For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Matthew 7:2
On September 1, 2017 a $15,500,000 lawsuit for defamation was filed in the U. S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia-(Richmond), by attorney Steven Scott Biss, on behalf of plaintiffs Robert David Steele and Earth Intelligence Network against three defendants, Jason Goodman, Patricia A. Negron and Queen Tut a woman believed to be known as Carla A. Howell.
Yesterday I used my PACER account to look at the court docket of this lawsuit and noticed that a summons had been served on Susan A. Lutzke of Fort Collins, Colorado, who is now known to Crowdsource The Truth viewers as Jason Goodman’s repeat guest, Queen Tut. Because of this identity change of one of the defendants, I then wanted to know if Robert David Steele had effectively cleared the public record of his false accusations that Carla A. Howell, who is connected to the Libertarian Party, had defamed and injured his reputation under the internet handle, Queen Tut. I see that Howell’s name still appears on the lawsuit. Will Ms. Howell now sue Mr. Steele using the exact charges that he accused her with?
One has to wonder if Steele had long considered Carla A. Howell to be his personal adversary since he had been so hasty to accuse her of slandering him under a pseudonym. This is a reasonable question given that he has stated that he is composing an enemies list of those who disagree with him, which he desires to add to his lawsuit.
When I entered Susan A. Lutzke’s name into a search engine, not much came up, except two internet posts of note. The first is a screenshot of a Twitter message which declares that Queen Tut is Susan A. Lutzke, and gives one of her addresses of record.
The second reference to her name is found in this article written by Robert David Steele on November 8, 2017 called #GoogleGestapo -Censorship and Crowdstalking Made Easy: How The Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates Critics. This article only states, “…and ‘Queen Tut’ now known to be Susan Lutzky(sp).” I reviewed this lengthy article which Medium.com says takes 37 minutes to read, and have a few comments to make on the content. I have put Robert David Steele’s words in black and my comments in maroon.
“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” (John 8:32)
It is a common writer’s device to showcase a quotation at the beginning of an article which embodies an underlying principle of the topic. In today’s post I have begun with a quote from Matthew 7:2, For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
Robert David Steele begins his article with a quote from the Bible also; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. This is a quote used by many persons, even atheists. But this is but the second half of a sentence spoken, and when you quote the entire words, the meaning is altered from a general “truth” to God’s truth as spoken. The entire sentence should read (John 8:31-32) Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then ye be disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
You see, by only quoting half a sentence, Steele has altered the meaning of the word truth, as it is defined by the actual speaker of that sentence. Now why would he do that? I suppose that he wants you to think that he is interested in truth, even while he is in the act of lying about how the word truth is used in its actual context.
Steele likes to complain that he is misunderstood because his critics have not read his Amazon.com book reviews which he claims contains great knowledge. Recently, I had spent several days reading a broad sample of his book reviews, as my intent is to be as impartial as possible. One of those book reviews I read by Steele was on Christ’s Ventriloquists: The Event that Created Christianity by Eric Zuesse. Steele titles his review, Christianity is Fraud Subordinated to Empire, New Testament Written By Enemies of Jesus & Judaism. He walks in agreement with the unbelieving Jewish author, Zuesse, that throughout history, God was powerless to preserve his own words in writing.
This is a speculative account based on personal experience and broad reading. In no way is it a substitute for a proper legal discovery process-but it could be useful in guiding such a process.
This is the first sentence of the actual essay, after the lead quotation from the Bible on Truth. Steele hedges his words by saying his thoughts are opinion, i.e. speculative, and we see that he has a goal in mind in revealing his words. That goal has to do with a lawsuit where he is Plaintiff extraordinaire. He thinks it would be a good thing if Roger Stone, representing an Alt-Right white male would team up with an Alt-Left black female who goes by the handle Charlie Peach, and which he implies, by innuendo, might be Cynthia McKinney…to do what? He wants them to jointly sue Twitter.
If Roger Stone and “Charlie Peach” were to sue Twitter together, in combination with my own lawsuit against three apparatchiks and their many co-conspirators, and the new potentially formidable case by Prager University against Google, You Tube, and DOES 1-25, I believe these three cases and perhaps others might converge in a most constructive manner assuredly in the public interest. The above juxtaposition is important-the Deep State is seeking to censor and in some cases digitally assassinate both those on the right and those on the left who challenge official narratives. This is discrimination based on political affiliation or belief.
