In Remembrance of the Port of Charleston Dirty Bomb Hoax June 14, 2017

Flag Day – June 14 –  Tracking the Leopard Meroz would like to honor  those Americans who  respect the delicate bonds which hold  a free and civilized society together, ensuring our continuance as a great nation.

We are nearing another June the 14th Flag Day, made infamous in 2017, when the Port of Charleston was shutdown for 8 hours, as law enforcement agencies responded to a report of a dirty bomb aboard the Memphis Maersk. 

Curiously, the originator of that report handed off his information to two YouTube broadcast journalists, rather than taking direct  responsibility to quietly warn the United States Coastguard of his concerns.

Those two internet Crowdsource the Truth broadcasters, George Webb and Jason Goodman, appear in hindsight to have willfully neglected to conduct due diligence as a reasonable inquiry into their source’s background,  prior to relying on that informant’s rumor. The finding by the U. S. Coast Guard that the dirty bomb rumor was false revealed that Webb’s reliance on his hidden source was a mirage.  Therefore this begs the question as to whether or not the promotion of this hoax as a monetized CSTT publicity stunt had been undertaken with the assurance of a protection agreement to  shield the participants with an immunity from criminal prosecution.

Why does an aura of impunity surround Webb and Goodman?

In November of 2018, Steve Outtrim of Cryptobeast  interviewed former CSTT researcher Queen Tut, who had exposed the identity of George Webb’s hidden source as a former FBI informant named Okey Marshall Richards.  She also described her understanding that Richards had been given the handle of Mr. Hudson by Jason Goodman, so that he could be featured as a regular guest on CSTT.  If that story is verified to be true, it would indicate that Jason Goodman, in a show of mockery, was featuring Richards in plain sight as a sign of impunity for getting away with their joint participation in the dirty bomb hoax as a criminal act.

Goodman has denied all responsibility, as seen in his Document 9-1, Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, filed August 3, 2018 in the D. George Sweigert vs. Jason Goodman RICO lawsuit.

Jason Goodman declared, “Plaintiff’s brother George W. Sweigert and George W. Sweigert’s associates were the initial source of information and went to great lengths to convince defendant that there was imminent and grievous danger to the public.  Defendant acted in good faith, reporting on open source information and information provided by Plaintiff’s associates, to alert authorities of possible danger and what defendant was caused to believe to be an imminent and serious public threat.”

Jason Goodman contemplates the world of his own creation: the justification of reckless and unrestrained speech as a new form of journalism called Crowdsource the Truth

Subsequent to this incident, various persons had speculated that this event was a government-sponsored psychological operation to restrict free speech on the internet.

That concern diverted the public’s focus away from the serious nature of this internet hoax, which had served to threaten our nation’s sensitive economic infrastructure.

Former CIA agent Robert David Steele, who downplayed George Webb’s role in the hoax, calling him a patsy, effectively cut the publicly viewed chain of accountability for the bomb hoax in half.

The remaining half of the visible part of the chain, Jason Goodman, as the sole owner of Crowdsource the Truth, is now the premier defendant in two separate federal civil lawsuits.  On September 1, 2017, Robert David Steele sued Jason Goodman, Patricia Negron and Queen Tut for defamation.  And on the one year anniversary of the Port of Charleston dirty bomb hoax, D. George Sweigert sued Jason Goodman in a civil RICO lawsuit.

As Ecclesiastes 8:11 wisely observes,  “because sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil.”  And so we continue to view a continuing stream of  false narratives on YouTube, which continue unfettered, as a result of the lack of criminal prosecution of the purveyors of the Port of Charleston hoax.

Back to the Future when accusations were RICOcheting as a self-fulfilling prophecy

In my files I have a partial transcription of a July  13, 2017  video uploaded by Defango on YouTube, called Crowdsource the Backlash/Defango is a Dangerous Criminal/RICO. 

In that video, Defango was in discussion with Dave Acton (Dave Sweigert)  concerning an on-air phone conversation between Dave and the hosts of Crowdsource the Truth; Jason Goodman, George Webb, and Trish Negron.

Dave Sweigert has a lengthy and impressive resume which includes an extensive educational and employment history in information security, and he has an ongoing, practical interest in American jurisprudence.  Jason Goodman once owned 21st Century 3D, and was employed as a 3-D cameraman in Hollywood.  George Webb (Sweigert) was a salesman prior to having his own YouTube channel, where he reports on political corruption.

Around the 2 minute mark of Defango’s video, a section of a Crowdsource the Truth video is replayed, as transcribed below.

Dave Acton:  There’s Trish in the middle.  Trish, I’m glad you’re laughing because I want to ask you about the ten years you spent on an audit committee of a Wall Street trading company, you know a lot about insider trading, don’t you?  You’ve been warned time and time again.  I know all those audit committee members have to sign statements about their knowledge.  Their knowledge of the corporation and prohibitions against insider trading so you’ve been warned and warned and warned.  If this is an insider trading stunt that you guys are planning to create a market crash- to create a Wall Street panic…

Jason Goodman:  Wall street?  Crash?

Dave Acton:  There’s evidence out there that’s what this is about…(over-talking by Jason)

Jason Goodman:…especially with the Maersk?

Dave Acton:  Alright, let’s go on…(3.14) (George Webb talks about Silk Airways)…(3.29)  You know he said yesterday that Seth Rich was  little league baseball game- it was a nothing – I thought that was what he built his career on.  George!  Now all of a sudden Seth Rich is nothing, and now it’s the Syrian weapons, and now it’s my brother Dave, OK?

Jason Goodman:  Say one thing about…Dave?  I want to invite him to join our broadcast, to report on it.  Yes, calm down, chill out, stop threatening us and just join us!

George Webb:  Wait till you see how much he can help you with the NATO Generals.

Jason Goodman:  I’m sure he could.

Dave Acton:  I want to know exactly what I’m supposed to know about NATO generals, since I’ve never met a NATO general.  I want to know what my knowledge is supposed to be about NATO generals.  Again, 10,000 people have heard this phantom of George’s that I’m involved with NATO generals.  How?  Tell me, George!  Explain to me how I’m involved with NATO generals and Syrian weapons transfers and human trafficking.

(Defango stops the audio to insert his explanation of a Twitter example of market manipulation.)

(6.03)  Dave Acton:…your ilk, but you want me to come on this show?  Because I really don’t want to be accessory to what you guys are planning.  As much as you run around collecting evidence with your conclusions, I could collect evidence right now saying, I think this is a planned market manipulation.  I think this is a planned panic.  I think they’re going to say there’s a dirty bomb in Manhattan.  I think they’re going to do it just the right way and the market’s going to close for about 4-5 minutes which is enough time to make billions of dollars.  All you internet researchers, all you people claiming that you love the internet- you don’t want to see it shut down…why don’t you look up the Associated Press Twitter hack in 2013?  Do some research, get off your…

(Defango interrupts to discuss the Twitter story and adds his comments on Trish Negron trading her shares out, moving money around…)

(7.24)  Dave Acton:  …your ass.  Go look it up right now, Associated Press Twitter Attack-White House-Obama’s been injured-bomb attack.  How many billions of dollars were lost in a minute and a half with a little rumor like that?  What do you think a big rumor like there’s a dirty bomb at Wall Street?  What do you think that would do?  These are the people that do it.  They would make millions of dollars – millions.  But unfortunately there’s a Racketeering Notice out there, isn’t there?  You guys are potential defendants in a racketeering case.  So if you make even one dime in a scenario like that you’ll just have to give it back – you’ll just have to give it back.

That’s why we have to do racketeering public notices.  So Jason, they’re not threats.  They’re prevention.  They’re protections for our country from the ilks of you.  I don’t see what you guys are accomplishing.  I don’t see what you’re contributing to public policy.  I don’t see what you’re doing – all I see is that you’re slandering me again and you’re bringing this whole scenario in that somehow there’s NATO generals that Dave can help us with.  I don’t want to be an accessory to market manipulation, that’s why I’m not going to be on your show.  I don’t want to be a co-conspirator – that’s why I’m not going to be on your show.  I suggest you guys lawyer up.

(12:46)  Jason Goodman:  (speaking of a previous Defango video)  What I’d like to know is if there is anyone in the Crowdsource community… I’m not going to sue him.  I’m not threatening him with a lawsuit.  (Defango overtalks Jason)  I’d like to know if there are any law enforcement professionals who can assist us with bringing charges of cyber bullying, cyber harassment, fraud.  Defango is repurposing our videos, he’s monetizing them, your (i.e. George Webb’s) brother Dave Acton gave him (i.e. Defango) $5.00 on air last night – THAT’S RICO, bro!  Dave Acton’s accused us of RICO.

Deliberate Acts Have A Motive  

The Port of Charleston shutdown faded away quickly from the collective memory of the American public; yet after two years, there still remain a few who desire to know the reasons behind the lack of prosecution of this hoax as a criminal offense.

If one reflects on the transcribed conversation above which places George Webb, Jason Goodman, and Trish Negron on one side of the Port of Charleston controversy, and Dave Acton (Dave Sweigert) on the other, there is a sharp line of demarcation. It is Dave Acton that draws that line, as he points out the movers and shakers of that hoax, possible motives, and possible future plans to enlarge the hoax for profiteering motives.

At that time, Acton attempted to restrain the actions of Crowdsource the Truth through what he terms racketeering public notices. Jason Goodman responded by deflecting this RICO application to his activities back on to Dave Acton. In subsequent months, Goodman, as the villain Antagonist used similar tactics of DEFLECTION to target hero Protagonist Dave “Acton” Sweigert, in this never ending YouTube drama.

The glitch in Jason Goodman’s fantasy island are two federal civil lawsuits against him

As previously mentioned, on Flag Day,  June 14, 2018, D. George Sweigert in the capacity of Private Attorney General, filed a federal CIVIL RICO lawsuit against Jason Goodman for the Port of Charleston dirty bomb hoax.  This court case was transferred from Charleston, South Carolina to the Eastern District of New York, where it now sits in mute silence, awaiting judicial response.

Just prior to the filing of the RICO lawsuit, Dave Sweigert filed several Declarations in the Robert David Steele defamation lawsuit against Jason Goodman.  Presently that lawsuit has entered the Discovery phase, and Dave Sweigert is awaiting judicial response to his motion to be an Intervenor plaintiff in the Steele lawsuit.

In the meantime, anyone who displeases Jason Goodman is being falsely accused (without evidentiary support) of being part of the actual originators or co-conspirators of that dirty bomb hoax.   It is astonishing to read in court documents that Jason Goodman, in spite of the penalty for perjury, has invented a false historical account of the Port of Charleston incident to escape his own accountability for that event.

Jason Goodman as a Walter Mitty type, where fantasy attempts to hold back reality

Jason Goodman’s demeanor 9 years ago, as seen in this DV Culture video, when he was promoting his 21st Century 3D  camera business, is vibrant and he seems very much in his element.

