The Anonymous Vendetta Destroying Truth & Cloaking the Hidden Respecter of Persons

Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. 2 Timothy 3:8

I have been pondering the documented words of Steve Quayle as evidenced by the screenshot below which is taken from John Little’s OmegaShock post dated January 12, 2017.john-little-4-2The lady causing all the trouble which was referred to in the subject line of this email is Barbara Frieseman, who on August 24, 2015 had filed a web complaint assigned number 2015-cp08241600333 with the Michigan Attorney General’s Department of Consumer Protection.  I was rereading the file of correspondence in connection with this complaint, and one of the final comments by Barbara asked, Why does a 68-year-old disabled woman have to police abuses of interstate commerce and lies herself?  I do not have the $20,000 that I was quoted by a lawyer to even start a case.  The seller has my money and I have expensive paper weights that I would take such a loss on that it is unwise to sell at this time.

Since about March 2015, I have corresponded with Barb about many subjects and our friendship is based on an agreement to disagree with each other.  One of the things I like about her is that she is very candid and humble about her own failings in life; therefore the revilings which she has received from Steve Quayle are undeserved. Because of acts of intimidation which have been made against her from several persons, she has had to make official police reports as a means of documenting these threats.

Steve Quayle has on numerous occasions reproved those who oppose him using written words, by justifying himself that he has lead 10’s of thousands to the Lord via his radio broadcasts. Apparently he is up there among the greatest evangelists known to history. Now we know that the Bible reveals that only a very few persons in human history will be seated in heaven as elders, and we know that some Christians will have more rewards than others. But despite these special honors, James 2:1 says, “My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.”

One of things which drew me to a closer examination of the Steve Quayle and Pastor David Lankford relationship in 2015 was their lofty disdain which they displayed for the ordinary Christian who cannot claim the same quantity of works which they boast of. If someone dares to address the aspect of quality, and the person speaking is a Christian who cannot boast of quantity, these two men deem the critic as beneath contempt. Now when it comes to works and the intents of the heart,  the Lord has his way of measuring the words and actions of the least of the flock to the greatest, so that there is an equal playing field.  One such “leveling” scripture is Luke 16:10, He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much:  and he that is unjust in the least is unjust also in much.

Now on November 25, 2016, I was sent the message below  by someone who hid  his real identity, but he is an example of The Anonymous Vendetta Destroying Truth.  I did not approve the comment which I show below,  as well as a couple of others of his that involved sneering at one of the readers of my blog, so this matter went unpublicized until now. Look at it for just a moment and comprehend what this person was stating.meroz-comment-from-mossad-3

First, the comment heading claims that it was sent by Jacquelyn Weaver of trackingmeroz.com/author/starlitgardens. I did not write that comment.  It represents a falsification of my identity, and therefore is subject to criminal penalties. The comment was submitted by mossadalumiactive@gmail.com with IP address 93.115.95.207.  This commenter also falsified a couple of more comments mocking the name of one of my readers. Those were submitted under a different IP address, 204.85.191.30.  I also received an email at the same time as shown below giving another form of  IP address for mossadalumniactive@gmail.com.  The spelling of this email address is one letter different from the above screenshot which is missing the “n” in alumni.meroz-email-1125-2016-mossad-2The threat that was made to me was this:  Ever heard of IP address spoofing or masking.  I can make you look like me or I can pretend to be you with your ip address and do all kinds of dirty workz.

So while Steve Quayle is threatening that he is going to reveal documented  evidence in a lawsuit aimed at any blogger or internet commenter who dares to speak a word against him, one of the devils of this world is threatening to do the dirty work of planting false documentation on the internet in the name of Jacquelyn Weaver, the author of Tracking the Leopard Meroz.  Steve Quayle’s threats of revealing evidence and involving others in a lawsuit had  better represent true and authentic documents, otherwise his legal efforts may yet backfire on him. If his own attorney cannot discern between the true and false spellings of Stephen Quayle and Douglas Hagmann on legal filings submitted by their law office, one has to wonder what else is going to be presented to the Court.

Now I may be one of the least in the kingdom of God, yet Jesus Christ has assigned works for me to do throughout my lifetime.  Even before I believed in Jesus Christ, it appears that my life was already heading in a certain direction.  I can recall being on the playground for recess in the third grade, when two boys who were having a dispute came up to me.  One of them said, “Jacquie is always fair, let’s let her decide.”  And they presented me with their arguments and I decided between them.  Now I have no idea what it was about me that made them think I was an impartial judge. I was not a Christian then, but my father had introduced me to the idea of impartiality in judgment.

Years later, when I was a front-line manager, my employees liked the fact that I was fair and played no favorites. Much of what I have done in life, such as auditing bank records,  involves weighing  factual evidence against a standard.  In 1988, the Lord set me up in a situation which required me to weigh in the balances,  the top administrator of Child Protective Services in Austin, Texas. I apologize for using an example which involves me; however, since my words are in the crosshairs of Jannes and Jambres, I would like to display their folly of dismissing the lesser servants of Jesus Christ as worthless.

I have been married for 32 years, and this story I am about to tell occurred early in our marriage.  I first met my husband at a business conference in El Paso.  He lived in Houston and I lived in  Amarillo with my 4 year old daughter.    At the conference, he asked for my phone number, and since he seemed like a nice guy,  I gave it to him with this statement:  “You can have my phone number, but here are a  dozen reasons why you should not call me-I am not a catch. I am recently divorced, I have a little 4 year old girl to care for,  I receive no child support, I just bought a little house and have lots of bills to pay. There is no furniture in my living room, other than an aluminum lawn chair and I cannot afford to buy anything more for at least a year”.

Despite that warning, he called and then flew out for a visit.  When he arrived, I tossed him the car keys and said “OK, you can take me, my daughter and my little niece to the zoo and then it is lunch at McDonalds. You’re paying”.  I was 34 at the time and Gary was 47, working for a stock brokerage firm, divorced with no children, and he was used to a country club style of living, boating, a life of leisure, without any substantial responsibilities. At the end of the day, he decided that our excursion to the zoo was one of the best days of his life, and so he kept flying back to Amarillo every weekend.  Months later we married, and later we had a daughter, making us a family of four.

When we were married about 4 years, we built a little 2 story Cape Cod house in Seguin, Texas on almost a half acre which featured a creek in the back and 100 year old Spanish Oak trees. My husband traveled 4 days a week, and I served as his secretary. His travel agent told him of a little daycare in town which took care of her young daughter, and he thought it would help me get the office work done if he signed our daughter up for a couple of 4 hour days per week at this daycare.

One day when my husband was away, I went to the daycare to get my daughter although it was nap time.  Now we had been told by the day care  that we were not to come at that hour, and I understood that they did not want sleeping children disturbed.  But also I considered I had a right to go to the daycare at any time without notice, as a safeguard of my daughter.  Now one of the traits I have from my childhood is the ability to walk through the woods, observing nature, silently.  It drives some people nuts that I have this ability, because I can glide into a room without anyone hearing me.  And so the day I walked into the daycare during nap time, no one heard me come through the front door, or walk across the wooden hallway and into the nap room.

As I entered the room, one of the daycare workers, who was not my daughter’s teacher, was on her knees over the travel agent’s daughter, screaming threats at her that she was going to duct tape her mouth if she didn’t stop crying. Then she suddenly looked up and saw me standing there as a witness.    I retrieved my daughter and said nothing.  Now I am not someone that immediately launches into a tirade the moment I see something wrong.  I decided to wait for my husband to get back from his trip so I could discuss how to handle this situation, as it involved the daughter of his friend, the travel agent.

