dissimulation, you might want to read that article. I am not a fan of Robert David Steele’s political, philosophical and religious opinions, yet Queen Tut’s underhanded method of “proving” her unfounded claim, placed me in the position of having to publicly take a stand on behalf of Steele.

One must remember that shortly after Susan Lutzke donated money to Robert David Steele’s nonprofit corporation, she turned against Steele to publicly revile him, in concert with Jason Goodman.  So in essence, Lutzke was an inside operator in this whole peculiar drama.

Recently, under the guise of a different anonymous handle, “Albert of Finland”,  Lutzke had the nerve to mock one of my readers, asking him if the name he commented under was his real name.  It is, and I know his credentials.  She also accusingly asked him, “How come you never talk about the rogue CIA Double Agent RDS…? This she asks, when she herself likes to play both sides of the fence. Susan Lutzke continually promotes unproven accusations while hiding behind various internet handles.  She most definitely is not the “persecuted, revealer of truth” which she claims to be.

On September 16, 2018, I wrote an article entitled, THE OATH Above All Oaths of Robert David Steele, Chief Counsel for the International Tribunal for Natural Justice.  12 comments have been left on that post, and in today’s article I am going to address just one of them, by De Vivas.  De Vivas replied to a comment by Queen Tut, and she stated, “I have communicated with Queen Tut a number of times”, and ends by saying “I salute you Queen Tut”. Since De Vivas is another anonymous handle emanating from the same IP address as Queen Tut, it would seem that Susan Lutzke enjoys talking to herself in her imaginary world.

Using one IP address, comments have been left on this blog under eight different anonymous names:  De Vivas, Albert of Finland, Bissel (Chief Counsel RDS), Harris, Ha Ji Won, Grace, Queen Tut and Avery.  I do not mind readers using anonymous names, so long as it is not used as a cover for libel, or to manipulate facts in order to promote a false narrative. On my Contact page, I state, I welcome any comments, even those which disagree with me, as long as you sincerely explain your position.”

Because Tracking the Leopard Meroz is my website, let this serve as notice that I will not allow my blog to  be taken over by disingenuous covert manipulators operating in the comment section. I encourage critical thinking based on facts and evidence. Speculations and conclusions, especially when made by anonymous handles, which have no factual basis, and are promoted for the sole purpose of denigrating  responsible persons who write under their real name, are not welcome here.

With that said, here is the De Vivas comment under discussion today:   In response to De Vivas’ desire that this blog write an expose on attorney Biss, I replied that I had already addressed him (regarding his disciplinary actions) in a September  2017 article on Robert David Steele, called Operation WHIPLASH.

The Queen Tut Summons issue can be divided into two timelines:  the initial Complaint filed on September 1, 2017 against Queen Tut/ Carla Howell, and the Amended Complaint filed  April 13, 2018 against Queen Tut/Susan Lutzke.  So let’s go through the applicable documents, one by one.

I. On September 1, 2017 Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network became plaintiffs in a federal defamation lawsuit against three defendants:  Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron, and Queen Tut, a person believed to be known as Carla A. Howell. Steven S. Biss (VSB #32972) of Charlottesville, Virginia is counsel for the plaintiffs.

II.  The original 37 page complaint was for $15,350,000 in damages. In the introduction, the complaint explained, “This is not a case about First Amendment or protected speech.  This is a case about the conscious and deliberate destruction of a man’s untarnished name and impeccable reputation by social media vigilantes and trolls.  The Defendants are the poster children of actual malice – stalking the Plaintiffs on the Internet, publishing and republishing videos and enticing their subscribers and confederates to make and publish false and defamatory statements, all calculated to injure the Plaintiff’s reputation and business.”

III.  On page 8 sec. 7, under Parties, the Defendant, “Queen Tut”, is described as a person believed to be Carla A. Howell of New Jersey who is a political activist. The Complaint references a Wikipedia page for Howell, but does not provide insight into why Steele thought she was Queen Tut.  We are left to speculate that perhaps Steele and Howell were in opposition to each other through their Libertarian Party association in the past. The description of Howell goes on to declare,   “At all times relevant to this action, Queen Tut acted in concert with and as an agent, alter ego or instrumentality of Goodman and Negron.” I note that the complaint states that “Goodman and Negron are sophisticated high net worth individuals who have sufficient assets and net worth to pay punitive damages in the maximum amount permitted under Virginia law”. No mention is given with regard to the net worth of Carla A. Howell.