That personal style has not carried over into his Crowdsource the Truth interviews, where he is a fish out of water as a broadcast journalist, which requires both analytical skills and the practice of ethics.

Jason Goodman as seen in a short clip of DV Culture in 2010

As a contrast to another YouTuber,  Lionel Nation,  who has successfully transitioned  from a career as a trial lawyer to that of a solo broadcast commentator, Jason Goodman is entirely dependent upon his guests to provide any type of interesting commentary.

Another skill that sets Lionel Nation apart is his wonderful ability to relate with his viewers; a trait which was perfected as a trial attorney, who had to connect to both the jurors and the judge to successfully plead his case.

Jason Goodman, on the other hand, when he does a monologue, prefers to speak to his audience in his favored rant style, usually as a “rage” walk through the streets of New York.  This failure to interact naturally with others is encapsulated in the testimony of both Queen Tut and Quinn Michaels who have testified that Jason Goodman views young women as Tinder companions, in which he reveals his naked virility. There are numerous examples of Goodman defaming former associates, once they are no longer of value to him.

This use of others highly contrasts with our internet broadcaster example,  Lionel Nation, who frequently makes affectionate references to his wife, who is sitting near him in the background at their home or on their travels.  How one lives beyond the camera lens,  greatly influences the on-air presence of a broadcast journalist and thus the demographics of  the viewing audience.  Jason Goodman is greatly in error to argue that his opponents have the power to reduce his audience numbers; audience loyalty is contingent on their personal viewing relationship with the show host.

I mentioned earlier in this post,  the Walter Mitty aspect of Jason Goodman’s personality. The Wikipedia article on James Thurber’s short story The Secret Life of Walter Mitty, first published in The New Yorker in 1939 points out that “The name Walter Mitty and the derivative word ‘Mittyesque’ have entered the English language, denoting an ineffectual person who spends more time in heroic daydreams than paying attention to the real world, or more seriously, one who intentionally attempts to mislead or convince others that he is something that he is not.

Move over Washington Post!  Jason Goodman of Crowdsource the Truth has arrived!

For at least two years now, Jason Goodman of Crowdsource the Truth has been attempting to convince all thinking peoples that he is a broadcast journalist who has introduced to the world a powerful crowdsourcing form of journalism.  [see my June 6, 2018 article, Jason Goodman & Crowdsource the Truth:  The Fallacy of No Fault Journalism].

As recently as June 6, 2019, Jason Goodman was explaining (3.22) to guest Michael Volpe that “…now Crowdsource the Truth is all about having journalists and lawyers and politicians and law enforcement people and anyone who’s a witness to anything, come forward, bring their information forward and provide a platform for them to do that so we can collectively, as a community, crowdsource that information, vet it collectively, etc.”

Goodman adds, “Now that doesn’t mean that every single person who contacts me I’m gonna put on the show or that I’m somehow obliged to put them on the show.  I have my own process for vetting people.”

At the (4.21) mark, he explains, “…when I created Crowdsource the Truth, I was looking around at the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, Fox, MSNBC, all of these news agencies of record, where there are many people who are accredited journalists who have graduated from journalism schools and in some cases even won Pultizer Prizes.  And we’re seeing that many of these Pulitzer Prize winners have been reporting on totally fake news like this Russian hoax.  They get tons of things wrong even with massive staffs  of hundreds or even thousands of people to do this research; they don’t seem to be able to properly vet their sources so I’m not considering myself a journalist in the way that those people are journalists.”

“I’m trying to do a new process that relies on a crowdsource method so there are going to be people that slip under the wire and bring us false information and get on the air.  That’s certainly not the intent, and as always if someone has evidence that helps us understand a story better, that’s what we want whether it agrees or disagrees with the guest is irrelevant…”

Goodman  has substituted the long established high standards of investigative journalism for a viewer mob-ruled form of unsubstantiated reporting.  The effect of this so called “powerful” new form of journalism is that the content is often legally defamatory.

But Jason Goodman’s Greatest Conspiracy Theory is yet to be translated into Legalese

As the Walter Mitty styled defendant in the Robert David Steele federal civil defamation lawsuit, Goodman in his May 29, 2019, Document 118 provided under Background Information the following statement as a reason why he should not have to comply with the plaintiff’s Discovery requests.

He declared, “Defendant Goodman has alleged a conspiracy between Plaintiff, Intervenor Applicant, co-Defendant Lutzke/Holmes and numerous third parties.  This conspiracy is intended to disrupt, de-fund, defame, embarrass and otherwise frustrate the Defendant in an effort to chill Defendant’s journalistic efforts.  The conspiracy has been publicly acknowledged by Intervenor Applicant in a multiparty call, broadcast on YouTube as indicated by Defendant in previous pleadings (ECF No. 78 EXHIBIT A).  Any information gleaned from this instant legal action would almost assuredly be used to continue this effort.”  [ rds doc 118 may 29 2019]

Jason Goodman’s Days of Deflection began before the dirty bomb hoax

Let’s digress a bit to the aftermath of the June 14, 2017 Port of Charleston dirty bomb hoax, when George Webb and Jason Goodman first showed up on the Tracking the Leopard Meroz radar.

It was a month after that on July 13, 2017 that I posted my first article on this broadcast team, headlined as Jason Goodman In A Nutshell.  In that article, I began by quoting from a May 30, 2017 video uploaded on CSTT titled Hillary & McCabe’s Goons are Closing In:  Proof of Life from George Webb.

I report, “At the 7:12 mark of this preposterous video, George Webb who is acting as if his life is in danger, is thinking of what should be engraved on his tomb stone.”

George Webb: …so if I have an epitaph you know this is what I want it to say so…

Jason Goodman: right, George

George Webb: yeah, I, I, I haven’t been totally honest with you either; I think they picked you to ah document this so..

Jason Goodman:  What the hell are you talking about?

Finally Jason Goodman asks a good question!  And I commented in that article, “Now there is a fact checking question if I ever heard one. Too bad that this basic principle of  journalism is not being taught to these Crowdsourced Truthers.”

The poor helpless patsy:  not a brain in that pretty little head!

It is a documented fact that Robert David Steele, the former CIA agent, had handpicked George Webb to report on his #UNRIG campaign cross-country tour.  However, George Webb showed no reciprocal  interest in this project, and in the above dialogue we note that  George Webb is claiming that some hidden “they” had handpicked Jason Goodman to document “this”, whatever that means.

Jason Goodman had written as his video description, “With SEIU/FBI goons closing in, George calls with stunning revelations.  Johnny B can’t arrive quickly enough, I am being blocked from uploading to YouTube, trying at my end…Support this movement, become a sponsor of Crowdsource the Truth.”

So in Jason Goodman’s downgrade from a Hollywood 3-D cameraman to YouTube’s worst video of the week genre, Jason Goodman is attempting to use drama to snaggle some financial supporters.

In that same article, I ask, “So just who is this Jason Goodman who was picked to document George Webb? Why is it that in Jason Goodman’s Crowdsourcing videos, he appears to be technically inept? For example, his first interview with George Webb took place on a city roof top with so much background noise and phone glitches that he had to provide a transcript of their conversation. Some of his viewers suggested better methods of videotaping, in an effort to bring him into the 21st century.”  That statement is ironic, considering that Goodman’s business as a cameraman was 21st Century 3D.

Jason Goodman Displays the Subtle Art of Provocation

As I noted earlier, after D. George Sweigert filed his civil RICO lawsuit, Jason Goodman, as defendant replied with Documents 9, a Motion to Dismiss and 9-1, a Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, which were filed with the court on August 3, 2018.

Now Jason Goodman did a peculiar thing with Document 9/9-1.

For example, his Facts section provided one single spaced paragraph of 21 lines, typed in a small font, which made it highly difficult to read.  Also, the heading giving the identity of the Court was incomplete. Why did Jason Goodman deviate from standard rules for  federal court formatting of documents?

We know that Jason Goodman, as a Pro Se Defendant, was familiar with formatting rules because ten months earlier he had been sued by Robert David Steele in a federal civil defamation complaint.  In that Steele lawsuit, we can see in Document 44 dated April 30, 2018, that Goodman knew to use the proper headings, a larger type font, double line spacing, and paragraph breaks for easy readability.

Thus it appears that the deviation from court document formatting in the RICO lawsuit was a subtle expression of contempt for the Plaintiff D. George Sweigert. as well as the federal court system.

Alibis, the fictional storyboarding of #fakelawsuit  

Under the Facts section of Document 9-1 in the RICO lawsuit, Goodman claimed that the Plaintiff D. George Sweigert “has engaged in a more than one year long targeted harassment campaign” against him, utilizing various social media platforms and in coordination with a team of associates.”

He also asserted that the “Plaintiff has repeatedly engaged in behavior including knowingly  false information and making false statements in court filings both in this matter and an equally baseless matter filed in Virginia Federal Court by an associate of Sweigert.”

Goodman also added that “Plaintif (sp) has engaged in a plot to frame defendant Goodman for a bomb hoax perpetratd (sp) by Plaintif (sp) brother George W. Sweigert and assoiates (sp), including members of the fraudulent suit filed in Virginia.  Plaintiff make a regular practice of misusing the legal system for vindictive and punitive purposes as part of his elaborate efforts to harass his victims…”.

Under Goodman’s Argument section, he provides his alibi for his participation in the Port of Charleston dirty bomb hoax, saying in part, “Plaintiff’s brother George W. Sweigert and George W. Sweigert’s associates were the initial source of information and went to great lengths to convince defendant that there was imminent and grievous danger to the public.  Defendant acted in good faith, reporting on open source information and information provided by Plaintiff’s associates, to alert authorities of possible danger and what defendant was caused to believe to be an imminent and serious public threat.”

In honor of those who quietly and steadfastly serve to protect America’s fragile economic infrastructures

As the Days of Deflection campaign of Jason Goodman continues with a never ending,  monotonous, repetition of his false legal narrative, we must recall that it was Dave Sweigert who drew the Line of Division in this battle in that CSTT July 13, 2017 video.

And it was Dave Sweigert who was attempting to protect our nation’s economic infrastructure from  internet hoaxes when he ALONE filed a civil RICO lawsuit against Jason Goodman.

While that RICO lawsuit sits quietly in a backlogged court system, our attention is drawn to the  Robert David Steele defamation lawsuit in the June 6, 2019, filing of Document 122, which asks the court for sanctions against Jason Goodman.

In the Introduction of that document, it begins, “Throughout this proceeding, Defendant Goodman has made a fool of himself and others by publishing videos on YouTube and statements via social media that malign Plaintiffs and promote Goodman’s proclamation that this action is a “#fakelawsuit” by a “real idiot”.

Plaintiff Steele’s memorandum goes on to state that “the filing of this action did nothing to deter Goodman’s insalubrious, truculent and unlawful use of YouTube.  To the contrary, after being sued Goodman escalated his campaign of defamation and character assassination.”  On page 5, Document 122 states, “The false representations in ECF No. 78 violate Rule 11 (b)(1) and Rule 11(b)(3).  They are presented for the improper purpose of harassing Plaintiffs and needlessly and vexatiously multiplying this proceeding.  There is no evidentiary support for Goodman’s statements.”

