DR. STRANGELAW or How I Learned to Strategically Avoid Authenticating the Evidence and Became an Intergalactic Protected Witness

On January 23, 2019, CNet.com headlined a Claire Reilly article declaring John McAfee has recruited ‘hundreds’ of masked look-alikes for his 2020 presidential bid: Why?  Because he’s on a boat on the run from the IRS.

It is not the first time that John McAfee has been on the run.  Back in 2012, McAfee fled Belize when he became a person of interest regarding the murder of his neighbor. This time McAfee is not fleeing TO the United States; he is fleeing from the long reach of the Department of Justice.

Robert David Steele: The truth at any cost lowers all other costs

 

Ho hum, another rich, spoiled, hedonist running from the IRS. Who cares?

Answer:  Robert David Steele, the former CIA spy.

So on June 10, 2019, John McAfee displayed on Twitter this screenshot of a message from Robert David Steele to McAfee’s internet handle Johnny Bgood.

 

As we have noted before, Robert David Steele is under strict IRS guidelines that he cannot use his non-profit corporation Earth Intelligence Network  to influence the outcome of Presidential elections. So Steele cautiously framed his message as an EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE recommendation when he advised Presidential hopeful McAfee to, “Burn his ass, take photos, I will post them…”

Steele’s relationship with McAfee involves a shared vision of a World Brain, which was advertised as a project back in 2017 during the #UNRIG election reform campaign.

phibetaiota.com

Yahoo Finance’s Samantha Chang stated in her June 9, 2019 article, Bitcoin Bull John McAfee Warns U. S. Government:  ‘I Will Bury You’, that “In a dizzying weekend Twitter rant, McAfee claimed that the Department of Justice is compiling a bogus case against him for money-laundering, racketeering, and murder.” This situation has lead McAfee to warn, “I’ve collected files on corruption in governments.  For the first time, I’m naming names and specifics.  I’ll begin with a corrupt CIA agent and two Bahamian officials…If I’m arrested or disappear, 31+ terabytes of incriminating data will be released to the press.”

The Question which we breathlessly await an Answer for is…

Will John McAfee provide proper authentication of his evidence, or will the public be subjected to another dreary round of dubious accusations against government officials, which are then spread over the internet by YouTube wannabe broadcast journalists? 

McAfee’s friend, Robert David Steele, has no problem relying on the “U. S. government is corrupt to the bone” federal court system, when it serves his own interests. However, John McAfee’s present troubles may require an Intergalactic Get Out of Jail Free Card, allowing him to escape on a NASA rocket to a secret colony that Steele claims exists  on planet Mars.

In this twilight zone scenario, perhaps Dr. Strangelaw’s Witness Protection Program can be of assistance.  All McAfee needs to do is to declare that he is being persecuted by the Deep State because of his knowledge of child sex trafficking.

Witness Protection appears to be one of the many interests of non-attorney Robert David Steele, who in the photo below, is shown in his black robe as Chief Counsel for that sovereign citizen-styled LARP Court, called the International Tribunal for Natural Justice (ITNJ).

The ITNJ is a pretend court which has NO AUTHORITY on earth to prosecute civil or criminal complaints; yet it claims to provide witness protection to persons whose testimony lacks the proper evidence to support their defamatory accusations of pedophilia and child sex trafficking.

Such witness testimonies given to ITNJ are not scrutinized using the standard rules of evidence in regard to hearsay, authentication of documentation, cross-examination of witnesses, etc. which our American court system employs to ensure a just verdict.

A cursory look at one of ITNJ’s Protected Witnesses:  Timothy Charles Holmseth

Timothy Holmseth of Minnesota has a ten year history of reporting on stories involving missing children. Attorney Steven S. Biss in a federal civil complaint filed on behalf of Holmseth in 2018, explained, “In or about April 2009, when he was first contacted by Cobra Staubs-Picazio’s private investigator-Holmseth operated a website.  Holmseth was known for his investigative journalism.  Cobra told Holmseth that Picazio needed some independent news coverage about a missing child that had been kidnapped named HaLeigh Cummings.”

Subsequently Holmseth became involved in conducting “over one-hundred hours of interviews with witnesses, law enforcement, lawyers, social services and others” and he now claims that he “obtained highly sensitive information regarding the activities of satanic organized crime in Florida.” [see timothy holmseth biss complaint]

Because of his involvement in investigating elements of the HaLeigh Cummings story, Holmseth and others associated with that story became entangled in a lengthy  exchange of defamatory accusations against each other on the internet.  Those accusations created a cloud of distraction over the real story of a missing child.

It is nearly impossible for the outside observer to disentangle that whole mess, thus in this article I am going to stay within the bounds of several court cases involving Holmseth, which are listed below in this PACER case locator.

The First Minnesota lawsuit

On July 22, 2014 (case 2970) Holmseth vs the City of East Grand Forks was filed in the Minnesota District Court. Document 107, representing a Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, [timothy holmseth 3 9 2015 doc 107] provides the following background on this case:

“This 42 U. S. C. section 1983 case arises from three separate courses of events.  The first course of events concerns the actions of the East Grand Forks Police Department (“EGFPD”) while investigating complaints made about Timothy Holmseth (“Plaintiff”) between 2009 and 2011 regarding postings he was publishing to the internet that ultimately resulted in a protective order being issued against Plaintiff in Florida.”

“The second course of events concerns the actions of members of the EGFPD, members of the Polk County Sheriff’s Department, and two attorneys during the 2011 and 2012 investigation and prosecution of Plaintiff for violations of the Florida protective order.”

“The third course of events concerns a staff member of the East Grand Forks Economic Development and Housing Authority (“EDHA”) being ordered to shred an address verification form required for Plaintiff to obtain security clearance to work for a company providing janitorial services to the National Weather Service (“NWS”), and complaints made about Plaintiff while so employed that ultimately resulted in his employment being terminated on July 11, 2014.”

In this 62 page document, U. S. Magistrate Judge Leo L. Brisbois on March 5, 2015 recommended that each of the Defendant’s separate Motions to Dismiss be granted, and the Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief be denied.

Why did this lawsuit prove to be a waste of time?

One of the points explained by the Magistrate stated, “As discussed above, “[w]hile a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations, a plaintiff’s obligation to provide the grounds of his entitlement to relief requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of cause of action will not do.”  Bell Atl. Corp v. Twombly, 550 U. S. 544, 555 (2007) (internal quotations and citations omitted).  “A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged,” but in contrast, “[w]here a complaint pleads facts that are ‘merely consistent with’ a defendant’s liability, it ‘stops short of the line between possibility and plausibility of ‘entitlement to relief.'”…”

This case [2970] was closed on July 23, 2015.

The Second Minnesota lawsuit

A year later, on July 25, 2016, Holmseth vs. City of Grand Forks, et. al. [case 2496] was filed in the Minnesota District Court. On August 25, 2016, Chief Judge United States District Court John R. Tunheim gave an Order Adopting Report and Recommendations,stating, “Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo. I. Brisbois, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-entitled matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: (1) This action is summarily dismissed without prejudice.  and (2) Plaintiff Timothy Charles Holmseth’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, [docket No. 2], is denied as moot.”

The North Dakota lawsuit

A week prior to the above Order in the Minnesota case, on August 18, 2016, Timothy Holmseth filed another lawsuit against the City of Grand Forks/Grand Forks Police Department, et. al. in the North Dakota District Court. That case was closed on October 3, 2016, after United States Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal filed an Order as Document 6 on September 30, 2016. [see timothy holmseth north dakota 2016 order]

In that Order, it states that “Plaintiff Timothy Charles Holmseth (Holmseth), who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint and motion for emergency injunctive relief. (Doc. #4).  Holmseth alleges the various defendants have engaged in a criminal conspiracy to destroy and conceal evidence of misconduct.”

“The complaint describes Holmseth as a ‘journalist, author, publisher, songwriter, and media specialist’…The defendants are various law enforcement agencies, a health care provider, a state university, the State of North Dakota, a state’s attorney, and local government agencies.  The allegations of the complaint concern Holmseth’s attempt to obtain information about a February 2015 event, in which a person was allegedly shot by a police-officer.”

Of interest in that Order (Document 6) is the Judge’s discussion of a legal argument against Holmseth’s complaints.  On page 6, it says, “There is no general constitutional right of access to government information.  As described by the United States Supreme Court: There is no constitutional right to have access to particular government information, or to require openness from the bureaucracy…The public’s interest in knowing about its government is protected by the guarantee of a Free Press, but the protection is indirect.  The Constitution itself is neither a Freedom of Information Act nor an Official Secrets Act.”  It is then added later, “The First Amendment guarantees a right to publish information, but not necessarily a right to gain information.”

