The Brotherhood Buried Alive: Part I of A Book Review of The Most Dangerous Book In The World: 9/11 as Mass Ritual

I am usually busy throughout the day, so often my best reading times are just before sunrise, alone, with a cup of coffee.  So at that dark hour I have been looking over a book by S. K. Bain called The Most Dangerous Book in the World:  9/11 as Mass Ritual.

How did I end up at this end of the spectrum of 9/11? Well, as I moved away from the  Christian Alternative Media, I noted a Doug Hagmann interview of Rebekah Roth which was conducted in April 2017, and from there took a closer look at one of the endorsers of her book, Barbara Honegger, a former Reagan  White House insider.

In the Seattle Truthers’ 9/11 video featuring Honegger,  she lays down a foundational power point at the beginning, referencing the Project for the New American Century’s paper,  Rebuilding America’s Defenses:  Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century.   This rather dull, over generalized, piece of writing, has been presented as a key component in the 9/11 Truthers’ arsenal. It would seem that an argument was presented in 2000 that a new Pearl Harbor was necessary to provide the impetus for a sustained build up of our military.  And in the same manner that the Protocols of Zion  have been presented as “proof” of the Illuminati game plan, so this paper has been put forth as “proof” of the methodology and strategy behind the 9/11 events.

So here is our stopping off point on this journey and why we are going to examine The Most Dangerous Book in the World:  9/11 as Mass Ritual.   On the back cover we read this paragraph linking the author to the PNAC organization:   “S. K. Bain is the former art director of The Weekly Standard magazine, where he worked with William Kristol, Fred Barnes, David Brooks, Tucker Carlson and others for over five years.  During part of that time, the Project for the New American Century shared offices with the publication, and next door was the Philanthropy Roundtable, where Bain art directed for Philanthropy magazine.  The Roundtable at that point was under the leadership of John P. Walters, who went on to become President George W. Bush’s Drug Czar.”

There is a sort of Alice in Wonderland connection between an author who decides to write a book interpreting the occult symbolism of 9/11 as “Mass Ritual”, and the fact that office space was shared with the Project for the New American Century.  And given that the subject matter of 9/11 as a mass ritual  fits in with the underlying motif at Tracking the Leopard Meroz, which is subtitled The Wisdom, Madness and Folly of Satan’s Sacrifices….a book review seems in order.

The Most Dangerous Book in the World-9/11 as Mass Ritual was copyrighted in 2012 and published by Trine Day LLC out of Walterville, OR.  I had previously, in this blog, reviewed another one of their publications, Expendable Elite:  One Soldier’s Journey Into Covert Warfare by Lieutenant Colonel USASF (Ret.) Daniel Marvin. That true story involved the attempted CIA assassination of a Special Forces operation group in Vietnam that refused to take part in an illegal operation.

The Prologue of Bain’s book was written by Peter Levenda in July 2012, and is titled, Knock, Knock in reference to the act of requesting entrance into the meeting places of secret brotherhoods.  He begins, “It was inevitable that this book would be written.  There is, among conspiracy aficionados, a kind of brotherhood. (I use the gender-specific term “brotherhood” deliberately.)  It is a brotherhood buried alive.  What does that mean?”

Levenda says that his use of the term brotherhood is gender specific, meaning it excludes female participants.  So good-bye Rebekah Roth and Barbara Honegger!  We are entering into the male dominated world of conspiracy and occult enthusiasts.

His second paragraph begins, “Imagine a person buried alive”. My mind comes to a complete halt upon reading this,  as back in February 2002 I had a very strange personal experience involving such a scenario.  I was living in Denton, Texas at the time, and one day when I went to Walmart I was overcome with an overwhelming sense of fear in the parking lot.  This same sense of fear hit me on 3 occasions over a week, at that same locality.  I wondered why, as I could not see any rational reason for it.

Across the street from Walmart,  a new shopping center called Denton Crossing was undergoing site preparation.  As it turned out, after huge holes had been unearthed by a bull dozer, a man who was a soil engineer went down to get soil samples as required.  He was buried alive as tons of soil dropped on him, while he was at the bottom of a hole, apparently unnoticed by anyone.   It was a horrific scene to contemplate.  His wife had not known why he had not come home in the evening. As all possible reasons for his disappearance were examined, they began to be haunted by the impossible…and so they dug his lifeless body out of the ground.  What personally struck me was that my sense of horror across the street from this locality did not come after the event, but days before.  I was left wondering what exactly I  had perceived in my spirit.