And in that last sentence, therein lies the problem of Jason Goodman and his Crowdsource the Truth broadcasts.

Have a wonderful Flag Day this next week, and let us all display a deep regard for our hard-won freedoms, which our flag represents.

 

 

Advertisements

Robert David Steele vs. Jason Goodman Document 118: Goodman Objects to Discovery Request

On May 29, 2019, Document 118 was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division in the Robert David Steele et. al. vs. Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit.

Document 118  (35 pages) Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff Robert David Steele’s First Request for Production of Documents & Motion to Stay Discovery

rds doc 118 may 29 2019

Earth Intelligence Network – “That Other Plaintiff” in the Robert David Steele Lawsuit

Today we are going to review Earth Intelligence Network’s  990-EZ  tax return which was filed for 2017,- the year in which Robert David Steele’s #UNRIG campaign was launched.

In addition, we are going to examine this non-profit organization’s profile on Guidestar.com.   In this profile, Robert David Steele, as President of Earth Intelligence Network, is referred to as the Pro Bono CEO.  The term pro bono denotes work which is done without charge.    Yet in 2017 this so-called Pro Bono CEO was compensated $50,813.  This contradiction alone is reason to take the time to compare and contrast the 990 with the information on Guidestar’s profile. 

A Recent Iranian Interview which hearkened back to the problems which the #UNRIG campaign encountered in 2017

On March 20, 2019, the Tehran Times, Iran’s Leading International Daily,  featured Robert David Steele in an interview headlined, New Zealand False Flag Event:  Zionist Provocation to Disarm US White Nationalists and start World War III?  One of the questions posed to Steele by the interviewer caught my eye because it tied in with today’s topic.

The interviewer said, “You are a Christian, a white nationalist,  but also a Latino of a Colombian mother, who has lived all over the world as the son of an oil engineer, as a Marine Corps infantry officer, and as a spy.  You only became an anti-Zionist when they destroyed your #UNRIG election reform program co-founded with the great Dr. Cynthia McKinney.  What is your final word to all Muslims on this matter?”

Although I had read Steele’s admission some time ago, that he is a lapsed Columbian Jesuit altar boy, it was only recently that I had read that he calls himself a Christian.  Back in 2017, I spent several days reading a sampling of Robert David Steele’s book reviews.  Thus in an article dated March 21, 2018, called And in this Corner:  A Man called SUE Contending Against Leviathan, Behemoth and God Almighty!, I took note of an odd remark made by Robert David Steele, as he was visiting with Benjamin Fulford in Inokashira Park, Japan.

I wrote, “This 20 minute interview took place on a lovely day among  beautiful Japanese gardens.  At the 9.04 mark, Robert David Steele inserted into the conversation a  remark which gives insight into his own soul, saying “…I read a book called Caesar’s Messiah and it’s an absolutely extraordinary juxtaposition of The Wars of the Jews by Titus and his descendants, and the New Testament, and it makes the case that the Bible and Christianity, the Catholic Church, were actually created as the first major psychological operation by Caesar and his descendants to basically tell people to turn the other cheek and render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s.”

Robert David Steele seems to think he can call himself a Christian while at the same time promoting the false historical narrative that Caesar had created the Bible and Christianity as a means to uphold godless statism.  This Union of Opposing Principles to achieve an end is an occult principle, and we have seen Steele employ that very concept in his #UNRIG campaign, when for example, when he joined Alt Right with Alt Left in a unified front.

An expert on False Flags?

The Tehran Times Interview centers on Robert David Steele’s CIA background in false flag operations, which ties into his #UNRIG campaign sponsored by his non-profit corporation Earth Intelligence Network.

The Amazon.com listing on False Flag Attacks:  A Tool of the Deep State (Trump Revolution Book 12) dated June 7, 2017 by Robert David Steele Vivas, says, “Included in this offering is the table of contents for the forthcoming #13 in the Trump Revolution series, Taking Down the Deep State:  A Presidential Briefing.  It is possible for We the People to take back the power in the next 120 days, particularly if Donald Trump, Rand Paul and Tulsi Gabbard join Cynthia McKinney and I in mobilizing a national conversation in June and the occupation of the front lawns and home offices of every Member of Congress during the summer recess when they cannot hide from constituents.”

Underneath that paragraph Steele advertises #UNRIG.  The 2nd American Revolution has begun, but only each of you can–in the aggregate, in Unity for Integrity–finish the job.

In other words, Robert David Steele on June 7, 2017, was calling for a major protest-styled harassment of individual members of Congress, by occupying the front lawns of their homes.  This was one week prior to the June 14, 2017 shutdown of the Port of Charleston which was in direct response to George Webb’s tip from a hidden source that a dirty bomb was aboard the Memphis Maersk.

This false report was aired on Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource the Truth, and curiously even after that shocking incident,  Robert David Steele pursued YouTube broadcaster George Webb as his favored choice for an on-the-scenes reporter for his #UNRIG campaign tour of the nation.  It was on June 13, 2017, that these two men met in a restaurant and broadcast a fundraiser on CSTT to benefit #UNRIG, of which Susan Lutzke aka Queen Tut donated $25.  After the Port of  Charleston incident, Steele absolved Webb of complicity, by declaring him to be nothing more than an unwitting patsy.

The Amazon.com listing for Steele’s False Flag book, displays an inside peek, and the  screenshot below displays some interesting quotes.  For example, note this phrase of a  “dedicated counterintelligence endeavor, perhaps jointly with Russia.”  Also, of interest is the loaded language declaring, “#UNRIG is the manifesto and the road map for the 2nd American Revolution.”

Earth Intelligence Network is a non-profit organization, which means that it is receiving tax benefits which are subsidized by American taxpayers.  Although many such non-profit corporations manage to stay within the IRS guidelines, it is clear that those promoting a political agenda do so under thinly veiled educational efforts.  Thus the donors provide the bread, and the the non-profit provides the bologna.

 

Robert David Steele is a White Nationalist?

I was surprised by the Tehran interviewer’s use of the word white nationalist, and Robert David Steele does not deny that descriptor of him; rather he embraces this controversial label saying, “I would say this to all Muslims:  we white nationalists embrace Latinos and blacks and Muslims who are committed to God and country, to freedom and tolerance.”

Steele adds, “We also share with all Muslims one big challenge:  It is impossible to learn the truth from the US Government, from any government, or from the media, because all of the channels of communications are controlled.  I am reminded that the Prime Minister of Malaysia some years ago called for a Muslim Press Service because the Zionists control the world press and demonize Muslims.  Now they are demonizing white nationalists.”

Robert David Steele, like any politician who believes “the end justifies the means”, is described by Jude 1:6, These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts;  and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men’s persons in admiration because of advantage.  Certainly the statement that Zionists control the world press, is a complaint meant to patronize the readers of the Tehran Times, for facts stand in cold defiance of such a broad statement.

What impact did the defamation against #UNRIG have on fulfilling their purposes?

The specific answer to that question is one which will be settled in a federal court of law, after the Judge and a jury examine all of the evidence presented in the Robert David Steele, et. al. vs. Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit.

But as the alleged defamation was featured in the public domain, it needs to be observed that this legal complaint involving Earth Intelligence Network’s #UNRIG project centers around several persons that actually promoted the June 13, 2017 fundraising efforts on Crowdsource the Truth.

Despite all of the accusations between the plaintiffs and defendants in the Robert David Steele lawsuit, based on the 2017 990 for Earth Intelligence Network, Steele claimed he was able to reach 5 million people on internet platforms and a cross country tour.  Thus on the surface the comment made by the Tehran interviewer to Steele, that “You only became an anti-Zionist when they destroyed your #UNRIG election reform program…”, is a conclusion which does not accurately describe the actual facts of that  situation.

So who just who are these so-called Zionists who supposedly destroyed his #UNRIG election reform program?  The facts of this story challenge the rhetoric.

On September 1, 2017, Robert David Steele and his non-profit corporation Earth Intelligence Network filed a defamation lawsuit against three individuals:  Jason Goodman, a Jewish man who broadcasts interviews on his Crowdsource the Truth YouTube channel; a CSTT co-host, Patricia Negron; and a repeat guest speaker who was presented to viewers as a hidden source researcher with the pseudonym Queen Tut.

Yet almost 2 years later, Robert David Steele has yet to sue any of these Zionist groups in federal courtIn most states, the statute of limitations on defamation is one year.

A review of the 2017 990-EZ filed on Earth Intelligence Network of Virginia, EIN #20-8286516

Robert David Steele, as President of Earth Intelligence Network, filed the 990 we are reviewing, on May 9, 2018.  This is a revision of a 2017 990 form that Steele had filed a month earlier on April 9, 2018.  (It does not appear that the usual procedure for Amending a Tax Return was observed in this instance.)

On the Supplemental Information form, Steele explains, “2017 was a break-out year, UNTIL the non-profit was ruthlessly attacked.  2017 saw Earth Intelligence Network (EIN) grievously attacked with deliberate persistent defamatory campaigns across the internet focused on destroying our fund-raising business and our ability to gain attention to our cause.  This was so bad that a federal lawsuit had to be filed and can be viewed (both the original and the 97 page amended complaints), at http://tinyurl.com/Steele-vs-Goodman.  Note:  Legal counsel retained on contingency basis. No legal fees paid.”

In 2017, Earth Intelligence Network received $191,260 in donations,as compared to the four years prior:  2013 ($5,507),  2014 ($78,413),  2015 ($25,553), and in 2016 ($13,087).  Out of that five year revenue period totaling $313,820, the year 2017 represented 61% of all donations, at a time when this non-profit was maligned on the internet.

Under the 990-EZ section called Statement of Program Service Accomplishments, Steele describes line 28 ($117,159), as “After the President stated that ‘the system is rigged’, created an educational civics campaign, #UNRIG, to educated citizens on twelve election reform possibilities that would restore integrity to Congress.  Reached over five million people via YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and direct contact on a 9,000 mile national tour.

Line 29 of program accomplishments shows $59,143, described as, “Continued the previously established program to educate citizens on the value and need for Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) as a foundation for transparent decision-making by all forms of organization.  With multiple publications, ultimately recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2017.”

Chief Counsel Robert David Steele of ITNJ

And on line 30 ($10,000), Steele “created new civics education program focused on elite pedophilia, inclusive of sponsorship of a new free online book, Pedophilia & Empire:  Satan, Sodomy & The Deep State by Joachim Hagopian, viewable at http://tinyurl.com/pedoempire.  Accepted role as unpaid Commissioner in new Commission of Inquiry.    [This commission is the International Tribunal for Natural Justice (ITNJ) where Robert David Steele is named as Chief Counsel, although he is not an attorney.  See Tracking the Leopard Meroz article of September 16, 2018, “THE OATH Above all Oaths of Robert David Steele, Chief Counsel for the International Tribunal for Natural Justice”.]

