Jacquelyn Weaver, Author of Tracking the Leopard Meroz, Responds to Jason Goodman’s False Accusations of a Co-Conspiracy

On March 15, 2019, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division docket for Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman posted Document 79, 79-1, and 79-2 as the Declaration of Jacquelyn Weaver with two Exhibits.

These documents represent Jacquelyn Weaver’s response to Jason Goodman’s allegations in Document 78 that he is being harassed by a campaign of co-conspirators who have committed felony crimes in conjunction with the Plaintiff, Robert David Steele and  Intervenor Applicant, D. George Sweigert.

Document 78 Defendant’s Opposition to the Motion to Intervene filed 3/8/2019 describes the conspiracy   rds doc 78   (If you want to read Document 78 including the exhibits, the entire documents are posted here.)

The following documents represent Jacquelyn Weaver’s response to Document 78 allegations:

Document 79 Declaration of Jacquelyn Weaver   rds doc 79 3 15 2019

Document 79-1  Exhibit A  rds doc 79-1 3 15 2019

Document 79-2  Exhibit B  rds doc 79-2 3 15 2019

Just One or Two Observations on this David Hawkins/Jason Goodman Scheme


I had a few minutes in a busy day to take a quick look at the chat room comments on today’s Jason Goodman’s video, Was Sweigert the EVL BAT CAVE Custodian or Key Holder for BAE  Bit-Spread Pentagon Bomb.

In this first screenshot shown above, Joe Napoli commented:  “Wonder if my innocent comments will be screen shotted and posted on chase the leopard Meroz?!! (5 teethy smile faces).

Sure, why not, Joe.  Maybe one day you will demonstrate to us just how innocent your comments really are. 

Another Screenshot of Jason Goodman complaining about spoliation of evidence

Hmmm, I see in the comment below that Jason Goodman was complaining that, “he is attempting to SPOLIATE evidence of harassment (sp)”.  Who is “he”, by the way?But speaking of spoliating evidence, hey David Hawkins, did you catch Kevin Alan Marsden’s YouTube channel today?  It is called, Agent Serco reveals the real David Hawkins.  Marsden reviews the research he has done on your employment and education background, including information received from someone who formerly worked with you. It seems you have tampered with your own history.

However, my favorite part of this video expose was the conclusion.  At the 17.58 mark, Kevin Marsden speaks directly to David Hawkins, saying, “so you did your degree in two years; no, you didn’t.  I have an MA.  No you haven’t.  I went to Oxford.  No, you didn’t.  These are all fictitious embellishments to make yourself something you’re not.” (18.15)

He continues, (18.52) … “evidence is there now.  I’m starting to find even more footprints and yet you have the audacity to turn around and say, well, yes the, the communications are this and this and this without expert knowledge in any of it.  You’ve accused people of the worst crimes in the world with no evidence, no fact-based thing….(19.38) absolutely despicable…”.

Oh no, look at this screenshot!  Michael Barden is making a threat!  Why wasn’t he blocked?  Oh yeah, he is a source of income as a frequent guest on CSTT.

Michael Barden, who identifies himself as a Targeted Individual, left a threat in the chat room of Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource the Truth, saying  “Some day I’m going to have the chance to look Sweigert in the eye.  He’s going to be held responsible for his domestic terrorism.”

What domestic terrorism?  You mean the false accusations of David Hawkins and Jason Goodman?  Recall that Michael Barden  was arrested for “aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and disorderly conduct with a weapon”. 

This type of threat needs to be taken seriously, and I hope someone filed a police report on that statement. 

Last screenshot showing today’s advertising of how to pay both David Hawkins and Jason Goodman if you want to partake in the continuance of their false accusations. 

You know, this reminds me of a situation that I addressed back in 2016 about another YouTube Alt Media channel. I reminded my readers that 941.18 U. S. C. on the elements of wire fraud includes (1) a scheme to defraud by means of false pretenses, and (2) the defendant’s knowing and willful participation in scheme with intent to defraud, and (3) the use of interstate wire communication to further the scheme (example: the internet).

942 “The Scheme and Artifice to Defraud”, is according to a Department of Justice memo, “to be measured by nontechnical standards and is not restricted by any common-law definition of false pretenses.  “[T]he words to defraud … have the ‘common understanding’ of “wrongdoing one in his property rights by dishonest methods or schemes,” and “usually signify the deprivation of something of value by trick, chicane, or overreaching.”

So let’s see: knowingly creating false credentials for the purposes of false accusation and defamation and asking for money on the internet…wire fraud…and oh, that nasty little terroristic threat…all in a day’s work for Crowdsource the Truth and Reverse Engineering CSI.