Through desire a man, having separated himself, seeketh and intermeddleth with all wisdom. Proverbs 18:1
And when they came to Nachon’s threshing floor, Uzzah put forth his hand to the ark of God, and took hold of it; for the oxen shook it. And the anger of the LORD was kindled against Uzzah; and God smote him there for his error; and there he died by the ark of God. 2 Samuel 6:6-7
On May 2, 2014 the Hagmann and Hagmann blogtalk radio show featured a three hour monologue by W, the Intelligence Insider. At the introduction of this broadcast, it was recommended that the listeners review the article written on March 21, 2013 by Doug Hagmann entitled, Life As An Investigator Is Like A Box of Chocolates. Because of the length of the show, and the nuances of the monologue and of the article, this post presumes that the reader is familiar with the content of both messages.
Doug Hagmann introduces W, the Intelligence Insider, as “the real James Bond”, in the recesses and shadows, and mentions the Watergate parking garage, and the taking down of the Soviet Union. W is described as having “integrity and character” and as a “real man’s man”. We are offered no proof of this, nor a list of other credentials, so we hold our breath at the mystery of such a highly esteemed guest.
I then pause the broadcast to read Doug Hagmann’s article, which turns out to be a first person recollection of a narrative given by an anonymous investigator friend who once worked in the realm of physics, presumably at Area 51. This friend of Hagmann is actually W, The Intelligence Insider. He recollects his younger days when he found himself involved in a mysterious set of events. As a result, he discovers that the very wealthy on this planet believe that they have triple strand DNA, rather than the double strand of the less influential humans on earth. Generations of these royal families intermarry among themselves to keep their alien blood “pure”.
W then provides Doug Hagmann with a quippy “law of the investigator”: Belief is the driver of action”. We have heard this very quip stated many times by Doug Hagmann on his radio shows. We are then advised to “Follow the Blood Trail”. Supposedly both the double and the triple stranded DNA has the informational encoding to make ‘good or ‘evil’. In bold lettering the article declares, “Yes, the DNA, and the serpentine creature entangled in it potentially bore the information/knowledge/blueprint to create good or evil!”
We are given a quote from Pellegrini, Powell and Sir Isacc Asimov who penned the”Three Laws of Alien Behavior”: first, their survival will be more important than our survival; second wimps don’t become top dogs; and third, they will assume that the first two laws apply to us.
With all of this sage advice from W, Hagmann in bold letters declares, “It doesn’t really matter what I believe!” It only matters what ‘THEY’ believe,…” referring to this group of “superior alien/humans!”
After all this ungodly doctrine becomes a part of my conscious mind, I venture back to the broadcast to hear the rest of W‘s monologue. I take notes. Doug Hagmann says that he has numerous notebooks filled with notes that he has taken from listening to the Intelligence Insider’s intermeddlings with wisdom. Oops. I inserted my own opinion. I am sure that Hagmann meant W’s sage counsel.
We are never given a title, nor a summary of the thesis of W, at the beginning of his monologue. But we are informed that it has something to do with physics and the history of the mind of the people who run the planet. W acknowledges that the Hagmann show is aimed at Christians. So to stop us from thinking like Christians, he begins by saying that when certain trigger words are heard, the listener tends to tune out the speaker. And what trigger word is he referring to? It is Richard Hoagland. Then he drums into our little minds that dictum: It’s not what you believe: It’s what they believe who run the planet.
So W is going to show us the “driver behind the New World Order.” Well, maybe Mr. W, you are the driver of the NWO limousine. I have examined many a mindset which is different from my own Christian worldview, and never has the Bible instructed me to cut the plumb line of Scripture, so that I cannot accurately measure the variance from truth which underlies the assertions of others.
Since W does not refer to Richard Hoagland at this point in his monologue, we continue to hear a short history of the Pharaoh’s and their after death rituals which were designed to allow their royalty to continue into the next life as gods. He makes reference to the silent hiding of the bones of giants which had been obtained by the Smithsonian, asking “for what purpose” have they been kept hidden? From here we hear the question, “What is consciousness?” and “Where is consciousness?” W discusses near death experiences, some in the body, and some out of the body. As an example, he mentions the use of a remote controlled airplane, with the Controller giving information and direction to a physical object.
Then W moves onto observations which were noted from cloning experiments, pertaining to cloned dogs that had “remembered” the learned commands of the original dog, and not just the instincts encoded in their DNA. From here he ventures into the use of three tools of Science which produce measurable data for study: these are electricity, magnetism, and light. He suggests that these three are facets of the same material, separated out in our observations in the same manner as a prism separates light into colors. W says that the smallest length we can measure is two widths of an electron, and asks, Is that the smallest thing that exists? His point is that there are boundaries to our observations, but that does not mean that the existence of “something else” is not out there, such as Dark Matter, which would be the majority of the universe. He asks whether or not this dark matter has an effect on us, and how one might measure it.