In previous articles I have noted his lust to sue just about anyone who does not properly admire his achievements. One of those high points of his life is his claim to having once headed up a CIA false flag operation in South America. By boasting of this, Robert David Steele is saying in essence that he is without a conscious whatsoever about committing criminals acts in which someone else is framed. Right now, he has retired from his CIA and government military contractor hey-days, and he wants to be a tax exempt change agent for the Presidential election process. It appears his favorite method of change is the Federal Civil Lawsuit so that he can FORCE the legal discovery process to reveal hidden facts which he can use for his preplanned purposes.
Below is a partial listing of specific trolls for whom I have in hand copies of defamatory statements suitable for submission to a Court, for YouTube only. I have another list and copies of defamatory statements for Facebook. Every single one of these individuals is discoverable in true name via legal discovery, and can be held to account as a crowdstalker and co-conspirator.(I have made 2 screenshots representing the You Tubers, below):
Is your name or internet handle on this list of 247 persons which Robert David Steele is accusing of being a crowdstalker and co-conspirator? If so, he wants to add you to his list of defendants who he is accusing of defamation in a Federal lawsuit. I will only note one name as it is well known…that of Omegashock, #161 on the list. John Little has a blog named Omegashock and he is pro-Israel, so I assume that is his “crime”. However, whenever I have read his blog and how he discusses the issues with his readers, he is always a gentleman.
I recognize a few other handles by virtue of having read their comments on some videos which I have viewed. Once I observed, Robert David Steal, #183 commenting on Crowdsource The Truth, during live streaming. Robert David Steal is hilarious, but one time when I was laughing at his comments, he went over the line, and Jason Goodman, #91 on the above list and one of the defendants in Steele’s lawsuit, shut him down. So how could anyone accuse those two of being co-conspirators?
In my direct personal experience, these troll armies are very capable at persistent pervasive crowd-stalking. Every YouTube channel I have appeared on has been attacked (not just current, but past), to the point that most of my hosts have been forced to disable all comments, depriving the honest viewers of the interaction that I take pains to provide when not being crowd-stalked.. Many hosts have not invited me to return, perhaps influenced by the demonetization (“shadow banning”) of any interview with me rather than the substance of my work that led to my being recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize in January 2017….[Under the subtitle, Media “Hit Jobs” On Demand]…During a two-hour interview with Alex Jones…in answer to a caller who in retrospect may have been setting me up, did I address children sent into space on “20 year and out missions” to leverage growth while in transit; and an existing colony on Mars, established fifteen years ago, with 10,000 people there now. The Daily Beast conflated these three completely separate factual concepts to discredit me.
The troll army accusation follows the list of persons which Steele wants to bring into his lawsuit as co-conspirators with the defendants Goodman, Negron and Queen Tut. Then he launches into other problems he has had with his reputation, including his belief that there is a colony of persons on Mars which have been living there for the past fifteen years. Robert David Steele thinks that his nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize should override any other perceptions that the public may have that he is a kook, one whose credibility hinges on his strange Hall Of Fame status on Amazon.com as a book reviewer.
As someone who has managed a false flag operation for the CIA, and who is a top published author on the topics of deep state, false flag operations, pedophilia, and fake news (and rarely but sometimes about the holocaust and Zionist subversion), I speculate that my non-profit educational website is triggering just about every flagword on the Deep State/Zionist watchlist–a watchlist that is “Top Secret” and not subject to any form of Congressional or judicial oversight….All Paths Lead to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)…
Robert David Steele never takes personal responsibility for his own reckless words and actions, or how they are seldom backed up by facts and evidence which are relevant to the assertions he publishes.
Now in this article Robert David Steele says that his opinions are speculative. I find it interesting that the document recently filed in his lawsuit, entitled, Defendant Patricia A. Negron’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion To Dismiss the Complaint, has this statement, “A complaint must be dismissed if it does not allege “enough facts to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.” Bell Atl. v. Twombly, 550 U. S. 544,570 (2007). The plaintiff’s “[f]actual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.”
Under Argument, we find this, “To state a claim for defamation, the Plaintiffs must show (1) publication, (2) an actionable statement, and (3) the requisite intent…Words that are “merely offensive or unpleasant statement” are not defamatory. Id. To be defamatory, the words must make the plaintiff appear “odious, infamous, or ridiculous.”
And therein lies the problem: it is Robert David Steele’s own words that make him appear odious, infamous, and ridiculous. Robert David Steele ought to be suing himself.
John Little of Omegashock has answered RDS in his November 17, 2017 post. To read it scroll past his main article until you reach the link to the Meroz article.