IV.  The next reference in the court docket to Queen Tut is Document 5 filed September 8, 2017. In this entry, which is 7 days after the initial complaint was filed, the document represents a Proposed Summons to Queen Tut a/k/a Susan A. Lutzke of Fort Collins, CO.  On the same day, Document 6 reflects that 3 summons were issued as to the defendants, including Queen Tut a/k/a Susan A. Lutzke. Also on the same day Document 7 was filed for a proposed summons for Queen Tut a/k/a Carla Howell of Moorestown, NJ. This was followed by a Summons being issued in Document 10 on September 12, 2017 for Queen Tut a/k/a Carla Howell.

Thus within the first week of this lawsuit being filed in federal court, the Plaintiff has identified two different persons as the defendant Queen Tut. But only one of them has been officially declared as a party to the lawsuit, and that is Carla Howell. At that time, the lawsuit had not named Queen Tut a/k/a Susan A. Lutzke as a party to the lawsuit; thus it was improper to issue a summons against Lutzke.

Anyone who has listened to the Queen Tut interviews on Jason Goodman’s YouTube channel knows that there was only one very distinctive voice behind this anonymous persona. Thus, it would be highly improbable that there could be two different women posing as Queen Tut.

V. On November 2, 2017,  Document 18 is entered on the docket as “Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Queen Tut”. A letter dated November 1, 2017 is attached from Steven S. Biss’ office to the U. S. District Court Clerk stating, “Enclosed is the Summon and Proof of Service of the Summons and Complaint upon defendant, Queen Tut c/o Carla Howell, which I am returning “Unexecuted” because we have determined through additional research that the person calling herself “Queen Tut” is Susan A. Lutzke.

Note that this letter to the court is dated almost 8 weeks after the September 8, 2017 Document 5 was submitted which first named Queen Tut as Susan A. Lutzke. In this period of time, the Plaintiff and his Counsel did not add Lutzke as a party to this lawsuit, nor did they terminate Carla A. Howell as a defendant.

Next we see Document 19 dated November 6, 2017 “Summons Returned Executed” stating Queen Tut had been served on October 25, 2017 and answer was due November 15, 2017. An Affidavit of Service is attached claiming that documents were left at the door of an address claimed to be the abode of Susan A. Lutzke. At this point we must note that the Summons In A Civil Action to Lutzke contains a false statement, as it begins, “A lawsuit has been filed against you.” That statement is false as Lutzke was not a named defendant in this lawsuit at that point in time; it was Carla A. Howell who was the person identified on the lawsuit as Queen Tut.

VI.  90 days after it was claimed that Susan A. Lutzke was served with a summons, Document 30 dated January 23, 2018 is a Request for Entry of Default as to “Queen Tut” a/k/a Susan A. Lutzke by Earth Intelligence Network and Robert David Steele.  In this 7 page document, several claims are made, including that Lutzke was duly served in accordance with Virginia Code. Further, the Plaintiffs complain that after the September 1, 2017 complaint that “defendant’s Lutzke and Goodman continued to publish false and defamatory statements”…and display a video where they discuss the Summons…and the service of process.

On page 4 of Document 30, the plaintiffs complain that “Goodman and Lutzke call Plaintiff’s Complaint “a fake lawsuit from a real idiot”. Then counsel proceeds to delineate a timeline of events to conclude that Lutzke has not answered or otherwise responded to Plaintiffs’ Complaint…therefore she is in default.  As we have noted, in agreement with our commenter De Vivas, Susan Lutzke’s name was not even on the lawsuit, and she was therefore not under a legal responsibility to respond.

VII.  Next we enter into the Twilight Zone of this lawsuit when a  letter was received as Document 31 on February 21, 2018 from Mercia Francis who claimed to be writing on behalf of her mother Queen Tut. This letter provides a birth certificate for a woman born in 1937 who does not live in Colorado, and stating that Queen Tut does not want to give her address because she is fearful that Robert David Steele as a former CIA man, might send someone to harm her.

Document 32 filed February 23, 2018 by Steven S. Biss is a letter addressed to the Judge, the Hon. M. Hannah Lauck, regarding the Mercia Francis letter. He addresses his uneventful research into the identity of Mercia Francis, and observes that Susan A. Lutzke does not suffer from dementia.  Biss documents that Lutzke as Queen Tut has set up a Twitter account.  Some of the images shown have Queen Tut referring to Robert David Steele as “the greatest plagiarizer and liar on the internet”, etc.