The Judge dismissed without prejudice the Plaintiff’s claims and denied his motion for injunctive relief.  Finally, “The court finds that any appeal would be frivolous, could not be taken in good faith, and may not be taken in forma pauperis.”

The Sarah Westall video discussing the arrest of Holmseth for an alleged violation of Picazio’s Florida Protective Order

On February 24, 2018, Sarah Westall published a YouTube video, Timothy Holmseth Update-Serious Findings Disclosed, as a response to Holmseth’s February 17, 2018 arrest. At the .19 mark, Westall states, “…he was let out without bail and they, they didn’t prosecute him further.  He had a phone call from the International Judicial Commission.  He’s an official witness now on their list looking into child trafficking and sex crimes against children and an official representative called the jail on his behalf and shared with him that he is a witness for them and that helped move the case along.  The judge didn’t see an issue…”.

Let me see if I can get this straight.  Timothy Holmseth gets arrested, and a LARP Chief Counsel with a LARP Court that has no authority on earth to judge or prosecute criminal or civil offenses, intervenes in a law enforcement process that is officially authorized in the state of Florida.

The above screen shot of Robert David Steele’s comment under Sarah Westall’s video states, “Mr. Tim Holmseth is a registered witness per a protective order from the Judicial Commission of inquiry into Human Trafficking and Child Sex Abuse under Presiding Judge Sir John Walsh of Brannaugh.”

“The death threats against Mr. Holmseth are being taken very seriously.  Polk County law enforcement is now fully briefed-they will not be fooled again, and any further attempts against Mr. Holmeth –both procedural and violent– will be elevated immediately to the federal level.”

“If it is not obvious to these criminals, their former CIA and FBI cohorts are now under sealed indictments and will be of no use to them.  The White Hats helped our President harvest the NSA database and we have it all.  It’s time for the criminals to think about exit strategies–emigration to Israel is certainly one option.  I continue to strongly favor a Truth & Reconciliation strategy– our focus is educational, not punitive.”

Confirmation of Holmseth’s Protected Witness Status with ITNJ

A week later, on Timothy Holmseth’s website, writeinaction.com, he reports that he has been “confirmed as a witness to testify before the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Human Trafficking and Child Sex Abuse in London in April, 2018…Holmseth was introduced to the Commission by Robert David Steele, Chief Enabling Officer of Earth Intelligence Network.  Steele was recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize and is a former Operations Officer in the Clandestine Service of the CIA.  Steele is the co-founder of the Marine Corps Intelligence Activity.  In December, 2017, the 9th Minnesota District Court vacated prior orders against Holmseth after receiving documents and audio that revealed Holmseth had obtained information regarding child trafficking, child pornography, and fake adoptions by figures in Broward County, Florida, working with the CIA and FBI.  For more information on Holmseth with the International Tribunal for Natural Justice visit (link given).

Curiously, that link goes to a page that has since been removed from the ITNJ website. 

Not Another Lawsuit!!! 

On February 3, 2018, two weeks BEFORE his arrest, Timothy Holmseth was declaring the following message on his other website haleighcummingsdotme.wordpress.com #PEDOGATE DEVELOPING

High level strategists associated with U. S. Intelligence??  Subsequent to that Timothy Holmseth write-up, a federal civil lawsuit was filed on May 25, 2018, in the Virginia Eastern District Court, by Robert David Steele’s attorney Steven S. Biss, as counsel for Timothy Holmseth.  [timothy holmseth biss complaint]

This case was later transferred from Virginia to the Florida Southern District Court on January 2, 2019.

But then an interesting thing happened.  On January 31, 2019 United States District Judge William P. Dimitrouleas issued Document 35, Order of Dismissal for Failure to Comply with Court Orders.

The Order reads, “THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Court’s January 23, 2019 Order to Show Cause to Plaintiff’s Counsel for Failure to Comply with Order Requiring Status Report…The Court warned that “[a] failure to comply with this Order to Show Cause shall result in the immediate dismissal of this case.”  As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff’s counsel has failed to comply with the Court’s Orders.  Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1.  the above-styled action is DISMISSED for failure to comply with multiple Court Orders. 2.  the Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT any pending motions….”.

So what happened to the federal lawsuit #PEDOGATE that Counsel of record Steven Scott Biss was developing with high level strategists associated with U. S. Intelligence?

What kind of attorney fails to represent the interests of his client by ignoring multiple Court Orders so that the case is dismissed?

Under the Comment Section of  the Sarah Westall video, Steele receives blowback 

There are a number of interesting conversations posted under the Sarah Westall video noted earlier in this post. Attorney Kim Picazio responded in length to misinformation presented by Steele and Westall.

In addition,   Phil C. in responding to a previous comment, said “Kathleen St. Clare I wish I could but would prefer not to be the target of the next lawsuit.  I can say this, There are not 17 thumbs up on my comment for no reason Steven S. Biss.”

Robert Steele then commented, suggesting, “It is good to be afraid of a federal lawsuit.” (and he gives the link to Google Gestapo, and that article can be read here.)

[Also see Tracking the Leopard Meroz article November 12, 2017, Robert David Steele & His List of Crowdstalkers & Co-Conspirators:  Is Your Name On This List?]

Then  LjRoxArk asked, “Robert…are you seriously threatening “phil c”??  that’s exactly why folk do NOT want you anywhere NEAR a real investigation.  Go find something else to make some cash doing..write books..but stay OUT of our house..you could be renamed ->>>”forked tongue bobby”..do you see how many peeps here think poorly of you, and that you are a tool for the deep state looking to vector the narrative.  we don’t want what ya got.  go sell it somewhere else.  You can threaten me all you want. I own nothing and never will, also quite ill..suit proof.. and how dare you threaten someone on this channel or any other legitimate truther channel for their opinions…”.

Veering Off Course

It appeared to have begun well when Timothy Holmseth first began investigating the story of the missing Florida child, Haleigh Cummings.  On July 13, 2009 he submitted a 22 page Preliminary Investigative Report to the FBI, which was presented as an Exhibit of the Biss lawsuit, Holmseth vs. Picazio, et. al. [timothy holmseth biss complaint].

But as time went on, it appears that Holmseth veered off into child trafficking conspiracy theories based on speculations about the facts of the HaLeigh Cummings case, and that led to publishing unfounded accusations.   It is interesting that Holmseth’s  conspiracy theories also involved the murder of Jon Benet Ramsey, in much the same way that David Hawkins on Crowdsource the Truth has woven that same motif into his CSI storyboards.  As an example of this similarity in approach, Abel Danger in a January 4, 2019 post on a Timothy Holmseth video, also featured a Bad Santa Boystown image similar to the type of collages created by Jason Goodman and David Hawkins on Crowdsource the Truth that were employed to defame certain individuals.

Bad Santa Boystown– Abel Danger 1/4/2019 post on Holmseth video on Pence

Timothy Holmseth vs. Kim Picazio, William Murtaugh and Karen Gaur

The Introduction to the May 25, 2018 lawsuit prepared by Steven Biss begins, “America’s darkest secret is pedophilia and child trafficking.  Journalists, like Timothy Holmseth – who seek to expose the perpetrators, uncover the truth, work with the FBI and facilitate criminal prosecutions- are subject to death threats, threats to kidnap and rape family members, mutilation, tortious interference with business and employment, blackmail, extortion, vandalism, intimidation, and malicious and unrelenting ad hominem attacks.  Often, as in this case, the perpetrators employ a technique called “gaslighting” – they, inter alia, defame the investigator by accusing him of heinous acts and crimes they themselves have committed.”

This is pretty wild stuff being described in a lawsuit.  But what was really wild was that attorney Steven Biss effectively abandoned this case,  once it was transferred from Virginia to Florida. 

But Attorney Biss was not the only one who was withering on the vine.  Timothy Holmseth’s professional writing skills seem to have greatly diminished as well. An example of this phenomena is the January 23, 2016, self-published  $9.99 Kindle book  which Timothy Holmseth is selling on Amazon.com titled, Babylonian Funeral:  The Satanic Ritual Sacrifice of Caylee Anthony.  It is only 83 pages long, not much of an indepth investigation by someone who claims to be an award winning journalist.

If you click the Look Inside! button on this book, the Table of contents lists 20 chapters, which is about 4 pages per chapter. And this “book” claims to find connections between  the HaLeigh Cummings case, Casey Anthony case and also the Jon Benet Ramsey case.