To summarize, the 2017 990-EZ for Earth Intelligence Network shows total Revenues of $191,260 which included public contributions of $174,425, program service revenue (incl. government fees and contracts) of $9,000, and other revenue as $6,835. Robert David Steele claims he worked 80 hours/week in 2017 and he  compensated himself in the amount of $50,813. Professional fees and other payments to independent contractors totaled $26,973.  Other expenses totaling $97,998 are described in Schedule O, which can be viewed here in this PDF:  rds 990 2017 earth intelligence network

What information does Guidestar.org have on Earth Intelligence Network?

One of the first things to note is that the Guidestar profile shows that Earth Intelligence Network, which received its IRS tax exemption in 2008 has Robert David Steele as the CEO (Pro Bono). As we saw in the 2017 990-EZ, Robert David Steele was paid $50,813; thus this pro bono designation is incorrect.

The 3 primary missions given by Steele are as follows:

  •  To expose #Google Gestapo and the means by which its elements censor, manipulate, and digitally assassinate conservative and progressive voices that challenge the Deep State & Shadow Government narrative known as “fake news” and to provide the truth where it can be found on “false flag” events used to justify a police state at home and perpetual war abroad.  see https://phibetaiota.net.
  • #UNRIG Unity for Integrity–Election Reform Act Proposed, see http://unrig.net
  • Education of the public on pedophilia; Robert serves as a Commissioner and Chief Counsel for the treaty-mandated judicial Commission of Inquiry into Human Trafficking and Child Sex Abuse.  see https://commission.itnj.org/
  • A fourth mission which is contained in a Note states “EIN has devised core concepts for a School of Future-Oriented Hybrid Governance, a PHD in Comprehensive Architecture, and a World Brain Institute.  EIN seeks a university partner that will embrace and execute these ideas while raising $100 million.  EIN seeks nothing for itself, only attention to its ideas.

Under What We Aim to Solve, Robert David Steele says, “We live in a fake world where everything has been scripted to concentrate wealth and power among the 1% and keep the 99% dumbed down and drugged up.  All eight of the major institutional categories (academia, civil society, commerce, government, law enforcement, media, military, and non-profit) are corrupt to the bone-90% good people trapped in bad systems, but the top 10% under the thumb of the Central Banks that in turn represent the Deep State.”

Guidestar asks What are the organizations’s current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?  Steele describes his programs in an evasive manner, stating “Open Source Intelligence (OSINT):  To provide the President, Cabinet, commanders, Congress, and the public with the 96% of the decision-support they cannot get from either the US secret intelligence community or their own staffs that do not know how to “do” decision-support rooted in holistic analytics and true cost economics.  Decisions today are ‘pay to play’ decisions in which neither the facts nor the public interest are considered.”  He says that the population served is General/unspecified; however his budget for all of the above is a mere $50,000.

The population served and budget of $50,000 is also the same for his #UNRIG-Unity for Integrity (Election Reform Act Proposed).  Steele explains that “#UNRIG brings together twelve specific reforms crafted by thousands of activists over the years, but all marginalized because no organization has the balls to call out the two-party tyranny for what it is:  a front for the Deep State and the Shadow Government that treat the 99% as exploitable beings.”

And finally, as if those two goals were not all encompassing of Robert David Steele’s 80 hours/ week work effort, his third goal is to End Pedophilia & Murderous Pedophilia.  He remarks, “The elite are Satanic in fact and they consume vast amounts of children in three ways:  for their blood and bone marrow; for their energy in the pre-puberty torture stage; and as disposable objects for Satanic rituals demanding the snuffing of children’s lives (generally children with no birth certificate or passport, easily disposed of in controlled incinerators).”  The population served for this mission is children and youth (0-19 years).  And again, the budget is $50,000.

In summary: for the three missions of Earth Intelligence Network, each had a $50,000 budget, totaling $150,000. Thus when we view the 2017 990-EZ which showed revenues of $191,260 and expenses of $186,302, leaving a net fund balance $5617, it is apparent that a target of a $150,000 budget was amply met.  If the Pro Bono CEO had not compensated himself with $50,813 there would have been more funds available for #UNRIG.

As I recall, Steele had desired to raise $250,000 for his #UNRIG campaign in 2017, but given the past history of his non-profit and his Guidestar statements showing that he regards a reasonable budget for #UNRIG to be $50,000, it would appear that his wish list in 2017 was not based on realistic expectations.

Guidestar’s Charting Impact Questions

Guidestar has a self-reporting section called Charting Impact:  Five powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters-results.

Question 1:  What is the organization aiming to accomplish?  Answer by Robert David Steele:   “Wake people up by repeating truths as often as possible.  The truth about 9/11 may be the single most effective option to date, but 5G is rapidly emerging as something so terrible–genocide and ecocide in one package–that it might surpass 9/11.

[What happened to child trafficking, election reform and Open Source Information?]

Question 2:  What are the organization’s key strategies for making this happen?  Answer:  Robert David Steele references his free websites, etc. and dreamily states, “it is my hope that just one billionaire will recognize that the sole foundation for human peace and prosperity is the human–the 99% in the aggregate.  That is our seed corn. An Open Source Agency has been twice approved by the Office of Management and Budget, but the CIA keeps blocking it because the absolute last thing they want is an informed President, Congress, and public.” And he links to his Presidential Innovation Memorandum on one of his websites.

[Say, can you prove that the CIA is blocking your efforts?  I thought it was the Zionists.]

Question 3:  What are the organization’s capabilities for doing this?  Answer:  One man, one voice.  We had an excellent campaign going for #UNRIG but it scared the crap out of the Zionists because they saw that an honest election process resulting in an honest Congress would assure America First, not Zionism first.  So they attacked us six ways in 90 days, taking us down from raising $29,000 a month to $200 a month.  That story is told at http://tinyurl.com/Google Gestapo. [see Tracking Meroz article dated November 12, 2017 titled, “ROBERT DAVID STEELE & His List of Crowdstalkers and Co-Conspirators:  Is Your Name On This List?]

Question 4:  How will they know if they are making progress?  Answer: The President will execute the ideas at http://tinyurl.com/Trump Triumph, and prior to Election Day, ideally on the 4th of July 2019, do 9/11 disclosure as he promised, sharing with the public the truths contained in http://tinyurl.com/911-POTUS as delivered to the White House on 8 August 2018.

[Yikes!  July 4, 2019 is right around the corner!]

Question 5:  What have they accomplished so far and what’s next?  Answer:  Am still alive and still writing.  I care deeply about both teaching and learning.  We are at war among ourselves at three levels:  Level 1:  Physical and secular-for power.  Level 2:  Earth–genocide and ecocide by the 1% against the 99%.  Level 3:  Cosmic–Einstein had it right, it’s all about energy, dark energy and light energy are in a cosmic battle for the soul of humanity.

[RDS is still alive after fighting the Deep State with tax exempt donations?  I find that highly suspicious!  And that last sentence is to say the least, a very strange answer to the question. Why on earth is the American taxpayer subsidizing the Moonlighting Operation of a political revolutionary X-CIA agent who has insider knowledge of slave camps on Mars?]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rudy Davis Asks God to Curse A Prison Warden but he ought to take heed of these Cautionary Tales of “The Downfall of the Unmanageable Shill”

Hal Turner and National Socialist Movement Nazis

Once upon a time Shock Jock and White Supremist Hal Turner thought he could not be held responsible for his words, as he played everyone for gain as an on again-off again paid FBI informant. As he became the Unmanageable Shill, Turner brazenly tried to extort his FBI handler.

Of late we have been observing the downfall of another internet host, who has embellished his civil court documents with a conspiratorial twist to place the blame for his own actions on other people. One day that ongoing story will be retold as a Campfire Tale of Horror, but in today’s post my caution is directed to Rudy Davis of LoneStar1776 who sidesteps the laws governing unprotected threatening speech, by invoking the name of God in imprecatory prayers against law enforcement officers and judges.

What has Christianity to do with Shock Jock Manipulators?

Alternative Media internet hosts and their guests often exhibit an anti-government, anti-judiciary bias that runs like an underground stream, beneath the terra firma of the self-indignant, self justified world of the Shock Jock broadcaster. This philosophical bent has nothing to do with a genuine Christian belief in the Scriptures dealing with justice and  legitimate governmental authority.

Consider the following example of Pete Santilli, who was known for his foul mouth and Shock Jock opinions. Some will recall that on February 12, 2015, Pete Santilli exposed himself in a Shock Jock brief phone call to the office of Judge Rodgers, who was presiding over the trial of Kent Hovind.

At that time, other self-proclaimed Christian internet broadcasters such as Doug Hagmann, Steve Quayle, and Dave Daubenmire were likewise promoting the false legal narrative of the “innocence” of Kent Hovind.  The instigator of that unified storyline appears to have been Rudy Davis, the Christian Chaplain of the LoneStar1776 YouTube channel, who signifies his mission with a I Hate the FBI slogan.

Pete Santilli’s YouTube channel was later suspended; thus the video which featured his phone call to Judge Rodgers has disappeared from the internet.  However, Robert Baty had transcribed that particular phone call on his kehvrlb.com website.

Before reading a portion of that phone call below, consider that  Title 18, United States Code, Section 115(a)(1)(B), the statute under which Hal Turner had been convicted, prohibits threats to assault or murder United States judges with the intent to impede, intimidate, or interfere with them while they are engaged in the performance of their official duties or with the intent to retaliate against them on account of their official duties.

Although Pete Santilli’s phone call represents a more nebulous manner of intimidation, it is clear that his intention was to threaten a Judge in an ongoing trial from making a decision that departed in any way from Santilli’s opinion.

The phone call began, “Tell her, my name is Pete Santilli, OK!  Santilli, S-a-n-t-i-l-l-I.  I understand she’s got a little bit, a little bit of a problem with Christians.  Namely Pastor Hovind.  And she’s abusing her black robe:  her power and authority on the bench.  And I am going to tell you something right now.  We’re whipping up the biggest firestorm that she’ll ever see.  First of all, she needs to recuse herself from that case.  I am going to demand that on behalf of all Christians in the United States of America, OK.  Your system, we have it all figured out. OK.”

“The communist regime that has a strangle hold on our government using the judiciary to go after people like Pastor Hovind, using the IRS in a very hypocritical fashion whereas you don’t go after Al Sharpton and Timothy Geithner, OK.  Going after Pastor Hovind will not stand, OK.  She should recuse herself.  She has tremendous bias.  We have her on the record for what she has stated is not acceptable and conduct unbecoming of a judge, OK.  So, I’d like to call upon her to just remove herself or face the wrath of the people here in the United States of America.  They are going to come against her:  make sure, basically, she will be unemployed.…See you at the trial; semper fi.” (End of call).