Levenda,  after saying, “Imagine a person buried alive”, tells the reader,  “Imagine yourself…”. He discusses the ritual and symbolic “slain, burial, and raised again” initiatory programs around the world, but does not mention the case of the life and death of Jesus Christ, who was both man and God, and the only reason why occultists throughout the centuries have attempted through ritual to gain the power of His resurrection by God.

Peter Levenda says  this ritual is “a liminal event:  you are on the threshold of living and dying, and in that sacred spot you can see in both directions”.  Liminal means threshold and refers to that sensory, barely perceptible threshold which is crossed when going through a doorway.  I  presume that “seeing in both directions” is an oblique reference to the initiatory process which turns a double-minded man into a Double Headed Eagle.

At this point I must insert an observation I had made when scanning the first part of this book on 9/11 as a mass ritual.  The author displays 5 full page photos of tarot cards, and when I saw that two of these cards were the same, but from two different decks, my curiosity was piqued.  In order, these cards are:  Tower card 16 from the Rider-Waite deck, Tower card 16 from an unknown deck with the word Trumps across the bottom, Devil card 15, Death card 13, and The Star card 17. The total equals 77,  a number which the author devotes much space to interpreting.

So if the author, S. K. Bain is playing number games with his illustrations,  we ought to be observing where he is incorporating the Tarot into his work in a hidden manner.

And why not see what is not mentioned in the Prologue written by Lavenda using the knock, knock attempt to gain Gnosis by crossing a threshold of a doorway to a secret brotherhood. Oh, that act just happens to be represented by Tarot Card 2.  He also makes comments about the author  which declares Bains to be a 21st century Kabbalist, and of course that would represent Tarot card I, the Magician.

Peter Levenda quotes Robert Anton Wilson on his concept of consensus reality.  But here is an interesting side quote which Wilson had noted in his book, The Historical Illuminatus Chronicles, as being spoken by Sigismundo Celine, saying, “Is”, “is’, “is”–the idiocy of the word haunts me.  If it were abolished, human thought might begin to make sense.  I don’t know what anything “is”, I only know how it seems to me at this moment.

It reminds me of Bill Clinton’s manner of justification for his White House intern tryst…. when he protested, whatever Is is.   It is also of interest that Neuro-linguistic programming is called a Magic Operation by its originators and has as one of its key features, the attempt to eliminate from the human language all references to a state of being.  Out goes words like be, is, am, etc. which reference the existence of something real which was created by the Creator.

We see that this same attitude of rebellion, that of the creature against the Creator, is inherent in this “consensus reality” which Levanda claims is a manmade social contract, the “We obey the laws that are created by other people….”.  There is nothing suggested by Levenda that the foundation of many laws are from the Holy Bible and given for our benefit.  Even the Declaration of Independence acknowledges  natural rights that come from our Creator.   Levanda says that conspiracy theorists have one foot in the world of consensus reality” and the other foot in “the darker mechanisms of reality.  As usual, in this Alternative Truther Universe, reference is made to those who are asleep and those who are awake.

Noting  those persons who go beyond the 9/11 evidence to acknowledge the “transcendental sources of power”, Peter Levenda adds, “This involves studying their texts, their social structures, their stated goals, their secret conclaves, their antinomian beliefs and practices.  One comes face to face with the Occult.  A strange journey, indeed, from a presidential assassination to an interview with the Devil”.

His words are the prologue to a book and so twice, Levenda identifies  the author, S. K. Bain as the 21st century Kabbalist, “we have been waiting for, and this —The Most Dangerous Book in the World—may prove to be his Sepher Yetzir, his Zohar, his Liber 777.  What he is saying is that Bain, as the Magician, has created his own grand grimoire, and I suppose the readers of such are being led down the road of the initiated in the dark arts.

Finally, Peter Levenda concludes, “Whether or not you believe in a conspiracy surrounding 9/11 is not really important.  The nature of Bain’s argument is such you will find your mind expanded by the new possibilities, the arcane possibilities lurking behind political and historical events.  By choosing to see 9/11 as a ritual on a massive scale, we paradoxically may better be able to understand it, to accommodate its message on a psychological –even spiritual–level as we approach the end of 2012 and the birth of a new aeon.”