A day or so later, my husband arrived home and it was time for dinner so while he was grilling some meat outside,  I baked the potatoes and made a salad in the kitchen. The phone rang, and I answered it. A woman on the line said she was from Child Protective Services and in a loud and demanding voice she said that we had to bring our two year old daughter to the CPS office to be videotaped at 8 pm that night.   I felt as if an arrow had been shot into my heart. In hindsight,  I do believe that I blanked out portions of what the caller said, as I fell into a state of  shock over the demands made.  I went and got my husband so he could talk with her. He told the woman that there was no way we were bringing our daughter out to some strange place at 8 pm to be videotaped by total strangers.  Then he called a local attorney to find out what our rights were.

The next morning the Child Protective Services social worker came with a car full of her children.  She told them to stay in the car, but she took out her baby to hold in her arms, while she told us of the accusation which had been filed.   Apparently someone had phoned in an anonymous complaint, saying our 2 year old daughter told them that while I was away at work, her father was raping her. Now it was my husband’s turn to fall into shock. It was an impossible situation which had been told, as I did not work an outside job where my husband would ever be alone with Sarah.  We have what some call a 1950’s  traditional marriage, and other than holding our daughter, and playing with her, my husband  never changed diapers, gave baths, or dressed her. While our 2 year old daughter had wonderful language skills for her age, she could not have articulated the imaginary tale that was told.

We refused the videotaping demand, but granted an interview between our daughter and the CPS worker in her bedroom, and with an adult witness.  What saved us in the end was the testimony of our oldest daughter, who was a very credible witness at age 9. I took our youngest daughter to the doctor to be examined to see if the daycare had abused her, and was retaliating with a false report to turn the tables. It took CPS 40 days to mark our case as unfounded, and it felt like 40 days in hell. My husband became withdrawn out of sorrow, and he was afraid to hug either of his own daughters. He is almost 13 years older than me, and is from that generation of men who never cry.  When I saw tears well up in his eyes, and he turned away, I decided to take action to defend his honor.

Mother and Daughter defenders of the truth

Mother and Daughter defenders of the truth

I went to the public library and read the Texas laws on Child Protective Services, including their detailed procedures of following up on anonymous complaints. I found out the line of authority and what the official office was over CPS.  And I found out how to make an official complaint about the Social Worker, who unprofessionally brought her children to my house during her hours of duty. I wrote a letter of complaint to the highest authority, detailing how the events had transpired, and compared it with their official procedures.  Some time later, I received a letter back advising me that they had reprimanded the Social Worker.  Other than that, the letter was a total white wash. So I called CPS and asked to speak face to face with the top personnel in charge, and they made an appointment.

On the day of the appointment, I had to drive  from Seguin to Austin which is about an hour away.  Even 29 years ago, security at the CPS building was tight, and so I waited in the lobby with the security guards while someone came downstairs to escort me to their office.  I met for 3 hours with the top Administrator, a lawyer, and another department head.  I am soft spoken and like to lay out my arguments in a reasoned, orderly fashion, and they listened patiently. I wanted them to understand the impact on my family which their behavior caused, when they decided to operate on the assumption that my husband was GUILTY as accused by an anonymous person.  Impartiality was not a virtue which CPS displayed in our case.

At one point I quietly stated that the letter I had received in answer to mine was written by a person who was not a truthful and honest person.  Now the person who had signed the letter was a man, but unbeknownst to me, the actual writer of the letter was the top Administrator, a woman, in front of me.  Her face went white, and she gasped, as she confessed that she had written the White Wash.  Apparently the Holy Spirit was using my words to convict her heart of not dealing with me in a truthful and plain manner.

Now my main points were this:  CPS has a legitimate purpose in society, as there are children who are in fact abused by those who have authority over them.  The Texas laws have prescribed sound procedures for conducting interviews, which respect the rights of those being interviewed. CPS has been given a Big Stick to enforce these laws, but it is a travesty of justice to employ this Big Stick during the first phone call. At that time at least 50% of the anonymous complaints were declared as Unfounded. In other words, no evidence whatsoever was found to substantiate the accuser’s statements. Under American law, the accused has the right to face his accuser. But because this right has been overturned by CPS laws, I told CPS that they have a legal and a moral obligation to ensure that they remain impartial while investigating anonymous complaints and it is their duty to find out what the truth is.

In our case, CPS did not follow interview procedures and treated my husband as if he was guilty from the moment they first notified us by phone. I found it interesting that in the 3 hour discussion, they only refuted me on one point, and they did that with a smirk.  I had confused some civil point with a criminal point; but since I am not an attorney, it was a rather rude display on their part.  At that time, CPS took anonymous complaints and immediately filed a report with the police, who we associate with criminal law; yet CPS’s other actions are generally in the civil area of the law.

Here was CPS’s excuse:  social workers are not highly paid, therefore you cannot expect high principles from them.  I retorted that persons with high principles will apply them regardless of how much they are paid. And I have seen this exemplified by many persons who I have met, who despite having meager resources, behave in a noble manner. Now I am the least in the kingdom, and so my sphere of influence has always been small.  However, when I managed a group of eleven persons, I was able to elevate the behavior of my employees by setting forth high standards. The key to doing this was that I showed by my own conduct what I was expecting.  I did not have a double standard.

When it comes to present day Christianity, it appears that many of the so-called anointed Watchmen leaders have a double standard.  Their attitude is Rules are for those other people. But earlier in this post, I held up just one scripture which should be pondered, despite the fact that we all fail in this as in other rules set forth from the throne of God. He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much:  and he that is unjust in the least is unjust also in much. (Luke 16:10)

Every Christian has gifts, talents, and works which are ordained for him to faithfully employ in the situations of life which they find themselves in. I would like to put in a good word for Barbara Frieseman, who has attempted to do what is right. If you are one of those critical of her efforts, perhaps she would not have had to be involved in exposing the works of darkness of Jannes and Jambres and the lesser magicians, if you had stepped up and done what is right.

Yes, why indeed does a 68 year old disabled woman have to police abuses of interstate commerce and lies herself?

Think twice, Steve Quayle when you pride yourself in gathering evidence in which to bankrupt a few bloggers and internet commenters by involving them in the defamation lawsuit which involves your own words which you yourself documented on the internet, and spoke during your radio broadcasts.  Think twice, Pastor David Lankford when you look down your nose at the least in the kingdom of God as worthless. The Lord uses the least of his servants to confound the mighty.

Advertisements

The Depths of The Great Owl: Tales From Camp Cryptologic

On a dark and stormy night in MOOtana, two men huddle around a bonfire at Camp Cryptologic, staring at each other in despair.  A Third Man stands with outstretched arms holding up a lightning rod, praying for illumination.  Finally the Second Man breaks the eerie silence to launch into a rant against &*%*^, the author of Tracking the Leopard Meroz, who he considered was beneath his intellect when she thought that his recent video The Tactic of Lawfare to Silence Truth Seekers… should have been titled The Tactic of Law-ghter to Silence Truth Tellers. 

The First Man assured everyone that he was getting ready to SLAPP her.  “We are proceeding with a lawsuit against all the named protagonists” he said.  “No one can touch the anointed Watchmen; after all, I have lead 10’s of thousands of people to the Lord on talk radio”.satan-as-lightning

Suddenly a SONIC BOOM sounded from the throne of God, and the Third Man’s face lit up as he brightly proclaimed,  “I beheld Satan falling from heaven as lightning, proof that our prayers are answered! The Protagonists will become proto-agonistes!!!!!!!”

***************************************************************************************

Here at Starlit Gardens (which recently received a dishonorable mention in an on-air rant of the Second Man), recent events have gotten even more surreal than I ever imagined they could be. If you have read the QAlert of Steve Quayle and the two emails written by Pastor David Lankford referring to someone they term An Unreasonable Man, you may get the impression that this title/description has some cryptological depths to it.

Now Steve Quayle used the word protagonists to describe his adversaries, which he secretly would like to SLAPP around. The word protagonist refers to the chief actor in a play, as for example that great drama which is conducted at that infamous camp for Bohemians in California, featuring a Great Owl.  This owl is likened to Molech, the god of fire sacrifice, in a drama called The Cremation of Care.  Alex Jones once walked unhindered into that camp, and with a hidden camera, not surprisingly recorded the goings-on of the princes of this world.