Observing a Disturbing Trend involving a BAR approved  lawyer and a LARP COURT Senior Counsel

In hindsight, there is a disturbing trend involving Robert David Steele and attorney Steven S. Biss involving various persons who are participating in the LARP court called the International Tribunal for Justice.  That sovereign citizen-styled international tribunal has a Constitution and a Treaty that requires one’s red thumb print alongside a signatory’s name. One should always be careful about participating in fake organizations, especially those that attempt to put on a convincing show.

Steven Biss is a Virginia licensed attorney who has made his living working with the legitimate American court system; one wonders why he works in such close conjunction with a former CIA spy that is involved in a LARP COURT that lacks genuine authority or power.

If one looks back to 2017, others have remarked on Steele’s statement that Manual Chavez III aka Defango would serve as the front (tip of the spear) person in an Arizona lawsuit which Biss had prepared for Chavez.  Defango had second thoughts about getting involved in that lawsuit against Jason Goodman of Crowdsource the Truth, and today seems to be forming an alliance with Goodman. We shall have to wait to see what that exactly entails with regard to the lawsuits against Goodman.

About that same time, David Seaman who has his own Youtube channel and claims to have been reporting on pedophilia/ human trafficking issues for ten years, became a witness for ITNJ.  Biss prepared this lawsuit for David Seaman which can be read here:  seaman lawsuit doc 1 12 3 2018.

Like the Timothy Holmseth case which was transferred from Virginia to Florida, the Seaman case was transferred from Virginia to California. That was when Seaman’s troubles began, as Biss dropped back from the lawsuit, leaving the plaintiff high and dry.  As that lawsuit went from having counsel to placing the plaintiff in a pro se position, it is apparent that very few non-attorneys are able to deal with seasoned corporate attorneys who know U. S. law inside and out.  Here is the document of the Defendant’s motion to dismiss.  seaman motion to dismiss 6 5 2019

A reader of my blog sent me these Twitter comments which discuss the Seaman case.

All of these actions involving the use of the U. S. judicial court system to fulfill some mission which is fronted by a LARP sovereign citizen styled Court, is troubling to observe.  The patterns of behavior noted in this article bear watching closely.  It is not for nothing that sovereign citizen false legal theories have caused many citizens to lose their bearings and to find themselves imprisoned for their paper terrorism.

Beware of being duped by those who have formed international tribunals based on sovereign citizen “legal” theories.  And if you think you have evidence of child trafficking, produce that evidence to those who can prosecute the perpetrators.  The ITNJ has no such authority to prosecute, and they have no authority to protect their so-called witnesses.

 

 

 

 

 

Sweigert vs. Goodman RICO lawsuit Document 77

On June 13, 2019, Document 77 was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the D. George Sweigert vs. Jason Goodman lawsuit.

Document 77 (23 pages)  Oversight concerning copies of pertinent letters

sweigert v goodman doc 77 june 13 2019

Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman Documents 123 & 124: Return of Lutzke Mail & Sweigert’s Supplement to Motion regarding Injunctive Relief

On June 6, 2019, Documents 123 and 124 were filed with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division in the Robert David Steele, et. al. vs. Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit.

Document 123 (2 pages) Return of Mail to Court from Susan Lutzke address on record

rds doc 123 june 6 2019 return of lutzke mail

Document 124 plus 9 exhibits  (30 pages)  Intervenor-Applicant’s FRCP Rule 15(d) Supplement to Motion for Leave to Seek Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 101)

rds doc 124 june 6 2019

D. George Sweigert, Intervenor-Applicant, Files Documents 101-103 in the Robert David Steele lawsuit, Requesting Injunctive Relief

On April 29, 2019, Documents 101, 102, 102-2, and 103 were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond, in the Robert David Steele et. al. vs. Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit.

Document 101 (2 pages)  Notice of Motion Requesting Leave of Court to File Motion for Injunctive Relief by Intervenor-Applicant  rds doc 101 429 2019

Document 102 (19 pages) Motion Requesting Leave of Court to File Motion for Injunctive Relief by Intervenor-Applicant  rds doc 102 429 2019

Document 102-2 (2 pages)  Proposed Order  rds doc 102 2 429 2019

Document 103 (48 pages + 29 pages exhibits Doc 103-1)  Memorandum of Law to Support Intervenor-Applicant’s Motion for Injunctive Relief  rds doc 103 429 2019

The Tidal Wave Hits the Beachhead: Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman – Documents 93 & 94 & 95

On April 11, 2019,  Documents 93 (plus exhibits),  94, and 95 were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division, in the Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman defamation lawsuit.

Document 93 (54 pages) Amended Motion to Intervene by Intervenor-Applicant Sweigert    rds doc 93 April 11 2019

Document 93-1 (1 page) Exhibits Certification  rds 93 1 exhibits certification April 11 2019

Document 93-2 (2 pages) Exhibit 1-A  rds 93 2 exhibit 1 A April 11 2019

Document 93-3 (3 pages)  Exhibit 1-B  rds 93 3 exhibit 1 B April 11 2019

Document 93-4 (2 pages) Exhibit 1-C  rds 93 4 exhibit 1 C April 11 2019

Document 93-5 (2 pages) Exhibit 1-D  rds 93 5 exhibit 1 D April 11 2019

Document 93-6 (5 pages0 Exhibit 1-E  rds 93 6 exhibit 2 April 11 2019

Document 93-7  (3 pages)  Exhibit 3  rds 93 7 exhibit 3 April 11 2019

Document 93-8  (8 pages) Exhibit 4  rds 93 8 exhibit 4 April 11 2019

Document 93-9  (6 pages)  Exhibit 5  rds 93 9 exhibit 5

Document 93-10 (3 pages)  Exhibit 6-A  rds 93 10 exhibit 6A April 11 2019

Document 93-11 (5 pages) Exhibit 6-B  rds doc 93 11 exhibit 6B April 11 2019

Document 93-12 (8 pages)  Exhibit 6-C  rds 93 12 exhibit 6C April 11, 2019

Document 93-13 (5 pages) Exhibit 6-D  rds doc 93 13 exhibit 6D April 11 2019

Document 93-14  (11 pages)  Exhibit 7  rds 93 14 exhibit 7 april 11 2019

Document 93-15  (9 pages)  Exhibit 8  rds doc 93 15 exhibit 8

Document 94 (27 pages) Memorandum of Law to Support Intervenor Applicant’s Amended Motion to Intervene  rds doc 94 April 11 2019

Document 95 (23 pages)  Patricia A. Negron’s Answer & Affirmative Defenses to the Amended Complaint  rds doc 95 April 11 2019 Patricia Negron Answer

Is Ethical Slacker Jason Goodman Ensuring that David Hawkins Drinks from the Same Cup of Judgment?

It is difficult these days to come up with a snappy retort to the muddling mannerisms of David Hawkins, whose mind loop seems to be getting shorter and shorter, despite Jason Goodman’s attempt to introduce a new concept into his titles.  Yesterday’s video was titled Is Ethical Hacker Sweigert a Weatherman & Cornfield Cruiser Abuser?

The description explains, “The Weather Underground always remained dedicated to destroying the United States of America.  With Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers on faculty at Northwestern and UIC it seems likely that they remain active in their pursuits.  Did disgruntled ex-USAF “ethical hacker” and miscreant cyber mob leader Sweigert use his skills to aid in efforts?  David joins me to explore this and other topics.”

The ever alert Crowdsource the Troofers who had assembled in the live chatroom marveled that there were so many thumbs down votes given at the very start of the program.  And it was not long into the show when David Hawkins was seen drinking the last drop from his cup of judgment, as no doubt he is contemplating how to explain to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia his promotion of  “fact less” illogical theories with co-conspirator, Jason Goodman.

April 3, 2019  David Hawkins slurping from the cup of judgment of 94 downvotes.  Bottoms Up!

We have heard all of these false allegations and strange theories before, and at the 11:41 mark, Jason Goodman interrupts David Hawkins to discuss his analysis of Dave Sweigert, saying, “…can I address what you’re saying about veterans for a moment because that is a recurring theme and what they like to say about you and I, I don’t know, I’ve revealed this before but my own father is a veteran and of course I love him and respect the work that he did in the Navy.”

It appears that Jason Goodman had anticipated making his comment about his father’s Navy background, for in the lower right corner of his photo collage he displays the word NAVY as part of David Hawkins’ hallucinations alleging that Dave Sweigert is somehow connected to alleged terrorist Weathermen connections to the 9/11 attacks. All of this is the product of the vain imaginations of Goodman and Hawkins, as no evidence has been provided to back their allegations, whatsoever.Jason Goodman adds, “We’ve got other veterans who appear on the show, Scott Bennett.  It’s quite interesting how Scott is attacked by this same group but we don’t accuse them of hating veterans and we’ve heard quite a lot from Mr. Sweigert and how he considers himself a whistleblower.  Scott Bennett is also a whistleblower again being attacked.”