After the call,  Pete Santilli continues speaking, “Frickin’ pigs.  I’m sick of this system.  I’m fed up, aren’t you fed up? I’m serious.  I’m literally…I’m also upset at the following…How many people do we need to send down there to get him released?”

Eventually Shock Jock Pete Santilli found himself  incarcerated for 600+ days in regard to the Cliven Bundy/Nevada “Bunkerville” encounter with government officials.

Jason Goodman and Larry Klayman’s view of Santilli as a double crosser

Almost a year ago, on June 12, 2018, Jason Goodman was live on the Pete Santilli Show. However, when Santilli later filed an official BAR complaint against attorney Larry Klayman, Jason Goodman was placed in the awkward position of having to favor one guest over the other, and in the end it was Larry Klayman who was brought to the forefront of  Crowdsource the Truth, and Santilli was shelved.  As of May 15, 2019, Robert David Steele is requesting Discovery documents from Jason Goodman that center around his communications with several CSTT guests, including attorney Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch.

At the 37.50 mark of this June 12, 2018 show, Jason Goodman discusses attorney Larry Klayman, saying, “I always like to promote Larry’s website and what Larry is doing because it’s you know, there’s not that many lawyers out there…there’s not that many lawyers out there with integrity. Larry is one of them.” The recent Discovery document 113 filed May 15, 2019, in the Robert David Steele defamation lawsuit, requests copies of communications between Jason Goodman and Larry Klayman.

Shock Jock Hal Turner Received the Shock of his life when he had to live with those he Double Crossed.

Returning to our discussion of Shock Jock Hal Turner, the headline for a Jersey Journal nj.com article written by Michaelangelo Conte on May 18, 2011, declared Convicted North Bergen Internet Radio Host fears life in prison unit with notorious terrorists.  Interestingly, at that time, one of those prisoners in that feared unit, Russell Landers, was later to became one of Rudy Davis’ LoneStar 1776 so-called American Political Prisoners.  No doubt most federal prisoners hate the FBI, so it is little wonder that Hal Turner who was an on again-off again paid FBI informant, thought he was going to be murdered in prison.

Turner’s “rabid commentaries on his internet radio show made him a magnet for hate groups such as the Aryan Nation, Ku Klux Klan and Nazis” who loved his rhetoric.  Yet he was not loyal to these groups because of his love for money.  It appears that he never considered that he might end up incarcerated in the Terre Haute, Indiana Communications Management Unit (CMU)which house notorious White Supremists and Muslim terrorists. The Jersey Journal article quoted Turner as saying, “I probably won’t even see it coming,” and “They are facilitating my murder by putting me in the direct physical presence of the very terrorists  I defended the nation from”.  In reality, Turner served his sentence, and was able to re-enter a more subdued reality in society. However, as we will discuss later in this article, another prisoner associated with Rudy Davis’ prison ministry WAS murdered in that same CMU.

Hal Turner’s Government Sentencing Memorandum Discusses Unprotected Speech

Turner was convicted of threatening to kill three Chicago judges and sentenced to 3 years in prison.  The United States District Court, Eastern District of New York’s 13 page Government Sentencing Memorandum for United States v. Turner can be read in full on Wikisource.org.

This memorandum explains that because of a federal court ruling which Hal Turner disliked, he attempted to “intimidate the three judges”, as he “switched from offering his opinion on the merits of the decision to threatening death to the judges…The differences between political commentary with which Turner tries to affiliate himself and the threatening postings in this case are stark.  Turner’s statements in the charged postings were not general exhortations about political conditions but were instead targeted attacks against three individuals whom Turner desired to intimidate by methodically identifying them and placing them before his Internet audience on a spot lit platter…Turner not only used violent language in his postings but he intentionally linked violent phrases and graphic images with the three judges themselves (“walk up to them and kill them”…)”.

(page 4) “Threats of violence in general, moreover, are both unprotected by the First Amendment and inimical to it.  In this case, when Turner used the Internet to issue threats of violence, he sought not to persuade, but to coerce by intimidation.  Turner traded on fear of violence in a way that has no place within the marketplace of ideas.  Like other classes of punishable speech, true threats serve “no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.”  Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U. S. 568, 571-572 (1942).”

“There is another reason why threats of violence constitute unprotected speech-they instill fear in their victims.  No matter whether a threatener carries out an attack, his victim lives under a cloud of uncertainty as to whether or when the threatened violence will be meted out.  Seldom do the threat victims have the luxury of minimizing, much less eliminating, the risk of an attack.  They must carry on with their lives, facing the grim possibility of a violent attack against themselves or their loved ones.”

(page 5)  “Turner’s earlier public statements and private emails also demonstrate that Turner reacts with venomous fury and uses his public platforms and Internet access to instill fear when someone expresses views contrary to his own or levies criticism  against him personally….Turner has spent years trying to undermine the judicial independence in all types and at all levels of courts….by attempting to coerce judges to render decisions based on fear and not on the law. Turner used his website, radio broadcasts, emails, and personal correspondence as platforms to disseminate information about judges’ rulings with exhortations about violence against the judges that should be levied in response.”

“Turner claimed during his trials in the instant case that he issued these criticisms in his public persona as a shock jock.  But the hard reality is that the Turner harsh words about these targeted judges, launched by Turner to an audience containing members of violent and extreme groups, prompted the United States Marshall’s Service to assign protective details to many of the judges for extended periods of time.  The intensity of Turner’s postings about judges increased substantially between April 10, 2006 and February 20, 2007, when Turner was not open as an FBI source.”

(page 7)  “Turner has also consistently demonstrated that he has no respect for the law.  Turner lied under oath…he demonstrated his disregard for the seriousness of his offense by sending text messages to Agent Haug (his handler agent) in an effort to intimidate him into silence.”

(page 10)  “The relationship between the FBI and Turner, however, was a stormy one”..(page 11)  “The FBI admonished Turner about the danger of using these public forums to incite individuals to commit acts of violence based on Turner’s inflammatory statements…the FBI closed Turner twice as a source due to his dangerous rhetoric and serious control problems…Turner’s persistent effort to extort the FBI after the FBI cut him off as a confidential source…”

Rudy Davis curses, in the name of God,  the Warden for the Terre Haute CMU

It might be interesting to discuss unprotected free speech which is disingenuously disguised as religious free speech, spoken in the name of God, to threaten government officials.  Even if one is confident that God will not answer the prayer request, will some misguided soul consider it his duty to fulfil the petition in the name of his religion?

In Christian theology, the law of God is equivalent to the will of God.  I John 5:14-15 addresses the subject of answered prayer,saying, And this is the confidence that we have in him, that, if we ask any thing according to his will, he heareth us:  and if we know that he hear us, whatsoever we ask, we know that we have the petitions that we desired of him.

Rudy Davis has extensively marked his Bible, so he ought to understand the whole counsel of God in regard to judgment and justice

So what happens to frivolous prayers spoken in the name of God?

Viewers of Rudy Davis’ Lonestar 1776 YouTube channel have observed the many imprecatory prayers that Davis has declared, requesting the destruction and/or death of various persons.  Despite Rudy Davis’ pretensions to legal ignorance of the American system of jurisprudence, he is in fact exhibiting a keen attention to the enforcement of law with every imprecatory prayer he utters, as seen in the above video screenshot.

For prayers to be answered, there is a basic requirement that the petitioner to the throne of heaven state the facts accurately and apply the Scriptural law appropriately.   The Frivolous Man, the Double Crosser, the Hypocrite and Shock Jocks are not countenanced by the Judge in heaven, just as they are not by American federal judges who have admonished that “The judicial forum is a place in which serious people attend to serious business.” Morris v. Jenkins, 819 F.2d 678, 682 (7th Cir. 1987). In addition, when it comes to appeals, “[T]he judicial system cannot tolerate litigants who refuse to accept adverse decisions.” Homola v. McNamara, 59 F.3d 647, 651 (7th Cir. 1995).

Rudy Davis provided this video description for his May 6, 2019, Lonestar1776 You Tube broadcast called, More Rejected Mail to Schaeffer Cox: May God Almighty Place Massive Hemorrhoids on Warden J. R. Bell in CMU in Terre Haute, Indiana“.

On what basis does Rudy Davis expect to have that prayer answered?  

The danger of frivolous prayers is that they will be cast aside by God, or worse, return as a curse against the person who prayed with a malicious and defamatory intent.

The May 6th Rudy Davis imprecatory prayer is based on two complaints against Warden Bell; the return of mail not in compliance with prison guidelines,  and a prior homicide of an incarcerated felon in the CMU.  Rudy Davis makes the astonishing claim that that murdered felon “Robert David Neal could have been beheaded“.   I assume that the curse of massive hemorrhoids is related to Rudy Davis’ malicious surmisings that the Warden might be a transsexual.

It does not appear that the manner in which Robert David Neal was murdered is public knowledge

Mywabashvalley.com posted an article on November 14, 2018, reporting that, “Terre Haute, IN-Authorities are investigating the death of an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Terre Haute.  On Saturday, 68-year-old Robert Neal was found unresponsive at the facility.  He was pronounced dead by the Vigo County Coroner.  The FBI was notified and the incident is being investigated as an apparent homicide… Neal was sentenced in the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas to 327 months for Wire Fraud and Aiding and Abetting.  He had been in custody at FCI Terre Haute since December 20, 2010…”.

An eyewitness from the prison described that incident as follows:

December 2, 2018 Lonestar 1776 video image

Rudy Davis’ Prayer

Rudy Davis begins his imprecatory prayer video against Warden Bell, saying, “Peace and blessings.  It’s Monday, May the 6, the year 2019 and even though nobody’s paying attention, nobody seems to care, I’m gonna keep speaking the truth anyway if I’m the only one that’s talking.  Um, you see we got a secret prison;  it’s called a communications management unit and they torture and they murder people in a secret prison that was put together without the proper funding, without the proper oversight of Congress.  You say, why do you say that?  Because I got a letter from Congress that proves it.  And they used this prison to put charismatic people like Schaeffer Cox and to torture him and to break his will and to control all his communications.”

“So they banned myself, they banned my wife, when I say “they”, I’m talking about the son of Belial Warden J. R. Bell and I pray that God sends a massive case of hemorrhoids to Warden J. R. Bell, who is the warden of Terre haute, Indiana prison who keeps blocking all my mail, won’t let me communicate with Schaeffer, rejects everything that I send, I pray that God interrupts any relationship that Warden J. R. Bell tries to have with his wife, although he could be a transgender person, he could have a husband, I don’t know what his orientation is, but whoever he considers his loved ones in this earth, whether it be his children or his family, I pray they become estranged to him and that he cannot have a good relationship with his family, because he is an incredibly wicked man who I believe has oversaw the murder of Robert David Neal in November of 2018.  He’s tried to cover it up.  He won’t let anyone write any letters to the prisoners.”