Document 33 filed March 1, 2018 represents a second letter from Mercia Francis on behalf of her mother, Queen Tut.  She has included 2 documents which she wants filed with the court which include a statement from the owner of the property where the summons had been served on Lutzke, plus Robert David Steele’s article called, How the Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics.  Document 34 is a letter filed on the court docket by the plaintiff and counsel in response to letters 31 and 33.

VIII. Thankfully, on March 9, 2018 in Document 35, United States District Judge M. Hannah Lauck issued an Order addressing the several issues which we have been observing in this lawsuit. Judge Lauck explains Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 (a) to the plaintiffs, noting that their complaint “does not identify Lutzke as a defendant.” She concludes therefore that, “Lutzke is not ‘a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought,’ and entry of default is not appropriate. Fed. R. Civ. p. 55(a).  Accordingly, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Motion for Entry of Default.”

The Order does not speculate as to why attorney Biss failed to change the identity of Queen Tut to Susan Lutzke on the lawsuit once he became convinced that Carla Howell was misidentified as a defendant. This negligence on the part of seasoned attorney Biss is disturbing, and I do not know if Carla Howell had contacted Biss or the Court about this misidentification.  Since Queen Tut, in a Jason Goodman broadcast, had once claimed that she had called Ms. Howell, it would appear that Howell had become aware of the accusations which had been made against her.  This error continued for almost eight months before it was corrected on the court docket!

In addition, the Hon. Judge Lauck notes that the Court has received two documents submitted anonymously, explaining that “the Court will not accept documents sent anonymously and in violation of the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure, which govern parties -and nonparties- in an action.” It was ordered that these documents remain on the record, but not accessible to the public.”  She noted in footnote 2 that the Court was concerned that docket numbers 31 and 33 contain internal inconsistencies suggesting that they were not filed in good faith.  The Court also restricted 32 and 34 as “Court Only”, as they represent the responses of attorney Biss to the anonymous claims.

The Judge probably “set aside” as Court Only documents, the Mercia Francis letters and the Plaintiff’s response, so that this case could proceed forward. At some point in the future, these documents may be inserted into the proceedings, if necessary. Although these documents cannot be presently downloaded on PACER, the Judge closed the barn door after the horse was let out.  Both this blog, and that of Steele’s had published or referred to those now hidden from public view documents.

IX.  On April 13, 2018 an Amended Complaint (rds 413 2018 doc 39)  was filed which added Susan A. Lutzke a/k/a Queen Tut as a defendant, and upped the damages another $3 million, on top of the original $15 plus million.   Carla Howell’s name was terminated as a party in this lawsuit on April 19, 2018.

Documents 40, 41 regard a new summons to Susan Lutzke at a new address in Fort Collins, CO. Affidavit of Service was shown in Document 61 on July 25, 2018. Document 64-1 filed on August 21, 2018 represents a letter send via email and regular mail to Susan Lutzke stating she had been served with process, and noting the videos which demonstrated that she had “actual knowledge of the pendency of the lawsuit”.  The rest of the letter discusses the continuing efforts of Queen Tut to “disparage and defame” the Plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs entered a motion for entry of default against defendant, Susan A. Lutzke a/k/a “Queen Tut”. This was granted in Document 66 on September 6, 2018.

X.  In conclusion, Susan A. Lutzke was, in the end, properly served with the Robert David Steele lawsuit.  She chose not to respond to the complaint in regard to her own words and actions, despite the fact that the Carla Howell error allowed her an extra eight months to respond to the complaint. Since the other two defendants were properly served in the beginning, they had less time than Queen Tut did, to answer the complaint against them.

In regard to Susan Lutzke’s self imposed martyrdom, one cannot complain about due process while at the same time actively evading the means which our nation’s laws provide for a defendant to respond with a written, reasoned, orderly argument regarding a plaintiff’s complaint.

I am not an attorney, so I am just guessing that one of the reasons for the time delay in the Judge addressing Negron’s motion to dismiss, might be that it has taken months for  Queen Tut aka Susan Lutzke to demonstrate that she was not going to plead her case in court. Although each defendant must answer for his/her words and actions individually, it must be noted that in this lawsuit triple damages were requested because the Plaintiff is treating them as a “unit” acting in concert with one another.  I am speculating that the Judge would want to have all 3 defendants submit their pleadings prior to her considering how this lawsuit should proceed.