“Mr. Sweigert has sued the CIA, which I don’t know, perhaps that’s you know, going against the government, but he’s also sued the Department of the Army.  Now his lawsuit against the CIA was dismissed and the Department of Justice in their pleadings said that his claims had no basis, he had no standing and it was dismissed so I wonder is it possible that Mr. Sweigert is a disgruntled veteran.”  [Sweigert has explained that he sued the CIA to get documents for his whistleblower case, which resulted in the recovery of $1.2 million.]

“He’s told us about how he was captured by the Sandinistas and when I asked him if that meant that he was involved in Iran-Contra, certainly criminal activity executed by members of the military, he got angry about that.  I wonder how long he was in that room with the boa constrictor that the Contras tortured him with, according to his own words.”

“I have no knowledge beyond what he’s publicly told us and certainly if you had experienced the types of that, Mr. Sweigert had, his veteran father locking him in the basement to sleep on newspapers with dog excrement, being rejected by his own father.  He’s told us about how his brother George was favored as a basketball star.”

“Perhaps he joined the military to get some degree of acceptance and I wonder how long he was in that Sandinista prison with the snake and I wonder how that might make you feel about an Air Force that failed to rescue you, and then caused you to sue the United States government, to sue the Department of the Army.  Perhaps Mr. Sweigert has been turned to a person who hates the US government and wants to destroy it in the way that Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers have dedicated their lives…”  (14.21)

What Jason Goodman has stated above is his construction of a collage of fact and fiction on Dave Sweigert, to divert attention from the questions people have been asking about Goodman’s involvement in the Port of Charleston dirty bomb incident on June 14, 2017.  If you are new to Crowdsource the Truth, and had not followed the ins and outs of that story over the past two years ago, allow me to backtrack a bit.

When the Port of Charleston story broke, the only name I had heard of, connected with that event was George Webb, who I recalled had been discussed in a Hagmann Report interview with Rebekah Roth. In that interview, Rebekah Roth, the airline stewardess who wrote 3 fictional books espousing her 9/11 theories, was extolling the research abilities of George Webb. Months later, she sent her three books to Defango, and encouraged him to be the last man standing.  That advice was rather strange, especially coming from someone who claimed to have access to government insider information.  It was because I did not know much about the persons involved in the Port of Charleston incident, that I began looking closely at Crowdsource the Truth and the subsequent federal lawsuits that involved Jason Goodman as a defendant.

Just prior to the Port of Charleston incident, Nathan Stolpman of the Lift the Veil YouTube channel had raised the question as to whether the person behind the  pseudonym Dave Acton was also George Webb.  So when the Port of Charleston incident occurred involving George Webb Sweigert, his brother David George Sweigert aka Dave Acton stepped into the public light to apologize on behalf of his family for George’s involvement in that costly port shutdown. Months later, Dave Sweigert was still attempting to deal with the aftermath of all the social media gossip surrounding his brother George Webb and related matters. That gossip got out of hand, particularly as Jason Goodman of Crowdsource the Truth added gasoline to the fire when he tried to cover over his involvement in the Port of Charleston incident.

Much of what Jason Goodman related in the transcribed portion of  yesterday’s April 3, 2019 video, involves documentation found in Document 51 which was filed May 22, 2018 as the Declaration of D. George Sweigert in the Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman defamation lawsuit.  That document and the related exhibits can be viewed in full here:  rds doc 51 and rds doc 51 1.

The question needs to be asked:  Why is Jason Goodman continuing to perpetuate his false accusations regarding Dave Sweigert and Iran-Contra, when this was refuted almost a year ago in Document 51?

For example, we find Document 51 explaining:

Declaration made under penalty of perjury by D. George Sweigert May 22, 2018

Dave Sweigert has stated on air that the forced landing he was involved in happened in 1981 when Jimmy Carter was President. Thus the events which Goodman discusses regarding Iran-Contra occurred when Sweigert was attending college in Texas, and show that Goodman has a reckless regard for both historical and personal timelines.

Another screenshot of a portion of Document 51-1 Exhibits what Jason Goodman had been stating a year ago:And finally, here is a screenshot of another portion of the Document 51-1 Exhibits:Jason Goodman repeatedly fails to take responsibility for his reckless allegations. And his YouTube boast of finishing fights has entered the legal arena in two federal court cases, where as a defendant in a defamation lawsuit as well as a RICO lawsuit,  his arguments will be examined using the federal civil procedures for evidence, and under the penalties of perjury.

That same scrutiny may soon apply to David Hawkins’ words and actions as well, if the Judge in the Robert David Steele lawsuit allows Sweigert’s Motion to Intervene in that case.

 

 

 

Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman lawsuit: Documents 83 & 84 representing Kevin Marsden Declaration and Sweigert Notification to Canada

On March 28, 2019, two documents were filed in the Robert David Steele, et. al. vs Jason Goodman, et. al. defamation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division.

Document 83 (14 pages) filed by Kevin Marsden: Statement in Response to “Defendant’s Opposition to the Motion to Intervene” by Non-Party

rds doc 83 march 28 2019

Document 84 (13 pages) filed by D. George Sweigert:  Preliminary Notification to the Government of Canada

rds doc 84 march 28 2019

THE POINT OF NO RETURN: David Hawkins Bores into the Weather Underground Tunnel and Discovers Jewish Communists who are “psychopaths and sociopaths and unindicted killers”

Keep your tongue from evil, and thy lips from speaking guile.  Psalm 34:13

In the poignant song, The Point of No Return, songwriters Jeff Limbol, Hank Sherman, and Pete Steiner capture the end result of the dangerous seductions of the Phantom of the Opera in these words, Past the point of no return, the final threshold, the bridge is crossed, so stand and watch it burn.  We’ve passed the point of no return.”

There is a point of no return which is real and identifiable in the life of the individual who engages in sin, justifies it when reproved, and tries to turn the tables upon the messenger who warns of the final threshold.  One characteristic of someone who goes from telling a lie to becoming a LIAR is banality.  Banality is lacking in originality as to be obvious and boring.

So I was interested in what Jason Goodman said to David Hawkins, as he related that Kevin Marsden had called him up one time to warn him that Hawkins was lying to him. Goodman reiterated his support for David Hawkins’ banal stories, and now both men work in conjunction to attack the man who tried to turn them back from the path they are treading.

One is not a conspiracy; it takes at least two.  And Jason Goodman and David Hawkins show us how it is done.

Jason Goodman produced another video on March 22, 2019 featuring the strange musings of David Hawkins, Can Split Tunnels & Broken Chains Allow EVL Teachers to Attack Federal Bridge?  With David Hawkins. This 49 minute preview of a Patreon show for subscribers only, features once again another absurd photo collage aimed at disparaging Dave Sweigert, who is portrayed as a janitor cleaning up evidence, and presumably disposing or “spoliating” it.  That Sweigert is the main point of this collage is highlighted by the caption Jason Goodman has assigned it, calling it Tri-Tunnel-SweigertYet the underlying theme of their show has nothing to do with Sweigert, but has much to do with modern day Jewish American domestic terrorism.

What does Jason Goodman mean when he references his Jewish heritage?

I recently posted Document 78 of the Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman lawsuit, and on page 10, line 1, the author, Jason Goodman, states, “Defendant Goodman is not and has never been associated in any way with Mossad…”.  He asserts, “The rumor was started by the co-conspirators in order that their network could spread this information to earn money on Steemit and through other methods, and to play upon rampant, hateful, anti-Jewish sentiment among their fans and viewers.  The Campaign has allowed them to persecute Defendant based solely on his Jewish heritage, denying him of his constitutional right to presumption of innocence, retarding his financial and psychological well-being and inciting hate speech and foul threats in live comments from viewers.  The Campaign leverages this totally false claim to defame Goodman and engender hatred for Defendant throughout the world via the internet.”

Since I was named as one of the third-party co-conspirators, without any evidence provided by Goodman, I have to state at this juncture that I have never posted anything on Steemit, my blog can be read for free, I have never asked for monetary support ever, and I have never asserted that Jason Goodman is employed by Mossad.  I have always felt that the Israeli Intelligence agency, Mossad, was too professional to risk employing unstable personalities.

I have no idea what Jason Goodman considers his Jewish heritage to consist of.