S. K. Bain thought he had a predictive gift based on his own occult knowledge and could read the future of 2012, the year of the so-called birth of a new aeon.   This fictional predictive work was  called, The Next 9/11?  2012:  Black Christmas, and forms the second half of his book.  In hindsight, he was wrong, but he gets out of being called a false prophet, by calling it fiction. Knowing human nature, we presume that if he had been right, surely he would have triumphed in the level of  his magical skills, and felt himself a prophet.

One last word on Prologue writer,  Peter Levenda, who was accused of being the man behind the pen name Simon who wrote The Gates of the Necronomicon The book is copyrighted under Levenda’s name, as shown above. But he says he is not the author Simon, only the front man.  This is strange business.  See this link for an explanation from Levenda.

Under the Acknowledgements page of the 9//11 as Mass Ritual book, S. K. Bain notes two books on which he bases much of his interpretations.  These are Prophet of Evil:  Aleister Crowley, 9/11 and the New World Order by William Ramsey, and Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare by Michael A. Hoffman II. Overall, Bain has not written a scholarly work,  and so I am dismayed that he lifts so much material from that brilliant researcher and scholar,  Michael Hoffman II.

S. K. Bain has a very bizarre comment in the Acknowledgements page which I quote here:  “Lastly, I would like to express my deepest regrets to Nermal, the “forever kitten,” who didn’t survive the writing process due to a massive failure of patience on the part of the author late one night.  PETA notice: animals were harmed during the production of this work”.  There is a Tarot Card for Sacrifice, only it does not involve cats, but shows a man hanging upside down, as in the photo Bain uses to illustrate the jumpers from the Twin Tower buildings.

In Part II, I will explore Section One, called The Production.

 

 

Mizz Bluebeam Goes To Washington

The purpose of the Third Beam – championed and executed by Barbara Honegger with the enthusiastic support of AE911 Truth core team members…was to break through the media blackout surrounding Building 7’s fall and its censorship by the official 9/11 Commission Report.  As Barbara Honegger pressed the buttons on the high-power spotlights and the Beam ignited the night sky at exactly 9:11 p.m….
ae911truth.org Oct. 8, 2010 article “Third Beam Shines Light On Government and Media Blackout of WTC 7”

In the May 9, 2017 post called Operation Coffee, Tea or Me?,  I wondered why Barbara Honegger, described as a former White House Policy Analyst & Dept. of Defense Sr. Military Affairs journalist 2000-2011,  offered her endorsement of the novel, Methodical Illusion, and the 9/11 theories of its author Rebekah Roth.  Honegger said that what Roth had accomplished  was “cutting the Gordian Knot of two of the most difficult and disturbing unanswered questions of 9/11.”

During the Hagmann Report  interview of Rebekah Roth in April of this year, two comments were made which may shed light on the factors connecting  Roth and Honegger.

The first involved a Synchronistic Moment involving a gas station receipt totaling  $9.11, which Rebekah Roth and her husband declared to be a sign from God that she should include in her novel, a certain detail she had discovered that proved the passengers on the planes had been executed by gassing.   The second statement of Roth which caused The Huh? Factor to spring to life, was when she declared, I died when I was fifteen.  Now I know why I came back.  Because I see puzzles and put them together…”

The bona fides of Honegger, at first glance, are in sharp contrast to the Honegger look-alike Rebekah Roth’s, who had a 32 year career as an airline stewardess, according to her most recent declarations. As I wondered about this sharp disparity,  I took a quick look at a video which featured Barbara Honegger speaking in Seattle on the 9/11 Pentagon attack.  The first few minutes of her presentation was professionally done, with power point projections, and a well organized and articulate delivery, so I was puzzled as to why Honegger thought so highly of the slippery methodology of fiction writer, Rebekah Roth.

As it turns out, Barbara Honegger received her undergraduate degree from Stanford in Creative Writing, and then later got her Masters in Parapsychology from John F. Kennedy University.  So Honegger and Roth share a commonality after all:  creative writing,  and an extreme view on that odd aspect of human life known as synchronicity.  An autobiographical note can be found at The Other Side of Midnight.com, shown below, which expands on these themes:

Autobiographical note on Barbara Honegger at The Other Side of Midnight.com

Barbara Honegger came from a family that provided her with worthy examples of accomplishments.  Both parents went to Stanford. Her father, William Beverly Honegger, went to Naval Officer Training School in Evanston, IL, and he was “part of the Northern Pacific fleet at Iwo Jima and an officer on a destroyer escort that sailed into Tokyo Bay for the surrender of Japan.” Barbara also went to Stanford, was associated later with the Hoover Institution, and became a military affairs journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School, which has been described as the premier science, technology and national security affairs graduate research university of the Department of Defense.