Susan Lutzke is an extroverted person who is comfortable speaking in public, and she claims to be a researcher. The title of this article asks, Who shall plead for Queen Tut? Queen Tut was created by Lutzke and Jason Goodman to act as a kind of golem to avenge them of an adversary. The problem for Lutzke is that her fictional cover has been exposed, and she is legally accountable for the words spoken by her internet handle. She could have pleaded her case in court, presenting evidence and speaking the truth, as a pro se defendant.

However, the federal court system has procedures for evidence and sanctions for perjury.  Perhaps the creator of Queen Tut does not want a piercing light to shine on her words and actions.

UPDATE (listen with discernment, but interesting discussion):  Steve Outtrim interview of Queen Tut 11/29/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entry of Default Has Been Entered Against Susan A. Lutzke aka Queen Tut in Robert David Steele Defamation Lawsuit

Yesterday, September 6, 2018, Document 66 was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division, Case 3:17-cv-00601-MHL.

This one paragraph Entry of Default reads:  IT APPEARING by affidavit of counsel for the plaintiff, Robert David Steele, that the defendant, Susan A. Lutzke, has failed to appear, plead or otherwise defend this action within the prescribed time allowed as otherwise provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, default is hereby entered against defendant, Susan A. Lutzke.

Link:  rds queen tut default 9 6 2018

FYI: Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network Issue Motion for Entry of Default Against Queen Tut

I was wondering when this would happen, as Queen Tut aka Susan Lutzke had failed as of November 15, 2017 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. The Plaintiff is asking $15.5 million dollars for defamation in this Federal lawsuit.  On January 23, 2018, the Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant, “Queen Tut” a/k/a/ Susan A. Lutzke.  see queen tut default

Tuttering Over A Cliff: It is a long drop into the real world from where Queen Tut stands

One of my readers sent me a link to Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource The Truth video dated December 27, 2017, Meme Wars-Are Deceptive Operatives Conducting Psychological Warfare In Plain Sight?, with the suggestion that I listen to a comment by Jason Goodman on his former guest, Queen Tut.

It was Jason Goodman who claims to have invented the pseudonym, the mighty Queen Tut, for his previously hidden source, Susan A. Lutzke.  However, since September 1, 2017,  Queen Tut, and Patricia Negron, along with Jason Goodman were named as co-defendants in the Robert David Steele defamation lawsuit filed in Federal Court. And we are beginning to see that this lawsuit has permanently changed the dynamics of the relationships between them.

At the 14.24 mark, Jason Goodman says, “…Queen Tut is no longer a source.  Queen Tut has revealed herself to be someone who wanted to infiltrate this organization and made false statements on Hoax You Tube channels with the specific intent of damaging me.  If Queen Tut decided that what you and I were talking about were not true and went onto a channel to share her opinion of what was true or talked about something that we’re doing that was criminal or wrong, that would be one thing, but she hasn’t done that.”

On the same day, December 27, 2017, the Hoax Wars YouTube channel featured their video, The Queen Tut Tapes #1:  Trish Has Spent Over $8,000 Defending RDS Lawsuit Thanks to Jason Goodman.  This video starts with a partial display of a letter from Queen Tut saying, “Charles, I have always admired your work.  As you know, I was a part of many shows that were produced by JG.  I was responsible for a lot of research and work that went into each show that I did.  I also provided public Trello links where people could access the research that supported my information provided in the CSTT shows.  I have been doing research and analysis as a career for a number of years.”

She adds, “It came to my attention that Jason may have been nominated for an award that in my perception he really does not deserve.  One of the reasons that I will not do a public show with Jason has to do with his proclivity to date 18 & 19 year old girls…”.

As Tracking the Leopard Meroz had observed on September 29, 2017, in this article on Queen Tut, her research on at least one Trello board concerning Robert David Steele, was dishonest in her conclusion as the evidence she presented was distorted to “prove” her point. That particular display was mentioned in the Robert David Steele lawsuit against Queen Tut.

In the second paragraph of the letter which she wrote to Charles of Hoax Wars, she claims she has heard that Jason Goodman may possibly be eligible to receive some kind of award, but she does not state any details.  Given that her justification for leaving Goodman’s show concerns his dating women who are 25 years younger than himself, one has to wonder if the 62 year old Lutzke’s disaffection was rather that she felt slighted in not also being nominated for whatever award Jason Goodman was eligible for.

