D. George Sweigert vs. Jason Goodman Amended RICO Complaint

On June 14, 2018, which was the one year anniversary of the Port of Charleston dirty bomb incident, D. George Sweigert filed a 24 page RICO lawsuit against Jason Goodman, as Defendant.

On June 29, 2018, the original complaint was amended, increasing it to 44 pages.  The Amended Complaint can be seen at this link:   sweigert amended rico 1

The following notes are suggested areas of interest to the reader.

The primary reasons why we should be interested in this RICO case are stated in the Introduction-Summary.

Under “Introduction”, a Summary has been added in this amended complaint, which  focuses on the actions of the U. S. Coast Guard’s  washing of “its hands of any meaningful investigation of a radiological bomb threat delivered to the Charleston Sector duty officer.” Consequently, the FBI was relied upon to investigate the source of the bomb threat, yet we find that this entire matter was “resolved” within 24 hours. One contributing factor noted was that the Midwestern conspiracy theorist allegedly hid behind his journalist privilege of not disclosing his source.

Dave Sweigert observes that one F.B.I. agent investigating this event was apparently from the West Virginia area of operations–exactly the location of the contract F.B.I. informant which had been the hidden source of George Webb Sweigert. He notes, “An overwhelming preponderance of evidence indicates that the F. B. I. took no action to mitigate the phenomenal conflict of interest in investigating this matter–as it involved one of their contract informants.  The practical effects of the F. B. I.’s apparent white-wash has been to allow the wrong-doers to continue their operations with a bold sense of immunity from government prosecution; engaging in a series of illegal racketeering activities.”

In the Background section of the Introduction, more than 4 pages are devoted to laying out the racketeering pattern, the Port of Charleston incident, and the U. S. C G. authority for investigating the events which transpired on June 14, 2018.

Jurisdiction

This RICO lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, thus nine reasons are stated to establish both who was impacted by the Port of Charleston dirty bomb threat hoax as well as what laws and regulations apply as a measuring stick of the actions of that eventful day. The plaintiff invokes the Private Attorney General (PAG) doctrine which allows him to “augment limited resources of the U. S. C. G.” and their “prosecutorial gaps”. This allows “a private citizen’s standing to sue for vindication of a public objective”.

Parties

The general description states, “This complaint alleges that the defendant, and his cooperative of wrongdoers, operate in alignment on social media for a common purpose.  By staging fake news, raising public alarm, spreading junk science, using deception to implement the Port hoax, etc. are rewarded with the expectation of remuneration, increases in their financial status and receipt of other such pecuniary advantages and benefits”.

There are 7 Parties described in detail:

The Plaintiff-Certified in Critical Infrastructure Protection

Wrong-doer Multimedia System Design, Inc.

Crowdsource the Truth- Racketeering Enterprise

Defendant Jason Goodman – Coordinator of CSTT RICO Cartel

Wrong-doer George Webb Sweigert – “Investigative Journalist”

Wrong-doer Deep Uranium – “Confidential Source” of Hoax

Wrong-Doer Quinn Michaels -Team Tyler Hacker Network

General Allegations:

The last sentences conclude, “Unfortunately for law enforcement (and for the public), the complex maze of wrong-doers involved would have been perplexing to unravel.  It is highly unlikely that any significant legal consequences would have been visited upon the defendants and wrong-doers without this present lawsuit.”  Also, the plaintiff Sweigert emphasizes that “this is not a private dispute and there are no other equitable remedies available under law, except those remedies articulated herein.”

Specific Allegations:  Ten Counts (in the original complaint 5 were listed)

Count One:  MDSI Operates as a Racketeering Enterprise

Count Two: MDSI/CSTT Closure of the Wando Welch Terminal at the Port of Charleston

Count Three: Fraudulent “Hudson Intelligence Group”

Count Four:  Conspiracy to Defraud The United States

Count Five:  Murder For Hire Activities on the Darknet

Count Six:  Hoax Assassination Plots

Count Seven:  Malicious State Actors Deny Civil Rights

Count Eight:  Trafficking in Personally Identifiable Information

Count Nine:  Tampering With A Witness

Count Ten:  Abuse of Court Processes by a Federally Protected Witness

Tracking the Leopard Meroz hopes that this amended complaint will be read with interest and with care.  The overall importance of the issues addressed by this lawsuit, as well as the finer details, are highly interesting and of great import in connection to our contemporary Alternative News Media style of journalism.

 

 

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “D. George Sweigert vs. Jason Goodman Amended RICO Complaint

  1. Pingback: Acton v Goodman – Was Charleston Dirty Bomb Hoax an FBI Operation? [Update] | Burners.Me: Me, Burners and The Man

  2. I’d be careful with this one. The suit is false. Just because a federal CIVIL suit is filed does not make the information real. It is a common tactic to make accusations appear authentic. This could be a case of legal defamation against the defendant. I have read the suit, and it appears just to be an attempt to silence Jason Goodman. I am a Christian. Not only is there a media assault on Christianity, but there is a direct assault to try to silence Internet investigative journalists.

    • I agree with you that there are federal civil lawsuits that do not represent a legitimate complaint. I am following this lawsuit, as I also have been following the Robert David Steele defamation case as well, because it involves the Port of Charleston incident which had caught my attention a year ago.

      There IS an assault on the internet to silence genuine investigative journalists. However, when one decides to follow this suspicion, and observe what the public domain evidence is, some of those who cry the loudest about censorship have exhibited behavior that has lowered the standards of reporting to a very low level. It is clear that such persons may be nothing but agent provocateurs in our midst.

      One thing which I do like about the federal civil procedures is that they are orderly, and allow for both sides to present facts and arguments which must meet a higher standard than public opinion allows. Jason Goodman is a middle aged, college educated man of the world and I am disappointed that he has contributed to lowering the standards of investigative reporting to juvenile mudslinging.

      Lawsuits take time, and most persons soon lose interest in them. However, at this blog I live in a slower paced world than Twitter, Facebook, YouTube videos…and so I am willing to plod along posting my PACER documents, so that others can view them for free. Time will reveal whether these lawsuits serve to enforce existing laws which are meant to protect public and private interests. By the way, my family had a weekly newspaper which lasted more than 50 years, and I am intimately acquainted with the issues of free press, free speech, and journalistic integrity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.