“We get very few letters out from the prisoners and what little we do know is that there is no way that Robert David Neal could have been beheaded and murdered, beheaded by the Muslims without the consent and the approval of the authorities of that prison.  What else do we know about Robert David Neal?  We know that Robert David Neal had a pending lawsuit against the BOP director, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. with a massive legal list of abuses.  We also have a phone call-multiple phone calls from Robert David Neal stating that he had been hospitalized and beaten previously as retaliation for his legal efforts against the BOP.  So there’s a pattern of abuse, torture and beatings of Robert David Neal…”.  (3.03)

The Communication Management Unit (CMU) at Terre Haute

The Federal Correctional Complex at Terre Haute, Indiana has high, medium and minimum security units housing 3,000 inmates; included in this complex is a Special Confinement Unit for federal death-row inmates, and a Communications Management Unit (CMU) that severely restricts all outside communication of inmates.

According to a Wikipedia article Communication Management Unit, this specialized federal prison unit was created, “As part of the Bush Administration’s War on Terrorism, the April 3, 2006, Federal Register included proposed rules by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBOP) that ‘Limited Communication for Terrorist Inmates’. The changes were in response to criticism that the FBOP had not been adequately monitoring the communications of prisoners, permitting several terrorists convicted for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing to send letters to other terrorists overseas. ‘By concentrating resources in this fashion, it will greatly enhance the agency’s capabilities for language translation, content analysis and intelligence sharing’, according to a government statement released with the rules.”

The article continues, “The public was given until June 2, 2006, to comment, as required by law. Civil liberty and human rights groups immediately questioned the constitutionality and stated that the provisions were so broad that they could be applied to non-terrorists, witnesses and detainees. The bureau appeared to abandon the program, but on December 11, 2006, a Communication Management Unit (CMU) was quietly implemented at Indiana’s Federal Correctional Complex, Terre Haute. “From April to June 2010, the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) opened up a period for public comment around the establishment of two Communications Management Units” with several civil rights groups and advocates ‘coming together to urge the federal Bureau of Prisons to close the experimental prison units.’  It is unclear who authorized the program; it was either the Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel, FBOP Director Harley Lappin or United States Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.”

The Reasons for the BOP rejection of Rudy Davis’ letter

In the May 6, 2019, LoneStar1776 video around the 5 minute mark, Rudy Davis displays a letter he received from the Terre Haute prison explaining that the attached correspondence was rejected because “It has been determined the correspondence included unauthorized third party communications.” Rudy Davis mocks Warden J. R. Bell for “feeling so proud because he can quote prison policy”, and in response opens his Bible to quote some Scriptures.

The prison rules for correspondence vary between facilities, and it appears that Rudy Davis does not take the time to read these rules, so that his correspondence will be found acceptable.

Was Robert David Neal beheaded by Muslims?

Rudy Davis’ version of the murder of Robert David Neal, is that “…there is no way that Robert David Neal could have been beheaded and murdered, beheaded by Muslims, without the consent and the approval of the authorities of that prison.”

I could not find any public documentation online of the means by which Robert David Neal was murdered. As a 68 year old man, it would not be difficult for another prisoner to kill him with bare fists, before prison authorities could intervene.  Beheading is not something which is easily done unless a large sharp weapon is available, and the question is how such an instrument would be acquired in a CMU.

Rudy Davis does not provide any evidence to back up this possible scenario, but he does provide what he considers the motive for the BOP desiring the death of Robert David Neal. He suggests that the latest legal campaign of Neal against BOP director Charles E. Samuels, Jr. would cause a retaliatory response from prison authorities. However, prisoners regularly write pro se complaints against prison authorities, and there are means for prisoners to file complaints against prison practices.  I have read a number of such complaints, and often procedures are corrected by that means.

Rudy Davis considered Robert David Neal to be innocent of the charges which got him incarcerated, ignoring the established facts that Neal was an astute and learned con artist, whose resume included graduating from college, holding bank management positions, etc. And as shown in this excerpt of a letter from Neal, he could talk the Christian talk, while covering over the multitude of his sins with financial and legal buzz language.

But who did the courts say that Robert David Neal was, in reality?  When I checked PACER, Neal’s lawsuits both as a defendant and as a plaintiff was 2 pages long. The heart of Robert David Neal’s legal troubles is summarized in an October 1, 2007 U. S. Department of Justice, Northern District of Texas press release headlined, Local CPA Sentenced to More than 27 years in Federal Prison, Without Parole, on Fraud Conviction.

Interestingly, while Rudy Davis considered Neal to be innocent, in truth Robert David Neal aka Michael Skinner aka Albert David aka David Nelson had pleaded GUILTY in April 2007, “one day before his federal trial was to begin, to all six counts of an indictment charging him with wire fraud.  Neal, a former resident of Trophy Club, Texas, is currently in federal custody because of a supervised release violation stemming from a May 2002 federal felony conviction, also in the Northern District of Texas.”

The 2007 DOJ press release then describes the elaborate insurance fraud scheme, which Neal created, using the names of well known legitimate insurance companies such as Lloyd’s of London, to conduct his fraudulent scheme.  Using his aliases, he marketed fraudulent workers’ compensation insurance plans at below-market prices.

A 2002 DOJ press release stated that he had pled guilty in federal court for presenting a false claim to the United States Treasury Department, Internal Revenue Service.  It notes that Neal had also been indicted for health care fraud.

In a September 3, 2014 United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Opinion on Robert D. Neal, Petitioner-Appellant v. Leann LaRiva, Respondent-Appellee, Chief Justice Wood begins, “Robert Neal seems unable to resist dishonesty. After he was caught on the brink of establishing a fraudulent worker’s compensation insurance program, under which he hoped to bilk his clients out of more than $11 million, he was convicted on federal charges of wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and sentenced to 327 months’ imprisonment. See United States v. Neal, 294 F. App’x 96 (5th Cir.2008). He is currently serving that sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution in Terre Haute, Indiana.”

Continuing, the Opinion says, “Neal has not been a model prisoner. The case now before us arose after prison administrators discovered that he had signed a court document with the alias “David J. Nelson.” They disciplined him for violating a prison rule which forbids the “forging of any document, article of identification, money, security, or official paper” by revoking his commissary and telephone privileges for 180 days. Neal challenged this decision by seeking a writ of habeas corpus, see 28 U.S.C. § 2241, on the ground that he was sanctioned without due process.”

What?  Robert Neal was not a model prisoner?  He still used an alias while in prison to forge a court document?  The Opinion notes, “On the merits of the section 2241 petition, the district court noted that the only penalties Neal suffered from his violation of the rule concerning forgery were the loss of commissary and telephone privileges we mentioned earlier. Neither of those sanctions affected Neal’s custody, as the court correctly held, and so relief under section 2241 is unavailable. See, e.g., Maleng v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 490 (1989). Neal appeals, but he does not address the merits of the district court’s order denying his petition; instead, he reasserts his entitlement to arbitration.”

Additionally, the Judge says, “Ordinarily, that would be enough for us to resolve this appeal. But, as we point out in Rivera v. Drake, No. 14–1458 (7th Cir. Sept. 3, 2014), the judicial system cannot tolerate deception from litigants. Neal has persisted in his false assertion that an arbitration agreement exists between himself and the Bureau of Prisons throughout this case, up to and including a motion for judicial notice that he filed in this court on August 25, 2014, in which he re-submitted his phony arbitration agreement with the following statement:  [see 2013 Opinion on Robert David Neal vs. United States]

[He] brings forward an uncontested document which was identically filed in six (6) separate [sic ] but related proceedings before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (“USDC/SDIN”) as follows: (lists cases individually).

“To that list, we can add case numbers 2:12–cv–344–LJM–WGH and 2:13–cv–175–WTL–WGH, both of which also reflect Neal’s effort to rely on his “arbitration agreement.” In short, by his own admission, Neal has over and over again flouted his duty to be honest with the court.

“We note as well that Neal’s course of conduct before this court has earned him a sanction for his repeated filing of frivolous appeals and documents.”

We can go on, but it is clear that there would be no need for the BOP to murder Robert David Neal if his next legal missive had been filed against the BOP Director, as his history of filing frivolous appeals and documents suggests that his last effort would have been of the same low quality.

In a U. S. Court of Appeal 5th Circuit Opinion dated September 24, 2008, it was noted that Neal had forged the signature of U. S. District Judge Barbara Lynn.  Also, it was stated that following his October 26, 2006 indictment, Neal had sent numerous letters from prison attempting to coerce testimony from witnesses.

Further, the Opinion adds that “the court heard evidence not only regarding Neal’s pre-indictment conduct, but also his efforts to obstruct justice, coerce witnesses, and continue his scheme after he was indicted. While Neal might spend the rest of his life incarcerated, his flagrant disregard for the law suggests that a long sentence is the best way to incapacitate him. His sentence also makes clear that wire fraud is not a victimless crime, but here, had the potential to disrupt the lives of thousands of individuals. Neal’s lengthy sentence demonstrates that such behavior is intolerable.”

Let’s face it:  Rudy Davis loves the Criminal Mind and shows no mercy for the victims

None of the above statements from court documents involving Robert David Neal recommend that one should believe his pretensions of being a Christian.  Again Rudy Davis displays his self righteous indignation over the untimely death of a man who had no qualms in stealing insurance premiums from honest, hard working persons, who were unaware that they were being defrauded. So who is the Son of Belial here?  Rudy Davis’ prayer against Warden Bell is without merit. However, I would be interested to know the real reason why Neal was murdered in prison; we must remember that these incarcerated felons have preyed on others, without remorse, and can turn on each other in an instant.

Rudy Davis is himself a Shock Jock, an unmanageable shill, who disgraces the Christian faith.  He repeatedly turns justice and judgment upside down, without compassion for the victims of his favored criminals, which he terms American Political Prisoners.  Rudy Davis may find himself someday to be regarded as just another Cautionary Tale, spoken in hushed tones around a campfire, as sparks fly out, enumerating the endless supply of Alt media boogeyman who continually unsettle their listeners.

Rudy Davis of LoneStar1776 displaying his rifle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DECORUM & DIDACTICS: An Example of How A False Accuser Can Abuse the Civil Court Legal Process

“Plaintiff Steele and Intervenor Applicant Sweigert have been conspiring together and with intermediaries for more than one year and in an ongoing fashion to create and monetize a harassment campaign (The Campaign) intended to disrupt the Defendant’s business, personal life and world wide reputation, and chill Defendant’s journalistic endeavors which have revealed evidence of felony crimes by Plaintiff, Intervenor Applicant and third-party co-conspirators.” [Document 78 filed March 8, 2019 by Jason Goodman as “Defendant’s Opposition to the Motion to Intervene”.]

A little background history

As readers of Tracking the Leopard Meroz blog know, Jason Goodman  accused this author of being part of a co-conspiracy which had committed “felony crimes” in Document 78 in the Robert David Steele, et. al. vs. Jason Goodman, et. al. defamation lawsuit.

On March 15, 2019, in Document 79, I responded to those false allegations by submitting a Declaration, which included two exhibits to the Court.