Now as a listener, I have disobeyed W‘s dictum that my beliefs do not matter when considering the driving beliefs of the superior intelligence of aliens. So in my state of resistance, I make a mental note that at no time does W refer to Scripture in his discussion. If Scripture speaks of these aliens, and it does, and the Scriptures cannot be broken, and the God in heaven who is the Creator of us all is our Final Authority, then why not refer to, say, Hebrews 11:3, “Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.” And further in verse 5 it says that “By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.” This verse is an interesting one in relation to our soul and consciousness and the matter of death of the body. Normally we die when our soul (our consciousness which has its own form) which is connected to our body through a silver cord (Ecclesiastes 12:6) is loosed. Are these scriptures, which are truth whether revealed or self-evident, not germain to the discussion of Consciousness?
God says he shall judge our deeds, and that be whether we be in the body, or out of body through our own will power. Gentiles as well as Jews, according to Romans 2:15-16 ” show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another”; and this will be proven “In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.”
The Illuminati are human, because they have the double stranded DNA as the foundation of their physical being; and if something has been added, not through any fault of their own, they still are in a position to be saved; for it does matter what the individual believes regardless of what the powerful royal blue bloods profess. Romans 2:15 teaches that our conscience is not just consciousness, but similar to a scale of balances, weighing everything against a Standard. When you destroy the words of God as Absolute Standard, you sear the conscience, and destroy its ability to rightly judge.
W continues on to argue that Consciousness resides in something more real, denser and more powerful than the human body. That place where Consciousness would be recorded would be Dark Matter according to his hypothesis; our body is but an avatar. At this point he reintroduces that Trigger Word, Richard Hoagland, who he says is not a Christian, but a Scientist. W says that Hoaglund provides evidence, data points, and presents repeatable experiments. And he tells us about Hoaglund’s experiments with an Accutron Watch, which has been taken to certain solar events to establish the presence of a disruption in the torsion field.
At this point, it would be wise for the reader to read a couple of scientifically based arguments against Hoaglund’s “evidence”. As one witty person noted, Hoaglund shoots an arrow at a barn, and then paints a target around the arrow. See Exposing Psuedo Astronomy’s “Properly Designing An Experiment to Measure Richard Hoagland’s Torsion Field, If It Were Real”. See also Richard Hoagland’s FAIL. These are only two articles, written long before W’s monologue, which take to task the unscientific methods of Richard Hoaglund. One of the things which he fails to do in his experiments is to provide base measurements, by which to compare his results. This does not seem to bother W, which is no surprise, for both W and Doug Hagmann encourage us to get rid of the base measurements of Absolute Truth, before we hear or read what they have to say about the agenda of those “superior” aliens. When I looked around the internet for articles in connection with Richard Hoaglund, I also found two complaints of plagiarism against him from real scientists.
Apparently, there is no evidence that anyone anywhere has repeated Richard Hoaglund’s experiments, and isn’t he supposed to be the real deal Scientist according to W? W keeps hinting that he himself writes physics papers, so when I looked for his papers, any paper, on the internet, I wound up on some forum site called BlackNet, where W, as Wayne Willott of Seattle makes comments, like “have to go, something is burning in the lab” and mentioning the technical phrases he uses on his broadcast. Is this just another stage name, or what? Where are his credentials, any credentials, besides that of a Baloney manufacturer? If he were a real physics scientist in a real lab, why does he have to rely on Trigger Words (i.e. Richard Hoagland, etc.) to “prove” his “thesis”. And by the way, what was your thesis Mr. W? I am having a hard time grasping your purposes. Years ago I studied engineering physics taught by a professor who had worked on the Manhattan Project. And somehow with my little mind I understood him. I also understand the Bible references to giants, etc.
At the end of your monologue, there is a slight reference to the salvation of the Christian, and the thought that devils which shortly will have a final judgment are looking for a way of escape among the blessed of humanity. But what were the thoughts and intents of your heart(Hebrews 4:12-13) in providing three hours of fraudulent ungodly reasoning to a Christian audience? Perhaps the dangers inherent in Revelation 13:15-18 regarding the image of the beast and his mark are looming too close to you personally, for it is obvious that you are a highly compromised person, or you would not be hiding behind a façade. Belief is the Driver of Action.