Now believe it or not, there is a movie called An Unreasonable ManIt is a documentary on Ralph Nader, that father of consumer protection.  Steve Quayle and Pastor David Lankford have taken the phrase an unreasonable man, once said by John Little, and jumped on it as proof of his condemnation in the sight of God. Now recently, John Little has been an advocate for consumer protection, and is becoming a hero in the sight of many as he  exposed the true identity of Mike Whitestone and now that of the promoters of V-the Guerrilla Economist.

Let us examine the curse, and yes it is a Whip of Fire CURSE, spoken by Pastor David Lankford against An Unreasonable Man. Now I do not know John Little, except in the context of the candid honesty with which he discussed the Nathan Leal controversy, and now the recent revelations made on V-the Guerrilla Economist. I am not familiar with his theology, I have no idea how he makes a living, or other personal details other than that he seems to be married to a very sweet woman, and lives in Taiwan.

When Pastor David Lankford addressed an email to John Little as dear John chicken Little, I was fascinated.  Now I am known for mocking Mockers, and to find that an anointed  member of the Holy Trinity of  the Inner Circle of The Sky is Falling Radio Broadcasters is using mocking language, is well, a bolt of lightning, a purely illuminating thought.

Now we must understand that Pastor Lankford sent an email to John Little in which he signed it Sent from my IPhone.  This is a key piece of information!  We now know that Pastor David Lankford is AKA Sent from my IPhone. He accused John Little of this:  “You hid behind a key board for you are cowardice…The Bible is clear if you have ought with your brother you will go to them you don’t text them nor email them but again you hide behind a keyboard.”  In the email where he did sign it Pastor Lankford Sent from my IPhone, he reproves John chicken Little saying, “By the way Jesus did not send a text or an email people.  Christ engaged them personally which you never do because you are an apostate and hypocrite.”

Does anyone detect the hypocrisy of the protagonist Pastor David Lankford when he  messaged words of reproof using the tiny little keyboard on his IPhone?

Now really, Sent from my IPhone, did Jesus require John Little to pay for plane tickets from Taiwan to your little Koo-koo nest in America or to that Quayle nest in Montana in order to speak face to face?  Did Pastor David Lankford fly from the heights of his nest to Taiwan?  Biblical history would seem to reveal that there were no IPhones and computer keyboards 2000 years ago. Jesus could walk around Israel and talk face to face with various persons because the distances were not extensive. Unless of course he preferred Skype over texting….we could go on and on with this discussion… this strange divider of the words of God, a Scriptorian, no less, prefers texting sent from his IPhone to actual face to face contact. Hypocrite!  You are a protagonist in the theater of the absurd.

Words used to describe the Unreasonable Man include apostate, reprobate, vile, castaway, hypocrite, viper, the judge, jury and executioner, an (attacker) for no reason whatsoever, cowardice (personified), like Alexander the Coppersmith, not one in his marriage, arrogant, bigoted, self-righteous, stinking to high heaven, writing “sewage”, a deceiver, a disgrace, shipwrecked in faith, a buffoon…

What did John Little do to be so highly complimented by a Man Without Sin?  Well for one, this Man With Clean Hands thinks he is exempt from sins of Omission.  He does not like it implied that he is in anyway associated with “that vile person”  V-the Guerrilla Economist.  As I see it, another rat is trying to jump ship whenever the flag of The U. S. Code on Wire Fraud is raised on the mast. According to the Scriptorian Lankford, John Little fulfills 2 Thessalonians 3:2 in its totality.  Why is this scripture being used to bludgeon the supposed Unreasonable Man, the hero of consumer protection? It represents the return blow of vengeance of  the Commander of Camp Cryptologic, for one reason.  Do I need to say anything further?  Just who is the disgrace here?  Even if John Little is wrong in his theology, I believe that the Lord would find his advocacy on behalf of those who have been abused by the Quayle/Lankford/ Hagmann camp to be highly commendable.

Here are 3 screenshots of the emails referenced above from this article by John Little of OmegaShock:

john-little-1-2

john-little-2-2

john-little-3-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Reward of Balaam the Son of Beor’s Gift of Divination: Dwelling In A Narrow Place “Where Was No Way To Turn Either to The Right Hand Or To The Left”

I.  Ambush Journalism

Over the past 693 days, I have examined and written about the fear based messages emanating from the anointed Watchmen of the  Christian Alternative News Media’s Inner Circle.  What sparked my inquiry into the nature of this group was the article published by Douglas Hagmann and Steve Quayle on February 10, 2015 called Setting The Record Straight:  Joint Response Addressing the Character Assassinations Underway.  The removal of this article from the internet was noted on October 2, 2016 by Revelationnow.net in an article by Michael Erevna called Hagmann and Quayle Take Down Their Lies “Setting The Record Straight”.

Much of the theology which is promoted by these radio hosts represents a significant departure from the Bible, even when they directly quote the Bible. At the heart of Steve Quayle’s messages are the prophetic visions and words given to Steve from 1987 to 2014.  These words have been published at his website, stevequayle.com  in a sidebar linked here.   Perhaps it is time to ask, as Ezekiel 13:7 asks, Have ye not seen a vain vision, and have ye not spoken a lying divination, whereas ye say, The LORD  saith it:  albeit I have not spoken?

Balaam whipping his donkey because he failed to see the angel of the LORD standing with sword raised

Balaam whipping his donkey for reacting in fear to the presence of the angel of the LORD with drawn sword, who was blocking the narrow path.

On January 9, 2017,  Steve Quayle posted a QAlert which he titled, My Response To the Ambush Journalism Against Doug Hagmann, David Lankford, and SQ, Concerning V-AKA Viji Varghese- By ‘A Self Professed Unreasonable Man’-which means from the Scripture-One Who Causes Injury. 

(See screenshot below.)qalert-1-9-2017-2This QAlert is Steve Quayle’s response to John Little’s written commentary on the recent disclosure of the true identity of V-The Guerrilla Economist as Viji Varghese, whose fake identity and false credentials were promoted by Steve Quayle, Doug and Joe Hagmann, Wayne Willott AKA W-The Intelligence Insider and other Alternative Media radio hosts, to the detriment of their listeners.  Because federal criminal laws stand against such fraud, Michael Erevna of Revelationnow.net, who once was a guest on a Hagmann broadcast with V-The Guerrilla Economist, decided to publish the real identity of V on November 20, 2016.

So what excuse do Douglas Hagmann and Steve Quayle offer for promoting the false credentials of V, and then keeping silent for a number of years while Viji Varghese conned the Christian community, based on their trust of Hagmann and Quayle’s vetting of his credentials?  Now that Revelationnow.com, this blog Tracking The Leopard Meroz, and more recently, John Little of OmegaShock have been publishing the facts of this situation, all we see is a QAlert from Steve Quayle saying that the Christian Alternative Media audience should trust him, Hagmann and Lankford because they have been around for years longer than the bloggers who have reported on this fraud.  It was on that basis of trust that their listeners were conned in the first place.

Steve Quayle, how about addressing the facts and the applicable criminal penalties for the fraud which the promotion of V-the Guerrilla Economist represented, in the first place?  And now once again we hear of Pastor David Lankford stepping forward to defend these unrepentant sinners, while directing his wrath at John Little in an email.  While John Little’s name is not specifically mentioned in this QAlert, he is the main target, with the lesser targets being those other bloggers who have written on the V-the Guerrilla Economist scandal. As of  yesterday, January 12, 2017, John Little of OmegaShock has written another article entitled, SPECIAL REPORT-UPDATE-Steve Quayle and Doug Hagmann, which is linked here. If you are naïve about these anointed Watchmen, please read this update from start to finish.