In my Declaration to the Court, I described the content of this blog for the past four years, denied all of the allegations of Jason Goodman as being false and unsupported by ANY evidence, and noted that in the past 20 months of writing articles that involved Crowdsource the Truth, not once had Jason Goodman written this blog to challenge the numerous screenshots, transcriptions of videos, references to court documents or any other documentation I provide to support my commentary.  That is, not until Goodman commented on my blog on March 9, 2019; displayed as Exhibit B of Document 79, The Declaration of Jacquelyn Weaver.

That comment which was left by Jason Goodman on Tracking the Leopard Meroz, stated in part, ” If you believe the biased propaganda presented on this blog, you might ask yourself why Weaver has refrained from editorializing her latest post regarding the docket entry 78.  She has merely presented the court documents without her usual grossly slanted commentary, which is coincidentally continually lauding the very individuals behind the alleged conspiracy to create a harassment for pay operation, I would suggest, that may be due to the fact that any further comments she makes, may in fact, not be helpful to her in defending her actions should the court find my conclusions in this matter to be correct.

This blog is free and has never solicited donations. The conclusions which Jason Goodman wants the Court to endorse are his allegations that I, along with others, have committed felony crimes.

What are felony crimes?

Justice.gov states that “felonies are offenses that may result in prison sentences of more than one year…”, and they define such criminal acts as those that violate state or federal law.

As inferred in the comment left by Jason Goodman on this blog, he had inserted my name in a court document to which I am a non-party, as a warning  to intimidate this writer into silence.

Other False Allegations made anonymously

Around April 3, 2019, an internet handle Avi Avi posted insinuating questions  on the Kevin Alan Marsden YouTube channel comment section, saying,  “Did anyone notice that so called Jacqueline (sp) Weaver from Meroz doesn’t really live at her court filed address?  How come “Weaver” is trashing everyone that supported Dave Acton?  How come Dave Acton ‘hangs out’ anyone that helped him & has ‘Weaver’ do all his dirty work?  How is that CIA scumbag Robert David Steele, Dave Acton, NSA, Homeland Security & ‘Weaver’ are such good friends?  And u all think Goodman is the bad guy…funny.”

The first thing to notice in the above comment is that the anonymous liar implied that I had submitted a court affidavit using a false address of record, when a check of the Lamar County, Mississippi property records proves that I, along with my husband, am the owner of the house at that address.  There are 3 reasonable guesses as to who is behind the Avi Avi insinuations, and 2 of those possibilities are parties to the Robert David Steele defamation lawsuit.

Document 109:  Hidden Messages to subvert civil legal procedures?

In the most recent court document (109) submitted by Jason Goodman on May 7, 2019, he again declares, “Defendant has alleged a conspiracy between Plaintiff, Intervenor Applicant, co-Defendant Queen Tut aka Susan Lutzke aka Susan Holmes (herein after HOLMES) and non-party co-conspirators.”

On page 5 and 6 of Document 109, Jason Goodman declares, “Plaintiff and Intervenor Applicant, by their own admission, are both retired members of the military and clandestine services with specialties in deceptive psychological and information/disinformation operations.  Defendant has repeated the allegation that both parties are cooperating to use this instant legal action as a burdensome weapon of harassment against Defendant and to chill Defendant’s journalistic investigations into alleged criminal activity. Plaintiff has asserted that “no evidence” exists to support Defendant’s claim.”

Goodman continues, “It is Defendant’s belief that the coordinated effort between the Plaintiff, Intervenor Applicant, Holmes and third parties has been carefully crafted in a specific manner so as to  circumvent standard civil legal procedures and has been executed in absence of any overt, discoverable communications.  Coded messages sent in public via steganographic techniques, including YouTube videos and social media comments and the use of third-party intermediaries, deliberately avoid leaving a discoverable trail of evidence and sufficiently frustrate civil legal procedures.”

Jason Goodman provided no evidence to the Court to support this allegation.  What is more, Goodman had declared in Document 109 that “Defendant is entitled to an order protecting him from responding to Plaintiff’s discovery requests.”  With regard to his situation, his argument was that ample public information was available.  But when it comes to others, he accuses them of subverting the legal process by hiding secret messages in plain sight.

What are steganographic techniques, and how are they to be discovered?

Steganographic techniques involve hiding messages in plain sight, such as in digital images, or spam messages. If one is concerned about such matters, there exists software which can be purchased to analyze possible sources where steganographic techniques have been employed. In one advertisement,   McAfee.com asks, Are you protecting yourself from Stegware? And they offer a free “Try It Out” mechanism that allows for an image file to be dropped in their trial example, and analyzed for steganography.

If Jason Goodman wants to declare that steganographic techniques have been used as claimed in Document 109, certainly he could have also provided evidence of such, using a software program that detects stegwareHe provides no such software analysis as supporting evidence.

[There are numerous articles on the internet on steganography, if one is interested in this topic.  Semanticsscholar.org has published a 2013 thesis by Aimie Chee titled, Steganographic Techniques on Social Media:  Investigative Guidelines which provides sound research on this subject.]

Felony Crimes and Non-Parties of a Civil Lawsuit

In Document 78 which identifies by name, the accused participants in a co-conspiracy, all are NON PARTIES to the Robert David Steele lawsuit with the exception of Robert David Steele, the Plaintiff and Queen Tut, one of the Co-Defendants.  Jason Goodman asserted that he has “revealed evidence of felony crimes by Plaintiff, Intervenor Applicant and third-party co-conspirators.

Not only has Jason Goodman failed to provide evidence to support his allegations, he fails to document that he has provided this so-called proof of felony crimes to the state or federal law enforcement agencies responsible for investigating and for procuring  indictments for illegal conduct. Felony offenses are to be tried in a Criminal Court, not in a civil defamation case by a defendant who appears to regard himself as having the same standing as a state or federal law enforcement investigator.

Not only has Jason Goodman undertaken a role not belonging to him, but he disingenuously makes his false allegations in a Federal Civil Court proceeding where most of the accused do not have legal standing in which to exonerate their reputations.  Four of those accused by Goodman submitted Declarations to the Court as interested persons, NOT as parties in this defamation lawsuit.

I apologize for being redundant, but this nail needs to be driven in with several strikes of the hammer

Again, let me repeat:  The Robert David Steele, et. al. vs Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit is a defamation complaint filed in Federal Civil Court.  It is not a court which is a trier of felony criminal offenses.  Yet Jason Goodman, as a defendant in this case, has the temerity to cast felony criminal aspersions against several non-parties.  Is such a means of slander and libel to be tolerated in a civil court proceeding? 

Justice.gov in discussing the role of a grand jury, references Section 9.11.130 Limitation on Naming Persons as Unindicted Co-Conspirators.  The first paragraph reads, “In the absence of some significant justification, federal prosecutors generally should not identify co-conspirators in conspiracy indictments.  The practice of naming individuals as unindicted co-conspirators in an indictment charging a criminal conspiracy has been severely criticized in United States v. Briggs, 514 F. 2d 794 (5th Cir. 1975).

Thus we see that persons accused of being unindicted co-conspirators have been acknowledged as having certain rights in Criminal Court proceedings.  Do persons accused of being unindicted co-conspirators have any rights in Civil Court proceedings, where they lack legal standing as non-parties to defend themselves against false allegations from a Defendant in a defamation lawsuit?  Does a Defendant in a defamation case have the right to commit DEFAMATION in a civil court matter against non-parties?

United States vs. Briggs and the Rights of Unindicted co-conspirators

I am not an attorney, nor am I an expert in legal theory.  However, the Department of Justice has cited United States v. Briggs as an authority in governing how unindicted co-conspirators in criminal matters are to be addressed.  United States v. Briggs

For the sake of discussion, let’s see what points were presented in United States v. Briggs.  As background, this case was decided June 13, 1975, almost 44 years ago. The original case dealt with a five-count indictment by a federal Grand Jury in the Northern District of Florida against a number of persons involved in political demonstrations and disruptions at the Republican Party National Convention in 1972.

“The alleged conspirators included ten named persons plus others not named.  Of the ten named, seven were made defendants and three were not.  The latter three, although accused of participation in the criminal conspiracy, were determined in the indictment as ‘unindicted co-conspirators’.”

“Prior to the trial of the seven named defendants, two of the three named but unindicted persons…filed a petition in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, seeking entry of an order expunging the references to them in Count One of the indictment.  The United States Attorney appeared and contested the application.  The named defendants did not object to expunction of references to Beverly and Chambers.  The District Judge denied the petition without opinion or statement of reasons.  The petitioners appealed.  Pending appeal and following a month-long trial before a jury, the indicted conspirators were acquitted.”

The government had argued that “since the petitioners were not named as defendants they lacked standing to object to the contents of the indictment.”

On appeal, the Court stated, “We hold that there is a case or controversy, that the appellants have standing, and that the acquittal of the persons named as defendants does not moot the case.  The government’s position to the contrary on each of these points is founded upon its argument that since the appellants were not indicted, and particularly since those names as defendants were acquitted, the formal branding of appellants as alleged felons and as participants in a distasteful conspiracy is a mere chimera, neither substantial nor injurious.  This is at least disingenuous.”

“Beverly and Chambers complain of injury to their good names and reputations and impairment of their ability to obtain employment.  The courts have recognized in many contexts that these are substantial and legally cognizable interests entitled to constitutional protection against official action that debases them.”

Tort Law Quoted in United States v. Briggs

The United States v. Briggs opinion is extensive, but  an interesting reference cited which is appropriate to today’s post, says, “In tort law, slanderous publication imputing to another a criminal offense subjects the defamer to liability without proof of special harm.  Restatement (Second) of Torts, section 570 (Tent. Draft No. 20, 1974).”

Following this quote, the Court Opinion continued, “The government defies common sense with its theory that one’s interests are not adversely affected to any extent by being publicly branded as a felon so long as he is not named as a defendant for trial.  We reject as frivolous the contention that if appellants have suffered injury it is at the hand of only the news media to whom they should repair for relief…”.

Unindicted co-conspirators in criminal trials have rights…what about civil court proceedings?

The point I am addressing is that in a criminal case which is prosecuted by the government, the Court has ruled that those named as unindicted co-conspirators have rights which must be respected, in spite of the fact that these persons lack standing in a criminal proceeding.  Jason Goodman, one of three defendants in a federal civil defamation lawsuit, has cast aspersions on several non-parties whose only common bond is an interest in this case.

It is a danger to a civilized society, when slanderous publications impute to another a criminal offense, is committed by a defamer on social media.

How much more is that danger, when that same defamer can with apparent impunity in a civil proceeding, allege that non-parties to the lawsuit have committed unindicted felony crimes? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jason Goodman and Queen Tut: No Cloak for their Sin

Beginning in 2017, I had written several articles on Queen Tut aka Susan A. Lutzke aka Susan Holmes of Fort Collins, Colorado.