As noted earlier, in the photo collage shown below, Jason Goodman targets Dave Sweigert, who he continually insults in an unrelenting campaign of lies.  Also inserted in Goodman’s image is a photo of an affectionate couple, sitting together in embrace, who were once leaders of the now defunct Weather Underground terrorist group in the sixties/seventies era of student activism against the Vietnam War.

March 22, 2019 Jason Goodman CSTT video, showing collage labeled Tri Tunnel-Sweigert

That history, which is brought to our remembrance by Hawkins and Goodman, represents the out workings of the American Jewish privileged class that exalted Communist domination and oppression over millions of persons,  during the Vietnam era.  Since its takeover of Russia in 1917, Communism has slaughtered millions, and destroyed the lives and hopes of the citizens of Russia, China, North Korea, and other nations.  It represents the Marxist/Leninist/Trotsky elitist socialist philosophy that when radicalized becomes Communism; for once the promise of freedom for oppressed working class citizens is put into place, these radical leaders turn and steal the fruits of the labor and the land and possessions of these very same persons.

The Vietnam War was a troublesome era, when military escalation by America attempted to stem the tide of Communism sweeping across Asia.  This is a very complex story, as some of the most interesting first hand stories of Vietnam veterans  relate.  (As an example of a Vietnam/Laos narrative written by a very fine man, I reviewed in 2016, The Expendable Elite:  One Soldier’s Journey into Covert Warfare, by Lt. Col. United States Army Special Forces (Ret.) Daniel Marvin,  here and here.)

Bill Ayers looking like a wimp and Bernardine Dohrn, the radical Communist agitator

Returning to the topic of Jason Goodman’s March 22, 2019 video, David Hawkins made several remarks beginning at the 1.5 mark, referencing “the woman who is an un-intercepted, unindicted terrorist leader by the name of Bernardine Dohrn“, followed by, (2.11)  “I would allege that this woman never stopped being the leader of the Weather Underground organization because the Weather Underground organization was never dismantled, it just went into a different level of camouflage  which can be described by the evil (EVL) teachers’ community…”, concluding that,  (3.26) “they’re psychopaths and sociopaths and unindicted killers.”

The Vietnam War shed the blood of my generation

I KNOW this era, although I was a few years younger than Ayers and Dohrn. When I was in high school, my father, who published the weekly newspaper, The Outlook, took me to see Timothy Leary, the Harvard lecturer in Clinical Psychology who promoted LSD. We sat cross-legged on the floor, listening to him speak nonsense.  In hindsight, the influence of these uncaring intellectuals on my generation, which had no previous experience with drugs, was unconscionable.  At some point in his career, Leary was jailed, and one of the groups which helped him to escape to Algeria, was the Weather Underground terrorist group.

I began freshman classes at the University of Washington in 1968.  It was during the Vietnam student demonstration days, and often various radical speakers such as Susan Stern of the Seattle Liberation Front lectured the students outside of the common area called the Hub, on the “revolution”. I can recall sitting in a classroom listening to Michael Lerner and I think I also heard Mark Rudd, who was one of the major leaders of SDS.

I was familiar with the faces of what became known in 1970 as the Seattle Seven; in fact, my father and stepmother were close friends with a Jewish couple whose son was in the Seattle Weather Underground, and indicted as part of the Seattle Seven. Another recollection I have is two members of this group justifying to my father why the Cuban revolutionary Che Guevara was their idol.  Looking at FBI reports from that time period, I see that Bernardine Dohrn, was one of those who visited not only Cuba, but the Vietnamese communists.  I was working back then as a clerk collecting parking fines for the campus police, when one of these violent agitators placed an ill constructed explosive device in a pile of UW student newspapers on the counter top. By the grace of God, that device failed to explode.

Although Bill Ayers provided the Gentile face of the Weather Underground, the group was overwhelmingly Jewish radical communists. Before Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn became the affectionate couple seen in Jason Goodman’s photo collage, Bill Ayers’ girlfriend was Diana Outghton, and Bernardine Dohrn’s boyfriend was John Jacobs, considered to be the founder of the Weathermen.

In an article published November 15, 2017, on The Occidental Observer.net, titled A Forgotten Revolutionary:  John Jacobs, Founder of Weatherman, Karl Nemmersdorf writes, “Bernardine Dohrn, the new ally and lover of Jacobs, was a twenty-six year old, half-Jewish radical with a law degree.  She was ‘brilliant, cool, focused, militant, and highly sexual.’  She had thrown herself into the antiwar movement and hit New York in the fall of 1967 in a miniskirt and high leather boots.  In June 1968 she won election as one of three SDS national officers; during the election a suspicious member asked her, ‘Do you consider yourself a socialist?’  She ‘eyed him evenly for a moment and then answered:  ‘I consider myself a revolutionary communist.’  She won in a landslide.  Well, well, well:  two Jewish communists suddenly spring up like dragon’s teeth out of the foam of the New Left.  Together she and Jacobs began planning to take over SDS and lead a revolution.”

When the Weathermen accidentally set off one of their bombs in an apartment, Bill Ayers’ girlfriend, Diana Outghton, died when she was shredded to pieces. Bill Ayers’  Fugitive Days:  Memoirs of An Antiwar Activist, recalls the phone call he received giving him this dreadful news.  It was Bernardine Dohrn, calling as a friend, and Ayers remembers hearing,  “You’ve got to leave now.  Tomorrow at the latest.  We’ll meet up in a week at the shore.  There’s been a terrible accident.”  Bill Ayers was in shock from the news of Diana’s death.  He says, “I am running for my life, but I don’t know where I’m going.  In a minute I’ll be making lists-ditch the cars, they’ll say, hide the evidence. In a minute I’ll be panting to repair, struggling to understand where things went so awfully wrong.  But not yet, Now my mind is exploding and I’m running all alone, virtually on empty.  That was March 1970, and the American war in Vietnam was half done, though we didn’t know it yet.  The woman on the other end of the phone, would save me soon, and soon after that we would plunge together into a subterranean river, the strong, swift brown god of life pulling us forward for decades to come, but we didn’t know that yet, either.  All that was certain was this:  Diana was suddenly dead and I was-in a flash-unhinged and going under.”

What is interesting is this statement taken from Roots of Radicalism:  Jews, Christians and the New Left, by Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter, published in 1996. They state, “…the early SDS was heavily Jewish both in its leadership and its activist cadres. Key SDS leaders included Richard Flacks, who played an important role in its formation and growth, as well as Al Haber, Robb Ross, Steve Max, Mike Spiegal, Mike Klonsky, Todd Gitlin, Mark Rudd, and others.  Indeed, during its first few years, SDS was largely funded by the League for Industrial Democracy, a heavily Jewish socialist (but anti-communist) organization.  SDS’s early successes were at elite universities containing substantial numbers of Jewish students and sympathetic Jewish faculty, including the University of Wisconsin at Madison, Brandeis, Oberlin, and the University of California at Berkely.  SDS leaders were not unaware of their roots.”

Quoted elsewhere in this book is a statement from Alexander W. Astin’s “Personal and Environmental Determinants of Student Activism”, which says, “At many schools, Jewish predominance continued into the late 1960’s.  In a national survey sponsored by the American Council of Education in 1966-67, the best single predictor of campus protest was the presence of  a substantial number of students from Jewish families.”

One of the notable things about radical activists is that they often take an existing organization which has a comparatively moderate orientation, and enter into leadership positions to either take it over, or splinter off a group using the resources others have provided.  It not only happens in political organizations like SDS, which floundered after suffering internal turmoil created by the radical activism of Bernardine Dohrn and her former boyfriend, John Jacobs, but I have seen the same process at work in church take-overs when a few persons enter in covertly and get the church by-laws changed, to give them unparalleled authority.

So why didn’t David Hawkins and Jason Goodman enter into a deep discussion of American Jewish domestic terrorism?  After all, they are the ones bringing up the Weather Underground philosophy…

So at the ten minute mark, Jason Goodman says to David Hawkins, “But why wasn’t she, I mean, I don’t understand why she’s not in jail (a), and even if she’s not, we need to look into why she’s not, but like you know, there’s cases of course where, uh, technicalities related to evidence or whatever, someone who should be in jail maybe is not, but why would a respected university then hire that person and doesn’t it allow us to question virtually anything that, that person is doing at the university and be suspicious of what they’re doing as you said these are Marxist subversives who are now educating the youth of America and there are some people on the internet who want to criticize you and I for asking valid questions about this.  They don’t seem to be criticizing anyone else, they’re very, very focused on you and I, they’re very focused on discouraging people from participating in our weekly subscriber only show on Patreon.com slash…….”.

Now, that is banality par excellence!