Michael Erevna of Revelationnow.com was one of those in the crosshairs of the February 10, 2015 ambush journalism written by Doug Hagmann and Steve Quayle.  The other target of that article was an investigative journalist, who has since filed a lawsuit for defamation against Hagmann and Quayle. I find it ironic that Steve Quayle uses the term Ambush Journalism to defame those who dare to question the words and deeds of these self-appointed “anointed men of God”.  The truth is that Quayle knows a bit about setting up an ambush himself.

II.  The Theology of Ambush

In the following section of this post I am going to step away from the particulars of this controversy, to discuss some of the scriptures which have marked the tracks left behind by the leopard Meroz, who is a Master when it comes to setting up ambushes. This blog has in the past suggested that the language of fear based messages and the setting up of fake Insiders as a source of news within the Alternative Media is characteristic of a PSY-OP. So let us wander down that road, for discussion’s sake.

Meroz, like Balaam, is what some might call a hired gun; someone who can curse another person using spiritual bullets. Now this would seem like the way to commit the perfect crime, but in truth, it is a very dangerous method of attack, because there is a real possibility of what is called The Return Blow of the curse, coming back upon the sender.

Balaam received the rewards/wages  of divination, for both blessing and cursing. The problem for this master of the return blow  was how to overcome the words of God which demand justice.  One such scripture is Deuteronomy 27:25 which says,  Cursed be he that taketh reward to slay an innocent person. And all the people shall say Amen.

Balaam asked in Numbers 23:8, How shall I curse whom God hath not cursed?  or how shall I defy, whom the LORD hath not defied?   Because the LORD would not curse  Israel/Jacob, he then advised the King of Moab to set up a snare to entrap Israel in the sin of fornication and the worship of strange gods, so that the LORD’s hand was forced to judge Israel at Peor.

Now many genuine Christians receive threats and curses because of their witness against evil and wrongdoing. Generally, the Christian is protected, unless there is need of chastisement in their life, or they are in a situation similar to Job, where higher unseen actions between God and Satan are in play.

One of the most powerful Psalms which Christians can pray when they are in conflict with wicked men is Psalm 64. It begins, Hear my voice, O God, in my prayer:  preserve my life from fear of the enemy.  Hide me from the secret counsel of the wicked; from the insurrection of the workers of iniquity: who whet their tongue like a sword, and bend their bows to shoot their arrows, even bitter words: that they may shoot in secret at the perfect: suddenly do they shoot at him, and fear not.  They encourage themselves in an evil matter:  they commune of laying snares privily; they say, Who shall see them?  They search out iniquities; they accomplish a diligent search:  both the inward thought of every one of them, and the heart, is deep. 

But then in verse 7 of this psalm,  the world is turned upside down for these wicked men who have created ambushes for the godly. It is the most fearful aspect of the sorcerer’s prayer, that what they have prayed will come back on them as the target.  Verses 7-10 of Psalm 64 make this promise: But God shall shoot at them with an arrow; suddenly shall they be wounded.  So they shall make their own tongue to fall upon themselves:  all that see them shall flee away.  And all men shall fear, and shall declare the work of God; for they shall wisely consider of his doing.  The righteous shall be glad in the LORD, and shall trust in him; and all the upright in heart shall glory.  You can be sure that the Balaams of this world have deeply analyzed Psalm 64 in order to master the skill of avoiding the Return Blow of their own words.

The book of Jude contains deep observations on certain men crept in unawares who turn the grace of God into lasciviousness. A verse or two later, Jude mentions those angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, which presumably are the fallen angels of Genesis 6.  Steve Quayle with his GenSix Productions company, his books and his radio broadcasts has explored these stories of fallen angels and giants extensively, as well as others who are prominent in the Christian Alternative News Media.

I read extensively, and read on such subjects years ago, because it is a fascinating aspect of history on this earth. But there are warnings in the Old Testament about inquiring too deeply into dark subjects, lest one become ensnared.  Deuteronomy 11:16 warns, Take heed to yourselves, that your heart be not deceived, and ye turn aside, and serve other gods, and worship them, yet here in the Christian assemblies described by Jude, certain evil men who worship strange gods were allowed to walk freely and partake in the fellowship of the saints.

The first exhortation of Jude is to “earnestly contend for the faith”, and after describing in great detail these false Christians in the church, he gives some advice on witnessing to others in such an environment.  Jude 1:22-23  says, And of some have compassion, making a difference:  And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by flesh. Over the years I have witnessed one-on-one to many a soul, and I understand those verses in the depth of  my experiences.

One example I recall was of a person who exemplified these verses in Jude, and whose personal sin nearly caused me to be drawn into a net woven by Guile. My witness was not for nought however, as I met The Art of War by Deception with The Art of Guileless Guile. But in response to my deepest concerns, the other person who was accustomed to praying in the name of Jesus, while at the very same time rejecting the counsel of God, grew more and more angry. I am still praying that the Holy Spirit would work in the heart of this person and that they would step away from standing in the crosshairs of the judgment of God.

Often those caught in a stronghold of sin are but the victims of an ambush themselves, set up by their so-called friends, their family or their employers. We have seen what happens to the  expendable elite when the sins of their higher-ups are revealed, and those down the line of authority are chosen to be sacrificed.

Now this person whom I tried to pull from the fire would be considered an expendable elite and they identified closely with David’s prayer in Psalm 26. The first two verses are integral to this psalm, saying, Judge me, O LORD; for I have walked in mine integrity:  I have trusted also in the LORD: therefore I shall not slide.  Examine me, O LORD, and prove me; try my reins and my heart.

JUDGE ME-EXAMINE ME- PROVE ME-TRY MY REINS AND HEART. This can be a dangerous prayer if you really believe that you walk through life in your own integrity.  But if in truth you are walking in sin, it will be a great affront to your pride when the Lord sends one of his lesser servants to test your words and character. One of the marks of the selfless love of a faithful Christian witness is noted in I Corinthians 13:6 as that Charity rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth. It is a sign of a lack of love to ignore another person’s sin, especially if the Holy Spirit desires you to speak and not remain silent.

Even that false prophet Balaam, who was angry over being withstood in a narrow place, where there was no way to turn either to the right hand or to the left (Numbers 22:26), was forced to acknowledge his sin.  Numbers 22:31 says, The LORD opened the eyes of Balaam, and he saw the angel of the LORD standing in the way, and his sword drawn in his hand; and he bowed down his head, and fell flat on his face. And the angel of the LORD said unto him, Wherefore hast thou smitten thine ass these three times?  Behold, I went out to withstand thee, because thy way is perverse before me:  And the ass saw me, and turned from me these three times:  unless she had turned from me, surely now also I had slain thee, and saved her alive.

The problem with Psalm 26:1-2 being used as a prayer for one who claims to be a Christian, is a very subtle one.  The verses in the New Testament which get to the heart of this subtlety are Romans 9:31-33, which say,  But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.  Wherefore?  Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law.  For they stumbled at that stumbling stone; As it is written, Behold, I lay in Zion a stumblingstone and rock of offence: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. 

It is similar to the illustration of the differences between the prayers of the Pharisee as compared to that of the Publican. Luke 18:11 says that The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. The publican who prayed in humility, acknowledging his need for mercy was the one which God justified. The word of God is as a two-edged sword and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart (Hebrews 4:12).

Over the past several years I have noted that the Charismatic churches are increasingly promoting the concept of Watchers and Watchmen as a gift and calling of the Holy Spirit. Watchers refer to those holy angels in Daniel 4 who delivered a decree of judgment from God.   Watchmen are men who stand upon the wall of a city to warn when the enemy approaches. This Order in the Charismatic churches appears to be some sort of anointed warrior priest class, headed by a Captain.

When one examines  the NAR(New Apostolic Reformation)/Vineyard’s promotion of a concept of prayer which is called Strategic Level Spiritual Warfare (SLSW), it is observed that it represents a military style of attack against  unseen rulers of the Satanic principalities of this world, whether it be cities, states, or nations. Unity, power, strength and commanding authority are the hallmarks of this approach to prayer, versus the humility which normally accompanies the prayers of the individual.