During the time when Ms. Honegger worked at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, doing research for Dr. Martin Anderson, he became the Chief Domestic Policy Advisor for President Reagan. Dr. Anderson brought Barbara with him to Washington D.C.;  therefore situating her responsibilities and influence within the inner sanctum of the White House.

Barbara Honegger’s theories of 9/11 have been discussed in detail by various persons and published online.  What I want to focus on at this moment is a 2 minute segment of a 3 hour video highlighting the speech given by Barbara Honegger at a 9/11 Truth Conference, (published May 13, 2013) in a video entitled, 9/11 Pentagon Attack-Behind the Smoke Curtain.

At the 22.50 mark of this video, Barbara Honegger says, “To succeed, the real inside job 9/11 Psy-Op required a critical mass of innocent deaths.  Believe it or not, after the World Trade Center attack in 1993 that killed, I believe ,5 people and injured about 1,000, Federal Agents were heard to say by reporter Steven Emerson, that “there had not been enough deaths this time”.  After the 1993 World Trade Center attacks, also most people don’t know this, but the World Trade Center Towers roof doors were locked, ordered locked, by official New York City policy.  So that on 9/11,  it happened because of that, that the innocent victims above the impact zone were trapped, terrorized, and killed.  They had no way to escape except to jump.  The New York Times published, I believe, that 105 victims had gotten right up to the door, where in 1993 they did, were able to go up onto the roof; but they were blocked.  Also, after the impacts and before the towers fell, dozens of military and civilian helicopters self-dispatched.  Wonderful people from the military started flying toward the NY city intending to rescue survivors from the towers to risk their lives in their helicopters.  There were ordered to go to a nearby military base so that they could not respond.”(24.20)

It is obvious to most inquirers into the events of  9/11, that the attacks were planned and carried out by those who had the motive, means and opportunity to carry out  a very  sophisticated assault. But it matters not whether you believe that these attacks were carried out by Muslim hijackers, the United States Government,  or Israeli Special Ops, those involved have blood dripping from their hands which cries out to God for justice.

When it comes to blood guilt,   Barbara Honegger makes an interesting assertion:  she claims that a Psy-Op requires a Critical Mass of Innocent Deaths.  The phrase critical mass is taken from  nuclear physics, and refers to the “smallest amount of fissile material needed for a sustained nuclear chain reaction”.  So what Honneger is suggesting is that there is a minimum number of innocent deaths that must occur, for the desired psychological chain reaction of a Psy-Op to sustain itself.

Quoting Steven Emerson on the critical mass of innocent deaths, Honegger argues that the matter of whether the WTC roof top doors were locked or not, was a significant factor in the differences of the number of persons killed on 9/11 as compared to the 1993 attack.  However, in  1993 while there were some persons rescued from the WTC roof level; the bombs had gone off in the basement, which allowed most everyone to escape.  It was thought later that those who had fled to the roof, had in reality the option of walking down to safety via the stairwells.

The general consensus of many 9/11 commentators, was that the locked roof top doors on 9/11 was a moot point, as within a very short time the smoke conditions atop the roofs made helicopter rescues an impossibility.It is curious that Honegger would target the policy of keeping the WTC  roof doors locked as proof that there was a deliberate attempt to ensure that a maximum number of innocent deaths would occur on 9/11. The smoke of the fires burning at the impact level effectively nullified all attempts to escape alive.

What the tragic and horrific end of those who were trapped on the highest floors symbolizes is Tarot Card 16, which displays a burning tower with no escape for those at the top, except to jump to their deaths.

The concept of blood sacrifice and that of blood guilt, is a fundamental concept in the Bible.  Likewise, we know that Satan is interested in blood sacrifices, as a means of empowering his own form of government.

I am going to switch your focus for a moment from the critical mass of  the 9/11 deaths to another form of blood sacrifice which Barbara Honegger had been highly interested in during the Reagan years. As a  policy advisor to President Reagan on women’s rights, Honegger wrote a white paper with the purpose of  getting all legal restraints lifted from that form of blood sacrifice called abortion.

On  December 2, 2015, Guns And Butter host  Bonnie Faulkner interviewed Barbara Honegger for a show called, We the Men vs. We the People: Reframing the Abortion Issue to Prevent Violent Escalation of The Culture War. (This link also provides a transcript of this very excellent interview, if you want to read the entire context of the sections which I am going to comment on.)