I  have just illustrated the reason why Ayers and Dohrn have been employed at universities, despite their violent background.  Jason Goodman says he asks valid questions, but then he fails to get to the heart of the answer. He despises anyone who does provide answers. Why does he not post source references in the show description, like Kevin Marsden does, so we can understand those technicalities related to his evidence and all that? 

It’s always Patreon dot com.  Patreon dot com…Patreon dot com….signs of a paid conspiracy.

 

 

 

 

Recipes For Disaster from the “Worst Alibi of the Week” Cookbook Club: Part I

(I dedicate this article to three of my subscribers who hide anonymously behind their WordPress.com Fake Cookbook blogs.)

I am reading Recipes for Disaster, and trying to figure out what Jason Goodman and David Hawkins are cooking up this week.

I might as well confess it now, before it comes out in a courtroom.  I am a Housewife.  I make meatloaf, I dust off knickknacks, I take out the trash, I plant vegetables and flowers, I paint walls better than Picasso, I sew “gifts” for friends, whether they want them or not.

More importantly —I see things as they really are. I see cobwebs, that piece of gum somebody stuck under the dining room table, greenish mold on that refrigerated leftover, cat hair floating in the sunbeam coming through the front window, and Jason Goodman talking with his oily voice to that dithering old man …no, no, no, I am not talking about Charles Ortel—it’s that other one, David Hawkins!

The prize for The Worst Alibi of the Week goes to Jason Goodman’s Document 78;  so what will he be cooking up next from his Recipes for Disaster?

Look at the consternation on Jason Goodman’s face as he attempts to squelch any rumors going around about his ability to wield his soldering iron in the world of circuit boards.  You see, the last time he tried to explain why he was waving his instrument in front of young women on Tinder, Queen Tut forced him to come up with a flimsy alibi for his behavior.

March 15, 2019 video of Jason Goodman describing how he developed “a number of different stereoscopic camera systems”.

So on March 15, 2019, Jason Goodman published a video, Grounded Truth of Max 8 EVL Teachers Pension Fraud with David Hawkins.  At the 6.03 mark, Jason Goodman explains, “Many people know that before I had created Crowdsource the Truth, I ran a 3D production company called 21st Century 3 D, and I’ve developed a number of different stereoscopic camera systems.  Now I don’t currently hold any patents on these things because when I went through the traditional route of applying for, and obtaining patents, there was a huge cost associated and I ultimately didn’t do it.”

Note first, Jason Goodman’s continual use of the word “traditional” throughout his dialogue; a word he holds in disdain.  Secondly, the huge cost associated with the patenting of “his” camera systems would probably have arisen from being countered by the patent lawyers for Panasonic and Apple.   

“But I did with a small team of non-engineers at our office in New York City.  I reverse engineered curiously enough some Panasonic DVX  100 cameras and some Apple Mac Mini computers to create this Frankenstein-like conglomeration of electronic equipment that resulted in what is now an internationally famous stereoscopic motion picture camera.”

What is a small team of non-engineers?   

“And I can tell you, David, that when I sought out to do this first I did consult experienced engineers at Panasonic, experienced engineers at Apple Computers and all of them told me that what I was proposing was absolutely ridiculous, and would be impossible that reverse engineering and human soldering  these eight layer printed circuit boards that were designed by computers and automated factories, would just simply destroy all the components and would never work.”

Sounds reasonable….

“However, five of these cameras were ultimately built, deployed around the world and have shot many four-four-four- RGB uncompressed stereoscopic motion pictures.”

“So again, I think that you and I asking questions that might defy traditional engineers in these fields or I should say might defy their understanding of how these things work-well, it doesn’t matter until you actually ground truth, your hypothesis, by actually slicing in half two Panasonic DVX 100 cameras, cutting open two Apple Mac Mini Computers, de-soldering all the components you don’t want and wiring this stuff together to actually make a functional video camera.  Well, no engineer could deny that this works and it did exactly what I wanted it to, even though that’s not what it was originally intended to do.  What do you think of that?(8.24)

Well, apparently something worked as Goodman became a 3D cameraman in Hollywood for a time.  But are we to believe Jason Goodman’s story that he defied skilled electronics experts when he sawed into an existing electronic instrument and rewired it so that it functioned as a more complex unit?  What kind of saw did he use?  How did he know just where to cut and re-solder?  Has anyone ever heard where and how he personally gained those skills?  For  now, let’s just say that  Jason Goodman had  developed a recipe for transforming cameras and computers into 3D Shish KaBobs.

So next, let’s slice and dice the first few minutes of the Crowdsource the Truth video which followed on  March 20, 2019.

Jason Goodman: (.50)  “…good to see you David, so you know, I want to start off just by reiterating there is a small group of very vocal people who seem to dislike the process that you and I are engaged in here, [ I think he is referring to those named as co-conspirators in his Document 78, filed in the Robert David Steele lawsuit] and I want to remind everyone that there’s a traditional crime scene investigation process that is employed by police departments and investigative bodies around the world and I’m sure there are variations depending on where you go and what the nature of the investigation is, but I think we could all agree that there are pretty traditional ways in which crimes are investigated and those methods have a certain degree of success.  I think it would be inaccurate to say the traditional crime scene investigation has a 100% effective rate.  They’re not solving 100% of all the crimes and when you and I about a crime like the JonBenet Ramsey murder, David, that’s certainly a cold case that remains unsolved, wouldn’t you agree?” [Well, traditional CSI might not solve 100% of all cases; but so far, Jason Goodman and David Hawkins have solved NONE.]

David Hawkins: (1.53)  “Yeah, totally, and in fact I would say that these traditional law enforcement or crime scene investigation techniques where you’re talking about high-value target mass casualty events with an implied organization behind them, I would say they have a 100% chance of failure.  Over to you.”

Jason Goodman: (2.11  )  “Well, they certainly don’t have a 100% success rate, so what that sort of invites is the prospect at very least that someone could introduce an alternative to traditional crime scene investigation and what if one of those methods was simply to take all of the unsolved or let’s say, a large group of unsolved crimes and put them together and start comparing them so if we took a series of two, three, a dozen unsolved crimes from the past 50 years and started looking at them and comparing  what they might have in common, there are certainly comparisons we could draw.”  [By concentrating on “unsolved crimes” which can also be viewed as “the perfect crime”, Goodman and Hawkins seem to be looking at how others have committed crimes and gotten away with it, by having a perfect alibi.  After all, it is not as if these two men have discovered new evidence, in which a DNA analysis might reveal the perpetrator of a crime.]

“Now, I don’t suggest that we take every shoplifting case of the past 50 years, but certainly if we’re to look at let’s say murders that involved EXTREME cruelty, I mean not someone robbing a bank and firing a gun.  We know the motive for that, but  the torture and murder of a 6-year old girl, it’s, I mean particularly when we’re talking about the JonBenet Ramsey murder as you have pointed out and others have pointed out, it just demonstrates such extreme cruelty, such extreme lack of respect for human life and anything that any sensible person would consider normal or moral. It’s so beyond the pale, it’s difficult for normal humans to even conceive of and think about this so if we were to look, David, only at unsolved crimes that involved extreme cruelty, extreme violence and were to compare any possible similarities between those crimes, perhaps that might reveal some element of evidence that could help solve one of those crimes and if you and I, or anyone, was to apply this non-traditional crime scene investigation technique to unsolved crimes, if that technique were to solve even one of these crimes there would be a benefit to it, don’t you think?  [Should we be concerned that these two men are attracted to extreme cruelty?  Especially when their defamation of others has crossed the line of extreme malice?]

David Hawkins:  (4.22)  “Yeah, totally and what’s interesting is what category of groups of people sort of crawl out of the woodwork to basically try and sabotage this novel-, actually in many ways it’s not so novel because if you go look at the fiction of Sherlock Holmes, that’s what he proposed….(7.04)… going back to there are very few people in the world who can give you the circumstances that led up to event, I think we can link the JonBenet ransom note to the massacre at the New Zealand mosque...”.

So David, anyone who questions your methods can be likened to a cockroach-like saboteur crawling out of the wood work? 

It is important to observe just how important it is to Jason Goodman that he “prove something- anything, really”, that standard evidence gathering has “failed” to do. For example in Document 78, he wanted to prove that a conspiracy exists against him.

But if you read D. George Sweigert’s letter in Document 81, filed March 18, 2019, it was pointed out that Jason Goodman failed in Document 78 to identify all the facts that he, as the responder, disagreed with; also he failed to authenticate his exhibits, which rendered them a legal nullity. He was also advised to demonstrate logical relevance, and the chain of custody for electronic authentication of his evidence.