The Cross of Lorraine aka the Patriarchal Cross: The Double Cross associated with the Knights Templar Crusaders

The Cross of Lorraine aka the Patriarchal Cross: The Double Cross associated with the Knights Templar Crusaders

That such entities are real and have rule over principalities can be found in the Bible; for example, the Prince of Persia referred to in Daniel was from the unseen spiritual realm.  And so in my conception of a fallen angel named Meroz, which I use as a motif for this blog, I point to Judges 5:23 as the emblem and source of sin of a warrior sorcerous class of priests who wield the sword of guile and ambush against the genuine Christian who is reproving works of darkness.  Judges 5:23 says, Curse ye Meroz, said the angel of the LORD, curse ye bitterly the inhabitants thereof;  because they came not to the help of the LORD, to the help of the LORD against the mighty.

Note that it was the angel of the LORD who also stood, with drawn sword, to confront Balaam, because his way was perverse.

I am a Baptist and so I was taught that my final authority is Sola Scriptura. Baptists have their inherent set of sins; legalism is but one. I first discovered the priesthood of Meroz in the Baptist churches where masculine authority is a dominant trait, and membership in fraternal lodges is common.  Baptists who pray in earnest will have some experiences which might be termed “charismatic”, but generally  they have been taught that it is wise to test the spirits.

I have noticed that many of  those who identify themselves by name or practice as Charismatic or Pentecostal, often go beyond the boundaries of the Scriptures by exalting their dreams and visions, and there is little authority in these churches to withstand their abuses.  Most false prophets who are women are given great license in the Charismatic churches. By definition, false prophets are worshippers of strange gods(Deuteronomy 13).   The Charismatic churches, as a rule,  defy the warning given in Colossians 2:18-19, Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, and not holding the Head, from which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase of God.

The danger for the Christian is to go beyond the walk of faith, and to enter into the unseen world of sorcerers who walk by sight, seeing as gods. In the occult world egregore is a common word used to represent the collective image of a group mindset.  This Greek word is also used for the Watchers. So what might be the egregore of the Watchers and Watchmen? The late David Flynn on his Watchers website displayed in his header a Pentagon, which imagery relates to the shape of the building which houses the command and control of the gods of war of our nation.

One of the egregores of America is an eagle, and as a nation we have always stood alone and above as unique in modern history, whether one considers our Christian and Freemasonic roots, our recent appearance as a world super power, our freedoms,  our economy, or our planting of the flag of Double Headed Eagle Crowned upon the moon.

The Christian Alternative News Media radio hosts have united in one common message over the past few years, and that message is that the United States of America is about to become as Babylon, fallen, fallen, fallen.  But apart from the comparison to Babylon, the sins of  America also resemble that of Esau/Edom. Within the warning of Hebrews 12:14-17, the sin of the fornication and profanity of Esau is emphasized, saying: Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:  looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled; lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.  For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected:  for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.

Fornication is a sin that does manifest itself in the flesh, but there is also spiritual fornication, the yoking of righteousness with unrighteousness. This Union of Opposing Principles can also be referred to as the Synthesis of Thesis/Antithesis. James 1:8 declares that a double minded man is unstable in all his ways. Note that the eagle which was chosen to symbolize America has a single head; whereas the ancient eagle which was chosen to represent the highest levels of Speculative Freemasonry is the Double Headed Eagle Crowned. Thus in John 19:15b we read of that strange cry of the chief priests of Israel, who were originally delivered as a nation by Jehovah, declaring We have no king but Caesar. Caesar as ruler over the Roman Empire was a double headed eagle crowned.

The George Washington Masonic National Memorial overlooking Shooter's Hill

The George Washington Masonic National Memorial overlooking Shooter’s Hill

Several years ago my husband and I visited the George Washington Masonic National Memorial in Arlington, Virginia. That strange building was modeled after the Pharos lighthouse of Alexandria and has walls so thick that it feels like being inside of a tomb.  The day we went there were few visitors, so we walked up and down the stone staircases by ourselves, peering into the various lodge rooms. Finally a bus arrived with a small group of visitors and we decided to join them in a guided tour of the upper floors which feature an outdoor over-look, a library, and a museum on the life of George Washington.  There stood a large banner displaying  Double Headed Eagle Crowned, and I looked at it in wonder. This symbol represents the higher degrees, but especially the Supreme Council 33 degree, and a formal title is given: The Supreme Council (Mother Council of the World) of the Inspector General Knights Commander of the House of the Temple of Solomon of the Thirty-third degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry of the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States of America.

House of The Temple in Washington DC-Supreme Council 33 Southern Jurisdiction

House of The Temple in Washington DC-Supreme Council 33 Southern Jurisdiction

In the world of the occult, titles and names are paramount and they have a numerical equivalent which ties them into the world of fallen angels.  Genesis 6:2 (a half sentence) says, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. The uniting of fallen angels and women produced giants, the men of renown mentioned in mythology. While Freemasonry is masculine, there is a feminine element. The egregore of the Supreme Council 33 as a double headed eagle is referred to as the Mother Council of the world. Likewise, the book of Revelation highlights a Mother of harlots, Mystery Babylon, who fornicates with the kings of the earth. Now the body of this double headed eagle is one, and this reminds me of Matthew 19:6, which says, Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh.  What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

The two heads of this eagle are watching, and held in its talons is a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the tree of life. 

Double Headed Eagle Crowned with motto Deus Meumque Jus: God and My Right

Double Headed Eagle Crowned with motto Deus Meumque Jus: God and My Right

 

The motto is Deus Meumque Jus, meaning God and My Right.  The Double Headed Eagle Crowned reveals the Sephiroth of Justice joined with the Captain of the Watchers/Watchmen.  This marriage is a union of opposing principles creating the double mind of  unsaved mankind or of counterfeit Christianity. The Captain of the Watchers has a warrior mentality;  the personification of Guile waiting in Ambush, like the man of Psalm 10.  The New Testament declares that Christ cannot be yoked with Belial, nor can Righteousness be yoked with Unrighteousness.  The body of Christ joined with the Head of Jesus Christ represents marriage at its perfection: Love, purity, and holiness without which no man shall see God.

double-headed-eagle-crowned

With him is strength and wisdom: the deceived and the deceiver are his. Job 12:16 This scripture is talking about the LORD; but the counterfeit god has these traits to a lesser degree.

This double minded eagle is portrayed in Obadiah 1:3-4, The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee,thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high; that saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground?  Though thou exalt thyself as the eagle, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith the LORD.  Another scripture which is a second witness to this declaration of God is found in Jeremiah 49:16, Thy terribleness hath deceived thee, and the pride of thine heart, O thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, that holdest the height of the hill:  though thou shouldest make thy nest as high as the eagle, I will bring thee down from thence, saith the Lord.

In conclusion, Take heed to  yourselves, that your heart be not deceived, and ye turn aside, and serve other gods, and worship them. (Deuteronomy 11:16)……. So that you might say in truth, these words from Psalm 124:6-8: 

Blessed be the LORD, who hath not given us as a prey to their teeth.  Our soul is escaped as a bird out of the snare of the fowlers:  the snare is broken, and we are escaped.  Our help is in the name of the LORD, who made heaven and earth.  

 

 

 

 

 

Where Have All The Drama Queens Gone? The March Dallas Hear The Watchmen Conference Is A Hard Act to Follow For the Knoxville Event Organizers

Mike Whitestone AKA Mike Kerr's Challenge to stay out of jail

Mike Whitestone AKA Mike Kerr once again tempting Fate

Mike Whitestone AKA Mike Kerr

Mike Whitestone AKA Mike Kerr

It would appear that many are contemplating the upcoming September 30-October 2, 2016  Hear The Watchmen Conference in Knoxville, Tennessee, as I see an upsurge in the readership of this blog’s dozen or so articles on the first conference, which took place in Dallas last March 18-20, 2016.