During the period of time that Queen Tut was a hidden source for Jason Goodman’s shows, she did not concern herself with having her research attributed to her real name.  In fact, she was gleeful in being able to create confusion for Robert David Steele by her false name, and thus it was Carla Howell who was falsely identified in the lawsuit as the woman behind the Queen Tut persona. While Queen Tut on air had said that Carla Howell was an innocent party, the fact remains that Lutzke did not do the honorable thing at that point in time and take responsibility for her own public words and research.

The 12/27/2017 Hoax Wars video which published  the letter from Queen Tut,  also featured an audio of her voice.  Beginning at the 2.43 mark, she is heard to say,  “…and she (referring to Patricia Negron) spent thousands of dollars and Jason’s strategy, and he told me this, I have it in an email, is that, if they’re waiting to let Trish’s attorney get the case dismissed, then he doesn’t have to spend any money.  So that’s the status of the lawsuit.  He’s basically hanging Trish on this one, too.”

The voice of  a male interviewer is heard to respond, “Wow, when you say hanging her out to dry…”.  And then Queen Tut continues, “He’s hanging it out because she is the one who’s spending all the money but he was really the prime target of the, of the whole lawsuit, yet she’s the one who’s taken action and had to pay an attorney to do a number of motions, so Jason’s just decided to sit back and let her do it, so once she gets the case dismissed after paying thousands of dollars, he can go forward with what her attorney did, take the actions her attorney did and not spend any money.”

A general review of the docket of the Robert David Steele defamation lawsuit filed September 1, 2017 in the U. S District Court, Easter District of Virginia (Richmond) shows that three parties are being sued:  Jason Goodman (PRO SE), Patricia A. Negron (represented by the law firm Kaufman & Canoles PC out of Richmond), and Queen Tut, who is still shown on the case title as “a woman believed to be known as Carla A. Howell”.

On October 6, 2017 Jason Goodman filed his Answer to the Complaint which had been presented against him by Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network. There have been no further actions on the docket regarding Goodman’s answer.

In the mean time, Patricia Negron had asked for a time extension, and having received it, filed a MOTION to Dismiss on November 8, 2017. There has been activity on the part of both the plaintiff and defendant Negron regarding her motion, up until December 8, 2017.  Thus Jason Goodman is in the position to gain some pointers from Negron’s attorneys, who are being paid at her expense.

However, should Patricia Negron succeed in getting her part in this lawsuit dismissed, the lawsuit still stands with regard to the other two defendants.  Each must plead their own case, even though Robert David Steele is trying to group them as co-conspirators.  What stands out is not Jason Goodman’s PRO SE strategy, but docket item 19 on November 6, 2017 stating, SUMMONS Returned Executed.  Queen Tut served on 10/25/2017, answer due November 11/15/2017. (Attachments: #1 Letter) (jsmi,) (Entered 11/06/2017).

Queen Tut has not answered this lawsuit at all, and it is a month and a half past due the November 15, 2017 deadline. As I understand it, she is claiming that she has not been served properly.  Here are the documents on file in regard to The Summons of Susan LutzkeIt would seem  that Susan Lutzke is tempting fate,  in that she could lose this case by Default, if in fact the Judge deems the Summons to have been properly served.  We shall have to wait to see how this matter progresses.

At the very least, Susan A. Lutzke aka Queen Tut  is a hypocrite for criticizing Jason Goodman for his PRO SE strategy of trying to glean some legal arguments for free from  Negron’s attorneys.  Is that not what Queen Tut is also doing,  when she  drags her feet, hoping that the other two defendants will come forth with the legal arguments necessary to overturn their cases?

 

 

 

ROBERT DAVID STEELE & His List of Crowdstalkers and Co-conspirators: Is Your Name On This List?

For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged:  and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.  Matthew 7:2

On September 1, 2017 a $15,500,000 lawsuit for defamation was filed in the U. S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia-(Richmond), by attorney Steven Scott Biss, on behalf of plaintiffs Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network against three defendants,  Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron and Queen Tut a woman believed to be known as Carla A. Howell. 