Today I am going to discuss Jason Goodman’s use of a recorded phone conversation he had with Queen Tut on April 3, 2019, which he uses as a witness statement in Document 106 Defendant’s Opposition to the Second Amended Motion to Intervene, filed May 1, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division in the Robert David Steele, et. al vs. Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit.

Queen Tut aka Susan Holmes getting contentious in a recent exchange at a Fort Collins council meeting

On page 7 of Document 106, Jason Goodman is discussing O. Marshall Richards aka Deep Uranium aka Mr. Hudson. It needs to be noted that the use of Richards as a hidden source on Crowdsource the Truth was sanctioned by Jason Goodman. And according to the testimony of Queen Tut in the Steve Outtrim’s CryptoBeast interview, she stated that Jason Goodman knew of Richards identity when he became a regular guest under the name Mr. Hudson.

Jason Goodman states, “Richards actual identity was not known to Goodman until it was revealed by Sweigert on Sweigert’s You Tube channel as he describes in his Amended Motion to Intervene.  Sweigert has publicly stated this information was provided to him by co-Defendant Lutzke and Lutzke confirmed in a phone call she placed to Defendant on April 3, 2019 that she has conspired with Sweigert conducting research and cooperating to defeat Defendant in this instant lawsuit.  Lutzke claimed Sweigert “was working with Robert David Steele” and Sweigert offered to help her “work this case out”.

How do Jason Goodman and Queen Tut explain Document 107 filed May 1, 2019 by Robert David Steele Opposing Dave Sweigert’s Intervenor Motion?

With regard to the alleged collusion between Robert David Steele and David Sweigert, this assertion is contradicted by the argumentation of Plaintiffs  Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network, who are OPPOSING Dave Sweigert’s Intervenor Motion.  See rds doc 107

Curiously, Susan A. Lutzke and Susan Holmes share the same address in Fort Collins, Colorado

Back in 2018, Susan A. Lutzke aka Queen Tut was served with a process summons in the Robert David Steele lawsuit.  As seen in a screen shot of the first page of a letter from Steven A. Biss, attorney to Susan A. Lutzke her address was 2608 Leisure Drive, Apt. B, Fort Collins, CO 80525.Compare the address on that document with the address sworn to on a Candidate Affidavit filed by Susan Homes when she decided to run for the April 2, 2019 election in Fort Collins, Colorado.

The probable origin of Queen Tut’s use of two last names; and why she is calling herself Susan Holmes to represent her deceased son’s memory

Susan A. Lutzke aka Susan Holmes has two sons; Alec Chang Lutzke and the late Jeremy Holmes. According to the Collegian March 27, 2019 article 4 Candidates campaign for District 2 Councilmember Position Up For Election by Julia Trowbridge, “Holmes is running because her son was shot by a Colorado State University police officer July 2017 and aims to end police violence and corruption in Fort Collins…In her effort, Holmes has drafted legislation, called the “Jeremy Holmes Act,” to mandate that unredacted body camera footage from an officer-involved homicide should be released within five days of an incident.”

Susan Holmes also had shared the following information on herself.

The day after Susan Holmes lost her election, she calls Jason Goodman

One day after the election, where Susan Holmes got 8% of the vote, she placed a phone call with Jason Goodman, which he recorded, published on his You Tube channel Crowdsource the Truth, and also provided a transcript displayed as Document 106-3 exhibit C supporting his opposition to the Second Amended Motion to Intervene in the Robert David Steele defamation lawsuit. rds doc 106 3 exhibit C 5 1 2019

April 30, 2019 Jason Goodman published this video; the same day he sent his Opposition document to the Court

The description of this video states, “Susan Lutzke aka Queen Tut is a horrible but frequent liar.  She recently called me, revealing a long suspected conspiracy between her, D. George “Acton” Sweigert and Robert David Steele.  While nothing she says can be believed at this point, how else would David Sweigert know the true identity of Oakey Marshall Richards were this particular admission not true?”

Some of the interesting portions of this recording are as follows:

Jason Goodman:  What do you mean you dumped Dave Acton?  What were you doing with Dave Acton?

Queen Tut: Well, I was just doing research with him.

Jason Goodman:  What kind of research?

Queen Tut:  I was just providing him with research that I, I had information on, that I had information on.

Jason Goodman:  Alright.

Queen Tut:  That was a while ago, OK?  So um anyway, uhh, the RDS lawsuit is garbage.  Um, I never supported it.  I knew Dave, along with a number of other people.  We were D M-ing.  We had connections with D M-ing together.  Right, a bunch of us um and uhh all I can say is that in my time of dealing with him I discovered that he was working with Robert David Steele.  [D M-ing means Direct Messaging via Twitter]

Jason Goodman:  How did you discover that?

Queen Tut:  Because he kept trying to get me involved in the case.  Then I confronted him.

Jason Goodman:  Yeah.

Queen Tut:  See he kept trying to get me involved in the case.  He would keep saying, you know I can help you work this case out and I would say no, I haven’t been served.  I haven’t been served.

Jason Goodman:  I saw a picture on your house from Biss and something he had submitted to the court in a PDF, they had a photo with your address and everything.

Queen Tut:  Right. But I don’t live there.

Jason Goodman:  I mean it seemed like the address you were talking about in the 911 call that he references in that document.

Queen Tut:  I am NOT Susan Lutzke.  I’m Suzanne Ingraham.

Jason Goodman:  Ingraham?  How come you appeared in that video in front of town hall whatever Colorado saying you were Susan Holmes?  And why is Jeremy’s last name Holmes?

Queen Tut:  That isn’t me.

Jason Goodman: What do you mean that isn’t you?  It sounds exactly like you.

Queen Tut:  It’s not me.  I’m Suzanne Ingraham, but I’ve always gone by Suzanne or Susan.  [ see document which was submitted to the Robert David Steele lawsuit which purported that Queen Tut is an elderly woman with dementia] queen tut 2 22 2018

Also see Plaintiffs’ Response to letter from “Mercia Francis”  Documents 31 & 33

Jason Goodman:  Now wait a minute, there’s an article in a newspaper called like the Coloradan or whatever-I’d have to look it up.  But I remember you called me.  I was driving in a rental car in Las Vegas after you had made a big deal about that video that you wanted to delete with Hudson and you told me you had just come back from the campus where you had the sign that said, Kill All the Police.  Then I see in the newspaper someone who looks exactly like the woman who sounds exactly like you in the video holding a sign that sounds exactly like you in the video holding a sign that says Kill All Police. 

[see collegian.com article Hodges:  Protests are meant to start conversation, no matter what]

collegian .com photo

Queen Tut:  That wasn’t me. (Later on in this phone conversation, she states, “No! Nope, that’s not me.  I don’t even live in Colorado.”)

 

 

 

 

A Review of Jason Goodman’s use of a blatantly unreliable witness in a court proceeding

So, let’s review:  Jason Goodman receives a phone call from Queen Tut aka Susan Lutzke aka Susan Holmes on April 3, 2019, wherein she denies that she has been served in the Robert David Steele lawsuit because she is neither of those persons and does not live in Colorado.  However, when she was a frequent guest on Jason Goodman’s Crowdsource the Truth show, there was at least one show where the unfortunate death of her son in a confrontation with police officers, was discussed. And there is other evidence brought forth that argues strongly as to her true identity.

Queen Tut claims she is Suzanne Ingraham, which was identified in Documents 31 & 33 in the Robert David Steele lawsuit.  These documents are not public on the docket, as they were sent without a return address, in a letter from a Mercia Francis who says her mother, Helen Suzanne Ingraham, is elderly and has dementia.

Jason Goodman is the person who promoted Queen Tut to prominence, displaying her “research” which promoted Robert David Steele to be a fraud, among other unfounded allegations.  Because of their combined efforts in 2017 to defame Steele,  a defamation lawsuit was filed in Federal Court September 1, 2017 against Goodman, Negron and Queen Tut.

As of April 30, 2019, Jason Goodman described the April 3, 2019 phone call from  Susan Lutzke aka Susan Holmes aka Queen Tut as evidence that Susan Lutze is a horrible and frequent liar.  Yet, contradicting this conclusion, he uses this same phone call as evidence to support his argumentation that D. George Sweigert is working with Robert David Steele.  The transcript provided to the court of the phone call does not identify who is stating what; it reflects a continual word stream that apparently has not been proofed against the actual phone call to identify who said what.

Tracking the Leopard Meroz has never supported the false allegations of Queen Tut

As has been documented in several articles, including comments, posted on the Tracking the Leopard Meroz blog, Queen Tut is unreliable as a witness, and she enjoys commenting under various anonymous handles which emanate from two IP addresses. She refused to come forward in a proper manner and address the allegations in the Robert David Steele lawsuit.  The fact that Queen Tut now says that she is neither Lutzke or Holmes, yet no one under those names has come forth in the lawsuit to declare that they were wrongly identified as a Defendant, is something she does not explain.

When she did not like what I had written about her on this blog, she had the temerity to impersonate Robert David Steele in a comment. In addition, under her false Twitter account, she stated this:

Also she stated this, using one of her anonymous handles which is linked to her other anonymous comments via the same IP address:After I submitted a Declaration in the Robert David Steele lawsuit in March of 2019, to refute the unfounded allegations which Jason Goodman made against my name in Court Document 78, Jason Goodman has AGAIN named me in his most recent Document 106, as a co-conspirator with various persons I have no relationship with, including Queen Tut

Jason Goodman promoted Queen Tut on his program, and they are co-defendants in a defamation lawsuit.  Her lying is his responsibility because he gave her the platform on which to defame Robert David Steele.

When I kicked her off of this blog, she went over to Steve Outtrim to plead her cause, and he granted her an interview on his CryptoBeast YouTube channel.

Since 2017, I have written articles against Queen Tut, although at least twice, I have excused some of her behavior as perhaps being the result of deep grief over her son’s death. But even that period of grace must give way to the truth of what really is.  And as both Jason Goodman and Queen Tut continue to lie and defame others, without supporting evidence, I must continue to oppose their actions and words. 

 

D. George Sweigert, Intervenor-Applicant, Files Documents 101-103 in the Robert David Steele lawsuit, Requesting Injunctive Relief

On April 29, 2019, Documents 101, 102, 102-2, and 103 were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond, in the Robert David Steele et. al. vs. Jason Goodman, et. al. lawsuit.

Document 101 (2 pages)  Notice of Motion Requesting Leave of Court to File Motion for Injunctive Relief by Intervenor-Applicant  rds doc 101 429 2019

Document 102 (19 pages) Motion Requesting Leave of Court to File Motion for Injunctive Relief by Intervenor-Applicant  rds doc 102 429 2019

Document 102-2 (2 pages)  Proposed Order  rds doc 102 2 429 2019

Document 103 (48 pages + 29 pages exhibits Doc 103-1)  Memorandum of Law to Support Intervenor-Applicant’s Motion for Injunctive Relief  rds doc 103 429 2019