That first Hear The Watchmen Conference had featured 9 key speakers, Paul McGuire, L. A. Marzulli, Pastor David Lankford, Michael Boldea, Russ Dizdar, Jon Robberson, Gregg Jackson, Coach Dave Daubenmire and Pastor Flip Benham.  In addition, the emcees for the Dallas event were Doug and Joe Hagmann, John B. Wells and Sheila Zilinsky.  The names highlighted in bold print are those who are not on the roster for the Knoxville conference.

As they stood by the sullied reputation of event organizers Mike Kerr AKA Mike Whitestone and his wife Jeannie Moore/Kerr, the missing participants from the Knoxville conference displayed a loyalty unmatched in the Shakespearean-style dramas of the Merchants of Christian Alternative Media.  Also missing from the new roster of speakers is Steve Quayle, who for a short time was shown in the photo lineup of the Knoxville conference.

As befitting the short history of the Hear The Watchmen Conference,  the scripture chosen to highlight the Knoxville event is “The harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few”.  (Matthew 9:37).  Below is the roster of speakers of the September Hear The Watchmen Conference:

The Laborers in the Knoxville field

The Laborers in the Knoxville field

Last spring the first conference generated much interest due to the controversy which arose when Nathan Leal reproved the New Age heresies of Dr. Ted Broer.   As a result of listening on December 18, 2015, to that particular Hagmann/Broer interview, Nathan Leal made an attempt to deal with the heresy issues with the organizers of the Hear The Watchman Conference, as both men were scheduled to speak on the same platform. When that discussion failed,  Leal issued a letter of resignation from the conference on December 23, 2015, as a matter of conscience.

Subsequently, Dave Hodges on his Commonsense show defended Dr. Ted Broer’s version of events.  In the meantime Donna Leal had mentioned in late December that they had been threatened with a lawsuit regarding “fair use”.  I am guessing this had something to do with the audio created by Nathan Leal explaining precisely why he had disagreed so strongly with Broer’s theology.  Leal had wisely used sound bites from the radio broadcast so that the listener could hear what had been stated. By January 8, 2016, this audio had been removed from Nathan Leal’s website.

John Little of Omega Shock  defended Nathan Leal, and provided key information on the behind the scenes attacks against Leal which had resulted when he publically stated his reasons for separating from the Hear The Watchman Conference. On January 4, 2016 in response to this incident, I posted Kudos to Nathan Leal of the Watchman’s Cry for Standing Up (For a Few Days Anyway) to Dr. Ted Broer, Hagmann and Hagmann and Dave Hodges.  I was quite surprised by the high numbers of readers interested in this particular incident.  And so on January 11, 2016,  I wrote another article involving Steve Quayle and Pastor David Lankford, who were pressured to publically comment on the underlying causes of this controversy.

On January 28, 2016 I posted Cloven Tongues of Strange Fire:  The Continuing Controversy of the Hear The Watchmen Conference, and two days later on January 30th again posted another article called, The Sins of Christian Marketplace Conflicts of Interest:  or when Doug and Joe Hagmann, Did You Intend to  Release The Results of Your Background Investigation of the Founders of the Hear The Watchmen Conference?

Eight more articles ensued discussing  the shady fund-raising history of the fictitious name Mike Whitestone AKA Mike Kerr and his wife Jeannie Moore/Kerr and their GOFUNDME account, as well as Doug Hagmann and John B. Wells’ attempt to defend the duplicity of Mike Whitestone.  Other articles can be found on this blog on the speakers and persons connected with the first conference including Jon Robberson (The Hollywood Insider), Paul McGuire, Flip Benham, Sheila Zilinsky, Pastor David Lankford, Steve Quayle, Dave Hodges, and  Dave Daubenmire, who dresses in a baseball oufit, who I noted was a key defender of tax fraud Dr. Dino.

When the Dallas conference was concluded, a roster of possible participants for the Knoxville conference was shown, including a photo of Steve Quayle. Since he will not be present, I note that one of the speakers added to the current line-up is another drama queen,  Anthony Patch.  On  February 15, 2016, I wrote about his strange antics in a post called The Real Reason The Men in Black Tried to Silence Anthony Patch.

Without Douglas Hagmann, Sheila Zilinsky, and Steve Quayle to bolster the second Hear the Watchmen Conference, it would appear that this upcoming event in Knoxville, Tennessee, will be just one more dreary  conference. Perhaps Russ Dizdar might prove to be interesting, particularly as one attendee in the Spring conference who refused to clap at his speech, was ousted as a possible terrorist suspect.  I may yet examine all of Dizdar’s material in-depth, having only perused through some of his audios.  Of note is that this month someone used my email contact information, without my permission, to subscribe me to Russ Dizdar’s newsletter, notices, book discounts, and upcoming event notices.

A short summary of key events given below will remind my regular readers that the brouhaha associated with the Nathan Leal/Dr. Ted Broer controversy represented a real crisis in the inner circle of Doug Hagmann and Steve Quayle.  Nathan Leal had for some time been a featured repeat guest on the Hagmann show, but his brief stand against the heresy of another Hagmann guest represented a breach of the code of loyalty of the brotherhood of this Alternative Media universe. Into the breach jumped Dave Hodges to defend Broer. And then on January 7, 2016,  Steve Quayle and Pastor David Lankford publically commented on this situation, due to the pressure from their inquiring listener base.

John Little then defends Leal, and brings to light the unsavory actions of the conference organizer Mike Whitestone, who is trying to distance himself from critical newspaper articles written exposing his fundraising tactics under his real name Mike Kerr.  His wife’s toffee business is a sponsor of the Hagmann broadcast.  On February 20, 2016 I wrote an article called The King of Jousters, John B. Wells and his ARK Knight-errant, Sir Douglas Hagmann give a Private Exhibition of Their Prowess.  In this article as well as others, I transcribe the audio of the men defending the shady actions of their friends who partner and promote each other in the Alternative Media. On March 2, 2016 Douglas Hagmann ranted on air against bloggers who transcribe his every word.

knoxsville-hear-the-warchmen-1-2

Note the New Sensitivity to the complaints against the Event Organizers who are known for their gross commercialism of the needs of Veterans and Christians. In addition to promoting this conference, Singing Lessons are encouraged by emcee John B. Wells

Last year I asked Mike Whitestone for an accounting of his GoFundMe account and was ignored. This year he lowered his monetary goal and added that this account was set up for Jean Moore, as I had questioned the legality of using a ficticious name. I had heard that Jean Moore had married Mike Kerr and I do not know if she retained her prior surname. If not, then this is another Red Flag day for the Event Organizers who like to confuse the paper trail which those nosy IRS auditors like to sniff out.

Last year I asked Mike Whitestone for an accounting of his GoFundMe account and was ignored. This year he lowered his monetary goal and added that this account was set up for Jean Moore, as I had questioned the legality of using a ficticious name. I had heard that Jean Moore had married Mike Kerr and I do not know if she retained her prior surname. If not, then this is another Red Flag day for the Event Organizers who like to confuse the paper trail which those nosy IRS auditors like to sniff out.

Publicity of the Leal/Broer/Mike Whitestone/ Dallas Hear the Watchmen conference had gotten so far out of control that a diversion smoke grenade was tossed out on February 25, 2016 by Steve Quayle who had issued a QAlert headlined as Timothy Alberino and His Family Have Come Under A Defined and Very Dangerous Attack Wednesday Night, And, Had Not God Intervened, All Would Have Died.  Again in a post, I transcribed this very strange story, as told by Timothy Alberino and Steve Quayle to Doug Hagmann.