Yesterday I used my PACER account to look at the court docket of this lawsuit and noticed that a summons had been served on Susan A. Lutzke of Fort Collins, Colorado, who is now known to Crowdsource The Truth viewers as Jason Goodman’s repeat guest, Queen Tut. Because of this identity change of one of the defendants, I then wanted to know if Robert David Steele had effectively cleared the public record of his false accusations that Carla A. Howell, who is connected to the Libertarian Party, had defamed and injured his reputation under the internet handle, Queen Tut.  I see that Howell’s name still appears on the lawsuit.  Will Ms. Howell now sue Mr. Steele using the exact charges that he accused her with?

One has to wonder if Steele had long considered Carla A. Howell to be his personal adversary since he had been so hasty to accuse her of slandering him under a pseudonym. This is a reasonable question given that he has stated that he is  composing an enemies list of those who disagree with him, which he desires to add to his lawsuit.

When I entered Susan A. Lutzke’s name into a search engine, not much came up, except two internet posts of note. The first is a screenshot of a Twitter message which declares that Queen Tut is Susan A. Lutzke, and gives one of her addresses of record.

The second reference to her name is found in this article written by Robert David Steele on November 8, 2017 called #GoogleGestapo -Censorship and Crowdstalking Made Easy:  How The Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics. This article only states, “…and ‘Queen Tut’ now known to be Susan Lutzky(sp).”  I reviewed this lengthy article which Medium.com says takes 37 minutes to read, and have a few comments to make on the content. I have put Robert David Steele’s words in black and my comments in maroon.

**********************************************************************************

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” (John 8:32)

It is a common writer’s device to showcase a quotation at the beginning of an article which embodies an underlying principle of the topic.  In today’s post I have begun with a quote from Matthew 7:2, For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

Robert David Steele begins his article with a quote from the Bible also; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. This is a quote used by many persons, even atheists.  But this is but the second half of a sentence spoken, and when you quote the entire words, the meaning is altered from a general “truth” to God’s truth as spoken.  The entire sentence should read (John 8:31-32) Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then ye be disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

You see, by only quoting half a sentence, Steele has altered the meaning of the word truth, as it is defined by the actual speaker of that sentence. Now why would he do that? I suppose that he wants you to think that he is interested in truth, even while he is in the act of lying about how the word truth is used in its actual context.

Steele likes to  complain that he is misunderstood because his critics have not read his Amazon.com book reviews which he claims contains great knowledge. Recently, I had spent several days reading a broad sample of his book reviews, as my intent is to be as impartial as possible.   One of those book reviews I read by Steele was on Christ’s Ventriloquists:  The Event that Created Christianity by Eric Zuesse.  Steele titles his review, Christianity is Fraud Subordinated to Empire, New Testament Written By Enemies of Jesus & Judaism. He walks in agreement with the unbelieving Jewish author, Zuesse, that throughout history,  God was powerless to preserve his own words in writing.

This is a speculative account based on personal experience and broad reading.  In no way is it a substitute for a proper legal discovery process-but it could be useful in guiding such a process.

This is the first sentence of the actual essay, after the lead quotation from the Bible on Truth.  Steele hedges his words by saying his thoughts are opinion, i.e. speculative, and we see that he has a goal in mind in revealing his words.  That goal has to do with a lawsuit where he is Plaintiff extraordinaire. He thinks it would be a good thing if Roger Stone, representing an Alt-Right white male would team up with an Alt-Left black female who goes by the handle Charlie Peach, and which he implies, by innuendo, might be Cynthia McKinney…to do what? He wants them to jointly sue Twitter.

If Roger Stone and “Charlie Peach” were to sue Twitter together, in combination with my own lawsuit against three apparatchiks and their many co-conspirators, and the new potentially formidable case by Prager University against Google, You Tube, and DOES 1-25, I believe these three cases and perhaps others might converge in a most constructive manner assuredly in the public interest.  The above juxtaposition is important-the Deep State is seeking to censor and in some cases digitally assassinate both those on the right and those on the left who challenge official narratives.  This is discrimination based on political affiliation or belief.

In previous articles I have noted his lust to sue just about anyone who does not properly admire his achievements.  One of those high points of his life is his claim to having once headed up a CIA false flag operation in South America.  By boasting of this, Robert David Steele is saying in essence that he is without a conscious whatsoever about committing criminals acts in which someone else is framed. Right now, he has retired from his CIA and government military contractor hey-days, and he wants to be a tax exempt change agent for the Presidential election process.  It appears his favorite method of change is the Federal Civil Lawsuit so that he can FORCE the legal discovery process to reveal hidden facts which he can use for his preplanned purposes. 