These standard, or “traditional” procedures are to ensure the authenticity of evidence in a court of law; but this is of no consequence to Jason Goodman nor to his guest, David Hawkins ,who purports to be able to link the JonBenet ransom note written years ago, to the recent massacre in New Zealand.

In several interviews with David Hawkins regarding the JonBenet ransom note, it appears that Jason Goodman has lifted some ideas from the author of that note, as he also has identified a small foreign faction within his named group of co-conspirators who he claims are opposing him with legal impunity, from Poland and New Zealand.

But why is this note so coveted  and enshrined by Goodman and Hawkins?  

Just because no one has ever been prosecuted for the JonBenet Ramsey murder, does it really follow that this represents the perfect crime, and the ransom note was the perfect alibi of misdirection?

Let’s see what a traditional law enforcement opinion on the ransom note has stated at a blog called dyingwords.net, written by  Garry Rodgers, a retired Royal Canadian Mounted Police homicide detective and forensic coroner.  In addition, Rodgers claims to have also served as a sniper on British SAS-trained Emergency Response Teams, and he lives in Vancouver, British Columbia, where interestingly David Hawkins resides.

In an April 16, 2016 article, Who Really Killed JonBenet Ramsey?, Rodgers addresses the ransom note. In brief, he says, “The first thing that comes to my mind when reading the note is that it’s nonsense.  It’s complete and utter bullshit and here’s why: (1) It’s very long with a lot of unnecessary, redundant information.”  Later he observes, “…another principle is that people expose their psychological profile in their writing.”  To which he asks, “So what does the JonBenet Ramsey note say about the author?  It’s clearly a deceitful attempt to distort the facts, using unrealistic, bizarre, and unbelievable demands to shift attention from the reality of the situation.”

That latter sentence perfectly expresses what a number of persons have been stating about the crime scene theories of David Hawkins and Jason Goodman.

In Part II, I continue discussing this video, picking up on Hawkins’ obsession with Bernardine Dohrn, and the implications this theory has for Jason Goodman and his Crowdsource the Truth platform.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Ouroboros Effect: JASON GOODMAN of Crowdsource the Truth with DAVID HAWKINS of Reverse Engineered CSI Storyboards

The words of a wise man’s mouth are gracious; but the lips of a fool will swallow up himself.  Ecclesiastes 10:12

In the occult world there is a symbol that correlates with King Solomon’s  pronouncement that the lips of a fool will swallow up himself. As seen in this Wikipedia image of the Ouroboros as a snake or serpent swallowing its tail, we also find a similar image in the infinity loop snake used by the NSA to represent its GHIDRA  reverse engineering hacker tool.

Ouroboros Judaic styled symbol on the door of a Budapest Theosophical Society.

An Ouroboros as an Infinity Loop to represent a reverse engineering NSA hacker tool

GHIDRA is an open source tool released last week at the RSA security conference, representing an advanced hacking tool that is a Reverse-Engineering Platform used to take “compiled”, deployed software and “decompile” it.  In other words this tool can take a program’s binary coding, and turn it back into a “human-readable structure, logic, and set of commands”. According to WIRED, in a March 5, 2019 article, The NSA Makes Ghidra, A Powerful Cybersecurity Tool, Open Source, “Reverse engineering is a crucial process for malware analysts and threat intelligence researchers, because it allows them to work backward from software they discover in the wild–like malware being used to carry out attacks–to understand how it works….”.

Today we are going to consider how Jason Goodman of Crowdsource the Truth is swallowing his tail, or perhaps we should say, the Tale of Reverse Crime Scene Investigator David Hawkins.

The description of their March 6, 2019 video asks, “Why were Lockheed Martin security procedures stood down in both the murder of Jonbenet Ramsey and the explosions at the Pentagon on 9/11?” If you believe the assumptions on which that question is asked, you will like the question posed in the title of their video, “Did a Lockheed Bit Spread Hit Squad Take Out Jonbenet & The Pentagon The Same Way?”  Welcome to the nonsensical questions of two men who find themselves fascinating in their vainglorious attempts to avoid accountability for their words and deeds.

March 6, 2019

Jason Goodman begins this show, saying, “David, our show today promises to be one of the most fascinating, most in-depth that you and I have done yet…”. To which David Hawkins replies, “…I’m fascinated to see where this ends up, we always discover on the fly, right?”

The first four plus minutes consists of advertising their wares, but Jason says at the 2.42 mark, “… so what you and I have attempted to do here David, is to create a new form of investigative journalism and rather than finance that through the traditional means of advertiser driven sponsorship by gigantic corporate owned new entities which are beholden to wealthy individuals and wealthy corporations in a way that you and I are not, this is an entirely new approach to investigation and dissemination of news where we invite people to participate and we certainly want them to do that by joining us on Patreon.com/Reverse CSI Storyboards and Patreon.com/Crowdsource the Truth.”

Pay to participate? Is this Karaoke Night? Nah…this is more exciting, like a Safari Club. If you want to join these two vigilantes who are hunting down  dangerous criminals, there are membership dues.

The Making of a Hunter’s Blind

This photographic collage, or as Goodman calls it, his “political cartoon”, is a HUNTER’S BLIND by which Goodman and Hawkins pretend to crowdsource an investigation as their cover for sighting Dave Sweigert “in the crosshairs”.  Notice the exploitation of a murdered child,  Jonbenet Ramsey for this purpose, as Hawkins and Goodman compare an unrelated serial murderer’s MO with the shocking manner of death of this child.

“All is One” Alchemy

At the 4.35 mark, Jason Goodman adds, “…there’s nothing wrong with you and I speculating about possible motives, methods, perpetrators who would be involved in this murder (i.e. JonBenet Ramsey)…”

Alchemical symbol “The All is One”

Continuing at the 6.37 mark, Jason Goodman introduces a Canadian serial killer who was a military man, saying, “…fascinating as we delve into the mind of a serial killer and I want people to understand the differences between a mass murderer and serial killers.  Now again this is all going back to the use of open source tools, certainly David, myself and you, we haven’t been trained as crime-scene investigators…”. And then Goodman justifies the use of amateur crime scene investigators by which their unique talents can be utilized to observe “open source publicly available tools that allow a crowdsource investigation into this type of thing to have such tremendous power that it can’t be overlooked...”.The man chosen as their serial killer model just so happens to have been an Air Force Colonel for Canada who is totally unrelated to the Jonbenet Ramsey murder. As seen in the screenshot below, the purpose of this choice is to produce a psychological transference of the crimes committed by one Air Force murderer onto their most recent prey who is an Air Force veteran, who is totally unrelated to all of the facts of the crime scene storyboard which Hawkins is inventing.

Jason Goodman is referring to Dave Sweigert, who is that “certain other Air Force veteran”, while the image shows the Canadian military Air Force serial killer dressed in women’s skimpy apparel.

At the 9.24 mark, Jason Goodman says, “the other thing I want to point out David, is that there are a number of military veterans who have taken to criticizing you ( i. e. besides Dave Sweigert, there is  Kevin Alan Marsden, who is investigating the credentials of Hawkins), criticizing me, seizing on individual’s statements in a way that’s intended to disparage us or discourage people from participating in these Crowdsource investigations or the financing of them by becoming subscribers on Patreon.com/Reverse CSI Storyboards or Patreon.com/Crowdsource the Truth.”

“But I  want to reiterate my personal opinion that the simple fact of being a military veteran does not afford someone an automatic pass, it does not earn them respect automatically because it is a fact that there are psychopathic killers who join the military and even when they are veterans may have evil tendencies, so we must scrutinize each person equally and that is with the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, but of course Russell Williams’ confession to multiple rapes, torture, and brutal murder certainly supersede any accolades he would have earned as a distinguished member of the Canadian forces.”

“So I want to talk a bit about this today David, and there is a certain other Air Force veteran who may be disappointed that we have not included his, uh, well his likeness, let’s leave it at that in today’s image but quite frankly I’ve become bored with this individual in his persistent attempts to shut us down so I just want to point out a few things in the confession of Russell Williams and then I’ll turn it over to you and stop talking,  David.”

Jason Goodman is confessing that he replaced his usual mocking image of Dave Sweigert in his photographic collage, with a cross dressing Canadian Air Force serial murderer.

Jason Goodman continues his discussion later on, and at the 13.09 mark says, “…and of course David, you have speculated, I would underscore that a lot of our investigations begin with speculation based on technological signatures at the crime scene, evidence at the crime scene connecting that to methods, things, individuals that would have access to this technology etc. and there are remarkable connections between Russell Williams and the way in which the Jonbenet Ramsey murder was perpetuated.”