Then during the actual conference in Dallas on March 18-20, 2016, Douglas Hagmann claimed that he had experienced major problems with the TSA at the airport, that terrorist threats had been made against conference participants,  that he was forced to stay in the hotel and advised not to leave, and that the police had erected a 25 foot surveillance tower at the hotel, of which no one had thought to take a photo of.  And then again,  there was that man who was viewed as acting strangely because he did not applaud Russ Dizdar.  That man in the audience was removed from the conference as a possible terrorist.

sheila-zilinsky-march-2016-fb-2

As is usual with Hagmann, no police reports are provided to support his story with facts. However, after the Dallas conference, the drama continued.  I want to thank the alert reader of this blog who sent me a copy of the Vancouver Canada Provincial Adult Court docket.  We must recall that the Event Organizers and attendees claimed that the Dallas conference was anointed by God and a great success.  But within 3 days of the conclusion of this God anointed event,  one of the emcees, referred to by Mike Whitestone as a Warrior Woman for Jesus, ended up on March 23, 2016 with charges being brought against her for assault, uttering threats to cause death or bodily harm, causing disturbance, mischief-obstruction/use/enjoyment of property in Vancouver, Canada.

The British Columbia court system, file number 241656 shows as the cause claimed for these actions to be fear of injury/damage by another person.  Screenshots of this event are shown below, taken from the public records of the Vancouver Provincial Adult Court:

zilinsky-arrest-2-2

zilinsky-arrest-3-2

zilinsky-arrest-2

As the title of this post suggests, indeed the Dallas Hear The Watchmen Conference will be a hard act to follow by those participating in this month’s Knoxville event.

 

 

 

“Steve Quayle is Pumping My Fiction Like It’s A Fact” claims Author Peter Demmon

Author Peter Demmon who has a website promoting his fictional writing, The Lost Book of King Og- The Only Written Words of the Rephaim -(copyright 2016 by DEMMON) has recently posted an article concerning Steve Quayle’s use of his writings.

As a summer reading exercise, you may wish to peruse the links he provides over at reddit.com. I am taking it a bit easy this summer, so I am not providing any commentary on this issue.  Feel free to make any comments here or at the reddit.com website.

Update:  6/2/2016 The Gonteekwa twitter

A City Boy’s Nightmare: A Little League Team of Snakes

I was browsing through a large number of internet comments on the Nathan Leal/Ted Broer story last night.  Almost all of the commenters had enjoyed Nathan Leal’s past interviews on the Hagmann and Hagmann radio show.  Almost all were polite, sincere, thoughtful in their use of the Scriptures, and desirous of Christian reconciliation and repentance.

One person had noted that Donna Leal had said in late December that they had been threatened with a lawsuit over  “fair use” . In general, Fair Use has to do with the rules which define the use of copyrighted material for commentary purposes. In such situations it is not legally required to ask the copyright holder for specific written permission, but the source must be properly credited.  An example of this is the case of Nathan Leal’s audio, where he critiqued Dr. Ted Broer’s words on the Dave Hodges’ Commonsense Show and on the Hagmann Report.  Portions of actual audio clips were played so that his listeners could understand what was really said, and the tone of the discourse.

All main stream and alternative media news and commentary sites make frequent use of the Fair Use rules,  in order to flesh out their articles.  Both the Hagmann Report and The Common Sense Show also highly depend on Fair Use privileges, so it is a wonder that any legal threat against Leal would involve this particular issue.

Two other commenters in the Nathan Leal discussion made mention of Steve Quayle’s January 29th post in his Dreams and Visions section of his website.  This involved a dream of snakes, which Pastor David Lankford had related to him.  Having lived in Texas and Mississippi since 1983, I have seen many snakes in my yard; most were harmless, some were six footers with a body having an eight inch circumference, some were pit vipers, rattlers, or coral snakes. In a few instances, my husband was forced to kill a snake for safety’s sake, by directing a sharp shovel downward to cut off its head. Once or twice we had a snake in the house,  because one of our kittens had carried it inside to proudly show it to us.  After reading the dream below, my guess is that we are dealing with a City Slicker who had a nightmare.

david lankford dream jan 2016 snakes (2)It was interesting to me that a number of the polite supporters of Nathan Leal  thought that Lankford and Quayle’s  negative use of the term “snakes” was meant as a reference to them. Lankford says initially that these snakes were friendly to them,  so that “you can even pet them”. Many of these Leal supporters had been regular listeners of the Hagmann Report, until the Leal/Broer controversy forced them to take sides.

Lankford says that these snakes were all the same, but different sizes.  This he interprets to  mean that the snakes were the same, but had “different platforms”.  He tells Quayle that “we were going to kill them”.  Different platforms?  You mean that some made comments via the chat rooms of Blog Talk or You Tube, or via forums or blogs?  I gave a sigh of relief when Lankford had said that some were friendly to them-that would certainly rule me out as a target of this dream.  Then he infers that these snakes, which were in the House of the body of Christ, were playing on Little League Teams and causing a mess.  And Steve Quayle thought that this strange quagmire of anxieties was something that needed to be shared with millions of people?

According to Lankford this mess is about to come to an end soon, through the use of ammunition of a lesser caliber, once he is done preaching on Jonah. Steve Quayle has the last word as always.  He warns,  APPLY THIS TO LATEST ATTACK ON DAVID AND I- TAKE IT TO THE LORD IN PRAYER! “SLANDER TO THE HEART” IS WHAT A BULLET TO THE HEAD IS LIKE- YOU CAN’T RECALL YOUR BULLET (SLANDER) ONCE THE HAMMER DROPS!  This comment by Quayle is not part of the dream (we hope).

So what was the latest attack prior to this particular dream?  Was it John Little discussing Nathan Leal’s experience with the Hear the Watchmen conference?  Was it Tracking the Leopard Meroz, who the day of the dream posted Cloven Tongues of Strange Fire:  The Continuing Controversy of The Hear the Watchmen Conference, which made mention of both Steve Quayle and Pastor David Lankford?  Was it someone who had sent them an email, asking them to repent?

Let us finish this post with a link to Rebel Planet Dispatch’s Marcel Cousineau, who wrote an excellent commentary on January 30, 2016 called Simple Biblical Insight Into David Lankford’s Dream.  This post displays interesting insights, and is written with a heart of brotherly love. I hope that no one would classify Cousineau as a snake in the house of the Lord, deserving of gunfire from those anointed Watchmen, Lankford and Quayle. Maybe we should all just slither away, as the low caliber bullets start to bounce off the walls.

Cloven Tongues of Strange Fire: The Continuing Controversy of The Hear The Watchmen Conference

Who have said, With our tongue will we prevail; our lips are our own:  who is lord over us?  Psalm 12:4

PREFACE:  The book of Acts 2:1-11 makes it clear that on the day of Pentecost, when those in one accord who were filled with the Holy Ghost  “began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance”, they were not speaking gibberish, but in known languages. If you are unfamiliar with the whole body of scriptures which deal with speaking in tongues; one discussion can be found at the berean research institute.com site linked here. It is interesting that the divisiveness of the tongues issue is commented on, in the first hour of the Hagmann Report which had aired on January 6, 2016 entitled Fear of the Lord is absent in the land. A transcription of this first hour can be found in my January 11, 2016 post, if you desire to examine the context in which I extract the following observations.

ON JANUARY 6th, STEVE QUAYLE voiced his opinion as to the underlying reason why the Nathan Leal/Dr. Ted Broer controversy had resulted in division within the Hear the Watchmen conference scheduled for Dallas in March of 2016.  He says, “This whole thing went wrong because a, a, a, how do I say this, you can be sincere and sincerely wrong.  But a well meaning couple wanted to have a conference similar to Whitestone.  Now since I was involved in Whitestone and Pastor Lankford was there and many people are listening, I will share with you why Whitestone worked.  Because the men who came there were in agreement.  They were in agreement, number one, in the Holy Ghost, and everybody who was a speaker was baptized in the Holy Spirit.  It wouldn’t have done good to put me and some ah Baptist minister,  I’m not taking away from the Baptist minister, who speaks that that speaking in tongues is of the devil, together.  But we have a united purpose.”