Below is a partial listing of specific trolls for whom I have in hand copies of defamatory statements suitable for submission to a Court, for YouTube only.  I have another list and copies of defamatory statements for Facebook.  Every single one of these individuals is discoverable in true name via legal discovery, and can be held to account as a crowdstalker and co-conspirator.(I have made 2 screenshots representing the You Tubers, below):

Is your name or internet handle on this list of 247 persons which Robert David Steele is accusing of being a crowdstalker and co-conspirator?  If so, he wants to add you to his list of defendants who he is accusing of defamation in a Federal lawsuit.  I will only note one name as it is well known…that of Omegashock, #161 on the list.  John Little has a blog named Omegashock and he is pro-Israel, so I assume that is his “crime”.    However, whenever I have read his blog and how he discusses the issues with his readers, he is always a gentleman. 

I recognize a few other handles by virtue of having read their comments on some videos which I have viewed. Once I observed, Robert David Steal, #183 commenting on Crowdsource The Truth, during live streaming.  Robert David Steal is hilarious, but one time when I was laughing at his comments, he went over the line, and Jason Goodman, #91 on the above list and one of the defendants in Steele’s lawsuit,  shut him down.  So how could anyone accuse those two of being co-conspirators?

In my direct personal experience, these troll armies are very capable at persistent pervasive crowd-stalking.  Every YouTube channel I have appeared on has been attacked (not just current, but past), to the point that most of my hosts have been forced to disable all comments, depriving the honest viewers of the interaction that I take pains to provide when not being crowd-stalked..  Many hosts have not invited me to return, perhaps influenced by the demonetization (“shadow banning”) of any interview with me rather than the substance of my work that led to my being recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize in January 2017….[Under the subtitle, Media “Hit Jobs” On Demand]…During a two-hour interview with Alex Jones…in answer to a caller who in retrospect may have been setting me up, did I address children sent into space on “20 year and out missions” to leverage growth while in transit; and an existing colony on Mars, established fifteen years ago, with 10,000 people there now.  The Daily Beast conflated these three completely separate factual concepts to discredit me.

The troll army accusation follows the list of persons which Steele wants to bring into his lawsuit as co-conspirators with the defendants Goodman, Negron and Queen Tut.    Then he launches into other problems he has had with his reputation, including his  belief that there is a colony of persons on Mars which have been living there for the past fifteen years. Robert David Steele thinks that his nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize should override any other perceptions that the public may have that he is a kook, one whose credibility hinges on his strange Hall Of Fame status on Amazon.com as a book reviewer.

As someone who has managed a false flag operation for the CIA, and who is a top published author on the topics of deep state, false flag operations, pedophilia, and fake news (and rarely but sometimes about the holocaust and Zionist subversion), I speculate that my non-profit educational website is triggering just about every flagword on the Deep State/Zionist watchlist–a watchlist that is “Top Secret” and not subject to any form of Congressional or judicial oversight….All Paths Lead to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)…

Robert David Steele never takes personal responsibility for his own reckless words and actions, or how they are seldom backed up by facts and evidence which are relevant to the assertions he publishes. 

Now in this article Robert David Steele says that his opinions are speculative.  I find it interesting that the document recently filed in his lawsuit, entitled, Defendant Patricia A. Negron’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion To Dismiss the Complaint, has this statement, “A complaint must be dismissed if it does not allege “enough facts to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.” Bell Atl. v. Twombly, 550 U. S. 544,570 (2007).  The plaintiff’s “[f]actual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.”

Under Argument, we find this, “To state a claim for defamation, the Plaintiffs must show (1) publication, (2) an actionable statement, and (3) the requisite intent…Words that are “merely offensive or unpleasant statement” are not defamatory. Id. To be defamatory, the words must make the plaintiff appear “odious, infamous, or ridiculous.”

And therein lies the problem:  it is Robert David Steele’s own words that make him appear odious, infamous, and ridiculous.  Robert David Steele ought to be suing himself.

 

John Little of Omegashock has answered RDS in his November 17, 2017 post.  To read it scroll past his main article until you reach the link to the Meroz article.

 

 

 

FYI: Robert David Steele lawsuit update on Patricia Negron

November 8, 2017 Defendant Patricia A. Negron’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss The Complaint    (click on pdf link below)

earth intelligence networks negron motion to dismiss

Also of interest is that a certificate of service shows that Queen Tut’s legal name is Susan A. Lutzke of Fort Collins, Colorado