In the Introduction of this Guns and Butter interview by Bonnie Faulkner, Barbara Honegger is quoted as saying:Reading the above quotation, we must remember that abortion is an act that is performed on a woman to remove a fetus from her body’s uterus. The woman undergoing this procedure, had in most cases consented to intercourse with a man.  The uterus at no time has the power to consent or decline sexual relations between the woman and the man. Abortion represents a blood sacrifice of an innocent fetus, which if it were allowed to develop, will become a fully developed human being. In many such situations, the blood guilt falls on more than one person; often the man, family members or friends have exerted pressure on the woman,  resulting in this tragic outcome of abortion.

Barbara Honegger introduces in her White Paper  on abortion, an argument based on  a dissimilar court case.  This particular case involved a plaintiff who needed a life saving bone marrow transplant who tried to legally force his cousin, who was a compatible donor, into undergoing extraction of his  bone marrow without the donor’s consent.  Interestingly, the main argument which the plaintiff made came from Roe v. Wade!

Barbara Honegger says that the third trimester portion of this famous abortion case, “is the only  part of Roe v. Wade that gives an exception to the otherwise almost absolute right under Roe v. Wade of a pregnant woman to end her pregnancy.  In the third trimester of Roe v. Wade she’s not allowed to under all circumstances-only to save her own health.”

Barbara Honegger tells Guns and Butter host, Bonnie Faulkner, the following:

In the above quote, Honegger refers to her white paper argument as a paradigm shift.  Now this is interesting, because as a policy advisor to the White House, she was in a position of influence which potentially could cause a major shift in the a priori definition of abortion; that it is a medical procedure done on a woman in order to terminate the life of a fetus. It is difficult for me to see that the facts of the organ transplant donation lawsuit represent the same boundaries of consent which are found in the normal abortion case.  If we consider the most common case of abortion, which involves a woman who has granted a man access to her body in an consensual sex act, she, as well as the man, were voluntarily risking  conception.

Barbara Honegger’s attempt to cause a paradigm shift in how we think of abortion, would appear to be a means of redefining terms so as to eliminate blood guilt.

Compare what Barbara Honegger did in attributing 9/11 blood guilt to those who were responsible for preventing access to the roof tops of two 110 story skyscrapers, with her attempt to eliminate the blood guilt in abortion.

At the heart of the matter of the problem of fire escapes in tall buildings is that the architects have limited by design, options which might conceivably have been built into the outside of the structure to allow persons to escape fires which had cut off the inner stairwells. Rescuing persons from the top of a 110 story building is difficult enough, without having to contend with the rising smoke from a major fire. The fact that present day fire evacuation plans for high rises does not meet the ideal goal, does not necessarily mean that those who are involved in policy making had evil intentions.

As a reminder of Honegger’s presentation on this matter, see the screenshot below referring to the success of the 9/11 Psy-Op as requiring a Critical Mass Of Innocent Deaths.In contrast to her harsh judgment on the motives of persons in the WTC fire escape plans, Barbara Honegger showed no such similar strictness in her white paper  on abortion.  In fact, her motive was to  create an air tight legal argument for justifying the act of taking the life of an innocent fetus. She seems rather pleased by her clever sophistry which results in a paradigm shift in thinking.  Is not the effecting of a paradigm shift the exact same thing as what we call a Psy-Op?You see, deep in the human heart, we know that we have to give an account one day of our deeds, whether we believe in God or not.  That is the fundamental reason why you will find that the orchestrated blood sacrifices of innocents which undergird Psy-Ops, also involves a clever web of sophistry, lies, and faulty arguments to justify their own blood guilt.

At first we were told that the Twin Towers were hit by commercial jets, then by missiles, then by holograms. Something is being reframed.  Barbara Honegger, through her family connections, gets a degree from Stanford University in creative writing, then a Masters in Parapsychology, becomes a research assistant which allows the ultra feminist Mizz Bluebeam to go to Washington D.C. to create an argument which would eliminate the guilt of the blood sacrifice of innocent newly conceived humans in the womb of their “Mother”.

What is at the end of the World Trade Center’s Trinity of Blue beams? As I understand it, it was Barbara Honegger who was responsible for getting the third beam authorized.  Might it have something to do with that other project known as Blue Beam?One wonders what Critical Mass of innocent deaths will have to be reached, for that event to occur, and whether the mounting count of abortions done in America since the 1960’s are reaching the sustained nuclear reaction stage of a Psy-Op which is more horrific than 9/11.