A paragraph later Quayle adds, “…but it was duplicated wrong.  Of all the people that could have asked me, could have saved themselves, spared this whole thing and I’m not saying, I have all the answers.  But I am saying, I didn’t have this answer.  The need did not constitute the call.  And by the way I have basically shared everything I’m sharing publicly with the individual ah ah in an email, and his attitude was one of humility and repentance, OK?”

Some of what Mr. Quayle says is not clear to the casual listeners of this Hagmann Report, because he does not precisely identify the persons he is referring to.  But he described the Whitestone Remnant Conference as successful because the sponsors and speakers were united; whereas the upcoming conference of Hear the Watchmen appears to have had a hidden element of division, which unfortunately became apparent when one speaker publically reproved another speaker.  Thus in hindsight, it would appear that the conference founders were lacking in discernment when they selected their original speakers’ line up, because unity in the Holy Spirit was not present.

Amos 3:3 asks the rhetorical question, Can two walk together, except they be agreed?  Now what is interesting in this discussion of unity, is that Steve Quayle and Pastor David Lankford, who always present a united front, represent two different viewpoints in this matter of what constitutes walking in agreement with other professing Christians.  

In this same radio broadcast, just minutes before Steve Quayle speaks,  Pastor David Lankford says this:  “Marvin Rosenthal is a good friend of mine.  We were coming back from Israel and we were sitting on the tour bus going back to the airport.  He looked at me and said, David, let me ask you a question. What is your affiliation as far as denomination?  I said, well brother Rosenthal, I am a Pentecostal.  He looked at me and smiled real big and he said, That’s why I’m very careful now how I pick my fights.  Because I support the ___?( Note, I could not discern the word here, when I transcribed the audio) mission work in Israel.  He’s a good Baptist brother.  He doesn’t believe in talking in tongues but I do.  But you see I can work with that man and because the man happens to have wisdom to say you know what?  this man helping me do mission work in Israel, though we disagree with this little doctrinal thing we’re not going to fall out over it.  And this is what happens.”

So while Pastor Lankford is able to walk in agreement with someone who does not speak in tongues, Steve Quayle illustrates one of his points on the subject of unity by emphasizing that  he could not walk in agreement with a Baptist minister who thought tongues are of the devil. (Now there is an interesting difference of opinion, waiting for just the right opportunity to split the foundation of Unity wide open, if I ever saw one.)

As a Baptist who has witnessed two egregious church splits, I know how a little crack in the foundation stone can become a great divide.  The Song of Moses in Deuteronomy 32, describes many examples of division and was written “that this song may be a witness for me against the children of Israel” (Dt. 31:19). One rock split is noted in verses 4 & 5, “He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment:  A God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he.  They have corrupted themselves, their spot is not the spot of his children:  they are a perverse and crooked generation.”

The original speakers list of the Hear the Watchman Conference, has been modified to remove the names of Nathan Leal, Dr. Ted Broer and Sharon Broer.  Currently, Russ Dizdar, Michael Boldea, Jr., Josh Tolley, and Sheila Zilinsky have been added to the roster.  Presumably, Unity has been restored, right? They are all walking in one accord, and speaking with the tongues of fire of the Holy Spirit, right?  There is no possibility that strange fire has been used to burn the incense which now ascends from the golden altar of their prayers, right?

So why are we discovering another split in the foundation of this conference? In this continuation of the Nathan Leal/ Dr. Ted Broer controversy, we find an article was written January 15, 2016 by John Little of Omega Shock entitled Sin in the Church.  He begins with a lament for the sin he has witnessed in American churches, and then proceeds to comment on what he observed when he first heard about the Leal/Broer controversy. Some of John Little’s comments which I have excerpted are as follows:

“Unfortunately that experience leads me to the belief that we are allowing Nathan Leal to be unfairly brutalized.  And yes, I really do mean ‘brutalized’.  To be fair to those that are doing the ‘brutalizing’, I doubt that they were given the whole picture.  Their anger and wrath were inflamed by weak Christians, and a man who has engaged in heresy and deception.  That man of heresy and deception is Ted Broer.  I only name names when the evidence is incontrovertible.  I’ve had misgivings about Ted from the first day that I heard him speak.  But, my operational area was different from his, so I left it to others to deal with.  Unfortunately, I was requiring Nathan to deal with this-and take the heat.…”

“Ted Broer has chosen to be in the limelight and has also chosen to preach heresy, and then lie about it.  His sin is obvious and clear.  Withholding his name would be a sin on my part. Here are the sins and heresies that I have observed:  Ted Broer made claims about Nathan Leal that were not true.  Nathan came to Ted in peace and concern, and Ted responded with anger and retribution.  Nathan’s concerns were valid and correct.  Ted lied.  Furthermore, my suspicion is that Ted has engaged in a whispering campaign in an attempt to impugn Nathan’s reputation…..It is impossible for there to be so much smoke, without a fire.”

John Little describes why he considers Ted Broer’s statements on The Hagmann Report to be heresy.  He then goes on to say, “People were upset with Nathan Leal because his exposure of those lies has put the conference in Dallas in question”.  And then John Little makes some suggestions about how the people contributing to this situation might make amends.

On January 22, 2016, John Little wrote another article entitled Love of the Truth and Cognitive Dissonance.  At the end of the main body of his commentary, he provides an update on the Nathan Leal controversy to those who had made further inquiries to him.  Some of the interesting excerpts of his statements are as follows:  “Nathan Leal is NOT GUILTY of ANY of the charges leveled against him. Up until this past week, I had been thinking that the largest part of the guilt fell upon the shoulders of Ted Broer.  To my dismay, I have found that this in not the case.  And yes, the proper word is DISMAY.  I am incredibly grieved that there is another name that is at the heart of this.  This person lies within the organization bringing about the HearTheWatchmen conference in Dallas, March 18-20, 2016.”

“I do not believe that the speakers at this conference understand the true nature of this person.  If they did, I do not think that they would have signed up to be a part of it.  Unfortunately for him, some of those speakers are beginning to find out and have been threatened by him.  You will notice that three people have disappeared from the original roster of speakers.  I believe that you can do the math.  Let me be clear that I would not have known about this person, unless he had publicly attacked me, making false claims. When he did that, I began to see a deeper corruption at work.  And then, some of you stepped forward – privately and publicly –  with important information.  I am very upset by what I have uncovered.

“….Well, there’s worse than Ted Broer.….Allow me to also leave a message to the person at the heart of all this:  Do not threaten me with a lawsuit.  I will go public with any and all communication that you and your representatives make with me.  If the person at the heart of this case, repents and resigns, I will do my best to soften the blow.  I do not wish anyone to feel hurt, not even those who are guilty.  But, I love the truth, and I will tell the truth.

If you are interested in following this controversy, it is important that you read the above two links to John Little’s articles, so as to understand the entire context of his commentary on this issue.  I have excerpted parts which I found interesting, but Little’s entire posts display his theological analysis of this particular situation. In general, I agree with most of his observations; however, Nathan Leal is a problem unto himself when it comes to his dreams and prophecies and his long-time association with the Hagmanns. Even if this current rift which has come to the surface were to be cemented over, there still remain the cracks in the foundations of the underlying  Charismatic theology, which represent departures from the Scriptures as a whole.

What many people have discovered when they attempt to discuss such matters with some of these Christian Alternative Media stars, is that they are blocked, censored and threatened.  This particular Leal/Broer controversy is just one such example.   While I give Leal credit for bringing this matter to light, he quietly stepped back into the darkness after a very short time in the public view. His articles on who are the real Watchmen are not pointed enough, given that he had been in the Inner Circle of Trust of the Hagmanns, as a repeat guest over a long period of time, and had been a silent partaker in their sins as Watchmen who claim they were anointed of God.   To my knowledge, I have never heard Leal speak out on  behalf of  those other Christians who were publicly reviled for speaking the truth about the actions of  The Inner Circle of Trust.

UPDATE 1/29/2016 John Little at Omega Shock has written a new post called My Report on Nathan Leal