On a dark and stormy night in MOOtana, two men huddle around a bonfire at Camp Cryptologic, staring at each other in despair. A Third Man stands with outstretched arms holding up a lightning rod, praying for illumination. Finally the Second Man breaks the eerie silence to launch into a rant against &*%*^, the author of Tracking the Leopard Meroz, who he considered was beneath his intellect when she thought that his recent video The Tactic of Lawfare to Silence Truth Seekers… should have been titled The Tactic of Law-ghter to Silence Truth Tellers.
The First Man assured everyone that he was getting ready to SLAPP her. “We are proceeding with a lawsuit against all the named protagonists” he said. “No one can touch the anointed Watchmen; after all, I have lead 10’s of thousands of people to the Lord on talk radio”.
Suddenly a SONIC BOOM sounded from the throne of God, and the Third Man’s face lit up as he brightly proclaimed, “I beheld Satan falling from heaven as lightning, proof that our prayers are answered! The Protagonists will become proto-agonistes!!!!!!!”
Here at Starlit Gardens (which recently received a dishonorable mention in an on-air rant of the Second Man), recent events have gotten even more surreal than I ever imagined they could be. If you have read the QAlert of Steve Quayle and the two emails written by Pastor David Lankford referring to someone they term An Unreasonable Man, you may get the impression that this title/description has some cryptological depths to it.
Now Steve Quayle used the word protagonists to describe his adversaries, which he secretly would like to SLAPP around. The word protagonist refers to the chief actor in a play, as for example that great drama which is conducted at that infamous camp for Bohemians in California, featuring a Great Owl. This owl is likened to Molech, the god of fire sacrifice, in a drama called The Cremation of Care. Alex Jones once walked unhindered into that camp, and with a hidden camera, not surprisingly recorded the goings-on of the princes of this world.
Now believe it or not, there is a movie called An Unreasonable Man. It is a documentary on Ralph Nader, that father of consumer protection. Steve Quayle and Pastor David Lankford have taken the phrase an unreasonable man, once said by John Little, and jumped on it as proof of his condemnation in the sight of God. Now recently, John Little has been an advocate for consumer protection, and is becoming a hero in the sight of many as he exposed the true identity of Mike Whitestone and now that of the promoters of V-the Guerrilla Economist.
Let us examine the curse, and yes it is a Whip of Fire CURSE, spoken by Pastor David Lankford against An Unreasonable Man. Now I do not know John Little, except in the context of the candid honesty with which he discussed the Nathan Leal controversy, and now the recent revelations made on V-the Guerrilla Economist. I am not familiar with his theology, I have no idea how he makes a living, or other personal details other than that he seems to be married to a very sweet woman, and lives in Taiwan.
When Pastor David Lankford addressed an email to John Little as dear John chicken Little, I was fascinated. Now I am known for mocking Mockers, and to find that an anointed member of the Holy Trinity of the Inner Circle of The Sky is Falling Radio Broadcasters is using mocking language, is well, a bolt of lightning, a purely illuminating thought.
Now we must understand that Pastor Lankford sent an email to John Little in which he signed it Sent from my IPhone. This is a key piece of information! We now know that Pastor David Lankford is AKA Sent from my IPhone. He accused John Little of this: “You hid behind a key board for you are cowardice…The Bible is clear if you have ought with your brother you will go to them you don’t text them nor email them but again you hide behind a keyboard.” In the email where he did sign it Pastor Lankford Sent from my IPhone, he reproves John chicken Little saying, “By the way Jesus did not send a text or an email people. Christ engaged them personally which you never do because you are an apostate and hypocrite.”
Does anyone detect the hypocrisy of the protagonist Pastor David Lankford when he messaged words of reproof using the tiny little keyboard on his IPhone?
Now really, Sent from my IPhone, did Jesus require John Little to pay for plane tickets from Taiwan to your little Koo-koo nest in America or to that Quayle nest in Montana in order to speak face to face? Did Pastor David Lankford fly from the heights of his nest to Taiwan? Biblical history would seem to reveal that there were no IPhones and computer keyboards 2000 years ago. Jesus could walk around Israel and talk face to face with various persons because the distances were not extensive. Unless of course he preferred Skype over texting….we could go on and on with this discussion… this strange divider of the words of God, a Scriptorian, no less, prefers texting sent from his IPhone to actual face to face contact. Hypocrite! You are a protagonist in the theater of the absurd.
Words used to describe the Unreasonable Man include apostate, reprobate, vile, castaway, hypocrite, viper, the judge, jury and executioner, an (attacker) for no reason whatsoever, cowardice (personified), like Alexander the Coppersmith, not one in his marriage, arrogant, bigoted, self-righteous, stinking to high heaven, writing “sewage”, a deceiver, a disgrace, shipwrecked in faith, a buffoon…
What did John Little do to be so highly complimented by a Man Without Sin? Well for one, this Man With Clean Hands thinks he is exempt from sins of Omission. He does not like it implied that he is in anyway associated with “that vile person” V-the Guerrilla Economist. As I see it, another rat is trying to jump ship whenever the flag of The U. S. Code on Wire Fraud is raised on the mast. According to the Scriptorian Lankford, John Little fulfills 2 Thessalonians 3:2 in its totality. Why is this scripture being used to bludgeon the supposed Unreasonable Man, the hero of consumer protection? It represents the return blow of vengeance of the Commander of Camp Cryptologic, for one reason. Do I need to say anything further? Just who is the disgrace here? Even if John Little is wrong in his theology, I believe that the Lord would find his advocacy on behalf of those who have been abused by the Quayle/Lankford/ Hagmann camp to be highly commendable.
Here are 3 screenshots of the emails referenced above from this article by John Little of OmegaShock: