Threatenings of a Lawsuit while sidestepping the “V” liability – the ever present danger in all of this

“But because a, a, a group of people who started coming against Doug and I, that we basically responded as in hyperbole, the thing is that we’ve been forced to fight a 30 month battle against people who have libeled us, who have slandered us, who have defamed us, who have been involved in tortious interference in our businesses, who have done their best to get you know literally thousands of pages on the internet….It doesn’t matter if you live in Taiwan, doesn’t matter whether if you have a dual citizenship, Mexico, the United States, doesn’t matter if you live in Mississippi, doesn’t matter if you live in Canada, doesn’t matter if you live in Alabama or Georgia or anyplace else, we are absolutely putting you on notice.  You will get to write the checks for your defense,…”  Steve Quayle on the 329 2018 Hagmann Report

The first I had heard that Steve Quayle and Doug Hagmann were preparing a retaliation lawsuit against their naysayers was on January 12, 2017 when John Little of Omega Shock had written a follow-up to his previous article on V the Guerrilla Economist. In this screenshot we see a reference to named protagonists, which I assume includes this blog as one of my articles had been linked, and we see in the most recent Quayle “notice” that Mississippi is included, where I live.

On the February 28, 2018 Hagmann Report “Saddle for Battle Censorship Salvos are FlyingDoug Hagmann in an interview with Steve Quayle asked for donations from his wealthy listeners to finance a legal team to sue someone who has engaged in a “coordinated attack” against them.  I do not know of any “coordinated attack”, and what must be remembered is that the defamation lawsuit in which Hagmann and Quayle are defendants, has only one plaintiff; a Canadian investigative journalist who has written a few books, who is representing herself, Pro Se. She filed the defamation lawsuit to protect her professional reputation as a journalist.

Now one of the things I have observed with great amazement is that Steve Quayle  goes into panic mode whenever he discusses the disabled, housebound senior citizen woman in Michigan who bought $51,000 worth of silver coins and long-term storage food from his businesses in mid 2012. I have never met her, but we have exchanged emails and a few phone calls, and I have found her to be intelligent, funny, devoted to prayer, and very candid about the fact that she was at a very low emotional point in her life a few years ago. So how is this Christian woman a threat to a successful businessman who has his own security people, wealthy donors and millions of followers?  As we shall see, I believe  the trigger word is V-the Guerrilla Economist.

I am going to touch on just a couple of points today in regard to a six-minute segment of The Hagmann Report YouTube video published March 30, 2018 called Steve & Tyler Quayle -329 2018-  Prophecy Unfolding.  I have made an unofficial transcription of the audio from the 54.15-1.04 mark.   This small segment of the video begins with Tyler Quayle, the son and employee of Steve Quayle, who is winding up his interview. But note his strange assertions about Christians in America. Considering that his father has stated that he does not attend a local church, and has not for years, I do not know if Tyler has any real experiences with local church congregations.  After this,  Steve Quayle takes center stage to ask for donations from his wealthy listeners to finance a future, highly expensive, retributive lawsuit against apparently anyone who has disagreed with him.

Any bolding in the transcription below is mine, for purposes of commentary.

Tyler Quayle (54.15) …I feel like that the only way the church in America will get it is when there’s nothing on television anymore, or they can’t get their Xanax on time, like something has to interrupt the supply of pharmaceuticals, I think once that happens a lot of people will wake up.

Joe Hagmann: It’s a great point. It’s a great point and it’s probably more accurate than not.

Tyler Quayle: Well, I mean think about it, I mean I was half-joking, but if you had an event that shut down the distribution centers, how many people are on, uh antipsychotic, anti-anxiety, if they, if that supply chain broke down for 30 to 90 days, I mean you’re gonna have a little bit of a walking dead situation with people who are, you know, zombie like.

Doug Hagmann: Yeah, precisely right and I’ll tell you folks so you just heard uh, uh, Tyler and of course Steve Quayle, but, but in his son Tyler together what a, what a dynamic father/son team. I mean it’s tremendous and I’m, I’m so, I’m blessed and I know Joe feels the same way, and we are so blessed to uh just to have met you, have met, even spoken with you, but Steve and Tyler, thank you so very, very much for your time tonight.

Tyler Quayle: Thank you, Doug, thank you Joe, very much.

Doug Hagmann: Good talking to you, thank you! Folks…

Tyler Quayle: Hope to do it again. God bless.

Doug Hagmann: You’re, you’re always welcome. We’re going to be right back after this network break. Steve Quayle remaining to discuss a number of important issues. Stay where you’re at. (55.52)

(Network Break)

Doug Hagmann: (55.56) Steve Quayle, thank you so much for holding over.

Steve Quayle: Hey, Doug. Just give me a second. I have my security people just checking right now; they just knocked on the door, so just continue talking for 30 seconds.

Doug Hagmann: Sure, no worries at all. See this is what happens by the way, and, and you know it’s interesting, I had a conversation, you know that uh you know uh the first hour, John, you and I know what we’re talking about, security or surveillance, there’s over (overtalk by Joe)… and we’ve, we took, we’ve been on both ends of that. We’ve been subjected to and have been, conducted surveillance, and it’s interesting because you, when you’re in the world of surveillance, there will be companies, there will be people, there will be interests, who will attempt to hire you and say, “I just want to make sure that they see you in the morning and they see you at night.” Hopefully Steve, everything’s all right on your end.

Steve Quayle: Yeah, yeah, I mean here’s the thing you know and I have great security people and obviously you know Doug, I think people got to understand, you and I have lived under a cloud of lies, allegations and I want to give some legal terms to some people. We have had affidavits filed against us, and lawsuit we’re filing, which is spurious, it has no legal merit, but we’re in the six figures, ladies and gentlemen, and we’re willing to fight for you– not just ourselves- because I want people to put, before I even begin going a hundred miles an hour, I want people to understand some, I want you, everyone who has ever been blessed by hearing me anyplace, by hearing Doug any place, by being able to turn into Hagmann and Hagmann and hear from Tom Horn, all the amazing guests, hear Pastor Lankford.

I want you to ask yourself where will you go for the continual nourishment that God and His mercy has provided. Now look, I don’t care if people say I’m bat manure crazy. I don’t care what they say and obviously I know everybody’s not going to love me, but when they accuse Doug and I of money laundering, that is libel per se, OK? And libel per se is anything that charges any person with a crime or having been indicted, convicted or punished for a crime. We have not been.

When somebody accuses you in an affidavit in court and another person has an affidavit making her claims that I was taking advantage of a bipolar woman and that I cheated her when she bought silver, and got mad when it went down and claimed that it was because she listens to Viji the Guerrilla Economist talking to Doug and I and listen ladies and gentlemen, Viji didn’t come on until a year after she bought her silver. That woman filed an affidavit with both the state of Michigan and Montana, they said you have no legal merit, there’s nothing to the case.

Tracking the Leopard Meroz commentary: There are several fact benders stated here, but let’s just deal with one of those in greater depth.  Steve Quayle states in this video that V the Guerrilla Economist (Viji Varghese) “did not come on until a year after she bought her silver”.  He is referring to V’s appearance as a guest on the Hagmann show.    But what the affidavit states in point 14, is that To substantiate his dire warnings Mr. Quayle read on The Hagmann and Hagmann Report emails he claimed he received from a high-level international banking insider, and a broker, he called, “V”, he published on his website,  ‘V” was warning people to follow Mr. Quayle’s advice to get out of “paper” currency, as a fellow Christian”.

I have seen substantiation that at least one of those V emails was read on the Hagmann Report in mid June of 2012, when this buyer contacted Steve Quayle about purchasing silver and food from him. Steve Quayle is attempting to divert attention away from V the Guerrilla Economist’s  2012 influence, to a later time period in 2013.  In reality, V was in fact highly “visible” and influential in 2012 through the printed word on the internet, even though he did not become an interviewed guest on the Hagmann show until  January of 2013.

On that particular Hagmann show, Steve Quayle stated, “Tonight is a special treat because we have got one of the most accurate financial insiders I have ever had the privilege to know.  A lot of people Doug have been listening to him by way of his email and reading his emails but listening to the news that V has so appropriately warned everybody ahead of time;  that just to fill you in on his bona fides without obviously causing too much of a shock, he is probably one of the most well-known commodities traders in strategic metals.  He has worked for major (?) firms, also worked for the largest bank in the world, and if you know anything about the largest banks you don’t get to be the head of trading desks and all this stuff unless you know what you are doing.  His accuracy is prescient…..” .

Viji Varghese aka V the Guerrilla Economist later was revealed to be a fraud. He did not possess the securities industry credentials which require one to be licensed, and his resume was false. He has been reported to the Royal Bank of Scotland regarding his false resume, the IRS and FINRA, and pages of documentation were submitted as evidence.

What the record shows about V the Guerrilla Economist is that he first emailed Steve Quayle on March 12, 2012. The affidavit submitted to the court by the woman purchaser of silver states that she had contacted Steve Quayle at his Renaissance Metals business in Bozeman, Montana in June of 2012, and after several phone calls and emails sent him a check for $51,117.83 dated July 6, 2012.

So let’s go back in time to April 2012 and work our way through June 2012, and beyond,  via our own scrapbooks, to see what might have influenced a person to buy silver and long-term storage food from Steve Quayle.

Here is an April 13, 2012 message from Douglas Hagmann to advertise his special two-hour interview with Steve Quayle on what he expects to happen that summer, including the prospects of martial law.

Here is another screen shot dated 3 weeks later on May 5, 2012 taken from The News Unit website.

On May 10, 2012, The News Unit did an update on Steve Quayle’s warnings as shown in their article linked here.  Take the time to read this screenshot and see the style of advertising which Quayle had presented in order to sell merchandise.So proceeding forward on the 2012 timeline to the month of June when a listener of Steve Quayle became so concerned about warnings of imminent disaster that she contacted Steve Quayle, we read V’s  sixth email of June 7, 2012 in which Quayle directly asks V a question.

All of the V emails had been posted  at on his QAlert page. Below I have displayed the first two paragraphs of the June 11, 2012  (seventh) email from V, which authoritatively warns that Steve’s listeners ought to get their cash out of banks NOW, and to buy physical silver and gold no matter what “spot price” is.

In light of the false credentials of Viji Varghese as V the Guerrilla Economist, note that there are several problems with his modus operandi, including his alarmist type of  “crying fire in a crowded theater”.  If  multitudes of listeners had acted to remove their cash from banks NOW, a run on our banks would have occurred. This entire panic scenario was fabricated, and another end result of people rushing out en masse to buy silver and gold, would be to drive the price up. And Steve Quayle is a gold and silver merchandiser.  On June 14, 2012 posted this on their website linked here. Note that “Steve Quayle had taken the unprecedented step to place his entire website under a red screen/red alert.”  As I understand it, Steve Quayle had advised his readers and listeners that once he knew from his insider sources that everything was going down, he would post a red screen alert on his website, so that others could “bug out” and go into their bunker and hiding places.  

On July 2, 2012, four days before the retired, disabled, living alone, frightened woman, had written Quayle a check for $51,117.83, posted under “Prophetic Enews from the Desk of Charles Wheeling” an article written by Steve Quayle on June 28, 2012 entitled, “What’s Really Going on in the Multi-billion dollar Bank Hacking World”.

The screen shot is shown below:

So let’s continue reading what Steve Quayle had to say on The Hagmann Report on March 29, 2018.  He continues to berate his 2012 Michigan customer whose fears had been greatly magnified by the false reports which were published by Steve Quayle and V the Guerrilla Economist.   Note his complete lack of Christian compassion, as well as his misrepresentation of the context in which this 2012 transaction took place, as he considers her psychological status at that point in time to be an exonerating factor of his own words and actions.

Steve Quayle:  She then went on in her own words, I think Doug, what are there, at least 12 to 18 references where she claims after the fact that she basically was crazy that her kids, here’s, here’s a direct quote, “Mom”, I’m not gonna name her you know, it’s a public record, “Mom, I’m very concerned with your mental health, you are not yourself and are exhibiting many of the classic symptoms of a manic episode, I mean this with utter sincerity, please go to the hospital and get help.” That’s a woman that said I was, you know, dishonest and I stole from her. She got everything she wanted. She got everything she agreed to.

She had Buyer’s Remorse and I went from being her favorite person on the planet, ladies and gentlemen, when Doug said we have assembled and continue to assemble a team of legal experts, we have voluminous amounts of documentation and some of you people that hang out on whatever boards, you know the boards that proscribe us or the boards that you know, people aren’t allowed to mention us openly but they do in their bomb shelter and stuff; all of those are memorialized also.

Tracking the Leopard Meroz commentary:  The Prudent Man Rule is the primary investment guideline governing fiduciary related transactions.  And it encompasses basic wisdom when it comes to handling our own assets, for one of the things a prudent man does is diversify his assets in order to spread out risk.  In common terms, this is the adage of “don’t put all your eggs into one basket.” 

The warnings given by Steve Quayle and V-the Guerrilla Economist during 2012 violated the common sense rule of the Prudent Man when they created a panic situation based on falsehoods that attempted to provoke their Christian listeners to place most of their cash into metals. When their proclaimed “crisis” disappeared like a morning mist, those who had a portfolio largely of metals did not have much liquidity. And those panic transactions could not be reversed without losing value. 

Who stood to gain from this panic situation?  Simply it was those who were sellers of gold and silver and long term storage food and other emergency items. 

There was no excuse for the Hagmann “premier father and son investigative team” and for Steve Quayle, successful businessman, to not vet V’s credentials.  Thus both of these men are legally responsible for promoting the fraudulent  V the Guerrilla Economist into a position of public trust, in conjunction with their businesses.

And while we are at it, do not forget that Hagmann’s trusted friend,  Wayne Willot aka W the Intelligence Insider,  became a regular guest on V’s shows later!   When both V and W the Intelligence Insider parted ways with Hagmann and Quayle, the public was not advised that V’s credentials were fraudulent. In fact there was Silence on this matter, as if a nondisclosure agreement had been signed.

If Quayle and Hagmann want to sue those who tried to warn others about these facts, you can rest assured that the documentation on V will also show up in the court record, and discovery  may reveal what really went on behind the scenes. It might be interesting for a start to request certified copies of the bank statements of both Quayle and V to find out if they had closed down their own accounts, as they had advised others to do.   

So did this woman who filed an affidavit with the court have “Buyer’s Remorse”?  You bet she did, after she recovered from the severe emotional state of fear she had been in. As a Christian, she accepted the fact that she had made a wrong decision, and took responsibility for it. 

When she went to the states of Montana and Michigan and attempted to enlist the help of their consumer protection divisions, she was not asking for compensation, but in my opinion. was attempting to get a government agency to understand that the form which the fear propaganda took, had been the foundation for fraudulent activity. This latter explanation is my own, and I am not quoting her words.  One of the things to remember is that all government agencies have limited budgets and have a limited scope of responsibility; thus it is often difficult for the average citizen to know who to go to, to address complex issues involving consumer protection.

As a side note of interest, this week I picked up a new term from Dave Acton’s You Tube channel.  I thought the definition of Cognitive threats provides insight into another aspect of the Alternative Media’s motive for its continual promotion of a crisis mentality.Under the subheading of Maturing of Attack Tools by Threat Actors, Dave Acton’s draft report says that “Cognitive (mind) threats are a type of social engineering attack that demands immediate action based on a perceived crisis (always based on deception).”

Thinking back on 2012- the year of the end of the Mayan calendar, and comparing it to  other crisis scenarios like the Y2K crisis, etc. promoted by Alternative News radio hosts, one has to ask if there is a hidden agenda of “social engineering” that is one of the factors behind these money making schemes.  Certainly one effect of these hoax crisis situations is to influence Christians to replace their faith in God, and their common sense, with a God forsaken sense of fear.

Steve Quayle:  Now, ladies and gentlemen (1.00.00) we’re not just fighting for us, we’re fighting for you. And the legal team, we’ve got is one of the best in the country and they’re going to be expensive. It’s going to cost us high in the six figures but what, what we’ve been able to do is piece this whole thing together and look that’s nothing compared to what the left has, so I want you to understand something that they have tried in their best to trade libel.

Trade libel is defamation against the goods or services of a company or business. They’ve done it Doug, they’ve done it to me. There are people that go on bulletin boards and, and forums etc. and just continue to parrot false claims. Even a guy that was a radio host wanted to get a class action suit against me. Guess what? He ended up in jail; and he’s not off the hook. Another individual who uh, uh, basically made public claims and it’s memorialized that I sold fake bullion. He then retracted it. That’s a crime ladies and gentlemen.

Tracking the Leopard Meroz commentary:  Trade Libel?  Here is a teaser article from the on Trade libel, with an excerpt:

Kelly/Warner summarizes 3 points of libel law:Here is an example of Trade Libel which I have taken from the second part of the  June 14, 2012 article linked earlier, called RED ALERT from International Banker:  Euro has collapsed!  It is from a V email to Steve Quayle.RBS is the Royal Bank of Scotland which V claimed to work for, but in fact did not. Because he has falsified his credentials, he is lying when he says he has insider information.  Note he also names Credit Sussie and is giving out false information on which he tells Steve to tell his listeners to pull out of their bank accounts because the Euro has collapsed.  Take a look at those 3 points of trade libel again, and see how they apply to V’s email which was published by Steve Quayle. in their article on trade libel states, “The standard of defamation elements generally apply to businesses in that the content at issue must be a statement of fact that is provably false that causes financial harm or harm to reputational interests and the author was at least negligent or careless in its research of the true facts prior to posting the material online.”

What Quayle and V were proclaiming against the banking industry was defamation against their reputations involving massive falsehoods.  It also involved the incitement of bank customers into immediately pulling out their cash; a mass panic would  have created a run on banks.  And now Quayle is accusing others of committing trade libel against their businesses? 

Oh, and by the way,  when Quayle brings up Pete Santilli, the radio host who was interested to know if there were others willing to come forward for a class action suit; -his time in jail had nothing to do with Quayle, but was the result of his physical presence at the Oregon Standoff situation.

Steve Quayle:  That is not only libel, it’s injurious but it’s also a crime. So what Doug and I are having to do obviously is you know that all talk radio is under attack with the demonetization by YouTube, with the demonetization of advertising, with advertisers pulling away. We have to appeal to those of you who can afford to help us and I’m saying that for the legal challenge we’re going to make, when I say we’ve got some of the brightest legal minds of the world, we’ve got a guy who started a law school, wrote the law book, and is respected in the country, he’s a Constitutional authority. Now this guy you know these guys have, how do I say, the firm has taken stuff to the Supreme Court.

But because a, a, a group of people who started coming against Doug and I, that we basically responded as in hyperbole, the thing is that we’ve been forced to fight a 30 month battle against people who have libeled us, who have slandered us, who have defamed us, who have been involved in tortious interference in our businesses, who have done their best to get you know literally thousands of pages on the internet. One lies, another one swears to it, and everybody says yep we told you these guys are that; we’ve had enough.

Tracking the Leopard Meroz commentary A group of people?  Your Joint Response on February 10, 2015 named only two persons.  Only one person is the plaintiff in the defamation lawsuit against Quayle and Hagmann. 

Steve Quayle:  We kept silent. Obviously our case is in court but I want to share something. It doesn’t matter if you live in Taiwan, doesn’t matter whether if you have a dual citizenship, Mexico, the United States, doesn’t matter if you live in Mississippi, doesn’t matter if you live in Canada, doesn’t matter if you live in Alabama or Georgia or anyplace else, we are absolutely putting you on notice.

You will get to write the checks for your defense, and you can’t say well na nanny nanna there’s also libel per se, there is a false light claim when you take something as factual that is knowingly not true and you go out and blab it while you’re knitting your uh you know whatever your blanket or your what do they call shawls or whatever and you can just bet on it that you can’t claim “well, I didn’t know any better”.

Tracking the Leopard Meroz commentary:  What is with the childish na nanny nanna taunt?  And why is Quayle so obsessed with that one disabled Michigan woman who wrote an affidavit?  Now he is attacking her talent of being an excellent knitter who generously makes gifts for other people.

Contrary to Doug Hagmann’s prior characterization of someone in Mississippi who knits,  I do not knit.  But I do live in Mississippi, and I have written Christian commentaries on various persons in the  Alternative Media, so I guess I have been put on notice for who knows what It is not defamation to speak the truth.  

I see that Quayle likes to project his own sins onto others:  how about this one, “when you take something as factual that is knowingly not true and you go out and blab it.” Hahahahahaha!  That fits Quayle to a V!

Steve Quayle and Douglas Hagmann are attempting to set up a legal team to take vengeance against anyone who opposed their false narratives over the past few years, and he wants to ruin them financially. He is not talking about suing deep pocket corporations and wealthy persons, because he has not addressed that group in any detail.    He wants to sue individuals who tried to warn others about their fear propaganda and he does not have the guts to name them, because if he did, it might cause his listeners to read what those persons have written on the internet.

In all of this, the  Christian Alternative Media is noted for expecting that its listeners obey them without question, accept their statements without doing any research and analysis, and to substitute studying the Bible for themselves by following men who claim to be anointed Watchmen of God.  

Quayle and Hagmann  hope their wealthy listeners will finance their cause, because they are doing it for you, not just themselves.  They are certainly not doing it for the sake of Jesus Christ, as the effects of all this fear propaganda over the years has been detrimental to the blood bought church of Christ. Here is a sample testimony of someone who claimed to be a missionary to the Philippines who wrote to Steve Quayle about the edification of the church.

Steve Quayle:  So ladies and gentlemen, it’s not just this, they’re trying to shut Alex up. Remember this when the most powerful people in the world want you dead, you’re over target and little by little we’re being picked off, so it’s not just Doug and me fighting a lawsuit, it is absolutely the lawsuit, it is a bigger picture. The bigger picture is again and Doug I don’t know how to say this anymore clearly, the bigger picture is can you ultimately face the fact and it will come just as if Trump was an intermission and I believe he was you know people get more mad at that than they want nuclear war and there’s a Scripture that says, woe unto you who long for the day of the Lord…(1.03.59)

Tracking the Leopard Meroz commentary It must be remembered that one of the persons who appears to be targeted by the up and coming Legal Team is the man who exposed the false credentials and false resume of V.  Others have written and made videos to warn Christians about the falsehoods published on the Alternative Media.  None of these persons are the most powerful people in the world.  And as regards the REAL most powerful people in the world, why would they want Steve Quayle or Doug Hagmann dead? 

Even when it comes to Alex Jones, much of his YouTube striking problems stem from his battle with his ex wife over the custody of their three children. But, oh wait!  The Sandy Hook families  are now suing Alex Jones and Infowars for declaring that the Sandy Hook incident was a hoax. Perhaps Americans are tiring of being socially engineered by Alternative Media radio hosts and their guests.

Should those persons who are being targeted by Steve Quayle and Doug Hagmann for a lawsuit be concerned?  Or is this “notice”  just a means of intimidation to silence the free speech of ordinary Christians who speak out against wrongdoing?

The Legal Team that wants its money up front might be in for a surprise, if it decides to sue a number of Pro Se Christian defendants with a little common sense, and God on their side.





FYI: Robert David Steele Lawsuit Updates

The three documents recently submitted to the court:

4/11/2018 Document 38 Order that the Court grants 36 Motion to Amend.  To the extent necessary the Court Denies as Moot Negron’s 21 Motion to dismiss.

linked here:   rds 411 2018 doc 38

4/13/2018 Document 39 Amended Complaint against all defendants, filed by RDS
linked here:  rds 413 2018 doc 39

4/17/2018 Document 40 Proposed Summons re 39 Amended Complaint (Request for Issuance of Summons to Susan A. Lutzke) by Robert David Steele

linked here:  rds 417 2018 doc 40



The Amending of a Lawsuit to include Susan (Holmes) Lutzke, as Queen Tut

Queen Tut, who was named as one of three defendants in a defamation lawsuit filed by Robert David Steele, has presented the plaintiff with the very real problem of accurately identifying her legal name and location. It is now generally believed that Susan Lutzke aka Susan Holmes of Fort Collins, Colorado is the voice of the woman who Steele had attempted to obtain a default judgment against.  However, the fact that it was Carla A. Howell’s name on the lawsuit as Queen Tut, rather than Susan Lutzke’s, caused the Judge to rule against that motion.

On March 25, 2018, the Plaintiffs’ attorney Steven S. Biss filed a Motion For Leave to File Amended Complaint with the Federal Civil Court. This Motion addresses, first of all, the correction which was needed on the lawsuit title which is now proposed to be Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network v. Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron and Susan A. Lutzke a/k/a/ “Queen Tut”.

Secondly, this lawsuit is one in which the Plaintiffs are demanding a trial by jury, and the amount of “compensatory damages, statutory damages (three-fold the damages sustained), and punitive damages” has now been proposed to be increased from $15,350,000.00 to $18,350,000.00.

The complaint has been expanded to read “defamation per se, insulting words, business conspiracy, common-law conspiracy, tortious interference with contract and business expectancies, intentional affliction of emotional distress, personal trespass by computer and computer harassment, and unauthorized use of name and picture.” These last phrases, which I have emphasized, are the additions made to the original complaint. The proposed amended complaint has been expanded from 37 pages to about 99, to include supporting examples of words and actions taken by the defendants in the months following the filing of the original complaint on September 1, 2017.

The Introduction to the proposed Amended Complaint provides several new observations of interest noting the Defendants’ “egregious disrespect for the law is eclipsed only by their actual malice and desire to injure the Plaintiffs.”  The concluding sentence states, “This case presents a new age of defamation and a unique breed of lawless and malicious conduct.”  To read the proposed amendment, click on this link:  rds lawsuit 325 2018 motion to amend complaint

While it is well known that I do not favor Robert David Steele because his political and religious views greatly differ from my own, neither have I supported any of the defendant’s words and actions by which they have introduced questionable information into the public domain. My sympathies in this legal matter are strictly reserved for the Judge who must sort through the arguments and evidence presented by both sides, and determine if this case should proceed to a trial by jury.

My continuing interest in this legal dispute stems from my concern for several trends which I see in American society, including the lowering of the quality of public discourse on the various internet platforms, the constant stating of accusations against others without providing any supporting evidence, and the use of anonymous names which promote a sense of safety for those who spread lies. It should be of interest to the general public how the American judicial system views defamation claims, especially since most persons now, including juveniles, are routinely using social media platforms to express their opinions.

The pivotal event which caused me to first observe the plaintiff and the three defendants occurred on June 14, 2017 when the Port of Charleston, South Carolina was closed due to information that was given by George Webb on Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource The Truth show, involving a warning of a possible dirty bomb aboard the Maersk Memphis. Also around that time frame, several “conflicts” erupted concerning Defango, Dave (Sweigert) Acton, George (Sweigert) Webb, Jason Goodman and Trish Negron, along with a few others on other matters. And it was about this point in time that Queen Tut made her entrance onto the scene via The Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel.

Because of the Maersk Memphis dirty bomb incident arising from George Webb’s secret insider source, there were those who speculated that this whole situation was an Operation created for the purposes of restricting free speech on the internet. If this speculation has any merit, the question is, under whose authority was an Op set in motion? But the basic problem with this type of question is that the general public does not have the means to investigate, to discover hidden facts and relationships, to uncover money trails or any other type of information which is not open sourced. Thus the Robert David Steele lawsuit does present an interesting situation because it centers on internet defamation, and thus it falls into that general area of concern over what the boundaries of free speech really are.

I have read comments that assert that Robert David Steele is not a former CIA employee, as he claims.  Yet these persons never address the fact that there is a documented record on Steele, going back years on the internet,  that is entirely consistent with his published resume, including his public interactions with high ranking military officials, his government contracts, and his writings. Because of that public record, I find that Robert David Steele’s biography is credible.  I also have stated that he has provided much information on what he believes, and on his projects, so  that anyone can form a reasoned opinion about whether or not to financially support his endeavors.

And then there are the accusations and joking references that Jason Goodman and George Webb have connections to MOSSAD. All this creates an aura of CIA versus MOSSAD, or CIA impersonators versus MOSSAD impersonators. In all of this there is also the anti Zionist versus the pro Zionist thread running through this adversarial set-up. Thus there is little of the middle ground, which is the stance of the ordinary American citizen, represented in the panoramic view of the background of how this lawsuit came into existence in the first place.

What we do know is that on Jun 13, 2017, one day prior to the Port of Charleston, South Carolina incident, George Webb met with Robert David Steele at a restaurant and together they appeared on Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel,  where several thousand dollars was raised for Steele’s #UNRIG campaign. This joint effort was so successful that Robert David Steele was scheduled for an interview with Jason Goodman and Patricia Negron two days later. However, because of the involvement of George Webb and Jason Goodman in communicating the false information which led to the closing down of the Charleston port on June 14th, Robert David Steele cancelled that interview.

According to Steele, this withdrawing of his association from Crowdsource The Truth, was the beginning of the subsequent friction he had with Goodman and Negron.  His  lawsuit complaint asserts that Queen Tut, a woman believed to be known as Carla A. Howell, began acting together and in concert with Goodman and Negron on June 15, 2017.

However, the first documented video of Queen Tut’s involvement that is noted in Steele’s lawsuit  seems to be June 26, 2017. It is also noted that Jason Goodman officially withdrew his endorsement of Robert David Steele on July 1, 2017. Coincidentally, it was on July 1, 2017 that Susan (Holmes) Lutzke, who is now accused by Robert David Steele of being Queen Tut, lost her son Jeremy Holmes when he was shot by police in Fort Collins, Colorado. This confrontation with the police, came about after his mother had phoned 911 to report that her son, armed with a large knife, was attempting to make his way to his brother’s home to fulfil a death threat.

So almost from the start of the Queen Tut arrival on the stage of Crowdsource The Truth, this tragic undercurrent of sorrow and anger arising from the death of Susan Lutzke’s son is a factor in her conduct  which needs to be kept in remembrance, as we ponder these events in hindsight.

On March 17, 2018, Jason Goodman published on his Crowdsource The Truth YouTube channel a 23 minute video called Libel, Lies and Lawsuits-Queen Tut Evidence Exposed. Although some of this video had sound problems, overall the information and commentary which Goodman presents is worth considering.

Jason Goodman is seen walking along a city street with people laughing in the background, and so I pick up his commentary at the 1.17 mark as he reflects on more recent events relating to the Robert David Steele lawsuit and Queen Tut’s actions.

Jason Goodman:  “…Robert David Steele, I call him a liar, because he lied and presented evidence that he’s lied, he’s spoken about his ridiculous lawsuit and he claims to have through discovery learned that I am paid by MOSSAD.  This is a lie.  Robert David Steele has not entered Discovery with his lawsuit, and I am not paid by MOSSAD and he has no evidence of that, therefore he’s lying and I’m calling him out on his lie and anyone who wants to defend that needs to present evidence to support his claim.”

Tracking Meroz comment:  In the screenshot below  is an excerpt of a November 21, 2017  ExoNews reposting of an article written by Robert David Steele dated November 7, 2017 called “How the Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics”. Notice that Steele speculates that legal discovery will reveal monthly payments to Goodman at around $3,000 month.  I do not know if there is another document that supports Goodman’s statement that RDS had claimed he already had begun the Discovery process in his lawsuit.

excerpt from Robert David Steele article, “How The Deep State Controls Social Media & Digitally Assassinates Critics”

Jason Goodman:  “This is a very simple process.  Evidence.  Jake Morphonios, would you think I am lying? You have no evidence to prove it, to show that I’m lying. Show that I’m wrong.  Let’s focus on this lawsuit, because there’s been a lot of activity coming from Queen Tut.  Susan Lutzke is what she told me her name was, but then she also sometimes goes by Susan Holmes on, enough there was this big development you know she spread first the lie that I had somehow wanted Trish to pay a lawyer or force Trish to pay a lawyer or plan to base my defense on Trish spending money on a lawyer.  This is not true.”

“I have answered Robert David Steele some stupid childish complaint Pro Se, meaning “defending myself”, your lawyer.  Now Trish could have done that.  I didn’t tell her to hire a lawyer.  I didn’t tell Trish my legal defense, we’re just not affiliated.  I have no responsibilities, no responsibility for her.  She’s an adult woman who can make her own decisions.  She could have answered the suit Pro Se, she could have ignored it like Susan has, and it was up to Trish to do whatever she wanted so this whole stupid narrative that Susan is trying to build that I’m somehow doing something to Trish or that Robert David Steele’s lawyer not doing anything after I answered Robert David Steele’s ridiculous complaint, you know she’s trying to make it look like something is going on.  So let’s look at what recently happened.”

“There’s this website called PACER which let’s you, it’s you know, public access to court electronic records.  You can read everything you want to read about the moronic lawsuit from Robert David Steele, including a letter recently sent by someone on behalf of Queen Tut….(shows the February 21, 2018 Mercia Francis letter including birth certificate in a previously taped session which was inserted into this March 17, 2018 commentary.)

Tracking Meroz commentary:  It would appear that Jason Goodman in his March 17th broadcast,  had not checked the PACER records in early March, and so like me, missed that the Judge had issued an Order regarding the Mercia Francis letters.  This Order can be viewed in the Tracking Meroz post dated March 22, 2018.

Jason Goodman: (7.20)…”Queen Tut told me the story that the police killed her son.  I think she said it was the Fort Collins police and she also told me that she went to a protest at Colorado State University, and you can see in the lower right hand corner here, I’ve placed an image that someone took at that protest which is Susan Lutzke holding a sign that says, “KILL ALL POLICE- THEY ARE KILLING US”….”.Jason Goodman provides a clip of the November 7, 2017 City of Fort Collins meeting (FCTV) and at the 8.21 mark citizen participation is allowed, and Susan (Lutzke) Holmes is given permission to speak. Tracking Meroz comment:  The date of this appearance is coincidentally the same date noted by ExoNews for the Robert David Steele article of November 7, 2017).

Susan Lutzke Holmes: (8.24 mark of Fort Collins video)  “My name is Susan Holmes.  I have a story, that supports the Native American Awareness Month.  My son, Jeremy Holmes was an enrolled member of the Native American Tribe.  He was 19 years old.  he was slaughtered, shot to death SIX TIMES by the CSU campus police officer and by Fort Collins police officer.  That is how Fort Collins treats Native American people.”

“My son, I’m here to clear my son’s name and I’m going to make a special request from this council to give the time to do it because he has been discredited and destroyed by the DA’s report.  The DA’s opinion.  The DA used words taken from me in a traumatic state when I found he was dead in a hospital to use in his DA’s opinion to justify the slaughter of my son.  So I’m asking that you give me the time to clear his name and to talk about his life and his death in Fort Collins because the community needs to know the truth about what is happening here.”

“I, when the DA’s opinion is the only narrative that is existing right now about what happened to my son and is completely filled with a number of false statements and I can prove that.  However, when I went to the Coloradoan to try to prove to have them to purchase half a page or a page to disabuse the false statements in the DA’s Opinion, they refused to let me buy that time to write that article so that I could inform the community about what’s REALLY happening in this community about what the police are doing to Native American teenagers who are in a mental health crisis.”

Photo of Jeremy Holmes at

“I have been living in HELL for four months since my son was shot to death.  His spine was shattered, his chest was pierced, his femoral artery was torn and the rest of the bullets just hit wherever.  He bled out on the street on Prospect.  He did not deserve to die that way.  He was an incredible human being.  He was brilliant, he graduated with honors from high school.  He was in the middle of designing a game, he was an IT kid, he was registered for college.  He was an incredible human being and he did not deserve to die like that.”.

Male voice of Fort Collins city council member: (11.30) “Ma’am, thank you.”

Susan (Lutzke) Holmes: “I’m NOT done!  I want the time to talk about my son’s life and his death…”. (The council decides to take a recess).

Here is a link to the July 18, 2017 Opinion of Clifford E. Riedel, District Attorney of the Eighth Judicial District of Colorado on the shooting death of Jeremy Holmes.  There are also several websites which show the police camera footage of their engagement with the knife wielding Jeremy Holmes, which resulted in his death.

Jason Goodman:  (12.23) “…in the DA’s report found that the police acted appropriately, but Queen Tut insists otherwise, and she also would instruct the college students at the University of Colorado to kill all police….”.

Jason Goodman: (13.03) “…the point is Susan Lutzke Holmes Tut has either submitted a fraudulent document to a United States Court, that letter written saying that she’s suffering from dementia and is 80 years old.  She’s either lying to the Court or she’s been lying to all of us the whole time and that woman standing there in Fort Collins, Colorado is not Susan Lutzke or Queen Tut.  I don’t know what to make of this, but I do know that Susan Lutzke Tut Queen Tut whatever this lady’s name is, Susan Holmes is a liar who has lied to you to try to convince you that I have committed crimes, that I am involved in pedophilia.   She has presented no evidence, OK, and here’s the thing.”

“This is a message I want to send to everyone.  If you don’t like it when I address these accusations, I understand.  But you don’t have to watch and it’s your right to not watch, but I need to keep doing this because you see this is the way these people operate.  They put out fake information. They put anonymous posts, places like 4chan.  Somebody shared with me a post from an anonymous person who says, oh a friend of mine connected with Jason on Tinder and she’s 15 and Jason said this and she said that and Jason was sexting a 15 year old.  This is untrue. (gives real life examples of posting fake documents).”

Jason Goodman: (15.39)…  “Each of these people are complicit in what is now an organized operation where they are working together to defame me, to slander me, and to harass me and they’re doing this not because I’m guilty of any of the horrendous things that they’ve accused me of.  It’s because I’m having guests on Crowdsource The Truth who are bringing forth evidence that do things like help in the firing of Andrew McCabe….”

Jason Goodman: (18.10)  “I really hope someone in law enforcement in Fort Collins, Colorado or in Virginia where that false document was submitted to the Court, is there a lawyer out there who can tell me what kind of crime is it to submit a false document to the Court because there was a time that I spoke to Susan Lutzke Holmes Tut on the phone almost every day!  And that woman’s not 80, I think she’s like 50 something or 60 and the woman that we saw in those videos looks like she’s about 60…”.

Tracking Meroz commentary: 

Jason Goodman has presented an interesting commentary with regard to some of the words of Queen Tut and Robert David Steele, which he claims are unfounded statements, not backed by evidence. Also he has provided some of the back story on Susan Lutzke which helps us to better understand how she has presented herself in the public arena.

It must be recalled that it was Jason Goodman who first introduced Susan Lutzke to his audience under a false name that he invented, as a cover to hide her true identity as his journalistic source.  Subsequent to that, he was aware of the circumstances surrounding her son’s death, and this fact had been alluded to on one of their videos. Perhaps she continued on with her research on Robert David Steele as a way to refocus her thoughts away from her personal tragedy.  

If you view the police camera footage which justifies the actions which the officers were forced to take, one has to agree with the conclusions made by the District Attorney who evaluated all the facts of this situation.  It is apparent from later public comments and actions of Susan (Holmes) Lutzke,  that she did not possess the grace to acknowledge the truth of the untenable situation in which her son had placed the officers in.  Instead, she chose to falsely accuse others for the type of death which Jeremy Holmes brought upon himself. 

I have a soft spot in my heart for Susan Lutzke’s loss of her 19 year old son.  But the hard truth about life and its burdens, is that it is never excusable to falsely accuse,  or to wrongly shift the burden of blame onto others, when the facts and evidence suggest otherwise.  Because this is a Christian commentary, I do not consider this story to be just a matter of “winning” a war of words in a lawsuit, but rather the importance of making right judgments in the interest of real justice.  Our own words go deep into the very heart of what we are in the sight of God.  One day all of us will have to give an account to God for our words and deeds, and that event ought to be soberly considered by every person, as we freely communicate on the internet.



Robert David Steele’s Attorney gets careless with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding Queen Tut

I just checked the Robert David Steele v. Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron, and Queen Tut, a woman believed to be known as Carla A. Howell lawsuit case 3:17-cv-00601-MHL and read document 35 filed March 9, 2018, ORDER by United States District Judge M. Hannah Lauck.

The Judge has ruled that the Motion for Default Against “Queen Tut” a/k/a/ Susan A. Lutzke is denied without prejudice, because it is not Lutzke’s name that shows on the list of defendants in the Complaint.  I had been wondering about that fact, and I am glad to see that this technicality has been addressed by the Court. The court also stated it would not receive documents submitted anonymously, and the clerk has restricted such documents so that they remain on record, but are not accessible to the public.

The two page order can be read here:    rds 3 9 2018

And in this corner: A Man Called SUE contending against Leviathan, Behemoth and God Almighty!

Shall he that contendeth with the Almighty instruct him? he that reproveth God, let him answer it.  Job 40:2

On February 20, 2018 a video was produced, and published a couple of days later on the Benjamin Fulford YouTube channel,  titled  Benjamin Fulford and Robert David Steele at Inokashira Park.

Tokyo, Japan on Feb. 20, 2018

This 20 minute interview took place on a lovely day among  beautiful Japanese gardens.  At the 9.04 mark, Robert David Steele inserted into the conversation a  remark which gives insight into his own soul, saying “…I read a book called Caesar’s Messiah and it’s an absolutely extraordinary juxtaposition of The Wars of the Jews by Titus and his descendants, and the New Testament, and it makes the case that the Bible and Christianity, the Catholic Church, were actually created as the first major psychological operation by Caesar and his descendants to basically tell people to turn the other cheek and render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s.”

Revisionist History For The Foolhardy

Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus was first published by Joseph Atwill on April 15, 2005.  According to an article in  Wikipedia on Caesar’s Messiah “As a youth, Joseph Atwill studied Greek, Latin and the Bible at St. Mary’s Military Academy, a Jesuit-run school in Japan”. Robert David Steele has referred to himself as a “lapsed Columbian Jesuit altar boy, who once knew the mass in Latin.”   So there is a common Jesuit influence in both men’s educational and religious backgrounds, as youths.  Now in their senior years, both the author and Steele regard the New Testament evidence of Jesus Christ as a complete fabrication by Caesar to pacify the enemies of state.

In advancing this theory, Robert David Steele favors his CIA imprinting which gravitates to the concept of government operations which are designed to control the masses through the use of psychological techniques.  But shoving God out of recorded history by bearing  false witness against the historical documents of the Bible, the eye witness reports of those who knew the man Jesus and his resurrection as Christ, and the foundational doctrines of the early church which were based on the law and the prophets, has consequences for those who tamper with the evidence.

Moral Consequences for the Amoral?

What consequences?  Well, reflect for a moment that on September 1, 2017, Robert David Steele filed a federal court civil lawsuit accusing three defendants of defamation.  In other words, Steele wants to be compensated for the alleged damages done to his reputation by those he claims have borne false witness against him and his nonprofit organization.

Caesar’s ghost is about to come back to haunt this plaintiff to remind him that he approved of Atwill’s deceitful handling of the reputation of Jesus Christ.  Romans 2:1 declares,  Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.  Of course, despite what Atwill and Steele assert, Caesar and his minions never had any hand in writing the New Testament, but Pilate might prove to be an interesting witness for God. Romans 2:1 is part of a larger argument set forth by the apostle Paul, and it declares in plain language a universally accepted principle of judgment,  which is understandable even to children.

I am never quite sure where Robert David Steele really stands on any issue, because his methods employ contradictory messages. For example, he has complained time and again that Zionists have played an inordinate part in the corruption of American Government. I am not sure precisely how he defines Zionism, but my own conception of this label equates it with the Talmudic Jews which Jesus Christ rebuked for making the words of God of none effect, by their (oral) traditions. In later history, these Talmudic views were written down, and presently stand as a witness that the beliefs of  Zionism represent a great gulf between themselves and what had been set forth in the Old Testament as the faithfully recorded oracles of God. Zionists/Talmudic Jews do not believe that Jesus Christ was the promised Messiah, and Robert David Steele seems to stand with them in that regard.

I had noted in previous articles on Robert David Steele that he likes to use the occultic “union of opposing principles” method of creating unity in diversity, and this was seen in the structuring of his #UNRIG campaign, when for example an alliance of Alt Right with Alt Left was foundational for Steele’s  Election Reform campaign. While we all try to find common ground with those we disagree with in order to create a peaceful civil society, there is always a line which cannot be crossed in the interest of upholding truth.

Taking On The Deep State of Leviathan and Behemoth:  But first those pesky child sex slaves on Mars

So let’s go back to the very beginning of the Benjamin Fulford  taped discussion with Robert David Steele, and see how this interview was constructed to begin.

About 40 seconds in, Benjamin Fulford says, “Robert you know we’ve both been subject to hit jobs and smear tactics and when I looked at your Wikipedia, it said that you had said that there were child sex slaves on Mars and I hear that this is just a big fake attempt to discredit you.  Could you tell us what was behind that?  Why?”

Robert David Steele:  “Well, I have a federal lawsuit out which I expect to win.  I have an extraordinarily good defamation lawsuit, and so I’m not going to argue the details in public, but I will say that I was doing a two hour video with Alex Jones on pedophilia.  I’m a commissioner as well as the chief counsel on a judicial inquiry into pedophilia (note:  this so-called judicial inquiry does not appear to be officially commissioned, but rather some sort of private arrangement which RDS has referred to as an “International Tribunal for Natural Justice“.), and I believe that my two hours of remarks scared the living hell out of a particular murderous pedophile in the media business, and he commissioned a hit job by a guy in the Daily BeastIt will have to come out in a Federal lawsuit.

“I did not say that there were child sex slaves on Mars.  In answer to a question at the very end of the program, I said that we use children for long range space missions 20 years and out – that was 20 years ago and that we had a base on Mars that was established 15 years ago, and has 10,000 people on it.  That’s a fact according to a retired NSA PHD that told me and someone else that fact.”

Media hit jobs are only a small part of the defamation that you and I have suffered, Ben.  I have written a very well-read article that had 2,500 referrals that read it in one day and it’s a tiny URL/Google Gestapo, and it outlines the different ways in which the Deep State and particularly the Zionist supporting foundation for the Deep State, which has the Anti-Defamation League as its primary secret police.  They censor, manipulate and digitally assassinate people, oh and the reason they do this is because those people are getting close to the truth.”

Benjamin Fulford:  (3.45) (he discusses his own problems)…”and it was clear there was a concerted campaign to ruin my reputation”…(gives examples)…(4.05)…”all I can say is that at the end of the day, I’m gonna be suing the Simon Wiesenthal Center, I’m gonna be suing  Michael Green from CSIS, a lot of people are not just gonna be sued, they’re gonna go to jail for this.”

The Lawyer who sees a triple pot of gold at the end of the “defamation by conspiracy” lawsuit

Robert David Steele:  “Well, let me tell you something.  I’d like to introduce you to my lawyer who’s the best, one of the best defamation lawyers in the country, and he’s taught me a lot and one of the things he’s taught me, Ben, is that if you can show conspiracy, which is if you can show that certain select people egged other people on, guided them, funded them, whatever, conspiracy is triple damages.  Now I don’t know what kind of statute of limitations you might be running up against, but please let me introduce you to my lawyer.  Let him win cases for both of us.”

Benjamin Fulford:  “It’s, it’s time you know these people have done enough with their lies and their slander.”

Robert David Steele: “Don’t talk about them in public, take them to court.  Sue them, OK.” (5.00)

Do I dare offer a word of caution to this Daring Duo?

In reviewing the above comments by Robert David Steele and Benjamin Fulford, it is interesting to note that the first issue out of the gate is the Mars child sex colony story which became the subject for humor after his interview on the Alex Jones show. Steele likes to emphasize that he did not discuss child sex slaves, as if the rest of his narrative about 10,000 persons living on Mars is a credible statement. Given that we have yet to colonize the Moon, why should anyone believe that a former NSA employee had provided exclusive top secret insider information to Robert David Steele and another unidentified person proving that a Mars colony had in fact been established?

And who is it that routinely  likes to “bolster” his own credentials by asserting that he had been nominated for a Nobel prize, and that he is also a Commissioner for some unofficial group called the International Tribunal for Natural Justice?  Is there some law of the Universe that says that when Robert David Steele speaks, his listeners are to suspend their reasoning faculties, or be sued for being part of a conspiracy for laughing at the pretentious?

Steele claims that some unidentified pedophile in the media commissioned a hit job on him which resulted in the Daily Beast article on June 29, 2017 by Ben Collins titled, NASA Denies That It’s Running A Child Slave Colony on Mars. If he has proof of that, why not publish it?  After all these years of promoting the Open Sourcing of documents in the public domain, why withhold his “evidence”?  Perhaps the free open sourcing of information has lost favor for the possibility of gaining triple damages from  Federal civil court lawsuits, if only a conspiracy can be proved.

One of the first declarations in the Benjamin Fulford interview of Robert David Steele is that Steele expects to WIN his defamation lawsuit. I am no attorney, but the point of a lawsuit is that one submits a complaint to a court, to which the defendants reply in kind, as both sides plead their case before an impartial JUDGE. Does Robert David Steele  not respect the reality that the Judge may rule against him?  After all, defendants often argue their cause and overturn the complaint of a plaintiff, especially if the accusations are frivolous ones.

But going back to the odd insertion of the thesis of Joseph Atwill into the midpoint of this interview, which asserted that Jesus was an invention of Caesar; that conclusion  was arrived at by overturning historical evidence.  So what  happens when an impartial judge shows up to review the facts, the evidence, and the legal arguments? 

What will happen when the Judge of all the earth shows up to review the words of those who have borne false witness against the historicity of Jesus as both man, and as the Son of God? Who will dare to plead the cause of a liar? When it comes to truth, we are standing on holy ground.  A person who declares that they have won a lawsuit even before the Judge has examined the arguments, is behaving in a  foolhardy manner.

But continuing on, there is this statement:

Robert David Steele:  (7.13) What I have found in the United Sates is that the Mossad perfected the art of blackmailing people…

I have heard statements to the effect that Robert David Steele appears to believe that one of the defendants in his defamation lawsuit is a paid operative of the MOSSAD. So I will be interested to see what court tested evidence will show up to document that assertion.

And really, MOSSAD has perfected the art of blackmailing?  As if the CIA, where Steele was employed, did not perfect a few arts of their own!

How about this example of a veiled threat attempt to persuade President Trump to endorse Robert David Steele’s vision?

Robert David Steele: (14.17)…”and you seem to recognize that my Open Source Agency which I’ve been trying to get Donald Trump to, to build, I’m being kept away from Donald Trump by Jim Kelly among others uh, so if Donald Trump does not want to listen to me or is not being allowed to talk to me, I’m gonna build it for the Chinese, the Iranians, and the Russians.  America, I would like to build the Open Source Agency for you, but if I can’t build it for you, I will build it for Xi Jinping and Putin and others.”

So, Robert David Steele, if you cannot get Trump to officially sanction a brand new agency which you have designed and want to head, you will go to the Chinese and the Russian Communists, and the Iranians.  Thanks for your loyalty to America. Is this not the type of behavior that Americans are concerned about, when influential groups of citizens hold dual citizenship? Whose side are you really on, Mr. Steele?

Oh never mind, these Contenders Against the Deep State are the good guys

Benjamin Fulford: (11.48) …”and now the good guys, the white hats in the military and the agencies around the world are getting rid of these murderous scum and we’re winning and they’re losing and we’re gonna get, we’re gonna go right to Zeb Switzerland, their headquarters, we’re gonna go to Milan, we’re gonna get all of them.”

So after these two men  discuss how the good guys are winning against the Deep State, and after Robert David Steele has suggested to President Trump that it’s my way or the highway, he tells Benjamin Fulford, “So I think our two visions intersect“.

I see where all of this intersects!  In addition to contending with  Leviathan and Behemoth of the Deep State, let us not forget that someone had also decided to contend with God  in the middle of this interview by playing revisionist historian with The New Testament record of the words of Jesus Christ.

I began this post with Job 40:2 asking, Shall he that contendeth with the Almighty instruct him?  he that reproveth God, let him answer it.

The LORD in Job 40:8-14,  further challenges his contenders to prove themselves:  Wilt thou also disannul my judgment?  wilt thou condemn me, that thou mayest be righteous?  Hast thou an arm like God? or canst thou thunder with a voice like him?  Deck thyself now with majesty and excellency; and array thyself with glory and  beauty.  Cast abroad the rage of thy wrath:  and behold every one that is proud, and abase him.  Look on every one that is proud, and bring him low; and tread down the wicked in their place.  Hide them in the dust together; and bind their faces in secret.  Then will I also confess unto thee that thine own right hand can save thee. 

Queen Tut’s Daughter Mercia Francis Submits Another Letter to the Court in Robert David Steele Defamation Case

A letter from Mercia Francis dated February 25, 2018 and received by the Clerk of U. S. District Court in Richmond, VA on February 28, 2018 was filed on the court record on March 1, 2018. This 14 page document (#33) consists of a 2 page letter from Mercia Francis, a letter from FOCO Properties concerning the tenancy of Susan Lutzke in a Fort Collins, CO condominium, and the November 7, 2017 Robert David Steele article called, How The Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics.

This Robert David Steele article had been addressed in a November 12, 2017 commentary here at Tracking the Leopard Meroz called Robert David Steele and His List of Crowdstalkers and Co-Conspirators:  Is Your Name On This List?

Read Document 33 at this link:robert david steele 3 1 2018 letter qt.

The Strategic Maneuvers of Queen Tut Around the Robert David Steele Defamation Lawsuit

“…because you never take a stand against deception, what you have to do is move around deception.  You have to beat them at their own game”.  Queen Tut
[Queen Tut Interview II-Hoax Wars Live, published February 23, 2018 on You Tube, 34.14 mark]

Hoax Wars: Is the legal war between Robert David Steele and Queen Tut for real, or is it just a hoax mocking the American judicial system’s method of arriving at truth through facts and evidence?

On September 1, 2017 Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network filed a civil lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division, against Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron and Queen Tut, A Woman Believed to be Known as Carla A. Howell.  The Plaintiff is seeking compensatory, statutory (three-fold the damages sustained), and punitive damages in an amount not less than $15,350,000.  In addition, the plaintiff desires “prejudgment interest on the principal sum awarded by the Jury from June 15, 2017 to the date of Judgment at the rate of six percent per year, attorney’s fees, and costs arising out of Defendants’ defamation per se, insulting words, business conspiracy, common-law conspiracy, and tortious interference with contract and business expectancies”.

Jason Goodman is representing himself (Pro Se), Patricia Negron is represented by professional legal counsel…and then there is the third defendant who is taking another strategy altogether.

Contrary to popular opinion, Queen Tut is not so ancient, after all. Her birth certificate filed with the federal court shows she is a young 80 years old, although suffering a bit of dementia, diagnosed after she forgot there is a $15 million dollar lawsuit against her.

The third defendant, Queen Tut, is known on the internet primarily through her anonymous interviews, and by her signature Trello Boards which feature the main points of her topics.

In the February 23d Hoax Wars interview, Queen Tut at the 32.11 mark says, “I’m getting to my reveal here, okay?  Because  I was fully aware of how RDS operates, because I worked in anti-corruption for many years and I’m aware of the kind of strategies that the bad guys use, okay, to manipulate and silence people.  I was involved in that very heavily for a long period of time and so when this court case was filed, I knew I was not gonna respond to it because first of all they had to serve me okay, which I have never been served um, and I knew that uh, they were just gonna try and flush Queen Tut out because they already had their hands on Jason, they already had their hands on Trish, but the whole thing is they just want to flush everybody out and you know, create chaos.”

Going back to when this defamation lawsuit was first filed, we find that on page 8 of the complaint that the statement was made that “Defendant, ‘Queen Tut’, is a person believed to be Carla A. Howell.  Howell is a citizen of New Jersey.  She is a political activist.  There is a biography of her on the internet…At all times relevant to this action, Queen Tut acted in concert with and as an agent, alter ego or instrumentality of Goodman and Negron”.

Later, without apology to Howell for falsely naming her as a defendant, the Plaintiffs filed court documents against another person who they thought might be Queen Tut, a Susan A. Lutzke who they claimed had been legally served with a court summons. Months later, when no response to this summons was made, the Plaintiffs asked the court to declare a default judgment against Lutzke.

The submission to the court of Queen Tut’s birth certificate

On February 22, 2018 a two page document comprised of a letter and a birth certificate was filed with the court stating that Queen Tut was given the name at birth of Helen Suzanne Ingraham.  The birth certificate displays a date of birth of December 4, 1937, making this new person behind the Queen Tut voice, to be 80 years old.  The accompanying letter from the daughter, Mercia Francis, claims that her mother has been diagnosed with dementia and is not providing an address or contact because of fears that Robert David Steele might send someone to harm her.

The next day, on February 23, 2018,  the attorney for the plaintiff filed an 8 page letter to the Judge indicating that they had no knowledge of Mercia Francis, the writer of the letter, and were unable to find any online information about this person.  Attorney  Steven S. Biss stated, “Defendant, Queen Tut a/k/a/ Susan A. Lutzke, does not suffer from dementia.” The rest of this letter was devoted to displaying Twitter messages from Queen Tut’s account in order to support their assertion that Susan Lutzke had “ramped up her attacks on Robert David Steele”.

Why are there no statements to the court from Carla Howell or Susan Lutzke?

What is so bizarre about this issue of who is behind the Queen Tut anonymous handle, is that neither Carla Howell nor Susan A. Lutzke has written the court to deny that they are this Queen Tut who is being sued for defamation against Robert David Steele and his nonprofit corporation, Earth Intelligence Network. The natural response of most persons to discovering that they were wrongly named as a defendant in a lawsuit would be to quickly and vehemently explain to the court that they had nothing to do with the plaintiff and demand that such persons cease and desist from continuing to make false accusations.

This new assertion to the court that Queen Tut is an 80 year old woman with dementia who is unwilling to provide an address or means of contact does little to clear up the mystery of her identity.  One has to consider that the childhood surname has since been changed to reflect at least one marriage, because the attorney for the plaintiffs were unable to discover an internet footprint of the names provided.

On February 23, 2018 a YouTube channel called Hoax Wars granted a second interview with Queen Tut.  The first interview involved her discussion of the amount of money that Patricia Negron had to pay for her legal representation, as well as remarks  about Jason Goodman and his legal strategy. In both interviews, Queen Tut is as lively as ever, with no signs of dementia or paranoia.

Before asking the Judge to declare a default judgment against Queen Tut, was she properly served with a summons as required by Federal court procedures?

In this most recent interview is the document shown below,  which Queen Tut displays in her usual Trello Board format. She has titled this board, (Double?) Agent Robert David Steele:  Active Measures Against the Internet Truth Movement…One of the pieces of evidence which Queen Tut presents to back up her arguments,  is a letter stating that Susan Lutzke had not lived in the condo apartments where Robert David Steele had claimed to have served her a court summons, since 2015.

When one reviews the Affidavit of Service which was provided by Roland Process Svc. and Investigations, LLC, it was noted that on October 11, 2017 that service was attempted, and “I spoke with a male subject stated his name was Steve. He said he has lived there for 2 years and has gotten several pieces of mail for Susan.”  On the fourth attempt, the documents were left at the door.

Should not the process server checked with the condo management regarding the tenancy of Susan Lutzke?

Given the statement by Steve Bytnar who claims that Susan A. Lutzke had not resided at the address in question since March of 2015, it would appear to the impartial observer that legal service had not been completed on Ms. Lutzke.  If that is the case, the document 30 filed in this lawsuit, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant, “Queen Tut” a/k/a/ Susan A. Lutzke seems premature because it bases its conclusion on what appears to be misinformation that proper service had been completed. This is a matter for the Judge to review and make a determination on.

Is Robert David Steele a double agent of the Russians, and employing their Active Measures strategy?

Queen Tut’s Trello Board uses the term Active Measures which refers to the set of techniques which Soviet security and intelligence departments use to influence the politics of other nations. These methods are the same as that of the CIA, Mafia style groups and others, so it is significant that Queen Tut is emphasizing a Russian link, and she ties a former KGB General’s short recommendation of one of Robert David Steele’s books to support her thesis that Robert David Steele might be a double or even a triple agent.

The Russian link is the latest fad accusation, just as the pedophilia accusation had been widely promoted last year by the social media attention getters. I am not going to go into detail with how Queen Tut lays out her argument that Robert David Steele’s actions match those of Active Measures; but if you are interested, examine her illustrated argument in her Trello Board and listen to her second Hoax Wars video.  My complaint with regard to her presentation of the Active Measures methodology of Robert David Steele is that she has not proven, with hard evidence, the assertions she makes. In fact there can be many reasons unassociated with a Soviet link, that would explain why and how Steele behaves as he does.

At the 38.51 mark, Queen Tut comments, “…basically what I was doing was giving him enough rope to hang themselves, okay?  And they did.  They did hang themselves and here’s the evidence and everyone would be able to see that when they look at the Trello Board, okay.  Now here’s the other thing that I’m going to reveal tonight that’s breaking news.  So everybody, I wanted to share this piece of it because this is significant because it shows how Active Measures are applied against people, and how attorneys with practices will lie, especially when they’re the arm of the Intel Agencies or the Intel Operations who are applying Active Measures against American citizens, for wanting to know the truth, okay?”

She explains, “So perfect example here of what they do to individuals and then we find out here of what they do to individuals and then we find out they, they lie, they don’t care about the law.  This attorney does not care about the law, okay?  Robert David Steele doesn’t care about Americans.  He doesn’t care about them.  He’s working two sides, maybe three, for who knows what kind of compensation, so here’s the big reveal.  This is, I’m gonna leave this hanging a little bit, here’s the reveal.  I am NOT Carla Howell.  Queen Tut is not Carla Howell…(40.35)…then they claimed it was Susan Lutzke, then they claimed that they served Susan Lutzke and she doesn’t even live there, okay?  And now I’m gonna let everybody know I’m not Susan Lutzke…(41.06)   in fact I have sent my birth certificate to the court about 4 or 5 days ago and it is now published on the court, in the court documents who I am, okay?”

Did Queen Tut’s “Big Reveal” clear away the fog surrounding her true identity?

The confusion of Queen Tut’s true identity has not been cleared up, despite the above proclamation.  The letter sent to the court was written by a Mercia Francis, who claims, “I am writing on behalf of my mother, known as Queen Tut…My mother has recently been diagnosed with dementia and I am now overseeing her social media and other affairs.” So why does Queen Tut say she sent the documents to the court?  Is she both Helen Suzanne Ingraham, and Mercia Francis?  Are the statements in these documents true?

At around the 36 minute mark of the Hoax Wars interview, Queen Tut is discussing the false basis on which the court summons of Susan Lutzke had been made, and she comments, “…when you file false affidavits in federal courts that’s serious…”. If there is any part of the documents filed by Queen Tut that are not true, that is also serious.

Assuming the birth certificate is actually that of Queen Tut, will it be shown later that she does not have a medically diagnosed case of dementia, and that this statement is on the artful side when the letter writer declares, “I am concerned about providing an address or contact number because my mother is fearful that Robert David Steele might send someone to harm her.  This fear could be associated with her diagnosis or his CIA background may inform that type of threat. I’m hoping this letter can be filed before any action is taken against the wrong people.”

The civil case legal process is always a slow one, as each side is allowed a time period to respond to the documentation which is filed with the court. So it may be some time before the questions which are presently being raised are answered with facts and evidence. But one item of interest should be noted.  Those who are aware that they are named in a civil case, and deliberately seek to avoid being served in accordance with standard procedures, can be legally brought into the court by other measures.

Since Queen Tut is the anonymous internet handle of a woman who has not been totally forthcoming in providing details of her whereabouts, or her personal history, it is worth mentioning that there was a defamation case filed on February 3, 2009 by Mark and Rhonda Lesher against anonymous message board posters on The judge in that case ordered that the IP addresses be provided in order to identify the persons responsible for posting defamatory comments against the Leshers.  In that particular case, the accusations were very serious ones which caused substantial financial harm,  and were based on false accusations which had been the basis of a criminal complaint. The Leshers were granted a thirteen million dollar judgment in the civil case, which can be read about in the articles linked here and here.

The “giving of enough rope to hang themselves” strategy

A final quote from the Queen Tut in the Hoax Wars interview at about the 42 minute mark is of interest: “…but by writing, which is what I did intentionally, I gave them enough rope to hang themselves.  And that’s a strategic way to deal with bad guys and I’m just sharing this with you guys not, to like you know, for any kind of ego scene.  I just want people to understand that when you’re dealing with evil guys or deal with criminal guys you have to be strategic, okay?  You, you can, you can react all you want and go whoa, I want to stand for truth; that’s one thing, but when you’re dealing with these guys, you have to be very, very strategic and you got to let them screw up and in this situation, they have, very, very profoundly.”

Genuine adversaries or hoaxers?

Perhaps Robert David Steele also has the same identical strategy as Queen Tut, which is to give your adversary enough rope to hang themselves.  It could be that we are witnessing the possibility that there might be two hangings in the making, if each is successful in their goals.  Who knows?  Is this a strategic duel where two adversaries end up doing each other in, a sort of ying/yang karmic cause and effect?  Both Robert David Steele and Queen Tut seem to think that they are unique in representing what has been termed the Internet Truth Movement. But there are so many accusations, so little evidence….truth is being trampled underfoot in the dust…where does that leave those who are willing to stand alone to speak the truth? I must presume that it is those persons who God has chosen to stand against deception, not those anonymous entities without the personal courage and wit to do so.