Not all of the accused are corrupt, but just vulnerable to hackers

At the 20.25 mark, David Hawkins is looking at the collage image of four of the largest defense contractors in the world, and he remarks, “…just to clarify it, I’m not saying that the Lockheed Martin Directors are corrupt, or the Boeing directors are corrupt, I will say they are vulnerable to the kind of man-in-the-middle attack or hacking attack allegedly executed by people such as the ethical hacker, Mr. Sweigert.”

Cause and Effect of The Port of Charleston dirty bomb incident

Jason Goodman at the 33.15 mark says, “These are all extremely valid questions David and it seems that the more you and I ask these questions, the more we come under fire so that’s a curious set of circumstances in and of itself.  You’ve referenced this contact that’s been made to the Coast Guard.” (the screen shows a partial return address of Sweigert with the date February 22, 2019).

“I don’t know if people are fully aware of this.  I think we’ve spoken about it in previous shows, but of course there’s an individual out there who’s taken it upon himself to contact Captain Jason Tama of the United States Coast Guard Sector, New York, with a rather alarming letter indicating to the Captain, (reads from letter) “As you may be aware, the true target of a dirty bomb hoax appears to be the Port of New York, in New York and in New Jersey.”Continuing to read from the Sweigert letter to the Coast Guard, Jason Goodman relates, “New evidence available via open sourced intelligence (in social media) provides indicators about the true intended target of dirty bomb hoax of June 14, 2017…”.  Goodman stops reading in mid-sentence, but the screen shot of the letter shows the sentence is finished with was not the Port of Charleston, South Carolina.  The apparent terrorist-style controllers of the event (alleged to be Jason David Goodman and George Webb Sweigert) were misinformed about the position of the MEMPHIS MAERSK container ship and executed their “cyber-attack” a day late.  Based on the totality of newer OSINT evidence it appears Goodman/Sweigert learned that the MEMPHIS MAERSK was underway to the Port of Charleston, that port became the new target of opportunity.  Therefore it may be prudent to reopen the investigation by the U. S. Coast Guard, which…(the rest of the letter is not shown).

The use of the legal phrase “limited purpose public figures” as it relates to defamation liability

Jason Goodman continues to say, “And I think everybody knows the author of this letter is a certain individual who we have depicted in previous shows in a rather comedic political cartoon.  I definitely consider my photographic collages to be political cartoons and when people inject themselves into public discourse that we’re having here, they may be inadvertently be making themselves into limited purpose public figures and when they make certain statements whether that be that it’s their belief that NASA has a colony of slave children on Mars (Goodman is referring to Robert David Steele who has a federal civil defamation lawsuit against him), or commentary on the investigations that you and I are doing, those individuals become defacto limited purpose public figures, not to mention the very act of sending such an alarming letter to the Captain of the Coast Guard here in New York alerting him to a potential bomb hoax threatening his area of command.  I’ve been instructed by the Coast Guard Counterintelligence here in New York that of course a letter like this would automatically trigger an investigation..”

In a similar manner to casually equating Air Force veteran Dave Sweigert with the Canadian Air Force serial killer, Jason Goodman conflates two different men who have filed separate federal civil lawsuits against him.  Without distinguishing by name, he discusses Dave Sweigert and then inserts a remark about a Robert David Steele interview on Infowars, as if they are the acts of the same person.

Goodman adds, “Certainly I knew nothing about,  until Mr. David Sweigert wrote this letter which in and of itself seems like evidence that he has planned this alleged bomb hoax much in the same way I suspect he had something to do with the planning of the alleged dirty bomb hoax on June 14, 2017.… (36.22)  I certainly had nothing to do with the planning of that.  This was information brought to me by a guest on Crowdsource the Truth.  That guest’s being David Sweigert’s brother George-George Webb Sweigert, and George’s associate who is now known to be a former contract FBI informant named Okey Marshall Richards.  Curiously, Mr. Richard’s identity was revealed to us by David Sweigert, so there’s a bizarre connection between all of these individuals sharing this information with me that they now attempt to attribute to me, but of course David, any guest who appears on Crowdsource the Truth and shares their evidence or information, I don’t necessarily agree with them or support them…”.

We do not know the entirety of the Sweigert letter to the Coast Guard, as it was not shown in this video. Based on documents Sweigert has submitted to federal courts, I have to believe that he has exhibits to back his statements. If Sweigert had been involved in the planning of the dirty bomb hoax, why has not Jason Goodman documented the evidence of that connection?  After all, Goodman is the one claiming there IS a connection.

The problem Goodman has is that when George Webb came on CSTT on June 14, 2017, Jason Goodman supported this “live-in” regular co-host/guest’s storyline by actively encouraging his viewers to flood the Coast Guard Twitter account with a dirty bomb warning. Goodman’s warning is reported to have been retweeted 8,000 times. He cannot now backtrack and say he doesn’t necessarily agree with his guest’s opinions, when he actively participated in the dirty bomb hoax by allowing CSTT to publicize this hoax and spread it on the internet via social media. 

In a recent CryptoBeast interview with Queen Tut, she disclosed that she is the source of the discovery of the identity of Deep Uranium.  Thus Dave Sweigert was not the source, but someone who passed along this information in his report on the Port of Charleston incident.

Spoliation of Evidence:  Has Jason Goodman ever sent a “preservation of evidence” letter request to Dave Sweigert?

Near the end of this video (1.03.10), Jason Goodman comments, “…but against this is how we are conducting our investigation; this is crowdsource investigative journalism.  We ask questions, and the vast knowledge of the thousands of people who view our videos helped us get to answers, so it causes me to question the motives David, of people who would seek to stop us from doing that, you’ve spoken quite a bit about Spoliation of Evidence and how it affords us a, what is the word that you use, a presumption of guilt?

David Hawkins responds, (1.03.42)  “An aggressive inference of guilt you see, and, and again I mean this clown Mr. Sweigert, I hope I don’t seem disrespectful, I’m sure he’s got other talents, I just don’t see a lot of them, but why would you put an email address, Spoliation-Notice @ mailbox.com and then send messages to the Coast Guard there’s a hoax when your email address that you’re probably spoliating evidence of a hoax that has been generated by your brother?  Over to you.”

What does Jason Goodman’s commentary on Dave Sweigert’s videos prove?

Jason Goodman in response to David Hawkins:  (1.04.08)  “Or himself.  We don’t know who’s generated the hoax but certainly there is a lot of  evidence that points to him.  One last note on the  spoliation of evidence, David, and I apologize, you, you won’t be able to see this but Mr. Sweigert has also been aggressively spoliating evidence from his own YouTube channel.”

This seems to be Jason Goodman’s Bitchute account where he preserves video evidence on “Crazy Dave”

“He made a video at the Mesa, Arizona post office on December 1, 2018, where it’s my understanding that he presented himself to, with the cooperation of the owner of P. O. Box 152 in that post office- he added himself officially as a recipient of mail at that post office and he’s used that address as his official address of record with the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York, where he’s brought a frivolous lawsuit against me in what I believe is an effort to stop Crowdsource the Truth from moving forward with these types of investigations.”

“So again it raises the question of why does Mr. Sweigert delete this video.  You Tube certainly does not charge to store videos…(1.05.27)  Unless it is some sort of attempt to send a message and then remove it from the internet so that I cannot refer to it in answers to his lawsuits indicating that he is present at the post office on December 1st when I allege he met with the owner of the post office box and conspired with that owner to add himself to the box, which I believe is a furtherance of a fraud on the court…”.

If Jason Goodman presents his opinions without proof, then indeed it will be up to the court to judge whether there is a fraud on the court being committed. I am unable to understand Goodman’s reasoning here without reference to the law which he thinks applies to his accusation.

Back Doors, and all that

David Hawkins, discussing Dave Sweigert as an ethical hacker:  (1.08.31) “…so how do we know that ‘not as smart as he thinks he is’, left a back door into the continuity of government on 911…?

Again Hawkins asks leading questions without having a factual foundation to even hypothesize such a situation.

Speaking of the GHIDRA hacker tool just released to the public, NSA cybersecurity adviser Rob Joyce said, as quoted in the WIRED article, “There’s no backdoor in Ghidra,” he said.  “Come on, no backdoor.  On the record. Scout’s honor.”

Perhaps David Hawkins should investigate the connection between Dave Sweigert and the Boy Scouts…wasn’t he one of those, too?  What kind of badges did he get that led to the 9/11 disaster or the shutdown of the Port of Charleston?  It ought to be easy for Hawkins to get Goodman to swallow THAT TALE, since it is all just part of Crowdsource the Truth investigative journalism.